Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-07 Thread .:XvG:. DeeVee
VANILLA PIE! BWAHAAHAAA!!! On Jun 7, 2013 1:21 PM, "ronon chowdhury" wrote: > I like pie! > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:18 PM, John wrote: > >> On 6/7/2013 6:50 AM, Cody Woodson wrote: >> >> I can confirm that switching to MM 1.9.2 and validating worked. >> >> >> For anyone else still having t

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-07 Thread ronon chowdhury
I like pie! On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:18 PM, John wrote: > On 6/7/2013 6:50 AM, Cody Woodson wrote: > > I can confirm that switching to MM 1.9.2 and validating worked. > > > For anyone else still having this problem, just updating the server again > should be enough. MM 1.10 also works afterwar

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-07 Thread John
On 6/7/2013 6:50 AM, Cody Woodson wrote: I can confirm that switching to MM 1.9.2 and validating worked. For anyone else still having this problem, just updating the server again should be enough. MM 1.10 also works afterward. It turns out that Valve silently released a second optional updat

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-07 Thread Cody Woodson
i-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers >>>> Andrew Irvine Thursday, June 06, 2013 >>>> 2:16 PM >>>> That’s development branch software for anyone else wondering. >>>> >>>> Marcin, can

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-07 Thread Marcin Paterek
_ >>>> Csgo_servers mailing list >>>> Csgo_servers@list.valvesoftware.com >>>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers >>>> Andrew Irvine >>>> Thursday, June 06, 2013 2:16 PM >>

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-07 Thread Michael Loveless
list >>> Csgo_servers@list.valvesoftware.com >>> https://list.valvesoftware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers >>> Andrew Irvine >>> Thursday, June 06, 2013 2:16 PM >>> >>> That’s development branch software for anyone else wondering. >>&g

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-07 Thread Michael Loveless
i-bin/mailman/listinfo/csgo_servers >> Andrew Irvine >> Thursday, June 06, 2013 2:16 PM >> >> That’s development branch software for anyone else wondering. >> >> ** ** >> >> Marcin, can you also try to start the server with a stable release of >

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-06 Thread Saul Rennison
re.com [ > mailto:csgo_servers-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] > *On Behalf Of *Marcin Paterek > *Sent:* Thursday, June 6, 2013 2:11 PM > *To:* csgo_servers@list.valvesoftware.com > *Subject:* Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod > > ** ** > > Vitalyi, I always

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-06 Thread {{A-BS}} Techgunner
To: csgo_servers@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod   Vitalyi, I always force validation with app_update 740 validate. But can you run Metamod

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-06 Thread {{A-BS}} Techgunner
To: csgo_servers@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod   Vitalyi, I always force validation with app_update 740 validate. But can you run Metamod

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-06 Thread Nicholas Hastings
ubject: Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod   Vitalyi, I always force validation with app_update 740 validate. But can you run Metamod 1.10.0-hg841?   2013/6/6 Vitaliy Genkin <vita...@valvesoftware.com>   ___Csgo_se

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-06 Thread Marcin Paterek
; *From:* csgo_servers-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto: >> csgo_servers-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcin >> Paterek >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 6, 2013 2:11 PM >> >> *To:* csgo_servers@list.valvesoftware.com >> *Subject:* Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-06 Thread Marcin Paterek
ne 6, 2013 2:11 PM > > *To:* csgo_servers@list.valvesoftware.com > *Subject:* Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod > > ** ** > > Vitalyi, I always force validation with app_update 740 validate. But can > you run Metamod 1.10.0-hg841? > > ** ** > > 2013/6/6 Vitaliy Genkin

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-06 Thread Andrew Irvine
rvers-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Marcin Paterek Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2013 2:11 PM To: csgo_servers@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod Vitalyi, I always force validation with app_update 740 validate. But can you run Metamod 1.10.0-hg841? 2013/6/6 Vitaliy Genkin m

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-06 Thread Marcin Paterek
Vitalyi, I always force validation with app_update 740 validate. But can you run Metamod 1.10.0-hg841? 2013/6/6 Vitaliy Genkin > Would you be able to force a validation of your Windows dedicated server > install directory and ensure that your installation of mod dlls doesn’t > tamper with the

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-06 Thread Vitaliy Genkin
Would you be able to force a validation of your Windows dedicated server install directory and ensure that your installation of mod dlls doesn't tamper with the game binaries that are shipped in Steam depot? I am able to successfully install latest versions of meta mod plugin as "addons" and my

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod ... Day 7

2013-06-06 Thread Erik-jan Riemers
ist.valvesoftware.com] u ime korisnika violet [ > avio...@gmail.com] > *Poslato:* 6. jun 2013 11:38 > *Za:* csgo_servers@list.valvesoftware.com > *Tema:* [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod ... Day 7 > > Thank you for the completely useless answers in the past 24 hours.. I > wi

[Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod ... Day 7

2013-06-06 Thread Dusan Tomic
TLDR; Marry me? xD Od: csgo_servers-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [csgo_servers-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] u ime korisnika violet [avio...@gmail.com] Poslato: 6. jun 2013 11:38 Za: csgo_servers@list.valvesoftware.com Tema: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

[Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod ... Day 7

2013-06-06 Thread violet
Thank you for the completely useless answers in the past 24 hours.. I will continue to ask the same valid question in the hopes that a member of VALVE will communicate, as requested.. I haven't been frustrated in my tone, I haven't gone "batshit", I don't care to flippantly discuss what "vanilla"

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-05 Thread Andrew Hamming
> ** ** >> >> *From:* csgo_servers-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com [mailto: >> csgo_servers-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] *On Behalf Of *Dusan Tomic >> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 05, 2013 11:53 AM >> *To:* csgo_servers@list.valvesoftware.com >> *Subject:* [Csgo_servers]

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-05 Thread Gordon Reynolds
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 05, 2013 11:53 AM > *To:* csgo_servers@list.valvesoftware.com > *Subject:* [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod > > ** ** > > Vanilla term is used commonly in developing communities since long time > ago... it's not only about CSGO servers... i

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-05 Thread Mike Didiano
lf Of Dusan Tomic Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 11:53 AM To: csgo_servers@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod Vanilla term is used commonly in developing communities since long time ago... it's not only about CSGO servers... it's about any software

[Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-05 Thread Dusan Tomic
:44 Za: csgo_servers@list.valvesoftware.com Tema: Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod Oh really? Thanks for clarifying that LOL. Refer back to the line where it was stated that when milk and ice are combined, it doesn't magically create the flavor of vanilla. Which means, since the obvious needs to be explained

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-05 Thread Erik-jan Riemers
: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod Oh really? Thanks for clarifying that LOL. Refer back to the line where it was stated that when milk and ice are combined, it doesn't magically create the flavor of vanilla. Which means, since the obvious needs to be explained, if a server is a clean install, it i

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-05 Thread Michael Loveless
Techgunner, we have been running SourceMod Anti Cheat on our servers since last week's update as an alternative so that we are at least somewhat protected. We have a good amount of admins fortunately so we pretty much have someone on the server all day to help govern. The minor glitches with SMAC,

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-05 Thread Michael Loveless
Oh really? Thanks for clarifying that LOL. Refer back to the line where it was stated that when milk and ice are combined, it doesn't magically create the flavor of vanilla. Which means, since the obvious needs to be explained, if a server is a clean install, it is not vanilla, since a flavor (addo

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-05 Thread Marcin Paterek
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=vanilla Vanilla means normal server without any add-ons. 2013/6/5 Michael Loveless > Techgunner, we have been running SourceMod Anti Cheat on our servers since > last week's update as an alternative so that we are at least somewhat > protected. We

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-05 Thread Marcin Paterek
The question is DO they consider it as an issue? Vanilla servers work fine, so they can say more or less the same as AlliedModders team — it isn't a bug on our end... 2013/6/5 {{A-BS}} Techgunner > It has been frustrating to say the least. Windows Server Administrators > have two choices. Eith

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-05 Thread {{A-BS}} Techgunner
It has been frustrating to say the least. Windows Server Administrators have two choices. Either run the server(s) in Insecured Mode which results in loss of players due to risk of hackers, or run the server in VAC and not be able to use Admin plugins that have been configured to administrate t

Re: [Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-05 Thread mi...@hs-s.com
Hey, just wait maybe 12 hours. In the past valve released a CS:GO patch on wednesday - in germany for example on ca. at 2am on thursday! i dont know if there will be a patch today but i expect an update/patch today! Am 05.06.2013 11:56, schrieb violet: As the Valve update and the second upda

[Csgo_servers] VAC vs. Sourcemod

2013-06-05 Thread violet
As the Valve update and the second update to fix VAC security has failed and Allied Modders says "This is a bug on Valve's end, we will not be addressing it directly at this time.", what is the timing on Valve fixing their issue? It's 6 days later and whenever asked, Valve response is quiet.. PLEA