From: Pat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 10:16 PM
Subject: [css-d] site check please
Hello,
Could someone have a look at a site that I've rebuilt. It is my first
attempt at a proper website since starting to learn XHTML and CSS last
year.
I've put the complete site here
http://www.eystein.no/test/OR/fluid.html
I think I can live with really large fontsizes not working to well, this is
a rather hasty project. But -
Opera8.5 is not displaying the menu right, any idea why?
and IE7b totally messes up everything too. I think it's time for me to start
paying
Eystein Alnaes wrote:
http://www.eystein.no/test/OR/fluid.html
http://www.eystein.no/test/OR/fluid.html
I think I can live with really large fontsizes not working to well,
this is a rather hasty project. But -
Opera8.5 is not displaying the menu right, any idea why?
and IE7b
Eystein Alnaes wrote:
I'd just like to know how this looks on Windows, perticulary on IE. Tryed to
add IE/win filters/hacks from memory, but aren't able to check it without my
windowsbox.
I've used two things in perticular:
- min-width for IE with css only (please don't mind the extra
imprimerie-print wrote:
I'm a long time listener of this list and I have written my first web site.
I've tested it on windows and linux browsers but I would be very
thankfull if someone could have a look at it on mac and tell me if
something goes wrong.
the url:
David Laakso a écrit :
elcome, Eric. You have done well with your first site. There 27 screen
shots here:
http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=254718
From the screen shots it appears to be finel in mac/ie5.2, safari, and
win/ie/2000.
And I saw no significant rendering issues in
Hello list,
I'm a long time listener of this list and I have written my first web site.
I've tested it on windows and linux browsers but I would be very
thankfull if someone could have a look at it on mac and tell me if
something goes wrong.
the url:
Rachel wrote:
#1) Site check for http://queen.greysky-morning.com/
please. I'm aware of IE's inability to display the
transparent PNG used for my header. Also, the header's
position is off in my Firefox (vs 1.5.0.3), but not in my friend's. It
looks like
Rachel wrote:
http://queen.greysky-morning.com/
I'm aware of IE's inability to display the transparent PNG used for
my header.
Well, a 32bit png isn't necessary in this case, IMO, and IE/win displays
8bits png just fine.
Example ( your page in IE ): http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/alien/pib.png
On 06/05/24 09:12 (GMT-0400) imprimerie-print apparently typed:
David Laakso a écrit :
http://www.affaire-imprimerie.com/index.html
A few suggestions;
--The visited link states(vertical and horizontal menus) could use a bit
more contrast. And since you do have a horiz nav, I did not
Basically I want to have an image across the top of the content area as
shown on the test page. However, the live site is of a fluid design and
I am wondering if there is any way to accomplish a fluid design while
having a top image. I imagine way to do this is to have the image much
wider
Robert O'Rourke wrote:
[...I would really
appreciate it if anyone could have a look on mac browsers and earlier IE
versions.
http://www.1850.co.uk/
Rob
The text-links for 'site map,' and 'skip nav' only appear at extreme
font re-sizing; and, since they are white on
On 18/05/06, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert O'Rourke wrote:
[...I would really
appreciate it if anyone could have a look on mac browsers and earlier IE
versions.
http://www.1850.co.uk/
Rob
FYI here is a very useful URL:
http://www.danvine.com/icapture/
Thanks a bundle to everyone =]
The screen shots provided by David Laasko all look good to me, there's a
bit of a width issue on the product boxes in IE5.0 but it's still set
out like a list so i'm going to treat that as 'acceptable' for now.
I can't believe i forgot about those site map and
Andree Hollander wrote:
Here's a screen shot from Mac OS X 10.4, Netscape 7.2.
Overall it looks very nice, but the last item on the left (Home Page
Featured Items) has too little room. And I think it is strange that
the tooltips on the links have the same text at the items themselves.
Thanks for the help, Ian, Bill and Georg.
Bill, you did me a massive favor by pointing out how my site failed
the validators. I have the entire site passing CSS validation and
every page passes markup validation, except for my pages with a
sample player. The validator doesn't like any of
Rella Abernathy wrote:
The divs in my contact form line up perfectly in Safari.
[...]
http://robabernathy.com/contact.png
But in other browsers, they don't line up properly. Is there a way to
lay this out where it will line up consistently in the non-IE
browsers, like Firefox, Opera,
I'm about finished with this site and I've been working on a
Mac, so I could really use some feedback on Windows. I've
checked the site on Safari, Netscape, Firefox and iCab. I'm
not a web developer at all and am just doing my best to try
to kluge this all together.
[snip]
Everything
Nor sure whether you have done some work on this but cannot
see where Bill gets 57 markup errors. I was intrigued and had
a look see. I found 3!! and all the same error.
[snip]
Whilst I agree with Bill that it is good practice to have
good markup it depends what markup error there is
One thing I notice (Maxthon - IE6) is that if the font is set to
Largest, your top menu wraps the CONTACT link onto a second row. I guess
this is due to the fixed width of your content column.
Regards,
James Hebben
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
On 3 May 2006, at 08:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I notice (Maxthon - IE6) is that if the font is set to
Largest, your top menu wraps the CONTACT link onto a second row. I
guess
this is due to the fixed width of your content column.
Regards,
James Hebben
On 3 May 2006, at 08:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing I notice (Maxthon - IE6) is that if the font is set to
Largest, your top menu wraps the CONTACT link onto a second row. I
guess
this is due to the fixed width of your content column.
Thanks James,
I've made a
On 06/04/27 08:55 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed:
Please review the following site:
http://ancientstones.com
Suggestions and comments welcomed.
Nice. But, those using sidebars are likely not to appreciate it so much.
It requires a lot of viewport width or a smallish default text size to
tedd wrote:
Hi gang:
Please review the following site:
http://ancientstones.com
Suggestions and comments welcomed.
Thank you.
tedd
Sweet!
Has David Laakso seen this site?
Nothing constructive to add, however, some of your images seem to need
the background changed to match the
At 8:20 PM +0530 4/27/06, Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
tedd wrote:
Hi gang:
Please review the following site:
http://ancientstones.com
Suggestions and comments welcomed.
Thank you.
tedd
Sweet!
Has David Laakso seen this site?
Interesting that you should ask -- he's provided much design
At 9:54 AM -0400 4/27/06, Felix Miata wrote:
On 06/04/27 08:55 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed:
Please review the following site:
http://ancientstones.com
Suggestions and comments welcomed.
Nice. But, those using sidebars are likely not to appreciate it so much.
It requires a lot of
At 1:23 PM -0400 4/27/06, David Laakso wrote:
On 06/04/27 08:55 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed:
Okay, what would be a good maximum width measurement (in pixels)?
Thanks.
tedd
I prefer 780 min with 1200 max feeding same to the 'evil one' with
'ie expressions. Felix will, I hope, provide the
The main page title bar says Ancient Title. Think you mean Tile :)
On 4/27/06 5:55 AM, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang:
Please review the following site:
http://ancientstones.com
Suggestions and comments welcomed.
Thank you.
tedd
Okay, what would be a good maximum width measurement (in pixels)?
Some may disagree with this, but I try to aim at using WebTV's (MSN TV)
browser's usable screen area as a max measurement: 544 for the width (I
haven't succeeded with all my pages yet). As we all know, it is hard,
really, to
On 4/27/06, David Merchant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
a max measurement: 544 for the width
TTFN,
David
/snip
8^O
544!? Max!? Wow! What's that look like at a 1600x1200+ resolution?
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
On 06/04/27 12:32 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed:
At 9:54 AM -0400 4/27/06, Felix Miata wrote:
On 06/04/27 08:55 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed:
Please review the following site:
http://ancientstones.com
Suggestions and comments welcomed.
Nice. But, those using sidebars are likely
I suspect the large font size must be due to selecting Georgia as the
first choice?
Just a question, as a newbie ( still! ), what does the lge class do; as in
...span class=lge nbsp;|nbsp; /span...
I didn't see it defined in either style sheet?
Really liked the clean design, especially after
8^O
544!? Max!? Wow! What's that look like at a 1600x1200+ resolution?
Well, I actually try to make them fluid, so for larger resolutions the
sites don't look bad, but 'tis hard to make sites completely fluid (at
least for me) and so at some point when reducing window down, the page
isn't
-Original Message-
From: tedd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:55 AM
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com
Hi gang:
Please review the following site:
http://ancientstones.com
Suggestions and
At 3:59 PM -0400 4/27/06, Tom Livingston wrote:
On 4/27/06, David Merchant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
a max measurement: 544 for the width
TTFN,
David
/snip
8^O
544!? Max!? Wow! What's that look like at a 1600x1200+ resolution?
I personally think that in trying to accommodate the
Felix hath said:
Okay, what would be a good maximum width measurement (in pixels)?
None. Let it be whatever size it needs to be.
-snip (good stuff) --
Those adjustments may very well including permitting a reduced width, in
order to allow a squeeze in place of a scroll for viewers with
On 4/27/06, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
only 20 percent of the viewing audience has a screen size of 800 x 600 and
that figure is dropping at a rate of 5 percent per six months (10 percent per
year).
As such, in two years, the narrow-screen user number will drop below a
detectable amount.
Ted,
Nice job on this site. Here is what I like and what I suggest IMHO
What I like (strengths):
1. Color choices and blending is easy on the eyes.
2. Clean design, not a lot of clutter and overload of useless content.
3. Catalog form is concise and clear.
What I suggest:
1. older 12 Laptop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wondering if you all had suggestions for my site.
I am especially worried about how it looks in IE.
http://www.ohdivine.com
http://www.ohdivine.com/ohdivine.css
Your page layout relies heavily on fixed positioning.
IE/Win 7 does not support position:fixed.
I
On 06/04/17 04:40 (GMT-0400) Spike apparently typed:
I wonder if somebody could please have a look and see what a Mac will make
of it please.
The URL is http://tenbus.co.uk/index.php .
Any other comments welcome.
Fine simplicity!
http://www.snugtech.com/safaritest/ will give you a look on
Webadmin - Tenbus wrote:
The URL is http://tenbus.co.uk/index.php .
If IEMac is required,
div.thumb { ...
/*\*//*/ width: 100px; /**/
}
this would prevent the floating thumbs in gallery from taking 100% of
the width, as 'float' does not shrink-wrap here. I guess this
Nothing to do with mac, but some of your images could be made a bit
smaller for download without losing too much quality?
Russ
On 17 Apr 2006, at 9:40, Webadmin - Tenbus wrote:
I wonder if somebody could please have a look and see what a Mac
will make
of it please.
The URL is
At 9:40 AM +0100 4/17/06, Webadmin - Tenbus wrote:
Hello!
I'm just about to release a redesigned site to the eagerly waiting world.
I've checked it in FF, IE, Moz, and Opera, all running under WinXP. With the
exception that IE6.0 does not understand max-width, it seems to work as I
intend.
I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ingo Chao
Sent: 17 April 2006 11:11
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check on Mac please
Webadmin - Tenbus wrote:
The URL is http://tenbus.co.uk/index.php .
If IEMac is required
Webadmin - Tenbus wrote:
The URL is http://tenbus.co.uk/index.php .
Any other comments welcome.
Spike
Simple is extremely hard to do. You've done it well. Neat stuff on
Linux-- no Mac, here.
In keeping with that, if you state the font-family in the body it will
inherit. No need to
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russell Baldwin
Sent: 17 April 2006 11:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check on Mac please
Nothing to do with mac, but some of your images could be made
Webadmin - Tenbus wrote:
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ingo Chao
The URL is http://tenbus.co.uk/index.php .
If IEMac is required,
div.thumb { ...
/*\*//*/ width: 100px; /**/
}
...
May I ask how this hack (if I may call it that) works! I've searched the
wiki
Felix wrote:
Fine simplicity!
http://www.snugtech.com/safaritest/ will give you a look on Safari any time.
By adding 'body {font-size: 100%;}' you'll avoid IE user complaints from
their choice of text size settings other than medium. See:
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=UsingEms
#leftnav
Comments in-line below Tedd!
-Original Message-
From: tedd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 April 2006 14:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check on Mac please
1. The size of the images are much larger than they should be. Check out
-Original Message-
From: ~davidLaakso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 April 2006 16:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: CSS Discussion
Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check on Mac please
Simple is extremely hard to do. You've done it well. Neat stuff on
Linux-- no Mac, here.
Many thanks
Webadmin - Tenbus wrote:
Simple is extremely hard to do. You've done it well. Neat stuff on
Linux-- no Mac, here.
I've incorporated all your kind suggestions, I even made the nav links into
a ul.
re:http://tenbus.co.uk/index.php .
Lists are automatically indented from the
Erin Spangler wrote:
Besides IE's destruction, could I get a site check of the index page
as well as the Dog Products page?
http://www.frr.thedogsonline.com
Erin Spangler
I don't have IE now Erin, but a quick look at the code shows that adding
this to your css will defeat the IE
Erin Spangler wrote:
http://www.frr.thedogsonline.com
I'm sure that I need some sort of box model IE hack to force IE to
display the content along side the floated right column, but I don't
know which one I need. I try to design as hack-less as possible,
but IE makes it darn near
Hi Robert
I had a look at the site and clicked around. Basically no problems
that I could see.
Platform:
Mac OS X 10.4.6
Browsers / Test results:
Safari v2.0.3 (417.9.2) / No noticeable problems
Firefox v1.5.0.2 / No noticeable problems
Camino 1.0 / No noticeable problems
Opera 8.54 / No
Tim (The Site Doctor) wrote:
my client from last week is still
complaining about problems with his site www.avciarchitects.com.
You should ask him what issues exactly he is speaking of, if he is using
the internet or firefox, what resolution, which page ...
I don't expect that the scattered
Hi Ingo,
I've already asked him to find out what the environment the errors are
occurring in but have just had the response PC, with Firefox, Explorer, and
Navigator which isn't very useful. I'm currently waiting on more
information.
He did mention a script error -I'm assuming that was one
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.ninaza.com
I know I've got an issue with Opera and the Suckerfish dropdowns (I
need an explicit width on the LI's , I believe)
Compared Opera 8.5 9tp2 to Firefox 1.5.0.1 and IE6. Couldn't see any
differences regarding the menu or any other parts of that
looks good
http://www.stevekarsch.com/temp/newscreen.jpg
steve
Christine Ce wrote:
On 4/15/06, Philippe Wittenbergh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The classic IE mac problem...
snip
There is a way to solve this:
.portfolio-thumbnail {
float: left;
width:1px;
Thanks everyone for your help.
:-)
Christine
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ --
Ryan,
On Apr 12, 2006, at 2:15 PM, Ryan Brunsvold wrote:
Requesting a site check (excluding menu - which is linked to the old,
table-based site and should be ignored) for the following site:
Site: http://www.baycreek.net/newest.html
CSS: http://www.baycreek.net/newest.css
Having a few
Bill,
On Apr 13, 2006, at 1:58 PM, Bill Brown/Jessica Weinberg wrote:
The link:
http://www.macnimble.com
The text sizing issue has been fixed in Internet Explorer...
Thanks for using the default font size. It makes your site much easier
to read. I have low vision, and my default font
From: Stephanie Chausse
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 10:03 AM
http://www.provlib.org/ppl/about/about.html
one I'd like comments on is the breadcrumbs-position of
them-does it make the page too cluttered up there with the
searches?-Does it
make the navigation any better? The page below
On 14.04.2006 17:03, Stephanie Chausse wrote:
I posted this site a couple weeks ago and got some great comments-thanks
again-wondering if anyone would give another quick look-all css is valid;
still have a few html errors and I am not sure how to fix-those are below if
anyone has any thought
Stephanie Chausse wrote:
I posted this site a couple weeks ago and got some great comments-thanks
again-wondering if anyone would give another quick look..]
http://www.provlib.org/ppl/about/about.html
Stephanie Chausse
Uwe answered the validation questions.
As far as the rest is
Christine,
I posted a couple screenshots for you (Mac IE 5.2.3):
http://www.stevekarsch.com/temp/screen1.jpg
http://www.stevekarsch.com/temp/screen2.jpg
hope that helps...
steve
Christine Ce wrote:
Hello,
Could someone please have a look at this page in Mac Explorer?
Thanks for that Stephen, it does help.
Anyone got any idea why this might be happening?
The css files are here:
www.wuongean.com/beta/wuongean2collayout.css
www.wuongean.com/beta/wuongeangeneralstyles.css
Thanks in advance for any advice.
Christine
On 4/15/06, Stephen Karsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 15, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Christine Ce wrote:
Could someone please have a look at this page in Mac Explorer?
www.wuongean.com/beta/index.htm
It looks fine in Firefox and Windows Explorer, but am told that in
IE on Mac
the thumbnails are lower down on the page.
The classic IE mac
On 4/15/06, Philippe Wittenbergh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The classic IE mac problem...
snip
There is a way to solve this:
.portfolio-thumbnail {
float: left;
width:1px; white-space:nowrap; /* add this */
}
You cannot show this to other browsers...
* htmlbody
Ryan Brunsvold wrote:
Requesting a site check (excluding menu - which is linked to the old,
table-based site and should be ignored) for the following site:
Site: http://www.baycreek.net/newest.html
CSS: http://www.baycreek.net/newest.css
Having a few display problems in Safari.
Sorry, no
On 06/04/13 13:58 (GMT-0400) Bill Brown/Jessica Weinberg apparently typed:
http://www.macnimble.com
When I select your extra large text option, your 'BODY.textXL
{font-size: 16px;}' rule gives me 9.6pt text, 64% of my default size.
Why isn't extra large text larger than my default?
--
Have
Bill Brown/Jessica Weinberg wrote:
I've made some adjustments to my previous Holy Grail Template. Love to get
some feedback if ya get a chance.http://www.macnimble.com
The text sizing issue has been fixed in Internet Explorer, but I haven't
tested it in anything lower than IE6.
Hmm. I not so
Kenny Meyers escribió:
www.rejeducation.com - Works in IE 6, Works in Opera 8, in Firefox however
the menu seems to do stretch across the screen even though I've specified
the width of the Div and have it floating left. Any help would be greatly
appreciated.
Change in your css !-- List
Ryan Brunsvold wrote:
Hi again everyone,
Requesting a site check (excluding menu - which is linked to the old,
table-based site and should be ignored) for the following site:
Site: http://www.baycreek.net/newest.html
CSS: http://www.baycreek.net/newest.css
I think you'll need a
On 06/04/11 01:29 (GMT-0400) Jonathan Mao apparently typed:
http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/
What do you mean by mousetype?
Mousetype is slang for any text that is significantly smaller than the
user default. Opinions on the size threshhold vary, but generally begin
at somewhere around
That vertical-align trick did the job on the header. Thank you very
much... I was definately stuck.
Now I only have to get the bug out of the navigation footer. Do you or
anyone else have any ideas on how to fix that?
Here is the html in question:
div id=wrapper-nav-footer
Hi again
The page also seems to look weird in Opera 8.54 (Mac)
I'm looking into it now... but if you have any ideas... :-)
Cheers
Jonno
On 10/04/2006, at 9:42 PM, Jonathan Mao wrote:
Hi all
I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered...
I'm having trouble with the
Jonathan Mao wrote:
Hi all
I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered...
I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with IE
6 / Win
http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/
The layout should look like this:
On 11/04/2006, at 2:56 AM, ~davidLaakso wrote:
Jonathan Mao wrote:
Hi all
I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered...
I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with
IE 6 / Win
http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/
The layout should look
Jonathan Mao wrote:
Hi all
I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered...
I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with IE
6 / Win
http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/
The layout should look like this:
On 11/04/2006, at 11:06 AM, ~davidLaakso wrote:
Jonathan Mao wrote:
Hi all
I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered...
I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with
IE 6 / Win
http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/
The layout should look
The problem has been resolved.
Thanks to David and Felix for their help.
Cheers
Jonno
On 11/04/2006, at 11:06 AM, ~davidLaakso wrote:
Jonathan Mao wrote:
Hi all
I hate to trouble for something that has no doubt been covered...
I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when
Jonathan Mao wrote:
On 11/04/2006, at 11:06 AM, ~davidLaakso wrote:
Jonathan Mao wrote:
I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed with
IE 6 / Win
http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/
The layout should look like this:
On 11/04/2006, at 2:38 PM, ~davidLaakso wrote:
Jonathan Mao wrote:
On 11/04/2006, at 11:06 AM, ~davidLaakso wrote:
Jonathan Mao wrote:
I'm having trouble with the display of the footer when viewed
with IE 6 / Win
http://www.intrinsicdigital.com/test/
The layout should look like
Aaron Roberson wrote:
I have cutomized a jumpstart template from Community MX and everything
is looking great in Firefox, but with two little caviets in IE6.
The sample web page:
http://www.whitehorsemedia.com/test.cfm
In IE there is a space between the header and the main navigation bar
On 4/2/06, Holly Bergevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Clayton Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've made [] changes in an effort to become
better friends with IE:
http://www.filmtreks.com
A brief examination in IE6 (and Firefox) reveal a nice looking page with
no apparent float-dropping on
On 06/03/30 08:51 Dominique Papin apparently typed:
Please take a look at this : http://aspspider.net/cegepdom/
When I try I get Service Unavailable on an otherwise blank page.
--
Blessed are they whose ways are blameless, who walk according
to the law of the Lord.Psalm
Very sorry, that's what i get for using free hosting
Tried another server (which is working atm)
homepage:
http://www22.brinkster.com/elorad/cegepdom/
inside page (others arent on server):
http://www22.brinkster.com/elorad/cegepdom/repere.html
CSS:
Clayton Farr wrote:
http://www.filmtreks.com/
It seems like there are still some odd things going on in various flavors of
Interet Exploer (which I initally posted about here -
http://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/72565? .)
Seems so, sorry best I can offer are captures:
Thanks David. I really appreciate it. That's great to see - although a
little disheartening... I'm going to try plugging in a couple of patches
shortly. With any luck, maybe they'll catch most of these layout issues in
IE.
Best,
Clayton
On 3/30/06, ~davidLaakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clayton
francky wrote:
Brian Funk wrote:
Keith Kaiser wrote:
OK! It's done.
help me out by taking a look and giving me some feedback.
http://kaiserklan.com/roundtable
on WinXP IE6:
.
5.
In general, be carefull with colored words on colored backgrounds.
There has to
Keith Kaiser wrote:
OK! It's done. I've checked it in Safari (developed on OSX), on
FireFox and in Linux, but not on Win IE, so please be kind if you find
a problem. This is a 100% CSS site with just enough .PHP to switch
pages, a complete rewrite from a very table oriented web page.
This is
~davidLaakso wrote:
Keith Kaiser wrote:
OK! It's done. I've checked it in Safari (developed on OSX), on
FireFox and in Linux, but not on Win IE, so please be kind if you find
a problem. This is a 100% CSS site with just enough .PHP to switch
pages, a complete rewrite from a very table
I want to send out a big how how to all the people who offered
advise, sent code pieces, or just looked at my site;
http://kaiserklan.com/roundtable I still have a bug or two but its
come a long way thanks to all the support out there.
--
YIS/YIV
Keith D Kaiser -- Venturing Roundtable
Keith Kaiser wrote:
I want to send out a big how how to all the people who offered
advise, sent code pieces, or just looked at my site;
http://kaiserklan.com/roundtable I still have a bug or two but its
come a long way thanks to all the support out there.
You are looking better. I've got
Webmaster wrote:
http://www.deselectdesign.com/test/
Suggestion:
- Try setting 'minimum font size = 32px' in Opera. A bit extreme, but
that option is supposed to make text very readable. It doesn't.
- Try resizing fonts in IE6. Since that won't work; try 'ignore font
size' in IE6. Doesn't work
Mike Davies wrote:
www.integra-server.co.uk/essie/
The page appears correctly in Opera 7.54 and nearly correct in
IE5.0/Windows. There are a couple of things with Firefox :
Comment: those browsers are a bit old now. If Firefox is just as old
then that's probably the reason for those things,
OK! It's done. I've checked it in Safari (developed on OSX), on
FireFox and in Linux, but not on Win IE, so please be kind if you find
a problem. This is a 100% CSS site with just enough .PHP to switch
pages, a complete rewrite from a very table oriented web page.
This is a completely volunteer
Keith Kaiser wrote:
OK! It's done.
help me out by taking a look and giving me some feedback.
http://kaiserklan.com/roundtable
on WinXP IE6:
Your menu is being obscured by the starWrap content below.
http://www.stoneladder.ca/sandbox/temp/rt01.jpg
Brian Funk wrote:
Keith Kaiser wrote:
OK! It's done.
help me out by taking a look and giving me some feedback.
http://kaiserklan.com/roundtable
on WinXP IE6:
Your menu is being obscured by the starWrap content below.
http://www.stoneladder.ca/sandbox/temp/rt01.jpg
Hi all,
My current project is drawing to a close, and my client has taken the 34
(I think, haven't counted recently) sites live. An inspection by the
respected denizens of the list would be appreciated.
Oh, a few quick notes to save wasting people's time: the sites' HTML
doesn't validate
601 - 700 of 1089 matches
Mail list logo
