On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 19:20 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
Package: feynmf
Version: 1.08-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package feynmf in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
[...]
mpost fmfsamp1; mpost fmfsamp2; mpost fmfsamp3; mpost fmfsamp4;
This is
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 17:22 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
/tmp/t2d19264/src/glade_ug.texi:373: Undefined control sequence.
argument @pdfimage
xe-arch.fig.pdf
[...]
Output written on glade_ug.dvi (11 pages, 18936 bytes).
Transcript written on glade_ug.log.
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 05:02 -0800, Arias Hung wrote:
This is a summary of all `failed' messages and warnings:
`pdfetex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex -translate-file=cp227.tcx
*latex.ini' failed
`pdfetex -ini -jobname=etex -progname=etex -translate-file=cp227.tcx
*etex.ini' failed
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 07:27 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Package: tetex-doc
Version: 3.0-11
Severity: serious
The license is clearly non-free:
| All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
| stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any
|
Norbert Preining wrote:
On Don, 12 Jan 2006, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2006-01-02 14:01:17 +0100, Michael Eyrich wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-13
Severity: important
fmtutil fails to generate format file:
fmtutil: running `tex -ini -jobname=xmltex -progname=xmltex
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 00:00 -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
[...]
* use of packages like pxfonts, txfonts, mathpazo or mathptmx.
The pxfonts and txfonts have the disadvantage of being extremly tight.
In some situations, letters can even touch each other.
The good thing of using txfonts is that
[full quote to get back to BTS]
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:50 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Text-extraction from PDF is really complicated. If one adds a few
interesting things (fi, ä, ß) to Frank's test file, one finds that
pdftotext (best used via
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 16:35 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
prefer outlines: `true'.
texhash enabled: `true'.
download standard fonts (dvips): `false'.
download standard fonts (pdftex): `false'.
download standard fonts (dvipdfm): `false'.
[...]
ls -ld /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips
Frank Küster wrote:
Konstantinos Koukopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The CONTEXT distribution that is contained in the above tetex packages
requires the lmodern fonts in EC encoding. Unfortunately the lmodern package
currently in unstable contains the fonts in cork encoding.
It is very
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 15:26 +0100, Ralf Stubner wrote:
This gives us a big problem with the lmodern package. I don't know how
we could update lmodern without updating ConTeXt in the teTeX tree. I am
pretty sure, that current lmodern will *not work* with the ConTeXt in
teTeX 3.0
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 01:50 +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:34:17 +0100
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, we still need the output of \listfiles - or maybe just send the
complete logfile as an attachment, it shouldn't be too big.
attached
Thanks. Just as
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 01:06 +0200, Micha Feigin wrote:
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:14:49 +0100
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. Just as Frank I can't reproduce your problem with the testfile
you provided. Comparing the log files, the main difference I have found
up to now
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 23:13 +0200, Arne Ahrend wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:03:42 +0200
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't, by chance, have backups of the old psfonts_t1.map
and/or of the updmap log file - either as
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.log, or /tmp/updm*? If
Hilmar Preusse wrote:
On 04.10.05 Andrei Emeltchenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
pdflatex refman.tex This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.14159-1.10b-2.1
(Web2C 7.4.5) entering extended mode
(./refman.tex{/usr/share/texmf/pdftex/config/pdftex.cfg} LaTeX2e
2001/06/01 Babel v3.7h and hyphenation
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 12:39 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Sending this mail to the bug for proper archiving.
Thanks, I constantly forget this ...
And /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/dvipdfm/dvipdfm.def
looks like a part of graphics ...
I don't think so:
%% This is file `dvipdfm.def',
%%
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:26 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Usage: a2ping.pl [options] inputfile [[outformat:] outputfile]
Run with --doc to read documentation as a UNIX man(1) page.
This works, so there must be some internal manpage representation in the
sources.
$ pod2man /usr/bin/a2ping
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 19:01 +0200, Arne Ahrend wrote:
Here is tetex-extra-apt.log
===
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
The following NEW packages will be installed:
tetex-extra
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:26 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Usage: a2ping.pl [options] inputfile [[outformat:] outputfile]
Run with --doc to read documentation as a UNIX man(1) page.
This works, so there must be some internal manpage
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 16:36 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I will add it there and chack this in later. BTW, it looks as if
most/all manpages in new-manpages/ are meanwhile in texk/tetex/ and
taken from there. I guess the versions in new-manpages
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 19:15 +0400, Victor Wagner wrote:
On 2005.10.08 at 15:28:39 +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
* add some hacks for tetex 2
May be just add a file into source package, like README.TeTeX-2.0 as
hint for backporters. It seems that we, who use stable with few
backports
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 14:11 +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
On 10.09.05 Hilmar Preusse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Last Remark,
TODO:
Do we have to provide the Adobe Font metrics of the fonts? If yes the
packages providing the sym links has to contain the afm files too,
which are not
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 11:33 +0200, Sebastien Helleu wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-10.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Thanks for reporting. From which version did you upgrade?
download standard fonts (dvips): `false'
download standard fonts (pdftex):
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 13:45 +0200, Sebastien Helleu wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 12:12:51PM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
Thanks for reporting. From which version did you upgrade?
I think from 3.0-10.
Where there any problems with version 3.0-10?
What is
the output of 'ls /etc/texmf
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 14:17 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
Good. Presumably, the problem was located (only) in /etc/texmf/updmap.d/
as suspected by Ralf.
Actually, I suspect that there is a similar situation in
/etc/texmf/texmf.d/, ie, some configuration files from teTeX 2 are still
used. This
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 16:28 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
regarding tetex-bin
a) #78926: If possible, it'd be nice if dvips were a seperate package,
so that users of printfilters, e.g., don't need tetex-bin installed.
[is this really a realistic scenario? How many systems are there
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 17:27 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 04:28:25PM +0200, Frank K??ster wrote:
* advanced scheme
^^^
Additionally, tetex-bin-nox is split into tetex-bin-mini and
tetex-bin-extra (or
Some additions
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 20:40 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
tetex-bin-extra:
omega, aleph, omfonts, odvicopy, odvitype, otangle, otp2ocp, outocp (Omega)
mkocp (Omega)
mpost, mpto, makempx (MetaPost)
dmp dvitomp (MetaPost)
texexec (ConTeXt)
pltotf, tftopl, vftovp, vptovf (TFM
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 20:28 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 16:28 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
- PSNFSS fonts, the CM and EC fonts in Metafont and Type1 format, if
available.
To what extend do we want internationlization? Should people be able to
produce documentation
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 06:33 -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
To: Carsten Heinz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just a reminder. In the last few days there has been a discussion on
comp.text.tex about Carsten Heinz being MIA. Several people have
unsuccessfully tried to reach him. It might be, that
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 19:51 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Do you think it should be possible to have combinations like
tetex-bin, tetex-base plus ConTeXt from texlive?
Would be nice, but not strictly necessary.
Or do you think that
someone will want tetex-extra on top of some parts of
Hi Paul,
thanks for reporting this problem. For whatever reason it didn't reach
our mailing list. I only saw it right now in the web interface. We had
that recently with another bugreport. Maybe these messages are simply to
large for the mailing list software?
Anyway, concerning your bug report.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 15:56 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
mpost,
mpto,
makempx
/usr/bin/makempy (MetaPost)
/usr/bin/mptopdf
I would suggest that MetaPost is now regarded as a core component of a
modern TeX distribution, so I'd suggest keeping it in the core.
Hm, well.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 14:42 +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: normal
Fresh install fails in postinst with:
update-language: cannot read /etc/texmf/language.d/00tex.cnf
However, there is a file called 00tetex.cnf
Odd.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:33 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Unfortunately, latex.info is unmaintained today, and there is little
chance to get the many errors in it fixed. There's a new effort for a
LaTeX online documentation, but unfortunately I cannot remember the
name.
I think you are
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 07:31 +0200, Jean Charles Delépine wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-9
Severity: normal
Thanks for reporting.
Got #334613 bug on upgrade.
/tmp/tetex.updmap.XXQqSsSl said :
[...]
!!! ERROR! The map file `lm.map' has not been found at all.
Either put
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:34 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
I think we had a very long list of TeX-related environment variables
that were all unset in th packages of teTeX-2.0.2. And it seems to me
as if it would be good to do this again. People might still have
problems running latex or
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 14:01 +0200, Jean Charles Delepine wrote:
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait (wrote) :
BUT the lmodern package in sid moves 10lmodern.map out of the way when
removed (remember /var/lib/lmodern/?), therefore the map file shouldn't
be looked for by updmap-sys.
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-8.0.sarge1
Severity: normal
If one uses updmap-sys with --synctrees or --edit (and possible other
options), updmap-sys creates a new updmap.cfg in TEXMFSYSCONFIG/web2c.
With Debian, this is /usr/share/texmf/web2c, ie, TEXMFMAIN/web2c. While
update-updmap creates
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 15:52 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, the behviour of 'updmap-sys --syncwithtrees' is not correct.
Should I make a separate bug for this?
Yes, please.
Done.
Jean-Charles: Do you have a file '/usr/share/texmf/web2c
[moving this to #334747 where I think it belongs.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 17:12 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This should fix everything I am aware of, except maybe the possible mess
caused if you followed the 'updmap-sys --syncwithtrees' advice. I
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 21:23 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way I see it right now, both 'updmap-sys --syncwithtrees' and
'updmap-sys --edit' create '/usr/share/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg'.
Especially the latter is quite likely to be used at some point
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 16:36 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2005-10-19 15:49:07 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
No, it isn't, since 334613 is against 3.0-9, and has only been
introduced by this upload. I don't know what is happening with 2.0.2,
and honestly I won't try to find out, since
On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 23:05 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the case where this started, the user would have been back at 'square
one', since updmap-sys would again try to use the still incorrect
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg and again suggest
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 11:22 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
I fully agree. I may implement that in update-updmap as you suggest,
That would be great.
if I don't feel too dizzy (pretty bad night, ugh...).
I don't think we are in a hurry with this. Especially as fmtutil-sys and
texconfig-sys
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 12:40 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
mfw was the name of the mf binary with X11 support, mf-nowin is the name
without. In 2.0, /usr/bin/mf was a symlink to /usr/bin/mfw, now it the
binary itself is called /usr/bin/mf.
I think this is an upstream change,
Yes, this is an
On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 19:46 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would be great.
Done. I chose to abort to make sure the user will see the message and
not do the same mistake in the future.
Thanks! I haven't tested it yet, but from looking
merge 335055 335065
thanks
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 19:51 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-10) ...
rm: cannot remove `/var/lib/texmf/web2c/*fmt': No such file or
directory
dpkg: error processing tetex-bin (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 21:04 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 08:52:50PM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
You'll need to adjust the severity of 335065 to grave first
before merging.
Thanks.
I'm also seeing problems on upgrades, but the errors are ussually
of my screen
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 15:23 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 08:52:50PM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
Thanks for reporting. This is now fixed in our SVN.
It would be nice if this got uploaded soon, since this is causing
problems on the buildds.
I am not a DD, so I can't
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 18:08 +0200, Lucas Bonnet wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-10
Severity: important
Thanks for reporting.
When I apt-get dist-upgrade, or when I call updmap-sys :
--
updmap-sys: This is updmap-sys, version 1107552857-debian
updmap-sys: using transcript
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 19:08 +0200, Lucas Bonnet wrote:
It was containing bera.map, a package I installed myself. Seems like I
get the same error than Florent mentioned in the link he posted above.
Indeed. In principle, it is always better to use /usr/local/share/texmf
for additions that are
Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ kpsewhich --expand-path=\$TEXMFDIST
/usr/share/texmf-texlive:/usr/share/texmf-tetex
However, it looks as if there are several places in texdoctk where it is
assumed that TEXMFDIST referes to a single directory only. Hence I can't
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 21:42 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
I think we can claim that this will solve the bug; it's not
a nice solution, but I don't see any drawbacks unless someone expects to
be able to copy the texdoctk from a Debian binary package and use it on
a different system.
That is
Frank Küster wrote:
Are you sure? On my system, it works as long as
/usr/share/texmf-texlive does not exist. It doesn't matter whether it
contains anything, just creating the directory breaks texdoctk. But
without it, it works (finds Fundamental/usrguide).
You are right. I was thinking
Frank Küster wrote:
Uwe Kleine-Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moreover both URL that are mentioned in that file don't work for me:
wget -q -O - http://localhost/doc/tetex-doc/texdoc.php
gets the php-script uninterpreted. Probably the file should be guarded
by IfModule php or
Ralf Stubner wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Are you sure? On my system, it works as long as
/usr/share/texmf-texlive does not exist. It doesn't matter whether it
contains anything, just creating the directory breaks texdoctk. But
without it, it works (finds Fundamental/usrguide).
You
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 21:20 +0100, Dieter Schuster wrote:
Package: texlive-base-bin
Version: 2005.dfsg.2-6
Severity: minor
After changing my tex-system from tetex to texlive, the programm
texdoctk does not start anymore. It produces the error messages:
Thanks for your report.
[EMAIL
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 08:23 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
texconfig and therefore the paperconfig hook do *not* control the paper
size that is used for typesetting (i.e. when TeX runs and calculates
where to put the characters relative to the paper origin). It only
takes effect when a
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 00:02 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
In the tpm2deb.cfg it is written:
# collection psutils and ttfutils die, should be proper debian packages
but at least ttfutils seem to be not to go this way. We should include
this in our packages, or create a new binary package
Frank Küster wrote:
The current limitation is pdftex, which can have it's default papersize
changed only by changing pdftexconfig.tex and redumping all formats. The
different pdftexconfig.tex files needed for a4 and letter are hardcoded
into texconfig.
What's the problem? This is the
Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ttfdump (no idea where that comes from, no idea what it is)
It seems to be available only in TeXlive now, not even separately on
CTAN. And the project it was once supposed to be part of of doesn't
seem to exist, and the developer
Norbert Preining wrote:
Please note that ttfdump is NOT build in TeX Live 2005, and it is only
present in the windows part of the tpm file. So I am not convinced that
it builds at all, works at all,...
This is true also for texlive-svn, also there is no ttfdump on linux
binary.
Ok. Thanks
Hi Kęstutis,
in the closing message to this bug you said that the various fonttools
available from URL:http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/fontutils.html are
not actively maintained and that most of their feature are already
available in fontforge. I don't know about the other tools, but I don't
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 19:05 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dvipdfm allready links against libpaper.
Err, right. We probably should disable texconfig dvidpdfm paper,
then.
ACK
Hm, no. Actually things are more complicated, and I'm not sure
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 15:43 +0100, Ralf Stubner wrote:
How about having the original files in TEXMFDIST and change texconfig
such, that it writes the new files to TEXMF(SYS)VAR? That way the user
will not have to deal with the files. But if needed, these files can be
overruled by a file
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 08:29 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Are you talking about dvipdfm or dvips here?
About dvipdfm. I haven't looked at dvips, and it doesn't make sense if
both behave different.
Ok. I was more concerned with dvips here, having put dvipdfm aside as it
already used
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 22:50 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
I don't think this is for etch, though, at least not with very thorough
testing in unstable. Should we start a branch, or only do it when we
actually need a further upload targetted at etch?
This is not for etch (at least I hope that
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 18:13 -0600, Chris Lawrence wrote:
I'm still not sure I did this right to make everything within TeXLive
happy... I copied pdftexconfig.tex into /etc/texmf/tex/generic/config
then hacked it as follows, since none of the obvious approaches
(running texconfig in various
Frank Küster wrote:
Michael Piefel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: texlive-latex-extra
Version: 2005.dfsg.2-2
Severity: normal
texlive-latex-extra claims to contain beamer, but does not.
Ah, interesting. It's texlive-latex-recommended that Recommends:
latex-beamer.
One part of
Frank Küster wrote:
Thanks for noticing. So that makes
--- tpm2deb.cfg (Revision 1941)
+++ tpm2deb.cfg (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -529,6 +529,9 @@
blacklist;tpm;pgf;*
depends;texlive-full;pgf (= 1.01.dfsg.1-1), latex-beamer (=
3.06.dfsg.1-0.1), latex-xcolor (= 2.09-1)
Norbert Preining wrote:
About the splitting, see below. Concerning the bug: You are right. So I
will change the relation from depends to suggests? or recommends? What
do you suggest/recommend for now, without splitting!!?!?
IMHO this depends on whether or not the meta package texlive should be
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 18:57 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
We should really try to come up with a setting for TTFONTS that makes
sense for all Tex packages that use TrueType fonts.
How about
TTFONTS = .;$TEXMF/fonts/truetype//;/usr/share/fonts/truetype//
?
I can't even tell
which those
severity 394167 wishlist
reassign 394167 prosper
merge 394167 349670 392335
thanks
Peter Schueller wrote:
The prosper package cannot be used with texlive at the moment because it
requires tetex-bin which conflicts with texlive.
This is true, but it is a known bug of the prosper package.
I
Frank Küster wrote:
Norbert Preining [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+To override entries in the system wide configuration file
+filetexmf.cnf/file, a user only needs to add lines to
+ttvarHOME/var/.texmf-config/web2c/texmf.cnf/tt.
+Please only add those lines
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 16:05 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One problem is that texmf.cnf is only searched along the compiled in
TEXMFCNF (not TEXMFCONFIG). At least as long as it is not defined in the
environment. So in order for the above to work, one
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 10:48 -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
* Clear up the description about user-specific configuration in
TeX-on-Debian, many thanks to Géraud Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(closes: #396823) [preining,frank]
^^
Wrong bug number. #396826
retitle 396965 ltxtable.sty is missing
reassign 396965 texlive-latex-base
thanks
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 00:04 +0100, Bernard Adrian wrote:
Curve, which belongs to this package, can't work. It requires ltxtable.sty
(of David Carlisle). Since some contribs of D. Carlisle are in
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 21:46 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
I think this makes sense. On critical systems (like buildds), only
teTeX will be installed. Everyone who has (parts of) both will probably
want the newer one in front.
Should we do this for 0.32?
I am in favour of a changed
Michael Biebl wrote:
Package: texlive
Severity: wishlist
The texlive-doc-en package is rather big (~55mb). If you want to install
texlive instead of tetex and with other packages starting to depend on
texlive | tetex-base, you are forced to install the documentation.
It would be great if
Dr. Tilo Levante wrote:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-19
Severity: normal
I use epstopdf in a setuid script (backend for cups, needs access to
some directories), and get the error above.
Solution was to add the line
$ENV{PATH}= /usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin;
in
Frank Küster wrote:
The assumption above is wrong, or at least short-sighted. updmap-sys
and fmtutil-sys can only be called when tetex-bin is there. However, we
*must* call the update script under all circumstances. Otherwise
tetex-bin will be without language information etc. I wonder
Frank Küster wrote:
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand. Shouldn't tetex-bin call the update-* scripts before
generating formats/map files/...
[Looking into common.functions.in]
It seems it doesn't. IMO that's the bigger problem.
I think every package that installs
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 18:12 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, if I understand that correctly, the bug was fixed by running mktexmf
as non-root, and the change of the cache location is only a collateral.
No, or I do not
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 14:48 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where does the input for the cache come from? If the input is always from a
privileged location (i.e., /usr/share, /usr/lib, /etc), then it's possible
-- and, I think, vastly preferable -- to
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 21:13 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
I didn't check the mktexnam code - but I'm a little surprised here. I
wasn't aware of the test for SYSTEXMF, but in case the test fails,
i.e. the input is from a private TEXMF tree, shouldn't the output go to
TEXMFVAR
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 08:07 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Okay, you are right, indeed this check is already done. So we could
gain some additional security by making sure that the SYSTEXMF variable
is not set in the user environment, but only read from the system-wide
texmf.cnf.
That's
Frank Küster wrote:
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ralf, hi Norbert,
Still no answer...
Sorry, this message got pushed pack to deeply due to some email troubles
I had during the last few days. Never reboot the wrong server without
thinking :-(
Should we just go on and let
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 10:20 +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
Package: texlive-base-bin
Version: 2005.dfsg.1-1
Severity: important
I installed fpl-neu from this WWW-site to /usr/local/share/texmf :
http://home.vrweb.de/~was/x/FPL/
Then I run commands texhash and updmap-sys --enable
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 19:03 +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006, +13:33:07 EEST (UTC +0300),
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] pressed some keys:
This and the log from updmap-sys clearly shows that fp9.map has not been
used.
Juhapekka: Is fp9.map mentioned
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 12:01 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
However,
--disable does not work, it still gives the same error.
That's odd. I just tried
updmap-sys --enable Map foo.map
= file not found error
updmap-sys --disable foo.map
= everything fine
I did call 'updmap-sys --disable Map
On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 23:14 +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
On Fri, 06 Oct 2006, +22:36:51 EEST (UTC +0300),
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] pressed some keys:
Of course, it would be interesting to
know where the file in /etc/texmf/web2c came from. Did you call
'updmap-sys --edit
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 08:44 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Benjamin Leipold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 3.0-23
Severity: wishlist
Is there any possibility to include pdftricks int tetex-extra?
No, teTeX is dead upstream. However, it's successor, TeXlive,
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 11:07 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote:
Debain TeX team: Would it make sense to implement a check in the
update-* programs that looks for files in /e/t/web2c and prints out a
big fat warning in case one is found?
Actually there already exists such a sanity check in update
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 17:34 +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
Here is that old file /etc/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg :
### This file was automatically generated by update-updmap.
Ok, so this file was originally installed in /var/lib/texmf/web2c where
it belongs.
[...]
### From file:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:00 +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Relevant log message seems to be:
(/usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx
! LaTeX must be made using an initex with no format preloaded.
l.78 ... using an initex with no format preloaded}
This happens after fmtutil calls
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 23:46 +0400, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:07:33 +0200 Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like the 40jadetex.cnf.dpkg-new is there because jadetex cannot jet
be configured and so the old version of the config file is still used.
Yes, this is
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 17:31 +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
I also installed packages texlive-lang-french and texlive-lang-italian .
A file called /var/lib/texmf/tex/generic/config/language.dat was not
properly generated.
In what sense was it not properly generated? How did you determin
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 12:55 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
reassign 388399 tetex-bin
Bug#388399: mktexmf: line 92: mf31966.tmp: Permission denied on alpha,
mips and mipsel
Bug reassigned from package `gnuplot' to `tetex-bin'.
Hm. It's not a general mipsel/alpha/mips problem. At least
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 03:18 +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/juhtolv % tree .texmf*
.texmf-var
|-- fonts
| `-- tfm
| `-- jknappen
| `-- ec
`-- web2c
|-- latex.fmt
|-- latex.log
|-- pdflatex.fmt
`-- pdflatex.log
As you found
Frank Küster wrote:
purge)
+update-texmf
Shouldn't that be
update-texmf || true
? The rest looks fine to me.
cheerio
ralf
1 - 100 of 451 matches
Mail list logo
