Re: [FlexJS] More event issues

HI, > The problem is that the signature of public function > dispatchEvent(event:Event):Boolean does not work unless flash.events.Event is > specifically specified. I’ve also seen this but it compiles and works fine when I run it. Thanks, Justin

Re: [FlexJS] More event issues

I'm almost at the point where you can try the dual branch, which should in theory take care of this. -Alex On 3/2/17, 2:12 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >I’m struggling with IEventDispatcher. > >I have event proxies which dispatch events from event dispatchers. For >this to work,

[FlexJS] More event issues

I’m struggling with IEventDispatcher. I have event proxies which dispatch events from event dispatchers. For this to work, the pseudo-event dispatcher implements IEventDispatcher, but does not inherit for EventDispatcher. It implements its own dispatchEvent(). The problem is that the signature

Re: [VSCode, NextGenAS] Issues with IntelliSense, Goto Definition (Ctrl+Click) and auto imports

On 2/16/17, 7:34 AM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: > >One thing worth mentioning is that you cannot go to classes that come from >SWC files (including framework classes in the SDK). Sometimes, SWC files >include the original source path, but I've noticed that it's almost always

Re: [VSCode, NextGenAS] Issues with IntelliSense, Goto Definition (Ctrl+Click) and auto imports

ding of 'source-path' in this case? > > Thank you! > > Olaf > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-flex- > development.247.n4.nabble.com/VSCode-NextGenAS-Issues- > with-IntelliSense-Goto-Definition-Ctrl-Click-and- > auto-imports-tp59541p59547.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: [VSCode, NextGenAS] Issues with IntelliSense, Goto Definition (Ctrl+Click) and auto imports

t is your understanding of 'source-path' in this case? Thank you! Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/VSCode-NextGenAS-Issues-with-IntelliSense-Goto-Definition-Ctrl-Click-and-auto-imports-tp59541p59547.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mai

Re: [VSCode, NextGenAS] Issues with IntelliSense, Goto Definition (Ctrl+Click) and auto imports

apache-flex- > development.247.n4.nabble.com/VSCode-NextGenAS-Issues- > with-IntelliSense-Goto-Definition-Ctrl-Click-and- > auto-imports-tp59541p59542.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: [VSCode, NextGenAS] Issues with IntelliSense, Goto Definition (Ctrl+Click) and auto imports

-- View this message in context: http://apache-flex- development.247.n4.nabble.com/VSCode-NextGenAS-Issues- with-IntelliSense-Goto-Definition-Ctrl-Click-and-auto-imports-tp59541.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VSCode, NextGenAS] Issues with IntelliSense, Goto Definition (Ctrl+Click) and auto imports

-- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/VSCode-NextGenAS-Issues-with-IntelliSense-Goto-Definition-Ctrl-Click-and-auto-imports-tp59541p59542.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[VSCode, NextGenAS] Issues with IntelliSense, Goto Definition (Ctrl+Click) and auto imports

ally adds xmlns declarations." -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/VSCode-NextGenAS-Issues-with-IntelliSense-Goto-Definition-Ctrl-Click-and-auto-imports-tp59541.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Click event issues in Android build

? There might be a runtime error on Android only, and the debugger can show you exactly where it's thrown. - Josh On Dec 8, 2016 5:26 AM, "griffo" <shaug...@nxtgig.com> wrote: Hi new to this forum. Flex mobile app iOS build is working well but when compiled for Android there are m

Click event issues in Android build

Hi new to this forum. Flex mobile app iOS build is working well but when compiled for Android there are many issues which seem to be caused by events that don't complete. Some code runs while other code doesn't and this is for a MouseEvent.CLICK event, animation or other custom events. I've

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

On 11/1/16, 5:15 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >We still don’t have a reply from OpenFL or FlatUI. At this point given >it's been 3-4 weeks I don’t think we’ll get a reply. I'm on the fence about how much to bug them about this. I'd much rather we just not do

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

Hi, We still don’t have a reply from OpenFL or FlatUI. At this point given it's been 3-4 weeks I don’t think we’ll get a reply. Thanks, Justin

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

On 10/21/16, 9:59 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >> Can you tell if the lights are even on in these communities? I know we >> aren't always that responsive to new issues ourselves. > >For FlatUI I would say there’s no

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

Hi, > Can you tell if the lights are even on in these communities? I know we > aren't always that responsive to new issues ourselves. For FlatUI I would say there’s not much activity so we’re unlikely to get a response. > Still trying to get a response from my legal department. My e

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

On 10/21/16, 5:56 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >> I'd give them more than a week to respond. > >Another week has passed and no response. Can you tell if the lights are even on in these communities? I know we aren't always that

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

Hi, > I'd give them more than a week to respond. Another week has passed and no response. > I have not contacted CreateJS, but have started the process of getting > approved by Adobe folks to contact them. Any progress? Given the software is already under an Apache license and everyone has

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

On 10/13/16, 11:55 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >So I contacted both parties with pull requests a week ago and have >received no reply. > >For FlatUI that's not so surprising as there was no reply to another >licensing question asked by Alex way back in March and

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

Hi, So I contacted both parties with pull requests a week ago and have received no reply. For FlatUI that's not so surprising as there was no reply to another licensing question asked by Alex way back in March and there very little activity on the project. The pull request contains a LICENSE

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

n this community. I think we'd all experience less frustration if you would focus the time you spend at Apache Flex on the issues on which we share values. That way your reputation will build as "the guy who helps keep us from making a big mistake" instead of "the guy who is too picky about stuff that doesn't matter that much". Thanks, -Alex

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

At this point we are going around in circles. Justin, if you can simply send a PR with a short explanation of why this is important to you, maybe they will just merge the PR. Let's not try to game out all the possibilities beforehand. Thanks, Om On Oct 6, 2016 9:49 AM, "Justin Mclean"

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

Hi, > IMO, you have the option of not contacting them and not adding the > headers. If we don’t contact them then we need to add the headers again as stated on legal discuss. > I think more Flex PMC members would prefer that we simply don't do > anything about missing headers Several PMC

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

ls of licenses and headers seems to be one of your passions, but I don't think that passion is shared by most Flex community members and in fact frustration has been expressed on several occasions. I personally do appreciate it when you find the big-ticket issues, but missing headers is not one of th

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

On Oct 6, 2016 8:09 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > Hi, > > My intention was never to throw weight around. So just so everyone is clear on the course of action if I approach them as an individual it’s IMO very likely that I will get no response and that means as per the

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

Hi, My intention was never to throw weight around. So just so everyone is clear on the course of action if I approach them as an individual it’s IMO very likely that I will get no response and that means as per the discussion on legal discuss we need to add the headers. The ONLY case where we

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

bs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2016 07:58:32 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues > > I would also prefer that Justin contact them as an individual. I think it’s > less confrontational. I se

AW: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2016 07:58:32 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues I would also prefer that Justin contact them as an individual. I think it’s less confrontational. I see no reason to do so as “an official representative of

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

I would also prefer that Justin contact them as an individual. I think it’s less confrontational. I see no reason to do so as “an official representative of the PMC”. I see no benefit in doing so. On Oct 4, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > Are other PMC members ok with

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

Hi, Anyone else have anything to add before I start working on this? Thanks, Justin

RE: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

IMHO if their project is licensed and their individual files are not licensed it's a non-issue at least as that is concerned. If what was said was true about just using a snippet and I'm understanding this thread correctly, then let's give them a attribution / reference back to the source and

AW: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

+1 to let Justin proceed as he suggested. Chris Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2016 09:21:22 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues On 10/3/16, 3:30 PM, "Justin M

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

On 10/3/16, 3:30 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> But if you are going to do something, it should be what is recommended > >I am doing what is recommend by policy and consensus on legal discuss. Roy says we can distribute the work if there are missing headers so

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

Hi, > But if you are going to do something, it should be what is recommended I am doing what is recommend by policy and consensus on legal discuss. > Did you contact the upstreams? As I have stated I will yes and I will be doing that with my Flex PMC hat on. Thanks, Justin

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

On 10/3/16, 3:02 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> There are lots of non-ideal things in software that we don't have to >>invest time on. > >If you just let me JFDI the only investment would be my time and this >would of be sorted by now. But if you are going to

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

Hi, > There are lots of non-ideal things in software that we don't have to invest > time on. If you just let me JFDI the only investment would be my time and this would of be sorted by now. > If the upstreams do not respond then we can > consider what to do in our repo next. This is

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

On 10/3/16, 2:28 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Again, to be clear, no commits to our repo, just a PR or patch to the >> OpenFL community? > >There will be commits to our repo. > >> Roy said that there is no obligation. > >He also said this isn't an ideal way

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

Hi, > Again, to be clear, no commits to our repo, just a PR or patch to the > OpenFL community? There will be commits to our repo. > Roy said that there is no obligation. He also said this isn't an ideal way to operate in the same email [1] He also stated adding an Apache header to a 3rd

Re: AW: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

On 10/3/16, 9:56 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Please ... what is the problem here? I really don't get it. > > >Justin found stuff that we could live with and have a slight risk or we >change things and don't have that slight risk. Now you might think that >it's not

AW: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

he.org Betreff: Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues On 10/2/16, 10:03 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >> Assuming "Fix header" means "notify upstream" and work with the third >> party project until they are sa

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

ss files, and again, we did not start by copying their files. > >> I assume you are planning to contact design modo as well? > >Yes as I stated in my email. see a few lines below which you also >included in your reply. > >>> I’ll also ask upstream to fix any

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

ew lines below which you also included in your reply. >> I’ll also ask upstream to fix any issues i.e. missing headers for OpenFL >> and missing license and copyright clarification for FlatUI. Thanks, Justin

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

ual, not as a representative of the ASF or the Apache Flex PMC. >- Add header but not copyright for FlatUI (see discussion below) Add header to where? I assume you are planning to contact designmodo as well? -Alex > >I’ll also ask upstream to fix any issues i.e. missing header

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

for FlatUI (see discussion below) I’ll also ask upstream to fix any issues i.e. missing headers for OpenFL and missing license and copyright clarification for FlatUI. For FlatUI there are 14 contributors to the repo [2] one main one (who looks to be no longer involved) and 3 other significant ones

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

Hi, As you’ve raised it on legal discuss I wait until the discussion has finished there before making any changes. Thanks, Justin

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

files are handled is ASF policy and 3rd parties don’t need to >follow that. That's not to do with complying with the terms of a 3rd >party license which applies to everyone (including us). I will ask on legal discuss whether he was addressing this particular scenario or any third-party with do

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

been on occasion to add a header but the answer may be it depends.The MadLib project has a similar issue (on a larger scale), advice was not to add headers, which is causing all sort of issues and is still open and needs to be sorted before graduation. Roy did state in that thread about that that

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

IMO, there are 3 categories of inclusion: 1) Bundling an entire release artifact. 2) Bundling an entire file from a release artifact where the top-level license applies to that file. 2a) and then modifying that file 3) Copying portions of an existing work into an ASF-owned fie. Then there is a

Re: AW: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

On 9/20/16, 3:34 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >I'm no lawyer, but even if you only copy+paste an If statement that's >actually a derivate work ... at least that's the way I understood it ... >please correct me if I'm wrong. > I am not a lawyer either, but my

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

che.org > Betreff: Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues > > For that matter, we did not even consume entire functions. The only thing I > took from there was the algorithms of some of the methods. > > On Sep 20, 2016, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >

AW: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

10:18:34 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues For that matter, we did not even consume entire functions. The only thing I took from there was the algorithms of some of the methods. On Sep 20, 2016, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: &

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

Hi, > For that matter, we did not even consume entire functions. The only thing I > took from there was the algorithms of some of the methods. Which is enough, converting an algorithm from one language to another doesn’t change the original copyright. Just reading someones other source code

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

For that matter, we did not even consume entire functions. The only thing I took from there was the algorithms of some of the methods. On Sep 20, 2016, at 9:48 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > AIUI, parts of OpenFL code was used for portions of Matrix.as. We are not > consuming their

Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues

Hi, > Are you proposing to get the OpenFL community to accept headers on their > source > files by submitting a pull request on their repos and then replicating > that header under the ASF header in Matrix.as? No I was going to add a header to make it clear that the code wasn’t originally

Current FlexJS license/notice issues

Hi, As requested here’s an email with current outstanding issues. They are mentioned in the vote emails [1][2] but also previously in [3] and [4] and (the header issue) during the 0.6 release. - Missing text of MIT license for OpenFL. Fix add header to OpenFL and add pointer to license text

Re: AW: FlexJS 0.7.0 - NPM installation issues

en point of view. > > >Chris > > >Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> >Gesendet: Montag, 22. August 2016 22:15:35 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betreff: Re: FlexJS 0.7.0 - NPM installation issues > >Chris, I'm guessing you don't need to do anything because

AW: FlexJS 0.7.0 - NPM installation issues

Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Montag, 22. August 2016 22:15:35 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: FlexJS 0.7.0 - NPM installation issues Chris, I'm guessing you don't need to do anything because I think you and Alex were working to

Re: FlexJS 0.7.0 - NPM installation issues

t; > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> > Gesendet: Montag, 22. August 2016 17:09:03 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: FlexJS 0.7.0 - NPM installation issues > > One more thing that will be easy to miss: > > The execu

AW: FlexJS 0.7.0 - NPM installation issues

Will this have an effect on the Maven Plugin? Chris Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Montag, 22. August 2016 17:09:03 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: FlexJS 0.7.0 - NPM installation issues One more thing that will be easy t

Re: FlexJS 0.7.0 - NPM installation issues

One more thing that will be easy to miss: The executable files like asjsc in js/bin have been tweaked a bit to include different default compiler arguments. The NPM exectuables like asjscnpm will need those same tweaks. - Josh On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala

Re: FlexJS 0.7.0 - NPM installation issues

On 8/20/16, 11:08 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >On Aug 20, 2016 10:33 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >> >> >> >> On 8/20/16, 5:50 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash >>Muppirala" >>

Re: FlexJS 0.7.0 - NPM installation issues

On Aug 20, 2016 10:33 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > On 8/20/16, 5:50 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" > wrote: > > >Okay, looks like the falcon distribution has changed a lot. Can you > >please >

Re: FlexJS 0.7.0 - NPM installation issues

On 8/20/16, 5:50 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >Okay, looks like the falcon distribution has changed a lot. Can you >please >point me to the new way of doing these: > >Right now, we copy: > >falcon/js/lib

Re: FlexJS 0.7.0 - NPM installation issues

Okay, looks like the falcon distribution has changed a lot. Can you please point me to the new way of doing these: Right now, we copy: falcon/js/lib to flexjs/js/lib falcon/js/lib to flexjs/js/libs falcon/externs to flexjs/externs falcon/compiler/generated/dist/sdk/lib to flexjs/lib

Re: FlexJS 0.7.0 - NPM installation issues

On 8/19/16, 3:44 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: > >In 0.6.0, we were copying files from the >'...\downloads\falcon\compiler\generated\dist\sdk\bin' directory. Did >that >get moved? Yes. The Maven refactor

FlexJS 0.7.0 - NPM installation issues

I just tried the rc release with the current npm installation setup. First issue I see is this: Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, scandir 'C:\Users\omuppirala\AppData\Roaming\npm\node_modules\flexjs\downloads\falcon\compiler\generated\dist\sdk\bin' In 0.6.0, we were copying files from

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

I was able to build without turning off RAT. Last night I think I fixed the last issue in the RAT scan on the source package. You can't run RAT on the repo yet. -Alex On 8/15/16, 10:28 AM, "piotrz" wrote: >I've also build with skipped RAT falcon and flexjs using

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

I've also build with skipped RAT falcon and flexjs using maven without the problem. - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Just-got-my-first-FlexJS-talk-accepted-tp54302p54502.html Sent from the

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

OK, Does anybody else have any issues? I've unpacked the Ant-generated packages for flex-falcon and flex-asjs and run Maven and the maven build completes successfully on my Mac. If no other issues, we could start a vote mid-week. -Alex On 8/14/16, 12:41 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

Thanks for the links. Openfl had the simplest implementation. There’s only so many ways you can write the solution to the same math problem… ;-) For the most part, I used the logic in that code, but I did not use it exactly. I just committed my changes. I improved the Matrix class to make the

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

Hi, > I’m rewriting the functions in Matrix (and removing Vector3D as we’re not > actually using it). If the original is GPL licensed then this may not be enough [1][2][3][4] Justin 1. https://s.apache.org/rewriting-code 2.

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

Hi, > I’m rewriting the functions in Matrix (and removing Vector3D as we’re not > actually using it). Why rewrite when you could just use an Apache license compatible version? i.e. from a recent version of Shumway (rather than the older GPL/MPL version). [1] It's currently TypeScript but

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

I’m rewriting the functions in Matrix (and removing Vector3D as we’re not actually using it). I should be able to commit my changes on Monday. On Aug 12, 2016, at 10:19 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: >> 8) Matrix.as and Vector3D.as

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

Uber question: are we voting on the packages generated by the Ant script, or did Chris finish the packaging via Maven? My answers below are about the Ant script. On 8/12/16, 12:19 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> 1) Is there CreateJS-licensed source in the source

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

Hi, > 1) Is there CreateJS-licensed source in the source package? EaselJS and TweenJS are part of the CreateJS project so that’s probably a yes. Either way there's no harm in mentioning it. > 3) License for svg.js. This file comes from > https://code.google.com/archive/p/closureidl/ where

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

I've made some updates to the falconjx release packages. A reminder: only the flex-asjs and falconjx packages are up for release. The falcon-only packages are not. Culling and consolidating from the links, I think the list of issues is: 1) Is there CreateJS-licensed source in the source

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

Hi, > I did not end up using that code. I used code from the Closure library which > is Apache 2 licensed. Which we were already using right. If so nothing more would need to be added to LICENSE or NOTICE (as it’s already there) so that’s one off the list. Thanks, Justin

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

I did not end up using that code. I used code from the Closure library which is Apache 2 licensed. On Aug 3, 2016, at 1:50 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > or encode/decode UTF8

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

On 8/2/16, 4:37 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >What is a good location for testing out the 0.7 binary? I want to test >out >the npm installer. Nightly build?

Re: Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

What is a good location for testing out the 0.7 binary? I want to test out the npm installer. Thanks, Om On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > > There's a couple of licensing/policy issues outstanding AFAIK [1][2][3], >

Outstanding issues for 0.7 release

Hi, There's a couple of licensing/policy issues outstanding AFAIK [1][2][3], also Im not sure if the issues with FlatUI [3] or encode/decode UTF8 [4] have been resolved or the possible GPL/MPL licensing issue [6] Is there anything else I’ve missed? Thanks, Justin 1.https://lists.apache.org

Re: Issues as Flex Interaction Designer using Adobe CS5.5 tools on OSX (v10.9 - v10.11) looking for a solution

Hi Sebastian, I know a person using CS 5.5 without problem (installing the : Java for OS X 2015-001 comented in one of the threads That person is using El Capitan, so I think the software is working, although maybe with bugs that could arise from

Re: [JIRA] unable to create new JIRA issues

e arrow >> button on the right half of the drop down , it seems to restrict your >> choices to Service Desk issues. If you actually click on the word >> "Create" on the left half of the drop down, it allows me to create new >> Flex issues. >> >> Let me know if that doesn't work and we'll dig deeper. >> >> -Alex

Re: [JIRA] unable to create new JIRA issues

When I log in, there is a Create drop down. If you click on the arrow button on the right half of the drop down , it seems to restrict your choices to Service Desk issues. If you actually click on the word "Create" on the left half of the drop down, it allows me to create new Flex is

Re: [JIRA] unable to create new JIRA issues

on the right half of the drop down , it seems to restrict your > choices to Service Desk issues. If you actually click on the word > "Create" on the left half of the drop down, it allows me to create new > Flex issues. > > Let me know if that doesn't work and we'll dig d

Re: [JIRA] unable to create new JIRA issues

anks, > Om > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Marcus Fritze <marcus.fri...@googlemail.com >> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I can not create new jira issues for Flex SDK project. When I log in, I >> can only create new service desk issues for Kylin, Atlas

[JIRA] unable to create new JIRA issues

Hi, I can not create new jira issues for Flex SDK project. When I log in, I can only create new service desk issues for Kylin, Atlas, Apache Infrastructure and Eagle. Maybe, something crashed, when they updated the JIRA. How can I create a new issue? My ijra username is marcusfritze Thanks

Re: [JIRA] unable to create new JIRA issues

I just tried, seems to be working fine for me. (Chrome on Windows) What url are using? Thanks, Om On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Marcus Fritze <marcus.fri...@googlemail.com > wrote: > Hi, > > I can not create new jira issues for Flex SDK project. When I log in, I > c

Re: Scripts issues on 4.14.1

Hi there Alex Thanks for the feedback. Yep I was trying to install, but turns out was internet connection problem over VPN, when I turned off VPN, worked like a charm. The installer was redirecting me to 404 mirrors randomly. Problem solved on my side, others with same issue over Ubuntu ? I

Scripts issues on 4.14.1

I'm trying to compile the version mentioned on subject but I got this error BUILD FAILED /home/igorcosta/dev/flex-sdks/apache-flex4.14.1/installer.xml:726: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/igorcosta/dev/flex-sdks/apache-flex4.14.1//installer.xml:873: The following

Re: [FalconJX] AS for Native HTML JS (was Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JIRA issues and helping with the compiler)

this is where we’d have to prove there are no hard-coded dependencies in Falcon/FalconJX on playerglobal/airglobal. See the above links and give feedback on what you think. OK, one more thought: there may be reverse-engineering issues about

Re: [FalconJX] AS for Native HTML JS (was Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JIRA issues and helping with the compiler)

TypeScript's output had unexpected issues. - Josh On May 28, 2015 7:47 AM, Michael Schmalle teotigraphix...@gmail.com wrote: Well see Josh, I am good at writing cross compilers but have spent hardly any time understanding all the nuances of javascript. Each time I have written this thing, I have had

Re: [FalconJX] AS for Native HTML JS (was Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JIRA issues and helping with the compiler)

. See the above links and give feedback on what you think. OK, one more thought: there may be reverse-engineering issues about replacing playerglobal/airglobal, but I was hoping we might find some Tamarin code laying around that has what

Re: [FalconJX] AS for Native HTML JS (was Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JIRA issues and helping with the compiler)

knowledge of Babel would be good to have around to sanity check things in case TypeScript's output had unexpected issues. Yeah one of them that I wouldn't have caught early on would be accessors support. Well for now, I will match TypeScripts output and we can use Bable's way of calling super

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JIRA issues and helping with the compiler

since your are basically the main committer on the compiler right now, that you just fix stuff and don't enter issues. Yep. Although if more folks are going to work on stuff I’ll be more motivated to file tickets. That said, is there anything that you know about with the compiler

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JIRA issues and helping with the compiler

teotigraphix...@gmail.com wrote: In the FlexJS and FalconJX categories there is not much and just assuming since your are basically the main committer on the compiler right now, that you just fix stuff and don't enter issues. Yep. Although if more folks are going

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JIRA issues and helping with the compiler

, Michael Schmalle teotigraphix...@gmail.com wrote: In the FlexJS and FalconJX categories there is not much and just assuming since your are basically the main committer on the compiler right now, that you just fix stuff and don't enter issues. Yep. Although

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JIRA issues and helping with the compiler

, that you just fix stuff and don't enter issues. Yep. Although if more folks are going to work on stuff I’ll be more motivated to file tickets. That said, is there anything that you know about with the compiler FalconJX/FlexJS that I could work

Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JIRA issues and helping with the compiler

. The things missing are RadialGradients and some filters like DropShadow and Glow. I don't think it would be too hard to add this. There might be more issues, but I guess they will become more obvious as we start building this out. But, this looks like a very good usecase for skinnable

[FalconJX] AS for Native HTML JS (was Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JIRA issues and helping with the compiler)

be reverse-engineering issues about replacing playerglobal/airglobal, but I was hoping we might find some Tamarin code laying around that has what we’d start with for jsglobal.swc. -Alex

<    1   2   3   4   5   >