member I don’t have a strong vote, but, my observation is that
most of the community has moved on and there is little activity. If those that
are still active want to keep going then God’s speed.
Matt Hogstrom
m...@hogstrom.org
+1-919-656-0564
PGP Key: 0x90ECB270
Facebook <http://www.facebook.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Hogstrom reassigned GERONIMO-5309:
---
Assignee: Matt Hogstrom
Invalid signature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12869682#action_12869682
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-5309:
-
Here are the list of artifacts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12680291#action_12680291
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-4558:
-
David,
Is this the error you refer
+1
On May 23, 2008, at 2:20 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Hi,
JAX-WS 2.1 spec jar is used by Axis2 and CXF projects and it will help
Geronimo in transition to JAX-WS 2.1. This is a very first release of
the JAX-WS 2.1 spec jar.
This version contains fixes for the problems Kevan found (missing
Its long overdue and I'm moving my creaky bones to release this guy.
Since its more of a sample / application I wanted to solicit some
input on the criteria for a release.
I was planning on including a bundle that had the source, an ear as
well as a deployment plan for the derby database.
On May 16, 2008, at 2:34 PM, David Blevins wrote:
I'm fine opening it up to anyone.
+1
On May 14, 2008, at 10:32 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On May 14, 2008, at 2:35 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On May 13, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
What happened to the AMD systems which were heating up my
apartment last year? 2 4x (dual core) 16g machines with nice RAID
cards, etc... ?
Well, you can't donate to 'Geronimo' per se only to the ASF. I
wasn't involved directly in this, but I believe the heritage for the
machines is AMD - IBM. IBM people used the machines for their
geronimo work (including GBuild).
I worked with AMD to acquire these systems. When we got
I did a quick search on the web for what it would take to build two
systems. Here is the initial SWAG.
SuperMicro CSE-825S2-R700LPV U2 Rackmountable eATX Case (700W PSU,
Silver) $750 x 2 = $1500
Sony DRU190A 20X DVD Rewritable Drive - 20x DVD±R $40
x 2 =80
+1
On Apr 24, 2008, at 7:41 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
I've prepared a second release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.1
for your review and vote.
The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.1 release currently resides
here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.1
Are we breaking new ground here? I'd suspect that the other projects
that are using the Wiki may have already discussed this and may have a
resolution.
Thanks to Miller, Miller and Miller for their awareness of the legal
ramifications; I missed it and its a good point.
On Apr 16, 2008,
Hi Vasiliy,
I'll take a look at this one and the other issue you noted in OpenEJB
in another e-mail.First step is I'll grab your updated DDs. Just
out of curiosity, are you deploying this to Oracle?
On Feb 29, 2008, at 12:21 PM, Vasily Zakharov wrote:
Hi, Matt, all,
The third
Very nice. Looks like an excellent environment. But where oh where
are the AMD servers? :)
On Mar 1, 2008, at 6:54 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
http://flickr.com/photos/jasondillon/sets/72157604001910491/
:-P
--jason
I do not believe there are any incompatibilities for Derby.
On Feb 21, 2008, at 12:42 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Vasily Zakharov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In G2.0.2 tranql-connector-derby-embed-xa was version 1.4, and in
G2.1
it's version 1.3, is it ok?
/matt grumbles about Joe burning up the electricity in his basement
Joe, you've gone above and beyond. thanks
On Feb 21, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Most definitely. Thank you Joe for shouldering such a big
responsibility for the project.
Cheers
Prasad
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at
+1
I tested the Tomcat JEE version and was able to deploy DayTrader 2.0
and run through all scenarios.
pgp signatures verified ok
gpg: Signature made Sun Feb 10 15:21:19 2008 EST using DSA key ID
86859358
gpg: Good signature from Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Other items in NOTICES and
On Feb 8, 2008, at 11:56 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
To foster more projects to test and support Geronimo, I'd like to
float the idea of creating a new page under the Community navigation
section on our home page called -
Ready for Geronimo
Thoughts?
I always have a hard time with
double ditto :)
On Feb 5, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
I think the Geronimo G graphics merit the continued gratitude of
the Geronimo project. I'd like to see our little thank you restored.
Would you be ok with that? How do others feel?
--kevan
Keep 'em around, we can always whack them later.
On Jan 17, 2008, at 1:51 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I was wondering if we prematurely deleted tools. It would be nice
to have our own IDL compiler. I was thinking that we could move
tools to a dir in the sandbox for someone to pick up.
Recently I have had several things change personally and I have found
it increasingly difficult to keep up with the Geronimo mailing lists
on a daily basis. As a result, I did some soul searching and decided
that my intentions to stay on top of Geronimo were good but my follow
through
Please accept this report from the Geronimo PMC for January 2008.
Apache Geronimo Board Report
The Apache Geronimo Project has released Geronimo 2.0.2 in October.
Currently we are working on the 2.1 release for January 2008 (or so).
Geronimo voted to accept project Yoko as a sub-project in
+1
On Jan 10, 2008, at 5:35 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Discuss thread (for reference):
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200711.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Changes since last release:
r585608 | dain
Just a few short days left. Please take a few minutes and update the
Wiki. I'll take what we have on Monday at 0800 ET and submit it for
our report for January.
On Dec 31, 2007, at 8:45 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Its that time again. I have created the template and would ask
everyone
If it is better and easier than http-client are they interested in
it? Seems like a logical fit. That said, I think Genender boy wanted
to melt some metal when he started this work. If it remains without a
home I'd put it in components and let folks pick it up if they are
interested.
Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Jeff started working on some of it over at MINA btw.
Excuse the
cross post.
Alex
On Jan 9, 2008 4:10 PM, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is better and easier than http-client are they interested in
it? Seems like a logical fit. That said
I was recently talking to a user that was really interested in the
modular framework of the server. They really liked the idea of
jettisoning the EJB container and were also really interested in
monitoring the server. For those folks I'd suspect that JMX is the
right answer. Personally,
I came into my office today to go through the accumulation of stuff
from this year and prepare for next year. I guess it is inevitable
but one generally tends to be a bit contemplative around this time of
year. Thinking about accomplishments, missed opportunities and the
goals for next
Its that time again. I have created the template and would ask
everyone to take a few minutes to post their updates / input.
The report is due on the 16th. I'll send a reminder and close the
report out on the 13th for submission to the board so we'll be on time.
I started to take a performance look at the difference between 2.0.2
and 2.1. Here is a sniff at the startup time differences. There is a
slight degredation of about 1/2 a second in OpenEJB but that appears
to be related to some additional logging. Perhaps this can be
disabled before we
Wszystkiego najlepszego w nowym roku
back at ya bubba :)
On Dec 28, 2007, at 3:37 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
Hi Geronimos,
I'm leaving for a couple of days skiing in the Polish mountains and
I'll be offline till 01/03. Just though I'd wish you Happy New Year
2008 and better Geronimo-OpenEJB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12554318
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-3718:
-
I'll give it a spin.
ResourceRef lookups are now really
I had this problem and re-built oejb and its fine now. I was't able
to deploy the new version as I'm travelling. Hope this helps.
Matt Hogstrom
(919)656-0564
On Dec 20, 2007, at 14:57, Erik B. Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Has anyone else been experiencing problems building since
If GShell would be targeted at more servers than G then I think these
commands should be under geronimo. If not, then I think a flat
structure makes sense.
On Dec 11, 2007, at 10:04 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
We currently have the following structure for Geronimo GShell
commands:
+1
On Dec 11, 2007, at 4:58 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Folks, a small change to Genesis was made to support a custom legal
resource bundle for the GShell release. I'd like to get this out so
we can get GShell out too.
+1 -Release it
+0 -Eh, whatever
-1 -Um, no no no no no...
+1
On Dec 7, 2007, at 7:01 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
[ ] +1 - Release the jars
[ ] 0 - No opinion
[ ] -1 - Do not release the jars
We're voting on the following which are required for the Geronimo
2.1 release:
1) Release 1.0.0 of the activation 1.1 spec API. The artifact in
question is
On Dec 10, 2007, at 8:25 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
I see Monitoring Console as a tool, a standard J2EE Application,
that has been packaged for a convenient installation in Geronimo. It
talks to a geronimo specific agent to discover and monitor a geronimo
instance running elsewhere. I
On Dec 5, 2007, at 4:29 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On Dec 4, 2007 11:23 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It is not clear to me if this is part of the earlier code or a
separate program. If it is part of the JMX code, then Runtime is from
the local jvm not remote. The
On Dec 6, 2007, at 12:45 PM, Viet Nguyen wrote:
There are goods and bads to both sides to this. If we strictly follow
JSR 77, which means we will use MEJB and are forced to have OpenEJB as
a pre-req, we won't have to worry if our architecture is good or not
(I hope this is right), because
On Dec 7, 2007, at 6:46 AM, John Sisson wrote:
IMHO, as much as I dislike saying this.. IE support should be
mandatory considering the number of users who use it. The
disadvantages of Dojo 1.0.1 sound pretty minor compared the other
options not supporting browsers.
I think browser
On Dec 7, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
2. If yes, then where should we move it to? Should it be in server/
trunk/plugins or should the monitoring plugin be a subproject.
I was thinking of plugins..
I'm not sure it really matters where the code goes in the interim.
+1
On Dec 6, 2007, at 9:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
The discussion thread has been out there long enough for comment,
and those who have responded appear positive about the prospect. I
think it's time to put this to a vote. The full proposal from Matt
Hogstrom is attached at the end
The members of project yoko have been considering the future of Yoko
as a project. There have been several milestones delivered and the
project is used by other ASF projects. The project is not as active
as other ASF projects and it makes sense to move the code from Yoko to
other
Let the release begin.
If your looking for someone to goat herd it I can help you with that .
On Nov 27, 2007, at 3:52 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Upcoming OpenEJB and Geronimo releases are going to require the
release of geronimo-txmanager 2.1 (i.e. geronimo-transaction and
Please extend a welcome to Erik Craig who is the latest committer to
be added to the Geronimo fold. Erik has had a sustained and continued
track record in working on the J2G conversion tool as well as his
recent work on monitoring with Anita. and others.
Give it up for Mr Craig !
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 8:48 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving to TranQL 1.4 ?
Excellent ... I'm finishing some other performance work. When I get
that completed I'd like to get this tested
no, I'll try again.
On Nov 2, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Just curious - Any news on this?
Jay
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I sent him a private ping as well just as a heads up.
On Oct 27, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Oct 27, 2007, at 5:13 AM, Kevan Miller wrote
I sent him a private ping as well just as a heads up.
On Oct 27, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Oct 27, 2007, at 5:13 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct 26, 2007, at 11:57 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I think that Geir has to ACK that the paperwork was completed.
Has he done
+1 Jason's +1
On Oct 28, 2007, at 6:21 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I'm obviously +1 for a sub-project ;-)
--jason
On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct 26, 2007, at 10:35 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I don't see why we shouldn't. But can someone more informed please
list
Looks like we missed 2.0.2 :-(
How do folks feel about delivering this in 2.1?
On Aug 21, 2007, at 6:05 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Oh man this is sweet...
I'd *really* like to see this in 2.0.2...
Sorry for the cross post bubba ... feeble minds and all that
My +1
On Oct 25, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Title says it all...I'd really like to see gshell as the default
execution for Geronimo 2.1. Any objectsions? Jason, is this
something
you can get going?
Jeff
for the kudos in the acknowledgements
Heh, thank you
- yes, we need to tag 1.2 and 2.0 so we can start the next turn of
the crank on 2.X
I'll start that process this week. Need to get the web pages updated
a bit as well. Lots of little stuff to do.
chris
On 10/22/07, Matt Hogstrom
with individual
run results like last time?
Maybe...I have the XML files from JIBE but there doesn't seem to be a
way to regerenate a nice summary...do you know how to do this ?
HTH,
Piyush Agarwal
On 10/22/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been noodling on this for a bit and wanted
from the XML... seems it does summarize
the run at the end of then file under the HTTP_summary tag.
On 10/23/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:53 AM, Piyush Agarwal wrote:
Hi Matt,
This is a great report .. thanks for taking the time to create it.
Here is my
As for JIBE, If you have the .log files which go with the xml files
its easy as they have the complete JIBE output captured verbatim
which you can copy paste in the report. I dont know any automated
way of getting the numbers from the XML... seems it does summarize
the run at the end
I've been noodling on this for a bit and wanted to give y'all a
gander at what I have for the performance report at this point. This
is based on 2.0.2 and uses DayTrader 2.0. There are a few numbers
that are missing. I originally had planned on not producing them but
the charts look odd
Congrats bubba ... we've come a long way baby.
On Oct 19, 2007, at 11:30 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
Wanted to let everyone know that the Geronimo 2.0.2 binaries are
available for download -- http://geronimo.apache.org/downloads.html
2.0.2 addresses a number of issues that were found in
Tony,
OpenEJB uses svn for a private repo to stabilize their release. The
jars you are looking for are located at http://svn.apache.org/repos/
asf/openejb/repo/org/apache/xbean/xbean-naming/
Adding the following repo should fix the problem
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/repo/
On
Disabling AJP by default makes a lot of sense. Users that are
interested will seek it out.
I think 25 threads per core as a default makes sense as a good
starting point. Assuming most people would run a 4-way for
production a default in the thread pool like 100 is a good
starting
Joe,
On nique you can use the IBM JDK to get a heap dump. Although, the
question I have is does your system hang in terms of 0% CPU or some %
CPU? If your CPU is at 0 its probably another problem not related to
heap. The thread dump is a good idea.
On Oct 16, 2007, at 10:37 AM, Joe
Forgot to copy the dev and PMC lists.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: October 16, 2007 1:36:52 PM EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Geronimo Status Report for October - 2007
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Included is the Geronimo Board report for October
I have run performance benchmarks on this release using DayTrader.
Thanks for goat herding the release Kevan :)
Here is my +1
On Oct 12, 2007, at 9:57 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I've prepared a 2.0.2 release candidate for review and vote.
+1
I think we should keep the KEYS file in trunk and copy it to dist
when we're releasing...
On Oct 12, 2007, at 12:07 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Aug 8, 2007, at 3:08 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
And... this is done. I don't know what else needs to be
changed... if anyone runs into any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12533925
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-3520:
-
Viet, for the txmanager patch I think there may be an issue
/DAYTRADER-57
Project: DayTrader
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.0
Environment: All
Reporter: Matt Hogstrom
Priority: Trivial
Fix For: 2.0
Currently DayTrader defaults to a maximum number of users of 200 and maximum
I think Kevan was going to do this yesterday but in his sleep
deprived state from Globe trotting he may still be snoozing. I'll
let him whack me on the head if my notice is inconsistent with his
desire as release manager.
We'll create the 2.0.2 branch on Saturday, October 5th around 1000
We currently have the following SNAPSHOTs for the TranQL vendor RARs
in branches/2.0
tranql-connector-mysql-local1.1-SNAPSHOT
tranql-connector-mysql-xa 1.1-SNAPSHOT
tranql-connector-postgresql-local 1.1-SNAPSHOT
tranql-connector-postgresql-xa 1.1-SNAPSHOT
Vasily,
We've moved from TranQL for the support of CMP to OpenJPA. Dain
provided a neat bridge so we can use the same technology for EJB 3
and EJB 2.x. At this point you can achieve the desired results using
the orm.xml and OpenJPA configuration. I'd be interested in helping
you out
. Please also
note issues OPENEJB-700 and OPENEJB-701 filed while trying to make the
things above work, adjustments were made to workaround OPENEJB-701.
Thanks alot for your help!
Vasily
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:56
So to cl;arify I think DayTrader may be mis-characterized as only a
benchmark. I think it is used for a variety of functions of which
only one aspect is performance. the other aspects are testing
infrastructure, sample application (which includes deployments plans
for various pieces of
relevance if it isn't updated
to reflect how people are using the technology.
On 10/3/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So to cl;arify I think DayTrader may be mis-characterized as only a
benchmark. I think it is used for a variety of functions of which
only one aspect
Gianny, this looks pretty good. So for users that have large session
objects this looks like a way to effectively manage them.
Is your question about the license used for AspectJ from the Eclipse
Foundation ?
On Sep 28, 2007, at 9:23 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add a
On Oct 1, 2007, at 11:23 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
Matt...
In summary, I guess I really just wanted to say that I feel the web
services modes in DayTrader should be removed at least until we can
come up with something better. If the only reason to keep these
around is to provide a
It would be a powered by version if the name is used. AFAICT there
is no restriction to take the code and call it Chris' Benchmark. I
spect there are others out there with more insight on how some of
this work. Bill Stoddard would know since Apache get's rebranded by
several folks.
I'm going to port the market summary interval changes back from 2.0
to 1.2 so we can get comparable numbers between the versions. With
that I'd like to sugggest we wrap up 1.2 and 2.0 and release these.
Are there any outstanding changes folks want before we let these
releases out?
I'll be the dissenting opinion :)
Personally, I don't like INFO as its too verbose and it is not
consistent across projects. If we moved it I would prefer WARN rather
than INFO but it largely depends on who we feel the largest user
population is.. I'm more concerned about people's
On Sep 14, 2007, at 2:55 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I think it's time to start rolling out a 2.0.2 release. There have
been a number of fixes in response to user issues, since 2.0.1.
Time, I think, to make these available in a release. We'd also be
able to make use of released versions
+1 to move it ... I agree with the other comments on lazy consensus.
On Sep 12, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Given all of the work and interest in the J2G tool, I would like to
move the current J2G files from sandbox/j2g to devtools/trunk/j2g,
so we can start working towards an
This is excellent...I'll give it a spin today .
On Sep 10, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
Recent work on GERONIMO-3413 provides a new admin console with two
main improvements:
- New system modules and 3rd party plugins can dynamically add and
remove their portlets in the admin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12526496
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-3465:
-
Donald, personally I don't like lots of gorp coming out so I
+1 to remove it.
On Sep 6, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Good point, we already tamed the beast. If nobody opposes I would
just remove the reference on the website and archive the report
card somewhere in the wiki.
Cheers!
Hernan
Jarek Gawor wrote:
Hernan,
The
I put together a set of RAs for Postgres databases. There is a local
and XA transaction variety. I haven't tested them yet but these
should work fine. If someone has time or a setup to give them a spin
that would be excellent.
You'll need this jar for PostgreSQL 8.2
Tim,
I tried to get the plugin running and ran into a problem. Actually,
two.
First, I was getting an error indicating that Dynamic Web Content of
2.4 was not valid for the server. I had restarted Eclipse and this
went away.
Second, I'm getting the following error when trying to
Thanks for the heads up. I had a problem earlier with a JBoss file
being processed and deleted all of these files in my local image and
totally forgot about it until now.
How about we release 1.2? Its probably about time.
On Aug 31, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
All...
I get the same error David after an SVN up and rebuild. I'm at 572428.
On Sep 3, 2007, at 7:48 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I'm not getting this error, can anyone else reproduce it? It does
appear to be related to my last commit...
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 3, 2007, at 3:14 PM, [EMAIL
Thanks for the CWiki ...
On Sep 3, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
FYI, I took a brief stab and making this into a wiki page here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Roadmap+for+2.1
I've only really included my thoughts and davids, so please update
this puppy...
I'm changing ISPs this weekend so e-mail may be spotty. Justa heads up.
On Sep 1, 2007, at 8:34 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I think it would be more appropriate to put the stuff about the
dojo organization in the description or in some additional optional
content-author type elements.
I think your probably right David. We are distributing our component
+1 ... Also, I think we'll be in better shape in the future but will
always have this issue. Unfortunately, everyone was working at
different paces to get to Java EE 5. Of course, the same problem
will resurface on Java EE 6 ;-P
On Aug 30, 2007, at 10:47 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
On Aug
I like that idea. Keep people safe but let them blaze on if they so
desire.
On Aug 28, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I guess we could also disable stop and undeploy for the system modules
and have an expert mode checkbox or something on the screen to
enable them again. That ought
One other thought...perhaps we could play an audio clip of a shotgun
or other firearm action being moved to suggest the consequences of
hitting enter :)
On Aug 28, 2007, at 12:02 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I guess we could also disable stop and undeploy for the system modules
and have an
Uncle
On Aug 27, 2007, at 9:10 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Oh, this is fun...
--jason
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon)
Date: August 27, 2007 6:06:52 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/jdillon/ws/site/bin/sync
chmod:
Erik, Jason and Viet. This is really good. Since we're making a
SNAPSHOT available is there some point where we should declare a 1.0 ?
On Aug 23, 2007, at 4:30 PM, Erik B. Craig wrote:
All,
After the recent round of changes and improvements around j2g
(usable from within the Eclipse
If someone is interested in running the TCK using Lassa, curare,
nique or wilbur let me know. I've shut them down since they weren't
being used. My electric bill topped over $300 last month. I'd hate
to have Al Gore get on my case for wasting energy and having to buy
more carbon
w00t ... thanks Chris.
On Aug 24, 2007, at 3:35 PM, Christopher Blythe wrote:
All,
I finally have all of the EJB 2.1 components pulled from trunk and
have converted DayTrader 2.0 over to be Java EE 5 only. I have
functionally tested as many of the operational modes and primitives
that
Done
On Aug 22, 2007, at 5:45 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Congratulations on the Geronimo 2.0.1 release. Are the released
artifacts availble in maven2 repo now?
Thanks,
Raymond
I put the 2.0.1 artifacts into the repo at Apache this morning and
they should be propagating if they haven't already. I was able to
build 2.0.1 after deleting my geronimo group in my local m2 repo.
Let me know if there are issues.
Does anyone know how to get an updated box for Geronimo that says
2.0.1? Since its the first thing people see on that page seems like
it would make more sense for the release number to be the most
recent. I'm happy to do it but not sure what software was used.
1 - 100 of 2122 matches
Mail list logo
