Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.28

Thank you, folks. I apologize again for the embarrassing mistake. Will be sending along the updated vote email in a few seconds. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2019-01-17 12:30, Yann Ylavic wrote: We should at the same 2.4.x state as before the release try now, I think the script(s) can be restarted

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.28

We should at the same 2.4.x state as before the release try now, I think the script(s) can be restarted with the correct tag/version (2.4.38! ;) ) as if it were the first time. On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 7:05 PM William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > An aside r.e. subversion; > > Just please d

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.28

An aside r.e. subversion; Just please don't do what gstein has warned us against. I've performed the ill-advised jump-over abandoned work in the past; svn rm ^/httpd/mod_foo/trunk svn cp ^/httpd/mod_foo/trunk@123456 ^/httpd/mod_foo/trunk attempting to drop activity between 123457 and

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.28

On 1/17/19 6:59 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Ahhh good. On Jan 17, 2019, at 12:46 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 6:44 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: Note that simply changing the commit msg logs does not solve the problem. There is, in fact, no 2.4.38 tag at all. And I'm guessing we

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.28

Ahhh good. > On Jan 17, 2019, at 12:46 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 6:44 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> Note that simply changing the commit msg logs does not solve the problem. >> There is, >> in fact, no 2.4.38 tag at all. And I'm guessing we destroyed the "real" >>

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.28

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:44 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > Note that simply changing the commit msg logs does not solve the problem. > There is, > in fact, no 2.4.38 tag at all. And I'm guessing we destroyed the "real" > 2.4.28 tag... :( Not destroyed, as ylavic observed. Nothing gets destroyed

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.28

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 6:44 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Note that simply changing the commit msg logs does not solve the problem. > There is, > in fact, no 2.4.38 tag at all. And I'm guessing we destroyed the "real" > 2.4.28 tag... :( Fortunately it just created tags/2.4.28/2.4.x since

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.28

Note that simply changing the commit msg logs does not solve the problem. There is, in fact, no 2.4.38 tag at all. And I'm guessing we destroyed the "real" 2.4.28 tag... :(

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.28

See no tarball at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ Also in SVN and Subject of theis mauk  I see 2.4.28 instead of 2.4.28 On 17-01-19 18:13, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.28

: Shouldn't this be 2.4.38?? On Jan 17, 2019, at 12:13 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.28

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.28

On 2019-01-17 11:24, Jim Jagielski wrote: Shouldn't this be 2.4.38?? On Jan 17, 2019, at 12:13 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.28

Shouldn't this be 2.4.38?? > On Jan 17, 2019, at 12:13 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, all; > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to r

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.28

Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.28: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk

Re: Testing regime during httpd development/release

branch. That means Commit Then Review. You push first, then anyone can make some review and/or comment on the code. If the code is considered good enough to be included in a new release, it has to be proposed for backport (see the STATUS file (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x

Re: Testing regime during httpd development/release

unchecked) devices? > > Is there a more suitable httpd mailing list for this question? Functional tests are in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/test/framework/trunk and are based on the Apache-Test framework. That's what most people are using to check a release and it's the best place to make sure

Re: Testing regime during httpd development/release

list to make successive httpd releases, but it's > not clear to me what goes into the QA for release engineering. > > I've been hacking some ideas locally into the Apache httpd source code > as part of a research project, and I usually test my changes by running > Apache Bench

Testing regime during httpd development/release

to me what goes into the QA for release engineering. I've been hacking some ideas locally into the Apache httpd source code as part of a research project, and I usually test my changes by running Apache Bench or other traffic generators on it. But I'm not sure how well this compares with what Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

On 2018-10-23 14:04, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 10/22/2018 04:08 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: On 2018-10-18 09:36, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

On 10/22/2018 04:08 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > On 2018-10-18 09:36, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Hi, all; >>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >> >> I would like to call a VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

Hi, Cory; Yes, you are correct. This gets cleaned up as part of the final fixups in the release scripts. It's one of the things done at the last moment :-) -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2018-10-22 10:23, Cory McIntire wrote: Just a note, the date here is Sept instead of Oct :) http

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

Just a note, the date here is Sept instead of Oct :) http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/Announcement2.4.html http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/Announcement2.4.txt (I realize this might not be final version of said text.. just wanted to mention) Thanks Cory McIntire Release Manager - EasyApache

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

On 2018-10-18 09:36, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.37: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

Hi Dennis, Am 22.10.2018 um 02:15 schrieb Dennis Clarke: On 10/21/2018 08:03 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 18.10.2018 um 16:36 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: Hi, all;     Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

On 10/21/2018 08:03 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 18.10.2018 um 16:36 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: Hi, all;     Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

Am 18.10.2018 um 16:36 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.37: [X] +1: It's not just good

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

+1 FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p4 amd64 openssl111-1.1.1_1 perl5-5.28.0 php72-7.2.11 Tested both prefork and event MPM -- Dennis

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 4:36 PM Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.37: +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! Tested on Debian(s) both with openssl-1.1.0 (system) and openssl-1.1.1 (compiled

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

Le 18/10/2018 à 16:36, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.37: [X] +1: It's not just good

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

+1 MacOS 10.14, OpenSSL 1.0.2p + 1.1.1, mod-h2 suite, mod-md suite Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, OpenSSL 1.1.0h, mod-h2 suite Thanks for RM'ing, Daniel! > Am 18.10.2018 um 16:36 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri : > > Hi, all; > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatu

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

On 10/19/2018 12:10 PM, Apache Lounge wrote: > > No issues seen/reported > > Httpd 36/37 introduced the following build warnings: > > modules\ssl\ssl_engine_init.c(926): warning C4003: not enough arguments for > function-like macro invocation 'APLOGNO' > >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

+1: o macOS 10.13.6, Xcode 10, OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2p o CentOS 5&6, OpenSSL 1.0.2, 64bit Thx for RMing! > On Oct 18, 2018, at 10:36 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, all; > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/r

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

e_t' to 'int', possible loss of data ..win64\httpd-2.4\modules\ssl\ssl_util_ssl.c(141): warning C4267: '=': conversion from 'size_t' to 'int', possible loss of data On Thursday 18/10/2018 at 16:36, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signa

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 09:36:41AM -0500, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate > tarba

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

nt to hear from you.  In fact, you are wrong, they are correct, go away : beta $ more README.TESTING [IMPORTANT NOTICE] --  Failed tests usually indicate a problem with your local system setup and not within PHP itself (at least for official PHP release versions). You

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

are wrong, they are correct, go away : beta $ more README.TESTING [IMPORTANT NOTICE] -- Failed tests usually indicate a problem with your local system setup and not within PHP itself (at least for official PHP release versions). You may decide to automatically submit a test summary to our Q

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

On 2018-10-18 09:36, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.37: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.37: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk

Re: t/modules/buffer.t failing in 2.4.36, LWP bug [Was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36]

On 10/14/2018 04:20 PM, Mark Blackman wrote: > > >> On 14 Oct 2018, at 12:33, Rainer Jung > > wrote: >> >> Am 13.10.2018 um 11:46 schrieb Rainer Jung: >>> Am 11.10.2018 um 20:55 schrieb Ruediger Pluem: On 10/11/2018 08:10 PM, Christophe JAILLET

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

> On Oct 15, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: > > > >> Am 15.10.2018 um 16:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski : >> >> It's up to the RM on whether or not to release... one can't veto a release >> and a -1 is not a veto. > > Huh? I was referri

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

Hi, all; As a result of testing and further analysis of this release, I am calling this release dead on the vine and shall not pursue publishing it. We have -1 votes based on the recently discovered OpenSSL 1.1.1 behavior change [1]. Although this tag shall not become a release, I'd like

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

On 10/15/2018 04:20 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: Am 15.10.2018 um 16:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski : It's up to the RM on whether or not to release... one can't veto a release and a -1 is not a veto. Huh? I was referring to "TLS 1.3 support isn't quite yet tested enough to warrant a p

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

> Am 15.10.2018 um 16:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski : > > It's up to the RM on whether or not to release... one can't veto a release > and a -1 is not a veto. Huh? I was referring to "TLS 1.3 support isn't quite yet tested enough to warrant a public release". I wanted to

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

It's up to the RM on whether or not to release... one can't veto a release and a -1 is not a veto. > On Oct 15, 2018, at 10:07 AM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: > > > >> Am 15.10.2018 um 15:58 schrieb Jim Jagielski : >> >> Considering all this, I am chan

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

> Am 15.10.2018 um 15:58 schrieb Jim Jagielski : > > Considering all this, I am changing my vote from a +1 to a -1. I was not able > to trigger this error, but this shows, at least IMO, that TLS 1.3 support > isn't quite yet tested enough to warrant a public release, unless

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

Considering all this, I am changing my vote from a +1 to a -1. I was not able to trigger this error, but this shows, at least IMO, that TLS 1.3 support isn't quite yet tested enough to warrant a public release, unless we are super clear that it is "experimental" or "early acces

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

tailed defect report. It would be interesting to trigger this > deliberately in the test framework. > > > On October 14, 2018 4:44:04 PM CDT, "Helmut K. C. Tessarek" > > wrote: > > On 2018-10-10 15:18, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, all; > >Please fin

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

On October 14, 2018 4:44:04 PM CDT, "Helmut K. C. Tessarek" < > tessa...@evermeet.cx> wrote: > > On 2018-10-10 15:18, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, all; > >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

th reported H2/TLS 1.3 > failures. Since this is one of the primary features of this release, I want > to be sure the topic gets due attention. See my mail on the other thread. It seems that h2 traffic triggers a call sequence that exposes a change in OpenSSL behaviour of SSL_read()

Re: t/modules/buffer.t failing in 2.4.36, LWP bug [Was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36]

Am 15.10.2018 um 02:37 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: On Sun, Oct 14, 2018, 18:47 Rainer Jung > wrote: On the contrary, the http2 tests (other thread) fail for me also with curl or browser, but only when the server is build with OpenSSL 1.1.1

Re: t/modules/buffer.t failing in 2.4.36, LWP bug [Was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36]

On Sun, Oct 14, 2018, 18:47 Rainer Jung wrote: > > On the contrary, the http2 tests (other thread) fail for me also with > curl or browser, but only when the server is build with OpenSSL 1.1.1 > (independent of TLS version used). > Goes without saying... But this browser and curl are both built

Re: t/modules/buffer.t failing in 2.4.36, LWP bug [Was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36]

Hi Daniel, Am 14.10.2018 um 23:30 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: On 2018/10/14 11:33:08, Rainer Jung wrote: > Am 13.10.2018 um 11:46 schrieb Rainer Jung:> > > Am 11.10.2018 um 20:55 schrieb Ruediger Pluem:> > >>> > >>> > >> On 10/11/2018 08:10 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:> > >>> No issue on

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

. Since this is one of the primary features of this release, I want to be sure the topic gets due attention. -- Daniel Ruggeri I was working on a "clean room" build and test but kept getting pulled aside into other peoples problems. I'll try to get moving. Dennis

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

of this release, I want to be sure the topic gets due attention. -- Daniel Ruggeri On October 14, 2018 4:44:04 PM CDT, "Helmut K. C. Tessarek" wrote: >On 2018-10-10 15:18, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Hi, all; >>    Please find below the proposed release tarball

Re: t/modules/buffer.t failing in 2.4.36, LWP bug [Was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36]

> On 14 Oct 2018, at 12:33, Rainer Jung wrote: > > Am 13.10.2018 um 11:46 schrieb Rainer Jung: >> Am 11.10.2018 um 20:55 schrieb Ruediger Pluem: >>> >>> >>> On 10/11/2018 08:10 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote: No issue on my Ubuntu 18.04 VM. On what configuration are you running

t/modules/buffer.t failing in 2.4.36, LWP bug [Was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36]

Am 13.10.2018 um 11:46 schrieb Rainer Jung: Am 11.10.2018 um 20:55 schrieb Ruediger Pluem: On 10/11/2018 08:10 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote: No issue on my Ubuntu 18.04 VM. On what configuration are you running your tests, Rüdiger? macOS, just like Jim? Centos 7.5 64 Bit Regards

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

+1 FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p4 security/openssl111 - 1.1.1_1 Hosting several live sites without errors or issues on this release candidate. TLSv1.3 successfully negotiated for capable browsers. Regards, Dennis

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

ger, Vodafone Group wrote: Do you know if the failure is a regression over 2.4.35? Regards Rüdiger Von: Marion et Christophe JAILLET Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 13:13 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: re: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 Waouh! This would mean I've p

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

Le 10/10/2018 à 21:18, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.36: [X] +1: It's not just good

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

ne Group >>> wrote: >>> >>> Do you know if the failure is a regression over 2.4.35? >>> Regards >>> Rüdiger >>> Von: Marion et Christophe JAILLET >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 13:13 >>> An: dev@httpd.apache.org &

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

On Oct 11, 2018, at 7:15 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote: Do you know if the failure is a regression over 2.4.35? Regards Rüdiger Von: Marion et Christophe JAILLET Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 13:13 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: re: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 02:18:45PM -0500, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate > tarba

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

ts > > >> On Oct 11, 2018, at 7:15 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group >> wrote: >> >> Do you know if the failure is a regression over 2.4.35? >> >> Regards >> >> Rüdiger >> >> Von: Marion et Christophe JAILLET >> Ge

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

> Rüdiger > > Von: Marion et Christophe JAILLET > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 13:13 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: re: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 > > Waouh! > > > > This would mean I've provided a new

re: AW: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

to a change of behavior in this area.   CJ   > Message du 11/10/18 13:15 > De : "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" > A : "dev@httpd.apache.org" > Copie à : > Objet : AW: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 > > Do you know if the failure is a regression over 2

AW: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

Do you know if the failure is a regression over 2.4.35? Regards Rüdiger Von: Marion et Christophe JAILLET Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 13:13 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: re: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 Waouh! This would mean I've provided a new useful test! (it has

re: AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

du 11/10/18 10:08 > De : "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" > A : "dev@httpd.apache.org" > Copie à : > Objet : AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 > > Anyone else seeing > > t/modules/buffer.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 12 Failed: 2) > Failed tests: 8, 12 > >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate > tarball as 2.4.36: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's

AW: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

uggeri > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 02:27 > An: dev@httpd.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36 > > +1 from me (talking to myself). > > Test environment follows. I observe only one failure of the test suite > (mentioned elsewhere) - it seems

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

+1 from me (talking to myself). Test environment follows. I observe only one failure of the test suite (mentioned elsewhere) - it seems only to apply w/ OpenSSL 1.1.1 and H2. system:   kernel:     name: Linux     release: 3.16.0-4-amd64     version: #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-3 (2017-12-13

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

+1: o macOS 10.13.6, Xcode 10, OpenSSL 1.1.1 o CentOS 5&6, OpenSSL 1.0.2, 64bit Will try to test against CentOS7 and Ubuntu 14.04LTS tomorrow Thx for RMing! > On Oct 10, 2018, at 3:18 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, all; > Please find below the proposed

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.36: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk

Re: svn commit: r29575 - /dev/httpd/ /release/httpd/

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:09 PM Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 09/21/2018 12:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > You may want to use this opportunity to drop md5 and sha1 hashes, you > > will be yelled at by ops when you attempt to publish new instances of > > these obsoleted hashes. > > > > Even on

Re: svn commit: r29575 - /dev/httpd/ /release/httpd/

On 09/21/2018 12:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: You may want to use this opportunity to drop md5 and sha1 hashes, you will be yelled at by ops when you attempt to publish new instances of these obsoleted hashes. In the apr release case, the announce was modded through anyways

Re: svn commit: r29575 - /dev/httpd/ /release/httpd/

hes, you > will be yelled at by ops when you attempt to publish new instances of > these obsoleted hashes.  > > In the apr release case, the announce was modded through anyways, but > a subsequent thread on dev@apr determined that only sha256 is both > useful and portable.

Re: svn commit: r29575 - /dev/httpd/ /release/httpd/

You may want to use this opportunity to drop md5 and sha1 hashes, you will be yelled at by ops when you attempt to publish new instances of these obsoleted hashes. In the apr release case, the announce was modded through anyways, but a subsequent thread on dev@apr determined that only sha256

Re: RESULT: Passed - [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

FYI, 2.4.35 version has been added to bz. CJ Le 21/09/2018 à 14:31, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : Hi, all;    I am delighted to share that the vote to release Apache httpd-2.4.35 has PASSED. The following votes were recorded: Binding +1: minfrin, icing, jorton, gsmith, steffenal, covener

RESULT: Passed - [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

Hi, all;    I am delighted to share that the vote to release Apache httpd-2.4.35 has PASSED. The following votes were recorded: Binding +1: minfrin, icing, jorton, gsmith, steffenal, covener, jailletc36, ylavic, rjung, druggeri, wroewe Community +1: Noel Butler I'd like to add that, as an RM

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

owing up on r1801144, use the new accept_filter_e enum > values in a couple of missed places in winnt_accept(). > > Submitted by: kotkov > Reviewed by: jailletc36, jim (via inspection), wrowe > > > > On 18-09-18 02:56, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Hi, all; >>     Please fin

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2:56, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.35: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

Am 21.09.2018 um 04:18 schrieb Dennis Clarke: +1 for release and thanks for RM. Not enough time right now for the usual detailed report, but so far looks good on Solaris 10 Sparc, SLES 11+12, RHEL 6+7. Thank you for getting to it before I did. I can ignore it now ;-) Not necessarily

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

+1 for release and thanks for RM. Not enough time right now for the usual detailed report, but so far looks good on Solaris 10 Sparc, SLES 11+12, RHEL 6+7. Thank you for getting to it before I did. I can ignore it now ;-) Dennis

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 7:57 PM Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball a

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

Am 18.09.2018 um 02:56 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.35: [X] +1: It's not just good

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

+1 with the following test suite: system: kernel: name: Linux release: 3.16.0-4-amd64 version: #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-3 (2017-12-13) machine: x86_64 libraries: openssl: "1.1.0i" openldap: "2.4.46" apr: "1.6.5" apr-util: "1

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 19:56:52 -0500 Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > Builds fine (once I'd found a keyserver that would talk to my gpg today), but the tests

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

Wow - that's actually really cool! Thanks for sharing - would love to see a HOWTO. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2018-09-19 14:59, Christophe JAILLET wrote: Le 18/09/2018 à 02:56, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

+1: It's not just good, it's good enough! Tested on Debian(s) 7/8/9/10, MPM event/worker/prefork, APR 1.6.5, OpenSSL 1.0.1 => 1.1.0. Thanks Daniel.

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

Le 18/09/2018 à 02:56, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.35: [X] +1: It's not just good

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 8:57 PM Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarbal

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

On 09/19/2018 01:18 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 9/17/2018 5:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all;     Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release ... Nothing seen

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

All fine here on Windows. > Op 18 sep. 2018 om 02:56 heeft Daniel Ruggeri het > volgende geschreven: > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOT

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

On 9/17/2018 5:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.35: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 07:56:52PM -0500, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

On 18/09/2018 10:56, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ all good on slackware 13.0+ with apr 1.6.5 and apr-util 1.6.1 -- Kind Regards, Noel Butler T

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

+1 h2 testsuite: - MacOS 10.13 - Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS (i386) - Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS (x86_64) md testsuite - MacOS 10.13 Looks good, thanks for RMing! -Stefan > Am 18.09.2018 um 02:56 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri : > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball an

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

n the 2.4.35 tag. > Where are you not seeing your changes? > > I checked > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.35/modules/http2/h2_session.c?view=markup > and the changes are there.. > >> -Stefan >>> Am 18.09.2018 um 02:56 schrieb Daniel Rugger

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

Daniel Ruggeri : Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.35: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

018 um 02:56 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri : > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.35: > [ ] +

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

On 18 Sep 2018, at 02:56, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.35: > [ ] +1:

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.35: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >