I'm looking to ANNOUNCE and RELEASE today, around noonish EDT...
Am 13.07.2018 um 15:03 schrieb Rainer Jung:
e I expect prefork on Solaris still to observe timeouts during
proxy tests like reported for previous versions, but didn't test
it this time due to the long test runs when the problem happens.
I started these runs right now just to be able to
The polls are closed and with more than the required 3 +1 (binding) votes and
no -1s, the VOTE passes!
Thx to all!
> On Jul 10, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.34 can be found at the usual place:
>
Am 10.07.2018 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
version 2.4.34 can be found at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.34 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger
Just a quick FYI that the vote closes in ~2hr from "now"... so get those tests
done and cast your vote!
TIA!
> On Jul 10, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.34 can be found at the usual
On 11/07/2018 00:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.34 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.34 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to g
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:03 AM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.34 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.34 GA.
&
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 11:42:49PM +0200, Christophe Jaillet wrote:
> I got once:
> t/modules/dav.t . 1/16 # Failed test 1 in
> t/modules/dav.t at line 47
> # Failed test 2 in t/modules/dav.t at line 52
> t/modules/dav.t . 3/16 # Failed test 9 in
>
Le 10/07/2018 à 16:03, Jim Jagielski a écrit :
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.34 can be found at the usual place:
>
>http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.34 GA.
>
> [X] +1: Goo
On 07/10/2018 10:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
version 2.4.34 can be found at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+1 on Solaris 10 Sparc with OpenSSL 1.1.0h
Apache/2.4.34 (Unix) OpenSSL/1.1.0h
Dennis
ps: have
> Am 10.07.2018 um 16:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.34 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.34 GA.
Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
>> version 2.4.34 can be found at the usual place:
>>
>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>>
>> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.34 GA.
>>
>>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 4:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.34 GA.
[X] +1: Good to go
Tested on Debian(s) 7/8/9, MPMs event/worker/prefork.
Thanks Jim.
+1 for release (binding). I did have http2 test failures (unreviewed) on RHEL
7.4, but it doesn’t appear to be a regression since I see the same failures
against 2.4.33 on my system.
Test Summary Report (2.4.33)
---
t/modules/http2.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 52 Failed
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:03:17AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.34 GA.
>
> [X] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why.
+1 for release, passes test suite on Fedora 28/x86_64, sigs good
+1 for:
o CentOS5, 64bit
o CentOS6, 64bit
o CentOS7, 64bit
o macOS 10.13.5, Xcode9
> On Jul 10, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.34 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.a
I've held off on a T due to the showstoppers in STATUS... We shouldn't
release until they are closed.
> On May 29, 2018, at 12:13 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> I'm game for doing a T today and running the vote through Sunday (since I'm
> out of town starting tomorrow) if
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> I'm game for doing a T today and running the vote through Sunday (since
> I'm out of town starting tomorrow) if we're ready.
>
> Fellow devs?
There are still showstoppers in STATUS that need to be
reviewed/backported before
Le mardi 29 mai 2018 à 18:19 +0200, Graham Leggett a écrit :
> On 29 May 2018, at 6:13 PM, Daniel Ruggeri
> wrote:
>
> > I'm game for doing a T today and running the vote through Sunday
> > (since I'm out of town starting tomorrow) if we're ready.
> >
> > Fellow devs?
>
> +1 and thanks for
On 29 May 2018, at 6:13 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> I'm game for doing a T today and running the vote through Sunday (since I'm
> out of town starting tomorrow) if we're ready.
>
> Fellow devs?
+1 and thanks for this.
Regards,
Graham
—
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
I'm game for doing a T today and running the vote through Sunday (since I'm
out of town starting tomorrow) if we're ready.
Fellow devs?
--
Daniel Ruggeri
On May 29, 2018 10:42:56 AM CDT, "." wrote:
>Hey everyone,
>
> When can we expect a release of 2.4.34?
>
>We
Hey everyone,
When can we expect a release of 2.4.34?
We have been using a patched version of 2.4.33 for the last month or so,
due to the 2.4.33 release having a bug which breaks rproxy connections that
have SSL enabled.
I believe this is referenced as being fixed in the 2.4.34
o suggest a
>> tried-and-true alternative defined by the Apache Subversion project, and
>> documented extensively at [1].
>>
>> That is a lot to wade through, and parts just don't apply ... but even
>> reading some of that could be helpful when read as a comparative
t; reading some of that could be helpful when read as a comparative point to
> how HTTPD historically does its T and branch/release management. That
> Subversion "manual" on releases is very stable, and what we've been
> doing/developed during our 18 years, especially wi
ead as a comparative point to how
> HTTPD historically does its T and branch/release management. That
> Subversion "manual" on releases is very stable, and what we've been
> doing/developed during our 18 years, especially with the project's
> understanding of vers
extensively at [1].
That is a lot to wade through, and parts just don't apply ... but even
reading some of that could be helpful when read as a comparative point to
how HTTPD historically does its T and branch/release management. That
Subversion "manual" on releases is very stable, and
<drugg...@apache.org>
wrote:
Hi, all;
I am pleased to report that the vote to release httpd-2.4.33 has
PASSED with 7 binding votes and 2 non-binding votes. I will begin the
process of pushing the release out to the mirrors today.
Thanks to whoever added it to bugzilla
My pleasure, forgot to
gt;> wrote:
>>>> Hi, all;
>>>> I am pleased to report that the vote to release httpd-2.4.33 has
>>>> PASSED with 7 binding votes and 2 non-binding votes. I will begin the
>>>> process of pushing the release out to the mirrors today.
>>>
&
Le 22/03/2018 à 11:14, Rainer Jung a écrit :
> Am 22.03.2018 um 08:32 schrieb Eric Covener:
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi, all;
>>> I am pleased to report that the vote to release httpd-2.4
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Alain Toussaint <al...@vocatus.pub> wrote:
> Le mercredi 21 mars 2018 à 15:38 +, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit :
>> Hi, all;
>>I am pleased to report that the vote to release httpd-2.4.33 has PASSED
>> with 7 binding votes
&g
Le mercredi 21 mars 2018 à 15:38 +, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit :
> Hi, all;
> I am pleased to report that the vote to release httpd-2.4.33 has PASSED
> with 7 binding votes
> and 2 non-binding votes. I will begin the process of pushing the release out
> to the mirrors tod
Am 22.03.2018 um 08:32 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi, all;
I am pleased to report that the vote to release httpd-2.4.33 has PASSED
with 7 binding votes and 2 non-binding votes. I will begin the process of
p
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi, all;
>I am pleased to report that the vote to release httpd-2.4.33 has PASSED
> with 7 binding votes and 2 non-binding votes. I will begin the process of
> pushing the release out to
On Mittwoch, 21. März 2018 23:33:49 CET Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Is this something I could do as part of the push to the dist release
> mirrors? I have a script that handles the tarballs and doap updates so
> far. I'm also working on one that will also gather details and prep
> announc
Is this something I could do as part of the push to the dist release mirrors? I
have a script that handles the tarballs and doap updates so far. I'm also
working on one that will also gather details and prep announcements if we
should push these updates at that time.
--
Daniel Ruggeri
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 6:43 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
>> Hi, all;
>>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>> https://dist.apache.
w00t w00t!!
> On Mar 21, 2018, at 11:38 AM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
> I am pleased to report that the vote to release httpd-2.4.33 has PASSED
> with 7 binding votes and 2 non-binding votes. I will begin the process of
> pushing the re
Hi, all;
I am pleased to report that the vote to release httpd-2.4.33 has PASSED with
7 binding votes and 2 non-binding votes. I will begin the process of pushing
the release out to the mirrors today.
Cheers!
--
Daniel Ruggeri
On 2018/03/17 23:43:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
> ...
> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> ...
>
+1 for the following test:
system:
kernel:
name: Linux
release: 3.16.0-4-amd64
version: #1 SMP Debian 3.16.39-1 (201
On 18/03/2018 09:43, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tarball as 2.4.33:
>
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:53 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> - compiler warnings:
>
> - modules/core/mod_watchdog.c:436: warning: 'rv' may be used
> uninitialized in this function
> -> only on SLES 11, warning is correct but not critical (debug log);
> not a
Am 18.03.2018 um 00:43 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
tarball as 2.4.33:
[X] +1: It's not just good
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 6:43 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
> Hi, all;
>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release thi
release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
tarball as 2.4.33:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's
+1
- MacOS 10.13.3
- Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
> Am 18.03.2018 um 00:43 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net>:
>
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
> Hi, all;
>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release thi
AM, Petr Gajdos <pgaj...@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 06:43:15PM -0500, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>> Hi, all;
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> Hi,
>
> works
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 06:43:15PM -0500, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
Hi,
works for me
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Apache:Test/apache-test
Petr
> On Mar 17, 2018, at 7:43 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to relea
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
> Hi, all;
>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release thi
±0
Made it available for the AL community.
When some pop's up I try redirect to Bugzilla.
On Sunday 18/03/2018 at 00:43, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
tarball as 2.4.33:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ] -1
Reading backwards... +1 - deferring the announcement would be fine.
We simply can't make 2.4.32 "disappear" as unreleased.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> Just because it is released, doesn't mean we need to announce it. We
> can
On 2018-03-16 08:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just because it is released, doesn't mean we need to announce it. We
can easily release a quick 2.4.33 and announce *that*. 2.4.32 was/is
just an un-announced release.
Personally, I prefer this approach. I've been holding off on sending
Just because it is released, doesn't mean we need to announce it. We
can easily release a quick 2.4.33 and announce *that*. 2.4.32 was/is
just an un-announced release.
> On Mar 15, 2018, at 2:51 PM, Christophe Jaillet
> <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
> Le 15/03/
William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:17:45
-0500):
>That still leaves the headache of fallback-to-release when a candidate on
>these many projects isn't present (actually, the smart election between
>candidate and release if both exist!) But great po
That still leaves the headache of fallback-to-release when a candidate on
these many projects isn't present (actually, the smart election between
candidate and release if both exist!) But great pointer, TY!
On Mar 15, 2018 21:46, "Jan Ehrhardt" <php...@ehrhardt.nl> wrote:
>
William A Rowe Jr in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:11:10
-0500):
>https://github.com/appsuite/oss-httpd-build is where this all lives, and is
>where the localized PERL5LIB schema for all the components will land.
>This can be further streamlined, and the really big caveat is that
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:43 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
This looks sensible, or do we say that users of
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:39 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>>> This looks sensible, or do we say that users of mod_proxy_balancer
>>> on Windows should defer their upgrade? A more limited audience?
>>
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> This looks sensible, or do we say that users of mod_proxy_balancer
>> on Windows should defer their upgrade? A more limited audience?
>
> +1
Should we also mention the regression against mod_security on Windows?
(Nobody
> -Original Message-
> From: William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 4:28 PM
> To: httpd <dev@httpd.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Rugge
> This looks sensible, or do we say that users of mod_proxy_balancer
> on Windows should defer their upgrade? A more limited audience?
+1
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
>
> *** Changes here
>We consider this release to be the best version of Apache available for
>non-Windows platforms, and encourage users of all prior versions to
> upgrade.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 12:09 PM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32
>
> Am 15.03.2018 um 17:34 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
> > On Thu, Mar 15
and conditional BLD=candidate
flavor, because various bits will or will not have a pending release when
combining those packages, and that's something nmake, and even gmake
won't support trivially.
his is not possible using the msi-installer, would
a self-extracting exe be another way?
>With that resolved, just about anyone in the windows community should
>easily build and test when they will, against release, candidate, snapshot
>or bleed.
--
Jan
Rainer Jung in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 18:15:13
+0100):
>The artefacts are on the mirrors and out in the wild, so we can not get
>them back. Best is to soon proceed with the release and document the
>mod_proxy_balancer on Windows regression in the announcement.
+
he.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38
>>> -0400):
>>>>
>>>> +1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't
>>>> quickly/casually picking up source releases.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hmm. 2.4.32 coincided with the monthly Windows Upda
Le 15/03/2018 à 17:34, Yann Ylavic a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will
see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be made public via
ANNOUNCE.
Thought
source releases.
Hmm. 2.4.32 coincided with the monthly Windows Update and with a curl
release. I upgraded everything yesterday...
Sorry -- I should have said "most/typical" Windows users.
The question now is about the pro/con of completely finalizing the
2.4.32 release or not -- eith
Am 15.03.2018 um 17:34 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will
see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be made public via
ANNOUNCE.
Thought
gt;
> Hmm. 2.4.32 coincided with the monthly Windows Update and with a curl
> release. I upgraded everything yesterday...
Sorry -- I should have said "most/typical" Windows users.
The question now is about the pro/con of completely finalizing the
2.4.32 release or not -- either way eve
gt;
> Hmm. 2.4.32 coincided with the monthly Windows Update and with a curl
> release. I upgraded everything yesterday...
There is no (known) issue if mod_proxy_loadbalancer is not involved, is it?
Eric Covener in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:35:38
-0400):
>+1, probably the least confusing, and Windows users aren't
>quickly/casually picking up source releases.
Hmm. 2.4.32 coincided with the monthly Windows Update and with a curl
release. I upgraded everything yes
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
>>
>> Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will
>> see it through quickl
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
>
> Personally, I would like to see *another* T (again, I volunteer and will
> see it through quickly) and no mention of this release be made public via
> ANNOUNCE.
> Thoughts?
I think we should
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 12:00 PM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32
>
> Hi, all;
>
> On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri"
Hi
> On 13 Mar 2018, at 16:59, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
>
>> On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
>> Hi, all;
>>
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and
Am 14.03.2018 um 16:10 schrieb Joe Orton:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:56:19PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
This looks like the failure I see when localhost resolves to both ::1
and 127.0.0.1, which happens with modern Fedora hosts:
$ grep localhost /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost
Am 14.03.2018 um 19:59 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri:
On 2018-03-14 09:56, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:10:20PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
All 280 builds succeeded.
Geez, now I feel bad just testing one build ;) Great stuff!
+1! Rainer must be a machine... or, perhaps only
On 2018-03-14 09:56, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:10:20PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
All 280 builds succeeded.
Geez, now I feel bad just testing one build ;) Great stuff!
+1! Rainer must be a machine... or, perhaps only partially... cyborg,
maybe?
Regardless, I always look
+1! All good
THX!
> On Mar 9, 2018, at 9:49 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
>
> Hi, all;
>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:56:19PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> This looks like the failure I see when localhost resolves to both ::1
> and 127.0.0.1, which happens with modern Fedora hosts:
>
> $ grep localhost /etc/hosts
> 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4
.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4 localhost4.localdomain4
::1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost6 localhost6.localdomain6
The fixes are on trunk and I intend to propose for backport to 2.4 after
this release. If you comment out the ::1 line in /etc/hosts it also
works. Mi
Am 10.03.2018 um 03:49 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate tarball as 2.4.32:
[X] +1: It's not just
as soon as our site is updated and
refers to the current release, why not apply the same standard to
any out of date unsupported version minor?
Users running 2.2.x and earlier perhaps want to reference the docs.
We as devs want to reference historical docs (when did that change,
and when did we
iles from the distribution site.
>>
>> These remain available from http://archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/
>>
>>
>> Removed:
> []
>> release/httpd/patches/apply_to_2.2.34/
>
> Why? First this directory was not empty (IIRC), and I think it could
> be used
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:34 PM, <wr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Tue Mar 13 20:34:36 2018
> New Revision: 25693
>
> Log:
> Drop unsupported files from the distribution site.
>
> These remain available from http://archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/
&
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 8:49 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
> Hi, all;
>
>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to relea
+1
Darwin 17.4.0
> Am 13.03.2018 um 14:36 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net>:
>
> Thanks, Steffen;
> Do you have a degree of confidence to record a vote on the release one way or
> the other?
> --
> Daniel Ruggeri
>
> On March 13
Hi, all;
On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
> Hi, all;
>
>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
>
>
> I would like to ca
+0
When there some pop's up from the AL community, I let it know.
On Tuesday 13/03/2018 at 14:37, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
Thanks, Steffen;
Do you have a degree of confidence to record a vote on the release one
way or the other?
--
Daniel Ruggeri
On March 13, 2018 8:25:35 AM CDT
Thanks, Steffen;
Do you have a degree of confidence to record a vote on the release one way
or the other?
--
Daniel Ruggeri
On March 13, 2018 8:25:35 AM CDT, Steffen <i...@apachelounge.com> wrote:
>
>For testing available at
>www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=36581#365
For testing available at
www.apachelounge.com/viewtopic.php?p=36581#36581
Attention.
An extra fix is applied for crashing external modules like
mod_security. Expected is that this fix is becoming official in the
next release. Thanks Yann Ylavic !
As usual report issues to me, AL or here
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:49 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
> Hi, all;
>
>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
>
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next f
aniel Ruggeri" <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
Hi, all;
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this
candidate
tarball as 2.4.32:
[ ] +1: It's not just
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote:
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tarball as 2.4.32:
>
+1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
All fine (no regression) on up to date Debian's 9
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:49:15PM -0600, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
>
>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidat
On 10/03/2018 12:49, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Hi, all;
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate
> tarball
801 - 900 of 4444 matches
Mail list logo