[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13249482#comment-13249482
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4787:
Tom,
Please open a new Jira for It's
Hi Pierre,
now that we have a tentative release plan:
http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html
it would be easy to setup in Jira versions for upcoming releases (with a
release date); at the moment we could add:
10.04.02 with release date 2012-04-30
11.04.01 with release date 2012-05-31
Does it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3790.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Closing, see
On Apr 8, 2012, at 2:35 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Jacopo,
You removed the trunk download from the download page which was there from
the start without trying to get a consensus.
What are you talking about? I am shocked about how imprecise but this is
blatant is ridiculous: what is the
Using GZip compression for js/css files
---
Key: OFBIZ-4792
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4792
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: ALL APPLICATIONS,
Jacopo, i have a very simple question about a link which always worked:
http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/ofbiz-trunk-current.zip
It was normally shown on this page:
http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/
now it does not work anymore.
My point is that this link should
To summarize: you were accusing me and pointing your finger to my commit even
if my commit doesn't have anything to do with what you are reporting here.
Jacopo
On Apr 8, 2012, at 9:03 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
Jacopo, i have a very simple question about a link which always worked:
By the way, an interesting resource is the Release FAQ:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
I am quoting here a relevant part:
=
What Is A Release?
Releases are, by definition, anything that is published beyond the group that
owns it. In our case, that means
Hi Jacopo,
if that is the case i apologize, we got so far carried away, i lost
track completely, that i went back to the original question.
Regards,
Hans
On 04/08/2012 02:45 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
To summarize: you were accusing me and pointing your finger to my commit even
if my
It is very normal in FICO solutions to have as much as possible a
separation of concern implemented. This is applicable with regards to
inbound and outbound money flows (AR vs AP), and in and outbound flow of
goods (and the valueation thereof in FICO). For that (larger) companies
ensure that
Do not include any links on the project website that might encourage
non-developers to download and use nightly builds, snapshots, release
candidates, or any other similar package.
Jacopo
On Apr 8, 2012, at 10:12 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
The page has a button Download to point a user
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-4792:
---
Priority: Trivial (was: Major)
Affects Version/s: (was: Release Branch
Wow what a long thread for such a simple issue, thanks for being so patient
Jacopo.
At the end of the day users simply shouldn't be downloading the trunk, it's
intended for OFBiz developers and testers only. To pretend that the trunk is
bug free is and all problems are fixed within hours is
Hi Jacopo,
Currently following releases are identified on the web page (with their
respective target dates):
- April 2012 - Apache OFBiz 10.04.02
- October 2012 - Apache OFBiz 10.04.03
- April 2013 - Apache OFBiz 10.04.04 (last release of the 10.04 series)
Tentative release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Francis ANDRE updated OFBIZ-4793:
-
Attachment: ofbiz-admin-port.patch
unify admin port and key setting: single point of
unify admin port and key setting: single point of definition in start.properties
Key: OFBIZ-4793
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4793
Project: OFBiz
The instructions seem quite clear to me.
Regards
Scott
On 7/04/2012, at 10:09 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I meant this should awake a committer, at least one person should be aware of
that...
Jacques
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
Just look into *.java you will find
Hi Pierre,
I understand what you propose and it makes sense; I am onlya bit worried about
the confusion of having tom many versions in Jira.
For example, if a bug fix is provided for the 10.04 series, then it should be
most likely planned to be included in the upcoming release 10.04.02; I don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13249504#comment-13249504
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4792:
You are missing a point Mandeep.
OFBiz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13249505#comment-13249505
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4792:
Note that for bigest files we already use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13249506#comment-13249506
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4792:
and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-4792:
---
Component/s: (was: ALL APPLICATIONS)
(was:
Hi All,
I think it is very unwise to let endusers use the most disruptive version
available (the trunk) for evaluation purposes. It should only be available
for developers or other, more technically experienced persons who want to
assess the underlying (technical) implementations.
We have both
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-4792:
---
Description:
The idea is to create an ant task using
Hi Jacopo,
I agree with you that it doesn't make sense to communicate to many
releases. It creates expectations with end uses, it might create confusion
with reporters of issues and puts developers and committers under pressure.
That is why in other projects, where proper change management and
Hi all,
I don't know having this in OFBiz affects performance when OFBiz is behind
a webserver (like Apache HTTP) via normal proxy processes or via ajp, which
are standard scenarios in in a multi-tier, high availability/failover setup.
Regards,
Op 8 april 2012 11:13 schreef Jacques Le Roux
I will create a JIRA for this,
But for testing what port numbers will we have for:
- ajp
- http
- https
- others?
Regards,
Pierre
Op 8 april 2012 07:54 schreef Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com het volgende:
+1
On May 13, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Erwan de FERRIERES
set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)
--
Key: OFBIZ-4794
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type:
Hi Scott,
So you committed this I see now
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1040016view=rev
Whay did you not remove it? Is there a reason or only an oversight?
Is it the only thing to do? What about @Deprecated processEventReminder method?
Should we keep EventReminders.properties file, etc. ?
I agree with Jacopo, KISS please, we have already enough work...
Jacques
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
Hi Pierre,
I understand what you propose and it makes sense; I am onlya bit worried about
the confusion of having tom many versions in Jira.
For example, if a
I would prefer a category for each major release number. The revision or
minor release number can be specified in each issue.
-Adrian
On 4/8/2012 10:05 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Pierre,
I understand what you propose and it makes sense; I am onlya bit worried about
the confusion of
I suggest to increase by one the last ports numbers to avoid collission even when shifted (see below) for instance
RMI = 1099+1 = 1100
- ajp
8009+1 = 8010
etc.
Because I already suggested to follow Geronimo's way in OFBiz integration in Apache
sonar instance thread
Geronimo does this.
You can also use mod_proxy + mod_deflate to do that but why do it since it's
already included in OFBiz (same with nginx, etc.)?
So no, I don't think it adds any performance impact if you don't use
mod_deflate and I believe it should be very minor if ever you
do it twice (but again don't do it
Hi Jaques,
All the answers are pretty obvious (to me at least) after a minute's look at
the commit, but I'll humor you anyway.
On 8/04/2012, at 10:08 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Scott,
So you committed this I see now
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1040016view=rev
What did you not
Move SHARK to attic
---
Key: OFBIZ-4795
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4795
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Task
Components: specialpurpose/shark
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter:
Mmm.. finally this is wrong. Because if you use ajp then you bypass http/s
connectors and you should handle compression using
mod_proxy + mod_deflate in HTTPD
Sorry for the confusion
Note: this is out of OFBiz scope
Jacques
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
You can also use
Note that, if you use something else than AJP (nginx with haproxy for instance)
you will still use Tomcat HTTP connectors hence
internal OFBiz compression...
I have added text/javascript,text/css as new compressableMimeTypes at r1310975
What about adding property compressionMinSize=2048/?
It
Hi all,
As it is more likely that port numbers near the ones we have are already
taken, I support the schema mentioned by Jacques relating to the Geronimo
variant.
1 current port number for integrated testing set ups (Jenkins), leading
to:
11099
18009
18080
18443
Regards,
Pierre
Op 8 april
From: Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com
Hi All,
I think it is very unwise to let endusers use the most disruptive version
available (the trunk) for evaluation purposes. It should only be available
for developers or other, more technically experienced persons who want to
assess the underlying
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Hi Jaques,
All the answers are pretty obvious (to me at least) after a minute's look at
the commit, but I'll humor you anyway.
Thanks for the answer, with humour is better :o)
On 8/04/2012, at 10:08 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Scott,
So you
On 8/04/2012, at 11:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Hi Jaques,
All the answers are pretty obvious (to me at least) after a minute's look at
the commit, but I'll humor you anyway.
Thanks for the answer, with humour is better :o)
On 8/04/2012,
Mmm, nope, sorry you did not get my point Pierre,
What I mean is this for test-containers.xml ports
RMI = 1099+1 = 1100
- ajp
8009+1 = 8010
1. In all case change test-containers.xml ports by adding 1 to them (I added 1, we could add 100 or whatever). That is change them
now and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-4794:
Attachment: OFBIZ-4794-test-ports.patch
This patch sets the different port numbers for CI testing
Hi Jacques, all,
I concur that we need
1. a change of base port numbers in test-containers.xml to enable
continuous integration for sequential testing (as standard ports are
already (most likely) used by the underlying application server).
2. a dynamic change of port numbers to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13249527#comment-13249527
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4794:
Nope, please see [my answer on dev
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
For instance you could want to not only run many OFBiz instances on the same machine (eg: for devs manual tests on staging) but
also many test instances on another one.
One test instance may run only quick check (for instance unit tests only on
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
On 8/04/2012, at 11:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Hi Jaques,
All the answers are pretty obvious (to me at least) after a minute's look at
the commit, but I'll humor you anyway.
Thanks for the answer,
Indeed!
Op 8 april 2012 13:36 schreef Jacques Le Roux
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.comhet volgende:
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
For instance you could want to not only run many OFBiz instances on the
same machine (eg: for devs manual tests on staging) but also many test
On 8/04/2012, at 11:29 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
On 8/04/2012, at 11:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Hi Jaques,
All the answers are pretty obvious (to me at least) after a minute's look
at the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-4792:
---
Description:
The idea is to create an ant task which uses
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-4792:
--
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Add a yui-compressor-ant-task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13249530#comment-13249530
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4792:
Commited initial work at revision:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13249532#comment-13249532
]
Mandeep Sidhu commented on OFBIZ-4792:
--
I analyzed the URL being accessed by my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mandeep Sidhu updated OFBIZ-4792:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was: I analyzed the URL being accessed by my application, I am trying to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13249534#comment-13249534
]
Mandeep Sidhu commented on OFBIZ-4792:
--
my bad, I am just being ignorant here, I was
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
On 8/04/2012, at 11:29 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
On 8/04/2012, at 11:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Hi Jaques,
All the answers are pretty obvious (to me at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4792.
--
Resolution: Fixed
I think it's enough OOTB. Now users will have to care in production...
Hi Erwan, all,
I have currently setup a test environment for continuous integration with
Jenkins wereby I have following build/test setup configured:
1. pull from svn trunk the latest code (works perfectly - triggers 2)
2. Do ant targets clean-all, build and load-demo (works perfectly
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13249562#comment-13249562
]
Tom Burns commented on OFBIZ-4787:
--
I will create a new issue for It's country...
Your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13249574#comment-13249574
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4787:
Thank you for the compliment. Actually
On Apr 8, 2012, at 4:30 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
4. Do ant target run-tests (fails - see below - triggers 5 even when
fails)
Pierre, I don't know if it is useful but run-tests completes successfully in my
local box.
Jacopo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-4588:
--
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Use flexibleStringRenderer for alt-target element on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4588.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Thanks Nicolas,
Your patch is in trunk at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13249606#comment-13249606
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4782:
Hi Nicolas,
You missed to add
import
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-4472:
--
Assignee: (was: Jacques Le Roux)
New element auto-parameters-entity for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-4467:
--
Assignee: (was: Jacques Le Roux)
Improve auto-fields-entity (select include
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13249604#comment-13249604
]
Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-4588 at 4/8/12 9:38 PM:
Current SVN does not work with INR as the default currency.
---
Key: OFBIZ-4796
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4796
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
68 matches
Mail list logo
