On Nov 16, 2012, at 5:40 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Nov 15, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 11/14/2012 05:06 PM, TJ Frazier wrote:
On 11/14/2012 18:47, Kay Schenk wrote:
HI --
Could one of our BZ
Hi Joe,
Thanks!
On Nov 21, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
With the holiday weekend coming up, I'd like
to suggest that that's as good a time as any
to adjust the location of your svn tree to
top-level. Instead of doing a straight svn mv
of the tree, I plan to copy it instead and
On Nov 22, 2012, at 3:50 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 11/21/12 10:14 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 11/21/2012 09:41 PM, schrieb jan iversen:
On 21 November 2012 21:30, Andrea Pescettipesce...@apache.org wrote:
Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I got the impression that the majority would support a
Hi Phil,
It is not completely impossible that an extension could be added to AOO to read
and write Publisher files. It just takes one or two Java programmers with the
time and interest. See [1] for where the effort could start.
On Nov 22, 2012, at 8:36 AM, Fernand Vanrie wrote:
Juergen,
On Nov 22, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 22/11/2012 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 11/21/12 10:14 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 11/21/2012 09:41 PM, schrieb jan iversen:
On 21 November 2012 21:30, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I would propose the following:
- We announce on ooo-l10n that 2
Sorry to top post. Jspwiki has been in the incubator for a few years. There is
no guarantee it will ever graduate. They have not switched completely to ASF
infrastructure. Please look in the general@i.a.o archives and the incubator
board reports.
While this discussion is good lets not be
The transition to TLP is not complete. We do not use JIRA. We have our bugzilla
instance
Regards,
Save
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 3, 2012, at 1:19 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
When I look in www.apache.org projects, take indexes, I cannot find:
Apache OpenOffice
OpenOffice
or
OOO
Oliver-Ranier,
You have written an excellent summary.
These releases both official source releases and user convenience binaries
are distinct and voted. These should not be confused with the following:
(1) current svn source trunk.
(2) binaries built for QA, l10n, or other purposes especially
On Dec 6, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Andrew Rist wrote:
On 12/6/2012 9:40 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote:
On 06.12.2012 00:03, Kay Schenk wrote:
I put in a request, as part of our graduation process, to have our
dist area moved to a top
On Dec 12, 2012, at 6:55 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
If we're going to have all of these wiki account requests via email,
would it makes sense to create a special admin list (or webmaster
list) for these and similar requests, and maybe also for general
website development topics?
sysadmin requests
On Dec 17, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Andrea,
On Dec 16, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Dave Fisher wrote:
I think that we can purge these *.htm duplicates, but if we do
On Dec 17, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Dave Fisher wrote on Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:20:05 -0800:
On Dec 17, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Andrea,
On Dec 16, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Andrea Pescetti
On Dec 17, 2012, at 12:44 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Dec 17, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Dave Fisher wrote on Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:20:05 -0800:
On Dec 17, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi
On Dec 17, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Alternately you could write a positive
regexp and a pass_thru view to view.pm
a'la
sub pass_thru {
my %args = @_;
open my $fh, $args{path} or die Can't open
One of the ways that sites that offer downloads of Apache OpenOffice (or
OpenOffice.org) often do is:
(1) Don't acknowledge that the trademarks are the Apache Software Foundation's.
(2) Make use of the project's and ASF's resources to offer free support and
other downloads.
They simply hide
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 25, 2012, at 7:22 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
FWIW;
It also came to my memory that there was the idea to attempt merging
at least some of the documentation from MWiki to CWiki by using this
plugin:
Hi JanI,
Thanks for your work here!
On Dec 27, 2012, at 12:47 PM, janI wrote:
the Wiki is very slow these days, it is NOT because of spam attack, but
actually something positive.
We have loads of users, seeking all kind of information, according to the
access log.
Does anyone have
!
And THANK YOU JAN for your hard work! Your contributions are appreciated!
Regards,
Dave
Jan i
Den 31/12/2012 19.23 skrev Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net:
Hi Andrew,
On Dec 31, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Andrew Rist wrote:
On 12/31/2012 2:09 AM, janI wrote:
Is there a reason why we use our own
Hi Michael,
I like the logo - a lot.
I have a problem with the video that is significant. You are using the same
music that Microsoft is using for its Surface Advertising on TV. Also, at the
end you are using a non-standard Apache Software Foundation logo and feather
placement.
Although we
HI Rob,
I like your emphasis here on Supported. Let's discuss support in terms of
actual process and precisely what are official releases vs. user convenience
releases. Both of which are VOTED, but only the source code release can be
completely vetted by all of the project. The convenience
HI Andrea,
We need to fill out a project DOAP file in order to be listed on www.apache.org
on the bottom left.
Regards,
Dave
Begin forwarded message:
From: Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org
Date: January 2, 2013 5:28:58 PM PST
To: gene...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: DOAP
On Jan 3, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
Here's is the latest/final draft for the proposed new user portal web site
home page incorporating News scrolling:
http://www.openoffice.org/test/
I like it. Great work.
I am invoking lazy consensus for this change. If I hear no complaints
Maybe you all are on different browsers?
Good luck herding these cats ... a little cat cha cha.
Regards,
Dave
On Jan 4, 2013, at 2:34 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi all,
I run into the same problem. I do not get my page saved. In the help text for
that captcha it is mentioned, that there
On Jan 7, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
snip
Since this is the visitors first impression of the project, I wonder
if it is worth exploring
On Jan 8, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net wrote:
Hello all,
I'm back on the dev mailing list because there are some interesting topics
sometimes. But no further involvement in the AOO project anymore.
Before AOO
The solution is already found on the Forum. Here is a shortened version of the
long unsaved version.
http://s.apache.org/xLN
Regards,
Dave
On Jan 14, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi -
Works for me without
On Jan 14, 2013, at 2:46 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 12.01.2013 00:39, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Jan 11, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 01/11/2013 03:06 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 1/10/13 3:56 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 10.01.2013 11:55, Rony
Hi Rob,
Would you please discuss this change.
Thanks,
Dave
On Jan 18, 2013, at 5:24 AM, robw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: robweir
Date: Fri Jan 18 13:24:28 2013
New Revision: 1435127
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1435127view=rev
Log:
Remove reference to the redundant file list
On Jan 21, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jan 21, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
Since this has come up recently, I'd like to point you
On Jan 21, 2013, at 6:49 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jan 21, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Rob Weir robw
On Jan 21, 2013, at 7:02 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Take a look at the lovely new page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice
Some choice bits of distortion:
Thanks for publicising this. I really did mean I wanted more eyes on it.
On Jan 23, 2013, at 7:12 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hello;
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Jürgen Schmidt
If we are distributing code there it is our responsibility.
I am afraid there are also tarballs that deserve special consideration.
I recall we were carrying a GPL'd
LGTM! I would not wait very long to publish it.
Regards,
Dave
On Feb 1, 2013, at 4:39 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I drafted a short article on what's coming at FOSDEM this weekend. You can
find the draft at
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=apache_openoffice_at_fosdem_2013
On Feb 1, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Feb 1, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hello;
I know this can easily become the biggest bikeshed ever ...
Can we change the red title in the website (Call for Volunteers,
as of lately) to dark blue?
The reasons:
.
Regards,
Dave
TMCM
On Feb 1, 2013 9:43 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Da: Dave Fisher
...
Can we change the red title in the website (Call for Volunteers,
as of lately) to dark blue?
The reasons:
- The tone of red chosen looks like
On Feb 1, 2013, at 3:16 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Feb 1, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Thank you Dave!
It's still perfectly visible without being too scandalous. I like it.
Now for a new bikeshed ... I would use Volunteers wanted, instead of
Volunteers needed
The next shed to bike ;-)
On Feb 1, 2013, at 3:21 PM, w...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wave
Date: Fri Feb 1 23:21:23 2013
New Revision: 1441659
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441659view=rev
Log:
No clear link back to www.openoffice.org
Modified:
for OpenOffice and that is great!
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 2, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Rob Weir rabas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 1, 2013, at 11:01 PM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Dave Fisher
I have no problem with the change that you made, and I said so in my initial
reply.
My problem is the way that you characterized it. You can be more polite. For
example, I like the link you added, but I think that the (R) is not correct
and so I removed it...
That is all I'm going to say
On Feb 5, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de
wrote:
Hi Rob,
Rob Weir schrieb:
You can see our current Bugzilla taxonomy here:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/describecomponents.cgi
We have around 50 top-level
On Feb 5, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Feb 5, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de
wrote:
Hi Rob,
Rob Weir schrieb:
You can see our
Hi Rob,
This is great information. It makes me very proud to be a part of Apache
OpenOffice.
This is something that should be part of our next board report. It is probably
worth discussing if this is press release material with Sally at press@
Thanks and Regards,
Dave
On Feb 6, 2013, at 5:43
Hi Sally,
Please see this message thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-dev/201302.mbox/%3CCAP-ksoiJx5QqRvAQpHTJJ2_VasPCji9gTi4R3PH8bg_ntwkJ9A%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Rob is working on a blog post, but I think that this is something worthy of an
ASF press release as it shows
On Feb 5, 2013, at 8:26 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Is there any recommendation/objection on this? After hsqldb I would
like to move on to lucene.
In this case, it would be nice to investigate if lucence can be replaced
by clucene, this will reduce the need of installing Java for
Rob,
Please count how much of the emails in these inordinate threads are your emails.
Please review the following: http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
Thank you.
Regards,
Dave
On Feb 15, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Rob Weir
On Feb 16, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Would someone please add my login to the editcomponents group so that I can
follow the links
On Feb 20, 2013, at 8:13 AM, Samer Mansour wrote:
Hello AOO Dev and Marketing Community,
The main subject of this e-mail is to call for an end date to proposals.
In 72hrs (saturday) we will be closing branding proposals.
- - - - -
I am heading up the branding effort for the AOO 4.0
(Note this discussion is going to be difficult because we are posting
between two lists.)
Adding back marketing, who are doing wonderful work.
On Feb 21, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Feb 20, 2013, at 8:13
On Feb 21, 2013, at 4:02 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
(Note this discussion is going to be difficult because we are posting
between two lists.)
Adding back marketing, who are doing wonderful work.
Look at http://flex.apache.org/.
It might be an inspiration for someone.
Regards,
Dave
On Feb 22, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Looking at how these sites are actually being used, it looks more like:
1) Users offering monetary
On Feb 25, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=call_for_documentation_volunteers
Looks good. Did
Only if we are going to become a Review Then Commit project.
Otherwise I think it becomes yet another system to learn how to use.
On Mar 8, 2013, at 9:10 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
https://reviews.apache.org
I didn't know that this existed at Apache. Should we be using it?
-Rob
On Mar 8, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:21 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 8 March 2013 22:16, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Only if we are going to become a Review Then Commit
I am personally fine with whatever you do along the lines of surfacing current
planning efforts and archiving old efforts.
For cwiki articles that should be moved to Mwiki then perhaps a For MWiki
category would make sense.
If you need someone with full confluence admin rights let me know, I'm
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 18, 2013, at 8:22 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
wrote:
From my perspective, Jörg's concern is very simple.
There are actions and arrangements that have been made that encourage
Top post.
There is no consensus here to eliminate or reset the votes. Some who are more
in touch with users have stated that it would be harmful. I trust their
judgement.
Issues that are recent that get votes should be discernible by developers
looking at BZ. Any issue with a lot of votes
In these situations it is best to get on irc #asfinfra and ask in general about
it. Imacat might be there but there is usually at least one infra person on
line.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 20, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Hagar Delest wrote:
It has worked
The community still needs a LAMP / MySQL sysadmin to check the tuning so that
connection leaks don't take it down later (or sooner)
If someone in the project did the work we should be informed.
Thanks,
Dave
On Mar 21, 2013, at 10:14 AM, FR web forum wrote:
Well, the forums are fluids now
This has win, win, win all over it!
Does this allow 4.0 to co-exist with 3.4.1 or LO?
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 22, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org
wrote:
Great work Jürgen, I am impressed.
--
Andrew Pitonyak
My Macro Document:
On Mar 29, 2013, at 1:31 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Robin Fowler
robin.fow...@outlook.comwrote:
Due to the opinions I've seen so far I've decided to make a new design:
,
Dave
On Mar 29, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
If you go with a stylized feather, please check with trademarks@ a.o.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 13:52
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Hi Marcus,
On Mar 31, 2013, at 8:12 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Hi Rob,
I want to cleanup the structure and remove 1 of the 2 directories for images.
Therefore I've added the images from download/images also to images/ and
updated the download/index.html to point to the new location.
I'm going to top-post. I agree that this is a good idea, but I want to define
it expansively as a positive.
(1) The current authz that defines all of the AOO committers must be preserved.
This is used to generate foundation information like:
be part of the disease, not
the
cure
[;).
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 08:57
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Improve security by limiting committer
access
in SVN
Dave
We can easily copy the Donate button from the footer to the topnav.
We can request that l10n teams add a translated donate button for their
language. If they haven't translated their brand and topnav now would a time to
do so. We would want to translate the fundraising page, too.
Is this a
All image directories and img links can be discovered and converted in an
offline checkout of the site.
It could be automated. Different image files of the same name can be diffed. It
is all discoverable.
Doing it manually is a mess. I discovered this during the ooo-site port from
Oracle's
On Apr 5, 2013, at 8:02 AM, janI wrote:
On 5 April 2013 16:52, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 5 April 2013 14:50, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com
On Apr 6, 2013, at 2:51 AM, janI wrote:
Hi.
Now that our wiki (mwiki) runs smoothly and performs quite well, it is
slowly time to take a look at our other services.
In order to determine what should/can be done, I need some figures.
Can anybody help me with traffic figures for
On Apr 9, 2013, at 4:08 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 04/09/2013 11:46 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Apr 19, 2013, at 5:37 AM, janI wrote:
On 19 April 2013 13:48, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 7:39 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 19 April 2013 13:29, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 7:20 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On
On Apr 22, 2013, at 2:13 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 22.04.2013 09:03, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Idea is pretty simple, with impress you can generate swf files with
the slides from Impress. The animation code was broken for several
ages. However, swf format has been somewhat fall on
Guys,
http://openoffice.apache.org/list-conduct.html
And if you are posting so many times in a single thread then I wonder if the
purpose is immolation or what? The oxygen is certainly sucked out of what is an
important decision - the community decision about releasing and when.
We should go
This query was moderated into the list. I've included Martin in the response.
On Apr 27, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2013 00:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Martin Obrien pingjock...@ameritech.net wrote:
I am trying to get help with a sudden aberration I am experiencing with
On Apr 29, 2013, at 6:56 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
@Daniel,
Right, this is about poisoning the committer keys but not touching the SVN,
instead, counterfeiting a binary release downstream, but faking the asc, md5,
and sha1 too. (These would not be at dist, and depend on folks not
Hi,
I have confirmed that this particular header does not occur anywhere else in
the active codebase.
Regards,
Dave
On Apr 30, 2013, at 6:07 AM, Marc Rabell wrote:
Thanks for clarifying Andre.
Regards,
Marc
Marc Rabell
twitter https://twitter.com/mrabell |
A caution and something to keep in mind and I am speaking from experience.
Payment to a developer for working on a feature must not be tied or made
contingent on that feature becoming part of the product. The developer
ultimately has no control over the inclusion of a feature in a release.
On May 6, 2013, at 10:44 AM, Donald Whytock wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
I personally wouldn't lose any time redesigning the visual identity UNLESS
the new design is clearly superior with the old one, and there's concensus
that there's
Hi Don,
You should have received your invitation.
Regards,
Dave
On May 15, 2013, at 3:16 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
Hi Marcus/Dave...
I have a Roller account now, and my proposal went through for blog access.
Please grant blog access to dwhytock.
Thanks...
Don
Hi Rob,
This is a very well written summary of the situation with Code Signing.
The main concern that the ASF has with digitally signing with a singular
apache.org certificate for the whole foundation is keeping it in strict
control. For some this means physical machines. This is a high bar.
On May 27, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:58 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
problems I see. And I would like to
On May 27, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
[This was cross-posted, so I'm not clear what list was intended. Makes
tracking the discussion difficult.]
I'll bite:
I prefer Chris's latest. The weight of the lettering is more powerful. I
think the Apache should not be so
Hi -
I just now reviewed Jürgen's latest snapshot build and I have some trademark
concerns. The current UI and Help file seem to be out of Apache Branding
policy[1][2] in two ways.
(1) The most prominent use of the brand in many place is OpenOffice when it
ought to be Apache OpenOffice. This
Hi,
Kevin's book birds use perspective drawing techniques and converge on the
horizon. They are going somewhere.
The standard gulls are more like two birds in the standard wingman formation.
OpenOffice is your wingman to take you where you want to go.
Regards,
Dave
On May 28, 2013, at 10:12
On May 28, 2013, at 3:03 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 5/28/13 4:12 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On May 27, 2013, at 8:28 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi -
I just now reviewed Jürgen's latest snapshot build and I have some
trademark concerns. The current UI and Help file seem
Hi Rob,
On May 29, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Description is: Issues related to NOTICE, LICENSE files, trademarks
or similar legal or policy
On Jun 5, 2013, at 12:37 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:50 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 5 June 2013 17:43, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:34 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 5 June 2013 16:48, Rob Weir
On Jun 8, 2013, at 5:34 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 06/06/2013 Rob Weir wrote:
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=when_will_openoffice_version_x
Since we get this question frequently, I thought it would be good to
have a canonical response we can point people to.
It's
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 7, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 9, 2013, at 7:36 AM, janI wrote:
On 9 June 2013 16:04, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that LibreO has 26 Certified Developers.
http://www.documentfoundation.org/certification/developers/
While we have the concept of a committer here at AOO is there
something
post. This
could also point to our full committer count to show that the project values
all contributions.
We can also emphasize that at the ASF it is individuals and not companies that
are contributing.
Regards,
Dave
On 9 June 2013 17:24, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jun 9
On Jun 11, 2013, at 9:20 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Both Andrea Pescetti and Andrew Rist were among those elected as new
ASF Members.
Congratulations for the well-deserved recognition!
-Rob
YES! Congratulations
On Jun 11, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:46 PM,
On Jun 20, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
In case you are not following the discussion on the dev list, Juergen,
the 4.0 Release Manager, has proposed an endgame schedule for the AOO
4.0 release:
On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
Hi Rob,
I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
I'm with you, that we have to make
Hi -
To make it official and so that we are all clear.
The following rules apply to links to third party products and related new
announcements only.
(1) Have a project wide 3rd party page in English.
(2) Each language community may choose to have a separate 3rd party page. (For
example a
On Jun 22, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt
On Jun 21, 2013, at 7:21 AM, Peter Junge wrote:
On 6/21/2013 9:59 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
What is the problem?
The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
and approved for release by the project. It is a
On Jul 1, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
On 6/27/2013 9:00 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
The Mercurial repository at http://hg.services.openoffice.org/ is no longer
current but it is still useful since it contains important historical
information.
It is still hosted by Oracle and
On Jul 4, 2013, at 8:18 AM, Pedro Marquez wrote:
Dear Sir:
I´ve been trying to download the OpenOffice software from:
http://www.openoffice.org/es/descargar/
However, it always respond with:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/es/3.4.
Hi Dave,
Welcome! The first step in volunteering is to subscribe to this dev list.
If you would like to help us with building installation packages for WIndows
platforms then you should start by learning how to build from here:
http://openoffice.apache.org/source.html
This may be a difficult
1 - 100 of 877 matches
Mail list logo
