ons for me, so please do not fill my inbox
(I read dev@ from time to time).
rgds
jan i
>
> Regards
> Damjan
>
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
chair and Infra.
As I have said many times I am part of Infra and part of apache, so
naturally I am available for help when needed, but please do not use me as
a go-between infra and the project.
rgds
jan i
On Friday, September 11, 2015, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 14/08/2015 jan i wro
On Friday, September 11, 2015, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 14/08/2015 jan i wrote:
>
>> this might be a good time for a new maintainer to step up.
>> The actual maintenance is about 1 hour pr month.
>>
>
> Coming back to this, it is likely to be easier to fi
Just a small correction, 2 of the past chairs (meaning all) are members of
apache. Andrea is member and so am I.
rgds
jan i.
wrong list sorry.
rgds
jan i
-- Forwarded message --
From: *jan i*
Date: Monday, August 24, 2015
Subject: Mentor hat and advice
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Hi folks
We should be celebrating our first release, it is getting close and we have
the IPMC votes we need, so now we
emails you can write, that emails will in
the future be
forwarded to e.g. private@, that way the sender has received a fair warning.
REMARK, the above is only an advice I give because I was asked, this is not
something you
need to follow in any way.
Rgds
jan I.
Ps. Could this day please be a day
project as such and unsubscribe from the
lists.
I wish the project all the best in the future. Even considering all the bad
discussion, I
still look back on some nice memories.
rgds
jan i.
On 20 August 2015 at 12:53, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> [X] +1, Dennis Hamilton as new Chair
>
>
From: Tony Stevenson [mailto:t...@pc-tony.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 12:54
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Maintenance of AOO Wiki and Forum
>
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, at 01:31 PM, jan i wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > The AOO Forum vm could do with an
+0 (binding)
No need for a vote.
not even having discussed multiple candidates shows quite accurate the
state of the project.
rgds
jan i
On 16 August 2015 at 08:57, jan i wrote:
> This is a call for a formal vote among the 1 candidate for the AOO Chair
> role.
>
> Due to the fac
care if Dennis Hamilton becomes new Chair
[ ] -1, I am against Dennis Hamilton becomes new chair
(out of curtesy, please add another suggestion).
Have fun voting.
rgds
jan i.
.
rgds
jan I.
On 3 August 2015 at 20:34, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
> > On 31 Jul 15, at 17:40, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Roberto Galoppini
> >> wro
help as
backstopper in case of problems.
I believe it is better for the project to have a person that is active in
the project, and participates on the mailing lists than one who do not read
the ML.
thoughts (or volunteers) ?
rgds
jan i.
e problem could be
that you have old keys on people.
This would normally give you a key invalid error. Since you get the note it
seems key is rejected and it therefore falls back to the password, which is
blocked.
Fastest solution for you is to jump on hip chat with infra, they have the
karma to e.
o generate the keys with puttygen, you also have to
remember to
configure the terminal program to use SSH (not telnet) and give a path to
your part of the key.
- What exactly happens ? is your key rejected or do you get som
release manager does and what
individual committers does.
I think Michael is doing a very important job with preparing builds for the
upcomming release, his work is known here, so much more reason to be
carefull when naming intermidiate builds. Andrea wrote it more direct, this
is a
On Friday, August 7, 2015, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> jan i wrote:
>
>> Is this coordinated with the release manager for 4.1.2 ?
>>
>
> No. It doesn't need to be. Maybe some confusion arose because Michal wrote
> "4.1.2 Early Preview" here and somebody
ned that a version is
made public, before the PMC have even spoken about being ready to make a
release candidate or started voting on a release candidate.
Is this coordinated with the release manager for 4.1.2 ?
Please do not misunderstand me, I think it is great that work is being
done, I am ju
Hi.
Welcome to Manik Malhotra who just accepting being openoffice committer.
rgds
jan i.
, but
others might have different ideas about how to do it. First step would be
to agree on what should be signed (only the setup exe, the runtime exe, the
runtime dll and jars). A good digital signing (like my proposal) contain it
all.
rgds
jan i
>
&
solution no
later than the september board meeting.
An alternative (not my preference) could be to start the vote now until
e.g. september 15th, in the understanding that if a second (or more)
candidate turns up, the vote is restarted.
rgds
jan i.
On 4 August 2015 at 01:36, Kay Schenk wrote:
> [
ember the original date was 16 August, so there might be
candidates out there waiting (just like Dennis was not nominated the first
day).
In case the PMC decides to close for more candidates, I suggest a 72 hour
(+weekend if needed) lazy consensus, and then I can make the needed
resolution to
On 1 August 2015 at 19:23, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> jan i wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, August 1, 2015, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>>> Well, the project does have funds to spend on events and they have to be
>>> spent, so funding is only a matter of a discussion/
teresting event, especially as I am preparing an
> ApacheCon talk somewhat related to this; but it overlaps with another event
> and I won't be able to attend.
>
> I trust Roberto will continue to participate on the calls
>>
>
> I haven't unders
related material it is possible.
rgds
jan i.
On 31 July 2015 at 07:02, Dr. Michael Stehmann <
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> T-DOSE is a free and yearly event held in The Netherlands to promote use
> and development of Free Software. This years event will b
lebration.)
board meeting is later, september 5th is my deadline for personal reasons.
Rgds
jan i
>
> - Dennis
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org ]
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 03:39
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUS
consensus I willchabfe it imidiatly.
rgds
jan i
On Thursday, July 30, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> This is not a nomination statement. It is a comment and a procedural
> suggestion.
>
> COMMENT
>
> Jan,
>
> I am certain that you gave deep consideration to your decis
vote, will depend on the number of candidates but is
basically
a majority vote, with PMC votes being binding.
rgds
jan i.
We welcome Gavin Mcdonald as a new committer.
Gavin, it would be nice if you could write a few lines about yourself.
on behalf of the openoffice PMC
jan i.
SDK (June
> 2010)" --disable-atl --with-package-format="installed msi" --enable-win
> -x64-shellext --with-lang="sk" --without-stlport --without-junit -
> -disable-odk --with-mfc-include-dir="C:/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/inc/mfc42"
> --
dea what you would do on a dedicated vm. The
buildbots can be reconfigured in a single file. You basically just need to
update the configure statement, I do
not know where we store the release config, I have asked that question in
here several times.
Digital signing, can be done from any machine (
Isn´t it about time we got it configured with the AOO stuff.
Once we have that configured, then the buildbots cover our releases, and we
need no longer depend on local machines.
rgds
jan i.
On 22 July 2015 at 18:38, wrote:
> The Buildbot working for 'ASF Buildbot'
> has
Hi.
I have just received this, do we want to participate ?
I have participated earlier with mixed results.
rgds
jan I.
-- Forwarded message --
From: D. Kevin McGrath
Date: 22 July 2015 at 18:10
Subject: Time to propose a CS Capstone Project!
To: j...@apache.org
Colleagues
gt;
If we have updates, we should include them, is there any reason not to ?
rgds
jan i.
>
> Kind regards
>
>
> - ---
> Mechtilde Stehmann
> ## Apache OpenOffice.org
> ## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
> ## Loook, calender-exchange-provider, libreo
e/AOO410/rat-output.html
>
> And yes we have a clean RAT pass! (as expected I guess, but nice to know.)
>
thanks a lot, and you are right believing is one thing, knowing is far
better.
rgds
jan i.
>
> This RAT report will run and update on every commit to that branch.
>
> I ha
lization issues may appear)
>
> Everything looks fine to me. We usually don't want to change the interface
> in a x.y.2 release, but here all strings and options remain exactly the
> same, they are just moved around for better visibility at some resolutions.
>
> Shall
be reported and
> nominated. I'll wait for a RAT output that we can all see and agree upon
> before commenting in the issue.
>
I am lost in all these branches and tags, but I have one position, we run
rat scan on the release candidate and any problems is the same as a no-go
for releas
On 17 July 2015 at 15:23, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> jan i schrieb:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Can someone please help me understand the implications of this:
>>
>> https://blog.documentfoundation.org/2015/07/17/open-document-format-odf-1-2-published-as-
se not to be released)
- It is simple to switch the SVN pointer from trunk to branch, and then we
should have all platforms covered.
- we can save a lengthy upload, because the buildbot generate exe on apache
disks.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
> ---
implications ?
I thought ODF 1.2 was relative old, but I might be wrong.
thanks for any information.
rgds
jan i.
I am not sure how the procedure works, but we need to secure that the
rat-scan patches (gavin) are in 4.1.2
In my opinion, we also need to run a rat-scan on the final release
candidate.
how do we remember this?
rgds
jan i
On Wednesday, July 15, 2015, Marcus wrote:
> Am 07/15/2015 07:29
write the next board report.
rgds
jan I.
>
> This includes:
>
> Issue 125519
> CRASH when step through document from page to page
> Affects mainly Draw. Fixes a crash.
> Discussed by Regina and Armin, fixed by Armin on trunk October 2014, now
> copied by Armin to the Ope
one of the others get a couple of spare cycles they
will commit the patch.
Thanks for taking time to make the correction.
rgds
jan i.
On 14 July 2015 at 12:34, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> Just bumping this, anyone want to apply it?
>
> Thanks
>
> Gav…
>
> > On 11 Jul 2015, at
g forward.
Do you have more recent information ?
rgds
jan i.
>
> Gav…
>
> > On 13 Jul 2015, at 9:04 am, jan i wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I agree to use this as the overall plan, which of course needs to
> detailed.
> >
> > I do have a co
, otherwise we might whitelist
a
DLL with known security issues. This process is something we should do
ahead of every release, and is not as such part of the digital signing, but
digital
signing makes it much more important.
rgds
jan I.
On Sunday, July 12, 2015, Marcus wrote:
> Am 07/12/2015 03:57
On Thursday, July 9, 2015, jan i > wrote:
> Heh
>
> you noted it yourself, wrong list.
>
> In my opinion we should change branch, I dont like reusing 410 because if
> we want to make a 4101 (security issues) it will be close
> to impossible.
>
> rgds
> jan i.
&
Heh
you noted it yourself, wrong list.
In my opinion we should change branch, I dont like reusing 410 because if
we want to make a 4101 (security issues) it will be close
to impossible.
rgds
jan i.
On 9 July 2015 at 21:47, Kay Schenk wrote:
> It seems we are still using the 410 branch
tml#release_manager
>
> Shall we start a [VOTE]? Shall we need further discussion? Shall we simply
> go forward? Up to you.
I dont think we need a vote, we have consensus, nobody said anything
against you volunteering
On Wednesday, July 1, 2015, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> jan i wrote:
>
>> Deadline was last midnight, as said in several mails, but as usual the
>> apacheCON team accept late entries to a degree.
>>
>
> OK, thanks for being flexible.
>
> Nobody from OpenOffic
ails, but as usual the
apacheCON team accept late entries to a degree.
Nobody from OpenOffice stepped up to build a track, or to help review, so
there are no OpenOffice track planned. That said, I do hope (and are pretty
sure) the
reviewers will point at some AOO talks so we will be repr
On 30 June 2015 at 17:44, Marcus wrote:
> Am 06/30/2015 01:51 PM, schrieb jan i:
>
>> It is again time to make a board report, you can find my proposal at
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2015+July
>>
>> comments and changes are welc
On 30 June 2015 at 14:45, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:38 PM, jan i wrote:
>
> > On 30 June 2015 at 13:54, Simon Phipps wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:51 PM, jan i wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi.
> > > >
>
On 30 June 2015 at 13:54, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:51 PM, jan i wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > It is again time to make a board report, you can find my proposal at
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/2015+July
> >
changes sunday 5th july.
rgds
jan i.
fice.org/en/project/languagetool
>
> Perhaps this should be linked also to the sadebar on the download page?
>
I would be a bit careful with that, if done (and I am not against it being
done) it must be 100%
clear that this is not coming from apache, and not part of our release
sch
etail that further.
You also use the word "narrowness", as if these exceptions are written in
stone, that is not the case, we can always ask for other exceptions if
needed (whether
we get them is a different matter).
rgds
jan i.
> [ ... ]
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
the csv file you see there (?0 but I don't know where THAT comes
> from.
>
> This was a nice feature but we need instructions.
I don't think Rob has abandoned the ship, just busy doing other thing.
rob@ would be nice if you could add a little explanation.
rgds
jan i
>
>
and cross-pollination at organized events is also opportune.
>
This of course signals that the other part is interested in a "partial"
cooperation.
>
> 5. The prospect for some sort of federation around the openoffice.org
> code base and perhaps interoperable/reference ODF impl
ender hidden:
> bugzi...@apache.org
>
> But all other email addresses are free readable.
>
> Do you think it is OK?
>
I do. We believe in being totally open, that includes mailing addresses. If
you do not want your mail addr
On 24 June 2015 at 18:28, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache)
wrote:
>
>
> On 24.06.2015 11:01, jan i wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 24, 2015, Michal Hriň wrote:
> >
> ... cut
>
> >>
> >> What about ACEU hackaton ? :)
> > rooms are available,
; What about ACEU hackaton ? :)
rooms are available, so it is a simple matter of getting people to come.
Nobody has volunteered to make a openoffice track, and looking at cfp, it
seems we
might end up without any aoo talks.
rgds
jan i
>
> --
nsidering digital signing). Still, a
> "limited" Release Manager like I could be is probably better than nothing
> if we want to make 4.1.2 a reality.
+1.
With ACEU around the corner I do not have spare cycles before end of
october.
rgds
jan i
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
&
Hi.
Newest rat report still shows the same 6 files as being a problem.
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html
rgds
jan i.
On 18 June 2015 at 20:19, jan i wrote:
> Thanks for applying the patch.
>
> I will check the next RAT-Scan to see if the files sill appear.
Thanks for applying the patch.
I will check the next RAT-Scan to see if the files sill appear.
rgds
jan I.
On 18 June 2015 at 19:36, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> jan i schrieb:
>
>> HI.
>>
>> did anybody note the rat-scan output, seems we have 6 files
/JavaPartManager/.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs
/home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly-rat/build/main/ooxml/source/framework/OOXMLViewer/.classpath
/home/buildslave19/slave19/openofficeorg-nightly-rat/build/main/ooxml/source/framework/OOXMLViewer/.project
rgds
jan i.
On 16 June 2015
t the proper
ALv2 license.
Furthermore we cannot make a release with these files.
I recommend applying the patch. Deleting the files might have sideeffects.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Kind regards
> Regina
>
> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
>
> On 06/05/15 14:45, jan i wrote:
>>
>
e ones are nice,
> but I find they are difficult to put one.
>
> The design need not change, but it would be good to have bigger ones. Is
> that easy to accomplish?
It is a good idea and we have the budget to make it happen. All we need is
someone doing it.
rgds
jan i
>
> - De
Hi
Juergen Schmidt was the release manager for the latest AOO releases so the
key is valid.
If you use our official mirror through www.openoffice.org you should see
that the
key is legal.
but thanks for being observant and reporting your findings.
rgds
jan i
v.p. apache openoffice
On
hi Gav.
Super job, thanks a lot !
rgds
jan i.
On 3 June 2015 at 17:28, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> After going through all the builds we are now in a much healthier position.
>
> See: http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
>
> Only ONE failing build as
On 3 June 2015 at 16:00, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> Hi jan, *
>
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 09:09:30AM +0200, jan i wrote:
> > Looking at other threads, it seems our Mac buildbots are in the process
> of
> > being
> > configured, does anybody have a planned ETA
tructions for a build.
>
> Use the slave name ‘aoo_mac-mini’ when configuring the Buildbot Build.
>
> I have NOT installed any dependent software that the build(s) may require,
> Andrew and Ariel currently have SSH access to the box. Let me know if
> more are needed.
thanks
On Tuesday, June 2, 2015, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 06/01/2015 12:09 AM, jan i wrote:
> > On 31 May 2015 at 18:43, Kay Schenk >
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 05/30/2015 05:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> >>> On 30/05/2015 Ka
g at other threads, it seems our Mac buildbots are in the process of
being
configured, does anybody have a planned ETA ?
Who can/will look at the windows buildbot, it seems svn is not working ?
We also need to reconfigure all buildbots to run with release config.
I am quite busy with a couple of
On 29 May 2015 at 00:57, Kay Schenk wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/15/2014 03:47 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:31:54PM +0100, jan i wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >&
Hi.
I have had the chance of testing your tool earlier, and I see it as a handy
tool.
With my AOO hat on, I do not think it fits in the project. I do think it is
a nice add-on for odf toolkit (which I am not involved in)
and Corinthia.
I will respond further on the corinthia dev list.
rgds
jan
, I do NOT like unconsolidated emails.
I have copied dev@o.a.o so the community can judge your email.
rgds
jan I.
On 18 May 2015 at 16:24, Dakshesh Vyas wrote:
> Hello jani,
>
> Thank you for using Coverity Scan.
> With more than 4000 open source projects now registered at Coverit
OpenOffice. This should be of interest to many
> of our users/
>
+1 go for publish.
rgds
jan I.
>
> -Rob
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
that some files were not
correctly updated (something to do
with the filesystem, if I remember right).
In my opinion "svn up" should do just fine now (I use it on ubuntu and
windows without problems).
rgds
jan I.
> All the other builds also still use mode=copy but I haven’t spotted a
> failing pattern with
> those so far because of it.
>
> HTH
>
> Gav…
>
>
es.
However there is an important point which you might have missed. OpenSource
is a world of doers, we are not told what to do (like in companies), so if
you really want to change things you need to involve yourself.
In your case you could e.g.
- write specific design changes as bugzilla
On Thursday, May 7, 2015, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> jan i wrote:
>
>> do you happen to have the config options we use for releases on the
>> different platforms?
>>
>
> I think the closest resource we have is
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/
t without too much effort.
kay@ do you happen to have the config options we use for releases on the
different platforms?
Changing the builddbots to use our release configuration, will help with
the other problems gav sees (I think). More importantly doong sowould mean
we could use the binaries in our r
On Thursday, May 7, 2015, Kay Schenk wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On 05/06/2015 06:51 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Last build for this was way back in October last year:
> >
> > http://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-snapshot/builds
" later.
The archives however is covered by the general LICENSE file, when we make a
distribution.
Patches are welcome.
rgds
jan I.
>
> HTH
>
> Gav…
>
>
>
>
> i.e. - Im on this list for dev stuff only.
>
It is nice to have you here.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Gav...
>
>
er time’ so although my infra karma will help
> I’m not wearing that hat.
>
Thanks a lot for helping out, I actually think your buildbot experience is
more important than your infra hat for this.
rgds
jan I.
>
> Gav…
>
>
Hi.
I could not see any problems, can someone please check if there are
problems in e.g. a single Forum
thanks in advance
jan i.
On 6 May 2015 at 09:56, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Wed, 6 May 2015 09:36:12 +0200
> Carlo Salvagno wrote:
>
> > He, today there is a new pro
w.
>
> 3) We simply drop the mailing list and we continue using the Gmail address.
+1
rgds
jan i
>
> The list is configured to let all messages through, so moderators of the
> list merely manage subscribers.
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
> ---
t reduce the likelihood of it being used in an exploit. Maybe I am
> missing some of the context from the private security list?
>
It seems to be an extremely seldom used feature, that makes the exploit
unlikely.
I am with Andrea, stopping downloads would not be right in this case.
rgds
jan I.
>
> Thanks,
>
> S.
>
exploiting possibilities to fast forward our source code, but this a
not a short term action.
rgds
jan i.
Version 4.1.1 has been out for a while, so updating to that will help you
with a lot a of the issues.
rgds
jan i
On 26 April 2015 at 16:28, Keith Stephens wrote:
> When is version 4.1.2 due out? I received your warning letter dated April
> 25/15. I presently have version 3.1.1 and was
ustin, and it is my hope that
some of it turn into realities.
rgds
jan I.
> --
> Rory O'Farrell
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
> Hm. I think the issue below is serious. And one we can address. But do
> others think that way or believe otherwise?
Not sure how we can really address this, considering our challenges making
a new desktop release.
Rgds
jan i
>
).
rgds
jan I.
rections) for 4.1.2.
We do not have a lot of development patches for 4.1.2, so let us at least
release languages that are ready.
Of course this is only my opinion.
rgds
jan i.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs
>>>>
> >>> EuroOffice for Android is based on Calligra code.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks. Well, then it's clearly not an OpenOffice derivative and my
> > question of whether to list it (the Android one, I mean) does not hold
> any
> > longe
qualify for a release. The help did not need to be.
> Is this still correct?
yes this is still the policy.
rgds
jan i
>
> Regards
> Keith
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apa
pages. Was this removed and I didn't notice?
>
> If some alternate means of account registration is used, shouldn't this
> be mentioned on the main page?
+1 The cwiki is a 2 step, The user creates an account, then the admin
whitelist it.
we used to have a page in wiki.o.a.o
gt;
We do not have a special key, for that purpose.
Congratulations in making a plugin that make the front page, job well done !
rgds
jan i.
>
> Thanks,
> Carl
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
tivities. A double post
> English/Chinese (two texts in one post) is of course OK if this is more
> suitable in this case.
>
the BoF is mentioned in the board report, but if other projects was present
I would like to mention that ?
rgds
jan i
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
&g
On 6 April 2015 at 21:56, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 06/04/2015 jan i wrote:
>
>> I have just been made aware, that my understanding of chair role was
>> wrong.
>> The Chair has the responsibility to make the board report:
>>
>
> That is a technicality not w
e report.
thanks in advance, and sorry for the confusion.
jan I.
1 - 100 of 498 matches
Mail list logo
