Am 08/29/2016 01:07 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 01/08/2015 03:36 PM, V Stuart Foote wrote:
I've added a background color and icon. The text was also
It certainly won't be missed now...
No, it won't. It seems using a 32-bit Java on a 64-bit Windows
environment continues to be a source of
nal Message-
> From: Kay Schenk [mailto:ksch...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2016 16:07
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Java 32 Redux
>
>
>
> On 01/08/2015 03:36 PM, V Stuart Foote wrote:
> >> I've added a background color and icon. Th
On 01/08/2015 03:36 PM, V Stuart Foote wrote:
>> I've added a background color and icon. The text was also
>
> It certainly won't be missed now...
>
>
>
>
>
No, it won't. It seems using a 32-bit Java on a 64-bit Windows
environment continues to be a source of frustration for end users.
think you're right about this.
- Dennis
-Original Message- From: Dennis E. Hamilton
[mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015
10:39 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: Explaining Java (was
RE: Java 32)
I've started working over the six Java-specific
On 22/01/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
On 01/22/2015 09:42 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
1. What happened with regard to the improvements with regard to the
version of HSQLDB used?
We're still using the base of hsqldb 1.8 with patches for use with
java 7.
See:
[mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 10:39
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: Explaining Java (was RE: Java 32)
I've started working over the six Java-specific messages that are produced by
AOO and adjusting the localizable explanation at
http://openoffice.org
, December 30, 2014 07:28
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Explaining Java (was RE: Java 32)
Am 12/30/2014 03:54 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
[ ... ]
orcmid
I thought the idea was to create openoffice.org/java/index.htm and
seed the xx structure from that. Have I
I've added a background color and icon. The text was also
It certainly won't be missed now...
--
View this message in context:
http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/Java-32-Redux-tp4670709p4670758.html
Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Am 01/07/2015 06:29 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
The page at
http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/java.html
covers the Java problem nicely. As most of the Java problems originate with
Windows users, many of whom are lesser skilled in computers, might I ask for
the Windows section to be
The page at
http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/java.html
covers the Java problem nicely. As most of the Java problems originate with
Windows users, many of whom are lesser skilled in computers, might I ask for
the Windows section to be repeated with more emphasis - perhaps boxed and
Am 12/29/2014 10:30 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 28/12/2014 Marcus wrote:
Am 12/27/2014 12:44 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
In xx we try to avoid too many subdirectories. The Java file could
find a place in the product directory, and be referenced from the
leftnav in that directory (extended
[fuzzy-headed with the flu]
-- replying below to --
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 03:35
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Explaining Java (was RE: Java 32)
Am 12/29/2014 10:30 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 28/12/2014 Marcus wrote:
Am
Am 12/30/2014 03:54 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
[fuzzy-headed with the flu]
-- replying below to --
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 03:35
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Explaining Java (was RE: Java 32)
Am 12/29/2014 10:30 AM
On 28/12/2014 Marcus wrote:
Am 12/27/2014 12:44 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
In xx we try to avoid too many subdirectories. The Java file could
find a place in the product directory, and be referenced from the
leftnav in that directory (extended a few hours ago).
in general, I would agree with
Am 12/27/2014 12:44 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 25/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
A. Is this a potential way to do it?
1. Create an ooo-site/trunk/content/xx/java/ directory.
2. Create leftnav.mdtext and index.mdtext files there.
3. The content/xx/java/index.mdtext would become the
+1
-- replying below to --
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2014 10:06
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Explaining Java (was RE: Java 32)
Am 12/27/2014 12:44 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 25/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote
Am 12/28/2014 07:38 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
+1
-- replying below to --
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2014 10:06
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Explaining Java (was RE: Java 32)
Am 12/27/2014 12:44 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 25
-- reply below to --
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2014 11:13
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Explaining Java (was RE: Java 32)
Am 12/28/2014 07:38 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
[ ... ]
I am a bit wary of live links in dialog boxes
On 27/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
How about this? Create an ooo-site/trunk/content/java/ *folder*
where the index.htm will be the new version of the target file.
This can be done in advance because and, after the text is
considered OK, internationalization could proceed
with the new messages and the new site pages.
How am I doing?
sounds good. To have this ready for a 4.1.2 sounds also be feasible.
Marcus
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 00:12
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java
On 25/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
A. Is this a potential way to do it?
1. Create an ooo-site/trunk/content/xx/java/ directory.
2. Create leftnav.mdtext and index.mdtext files there.
3. The content/xx/java/index.mdtext would become the English Language version
that
We adopt for
-- replying to this below --
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2014 15:44
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Explaining Java (was RE: Java 32)
On 25/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
A. Is this a potential way to do it?
1. Create an ooo
Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 00:12
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 32
On 22/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I am assuming that we can do the job with a single text. So I
see no problem with where it is kept.
One
?
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 00:12
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 32
On 22/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I am assuming that we can do the job with a single text. So I
see no problem
On 22/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I am assuming that we can do the job with a single text. So I
see no problem with where it is kept.
One consideration might be the maintenance of the different-language
versions and how browsers are routed to the correct one.
The
+1 !!
-- in reply to --
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 00:12
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 32
On 22/12/2014 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I am assuming that we can do the job with a single text. So I
see no problem
Marcus wrote:
Sounds like a good solution in general. But I don't know how to
integrate a variable URL into the error message for the dialogbox.
You needn't do that.
It must be something like the follwong:
http://www.openoffice.org/; + $ISO_CODE + java.html
No, in the ENGLISH string you
-- in reply to --
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 09:55
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 32
Am 12/22/2014 05:13 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
+1 !!
Sounds like a good solution in general. But I don't know how to
integrate a variable
+1 Looks like a workable case, especially if translators know what to do.
-- and reply to ---
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 13:41
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 32
[ ... ] in the ENGLISH string you write the link as
http
On 11/12/2014 Andreas Säger wrote:
Am 11.12.2014 um 09:49 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
My suggestion (can be executed as a team, not necessarily by one person):
1. Find a proper wording for
http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/java.html
More detailed info is needed to overthrow the common
Am 12/21/2014 11:06 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 11/12/2014 Andreas Säger wrote:
Am 11.12.2014 um 09:49 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
My suggestion (can be executed as a team, not necessarily by one
person):
1. Find a proper wording for
http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/java.html
More
-- in reply to --
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 15:32
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 32
Am 12/21/2014 11:06 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
[ ... ]
2. Create a link www.openoffice.org/java pointing at it
when thinking a bit, I would
@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 32
Am 12/10/2014 08:22 AM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
Here is the message as quoted on the en-Forum
JRE is Defective
No Java installation could be found
Please check your installation
thanks for your help.
I think I've found the locations in the code
On 11/12/14 11:13, Andreas Säger wrote:
A Java runtime environment (JRE) is required to use the following
functionality:
*Wizards*, namely:
*Macros*
*Extensions*
Finding keywords in the F1 help depends on Java.
*Database access*
Doesn't a11y functionality/capability
://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/Java-32-tp4669997p4670245.html
Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
On 19/12/14 23:45, V Stuart Foote wrote:
Doesn't a11y functionality/capability require Java?
Not since early in the 4.1 release cycle with implementation of IAccessible2
based native bridge for Windows,
Thanks.
That sort of explains a bizarre call had with GW Micro.
jonathon
it's fine.
Marcus
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 00:49
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 32
[ ... ]
My suggestion (can be executed as a team, not necessarily by one
person):
1. Find a proper
accurate) first.
OK, then first a developer has to sort this out before we can go on.
For me it's fine.
Marcus
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 00:49
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 32
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 00:49
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 32
[ ... ]
My suggestion (can be executed as a team, not necessarily by one
person):
1. Find a proper wording for
http
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 32
[ ... ]
My suggestion (can be executed as a team, not necessarily by one person):
1. Find a proper wording for
http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/java.html
The crux of this problem is that Windows AOO is 32 bit and therefore
, December 11, 2014 00:49
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 32
[ ... ]
My suggestion (can be executed as a team, not necessarily by one person):
1. Find a proper wording for
http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/java.html
The crux of this problem is that Windows AOO is 32 bit
Marcus wrote:
Of course I can change it in the code with a commit. However, I'm not
able to create a build to check myself to see if my fix is good or
produces an ugly build breaker. I'm not yet so far to build AOO from
scratch myself. I wanted to try this for the quite days at this years end.
Am 11.12.2014 um 09:49 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
Of course I can change it in the code with a commit. However, I'm not
able to create a build to check myself to see if my fix is good or
produces an ugly build breaker. I'm not yet so far to build AOO from
scratch myself. I wanted
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 00:49
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 32
[ ... ]
My suggestion (can be executed as a team, not necessarily by one person):
1. Find a proper wording for
http
, and definitely accurate)
first.
OK, then first a developer has to sort this out before we can go on.
For me it's fine.
Marcus
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 00:49
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 32
On 10/12/14 08:22, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 23:01:01 +
Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On 9 December 2014 22:19:41 GMT+00:00, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 12/09/2014 11:10 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
Am 12/09/2014 06:23 PM, schrieb Rory
O'Farrell [mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie]
Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 23:22
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 32
[ ... ]
Here is the message as quoted on the en-Forum
JRE is Defective
No Java installation could be found
Please check your installation
Am 12/10/2014 08:22 AM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 23:01:01 +
Rory O'Farrellofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On 9 December 2014 22:19:41 GMT+00:00, Marcusmarcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 12/09/2014 11:10 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
Am 12/09/2014 06:23 PM, schrieb
: Rory O'Farrell
[mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie] Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 23:22 To:
dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Java 32
[ ... ]
Here is the message as quoted on the en-Forum
JRE is Defective No Java installation could be found Please check
your installation
, 2014 14:49
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 32
Am 12/10/2014 11:08 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 12/10/2014 08:52 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
[ ... ]
Since the message is limited in length and must translate easily, it
seems something like
A 32-bit Java Runtime (JRE) is needed
, 2014 14:49
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Java 32
Am 12/10/2014 11:08 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 12/10/2014 08:52 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
[ ... ]
Since the message is limited in length and must translate easily, it
seems something like
A 32-bit Java Runtime (JRE
If we are working towards a new release, could the Java not found message
from Windows be extended to be more informative? It could be amended to say
something like OpenOffice needs a 32 bit Java, which has not been found on
this machine.
Many Windows users know they have Java installed and
Am 12/09/2014 06:23 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
If we are working towards a new release, could the Java not found
message from Windows be extended to be more informative? It could be
amended to say something like OpenOffice needs a 32 bit Java, which
has not been found on this machine.
Marcus wrote:
Am 12/09/2014 06:23 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
If we are working towards a new release, could the Java not found
message from Windows be extended to be more informative? It could be
amended to say something like OpenOffice needs a 32 bit Java, which
has not been found on
Am 12/09/2014 11:10 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
Am 12/09/2014 06:23 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
If we are working towards a new release, could the Java not found
message from Windows be extended to be more informative? It could be
amended to say something like OpenOffice
On 9 December 2014 22:19:41 GMT+00:00, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 12/09/2014 11:10 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
Am 12/09/2014 06:23 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
If we are working towards a new release, could the Java not found
message from Windows be extended to be
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 23:01:01 +
Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote:
On 9 December 2014 22:19:41 GMT+00:00, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 12/09/2014 11:10 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus wrote:
Am 12/09/2014 06:23 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
If we are working towards a
57 matches
Mail list logo
