-- Forwarded message --
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have only 30 seconds to read this;
Join us in celebrating the ASF's 10th Anniversary at ApacheCon!
The Call for Papers is now open for ApacheCon US 2009, taking place 2-6
November in Oakland,
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Kito Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's fine, but I don't really see _anyone_ driving releases :-). What's
the problem with letting Shale Test move somewhere else?
The problem,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where's the best place to manage the site? I noticed that the site
source in the trunk is different from that in the 1_0_X branch. I was
trying to get the site ready to deploy now that 1.0.5 is finished and
before I make an
On 6/2/08, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A set of artifacts for Shale 1.0.5 is now ready. Please review the
artifacts mentioned below and vote accordingly. Since this is my first
time as release manager I wouldn't be surprised if something is
missing or if I've included things that
On 6/4/08, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1 The copyright date in the notice file is 2007 instead of 2008
Aside from the copyright date, noted above, I only verified that
notice.txt,
manifest.mf and
On 6/5/08, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) The *test* artifacts aren't meant to be distributed via releases,
or used for anything beyond local testing, IIRC. (the usecases apps
are meant to demo features). I
On 5/12/08, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the formal vote for the new Shale master POM version 3. The
former vote for the same version was cancelled due to problems in the
POM. The POM was corrected and the release process was re-executed
since the previous release had not
On 5/12/08, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Shale Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by GregReddin:
http://wiki.apache.org/shale/ReleasePlan105
On 5/12/08, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its sometimes tedious to figure out why certain things are not
happening in the m2 build, but I think it'll be worthwhile spending
some time trying to fix
On 5/2/08, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg,
Thank you for the update.
For clarification, what are you artifacts are you planning on releasing in
the near future.
We are going to try to do a 1.0.5
On 4/18/08, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to cancel this vote and go ahead and implement the
changes outlined by Rahul that will keep the site from redeploying
when the master-pom is released. You can track progress in SHALE-487:
On 4/18/08, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
None, thanks for doing this. If the master pom v3 hasn't been sync'ed
to central, I don't mind doing a take 2 on it (otherwise we can move
on to v4).
I
Could you please open separate tickets for each item, along with any
patches you'd like to propose, in the Shale JIRA [1] (Validator
component) ?
Unless someone looks at this immediately, that will better ensure that
these stay on some roadmap.
-Rahul
[1]
On 4/15/08, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:19 AM, linux.eavilesa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where is shale web page?
Oops. Looks like someone deployed the site from the master POM. Can
the guilty party please re-publish the website? :)
snip/
Since
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the formal vote for the new Shale master POM version 3.
I would appreciate a thorough review of these artifacts since I am a
release manager newbie :-)
You can find the signed release candidate at [1].
Please
On 3/24/08, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone doublecheck these two wiki pages and let me know if they
are out of date? Will I be ok using these as a guide? I noticed there
is no release plan page for 1.0.4. Was that intentional and/or should
I create one for 1.0.5?
snip/
On 3/24/08, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip/
I'd like to volunteer to be the RM for a 1.0.5 release
if everybody else is on board. I'm not a fast-mover and I'm not sure
what my schedule will be but I would like to do it so I can understand
On 3/20/08, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/3/20, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In its meeting yesterday the Apache Board of Directors unanimously
approved a resolution naming Gary VanMatre the new chair of the Apache
Shale Project Management Committee. Please join us
On 1/15/08, Ryan Wynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 11:33 AM, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 8:59 AM, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all (and in particular Gary VanMatre).
Now that Shale is being dismantled, I think that Clay could live as
On 12/6/07, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
as discussed already (here/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) there will be a move of
Shale (or some parts of it),
into MyFaces.
But, before a thing like that will happen, we should release
1.0.5
On 12/8/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 8, 2007 6:40 PM, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking at the 1.0.x branch, trying to get everything into a
single distribution so that it's easy to release.
Or not. I didn't realize how many example apps we have! I put
On 10/21/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
big-snip/
* Dialog Manager
* Dialog Manager (Basic Implementation)
* Dialog Manager (SCXML Implementation)
The Dialog Manager might be a next step for MyFaces Orchestra. Anyway,
I
hope that one of the original
On 8/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: hermod
Date: Sun Aug 5 04:10:42 2007
New Revision: 562848
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=562848
Log: (empty)
snip/
Please add a brief log message with a JIRA pointer, where possible. If
you want, you can propedit
On 7/24/07, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Thanks for talking a look Rahul. We also have an issue with the parent pom
from the plugin pom. I created the folder structure base on the pde maven
plugin doc. The extra plugins folder hides the parent pom. Do you know
if there is
On 7/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gvanmatre
Date: Mon Jul 23 10:51:09 2007
New Revision: 558812
snip/
Added:
shale/sandbox/shale-eclipse-plugins/
shale/sandbox/shale-eclipse-plugins/plugins/
On 6/22/07, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/22/07, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 6/22/07, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
hi,
are there any plans for 1.1.0 release ?
As an aside, IMO its worthwhile to have a v1.0.5 as well so we can
On 6/13/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul,
Many many thanks for taking these on ... I work remotely so I can
generally skim email during long meetings (don't tell my boss :-), but
it's difficult to do substantitve stuff.
snip/
This one was hardly any work, you may be
On 3/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: hermod
Date: Wed Mar 14 04:43:53 2007
New Revision: 518103
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=518103
Log:
Added fix for SHALE-424. ComponentConfigBean now checks it the config file is
empty before trying to create a URL
On 3/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: hermod
Date: Tue Mar 13 06:25:08 2007
New Revision: 517688
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=517688
Log:
Added mising Tag handlers for validators and converters, and also updated the
ignore list
snip/
First of all,
Please post usage questions to the user list, its this forum on nabble:
http://www.nabble.com/Shale---User-f15689.html
A quick answer below:
On 3/9/07, Pich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering if there is anybody who has managed to start A DialogContext
Via URL Parameters, as
On 2/27/07, Hermod Opstvedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Now that there are a couple of tutorials on the Wiki (and more to come)
covering Shale and Clay and that is sparked off by the Maven Shale/Clay
starter archetype, I'd like to call for a vote to promote it so that it gets
into the distro.
On 2/24/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
what do you guys think to change the method to return null, incase of
there is no dialog with the desired name ?
snip/
Change isn't source compatible, so hard to justify, I think.
-Rahul
P.S.- IMO, we should be porting things
I won't be there, no talk for me. I'll be rooting from this side of the pond :-)
Craig -
Were you planning on talking about the dialog impls? It'd be great to
see a larger picture being painted around the SCXML dialog impl beyond
the runtime piece (entire dev cycle impact, same flow but
On 2/2/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/2/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I won't be there, no talk for me. I'll be rooting from this side of the
pond :-)
Craig -
Were you planning on talking about the dialog impls? It'd be great to
see a larger picture being
On 1/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that contains the bug I fixed,
are we providing a 104_1 ?
snip/
Nope, those are the bits we voted on for 1.0.4. I think you are asking
about SHALE-394, that will be available in subsequent releases (next
in 1_0_X line is 1.0.5 ATM).
On 1/23/07, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am pretty fine with a 1.0.5 instead of 1.0.4.1 ;)
Me too :-)
snip/
I definitely understand the desire for the fix to be available (and
released). But I am even more interested in
On 1/12/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
OK, I'll post the proposed text for the announcement early next week
and we can send it out then (by that time the site will have been
updated, artifacts sufficiently mirrored etc.)
snap/
OK, we're all set to announce now
On 1/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gvanmatre
Date: Sun Jan 14 13:01:07 2007
New Revision: 496148
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=496148
Log:
Added the new shale-clay-starter-archetype contributed by Hermod Opstvedt to
the sandbox for review
On 1/5/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/4/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Talking of Amsterdam, anyone else going? Any Shale sessions planned? I
have been thinking about a piece on dialogs (and maybe other things),
but have made no effort towards
On 1/11/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Struts posts a test build for a couple of weeks and then votes on the
release and quality at the same time. If theres alot of change then
the release might get voted initially as apha or beta. Once the
release has been out there a while
On 1/9/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
* Copy the m2 artifacts and the metadata files over to the m2-rsync repo
* Copy the release artifacts (*.zip), readme to the /www/wao/dist space
* Roll version numbers in 1_0_X branch
* Sync up 1_0_X branch and trunk (except the 1.1
This ones thoroughly OT, sorry list.
On 1/11/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/11/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Here is the relevant recent example I mentioned in the last post ( [1]
The quality grade in that initial post is in the title [VOTE] Release
On 1/9/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/9/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/9/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Pending 24 hours for reporting any errors in counting etc., I plan to
complete the release tasks:
* Copy the m2 artifacts
On 1/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: craigmcc
Date: Mon Jan 8 23:13:55 2007
New Revision: 494333
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=494333
Log:
[SHALE-389] Implement a dialogScope pseudo-variable that is equivalent
(in the current implementations) to
On 1/5/07, Gregg Leichtman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Additionally, note that the framework distribution (nightlies or
release) contains all dependency jars in the lib folder
Ok, that is _very_ useful (thanks, I had not noticed this and had been
going out on my own for the past few months to
On 1/9/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Pending 24 hours for reporting any errors in counting etc., I plan to
complete the release tasks:
* Copy the m2 artifacts and the metadata files over to the m2-rsync repo
* Copy the release artifacts (*.zip), readme to the /www/wao/dist
We should probably look into posting 1.0.4 docs online (since the
trunk is going to have an ever-increasing delta). I was thinking of
packaging up the 1.0.4 site and exploding a scp'ed tarball into
/www/sao/1.0.4
Objections? Better way to post the 1.0.4 site?
-Rahul
On 1/5/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/4/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Tempted towards a dev profile for pushing out all reports
(Cobertura, PMD, CPD, Checkstyle and what not) -- so (a) we don't get
caught up in trying to sanitize all the bits
Once more, with a slightly different subject to keep archives and
email clients happy. This is a vote to release Apache Shale version
1.0.4. There are no functional changes since the last vote (delta
addresses Niall's comments). This vote is scheduled to close in 72
hours (Monday 8th late
On 1/4/07, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to Rahul for all the grunt work to pull this release together!
+1 for that sentiment!
Sorry I haven't been much help lately. I'm just getting my business
off the ground these days so I've been tied up with that and some
family stuff.
about what works together.
-= Gregg =-
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 12/29/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, December 28, 2006 4:56 pm
To: commits@shale.apache.org
The above
On 1/5/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
What should also happen here is attribution in the NOTICE.txt file for
shale-tiger module too ... I'll look into the appropriate wording for that
and commit something soon.
snap/
OK, I will be cutting the new artifacts in ~8 hours
On 12/31/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/31/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No pending issues against 1.0.4 snap in JIRA ATM (the couple of open
ones are sufficiently addressed IMO), so pending ~24 hours for any
feedback on the dry run (let me know if you need
The SHALE_1_0_X branch [1] has been created. Over the next day, it
will be used to prepare the proposed v1.0.4 artifacts and svn tag.
My preference would be to have no commits to the branch when releases
are being prepared and voted on (relevant commits to trunk that need
to be backported can
On 1/1/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/1/07, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
More generally, I propose we have the following procedure for future
releases:
(1) At the appropriate time, the RM declares a code freeze on the
relevant branch
(2) Development
On 1/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: craigmcc
Date: Mon Jan 1 14:58:04 2007
New Revision: 491671
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=491671
Log:
Advance trunk version numbers from 1.0.4-SNAPSHOT to 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT now that
1.0 has been branched. SHALE-383
No pending issues against 1.0.4 snap in JIRA ATM (the couple of open
ones are sufficiently addressed IMO), so pending ~24 hours for any
feedback on the dry run (let me know if you need more time), I will
move towards a final set of proposed artifacts (and a vote).
-Rahul
On 12/29/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/29/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
The first thing I notice is that there are no version numbers in the
filenames. I expected to see shale-framework-1.0.4-SNAPSHOT.zip, etc.
I manually removed the version number
On 12/29/06, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm done with changes to the release notes for now (commits@ list
seems to have a lag right now). Please jump in and improve them.
I have left one FIXME for any notable Clay changes that we may want
On 12/29/06, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/29/06, Gary VanMatre wrote:
From: Rahul Akolkar
I'm done with changes to the release notes for now (commits@ list
seems to have a lag right now). Please jump in and improve them.
I
I did a dry run of the release artifacts (dry since its based on trunk
from earlier today, all versions are snaps):
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/shale/v104snap/ (m2 artifacts in repos)
If you get a chance, try inspecting a few artifacts, early feedback
would be great. Planning on using the
On 12/28/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/28/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Apps:
shale-blank-1.0.4.zip
shale-clay-usecases-1.0.4.zip
shale-mailreader-1.0.4.zip
shale-mailreader-jpa-1.0.4.zip
shale-sql-browser-1.0.4.zip
shale-usecases-1.0.4.zip
I'm done with changes to the release notes for now (commits@ list
seems to have a lag right now). Please jump in and improve them.
I have left one FIXME for any notable Clay changes that we may want to
list as was done for 1.0.3 (Gary?), but anything else worth mentioning
should go in section 3
On 12/27/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/27/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The md5 and sha1 checksums are fine. When I try to verify the signature,
though:
gpg --verify shale-master-2.pom.asc shale-master-2.pom
I get the Can't check signature: public
On 12/27/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Yep ... that worked. I got the good signature and untrusted messages.
snap/
OK, so we're good to go on the master pom. Thanks.
I should have mentioned also what Wendy said ... we should follow the best
practice of maintaining
On 12/27/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/27/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: craigmcc
Date: Wed Dec 27 14:33:45 2006
New Revision: 490580
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=490580
Few thoughts:
1) Why is the dependencies section in the parent pom commented out?
Tempted to remove it.
2) We probably want to move designtime into a profile (can wait post 1.0.4).
3) There is some other cruft in the parent and remoting poms that I
intend to remove.
Objections to 1 or 3?
Branching tomorrow. Please speak up now if you want more time.
-Rahul
On 12/27/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/27/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
2) We probably want to move designtime into a profile (can wait post 1.0.4).
It should probably go back into the sandbox at the moment ... it's on my
list to work on in 2007
The permissions for the KEYS file [1] seem botched after being
restored from backup. Guess we'll need to ping #asfinfra ? (I'm never
on it though, anyone? TIA).
-Rahul
[1] http://www.apache.org/dist/shale/KEYS
For thread closure, this has been taken care of (thanks Craig).
-Rahul
On 12/28/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The permissions for the KEYS file [1] seem botched after being
restored from backup. Guess we'll need to ping #asfinfra ? (I'm never
on it though, anyone? TIA).
-Rahul
and participate.
-Rahul
On 12/22/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In preparation for the framework release version 1.0.4, the Shale
Master POM has been updated:
http://tinyurl.com/ymy9ap (diff with v1)
tagged (long URLs below, may get fragmented):
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
On 12/26/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/26/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following a 24 hour buffer for reporting any counting errors, artifact
will be in the m2 rsync repo.
Thanks to those who took time to review and participate.
While I'm thinking of it... I
On 12/26/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Back on track, will sign the pom, and will ask this list to verify it
before copying over. (BTW, is there a way to get m2 to sign?)
snap/
Done, I've added my signature to the master pom v2 in the staging
repo. My key is here [1
On 12/22/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
This is a vote to release the tagged (and deployed) artifact above as version 2.
--8---
[X] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1, because ...
---
snap/
This vote is non-binding.
-Rahul
On 12/21/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/20/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: craigmcc
Date: Wed Dec 20 23:37:50 2006
New Revision: 489275
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=489275
Log:
Document the support for dealing with SHALE-61
On 12/20/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a question: are you keeping good notes as to what you're
doing? I'd like for the details of the process to end up on a wiki
page if they are not already there. After reading these messages I
have no clue what you are doing :-)
snip/
On 12/19/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/19/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
OK, if everyone's fine with that, I will create the 1.0 branch (called
SHALE_1_0_x unless there are better suggestions) when we get closer to
the release (after all 1.0.4-SNAP
On 12/19/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
* I like the habit I've seen Rahul and others do in Commons, of
adding contributor entries for those who have posted
patches. A quick scan of our issues might be useful.
snap/
This becomes hard after the fact. If we decide to
Figure we should get that going while we wrap up on 1.0.4 code,
otherwise a 72 hour buffer (at the least). I'm not aware of any
pending changes ATM, but if you have any, please go ahead.
Some procedural bits, yell if incorrect:
* I can't find the v1 tag (probably somewhere is Struts land, not
On 12/17/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/16/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like reasonable things to do :-) We even have a staging repo
defined in the master pom (thanks Wendy) which we should use for this.
By default if the version doesn't end in -SNAPSHOT
On 12/15/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Re: you guys tag teaming on RM for Shale ... +1! :-). The wiki has a
bunch of notes (mostly from Wendy) that I basically followed last time. A
couple of things to watch out for:
* The shale-master pom should be upversioned and
On 12/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: craigmcc
Date: Fri Dec 15 16:51:06 2006
New Revision: 487741
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=487741
Log:
Refine the dialog framework APIs as a foundation for improving handling of
browser navigation buttons:
*
Before we get to the master pom release:
Can we consider using scpexe:// URLs, or providing some way to do that?
As it stands, scp:// URLs don't work for me when I'm traveling (and
most of Dec. is travel). Background [1].
Before getting to the soution, it would help to get data points from
On 12/16/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/16/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
The subdialog issue doesn't exist in the Commons SCXML impl (its one
machine, rather than a stack of machines at runtime) -- ofcourse, the
downside is that IDs in the parent
On 12/16/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/16/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Indeed, I think a common paradigm will be: do stuff on entry / undo on
exit. In which case, the onExit() from the previous view state and the
onEntry() into the new view state
On 12/16/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/16/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/16/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Indeed, I think a common paradigm will be: do stuff on entry / undo on
exit. In which case, the onExit() from the previous
On 12/13/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My project at work is finally in a place where we really need to use
Shale :-) The 1.0.3 release does not work out of the box for us
because we are using MyFaces 1.1.5 and Shale 1.0.3 depends on MyFaces
1.1.1. Shale 1.0.4-SNAPSHOT does not. So
On 12/15/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
In terms of 1.0.4-SNAP JIRA issues, I will be fixing SHALE-348 this
weekend once I'm done traveling -- that leaves us with SHALE-61. I
dropped the ball on that, and ATM I don't think
On 12/15/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
In terms of 1.0.4-SNAP JIRA issues, I will be fixing SHALE-348 this
weekend once I'm done traveling -- that leaves us with SHALE-61.
... also SHALE-211 [1]. I'm guessing we can close
On 12/4/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/4/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: craigmcc
Date: Mon Dec 4 13:25:07 2006
New Revision: 482364
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=482364
On 12/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: craigmcc
Date: Mon Dec 4 13:25:07 2006
New Revision: 482364
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=482364
Log:
First round of supporting events when DialogContextManager.create() or
DialogContextManager.remove() is called.
On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Aquiring Shale section on the building page points to the Struts
download page (and mentions the struts subversion repository) for
checking out the source:
http://shale.apache.org/building.html
snip/
Thanks, should be fixed [1] by
On 11/19/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(replying to dev, though I think these get picked up in JIRA eventually)
On 11/17/06, Craig McClanahan (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-337?page=all ]
Craig McClanahan resolved SHALE-337
On 11/14/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/13/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
AHA ... just figured out what we are doing differently. The
shale-dialog-basic library registers two resources (embedded in the jar
file) for the 1.0 and 1.1 DTDs of a dialog
On 11/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: craigmcc
Date: Fri Nov 10 20:16:19 2006
New Revision: 473638
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=473638
Log:
Partial fix for cleaning up static resources at application shutdown
(SHALE-274) for the basic implementation.
(replying to dev, though I think these get picked up in JIRA eventually)
On 11/17/06, Craig McClanahan (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-337?page=all ]
Craig McClanahan resolved SHALE-337.
Fix
, please ping the user list (Shale or
Commons, as you find appropriate). Thanks.
-Rahul
[1] http://people.apache.org/builds/shale/nightly/
[2] http://people.apache.org/builds/jakarta-commons/nightly/commons-scxml/
Thanks
Jayant
-Original Message-
From: Rahul Akolkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 11/15/06, THOMAS, JAYANT (SBCSI) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, That is what I want , say for example I might have a bunch of
higher level states from where at certain point I can navigate to child
states defined in another xml like popup.xml, it will be nice If I can
navigate from Wizard
On 11/13/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
AHA ... just figured out what we are doing differently. The
shale-dialog-basic library registers two resources (embedded in the jar
file) for the 1.0 and 1.1 DTDs of a dialog configuration resource. The
shale-dialog-scxml library
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
