Am Samstag 04 April 2009 22:50:11 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Agreed, however we need to be careful as we can be sued for any
code which is copyrighted by somebody else; if we can provide the
would-be litigant with the identity of the committer, we don't have
this problem.
Sure.
That's why so
Am Dienstag 07 April 2009 10:28:30 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
> >> > > git tag -s -m
> > Can you also sign a revision without tagging it?
>
> No.
> In DVCS model, signing single revision does not make sense
> -- since you will merge / rebase that revision as soon as it is merged.
I think it does ma
Am Freitag 10 April 2009 18:30:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > I think it would be nice to do this as repository which can be updated
> > only if at least 60% of a specific group of people agree.
>
> Why is that beneficial relative to a fully distributed model of people
> pulling if they like a pa
Am Dienstag 21 April 2009 17:41:59 schrieb Theodore Hong:
> VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote:
> > Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > If you watch the 'Human body' documentary it says that humans have on
> > average 20 people they call friends. I am unsure where that number comes
> > from, but if it's some scien
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > other member of the group as freenet friends, or should they only have
> > their closest contacts?
>
> I don't know. IMHO 150 is probably too much, have you spoken privately to
> all these people?
I think all people I know privately,
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:57:06 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > But both have the drawback of drawing people away from the webinterface,
>
> which
>
> > increases the maintenance cost for toad.
>
> Not sure I follow.
They'd be another interface and someone would have to keep it up to date and
wo
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:15:07 schrieb VolodyA! V Anarhist:
> > Wouldn't IRC/Jabber break anonymity ?
> >
> > Or, maybe you're speaking of IRC/Jabber over Freenet and i'm wrong ...
>
> It would only let people know that you are running Freenet, not what you
> are doing with it. And whom you are
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:53:39 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> I don't understand why you want to run a jabber server. Surely announcing
> to your jabber contacts that you are interested in ref exchange would be
> sufficient, and would be client level?
I don't mean announcing to your jabber contac
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 18:26:05 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> block [16:39:31] duplicating the top block can be done with SSKs
> very easily [16:39:40] but with CHKs it requires much longer URIs
> [16:39:43] is that a problem?
> [16:40:04] how much longer?
> [16:40:10] CHK@,, -> CHK@ key 1>,,
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 09:25:15 schrieb xor:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: devl-boun...@freenetproject.org
> > [mailto:devl-boun...@freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Arne
> > Babenhauserheide
> > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:14 AM
> > To: dev
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 15:16:40 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Arguably nobody ever types CHKs even now, and copy and paste allows for
> fairly long keys. Thoughts?
You know what I think.
The length of the key doesn't matter to me, because freesites already hide
them in links, and otherwise I
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:53:45 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > I don't know. IMHO 150 is probably too much, have you spoken privately to
> > all these people?
>
> I think all people I know priva
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 22:05:18 schrieb Robert Hailey:
> > "The Freenet software running on your computer" is probably what I
> > would use to describe what "node" means to non-techy users.
> > Couldn't it just use "Your computer is downloading this page from
> > Freenet", that's what people w
Am Dienstag 14 April 2009 12:22:12 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> A workflow where the repository gets updated only from repositories
> whose heads got signed by at least a certain percentage of trusted
> committers.
Could someone comment on this?
It's quite security related, so
Am Montag 27 April 2009 17:11:54 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Dienstag 14 April 2009 12:22:12 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> > A workflow where the repository gets updated only from repositories
> > whose heads got signed by at least a certain percentage of trusted
Am Mittwoch 29 April 2009 12:38:15 schrieb xor:
> We're in 2009 and graphical IDEs ought to be able to do the revision
> control, if that does not work then the wrong revision control system or
> IDE is being used. It is really not like revision control is something
> new, it has to be possible wit
Am Mittwoch 29 April 2009 16:37:25 schrieb bbac...@googlemail.com:
> If you like the command line, ok. But if I can't work with git using
> my prefered IDE,
> then I have a problem. I don't want to change anything just because you
> decided to switch to some SCM that is mostly used by command line
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> 3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
>
> Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online
> games?
Or with other filesharing services (short lived torrents, downloading in
Gnutella) or with graphics editing or vi
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> 5. Use port 80,443,53,1863 for communication. (74 votes)
>
> I have no idea how this got into the top 5! Any ideas? People trying to run
> nodes at work perhaps?
Maybe not wanting the provider to be able to just shut down nonstandard ports
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 19:59:15 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > 3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
> >
> > Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online
> > games?
&
Am Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 00:23:54 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Isn't using a reasonably low scheduling priority enough? And we already do
> that!
Not really, since I can't disable it (when I want full speed), and it sadly
doesn't work really well for memory consumption.
I'd like an option to have
Hi,
I just want to provide some feedback on Infocalypse - I hope this is the right
place, since it's an application on freenet.
I tried it a bit and I really like it.
I didn't yet try inserting a big repo, but it works pretty well for the
smaller repositories I tested (which are also availa
On Monday, 11. May 2009 22:24:48 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > The mirror of freenet staging worked, too.
> >
> > The initial pull took about an hour, and it succeeded, though I got the
> > log output "GetFailed".
> > Most recent revision was 13919
> > user:Daniel Cheng (???)
> > date:
On Tuesday, 12. May 2009 21:36:30 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> We are currently working on Freenet 0.8, which will be released later this
> year, and will include additional performance improvements, usability work,
> and security improvements, as well as the usual debugging. Features are not
> yet fi
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 10:24:52 Daniel Cheng wrote:
> In fms, you can always adjust the MinLocalMessageTrust to get whatever
> message you please to read. -- ya, you may call it censorship..
> but it is the one every reader can opt-out with 2 clicks. --- Even
> if majority abuse the sy
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 15:03:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Perhaps some form of feedback/ultimatum system? Users who are affected by
> spam from an identity can send proof that the identity is a spammer to the
> users they trust who trust that identity. If the proof is valid, those who
> trust t
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 18:12:52 Robert Hailey wrote:
> On May 12, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 12. May 2009 21:36:30 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >> be out in a few days), and hopefully Bloom filter sharing, a new
> >> feature
> >
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 19:00:54 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> We could pause most of the node relatively easily, there will still be some
> background activity, and therefore some garbage collection, but it can be
> kept minimal...
That would be great.
As long as it doesn't access its memory ver
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 16:33:29 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Voting not on users but on messages (objects):
Short additional info: You never rate users directly but only check how much
their votes correspond with yours.
If they correspond positively (they vote up what you vote up)
On Monday, 11. May 2009 21:20:49 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> The only problem I still have is that keeping the uris in the central
> config file didn't work (all paths in the config file were lowercase while
> the real paths aren't - maybe that's connected to the iss
On Friday, 15. May 2009 22:07:34 xor wrote:
> Wouldn't it take much load off the "internet", i.e. small bandwidth
> connections, if any nodes which are connected via LAN used the LAN for
> routing requests if possible?
I assume that it would also help privacy, because then timing analysis and
sim
On Saturday, 16. May 2009 16:02:19 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Additionally, Gentoo is about choice, if there is a warning, the user can
> choose, with a forcing script, there is no choice, which is a bad idea for
> this philosophy, therefor i vote against such a script for linux.
But in Gentoo it woul
Hi,
It would be nice, if I could tell freenet to use standard ports for
communication - especially for connections inside a LAN (where the possibility
that an admin is watching all used ports might be a bit higher than on the
internet).
I'd think it would be useful to just test a list of por
On Sunday, 17. May 2009 00:59:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Not much point hiding it if you're broadcasting the existence of nodes via
> MDNSDiscovery!
...you're right for OpenNet... should have seen that before.
I assume only a full "steganographic announcement" framework could help there
(have
On Tuesday, 19. May 2009 07:14:20 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
>use-the-port-80-443-53-1863-for-comunication>and vote (3 points) for this
> idea.
I just added the mailbody as comment :)
Best wishes,
Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part o
On Monday, 18. May 2009 15:50:30 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Do you know the numbers of possible browsers? You dont want to add a
> useflag for each of them and additionally this would force the user to use
> exactly the one browser selected by useflag. Additionally, what happens,
> when the selected br
On Wednesday, 20. May 2009 18:14:53 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Depends on your threat model. Freenet traffic clearly doesn't look like
> these without proper stego transport plugins, and the connections between
> nodes definitely don't look like them, unless what you are imitating is
> purely peer t
On Friday, 22. May 2009 23:10:42 Mike Bush wrote:
> I have been watching this debate an I was wondering whether it could
> help to have 2 sets of trust values for each identity in a trust list,
> this could mean you could mark an identity as spamming or that I don't
> want to see these posts again
On Friday, 22. May 2009 23:38:35 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Putting the messages only here is a bad idea. Some of these messages are
> IMPORTANT. What we need to do is: - show the summary on the Browse Freenet
> page and maybe others
> - reduce the number of messages by coalescing them and shifting
On Saturday, 23. May 2009 02:20:23 Clément wrote:
> > > A always seeable (sorry for new words...) button 'Shutdown the node'
> > > and 'Restart the node'
> >
> > You want to encourage people to shut down? IMHO the best way to do that
> > is with a system tray icon.
>
> Hum, in all application you
On Saturday, 23. May 2009 16:06:51 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> People will game the system, no? If they think paedophiles are scum who
> should not be allowed to speak, and they realise that clicking "This is
> spam" is more effective than "This is crap", they will click the former,
> no?
Not if the
On Saturday, 23. May 2009 20:03:25 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Well, no other alert is shown in full at the moment.
>
> Isn't it better to just say "You have 5 messages from friends" ? Or "You
> have 1 new messages from friends" ?
I'm not perfectly sure, but I think it would suffice.
Maybe I react
On Sunday, 24. May 2009 16:52:00 xor wrote:
> Full ACK. Friends page HAS to be separate to encourage users to establish
> darknet connections. Maybe we should even write something about Freenet
> becoming faster with more friend connections - if that's true?
From my experience it is faster - I add
On Monday, 25. May 2009 13:53:45 Florent Daignière wrote:
> And we learnt about it ... Yesterday. Great! We NEED to find a better
> way to get feedback from users.
Couldn't a bug report function be integrated directly into the web-interface?
Upper-right corner, a little bug icon with the text "Re
On Tuesday, 26. May 2009 19:16:14 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Sunday 24 May 2009 17:30:00 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > On Sunday, 24. May 2009 16:52:00 xor wrote:
> > > Full ACK. Friends page HAS to be separate to encourage users to
> > > establish darknet connec
On Wednesday, 27. May 2009 19:53:01 Evan Daniel wrote:
> I have only very rarely had any difficulty determining whether a
> message was spam or not. Why would this be any different?
>
> Of course Advogato gives you the same ability, that is the entire
> point. The precise algorithm is different,
On Saturday, 30. May 2009 19:41:24 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Emu is constantly segfaulting in php-cgi, this is one reason to want to
> move. It would be partly solved by making it all static.
What exactly is needed?
I have some 2GiB diskspace and unknown bandwidth laying unused (I grabbed a
spe
On Monday, 1. June 2009 11:39:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Having said that, we might need somewhere to put mantis, if we decide to
> keep it (although everyone else seems to want to get rid of it). We don't
> have any other need for php afaik, although we need SSL redirects.
How about hosting man
On Monday, 1. June 2009 17:29:05 steve wrote:
> I looked into doing this with Java to make it cross platform, but since
> most Macs lack java6 right now it is non-trivial, and java6 is where the
> systray class was apparently introduced.
Could this work with the crossplatform GNUstep library
On Monday, 1. June 2009 13:55:29 sashee wrote:
> We had a policy where I worked for some time, that if a bug is
> inactive for some time, and cannot be reproduced by the developer,
> will be force closed.
I know that from many other projects.
IIRC Gentoo uses "NEEDINFO" for that.
Best wishes,
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 09:35:24 steve wrote:
> I can certainly look into it, and i know of some projects to make it
> possible.
Great!
Many thanks!
- Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part of the history of free software -
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 13:53:37 Daniel Cheng wrote:
> I have had some very bad experience with SF's servers around year 2001.
> It was slow and buggy. Is that fixed now?
They did some nice updates - I didn't have bad experiences with it for years,
now.
- Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 16:45:25 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> I don't understand what the point is. A progress bar implies that for some
> period of the year we are soliciting donations actively, and for the rest
> of the year we are not.
I think a progress bar would only be useful if there'd be a c
On Tuesday, 2. June 2009 17:48:34 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> IMHO the above is totally unrealistic.
Does that settle the Progress bar question?
- Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part of the history of free software -
http://i
On Wednesday, 3. June 2009 19:08:07 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Web hosting (of static files). Sourceforge provide this, and it should
> perform well. If there is no dynamic code there should be no administrative
> overhead.
They don't allow generating money from the webhosting, so SF can't solve
s
On Wednesday, 3. June 2009 19:08:07 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Mantis: We could run this ourselves using php+mysql on sourceforge servers,
> but we would have to admin it ourselves. Their hosted apps service does not
> currently support importing data, so we would not be able to use that to
> host o
On Thursday, 4. June 2009 14:58:35 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Can you elaborate on this? Are you saying that the only way to take
> donations with sourceforge is through sourceforge's donations system? That
> could cost us a significant amount of money...
That's what I read in their docs:
--
On Thursday, 4. June 2009 20:02:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I vote for lighthouse. I've used Mantis, Trac, and Fogbugz, and
> > Lighthouse is better than all. It is simple, user friendly, doesn't
> > impose any particular way of working, and it has a flexible API.
>
> How is it different to M
On Friday, 5. June 2009 21:59:46 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > I already had that feeling about uservoice, but there I though "oh well,
> > it's not really integral for freenet". But the bugtracker is integral,
> > and relying on a proprietary solution for an integral part of freenet is
> > dangerous
On Saturday, 6. June 2009 00:49:42 Ian Clarke wrote:
> Its only a bugtracker. If they were to suddenly go evil (which they
> have no incentive to do) then it would be an annoyance, but not a
> disaster - we'd just move elsewhere.
When we take a look at the current search for a new solution, I thi
On Saturday, 6. June 2009 00:43:12 Ian Clarke wrote:
> >> Is it free? (I couldn't get that information from my first glance on the
> >> site)
> >
> > No. :|
>
> Yes it is, its free for open source projects, see
> http://sera.lighthouseapp.com/plans
That's gratis but not libre, so it isn't free. Ma
On Monday, 8. June 2009 03:22:13 steve wrote:
> As others have pointed out, we're only talking about a bug tracker, at most
> it is an annoyance and not a threat to the projects security
A bugtracker is _very close_ to a development dependency. How much time did we
now spend with searching for a
On Monday, 8. June 2009 05:44:58 Ian Clarke wrote:
> > And no matter how nice these people are, do you trust their strengths of
> > principles not to stab our back when they get threatened, if their
> > principles aren't even strong enough to make their project free software?
>
> What if it isn't t
Am Montag, 8. Juni 2009 12:10:39 schrieb Florent Daigniere:
> No way. Bugzilla is everything but usable in our case.
OK. So it's Trac (with complex import but DVCS integration), Mantis (which
some don't like) or an unfree solution. Did I miss one?
I didn't yet include roundup, because I only sa
Am Samstag, 13. Juni 2009 21:53:58 schrieb Evan Daniel:
> I don't know. I don't see such an option in WP, but I don't know much
> about the underlying software.
To have a safe wiki it would also be posible to follow the path the GNU/Hurd
took: Have a wiki with DVCS backend.
That way has a few
Am Dienstag, 16. Juni 2009 19:52:32 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Okay. The homepage now says:
> ' Freenet is free software which lets you anonymously share files, browse
> and publish web sites, and chat on forums, without fear of censorship.
> Users are anonymous, and Freenet is entirely decentrali
Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 02:06:06 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
> Blue Gradient background won't work, because:
But it looked very nice to me, and I could read the text quite well...
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
- singing a part of the history of free softwar
Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 05:26:25 schrieb Luke771:
> Browse and publish 'freesites' (Freenet-hosted websites)
This one sounds very nice to me. It gets people into the freenet-speech and at
the same time tells them why we use it (what's the difference between a
freesite and a normal website).
Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 08:06:30 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
> The bad thing is: our fproxy homepage don't have any picture.
>
> Those little ActiveLinks icons got disabled by default.
Try using Firefox - at least for me it shows the activelinks.
Wishes,
Arne
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
Hi,
A few years back I wrote freenet-cards which you can give your friends so they
can easily check your node-ref.
For a long time these lived only on a freesite, but I just pushed them on a
normal website to help spread freenet.
-> http://freenetcard.draketo.de/
Please use them as you see
Am Dienstag, 22. September 2009 21:32:36 schrieb Robert Hailey:
> > -> http://freenetcard.draketo.de/
> I really like the *idea*, but I wish it were easier to implement. It
> would be a pain to enter that huge noderef by hand.
...
> freenet://192.168.0.128:4567/14/xYaEue344
...
> Couldn't we then
Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 10:02:52 schrieb VolodyA! V Anarhist:
> There was a proposal more than a couple of years ago to create poems for
> the node reference. In fact there were two source-ready versions posted
> on this list. They would be way too long to put on a business card, but
>
Am Freitag 03 April 2009 00:44:37 schrieb Ian Clarke:
> If we go with git and github they do support post-receive hooks:
>
> http://github.com/guides/post-receive-hooks
>
> I think the workflow can and should be very similar to what it is
> currently, with developers pushing to a single authoritati
Am Freitag 03 April 2009 02:22:05 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
> DVCS does _NOT_ means accepting anonymous contribution.
>
> However, if we want to, there is nothing stopping us.
Personally I think it important for freenet to slowly establish a workflow
where people contribute pseudonymously, because th
Am Freitag 03 April 2009 12:18:11 schrieb Florent Daigni?re:
> Sure we can do that... but how integrated are the PGP/GPG modules with
> git/hg? What about the GUI versions?
At least for hg you can just activate the gpg extension (distributed with hg)
and can then sign changesets with
$ hg sign
Am Freitag 03 April 2009 17:19:13 schrieb David ?Bombe? Roden:
> On Friday 03 April 2009 14:14:41 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > $ hg sign [REVISION]
>
> git tag -s -m
Is that a GnuPG signed tag?
Best wishes,
Arne
--
-- Ein W?rfel System: http://1w6.org - einfach saube
Am Samstag 04 April 2009 03:29:57 schrieb David ?Bombe? Roden:
> On Friday 03 April 2009 18:29:04 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > > > $ hg sign [REVISION]
> > >
> > > git tag -s -m
> >
> > Is that a GnuPG signed tag?
>
> Yes. Check [1] f
Am Samstag 04 April 2009 22:50:11 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Agreed, however we need to be careful as we can be sued for any
code which is copyrighted by somebody else; if we can provide the
would-be litigant with the identity of the committer, we don't have
this problem.
Sure.
That's why so
Am Freitag 10 April 2009 18:30:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > I think it would be nice to do this as repository which can be updated
> > only if at least 60% of a specific group of people agree.
>
> Why is that beneficial relative to a fully distributed model of people
> pulling if they like a pa
Am Dienstag 07 April 2009 10:28:30 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
> >> > > git tag -s -m
> > Can you also sign a revision without tagging it?
>
> No.
> In DVCS model, signing single revision does not make sense
> -- since you will merge / rebase that revision as soon as it is merged.
I think it does ma
Am Dienstag 21 April 2009 17:41:59 schrieb Theodore Hong:
> VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote:
> > Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > If you watch the 'Human body' documentary it says that humans have on
> > average 20 people they call friends. I am unsure where that number comes
> > from, but if it's some scien
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > other member of the group as freenet friends, or should they only have
> > their closest contacts?
>
> I don't know. IMHO 150 is probably too much, have you spoken privately to
> all these people?
I think all people I know privately,
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:57:06 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > But both have the drawback of drawing people away from the webinterface,
>
> which
>
> > increases the maintenance cost for toad.
>
> Not sure I follow.
They'd be another interface and someone would have to keep it up to date and
wo
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:15:07 schrieb VolodyA! V Anarhist:
> > Wouldn't IRC/Jabber break anonymity ?
> >
> > Or, maybe you're speaking of IRC/Jabber over Freenet and i'm wrong ...
>
> It would only let people know that you are running Freenet, not what you
> are doing with it. And whom you are
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:53:39 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> I don't understand why you want to run a jabber server. Surely announcing
> to your jabber contacts that you are interested in ref exchange would be
> sufficient, and would be client level?
I don't mean announcing to your jabber contac
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 18:26:05 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> block [16:39:31] duplicating the top block can be done with SSKs
> very easily [16:39:40] but with CHKs it requires much longer URIs
> [16:39:43] is that a problem?
> [16:40:04] how much longer?
> [16:40:10] CHK@,, -> CHK@ key 1>,,
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 09:25:15 schrieb xor:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: devl-bounces at freenetproject.org
> > [mailto:devl-bounces at freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Arne
> > Babenhauserheide
> > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:14 AM
>
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 15:16:40 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Arguably nobody ever types CHKs even now, and copy and paste allows for
> fairly long keys. Thoughts?
You know what I think.
The length of the key doesn't matter to me, because freesites already hide
them in links, and otherwise I
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:53:45 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > I don't know. IMHO 150 is probably too much, have you spoken privately to
> > all these people?
>
> I think all people I know priva
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 22:05:18 schrieb Robert Hailey:
> > "The Freenet software running on your computer" is probably what I
> > would use to describe what "node" means to non-techy users.
> > Couldn't it just use "Your computer is downloading this page from
> > Freenet", that's what people w
Am Dienstag 14 April 2009 12:22:12 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> A workflow where the repository gets updated only from repositories
> whose heads got signed by at least a certain percentage of trusted
> committers.
Could someone comment on this?
It's quite security related, so
Am Montag 27 April 2009 17:11:54 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Dienstag 14 April 2009 12:22:12 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> > A workflow where the repository gets updated only from repositories
> > whose heads got signed by at least a certain percentage of trusted
Am Mittwoch 29 April 2009 12:38:15 schrieb xor:
> We're in 2009 and graphical IDEs ought to be able to do the revision
> control, if that does not work then the wrong revision control system or
> IDE is being used. It is really not like revision control is something
> new, it has to be possible wit
Am Freitag, 31. Juli 2015, 08:05:22 schrieb Ian Clarke:
> Thoughts?
I think youre right in your analysis, that fproxy should look and feel
more modern. To address this, there’s already the winterface which
also decouples UI from the core. It is already partially usable and
looks really nice, but i
Am Freitag, 31. Juli 2015, 07:34:31 schrieb Ian Clarke:
> I'm surprised I didn't see these earlier: http://draketo.de/english/freenet
I’m glad you like them!
I’ve been writing about Freenet from time to time, but the accesses
were aroud 1000 to 8000 per article - enough to reach some of the
inter
Just a short notice:
Am Sonntag, 9. August 2015, 12:14:59 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> - When load is high, we tend to kill requests which are close to the
> originator. (But without directly using HTL)
This only works when not using opennet FOAF routing.
Best wishes,
Arne
--
Unpolitisch sein
he
Am Freitag, 14. August 2015, 14:27:23 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> >>> This only works when not using opennet FOAF routing.
> >> I don't see why that would affect this?
> > Because it partially decouples closeness of the node from distance to the
> > receiver.
> >
> > After thinking about it a bit,
Here’s something we should have a look at:
http://www.state.gov/j/drl/p/245721.htm State Department funding opportunity
announced Funding Theme #2: Digital Safety: Support, training and information
resources that contribute to greater digital safety for users in Internet
repressive societies,
Hi,
I finished the last remaining bugfix of ShareWiki and I think it is
ready for inclusion.
https://github.com/ArneBab/plugin-sharewiki/
My only gripe is the name: *wiki suggests collaborative editing which
we it does not really provide. Though you can simply copy the source…
ShareSite wou
Florent said that we received this message via press@…, so keeping in
contact should not be too hard.
If it does not clash with my PhD defense, I should be able to go.
It would be good to know additional details, though.
Best wishes,
Arne
Am Dienstag, 8. September 2015, 15:11:42 schrieb Ian:
> T
301 - 400 of 817 matches
Mail list logo
