Hi there,
On 29/11/2022 23:38, Franklin Weng wrote:
> Believe me or not.
Let me try to provide a quick counter-balance in this thread.
It seems to me extraordinary to criticize Thorsten like this for doing
his job - in line with the best practices for communications as adopted
by
On 23/11/2022 17:22, Andreas Mantke wrote:
You try to mislead the audience a bit here.
I see no evidence of that from Thorsten.
It's not a 'donor' but a business entity from the eco system.
And it is not a donation but a business deal.
I've been criticized for many things, but
On 06/10/2022 12:39:
> Hi everyone,
>
> The Document Foundation has updated its Code of Conduct, the set of
> guidelines that explains to our contributors and users what behaviours
> and interactions we value:
>
> https://www.documentfoundation.org/foundation/code-of-conduct/
It is deeply
Hi there,
Recently at Collabora we received a set of demands from a subset of TDF's board
with a short deadline to 'correct all possible findings' and to correct "on the
indicated pages and on all pages that might contain these or comparable
'infringements'".
These demands
What a silly thread.
Some neutral name for the integration should be picked and
implemented and/or both names be accepted; I would suggest 'lok'
for LibreOfficeKit. Commit/revert wars are a nonsense that helps
no-one - I would expect the ESC should intervene and cut out the
On 15/07/2022 12:11, Stephan Ficht wrote:
### Public Part
1. Answering questions from the community (tdf-board, 5 mins)
Rationale: Provide an opportunity for the community to ask
questions to the board and about TDF
Let me add my questions as I asked them (and as I pasted them to
On 04/07/2022 17:54, Paolo Vecchi wrote:
On 04/07/2022 18:22, Uwe Altmann wrote:
I'm willing to prepare and moderate a session (similar to the one in
Brno) If there is some interest within the community because it
doesn't make sense to do this with three to five Persons new at the
project
Hi Andreas,
On 24/06/2022 16:51, Andreas Mantke wrote:
I'm not sure, if you as a former Collabora staff member don't any
potential CoI in the whole topic.
I'm pretty sure though =) László hasn't worked with Collabora since
2017 and AFAIK has no (even indirect) commercial relationship
Hi there,
Paolo Vecchi wrote on 31.05.22 at 21:03:
TDF to publish LibreOffice in the app stores, especially Apple and
Microsoft. TDF will work to prepare LibreOffice for the app stores
as soon as possible
As this era ends, I'd like to say how pleased we are at
Collabora to have been
Hi Paolo,
On 08/06/2022 09:18, Paolo Vecchi wrote:
That is a copy/paste from a text the general manager of a commercial
contributor sent the 23/05
It is not the greatest vote of confidence in your position that you
critique the source of a counter-proposal rather than the proposal
itself:
Director shall direct day to day management
for the Targeted Developers" - if they want to do that via other
mentors - that's up to them.
Michael Meeks' prefers to have the ESC controlling the
mentor/developers
I think this is the same mis-understanding about how the ESC
behaves a
Hi everyone,
Let me try to provide a simpler proposal that combines several
ideas from the thread and focuses on clarifying the management
aspect. Hopefully as an E-mail it is easier to interact with the
content.
* Rationale
A selection of points from Paolo's discussion on the
On 12/05/2022 13:29, Paolo Vecchi wrote:
after receiving quite a few comments and suggestions it seems like is
time to publish
...
I have received no additional constructive feedback from the board since
the last published version so I assume
...
I'd really love to get some answers
On 06/05/2022 14:42, Regina Henschel wrote:
I thought, ODF is the basic file format for LibreOffice. So I expect,
that writing in 'ODF extended' format is included in the tender anyway.
Sounds sensible to me =) of course, the ball-parks are very often done
quite quickly finger-in-the-air
engineering-steering-committee/
> this way:
> Lionel Elie Mamane (Individual) → Vasily Melenchuk (CIB)
> Andras Timar (Collabora) → Luboš Luňák (Collabora)
> Michael Meeks (Collabora) → Tomaž Vajngerl (Collabora)
> Olivier Hallot (TDF) → Ilmari Lauhakangas
Hi Andreas,
On 14/04/2022 14:38, Andreas Mantke wrote:
On 09/04/2022 13:17, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> https://www.documentfoundation.org/gethelp/developers/ you see
...>> > And if you make a small research inside the git log, you'll find out
> that the list at the website is not up to date.
Hi Andreas,
Let me re-pose the questions that perhaps you missed here:
On 09/04/2022 13:17, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> https://www.documentfoundation.org/gethelp/developers/ you see
> that most of them are contracted by Collabora.
Which seemed inaccurate to me, and:
> And if you make a
Am 09.04.22 um 08:51 schrieb Heiko Tietze:
If you take me as an external observer, the opposite is true.
Collabora is home for many experts, every single one always
supportive, and never acted against the interests of the project.
Thank you for your kind words Heiko - much
Hi there,
Since it seems that there are only complainers on one side of
this discussion let me give another view. If only to avoid the idea
that there should be major concessions on one side only.
I am thrilled that three of our founding team: Kendy, Thorsten
& Cor are on the
Hi Franklin,
On 25/03/2022 14:26, Franklin Weng wrote:
we have seen something like "why do you think we (C*a) would want to
help you in creating a competing product?" when someone asked for help
in our developer's IRC channel.
I'm flattered by what I assume is this new C*a
Hi Emiliano,
On 08/03/2022 22:54, Emiliano Vavassori wrote:
Of course, we are available to further clarify the proposal, if needed,
and we eagerly await for your input on this following version.
Proposal seems reasonable.
This “attic” space will have, at minimum, the following
Hi Andreas,
On 10/03/2022 16:15, Andreas Mantke wrote:
Am 10.03.22 um 15:57 schrieb Florian Effenberger:
the 4 full board members participating in the vote were non-bidders.
In alphabetical order: Caolán, Emiliano, László and Paolo.
As for the 2021 budget, find the vote result at
On 26/02/2022 09:28, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
The board has just decided to suspend the AB membership.
Great work (and quick too).
I do think we need to make it clear in whatever statement and/or
notification we give that the individuals involved are not the problem,
and that the
On 24/02/2022 15:56, Paolo Vecchi wrote:
On 24/02/2022 13:42, Michael Weghorn wrote:
Regarding app stores (p. 5), IIRC, Michael (Meeks) suggested to
separate that topic from the current discussion, which I think makes
sense.
I think it would make sense to focus on identifying non
On 23/02/2022 16:01, Paolo Vecchi wrote:
Thanks to your comments I started writing a more structured proposal
Thanks for doing that that - it helps. There are some good things about
this proposal that are reasonable.
You can find the draft which starts outlining various concepts and
Hi Daniel,
On 10/02/2022 14:53, Daniel A. Rodriguez wrote:
El 10/2/22 a las 08:30, Stephan Ficht escribió:
So, everyone and everything being an important piece in the mosaic for
the big picture for a FLOSS office suite, called LibreOffice.
Crystal clear, for some of us at least
This reminds
Hi Italo,
On 10/02/2022 15:31, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 2/10/22 13:36, Michael Weghorn wrote:
I have the impression that a fundamentally important question is what
the purpose/task of TDF-internal developers would be.
Yes, but it looks like the discussion is blocked one step before
reaching
Hi Simon,
On 14/01/2022 18:14, Simon Phipps wrote:
This has led to progress grinding to a halt through mistrust
If TDF is to satisfy its mission this has to stop. The new Board has a
huge opportunity and responsibility to put all this behind them and lead
positively. It must shun
On 13/01/2022 20:08, Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote:
On 13.1.2022 21.56, Michael Meeks wrote:
Oh - wow, I didn't know that. Wow - that is awful. That crushed
my hopes for a good Firebird based future.
Alex: seems the problem existed before Aug 2016, but not anymore.
...
'The problem
On 13/01/2022 12:35, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Thanks for jumping in on this thread, and I appreciate you having taken
the time to address my points.
Nice to talk the issues through constructively =)
Oh, yes, I still remember the pain involved in transitioning
from PPC to Intel.
Hi Marco,
On 09/01/2022 16:05, Marco Marinello wrote:
> I also would like to emphasize the fact that, in the current situation,
> building a competing product starting from the frozen repo with no
> companies working on it and the one on GitHub 1 year ahead, would just
> be impossible.
Hi Alexander,
Let me jump in with a few thoughts here.
On 12/01/2022 09:08, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Thank you for listening to me, and apologies in advance if I may have
> ruffled a few feathers.
First - don't worry about that =) it's good to discuss this stuff; I
wish more
On 09/01/2022 17:27, Lothar K. Becker wrote:
Both sentences imply that the ESC have in praxis a blocking veto,
independent of the decision by a board, for both procedures.
In general, I think it is wise when (re-)starting an engineering
project to get input from the engineering community
On 23/11/2021 23:45, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
calling for a VOTE on the just-published draft update to the CoI
policy [1], to modify our Rules of Procedure [2] - such that we
reference version 1.3.1 of the CoI policy:
+1,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@collabora.com <><,
On 23/11/2021 06:51, Emiliano Vavassori wrote:
We are all strongly committed to work on
improved iterations, and so we already have a subsequent
work-in-progress version 1.3.0, which I attach to this e-mail. It will
be further enhanced with the contributions of all interested parties, to
I, Michael Meeks, elected member of the Board of Directors of The
Document Foundation, hereby and until further notice, nominate the
following deputy to represent me during board calls and meetings:
1. Nicolas Christener
All the best,
Michael.
--
michael.me
On 08/10/2021 10:37, Emiliano Vavassori wrote:
Il 06/10/21 14:46, Simon Phipps ha scritto:
I will note none of the text has been supplied to or discussed by the
legal committee (where I am a volunteer).
I really appreciate your activity in the project and the Foundation. I
will welcome
On 06/07/2021 15:36, Italo Vignoli wrote:
> As agreed during the last BoD call (July 2nd), I would like the BoD to
> approve the following:
>
> 1. Develop a training for certification (attached), which allows to
> access the "LibreOffice Certified" entry level (without specification
> about
Hi Andreas,
On 25/03/2021 15:06, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> I'm missing some members of TDF bodies and the team here.
> Had they not reached in time or are there different views
> on the topic in general or only the wording?
I think I mentioned the difficulty and expense in time of getting
On 23/03/2021 18:56, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> Am 23.03.21 um 19:11 schrieb Italo Vignoli:
>> OSI statement: https://opensource.org/OSI_Response
>
> great and consequent statement.
Perhaps more measured than:
https://rms-open-letter.github.io/
Which is gathering steam,
Hi Andreas,
On 23/03/2021 10:07, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> What's the position of TDF board on this topic ?
As you know this sort of question is a very easy one to ask but as with
anything where there are a wide diversity of opinions - tends to be an
extraordinarily expensive one to answer
On 11/03/2021 16:28, Uwe Altmann wrote:
> One remark:
> Am 10.03.21 um 22:22 schrieb Michael Meeks:
>> * switch the donate URL in the app - to something that re-directs to
>> ... unfortunately that has no effect for~6 months ]
>
> Maybe we tweak not the URL in the app
Hi Christian,
Is there any way we can differentiate the donation reminder infobar
from the download donation page ?
One of the things we really need to know is the cause of our increase
in donations; and I would love us to do two things:
* switch the donate URL in the
On 10/03/2021 17:31, sophi wrote:> It's Videolabs who is the editor of
the apps, see:> https://www.videolan.org/videolan/partners.html>
Videolabs is the company run by Jean-Baptiste to support VideoLAN
Interesting. There are also some notable differences in the
functionality as described
On 02/02/2021 17:28, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On 02/02/2021 17:10, Daniel Armando Rodriguez wrote:
>> "rewind branches on https://git.libreoffice.org/online and for the time
>> being deny all write
>> operations to the repository, be it on the git or gerrit side.
>
On 02/02/2021 17:10, Daniel Armando Rodriguez wrote:
> "rewind branches on https://git.libreoffice.org/online and for the time
> being deny all write
> operations to the repository, be it on the git or gerrit side.
+1
Michael.
--
michael.me...@collabora.com <><, GM
Hi Florian,
On 02/02/2021 12:15, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> based on the previous discussion, putting the following to VOTE now:
>
> Ask the marketing team to summarize the new LibreOffice Online
> information website (see vote item #1 in
>
On 13/01/2021 17:28, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 4:53 PM Daniel Armando Rodriguez
> Guilhem has a solid point here, if anyone leaves our project why should
> us go behind them?
>
> The people involved have not left our community or the LibreOffice
> project (yet).
On 07/12/2020 15:28, Lothar K. Becker wrote:
> Find the SLIDES with the THREE PROPOSED TAGS at
> https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/sTKeS4NipJ6X9XH
>
> which are from the discussion with our members, and also contain related
> information on their strengths and weaknesses, provided
d these would be removed. If that is the case - then I
support the plan, +1, otherwise it will need significantly more thought.
Was that an oversight in shrinking the slides ? and of course, luckily
it's a link so easy to tweak ?
Thanks,
Michael.
--
Michael Meeks, <&
Hi Daniel,
On 02/12/2020 17:21, Daniel A. Rodriguez wrote:
> I consider that contributions to COOL, should not taken into
> consideration for TDF membership.
I'm sure the membership committee will take all of these things into
consideration as they deliberate. If that is their decision,
door open in all directions.
Keeping that door open is useful; as I wrote in my original
mail:
https://www.mail-archive.com/board-discuss@documentfoundation.org/msg04727.html
On 01/10/2020 10:13, Michael Meeks wrote (here):
> Of course, we would love to see TDF coming up with the rig
Hi Quentin,
On 29/10/2020 00:00, Quentin Christensen wrote:
> I must admit I will have to go back and have a look at the current state
> of issues with LibreOffice 7 and NVDA 2020.3.
If you can come up with a list of prioritized / bucketed a11y issues -
we can try to estimate what it
Hi Andreas,
On 30/09/2020 09:40, Andreas Mantke wrote:
>> c) form sub-group to work out and publish business entity proposals
>> URL: https://redmine.documentfoundation.org/issues/3294
>> Status: Criteria list (Lothar) Draft proposal for Luxemburg entity
>> (Paolo), next meeting
Hi there,
This is a detailed mail, so it shows up as a TLDR; then a
status quo / resolution / benefits triplet, and a link to our FAQ.
We're excited about this as a way to decisively unwind a number of
inter-related problems at TDF. We'll keep an up-to-date version of
this in the FAQ.
*
Hi Daniel,
On 04/09/2020 14:29, Daniel Armando Rodriguez wrote:
>> * many MC members say they want to expand the membership.
>> Given that LibreOffice is rather static in terms of its
>> number of those involved in development: coding, UX,
>> translation, documentation etc.
>>
>> + how
Hi Andreas,
On 03/09/2020 19:59, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> b) TDF currently has 221 members and none of them asked any question to
> the candidates!
>
> That's something to think long and hard about. What does this mean to
> the democratic culture of the foundation. It was created to get the
>
On 17/07/2020 18:52, Daniel Armando Rodriguez wrote:
> Well, misunderstanding of ideas can be avoided simply by communicating
> in such a way that no aspect is taken for granted when making the
> request for feedback.
I have no problem with tools to get polls / feedback from our
On 14/07/2020 12:22, Sophi wrote:
> There is another item here, I know several orgs buying services from
> companies that are not good players with FLOSS communities. This is
> something in my view which is important to address
Absolutely. So - the original plan here was not just just
To
a large degree TDF helps to seed the environment for the ecosystem to
flourish around the codebase and fulfill its mission with it. Arguably
(and I would say this) TDF cannot fill every niche, and serve every
market itself - for a host of reasons.
On 14/07/2020 16:07, toki wrote:
> On 2020/07
Hi Andreas,
On 15/07/2020 18:48, kainz.a wrote:
> If you are at an LibreOffice conference there are 40% people from
> ecosystem and 40% volunteers.
By head-count - there are a vast number of volunteers doing great
stuff, they completely swamp the full-time paid developer head count.
Many
Hi Jonathon,
On 12/07/2020 20:32, toki wrote:
> On 2020/07/08 12:40, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> I think Thorsten stated more cleanly as:
>>
>> "The market for desktop libreoffice is tough;
>> sales cycles frequently count in multiple years&q
Hi Leo,
On 13/07/2020 22:07, Leo Moons wrote:
> It strikes me that there's a lot of talk about large organizations, that
> don't contribute to the community. But why not talk to these
> organizations?
Its a good idea, and of course everyone is trying to do that. For
example when C'bra
n is not
> something you want to rely on in an "enterprise" setting.
Fair enough.
> I'd like to thank Michael Meeks for his thought-provoking analysis,
> though, which makes the motivations behing the branding change more
> understandable. While I'm not necessarily sold on
s
> currently using other office suites to migrate to LibreOffice
> (Enterprise), and I think that the popularity of TDF's LibreOffice plays
> a vital role there as well.
Unless someone tells them that TDF's LibreOffice is not suitable for
their enterprise - their first (and fi
Hi Regina,
First - thank you for your help getting at least one TDF tender
un-blocked to get that ODF 1.3 support implemented. That's much
appreciated :-)
On 13/07/2020 14:13, Regina Henschel wrote:
> "Edition" itself is dangerous too, because it implies, that the download
> from TDF
Hi Uwe,
On 13/07/2020 11:01, Uwe Altmann wrote:
> TLTR?: Become a professional managed organization
I imagine it's not just Italo that has concerns with that =)
> Teach people that LibreOffice is not the gratis version of MS
> Office but a real great idea which they can and shall
Hi Toki,
On 13/07/2020 01:11, toki wrote:
> By way of example, whenever I open a document in> Apache OpenOffice
I think I've detected the location of the bug already.
> and that AOo and LibO are slowly migrating towards
> mutual incompatibility.
I expect that this is a matter
Hi Toki,
On 12/07/2020 22:41, toki wrote:
> They might be mistaken, but in as much as Collabora has
> stated that they have had zero new customers since 2018
To correct this mis-apprehension; I spoke about new Desktop product
customers, and Thorsten reported a similar experience at CIB.
Hi Lionel,
First - thanks for your thoughtful feedback. I essentially agree =)
On 10/07/2020 02:40, Lionel Élie Mamane wrote:
> Redhat will sell you a yearly subscription for a single workstation,
> as low as 180 USD. So will SuSE for 32 GBP. Will any ecosystem company
> scale down ?
On 10/07/2020 11:12, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> With all the feedback received, I strongly propose to leave 7.0 without
> tagging and finalize the plan for a later release.
I share Thorsten's view. While I've generally been a big proponent of
getting everything nailed down in one
Hi Kev,
I havn't had a chance to get back to your rather detailed and
interesting feedback en-mass; but let me respond to just this one
(nearly totally off-topic)
nugget =)
On 10/07/2020 05:15, Kev M wrote:
> Personally, in the IT world, I usually ignore the "contact us for
> pricing"
Hi Alex,
On 06/07/2020 10:27, Alexander Werner wrote in bugzilla at
> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134486#c23
> Cleary, The Document Foundation must release a version that is open
> to all intended audiences. As clearly stated in the statues, the
> intended audience is:
On 09/07/2020 16:23, Italo Vignoli wrote:
> All community members should look regularly at the dashboard, is a very
> useful tool which provides a good overview of activities.
Indeed; you can see it here:
https://dashboard.documentfoundation.org/
Though I believe it is
Hi Peter,
On 07/07/2020 00:46, Peter Dolding wrote:
> Well will all new enterprise need features now appear in the
> "LibreOffice Enterprise" first and then "LibreOffice Enterprise" users
> have to beta test them before they come to Personal Edition?
I think there were some slides which
re interested.
Clearly next time we'll do more shouting from the roof-tops.
> And I personally think, arguments like Michael Meeks (quoting from IRC):
>
> "Individual users don't need to contribute, but they would be OK with
> Personal. But corporate users, that also don't
One clarification since it caused some private questions:
On 07/07/2020 21:13, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Collabora - despite C'bra still putting a lot of work into
> LibreOffice Desktop, having an outstanding support capability, doing
> lots of marketing, being the largest code co
Hi all,
This is a short summary of some of the problems that I see
with LibreOffice, and this is written with my personal / Collabora hat
on. People are welcome to question my motivations - but my mission is to
try to nurture a successful FLOSS project that creates excellent FLOSS
Office
Hi Sam,
On 26/06/2020 17:32, Sam Tuke wrote:
> It seems like only one member of the current Board of Directors was
> present in that meeting (though there may have been some who stayed
> silent; please correct me).
Interestingly the slides were also posted here a week ago, and
discussed
Hi Uwe,
On 19/03/2020 10:23, Uwe Altmann wrote:
> Just got a mail from OwnCloud offering owncloud.online as "ownCloud as a>
> Service" - advertising "integrated OnlyOffice for easy and secure
> real-time collaboration on documents, spreadsheets and presentations"
>
> Is someone there to talk
Hi Drew,
On 11/03/2020 17:43, Drew Jensen wrote:
> I was wondering about the 'FOSDEM goals' is there something that should
> be read before that meeting or is the meeting meant to introduce them?
The latter =) the old & new boards came up with some key goals for the
year a month or go or
Hi Brett,
First thank you for your questions; cogent, lucid, well articulated &
challenging :-)
On 28/02/2020 14:04, Brett Cornwall wrote:
> Other Free Software projects have had for-profit entities created
> underneath the stewardship of a non-profit; Mozilla Corporation and
> Canonical
Hi Dennis,
On 28/02/2020 13:04, Dennis Roczek wrote:
> you just were telling us in the public part of the board meeting that
> the TDF can remove the trade mark of the TDC with a prenotification of
> 30 days.
That is the plan.
> Is the trade mark policy basically the one published in
I, Michael Meeks, elected member of the Board of Directors of The
Document Foundation, hereby and until further notice, nominate the
following deputies to represent me during board calls and meetings, in
the order set forth below:
1. Nicolas Christener
2. Paolo Vecchi
--
Michael
Hi Andreas,
On 20/02/2020 13:57, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> Am 20.02.20 um 14:47 schrieb Franklin Weng:
>> I, Franklin Weng, elected member of the Board of Directors of The
>> Document Foundation, hereby and until further notice, nominate the
>> following deputies to represent me during board calls
Hi Dennis,
On 07/02/2020 17:43, Dennis Roczek wrote:
There are some attractions however to having multiple jurisdictions
involved - we've really appreciated the flexibility that SPI has helped
us with over the years (as an example).
As I do not find the numbers in the already published
Thanks Gabriele,
I, Michael Meeks, elected Director of the Board of "The Document
Foundation", hereby accept this position within the Stiftung
bürgerlichen Rechts "The Document Foundation". My term will start
February 18, 2020.
Signed: Michael Meeks
Ich, Michael Meeks, ge
Hi Andreas,
I for one am grateful for all candidates that stand in the
election. I expect each of them to act as individuals in the best
interest of TDF and for all of them to have a shared primary
affiliation to LibreOffice. I also think we should be encouraging
those people that stand,
Hi Andreas,
As you know, I'm a fan of you & your work on improving LibreOffice.
What you write is (I assume) intended as humorous, but doesn't seem a
terribly fair characterization from many angles.
I'm rather encouraged that lots of board members want to make TDF a
Hi everyone,
Just a quick note to say that I intend to run again for a seat
on the Board of Directors of The Document Foundation. Self-nomination
feels uncomfortable as a concept, but here goes:
* Who am I ?
I'm Michael Meeks: Christian, Husband, Hacker, 42 years old, I try to
shepherd
On 30/09/2019 11:12, Marina Latini wrote:
> at the end of the last board meeting (27.09.2019) I was asked to send
> out this email vote to be posted on this public board-discuss list.
>
> The following vote was proposed during the last meeting:
>
>
Hi Uwe,
On 26/09/2019 15:28, Uwe Altmann wrote:
> Just read the paper. It raised some questions.
It would probably help to come to the next board call and raise your
concerns.
> And what I do not understand at all is the reasons there is such a
> complicated and a difficult to zero
On 30/11/2018 17:03, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> as the discussion seems to have calmed down, and also folks over at
> Apache seem to be supportive - let me call a vote:
>
> * TDF to formally offer the ASF to take over the ODF Toolkit project
> * by copying the existing github repo (minus perhaps
Hi Michael,
First - thanks for working on this, (and Svante too) - it looks
positive overall.
On 28/11/2018 09:40, Michael Stahl wrote:
> so i'll propose to migrate the ODF Toolkit to The Document Foundation.
Seems like something the BoD should vote on, In general, subject to
Hi Jérôme,
On 14/11/2018 22:10, Jérôme Bardot wrote:
> The fact is they do research and like every research there is math and
> math need 2 things number (int, float, etc) and formula.
> And when they migrate all already used formula were broken. And if i
> understand well some of results become
Hi Andreas,
(and thanks for raising this Stephan)
I appreciate the work that you do maintaining the extensions repository
- and it is always difficult to handle feedback.
As you know - if people have a legal concern - they are encouraged to
raise it directly with legal@
Hi Keith,
On 18/04/18 18:39, Keith Curtis wrote:
> 1. Have you thought about creating a plugin for realtime collaboration
> without running in a browser ?
Yes. Checkout eg.
https://people.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2012-03-26-collaboration.html
In a nutshell - I for one abandoned
I, Michael Meeks, elected member of the board of directors of The
Document Foundation, hereby and until further notice, nominate the
following deputies to represent me during board calls and meetings,
in the order set forth below:
1. Jan Holešovský
2. Simon Phipps
3. Osvaldo Gervasi
--
Michael
Hi K-J,
Thanks for your mail,
On 10/01/18 20:04, K-J LibreOffice wrote:
> Am 10.01.2018 um 20:11 schrieb Olivier Hallot:
>> Documentation meeting Minutes Wednesday January 10th 2018
>> Presents: Dave B, Andreas K, Olivier H.
>>
>> Topics:
>> * Book cover:
>> + By consensus of the
o =)
I, Michael Meeks, elected Director of the Board of The Document
Foundation, hereby accept this position within the Stiftung bürgerlichen
Rechts "The Document Foundation". My term will start February 18, 2018.
Signed: Michael Meeks
Ich, Michael Meeks, gewähltes Vorstandsmitglied d
1 - 100 of 257 matches
Mail list logo
