Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-14 Thread MrSinatra

andynormancx;431382 Wrote: 
 Sure you do and you also appear to have federal regulations on how
 bicycles should be put together:
 
 http://tinyurl.com/koqrfz
 
 Handbrakes shall be tested at least ten times by applying a force
 sufficient to cause the handlever to contact the handlebar, or a maximum
 of 445 N (100 lbf), in accordance with the loading test, §1512.18(d)(2),
 and shall be rocked back and forth with the weight of a 68.1 kg (150 lb)
 rider on the seat with the same handbrake force applied in accordance
 with the rocking test, §1512.18(d)(2)(iii); there shall be no visible
 fractures, failures, movement of clamps, or misalignment of brake
 components
 
 Stopping distance. A bicycle equipped with only handbrakes shall be
 tested for stopping distance by a rider of at least 68.1 kg (150 lb)
 weight in accordance with the performance test, §1512.18(d)(2) (v) and
 (vi), and shall have a stopping distance of no greater than 4.57 m (15
 ft) from the actual test speed as determined by the equivalent ground
 speed specified in §1512.18(d)(2)(vi).
 
 etc, etc

did i say we weren't nuts?

socialism is coming here too, its awful.


-- 
MrSinatra

www.lion-radio.org
using:
sb2  sbc (my home) / sbr (parent's home) - w/sc 7.3.3b - win xp pro
sp3 ie8 - 3.2ghz / 2gig ram - 1tb wd usb2 raid1 - d-link dir-655

MrSinatra's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2336
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-12 Thread Goodsounds

Many of you have very strong opinions, and yet don't seem (from your
comments) to understand these issues very well. 

andynormancx;431381 Wrote: 
 
 
 Am I right in saying that in the US, under the law, that the consumer
 bears pretty much all of the risk of faulty products (excluding any
 extra cover that some manufacturers may choose to give) ?

In practice, I would say that this comment is mostly not correct. One
can get stung with a problem just after a warranty period ends, but
usually the responsible party will help when it is clear to not be a
case of abuse/misuse and the owner is being reasonable. 

I think I know the origin of this UK retailer's strategy:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-572077907195969915


-- 
Goodsounds

Goodsounds's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14201
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-12 Thread toby10

andynormancx;431381 Wrote: 
 
 Am I right in saying that in the US, under the law, that the consumer
 bears pretty much all of the risk of faulty products (excluding any
 extra cover that some manufacturers may choose to give) ?


Yup.  Sounds harsh compared to the EU consumer warranty / life
expectancy expectations, no?

But in all practicality, it's pretty much the same as the EU.  It sure
doesn't look good for the OP to resolve his broken device with DABS
after the two year mfr warranty has expired, even with all of those
lovely words in the EU consumer law.  In the end, more than likely,
he'll end up repairing/replacing his 3 year old device himself just as
if he had purchased it in the US.   :)


-- 
toby10

toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-12 Thread andynormancx

Goodsounds;431415 Wrote: 
 Many of you have very strong opinions, and yet don't seem (from your
 comments) to understand these issues very well. 
 
 In practice, I would say that this comment is mostly not correct. One
 can get stung with a problem just after a warranty period ends, but
 usually the responsible party will help when it is clear to not be a
 case of abuse/misuse and the owner is being reasonable. 
 
I didn't ask what happens in practice. I very clear ask who bears the
risk under the law in the US. As far as I am aware the retailer and
manufacturer has very little responsibilities to replace/repair faulty
goods. Am I mistaken ?

And for the record I don't have very strong opinions on the matter,
clearly both different approaches work out reasonably ok in practice.


-- 
andynormancx

Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ?
I SAID ALL OF THEM !

andynormancx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17417
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-12 Thread Goodsounds

andynormancx;431578 Wrote: 
 I didn't ask what happens in practice. I very clear ask who bears the
 risk under the law in the US. As far as I am aware the retailer and
 manufacturer has very little responsibilities to replace/repair faulty
 goods. Am I mistaken ?

Your question is really not relevant, because most companies do not
restrict their behavior to the letter of the law. In other words, most
are more generous and consumer friendly than is required. Bad
reputations are more costly than replacing (when not required to) the
odd item here and there that are out of warranty. But of course there
are exceptions. 

Some companies (mostly retailers) are known to always accept a return
of their goods anytime, no matter what condition, no questions asked. I
suspect they believe the benefits of doing this far outweigh the cost.

Google can help you find whatever interests you concerning the American
UCC (Uniform Commercial Code). There are minor differences from place to
place. I'm not sure why you would care.

andynormancx;431578 Wrote: 
 And for the record I don't have very strong opinions on the matter,
 clearly both different approaches work out reasonably ok in practice.

My comment was directed at some of the earlier vitriolic posts, and my
aim in making the comment before quoting your comment was to indicate I
was referring to others. Sorry if that was not clear.


-- 
Goodsounds

Goodsounds's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14201
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-11 Thread Gooner

Interesting now - DABS have responded with:

Under the sales of goods act, the onus is on the customer to prove
that the item is faulty. This called 'reversal of burden of proof'.
Under this law, you would need to provide sufficient evidence in terms
of an inherent fault report, either from the manufacturer or an
independent computer expert. Once this information is received we can do
one of 3 things. Repair Replace Partial Refund depending age and
usage.

What is a computer expert? :-p


-- 
Gooner

Gooner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5056
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-11 Thread MrSinatra

the EU is nuts, this is the kind of thing you get when you centralize
and socialize gov't and invest power in it rather than individuals.  i
heard the EU has rules and regs for evey possible thing under the sun. 
the example that struck me was specs for brake pad thickness or
something like that for BICYCLES.  does the EU really need to handle
that?  can't entire euro-countries, or an even more local form of gov't
handle that?

in any case, i would suppose you'll have to ask DABS what the law/EU
says makes one a 'computer expert,' as i am sure they will have it
measured, weighed, and codified somewhere.  my guess is some kind of
official, stamped, duplicated certification filed in triplicate at the
central bureau for tediousness.


-- 
MrSinatra

www.lion-radio.org
using:
sb2  sbc (my home) / sbr (parent's home) - w/sc 7.3.3b - win xp pro
sp3 ie8 - 3.2ghz / 2gig ram - 1tb wd usb2 raid1 - d-link dir-655

MrSinatra's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2336
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-11 Thread toby10

Gooner;431149 Wrote: 
 Interesting now - DABS have responded with:
 
 Under the sales of goods act, the onus is on the customer to prove
 that the item is faulty. This called 'reversal of burden of proof'.
 Under this law, you would need to provide sufficient evidence in terms
 of an inherent fault report, either from the manufacturer or an
 independent computer expert. Once this information is received we can do
 one of 3 things. Repair Replace Partial Refund depending age and
 usage.
 
 What is a computer expert? :-p

Uh huh.   :)

But it sure sounded good when all that the EU consumers knew was EU
law dictates that a consumer purchase is covered for the expected life
of the product.  Once you read deep into the bureaucatic written
mumbo-jumbo it amounts to very little actual protection.  Then you have
varying interpretations of such mumbo-jumbo, where and how it applies,
procedures to collect on such warranties, etc... (i.e. your
interpretation of expected product life is vastly different than DABS
interpretation, and only now do you see what you must do to comply with
documentation).

Funny fine print warranty example (not related to consumer law):
Years ago there was a car wiper blade mfr that offered a lifetime
warranty on their $19.95 (per blade) wipers.  Sure sounds great, don't
it?  Until you read the fine print
1.  return the wiper blade and allow 6 to 8 weeks processing (so you
can't drive in rain, snow, or fog for 8 weeks)
2.  just pay a small processing fee.guess how much the small
processing fee was..yes.you guessed it.$19.95

But it all sure sounded good on the box!   :)


-- 
toby10

toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-11 Thread Letten

MrSinatra;431160 Wrote: 
 the EU is nuts, this is the kind of thing you get when you centralize
 and socialize gov't and invest power in it rather than individuals.  i
 heard the EU has rules and regs for evey possible thing under the sun. 
 the example that struck me was specs for brake pad thickness or
 something like that for BICYCLES.  does the EU really need to handle
 that?  can't entire euro-countries, or an even more local form of gov't
 handle that?
 
Sure they can, but most of this kind of regulation is actually driven
by the wish to create the single market (like the US). I havn't heard
about breaking pads, but as it is a safety item I wouldn't be surprised
if it was true that they need to meet certain specifications. We
actually use our bicycles a lot overhere :-), so it matters.

It actually makes good sense to have one set of rules instead of 24!
imagine being a manufacturer of braking pads for bicycles and you want
to sell them in Europe and each copuntry had their own set of rules.

I'm not saying they don't go to far some times, and very often the
rules are a compromise, but I think that most of it makes sense when you
know the reasoning behind it.


-- 
Letten

_
Duet - Audioengine A5
Classic - Sony surround reciever - Jamo 5.1 Speakers / JBL 120Ti
2 Boom's
SC 7.3.3 on Laptop running Windows XP
ZyXEL P-660HW D1 wireless router

Letten's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16718
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-11 Thread Letten

To my knowledge the EU regulation states a minimum of 2 years to make a
claim. An error the first 6 months after delivery is assumed to have
been present at the time of delivery unless the seller can prove that it
was not the case - so this is like a warranty. After the 6 months the
burdon of proof is reversed.

Here is a list of the different claims periods in europe (translated
my...), as you can see it's not the same everywhere.

Country / Claim period
Belgium No specific period. Reasonable time.
Bulgaria2 years
Cyprus  2 years
Denmark 2 years
Estonia 2 years
Finland No specific period
France  2 years
Greece  2 years
Holland No limit
Ireland No limit
Iceland 2 years, and 5 years on certain goods which have a substantial
longer life expectancy
Italy   2 years
Latvia  2 years
Lithuania   No limit
Luxemburg   2 years
Malta   2 years
Norway  2 years, and 5 years on certain goods which have a substantial
longer life expectancy
Pland   2 years
Portugal2 years
Rumania 2 years
Slovakia2 years in general, and at least 1 year for used goods.
5 years on certain goods which have a substantial longer life
expectancy
Slovenia2 years
Spain   3 years
UK  6 years
Sweden  3 years on goods bought after april 1. 2005
( 2 years on goods bought before april 1. 2005)   
Tcheck rep. 2 years
Germany 2 years
Hungary 2 years
Austria 2 years


-- 
Letten

_
Duet - Audioengine A5
Classic - Sony surround reciever - Jamo 5.1 Speakers / JBL 120Ti
2 Boom's
SC 7.3.3 on Laptop running Windows XP
ZyXEL P-660HW D1 wireless router

Letten's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16718
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-11 Thread Pale Blue Ego

If this thread can help you make your case, then here is some data from
an owner of 6 SB systems over a period of 7 years.  I have a SliMP3, a
SB1G, three SB3s, and a Duet system.  All of them work flawlessly, and
the only problem I ever had was that 2 months after I bought the SB1G,
the display failed.  Slim sent me a replacement, along with instructions
on how to swap out the old one.  No problems since.


-- 
Pale Blue Ego

Pale Blue Ego's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=110
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-11 Thread iPhone

Gooner;429473 Wrote: 
 My issue here is not that I need to replace this particular SB3 as I
 already have.  It actually failed around the 2 year mark and that means
 basic cost of ownership was around £100 per annum.
 
 I expected it to last longer.
 
 Now, the law (which I didn't define) states that the supplier, not
 manufacturer is liable if the goods fail in an unreasonable length of
 time.
 
 I admit I have had some benefit from the product, so I'm not expecting
 a full refund, but I would accept compensation for future loss of
 enjoyment from the product.  So if we expect an SB3 to last 5 years and
 it died after 2, then an amount of compensation for the remaining years
 seems reasonable.  Else they could finance the repair of it.
 
 Cliveb makes an excellent point and in the long run, this shift in
 power back to the consumer may result in better quality goods in the
 long run.  They don't make things like they used to :)
 
 By the way, the state of the world economy is not my responsibility. I
 already pay in excess of £30k a year tax which goes to support the
 millions of useless pen-pushing administrators in the non-productive
 government offices.  Don't get me started ;)

This line of thinking is unreasonable and more importantly illogical.
By making the Retailer responsible, all that does is force a retail out
of business. Its not his product, why should he have to stand behind it.
Additionally as Sean said, after expenses, the retail if he was lucky
only cleared 25%. Its hard enough to stay in business as it is, but
having to give a customer a new unit what cost him 60% of retail that he
only made 20% on, again illogical.

This does nothing to sort out bad products, all it does is put the
person with the consumer's best interest at heart in an unattainable
position. Another moronic law! The manufactur should be the one named in
this law. That way they bear the cost, can either offer a recall,
redesign the product, or stop making it! That also stops bad goods from
China and other countries from coming in if they know they are going to
bear this expense.

Lastly, just how in the world is a Retailer going to be able to make a
decision as to whether to carry the latest and greatest product that was
just released when he is going to be responsible for it failing before
the consumer thinks it should?! And yes things don't last as long as
they used to because when it comes to most consumer electronics they are
now disposable. If your CDP, DVDP, or VCR failed would you have it
repaired? Most likely not, its cheaper to buy a new one that is going to
be better then the one you owned.


-- 
iPhone

*iPhone*   
Media Room:
Transporter, VTL TL-6.5 Signature Pre-Amp, Ayre MX-R Mono's,
Vandersteen Quatro, VeraStarr 6.4SE 6-channel Amp, VCC-5 Reference
Center, four VSM-1 Signatures, Runco RS 900 CineWide AutoScope 2.35:1  


Living Room:
Duet, ADCOM GTP-870HD, Cinepro 3K6SE III Gold, Vandersteen Model 3A
Signature, Two 2Wq subs, VCC-2, Two VSM-1  

Kitchen: Squeezebox BOOM
Bedroom: SB3, GFR-700HD, Thiel 2.3, Second Boom
Home Office: SB3, NAD C370, two VSM-1
Home Gym: SB3, Parasound Vamp v.3, Thiel PowerPoint 1.2
House Portable: SB3, Audioengine A5
Thunderbird: Duet, Mac Mini
Expedition: SB3, ToughBook

iPhone's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13622
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-11 Thread MrSinatra

Letten;431208 Wrote: 
 Sure they can, but most of this kind of regulation is actually driven by
 the wish to create the single market (like the US). I havn't heard about
 breaking pads, but as it is a safety item I wouldn't be surprised if it
 was true that they need to meet certain specifications. We actually use
 our bicycles a lot overhere :-), so it matters.
 
 It actually makes good sense to have one set of rules instead of 24!
 imagine being a manufacturer of braking pads for bicycles and you want
 to sell them in Europe and each copuntry had their own set of rules.
 
 I'm not saying they don't go to far some times, and very often the
 rules are a compromise, but I think that most of it makes sense when you
 know the reasoning behind it.

why stop there?

why not one WORLD gov't making rules for the entire planet?

oh yeah, the mighty UN is already trying to do that.

sorry, but i reject your explanation.  it is lunacy to have such micro
management from one power...  what often happens is the rule shouldn't
apply to a given LOCAL situation, but there is no recourse.

btw, we also ride bicycles.


-- 
MrSinatra

www.lion-radio.org
using:
sb2  sbc (my home) / sbr (parent's home) - w/sc 7.3.3b - win xp pro
sp3 ie8 - 3.2ghz / 2gig ram - 1tb wd usb2 raid1 - d-link dir-655

MrSinatra's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2336
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-11 Thread bobertuk

Is the EU just becoming a Federal Government? Possibly an equivalent to
the USA but with only 24 states so far?

The United States of Europe!

Hmmm


-- 
bobertuk

1 x Duet - SC 7.3.3 - SSOTS v3.17
Lavry DA-10 DAC
QNAP TS-509 3.1.0 b529T
Starfish Pre-amp : Based on NAIM
Heavily modified NAIM NAP 250 Power-amp
Behringer DEQ2496
Linn Isobarik DMS

bobertuk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=30376
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-11 Thread andynormancx

iPhone;431266 Wrote: 
 
 This does nothing to sort out bad products, all it does is put the
 person with the consumer's best interest at heart in an unattainable
 position. Another moronic law! The manufactur should be the one named in
 this law. That way they bear the cost, can either offer a recall,
 redesign the product, or stop making it! That also stops bad goods from
 China and other countries from coming in if they know they are going to
 bear this expense.
And there lays the heart of the problem with making a law to force the
manufacturer to cover a long statuary warranty period. How on earth does
the consumer get some random manufacturer in China pay up when something
fails 6 months after purchase ?

In fact for that matter, who is the manufacturer ? Most companies now
don't do their own manufacture of electronics products. So is the
manufacturer the company that built the goods, the company whose name
is on the goods, the wholesaler who brought them into the company ?

At least with the retailer as the one responsible they are clearly
defined and it gives the consumer someone to go back to with the faulty
goods.

Am I right in saying that in the US, under the law, that the consumer
bears pretty much all of the risk of faulty products (excluding any
extra cover that some manufacturers may choose to give) ?


-- 
andynormancx

Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ?
I SAID ALL OF THEM !

andynormancx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17417
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-11 Thread andynormancx

MrSinatra;431299 Wrote: 
 
 btw, we also ride bicycles.
Sure you do and you also appear to have federal regulations on how
bicycles should be put together:

http://tinyurl.com/koqrfz

Handbrakes shall be tested at least ten times by applying a force
sufficient to cause the handlever to contact the handlebar, or a maximum
of 445 N (100 lbf), in accordance with the loading test, §1512.18(d)(2),
and shall be rocked back and forth with the weight of a 68.1 kg (150 lb)
rider on the seat with the same handbrake force applied in accordance
with the rocking test, §1512.18(d)(2)(iii); there shall be no visible
fractures, failures, movement of clamps, or misalignment of brake
components

Stopping distance. A bicycle equipped with only handbrakes shall be
tested for stopping distance by a rider of at least 68.1 kg (150 lb)
weight in accordance with the performance test, §1512.18(d)(2) (v) and
(vi), and shall have a stopping distance of no greater than 4.57 m (15
ft) from the actual test speed as determined by the equivalent ground
speed specified in §1512.18(d)(2)(vi).

etc, etc


-- 
andynormancx

Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ?
I SAID ALL OF THEM !

andynormancx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17417
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-11 Thread Keymaster

peterw;429300 Wrote: 
 MP3 sampling artifacts pumped straight in the neurons would be so LAME.

Maybe I've certifiably lost it...but I thought this was
hysterical...like snorting+laughing hystericalLOL

Nice one!!


-- 
Keymaster

Keymaster's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=30281
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-11 Thread nolesrule

andynormancx;431381 Wrote: 
 And there lays the heart of the problem with making a law to force the
 manufacturer to cover a long statuary warranty period. How on earth does
 the consumer get some random manufacturer in China pay up when something
 fails 6 months after purchase ?
 
 In fact for that matter, who is the manufacturer ? Most companies now
 don't do their own manufacture of electronics products. So is the
 manufacturer the company that built the goods, the company whose name
 is on the goods, the wholesaler who brought them into the company ?
 
 At least with the retailer as the one responsible they are clearly
 defined and it gives the consumer someone to go back to with the faulty
 goods.
 
 Am I right in saying that in the US, under the law, that the consumer
 bears pretty much all of the risk of faulty products (excluding any
 extra cover that some manufacturers may choose to give) ?

The manufacturer is the company that offers the manufacturer warranty,
or in absence of that, the company that puts its name on the label (or
its successors in interest).


-- 
nolesrule

nolesrule's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9429
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-11 Thread Letten

andynormancx;431382 Wrote: 
 Sure you do and you also appear to have federal regulations on how
 bicycles should be put together:
 
 http://tinyurl.com/koqrfz
 
 Handbrakes shall be tested at least ten times by applying a force
 sufficient to cause the handlever to contact the handlebar, or a maximum
 of 445 N (100 lbf), in accordance with the loading test, §1512.18(d)(2),
 and shall be rocked back and forth with the weight of a 68.1 kg (150 lb)
 rider on the seat with the same handbrake force applied in accordance
 with the rocking test, §1512.18(d)(2)(iii); there shall be no visible
 fractures, failures, movement of clamps, or misalignment of brake
 components
 
 Stopping distance. A bicycle equipped with only handbrakes shall be
 tested for stopping distance by a rider of at least 68.1 kg (150 lb)
 weight in accordance with the performance test, §1512.18(d)(2) (v) and
 (vi), and shall have a stopping distance of no greater than 4.57 m (15
 ft) from the actual test speed as determined by the equivalent ground
 speed specified in §1512.18(d)(2)(vi).
 
 etc, etc

Socialist bastards ;-)


-- 
Letten

_
Duet - Audioengine A5
Classic - Sony surround reciever - Jamo 5.1 Speakers / JBL 120Ti
2 Boom's
SC 7.3.3 on Laptop running Windows XP
ZyXEL P-660HW D1 wireless router

Letten's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16718
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-05 Thread jo-wie

iPhone;429434 Wrote: 
 Europe wants it all. The lowest price and if it fails after the warranty
 but before I think it should I want a free one. At the most if the law
 even made a little sense you should only receive fair market value for a
 3 year old used SB3. Did I mention it's electronics.

I think that's a little bit to general.

For example, in Germany you have an implied warranty of 2 years and the
reseller is responsible. The point is, in the first 6 month it is
supposed that the fault do already exist when the unit was delivered and
the reseller has to prove if not. That's easy for the customer. But for
the rest of the time the customer has to prove that the fault do already
exist during delivery. That's not easy for the customer.

This warranty is based on an European act!

But in most cases the manufacturer provide a limited guarantee which is
better and the issue is handled by the manufacturer and not the
reseller.


-- 
jo-wie

SB Classic, SC 7.3.3 auf GigaByte STA/C mit VIA C7 1GHz, 1GB RAM, 250 GB
2,5 HD, Ubuntu Desktop 8.04

last.fm/user/jo-wie

jo-wie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17952
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-05 Thread htrd

From what I understand about this process, it is not enough to show that
many SB3s are still running after 3 years. A retailer has no
responsibility to replace a product that has simply reached the end of
its life, even if the life of your particular SB3 is shorter than
average. You would need to show that the failure was due to a latent
fault present at purchase, or that the SB3 lacked the expected
durability. 

So a better question to ask here might be whether anyone who bought an
SB3 thought it was an investment that should last many years, or whether
they thought it might reach its normal end of life within a few years?


-- 
htrd

Toby Dickenson
Search eBay for music matching your last.fm profile;
www.exitahead.co.uk

htrd's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3710
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-05 Thread cliveb

seanadams;429442 Wrote: 
 So I hardly see how it's fair that a retailer, who if they're doing well
 has collected perhaps 20-30% on the whole deal, should be liable for the
 full value of the product ages after they've sold it.
I'm not defending this law, but playing devil's advocate for a moment,
perhaps it's an indirect way of weeding out products that routinely fail
to give reasonable service. Over time, multiple retailers will notice
that they're hurting because of repeated failures of a particular item,
and make a business decision to stop selling them. Eventually said item
disappears from the marketplace, to everyone's benefit (apart from the
manufacturer of said shoddy item). BTW: Let me make it absolutely clear
that I'm NOT suggesting the Squeezebox falls into this category! 

Back to reality: I reckon the way some people on this thread are
interpreting this law is not realistic. It seems that quite a few UK
laws are open to unreasonable interpretation by the man in the street,
in a way that was never intended when it was written. If this specific
dispute went to court, I strongly suspect that DABS would win. Gooner is
just unlucky: sometimes sh*t happens.


-- 
cliveb

Transporter - ATC SCM100A

cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-05 Thread sebp

jo-wie;429466 Wrote: 
 The point is, in the first 6 month it is supposed that the fault do
 already exist when the unit was delivered and the reseller has to prove
 if not. That's easy for the customer. But for the rest of the time the
 customer has to prove that the fault do already exist during delivery.
 That's not easy for the customer.
The (simplest) reality about this EU act is that the reseller is only
responsible for delivering the consumer a good that conforms to its
standard use and advertised specifications (could be colour, noise,
width, power consumption, whatever ...).
A hardware fault, unless it existed at the moment of the delivery, is
not endorsed by this EU act.


-- 
sebp

System : Mac Mini for ripping to FLAC (XLD)  SqueezeCenter 7.3 running
on a ReadyNAS NV+
Living room : Transporter  NuForce IA-7 v2  KEF iQ9
Bedroom : Squeezebox 3  Beresford DAC  NAD C315BEE  KEF iQ3
Kitchen : SB Receiver  Trends Audio TA10.1  Celestion F10
Bathroom : SB Boom
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/sebp)

sebp's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11768
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-05 Thread Gooner

My issue here is not that I need to replace this particular SB3 as I
already have.  It actually failed around the 2 year mark and that means
basic cost of ownership was around £100 per annum.

I expected it to last longer.

Now, the law (which I didn't define) states that the supplier, not
manufacturer is liable if the goods fail in an unreasonable length of
time.

I admit I have had some benefit from the product, so I'm not expecting
a full refund, but I would accept compensation for future loss of
enjoyment from the product.  So if we expect an SB3 to last 5 years and
it died after 2, then an amount of compensation for the remaining years
seems reasonable.  Else they could finance the repair of it.

Cliveb makes an excellent point and in the long run, this shift in
power back to the consumer may result in better quality goods in the
long run.  They don't make things like they used to :)

By the way, the state of the world economy is not my responsibility. I
already pay in excess of £30k a year tax which goes to support the
millions of useless pen-pushing administrators in the non-productive
government offices.  Don't get me started ;)


-- 
Gooner

Gooner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5056
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-05 Thread andynormancx

seanadams;429442 Wrote: 
 
 If the UK really wants this kind of coverage built in to every product
 that is sold there, then people are effectively saying they want to be
 forcibly charged for an extended warranty with every purchase -
 because that's the only way that this policy could be sustained.
This law has been in effect in the UK for at least 30 years. The
reality is that people rarely take advantage of it, except when
something breaks early on.

In fact most people in the UK seem to think that everything has a 12
warranty and nothing more.

I suspect that if this went to the small claims court that Dabs
wouldn't even bother to contest it. It just isn't worth their while.

In the UK you can take a small claims court action just by filling in
forms online and paying as little as £25. People rarely do though. Most
of the people I do know who have taken an action against a large company
won, simply because the company didn't bother to contest the claim.


-- 
andynormancx

Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ?
I SAID ALL OF THEM !

andynormancx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17417
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-05 Thread bradcook

I bought my original SB2 back in 2005 and it worked flawlessly until Nov
last year when it just died one evening.

Fortunately it was only the power supply - so a £5 replacement original
supply from Patrick at At-tunes got me up and running again.

My Duet, Receivers and Boom are less than a year old so I cant really
comment on those.


Warranties are a difficult one.

Any specific time is quite arbitrary, and I think you should expect a
reasonable life time for a product, which is what the UK law details. I
certainly wouldnt want to spend the best part of £300 on a Duet if I
only expected it to last a year - but how long should it last - 3 years,
5, 10 

I certainly wasnt a happy bunny after my original ipods battery want
down to only holding charge for 10 mins within 18 months of purchase.
Not what I expected after paying the £399 at the time. I know battteries
are consumer items that dont last forever - but would expect more than
this (especially as it wasnt replaceable at the time).

Dont forget that companies (and I certainly dont include Slim/Logitech
here) can cut corners by using cheaper parts that could outlast the
warranty but not have an especially long life.


-- 
bradcook

bradcook's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1033
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-05 Thread nwplace

andynormancx;429498 Wrote: 
 
 In the UK you can take a small claims court action just by filling in
 forms online and paying as little as £25. People rarely do though. Most
 of the people I do know who have taken an action against a large company
 won, simply because the company didn't bother to contest the claim.

You should bear in mind that if the other party does bother to turn and
wins the case then you may be liable to some or all of their costs at
the discretion of the court.


-- 
nwplace

nwplace's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16529
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-05 Thread toby10

nwplace;429538 Wrote: 
 You should bear in mind that if the other party does bother to turn and
 wins the case then you may be liable to some or all of their costs at
 the discretion of the court.

Which is why having such vague terms and ambiguity is just plain silly!
:)


-- 
toby10

toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-05 Thread Richie

seanadams;429442 Wrote: 
 
 So I hardly see how it's fair that a retailer, who if they're doing
 well has collected perhaps 20-30% on the whole deal, should be liable
 for the full value of the product ages after they've sold it. 
 

They're not liable for the full value. The law is vague but it
basically says that the retailer is liable, for up to six years, for
what a reasonable person would expect.

In practice, if we could assume that a reasonable person would expect a
squeezebox to last four years given that it is a premium product and
that it's mode of use means it sits somewhere and does it's job. If the
squeezebox failed after three years the retailer would only be liable
for 25% of the value. The retailer is only liable for the usage you have
been deprived of not the usage you have had.

This is a reason why many products cost more in the UK. I'm sure it's a
cost that many small businesses competing online underestimate.

Richard


-- 
Richie

Richie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=88
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-05 Thread Peter
andynormancx wrote:
 toby10;429283 Wrote: 
   
 Maybe some details on your situation would result in some more
 insightful responses.
 I think the SB3's have a 2 yr mfr warranty.  I'm guessing DABS is a
 reseller of SB players?  Not sure why they would be involved past a
 possible 30 day return policy.

 
 Looks like you are thinking about it from a US point of view. Dabs are
 a UK company and UK consumer law is _very_ different to the US.

 In the UK it is the retailers responsibility if a product fails before
 a within a reasonable period. What the reasonable period is deemed to be
 can extend to years, not just the typical US 30 days return policy.
   

Isn't that an EU directive?

Regards,
Peter

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-05 Thread andynormancx

peter;429580 Wrote: 
 andynormancx wrote:
  toby10;429283 Wrote: 

  Maybe some details on your situation would result in some more
  insightful responses.
  I think the SB3's have a 2 yr mfr warranty.  I'm guessing DABS is a
  reseller of SB players?  Not sure why they would be involved past a
  possible 30 day return policy.
 
  
  Looks like you are thinking about it from a US point of view. Dabs
 are
  a UK company and UK consumer law is _very_ different to the US.
 
  In the UK it is the retailers responsibility if a product fails
 before
  a within a reasonable period. What the reasonable period is deemed to
 be
  can extend to years, not just the typical US 30 days return policy.

 
 Isn't that an EU directive?
 

It was in place back in 1976, before we implemented the later EU
directive.


-- 
andynormancx

Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ?
I SAID ALL OF THEM !

andynormancx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17417
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


[slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread Gooner

Hello everyone.

I'm interested in views as to how many years I could expect a
Squeezebox to function fault free.

If you own one of these, could you let me know how long you've had it
and whether it continues to work :)

This is in relation to a dispute I'm having with DABS.COM

All input greatly received.

Thanks
Simon


-- 
Gooner

Gooner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5056
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread stevek1006

My oldest is an original Squeezebox dating back to 2003. It works just
fine and has never had a problem. I also have Squeezebox 2 from 2005 and
Duet I purchased sometime in 2008. I have had no problems with any of
them.


-- 
stevek1006

-Steve
--
Steven Kramer
stevek1050...@comcast.net
--

stevek1006's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1369
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread amey01

How long is a piece of string? Don't forget, we're talking about a
computer product so I certainly wouldn't expect 20++ years like other
appliances. My SB3 is three years old and no problems yet. I don't have
any reason not to see why it wouldn't double that easily and possibly
make 10 years without an issue. 

There are many on this very forum using almost 10 year old SlimMP3s and
SB1s - they're still supported by SC and are presenting no issues. Great
work Slim Devices!!


-- 
amey01

amey01's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11274
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread Siduhe

I have an SB2 purchased when it was released in 05 which continues to
work well and my better half is still running his original SB purchased
in 03/04. 

As already noted, there are people still running the SLIMP3 (first
released in 2001) quite happily.

SB products do fail (wireless card issues, display issues and power
issues seem most common - also people dropping them!), but my sense is
that they are generally fairly reliable.

SD will also try to repair failed units even if out of warranty, so if
you're in dispute with DABS, they might be persuaded to pay the $90
charge* plus PP if they aren't prepared to give you a new unit.

*not sure if this is still the flat price for an attempted repair


-- 
Siduhe

Who am I on 'LAST.FM' (http://www.last.fm/user/siduhe)?
-Siduhe Loved Tracks radio got the thumbs up. Feedback included: yeah,
it's good... got the odd dodgy track tho...- (c) 'ModelCitizen'
(http://www.last.fm/user/Modelcitizen)
Oh yeah, I'm giving 'Twitter' (http://twitter.com/Siduhe) a try - and
surprising myself how many interesting people are out there...

Siduhe's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=723
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread Michael Herger
 I'm interested in views as to how many years I could expect a
 Squeezebox to function fault free.

I'm still using my SliMP3 from 2003.

-- 

Michael
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread Gooner

Thanks for your feedback so far.  This all sounds positive and helps my
case.  If anyone else has a squeezebox classic, please let me know how
long you've had it and if it continues to function.

Thanks
Simon


-- 
Gooner

Gooner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5056
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread Keymaster

2 Classics, 2 years old each, and my brother has a pair as well, maybe a
year older.

No issues at all.  Nothing but goodness =).

Best of luck!


-- 
Keymaster

Keymaster's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=30281
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread agillis

Electronic devices that have no moving parts and generate no (or very
little) heat can last almost forever. I have had a classic for 5 years
with no problems.


-- 
agillis

rip, tag, get cover art… All you do is insert the CD!
http://vortexbox.org

agillis
Lead Developer VortexBox

agillis's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=21140
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread Siduhe

Gooner;429235 Wrote: 
 Thanks for your feedback so far.  This all sounds positive and helps my
 case.  If anyone else has a squeezebox classic, please let me know how
 long you've had it and if it continues to function.
 
 Thanks
 Simon

Also have 2 Classics (what I would call the SB3). Both purchased in
early 2006. One used daily, one used pretty much non-stop for two years
but now replaced by a Boom and out of general use (in one of our spare
bedrooms)*  

Both working fine save for a very slight amount of screenburn on the
display in one particular area, on the daily use one.

* This thread has now made me count up the number and variety of SD
products in occasional and regular use in our home.  Gulp.


-- 
Siduhe

Who am I on 'LAST.FM' (http://www.last.fm/user/siduhe)?
-Siduhe Loved Tracks radio got the thumbs up. Feedback included: yeah,
it's good... got the odd dodgy track tho...- (c) 'ModelCitizen'
(http://www.last.fm/user/Modelcitizen)
Oh yeah, I'm giving 'Twitter' (http://twitter.com/Siduhe) a try - and
surprising myself how many interesting people are out there...

Siduhe's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=723
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread sc53

3 Classics, all purchased before the Logitech takeover, all running
fine. No display burn in or any other issues.


-- 
sc53

sc53's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8690
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread funkstar

Both my SB3's (now the classic) were bought in early 2006, both going
scrong.

My SB2, SB and SliMP3 all still work too.


-- 
funkstar

my collection:
*1*x boom
*2*x controller, *1*x receiver
*2*x sb3 (sliver/black, *1*x sb2 wired (silver), *1*x sb (black)
*1*x slimp3 (with rear shield)

interested in any others if you have them!

funkstar's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2335
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread jth

I bought all my squeezeboxen shortly after they were released. I've had
some problems with the original squeezebox (not Classic) but not with
other models.

2 SLIMP3s - no problems since original purchase
3 Squeezebox 1s - 1 VFD display died about 1.5 years after purchase,
replacement part purchased. 1 unknown problem on the main circuit board
about 2 years after purchase (different unit). This one got put back in
the box for spare parts and replaced with a SB3.
1 Squeezebox 3 - no problems since original purchase

Hope this helps - despite those problems I will continue to buy more
as
required :)


-- 
jth

jth's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread cliveb

Gooner;429226 Wrote: 
 If you own one of these, could you let me know how long you've had it
 and whether it continues to work :)
 
 This is in relation to a dispute I'm having with DABS.COM
I have an SB2 bought in April 2005 which has never missed a beat.

What's the problem you're having with DABS? I've done a lot of business
with them and they always seemed pretty reputable to me. I have had
cause to return a couple of items and they never made a fuss.

If you've got a SB that's gone faulty within a year, then they are
obliged to get it fixed (or replace it) under warranty. If it's more
than a year old, then it'll be out of warranty and they're perfectly
within their rights to refer you to the manufacturer.


-- 
cliveb

Transporter - ATC SCM100A

cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread aubuti

Gooner;429235 Wrote: 
 Thanks for your feedback so far.  This all sounds positive and helps my
 case.  If anyone else has a squeezebox classic, please let me know how
 long you've had it and if it continues to function.
All my SBs are fine. The only hardware problems I have had have been
with pre-production versions used during beta testing. And when those
problems popped up, Slim Devices / Logitech cheefully replaced them free
of charge. More importantly, those specific issues do not seem to be
problems with the final production models. My SB family includes:

-- 1 x SB3 (aka SB Classic) purchased in December 2005
-- 2 x SB2s that I purchased second hand in 2006 (original owners
probably purchased in 2005, but one of them could have been 2006)
-- 2 x SB Duet Receivers acquired in Jan-Mar 2008 (both pre-production
units. One has a defective RJ-45 port, an issue that appears to have
been resolved before the final product started shipping.)
-- 3 x SB Duet Controllers acquired between Sept 2007 and Jan 2008 (2
pre-production units had to be replaced because of a UUID problem)
-- 1 x SB Boom acquired June 2008


-- 
aubuti

aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2074
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread toby10

Gooner;429226 Wrote: 
 Hello everyone.
 
 I'm interested in views as to how many years I could expect a
 Squeezebox to function fault free.
 
 If you own one of these, could you let me know how long you've had it
 and whether it continues to work :)
 
 This is in relation to a dispute I'm having with DABS.COM
 
 All input greatly received.
 
 Thanks
 Simon

Maybe some details on your situation would result in some more
insightful responses.
I think the SB3's have a 2 yr mfr warranty.  I'm guessing DABS is a
reseller of SB players?  Not sure why they would be involved past a
possible 30 day return policy.

My SB3 is 2 years old, used often, no problems.


-- 
toby10

toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread seanadams

Like most solid state products, Squeezebox products have a bathtub
curve reliability characteristic. This means if you're going to have a
failure it is most likely to occur out-of-the-box (shipping trauma) or
within the first few weeks of ownership (faulty component). After that,
it should last until the DCI (direct cranial implant) MP3 players become
available.


-- 
seanadams

seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread peterw

seanadams;429297 Wrote: 
 After that, it should last until the DCI (direct cranial implant) MP3
 players become available.

MP3? I figured the DCI gear would at least be Red Book PCM quality. MP3
sampling artifacts pumped straight in the neurons would be so LAME.


-- 
peterw

http://www.tux.org/~peterw/
free plugins: http://www.tux.org/~peterw/#slim
AllQuiet BlankSaver ContextMenu FuzzyTime KidsPlay
KitchenTimer PlayLog PowerCenter/BottleRocket SaverSwitcher
SettingsManager SleepFade StatusFirst SyncOptions VolumeLock

peterw's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2107
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread Pat Farrell
Gooner wrote:
 I'm interested in views as to how many years I could expect a
 Squeezebox to function fault free.

I've got three SB-1 from ~2003 that work fine. Plus a Duet, Boom, and
Transporter. I've never had a failure. I've got 25 or more Slim Years of
experience.

-- 
Pat Farrell
http://www.pfarrell.com/

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread iPhone

Gooner;429226 Wrote: 
 Hello everyone.
 
 I'm interested in views as to how many years I could expect a
 Squeezebox to function fault free.
 
 If you own one of these, could you let me know how long you've had it
 and whether it continues to work :)
 
 This is in relation to a dispute I'm having with DABS.COM
 
 All input greatly received.
 
 Thanks
 Simon

Simon, hello and welcome to the Forums and the wonderful world of
Squeezebox.

Sorry to hear your having a problem. Knock on wood my Squeezeboxes are
no longer under warranty and all still doing fine. I think your real
question should be whether or not your unit is still within the factory
warranty. If not, I am sorry to say this but you are most likely barking
up the wrong tree. After all it is an electronic device and parts can
just up and die even with the best of manufacture's intentions (which is
the case with SC). It could have been something you did or just a simple
power surge.

Hardly anything lasts for ever and if its electronic it might not come
back on the next time any of us hits the power button. 

BTW, I am assuming you checked to make sure it wasn't something simple
like the power supply being dead?


-- 
iPhone

*iPhone*   
Media Room:
Transporter, VTL TL-6.5 Signature Pre-Amp, Ayre MX-R Mono's,
Vandersteen Quatro, VeraStarr 6.4SE 6-channel Amp, VCC-5 Reference
Center, four VSM-1 Signatures, Runco RS 900 CineWide AutoScope 2.35:1  


Living Room:
Duet, ADCOM GTP-870HD, Cinepro 3K6SE III Gold, Vandersteen Model 3A
Signature, Two 2Wq subs, VCC-2, Two VSM-1  

Kitchen: Squeezebox BOOM
Bedroom: SB3, GFR-700HD, Thiel 2.3, Second Boom
Home Office: SB3, NAD C370, two VSM-1
Home Gym: SB3, Parasound Vamp v.3, Thiel PowerPoint 1.2
House Portable: SB3, Audioengine A5
Thunderbird: Duet, Mac Mini
Expedition: SB3, ToughBook

iPhone's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13622
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread Robin Bowes
Gooner wrote:
 Hello everyone.
 
 I'm interested in views as to how many years I could expect a
 Squeezebox to function fault free.
 
 If you own one of these, could you let me know how long you've had it
 and whether it continues to work :)
 
 This is in relation to a dispute I'm having with DABS.COM
 
 All input greatly received.

Simon,

As you're talking about dabs.com and your handle is gooner (Arsenal 
fan?) I am assuming you're in the UK?

You might find this interesting:

http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/consumers/fact-sheets/page38311.html

R.

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread andynormancx

toby10;429283 Wrote: 
 Maybe some details on your situation would result in some more
 insightful responses.
 I think the SB3's have a 2 yr mfr warranty.  I'm guessing DABS is a
 reseller of SB players?  Not sure why they would be involved past a
 possible 30 day return policy.
 
Looks like you are thinking about it from a US point of view. Dabs are
a UK company and UK consumer law is _very_ different to the US.

In the UK it is the retailers responsibility if a product fails before
a within a reasonable period. What the reasonable period is deemed to be
can extend to years, not just the typical US 30 days return policy.

Any warranty a manufacturer might choose to provide is in addition to
the rights the consumer has under the UK Sale Of Goods act.


-- 
andynormancx

Yes, it will. Yes, all of them. Yes, SoftSqueeze as well. What ?
I SAID ALL OF THEM !

andynormancx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17417
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread Goodsounds

Robin Bowes;429316 Wrote: 
 
 Simon,
 
 As you're talking about dabs.com and your handle is gooner (Arsenal 
 fan?) I am assuming you're in the UK?
 
 You might find this interesting:
 
 http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/consumers/fact-sheets/page38311.html
 
 R.

Out of curiosity I scanned the linked material - Very interesting.

I'm not a retailer, but I don't think a rule like that would work very
well in the US. I'd be interested to know more about how it works in the
UK.

This would seem to really put sellers in a precarious position. Maybe
that's why things always seem so expensive in the UK (and not just
because of exchange rates and/or VAT). They would need to pay for such a
long term guarantee some how, and maybe the high prices are the
result.


-- 
Goodsounds

Goodsounds's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14201
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread Gooner

cliveb;429279 Wrote: 
 What's the problem you're having with DABS? I've done a lot of business
 with them and they always seemed pretty reputable to me. I have had
 cause to return a couple of items and they never made a fuss.
 
 If you've got a SB that's gone faulty within a year, then they are
 obliged to get it fixed (or replace it) under warranty. If it's more
 than a year old, then it'll be out of warranty and they're perfectly
 within their rights to refer you to the manufacturer.

Not true!

ok - the scenario is that I bought my SB3 in April 2006, it recently
died i.e. no activity when plugged into the mains.

I since became aware that under uk law, the Sales and Supply of Goods
Act 1994 stipulates that the supplier (not manufacturer) is liable to
either refund, repair or replace the product for anything up to 6 years
from purchase if the product fails within a reasonable period.

DABS responded today stating that it was not reasonable to expect an
SB3 to be without fault after 36 months.

Now it is up to me, the purchaser, to prove otherwise.  All the
responses in this thread are a great help because I can state e.g. 20
people have posted experiences of SB3 working for 3 years plus, and none
have had a catastrophic failure such as mine in such a short period. 
Therefore it is reasonable that I should expect my unit to last for a
comparable amount of time to that of fellow owners and as it hasn't,
there was clearly an inherent fault with the unit.

So we'll see where it goes next.


-- 
Gooner

Gooner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5056
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread cliveb

Gooner;429326 Wrote: 
 the scenario is that I bought my SB3 in April 2006, it recently died
 i.e. no activity when plugged into the mains.
 
 I since became aware that under uk law, the Sales and Supply of Goods
 Act 1994 stipulates that the supplier (not manufacturer) is liable to
 either refund, repair or replace the product for anything up to 6 years
 from purchase if the product fails within a reasonable period.
 
 DABS responded today stating that it was not reasonable to expect an
 SB3 to be without fault after 36 months.
The problem is that the law is phrased in very vague terms, using
next-to-meaningless terms such as reasonable period. Who gets to
decide what that is? The way I read it, if something goes wrong after 3
years, it's up to the buyer to prove that it hasn't lasted for a
reasonable period. If the seller refuses to agree with you, you'll have
to take them to court. And then the only people who will win are the
lawyers.

FWIW, I think a solid state device like a Squeezebox can reasonably be
expected to last almost indefinitely once it gets beyond the infant
mortality period. But of course a court of law might not agree.


-- 
cliveb

Transporter - ATC SCM100A

cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread Gooner

Goodsounds;429322 Wrote: 
 Out of curiosity I scanned the linked material - Very interesting.
 
 I'm not a retailer, but I don't think a rule like that would work very
 well in the US. I'd be interested to know more about how it works in the
 UK.
 
 This would seem to really put sellers in a precarious position. Maybe
 that's why things always seem so expensive in the UK (and not just
 because of exchange rates and/or VAT). They would need to pay for such a
 long term guarantee some how, and maybe the high prices are the
 result.

I don't think many people were aware of the law so they never pursued
their rights.  

It was on the BBC1 news segement last week which brought it to my
attention.  This is big stuff.  It completely undermines the whole
extended warranty business!!

Like some people have reclaimed unlawful bank charges, it is feasible
that you could reclaim extended warranty costs if you could prove it was
missold.  I suspect a test case is just around the corner!!


-- 
Gooner

Gooner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5056
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread Gooner

cliveb;429331 Wrote: 
 The problem is that the law is phrased in very vague terms, using
 next-to-meaningless terms such as reasonable period. Who gets to
 decide what that is? The way I read it, if something goes wrong after 3
 years, it's up to the buyer to prove that it hasn't lasted for a
 reasonable period. If the seller refuses to agree with you, you'll have
 to take them to court. And then the only people who will win are the
 lawyers.
 
 FWIW, I think a solid state device like a Squeezebox can reasonably be
 expected to last almost indefinitely once it gets beyond the infant
 mortality period. But of course a court of law might not agree.

Totally agree with you except I'd hope it would be reasonably cheap to
go to the small claims court without a lawyer...  I'll have to look into
that.

Given that pretty much everyone here, who owns the product, agrees that
the unit should last more than 3 years, I have opinion on my side.  Who
decides what a reasonable amount of time is? Majority rule?


-- 
Gooner

Gooner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5056
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread nolesrule

Is it just me or does it seem unreasonable for a government to force a
retailer to guarantee a product for longer than the manufacturer
guarantees it?


-- 
nolesrule

nolesrule's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9429
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread Gooner

nolesrule;429347 Wrote: 
 Is it just me or does it seem unreasonable for a government to force a
 retailer to guarantee a product for longer than the manufacturer
 guarantees it?

For this purpose, no of course I don't!! :)


-- 
Gooner

Gooner's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5056
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread Goodsounds

nolesrule;429347 Wrote: 
 Is it just me or does it seem unreasonable for a government to force a
 retailer to guarantee a product for longer than the manufacturer
 guarantees it?

The law is whatever is enacted. We have a lot of laws that are puzzling
to some people too. How about the remnants of prohibition and the blue
laws that still exist in the US? Complete nonsense. 

American law tends to be a bit more hands-off and what may be described
as perhaps less paternal than what is found in Europe. There's a lot of
national legislation that is mandated by the EU (I don't know whether
the case for this or not, but no matter). We look that way and scratch
our heads over what they do and they look back at us and do the same
thing.


-- 
Goodsounds

Goodsounds's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14201
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread Peter
Gooner wrote:
 Hello everyone.

 I'm interested in views as to how many years I could expect a
 Squeezebox to function fault free.

 If you own one of these, could you let me know how long you've had it
 and whether it continues to work :)

 This is in relation to a dispute I'm having with DABS.COM

 All input greatly received.
   

Well, there's the bathtub curve:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathtub_curve

I have a SliMP3, an SB1, 4 SB3's and a Duet.
One of the 4 SB3's failed after six months, everything else is still 
humming nicely.

Regards,
Peter

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread Siduhe

Goodsounds;429351 Wrote: 
 The law is whatever is enacted. We have a lot of laws that are puzzling
 to some people too. How about the remnants of prohibition and the blue
 laws that still exist in the US? Complete nonsense. 
 
 American civil law tends to be a bit more hands-off and what may be
 described as perhaps less paternal than what is found in Europe. There's
 a lot of national legislation that is mandated by the EU (I don't know
 whether the case for this or not, but no matter). We look that way and
 scratch our heads over what they do and they look back at us and do the
 same thing.

The current version of the Sale of Goods Act was amended by the Sale
and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002, which implements an
EU Directive.  It may seem a bit odd, except of course that the free
movement of goods within the EU is a fundamental premise.  It makes
sense (at least to me) that if goods have to move freely for the benefit
of consumers then those consumers should be granted the same standard of
protection across those member states.  And the prior standard varied
greatly across member countries (from min of 1 year in the UK up to 10
years for certain types of goods in France and Germany, I believe).


-- 
Siduhe

Who am I on 'LAST.FM' (http://www.last.fm/user/siduhe)?
-Siduhe Loved Tracks radio got the thumbs up. Feedback included: yeah,
it's good... got the odd dodgy track tho...- (c) 'ModelCitizen'
(http://www.last.fm/user/Modelcitizen)
Oh yeah, I'm giving 'Twitter' (http://twitter.com/Siduhe) a try - and
surprising myself how many interesting people are out there...

Siduhe's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=723
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread toby10

cliveb;429331 Wrote: 
 The problem is that the law is phrased in very vague terms, using
 next-to-meaningless terms such as reasonable period. Who gets to
 decide what that is? The way I read it, if something goes wrong after 3
 years, it's up to the buyer to prove that it hasn't lasted for a
 reasonable period. If the seller refuses to agree with you, you'll have
 to take them to court. And then the only people who will win are the
 lawyers.
 
 FWIW, I think a solid state device like a Squeezebox can reasonably be
 expected to last almost indefinitely once it gets beyond the infant
 mortality period. But of course a court of law might not agree.

Yeah, I'd guess the vagueness is the gotcha.  If this is the way they
do it in GB/EU, why not just state the period the seller will honor this
consumer right of reasonable time.  i.e.  DABS will fix or replace
this unit for up to 4 years after the date of the sale (see details
below, BTW we sell magnifying glasses on page 117).  :)

30 days seems a drop in the bucket compared to this GB/EU law, but then
it's rather plain and indisputable at 30 days.  For me I get automatic
warranty extensions on such purchases via my credit card so my 2 year
SB3 warranty is really 3 years.


-- 
toby10

toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread Nonreality

Goodsounds;429322 Wrote: 
 Out of curiosity I scanned the linked material - Very interesting.
 
 I'm not a retailer, but I don't think a rule like that would work very
 well in the US. I'd be interested to know more about how it works in the
 UK.
 
 This would seem to really put sellers in a precarious position. Maybe
 that's why things always seem so expensive in the UK (and not just
 because of exchange rates and/or VAT). They would need to pay for such a
 long term guarantee some how, and maybe the high prices are the
 result.

Exactly what I was thinking.  Really puts retailers in a difficult
position as they may have to cover many things that a manufacturer would
normally doe.  Manufacturers plan for warranty costs, retailers really
don't.


-- 
Nonreality

-IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE RULE.-

HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality

Nonreality's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15723
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread MrSinatra

i think i got my SB2 in oct 05.  so far still works.


-- 
MrSinatra

www.lion-radio.org
using:
sb2  sbc (my home) / sbr (parent's home) - w/sc 7.3.3b - win xp pro
sp3 ie8 - 3.2ghz / 2gig ram - 1tb wd usb2 raid1 - d-link dir-655

MrSinatra's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2336
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread iPhone

Gooner;429335 Wrote: 
 Totally agree with you except I'd hope it would be reasonably cheap to
 go to the small claims court without a lawyer...  I'll have to look into
 that.
 
 Given that pretty much everyone here, who owns the product, agrees that
 the unit should last more than 3 years, I have opinion on my side.  Who
 decides what a reasonable amount of time is? Majority rule?
 

This is nuts. It's an electronic device. It lasted longer then the
warranty. Suck it up, help out the world economy and buy a new SB3. Your
probably going to lose in court. The SB3 has not been around long enough
to create fair established expectancy. It lasted over twice as long as
they have been out.

Europe wants it all. The lowest price and if it fails after the
warranty but before I think it should I want a free one. At the most if
the law even made a little sense you should only receive fair market
value for a 3 year old used SB3. Did I mention it's electronics.

A cap or regulator could have failed and that's why it's called
Consumer Electronics.


-- 
iPhone

*iPhone*   
Media Room:
Transporter, VTL TL-6.5 Signature Pre-Amp, Ayre MX-R Mono's,
Vandersteen Quatro, VeraStarr 6.4SE 6-channel Amp, VCC-5 Reference
Center, four VSM-1 Signatures, Runco RS 900 CineWide AutoScope 2.35:1  


Living Room:
Duet, ADCOM GTP-870HD, Cinepro 3K6SE III Gold, Vandersteen Model 3A
Signature, Two 2Wq subs, VCC-2, Two VSM-1  

Kitchen: Squeezebox BOOM
Bedroom: SB3, GFR-700HD, Thiel 2.3, Second Boom
Home Office: SB3, NAD C370, two VSM-1
Home Gym: SB3, Parasound Vamp v.3, Thiel PowerPoint 1.2
House Portable: SB3, Audioengine A5
Thunderbird: Duet, Mac Mini
Expedition: SB3, ToughBook

iPhone's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13622
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss


Re: [slim] Product Longevity

2009-06-04 Thread seanadams

This whole thing makes no sense to me. A sane law might say that the
dealer should expected to cover the product during the period where it
is likely to fail. But what we're all telling you is that after a year
or so it is very UNlikely to fail. 

So I hardly see how it's fair that a retailer, who if they're doing
well has collected perhaps 20-30% on the whole deal, should be liable
for the full value of the product ages after they've sold it. 

In other words, this is an unreasonable law if it's really as you're
interpreting it. And I have no skin in the game here, just saying.

If the UK really wants this kind of coverage built in to every product
that is sold there, then people are effectively saying they want to be
forcibly charged for an extended warranty with every purchase -
because that's the only way that this policy could be sustained.


-- 
seanadams

seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=64114

___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss