שלום עומר.
אכן, לכל אחד סגנון המתאים לצרכיו, אבל נגזר גם מההיצע של המידע.
נכון, תמלול של הרצאות, הוא דבר טוב, מהרבה סיבות.
נכון, הכל סביב הקוד הפתוח שהוא הנושא שעמותת המקור שואפת לשפר.
נכון, זה יפה שאנשים מתנדבים על מנת לקדם את הגישה של אנשים עם מוגבלויות
לקוד הפתוח.
כל זה, בהקשר של היקף ה
שלום רם-און,
מכתב זה לא נכתב בלשון דיפלומטית בלשון המעטה.
אני בהחלט לא מסכים איתך.
לדעתי תמלול של הרצאות מסוימות זו משימה חשובה ביותר.
יש כמובן הרצאות, שהתמלול שלהן אינו באותה דרגת חשיבות.
אבל הרצאות כמו זו של RMS או זו של Larry Wall הן חשובות לתמלול, כי לעתים
הן מביאות תובנות חדשות, שלא יזכו לפר
שלום רם-און,
קודם כל, וזה הדבר החשוב ביותר:
כל אחד לומד בסגנון אישי המותאם לו.
יש אנשים שמתאים להם ללכת להרצאות. יש אנשים שמתאים להם ללמוד לבד מספרים.
ויש אנשים שמתאים להם לפתח את הכל בראש שלהם וצריכים רק לקבל רמזים
(הפיסיקאי זוכה פרס הנובל ריצ'רד פיינמן הוא דוגמא לאדם מהסוג השלישי).
ובפרט, נובע מ
שלום עומר וכולם.
אני אישית לא בטוח בתועלת של דיבוב הרצאה. עד כמה שאני מבין, הרצאה היא
למעשה סיכום של מאמר עם היכולת להרחיב בהתאם לדרישות הקהל.
אני חושב שהערך של השאלות הנשאלות במהלך הרצאה לא בהכרח שווה את היקף
המשאבים הנדרש כדי לבצע את הדיבוב.
כאשר אני נדרשתי לחומר מהרצאות, הפקתי תועלת רבה מ
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 12:51 +0200, Ofir Carny wrote:
> I think transcribing is important, not only for human accessibility
> purposes, but also for software accessibility (e.g. translation
> services, web crawlers) which adds a lot of functionality. And I think
> that any software that can ease th
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 02:01:46PM +0200, Omer Zak wrote:
> However, introduction of audio recordings, without immediately
> accompanying them with textual transcripts, has the effect of
> disfranchising me and other deaf software developers, making us less
> human, less valuable than you hearies.
Omer, it sounds to me like the only objection is to the question of
motivation. I don't think anybody will mind if the software that helps
transcription merely exists and is usable by whoever may want to
contribute by using it. Then if there are good enough reasons for it to
happen, it can.
I
Forwarded Message
From: Dov Grobgeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Omer Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Recording the Lecture [was Re: Date Correction [was Re:
Telux:"Linux Kernel Tuning and Customisation" on 26 March]]
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 00:10:17 +0200
H
Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006, Omer Zak wrote about "Re: Recording the Lecture [was Re: Date Correction
[was Re: Telux: "Linux Kernel Tuning and Customisation" on 26 March]]":
4. Maybe there is another solution of which I did not think?
The best
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 19:33 +0200, Alon Altman wrote:
>I fully agree with Orna on this. This is against the FOSS spirit. If at
> all, the government should be supplying the deaf with the tools to
> transcribe audio when needed (in the US they do via "relay calls"). A free
> software approach to
I fully agree with Orna on this. This is against the FOSS spirit. If at
all, the government should be supplying the deaf with the tools to
transcribe audio when needed (in the US they do via "relay calls"). A free
software approach to this issue would be similar to what project guntenberg
uses
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 18:27 +0200, Orna Agmon wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Omer Zak wrote:
>
> > 2. Money to pay for paid work transcribing lectures: from where will
> > the budget come? If there are more lectures than budget, how to select
> > which lectures to transcribe?
> >
> > 3. The solut
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Omer Zak wrote:
> 2. Money to pay for paid work transcribing lectures: from where will
> the budget come? If there are more lectures than budget, how to select
> which lectures to transcribe?
>
> 3. The solution which I suggest is as follows:
> After the lecture is recorded,
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 16:12 +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 02:01:46PM +0200, Omer Zak wrote:
> > However, introduction of audio recordings, without immediately
> > accompanying them with textual transcripts, has the effect of
> > disfranchising me and other deaf softw
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 17:10 +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2006, Omer Zak wrote about "Re: Recording the Lecture [was
> Re: Date Correction [was Re: Telux: "Linux Kernel Tuning and Customisation"
> on 26 March]]":
> > Why should I give u
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006, Omer Zak wrote about "Re: Recording the Lecture [was Re:
Date Correction [was Re: Telux: "Linux Kernel Tuning and Customisation" on 26
March]]":
> Why should I give up my own life and spend a lot of time on those
> recordings, if the mechanism whic
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 15:39 +0200, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2006, Omer Zak wrote about "Re: Recording the Lecture [was
> Re: Date Correction [was Re: Telux: "Linux Kernel Tuning and Customisation"
> on 26 March]]":
> > However, introduction
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006, Omer Zak wrote about "Re: Recording the Lecture [was Re:
Date Correction [was Re: Telux: "Linux Kernel Tuning and Customisation" on 26
March]]":
> However, introduction of audio recordings, without immediately
> accompanying them with textual tran
I would like to share with you my feelings about the planned lecture's
audio recording.
>From the fact that the volunteer work on textual transcript of Larry
Wall's lecture
(http://wiki.osdc.org.il/index.php/Larry_Wall_-_Present_Continous%
2C_Future_Perfect) was not finished so far, I understand th
19 matches
Mail list logo
