Hi Dino,
> -Original Message-
> From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:farina...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 4:35 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L <fred.l.temp...@boeing.com>
> Cc: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <sgund...@cisco.com>; i...@ietf.org; dmm
> <
Hi Dino,
> -Original Message-
> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dino Farinacci
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2018 3:38 PM
> To: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
> Cc: i...@ietf.org; dmm
> Subject: Re: [DMM] [Ila] Fwd: New Version
Hi Sri,
AERO needs also be mentioned as a tunneling option.
Thanks - Fred
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 9:50 AM
To: sarik...@ieee.org
Cc: dmm ; i...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] [Ila] [E] Re: Fwd:
Hi, please add AERO to the list:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-aerolink/
AERO does IPv6 ND over tunnels, and supports mobility via dynamic
neighbor cache updates the same as any IPv6 link. Use cases include
(but are not limited to):
- Enterprise mobile devices (cellphones,
Hello,
Yesterday (03/30/2017) I presented "A Simple BGP-based Mobile Routing System
for the Aeronautical Telecommunications Network" at the IETF98 rtgwg session.
I also presented the document at the Distributed Mobility Management (DMM)
session earlier in the week. Both presentations resulted in
for the future air traffic management service for worldwide
civil aviation and therefore would benefit from community input.
Thanks - Fred
fred.l.temp...@boeing.com
-Original Message-
From: ietf [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Templin, Fred L
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 9:15 AM
, Fred L
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 11:21 PM
To: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: [DMM] Comment on draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility
Hi,
Section 3.1 of this document says:
If a client receives an IA Address option from a server with the IPv6
Continuity Service option in the IAaddr
server can authenticate using the
public key and therefore defeat any spoofing.
Thanks - Fred
fred.l.temp...@boeing.com
From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 11:08 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Charlie Perkins; jouni korhonen; dmm@ietf.org; Charlie
Hi Brian,
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Haberman
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:37 AM
To: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] RFC4283bis progress..
Hi Fred,
On 7/14/15 10:54 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
Hi Sri,
Reason
Hi Brian,
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Haberman
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 11:31 AM
To: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] RFC4283bis progress..
On 7/14/15 12:19 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
Hi Brian,
-Original Message
Hi, I would like to suggest one additional identifier before publication:
X.509 certificate as per Section 5.2 of Secure DHCPv6:
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-08.txt
Thanks - Fred
fred.l.temp...@boeing.com
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Perkins
Hi,
Just to mention, AERO supports any combination of IPv4 or IPv6 in the
anchoring network via IP*-in-IP* tunneling. The current implementation
provides mobiles with IPv6 prefixes but tunnels over an IPv4 access
network and mobility anchors.
Thanks – Fred
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 8:53 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Tony Hain; 'Jouni Korhonen'; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Hi Fred,
Le 12/06/2015 17
Petrescu wrote:
Le 11/06/2015 18:02, Jouni Korhonen a écrit :
6/4/2015, 7:08 AM, Alexandru Petrescu kirjoitti:
Le 04/06/2015 05:42, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 7:58 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Fred,
Le 08/06/2015 19:08, Templin, Fred
Hi,
I finally had a chance to sit back and think about the scaling properties of
AERO,
and I think it is within reason for each AERO link to service O(10^9) Clients.
Here
is what I wrote in the latest AERO draft version:
Scaling properties of the AERO routing system are therefore limited
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 9:43 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Hi Fred,
Le 04/06/2015 17:10, Templin
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 7:09 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 04/06/2015 05:42, Templin, Fred L
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2015 8:36 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 29/05/2015 20:21, Templin, Fred L
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:59 AM
To: Satoru Matsushima
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
Le 29/05/2015 15:30, Satoru Matsushima a écrit :
Ah
Hi Brian,
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Haberman
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 6:45 AM
To: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] Mobility Exposure and Selection WT call
On 4/22/15 12:51 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
Hi Alex
Hi Jouni,
It seems there is interest in the AERO address format and its relation to
the AERO link and the AERO routing system. I would like to therefore
request a 10min slot to discuss just this aspect of AERO so that everyone
has a clear understanding of this relationship.
Thanks - Fred
Hi Brian,
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Haberman
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 9:22 AM
To: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] Mobility Exposure and Selection WT call
On 4/27/15 11:53 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
So
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 5:21 AM
To: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] AERO as DMM working group item
Le 17/04/2015 18:27, Templin, Fred L a écrit :
Hello,
I would like
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 1:27 AM
To: sarik...@ieee.org
Cc: sofiane.imad...@gmail.com; Basavaraj Patil; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption:
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 9:36 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Jouni Korhonen; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] Mobility Exposure and Selection WT call
Hi Fred,
Le 22/04/2015 19:22, Templin
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:alexandru.petre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 9:59 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Jouni Korhonen; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] Mobility Exposure and Selection WT call
Le 22/04/2015 18:51, Templin, Fred L
Hi Danny and Alper,
In this draft, you seem to be considering only DHCPv6 address delegation for
when the node is acting as a mobile host. I am wondering if there are similar
considerations for DHCPv6 prefix delegation for when the node is acting as
a mobile router.
But then, I wonder whether
Hi Anthony,
What you are describing is well addressed by AERO. AERO also addresses
some gaps listed in RFC7429 better than other approaches, and IMHO has
a much cleaner mobility architecture. Please include AERO in your list.
Thanks – Fred
fred.l.temp...@boeing.com
From: dmm
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 9:42 AM
To: Alexandru Petrescu
Cc: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] offlisted mails - names of Work Teams
On Oct 29, 2014, at 4:56 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
Hi Behcet,
-Original Message-
From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 11:16 AM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] AERO and Mobile IP comparison
Hi Fred,
I think your draft is now Rev. 44 at
https
Hi Jouni and Dapeng,
I would like to request a 20min slot to discuss aspects of AERO that have not
been
covered during the interim calls. Aspects include:
1) DHCPv6 Service Model and IPv6 link-local address forming
2) IPv6 Neighbor Discovery mobility signaling
3) AERO mobility scenarios
Hi Behcet,
-Original Message-
From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 9:11 AM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: Jouni Korhonen; dmm@ietf.org; Dapeng Liu
Subject: Re: [DMM] Agenda building for IETF 91
Hi Fred,
I will make comments on your
FWIW, AERO is a mobile router solution. But, it is easy to make an AERO mobile
router
act like a mobile host. Cell phones, tablets, laptops, etc. are all good
candidate AERO
mobile router/hosts. (Airplanes, automobiles, ocean-going vessels, etc. are
also good
candidate AERO mobile routers.)
Hi,
During the call today, there was interest expressed in having a discussion on
the
differences between AERO and Mobile IP. In the interest of getting the
discussion
going, I will just say the following for now:
- the mobility archetype for Mobile IP is that of a mobile host that wanders
Hi Charlie,
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Perkins [mailto:charles.perk...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 11:16 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] AERO and Mobile IP comparison
Hello Fred,
One comment:
On 10/7/2014 11:08 AM, Templin
Hi Charlie,
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Perkins [mailto:charles.perk...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 1:25 PM
To: Templin, Fred L; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] AERO and Mobile IP comparison
Hello Fred,
A few little follow-up questions...
On 10/7/2014
Hi Behcet,
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Behcet Sarikaya
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 12:22 PM
To: Brian Haberman
Cc: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] Going forward with the DMM work items
Hi Brian,
You deleted maybe by mistake the
Hi Charlie,
I am interested in node IDs that can be represented in a DHCPv6 DUID. There is
RFC6355 which encodes a node ID based on DUID-UUID (Universally Unique
IDentifier). AFAICT, the UUID is a 128-bit container formatted per RFC4122
specifications that includes a time portion and a node ID
...@computer.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 2:08 PM
To: Templin, Fred L; Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Cc: Vijay Devarapalli; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] MNID Types
Hello Fred,
I can include DUID-UUID as an identifier type, and cite RFC 4122. Is this
sufficient, or do I need to also do
Hi Sri,
I remember the nested NEMO discussions, but at least for mobile network
use-cases I have not seen any real deployment use-cases for that
requirement. But, it will be good to have some discussions on that topic.
I am thinking about the case when a mobile router A provides an access
Hi Sri,
I will make this even easier and reduce it to a single question:
1) How big??
Thanks - Fred
fred.l.temp...@boeing.com
-Original Message-
From: Templin, Fred L
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 8:51 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Sri Gundavelli (sgundave); dmm@ietf.org
Subject
1) How big??
Still no answer. I guess then we will have to assume 64KB.
Anything larger than that will have to go as a jumbogram.
Thanks - Fred
fred.l.temp...@boeing.com
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Templin, Fred L
Sent: Tuesday
Hi Sri,
-Original Message-
From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 4:06 PM
To: Templin, Fred L; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Signaling Message Fragmentation
Hi Fred,
Thanks for your response and also sorry for the delay
Hi Sri,
-Original Message-
From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 4:19 PM
To: Templin, Fred L; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Signaling Message Fragmentation
Hi Fred,
inline ..
On 9/23/14 4:14 PM, Templin, Fred L fred.l.temp
Hi Sri,
My understanding is that if a source sends fragmented messages it must have
assurance
that the destination has a large enough reassembly buffer. Since the minimum
IPv6
reassembly unit is only 1500 bytes, the source SHOULD NOT send fragmented
packets
larger than 1500 bytes unless there
Hi Sri,
-Original Message-
From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 5:47 PM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] DMM Interim call #2 - agenda forming
Hi Fred,
This looks very close to the way AERO
Hi Sri,
-Original Message-
From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 7:02 PM
To: Templin, Fred L; Jouni Korhonen; sarik...@ieee.org
Cc: Dapeng Liu; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] DMM Interim call #2 - agenda forming
Hi Fred
Hi Sri,
-Original Message-
From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 3:32 PM
To: Templin, Fred L; Jouni Korhonen; sarik...@ieee.org
Cc: Dapeng Liu; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] DMM Interim call #2 - agenda forming
Hi Fred
Hi Sri,
-Original Message-
From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:59 PM
To: Templin, Fred L; Jouni Korhonen; sarik...@ieee.org
Cc: Dapeng Liu; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] DMM Interim call #2 - agenda forming
Hi Fred
Hi Behcet,
-Original Message-
From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 9:33 AM
To: Alexandru Petrescu
Cc: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave); Templin, Fred L; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] A Day in the Life of an Enterprise Mobile Device User
Hi Sri,
-Original Message-
From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 2:51 PM
To: Templin, Fred L; Jouni Korhonen; sarik...@ieee.org
Cc: Dapeng Liu; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] DMM Interim call #2 - agenda forming
Hi Fred
Hi Jouni,
I'd like to propose a slightly different charter:
AERO already solves distributed mobility management and provides a
a comprehensive mobility solution for any mobile device. AERO should
therefore be approved as the mobility management solution for DMM.
Publication of AERO
Hi Jouni,
-Original Message-
From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:jouni.nos...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 12:13 PM
To: Templin, Fred L; sarik...@ieee.org
Cc: Dapeng Liu; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] DMM Interim call #2 - agenda forming
Fred,
We'll prioritize
be realized
by simply placing an AERO Server in the network and using AERO?
Thanks - Fred
fred.l.temp...@boeing.com
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Templin, Fred L
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 7:51 AM
To: Alexandru Petrescu; dmm
Hi Behcet and Sri,
-Original Message-
From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 3:15 PM
To: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Cc: Templin, Fred L; Jouni Korhonen; Dapeng Liu; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] DMM Interim call #2 - agenda forming
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 1:46 PM
To: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: [DMM] A need for further interim calls?
Folks,
Just asking whether you are willing to have additional interim calls in
fred.l.temp...@boeing.com
Alex
Alper
On Sep 3, 2014, at 7:37 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
Hi,
The specific passage from the new draft that I wanted the wg to
see is the following (with references to AERO removed). Please
review and send questions or comments.
Thanks - Fred
Hi,
Back on June 11, the following text was dropped from the draft charter:
However, mobility management in a limited area, such as within an
autonomous system, is not strictly limited to mentioned IP mobility
protocols but can be any existing or a new protocol solution enabling
the
OK, I see it now. thanks.
Fred
-Original Message-
From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:jouni.nos...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 10:38 PM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] regarding the re-chartering..
https://github.com/jounikor/dmm-re-charter
8
So, in lines 27-30 of the current draft charter, it says:
5213, RFC 5844, RFC , RFC 5568, and RFC 6275) as well as new
approaches which capitalize on other protocols specified by the IETF.
When extending protocols that are not based on Mobile IP, DMM solutions
will be have to be
Hi Jouni,
Is the draft charter under some sort of version control, or are
the previous versions gone for good?
Thanks - Fred
fred.l.temp...@boeing.com
___
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Hi Behcet,
-Original Message-
From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 8:31 AM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave); Brian Haberman; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github..
Hi Fred,
Thanks
, the use case is not satisfied.
Thanks - Fred
fred.l.temp...@boeing.com
Regards
Sri
On 6/18/14 8:43 AM, Brian Haberman br...@innovationslab.net wrote:
Hi Fred,
On 6/18/14 11:25 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
Hi Jouni,
-Original Message-
From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:jouni.nos
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Templin, Fred L
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 11:30 AM
To: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave); Brian Haberman; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github..
Hi Sri,
-Original Message-
From
: Thursday, June 19, 2014 12:33 PM
To: Templin, Fred L; Brian Haberman; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github..
Hi Fred,
The DMM WG is still discussing PS and the related issues. By the time we
adopt a solution and complete the work, we will surely be in 2016. So
Hi Sri,
-Original Message-
From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 1:32 PM
To: Templin, Fred L; Brian Haberman; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github..
Hi Fred,
Ack on the AERO capability.
OK.
I
Hi Sri,
-Original Message-
From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 1:40 PM
To: Templin, Fred L; Brian Haberman; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github..
Hi Fred,
Or, have IPv4 built-in from
Hi Behcet,
-Original Message-
From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 2:08 PM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave); Brian Haberman; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github..
Isn't AERO becoming
Hi Behcet,
-Original Message-
From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 3:57 PM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave); Brian Haberman; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github..
I thought you said
Hi Jouni,
-Original Message-
From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:jouni.nos...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 3:00 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github..
Fred,
It is true IPv4 is there (and will be for a long time
Hi Jouni,
-Original Message-
From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:jouni.nos...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 9:41 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] draft charter text updates in github..
Fred,
6/16/2014 5:59 PM, Templin, Fred L kirjoitti:
Hi Jouni
Hi Alper,
Thank you for hosting the call, and thanks to Ryuji for presenting. In his
talk, Ryuji
cited the Connection by Boeing experience where injection and withdrawal of
mobile network prefixes into the global BGP routing tables caused excessive
churn
and instability. We avoided those issues
Hi Jouni,
-Original Message-
From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:jouni.nos...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 8:41 AM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] rechartering draft text updated
I hear you.. but this is what the original charter already said.
We
Hi Jouni,
-Original Message-
From: Jouni Korhonen [mailto:jouni.nos...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 9:04 PM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: dmm@ietf.org; dmm-cha...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] DMM WG next steps
Fred,
On Mar 11, 2014, at 11:48 PM, Templin, Fred L
75 matches
Mail list logo