> It seems building SCT is supported with edk2 UDK2017 and not something
SCT build fails on UDK2017 as well
Below is patch suggested by Supreet with UDK2017
tmp/sct_workspace/edk2$ git diff
diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/Makefiles/app.makefile
b/BaseTools/Source/C/Makefiles/app.makefile
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 6:40 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel ; Leif Lindholm
> ; Sami Mujawar ; Thomas
> Panakamattam Abraham ; Meenakshi Aggarwal
> ; Udit Kumar ; Matteo
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 6:40 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel ; Leif Lindholm
> ; Sami Mujawar ; Thomas
> Panakamattam Abraham ; Meenakshi Aggarwal
> ; Udit Kumar ; Matteo
>
> > > > Coming back to hardware, which does not have mask around wdt, how
> > > > to implement this feature.
> > >
> > > Simple - you can't.
> > >
> > > You can absolutely implement exactly the functionality you have
> > > today, with minimal changes to the protocol - it just should not be
> > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Leif Lindholm
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 2:56 PM
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 05:20:59AM +0000, Udit Kumar wrote:
> > Thanks for note Leif,
> >
> > I am trying to understand this behavior of specification.
tam Abraham
Cc: Meenakshi Aggarwal ; Udit Kumar
; Ard Biesheuvel ; edk2-devel
(edk2-devel@lists.01.org) ; Ming Huang
; Heyi Guo ; Matteo Carlini
; Nariman Poushin
Subject: SP805 driver
Hi Sami, Thomas, (and others on cc)
NXP are upstreaming a set containing an implementation of
EFI_WATCHDOG_TIM
Hi Ard
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel
> Sent: Monday, December 3, 2018 7:35 PM
> To: Laszlo Ersek
> Cc: Udit Kumar ; Andrew Fish ; Leif
> Lindholm ; Ruiyu Ni ; edk2-
> de...@lists.01.org; Zeng, Star
> Subject: Re: [edk2] Help on boot manager 'Boot
Sent: Monday, December 3, 2018 3:27 PM
> To: Udit Kumar ; af...@apple.com
> Cc: Ni, Ruiyu ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Zeng, Star
>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] Help on boot manager 'Boot Manager Menu' and direct boot
>
> On 11/30/18 10:13, Udit Kumar wrote:
> > Thanks Laszlo/And
on boot-loader to enable this bit.
Regards
Udit
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 11:31 PM
> To: Udit Kumar ; af...@apple.com
> Cc: Ni, Ruiyu ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Zeng, Star
>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] Help on boot manag
Thanks Laszlo,
> I can only think of some terminal control sequences that are *not* printed to
> the terminal when you don't enter UiApp manually. I don't understand how that
> could cause the exact symptom you describe, but I have no better explanation.
>
> Can you try other serial
.
FYI,
Both user space and kernel space are on same kermit session
Regards
Udit
> -Original Message-
> From: af...@apple.com
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 7:22 AM
> To: Udit Kumar
> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Ni, Ruiyu ; Zeng, Star
>
> Subject: Re: [edk2]
Hi ,
I am looking for information/Help. If UEFI passed different information to OS,
in below boot path
1. Enter into Setup menu (By pressing Esc key), On display of UiApp.efi on
console, select device to boot OS
2. Let the boot OS without user intervention from same device as of 1
I
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel On Behalf Of
> Vijayenthiran Subramaniam
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 4:10 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; siyuan...@intel.com; jiaxin...@intel.com
> Cc: Vijayenthiran Subramaniam
> Subject: [edk2] [PATCH] NetworkPkg/IScsiDxe: add debug
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel On Behalf Of Haojian
> Zhuang
> Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2018 8:16 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: [edk2] [PATCH v1 edk-platforms 1/2] Platform/HiKey960: add
> PL011UartClockLib
>
> Since PL011UartClockLib is required by PL011
dYkb%2F
> 8LzQXtJ
> > > WjlKjIsBoG1QHjxVvTIlV8k%3Dreserved=0
> > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Matteo
> > > >
> > > > [1]:
> > > >
> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
> > > >
> Fco
Hi Ard
> If MM mode is fundamentally incompatible with OP-TEE, then you cannot
> run both at the same time,
Both cannot coexist unless you have v8.4 CPU
Regards
Udit
>
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: edk2-devel On Behalf Of Sumit
> >> Garg
> >> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018
Hi Sumit
What use case you have in mind, to interface op-tee with UEFI.
What ARM proposed (Matteo in cc), to run MM mode in Secure side of machine with
SPM.
Moreover SPD (OP-TEE) and SPM(MM mode) cannot co-exists on current arm devices.
Then how do you see MM mode working.
Regards
Udit
>
Thanks Jiewen
> -Original Message-
> From: Yao, Jiewen [mailto:jiewen@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2018 6:24 PM
> To: Udit Kumar ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Sumit Batra
> Subject: RE: Tool to check memory leaks
>
> Please r
Hi All
Is there some tool/debug option in edk2 to detect memory leak.
Thanks
Udit
___
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
t probably you
> need to execute FpgaInterfaceInit() earlier in platform code or fork
> SerialPortLib
> for now.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Marvin
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: edk2-devel On Behalf Of Udit
> >> Kumar
> >> Sent: Thursd
Hi Experts,
How I can change the order of initialization in Constructor list of autogen
file.
In my build system, if I look at
MdeModulePkg/Universal/PCD/Pei/Pcd/DEBUG/AutoGen.c
Below is function of Library Constructor List
VOID
EFIAPI
ProcessLibraryConstructorList (
IN
This patch include default implementation of PL011
clock lib
[v3]
Update in HiSilicon common dsc
[v2]
Updated name of clock lib
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Meenakshi Aggarwal
---
Platform/AMD/OverdriveBoard/OverdriveBoard.dsc | 1 +
[v3]
Incorporated review comments of v2
[v2]
Incorporated review comments of v1
Udit Kumar (2):
ArmPlatformPkg: PL011 Dynamic clock freq Support
ArmPlatformPkg: Include PL011UartClock Lib
ArmPlatformPkg/ArmPlatformPkg.dec | 1 +
ArmPlatformPkg/ArmPlatformPkg.dsc
is using Pcd.
Platform which needs dynamic clocking needs implement
PL011UartClockLib
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar
---
ArmPlatformPkg/ArmPlatformPkg.dec | 1 +
ArmPlatformPkg/ArmPlatformPkg.dsc | 1
This patch gets PL011 baud rate clock from
pl011 uart clock lib instead of Pcd.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar
---
ArmPlatformPkg/Library/PL011SerialPortLib/PL011SerialPortLib.c | 5 +++--
ArmPlatformPkg/Library/PL011SerialPortLib
Thanks for review Ard.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 3:35 PM
> To: Udit Kumar
> Cc: Leif Lindholm ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ArmPlatformPkg: PL011 Dynamic cl
Thanks Ard
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 3:37 PM
> To: Udit Kumar
> Cc: Leif Lindholm ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ArmPlatformPkg: Include PL011UartClock Lib
>
&
[v2]
Updated name of clock lib
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Meenakshi Aggarwal
---
Platform/AMD/OverdriveBoard/OverdriveBoard.dsc | 1 +
Platform/ARM/VExpressPkg/ArmVExpress.dsc.inc | 1 +
Platform/Hisilicon/D05/D05.dsc
is using Pcd.
Platform which needs dynamic clocking needs implement
PL011UartClockLib
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar
---
ArmPlatformPkg/ArmPlatformPkg.dec | 1 +
ArmPlatformPkg/Include/Library/PL011UartClockLib.h | 32
[v2]
Incorporated review comments of v1
Udit Kumar (2):
ArmPlatformPkg: PL011 Dynamic clock freq Support
ArmPlatformPkg: Include PL011UartClock Lib
ArmPlatformPkg/ArmPlatformPkg.dec | 1 +
ArmPlatformPkg/Include/Library/PL011UartClockLib.h | 32
This patch includes, PL011UartClock lib.
In case of no implemenation of this Clock Lib,
Pcd value will be used for PL011 frequency.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar
---
ArmPlatformPkg/Library/PL011SerialPortLib/PL011SerialPortLib.c | 5
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexei Fedorov [mailto:alexei.fedo...@arm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 6:01 PM
> To: Udit Kumar ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
> ard.biesheu...@linaro.org; leif.lindh...@linaro.org
> Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH 1/2] ArmPlatformPkg: PL011
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 5:56 PM
> To: Udit Kumar
> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Leif Lindholm
> Subject: Re: [edk2][PATCH 1/2] ArmPlatformPkg: PL011 Dynamic clock freq
> Suppor
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 5:54 PM
> To: Udit Kumar
> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Leif Lindholm
> Subject: Re: [edk2][PATCH 1/2] ArmPlatformPkg: PL011 Dynamic clock freq
> Suppor
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Meenakshi Aggarwal
---
Platform/AMD/OverdriveBoard/OverdriveBoard.dsc | 1 +
Platform/ARM/VExpressPkg/ArmVExpress.dsc.inc | 1 +
Platform/Hisilicon/D05/D05.dsc | 2
for such platform where
Pcd clock frequency to PL011 can change
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar
---
.../Include/Library/ArmPlatformClockLib.h | 32
.../ArmPlatformClockLib.inf| 33
This patch includes, ArmPlatformClock in PL011 lib.
In case of NULL implemenation of Clock Lib, Pcd
value will be used for PL011 frequency.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar
---
ArmPlatformPkg/Library/PL011SerialPortLib/PL011SerialPortLib.c | 7
Hi Supreeth,
One question on this patch
We are asking permission on base-address and changing the permission of
memory based upon base and size.
I haven't looked at other part of code which manage this ,
But will there be possibility that, base address is given correctly and length
may
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Supreeth Venkatesh
> Sent: Saturday, May 5, 2018 2:11 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: ard.biesheu...@linaro.org; leif.lindh...@linaro.org; jiewen@intel.com;
> liming@intel.com;
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Supreeth Venkatesh
> Sent: Saturday, May 5, 2018 2:11 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: ard.biesheu...@linaro.org; leif.lindh...@linaro.org; jiewen@intel.com;
> liming@intel.com;
Hi Laszlo
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 3:12 PM
> To: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>; Leif Lindholm
> <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com
Hi Laszlo,
Considering all possible option is best to have in code
But IMO, We are running UEFI on LE CPU only, Not sure someone is running on BE.
AFAIK even specs says LE.
> (c) assuming we introduce a CPU with BE byte order, the same driver
> source will work (for both LE and BE
Hi Mike,
Do we want to support BE CPUs, ?
If yes then Last discussion of Lazlo is valid, where driver don't need to take
care of CPU endianness.
Regards
Udit
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Kinney, Michael D
> Sent:
d.kin...@intel.com>; Liming Gao
> <liming@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>; Udit Kumar
> <udit.ku...@nxp.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] MdePkg: add big-endian MMIO BaseBeIoLib
>
> When performing MMIO to a destination of the opposite endianness to the
, Suggested approach is ok as well to keep CPU endianness in ARM package.
but need views from Ard/Leif here.
Thanks
Udit
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 4:17 PM
> To: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com&
Hi Laszlo
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 4:29 PM
> To: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>; Pankaj Bansal
> <pankaj.ban...@nxp.com>; Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>
> Cc: mi
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Laszlo Ersek
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 2:51 PM
> To: Pankaj Bansal ; Leif Lindholm
>
> Cc: michael.d.kin...@intel.com;
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Laszlo Ersek
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 7:26 PM
> To: Leif Lindholm
> Cc: michael.d.kin...@intel.com; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
> ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
>
el.com>; Liming Gao <liming@intel.com>;
> Meenakshi Aggarwal <meenakshi.aggar...@nxp.com>; Udit Kumar
> <udit.ku...@nxp.com>; Varun Sethi <v.se...@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] MdePkg: add byte-swapping MMIO BaseIoLibSwap
>
> On 21 February 2018 at 15:25,
> -Original Message-
> From: Leif Lindholm [mailto:leif.lindh...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 9:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH edk2-platforms 01/39] Silicon/NXP: Add support for Big
> Endian Mmio APIs
>
> Apologies for dropping the ball on this series during my
Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>
---
ArmPlatformPkg/PrePi/AArch64/ModuleEntryPoint.S | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/ArmPlatformPkg/PrePi/AArch64/ModuleEntryPoint.S
b/ArmPlatformPkg/PrePi/AArch64/ModuleEntryPoint.S
index a81709d..d391fc1
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 3:23 PM
> To: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>
> Cc: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com>; Meenakshi Aggarwal
> <meenakshi.aggar...@nxp.com>;
Hi Ruiyu,
> -Original Message-
> >
> > And this change will not impact any other hardware so no one is basically
> impacted by this change.
>
> Your buggy HW only need the value zero. But the addition of PCD exposes
> an interface that can use any size of PRD.
> I am not sure the
dimir.olovyanni...@broadcom.com; Udit
> Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>; Meenakshi Aggarwal
> <meenakshi.aggar...@nxp.com>; Ard Biesheuvel
> <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> Subject: [PATCH] ArmPlatformPkg/MemoryInitPeiLib: mark primary FV region
> as boot services data
>
>
we can remove the special handling of the primary FV, which needed to
> be reserved so that DXE core could call into the PE/COFF and LZMA
> libraries in the PrePi module.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar &l
age-
> From: Carsey, Jaben [mailto:jaben.car...@intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2017 10:54 PM
> To: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: RE: [edk2] Documentation on "dh" shell command
>
> Udit,
>
> There are
Hi,
Could you help me, where I can get documentation on output of dh shell command.
UEFI_Shell_Spec_2_2.pdf , table 18 is giving details of sfo option only for
each column.
Thanks
Udit
___
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
ao, Liming <liming....@intel.com>
> Cc: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>; Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Meenakshi Aggarwal
> <meenakshi.aggar...@nxp.com>; ard.biesheu...@linaro.org; edk2-
> de...@lists.01.org; Varun Sethi <v.se...@nxp.com>
> Subjec
Original Message-
> From: Gao, Liming [mailto:liming@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2017 12:42 PM
> To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>; Udit Kumar
> <udit.ku...@nxp.com>
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Mee
.@linaro.org>; Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
> Cc: Meenakshi Aggarwal <meenakshi.aggar...@nxp.com>;
> ard.biesheu...@linaro.org; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Udit Kumar
> <udit.ku...@nxp.com>; Varun Sethi <v.se...@nxp.com>
> Subject: RE: [
> > #
> > > > >
> > > > > [Sources]
> > > > > BaseIoLibIntrinsicInternal.h
> > > > > IoHighLevel.c
> > > > > IoLib.c
> > > > > IoLibEbc.c # Asserts on all i/o port accesses
> &g
t;> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf
> >> Of Meenakshi Aggarwal
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 6:02 PM
> >> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; leif.lindh...@linaro.org;
> >> ard.biesheu...@linaro.org
> >>
> >> Hmnnn it sounds like jedec,spi-nor meets this test.
> >>
> >> There is only one property in the DT bindings that describes the
> >> device itself (fast read support) rather than its "bus address" (chip
> >> select, frequency). Further, that single property is obsolete, at
> >> least for
Hi Leif,
> Hmm, was there a cover letter for this v2? I can only find the one from v1 in
> my
> inbox? Usually it is helpful to keep the cover letter and add comments on what
> has changed since the previous revision.
>
> Also, can you generate the patches with
> --subject-prefix="PATCH
Hi Andrew
> Udit,
>
> I think it is more like you only need ACPI if you don't have a driver.
Ok, then ACPI or say firmware needs to export AML methods, which are known to
OS.
> If it is standard bus with standard drivers the OS code can do power
> management
> without any help from ACPI.
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Thompson [mailto:daniel.thomp...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 1:42 AM
> To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>; Leif Lindholm
> <leif.lindh...@linaro.org
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 1:10 AM
> To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thomp...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>; Leif Lindholm
> <leif.lindh...@linaro.org
methods to be implemented.
Regards
Udit
From: af...@apple.com [mailto:af...@apple.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 11:05 PM
To: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thomp...@linaro.org>; Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>; edk2-devel@lists.01.
slave or SPI slave ?
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Udit
> >
> >> -Original Message-----
> >> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 7:34 PM
> >> To: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.c
.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 7:34 PM
> To: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>
> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Varun
> Sethi <v.se...@nxp.com>; Daniel Thompson <daniel.thomp...@linaro.org>;
> Graeme Gregory <graeme.g
For sure, AML methods (as needed _ON/OFF/RST/STA etc) /_DSD will to be coded in
table using either of.
Please see more in line
Regards
Udit
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 5:59 PM
> To: Udit Kumar <udi
> On 21 November 2017 at 09:59, Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Ard.
> > Below table was for example. I am not converting whole DT to ACPI
> > tables :) My idea is to reduce Linux patches for probing as possible.
> > Also keeping firmware an
as well
Regards
Udit
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 3:08 PM
> To: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>
> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Varun
> S
Hi,
I am enabling ACPI on NXP platform , In order to do minimal changes in Linux
driver for device-driver binding.
I want to use PRP0001 device as CID and HID as actual (NXP allocated HID).
So that Linux can bind with PRP0001 and compatible field, where as other OS
(Window etc) can rely on
Hi,
I recently noticed in my build as well, we need to include CapsuleLib even
platform does not support Capsule update feature.
Thanks to help me, why this dependency is added in edk2.
Regards
Udit
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On
> -Original Message-
> From: Leif Lindholm [mailto:leif.lindh...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2017 8:52 PM
> To: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>
> Cc: Vabhav Sharma <vabhav.sha...@nxp.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
> ruiyu...@intel.com; jaben
org; siyuan...@intel.com; ting...@intel.com; Udit
> Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tftp assert fix for openfile failure case
>
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 07:56:32PM +0530, Vabhav wrote:
> > Issue:
> > when file open is failed, assert was seen d
Thanks Ard,
Your another patch set is addressing my concern
Regards
Udit
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2017 4:41 PM
> To: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>
> Cc: edk2-devel@lis
Thanks Ard.
This will allow to use PCF8563 on any platform not limiting to targeted
platform.
Few comments are inline.
Regards
Udit
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Ard
> Biesheuvel
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2017 3:47 PM
Thanks Jeremy
> Hi,
>
> On 10/27/2017 10:09 PM, Udit Kumar wrote:
> >> (along those lines)
> >>
> >> 6 - Build an emulated disk controller as well as NV region in el3 (or
> >> el2) and export them to UEFI & the OS as real devices. Then
> &
; To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>; Udit Kumar
> <udit.ku...@nxp.com>
> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Andrew Fish <af...@apple.com>;
> olivier.mar...@arm.com; Vladimir Olovyannikov
> <vladimir.olovyanni...@broadcom.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] Stori
ample driver using this scheme,
Mainly around OS implementation
Regards
Udit
> -Original Message-
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 11:09 PM
> To: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>
> Cc: Pankaj Bansal <pan
runtime services using some sort of file system.
Thanks
Udit
> -Original Message-
> From: af...@apple.com [mailto:af...@apple.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 11:16 PM
> To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>;
Hi
> + Status = gBS->AllocatePages (AllocateAddress,
> + EfiRuntimeServicesData,
> + EFI_SIZE_TO_PAGES
> (mNsCommBuffMemRegion.Length),
> + );
> + if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> +DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR,
Hi Meenakshi/Liming,
My 2 cents, around this.
1)
Having a new lib for BE read might not be helpful for us,
e.g. a IP which is in BE mode access the UART for print or system registers
which are in LE,
then with new Lib, we will get all read/write in BE mode
2)
Especially for our IPs, which
Ticket
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729 is created.
Thx
Udit
> -Original Message-
> From: Udit Kumar
> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2017 6:55 PM
> To: 'Zeng, Star' <star.z...@intel.com>
> Cc: edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
> Subje
/Page.c(722)
Regards
Udit
> -Original Message-
> From: Zeng, Star [mailto:star.z...@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2017 6:16 PM
> To: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>; edk2-devel-01 de...@lists.01.org>
> Cc: Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>
> Su
Dear Edk2 Expert,
With edk2 shell, I am doing simple copy with USB,
Flow is below
Start- USB device is enumerated and given address 1.
1. On Shell , cp a b
2- After a while Host controller reports an error
3- Layer above Host controller, reset the USB port
4- and Slot is enabled again (
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Hao
> Wu
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 12:31 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Hao Wu ; Michael D Kinney
> ; Jiewen Yao
work/SnpDxe/Transmit.c
Have print only for EFI_NOT_READY.
And in MdeModulePkg/Universal/Network/MnpDxe/MnpIo.c, print error as well
for second case.
Hope this helps
Thanks
Udit
> -Original Message-
> From: Meenakshi Aggarwal
> Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 3:56 PM
> To: Udit Ku
I think these error prints should be check against Status
Regards
Udit
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
> Meenakshi Aggarwal
> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 3:36 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Subject: [edk2] SNP
kg is hiding UEFI memory.
> > whereas this memory can be used by OS.
> >
> > This patch, allows OS to use UEFI code area.
> >
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> > Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by:
SD is exclusivity used by UEFI or OS. Any corrections ?
Thanks
Udit
> -Original Message-
> From: Pankaj Bansal
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 8:22 PM
> To: Andrew Fish <af...@apple.com>; Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>; edk2-
> de...@lists.01.or
> > On Sep 19, 2017, at 9:27 PM, Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 18 September 2017 at 22:28, Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com> wrote:
> >>> Thanks Vladimir,
> >>> With your design, you did delayed write to eMMC du
> On 18 September 2017 at 22:28, Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Vladimir,
> > With your design, you did delayed write to eMMC due to sharing with
> > OS. But it works for you:) Say if eMMC controllers offers you a
> > status b
Thanks for this,
If memory is marked as reserved by HobList then gDS->AddMemorySpace will return
error 15. No ?
Regards
Udit
> -Original Message-
> From: Sakar Arora [mailto:sakar.ar...@arm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 4:51 PM
> To: Udit Kumar <
t;
> While creating Hob list, ArmPlatformPkg is hiding UEFI memory.
> whereas this memory can be used by OS.
>
> This patch, allows OS to use UEFI code area.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Vladimir Olovyannikov [mailto:vladimir.olovyanni...@broadcom.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 10:22 PM
> To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>; Udit Kumar
> <udit.ku...@nxp.com>
> Cc: grant.lik...@linaro.org; edk2-d
eremy Linton <jeremy.lin...@arm.com>
> Cc: Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>; grant.lik...@linaro.org.
> <grant.lik...@linaro.org>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; olivier.mar...@arm.com
> Subject: Re: [edk2] Storing Non volatile variables on SD/NAND
>
> On 18 September 201
Hi EDK-2 Experts,
I am looking to store NV variables on SD/NAND device.
While browsing, I came across some old post at link,
http://feishare.com/efimail/messages/20130319-1700-Re__edk2__Regarding_storing_Boot_Device_Config_in_persistent_memory-Olivier_Martin.html
Looks like, this is
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo