Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote recently:
- is it time to think about, and start a future LinuxCNC version
which - for the sake of an upside - breaks with some old habits and
components
- is it a good idea to link this 'cut' with an effort to address
licensing issues
I'd like to
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 05:00:23 +
Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com wrote:
actually this should have gone in 2.5 (even 2.4 ? not sure about that)
the pin is wrong there too - but it is an pin that follows machine on.
I do this wrong all the time, but what's been explained to me is:
1.
Does anyone have a copy of the last version of EMC (now Linuxcnc)
released entirely in the public domain? If so, I'd like to have a copy
for the purpose of studying the licensing issues that were brought up
in the let's rewrite this thing! thread.
If not, does anyone with a better memory than me
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:38:23 +
Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com wrote:
What happens is the old branch is merged up in to the newer branches.
This way all the branches get the bug fix.
OK, this makes a lot of sense. Of course, I had it totally backwards :)
Do you trial push with
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 12:07:38 -0400
Matt Shaver m...@mattshaver.com wrote:
Does anyone have a copy of the last version of EMC (now Linuxcnc)
released entirely in the public domain?
Maybe I've answered my own question, but I located this:
ftp://ftp.isd.mel.nist.gov/pub/emc/emcsoft/
There's
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 12:45:38 -0400
Matt Shaver m...@mattshaver.com wrote:
There's no more cvs.linuxcnc.org, but the log at git.linuxcnc starts
with:
John Kasunich [Sat, 11 Oct 2003 17:30:53 -0400 (21:30 +)]
Initial revision
I'll go research it myself, but if anyone knows how
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:44:19 -0400
Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
The emc-1.1-17.src.tgz file in that directory is the same one I find
I archived on my NAS. Most of the files in that tarball bear no
statement of license or copyright. One can hope they are covered by
the
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:45:14 -0400
EBo e...@sandien.com wrote:
a restart takes an hour or more after shutdown? Out of curiosity,
what machine might that be, and why so long?
A web type printing press like the ones used to make newspapers. It can
take quite a while to get the paper to run
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:24:57 -0400
Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/15/2012 1:25 AM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
After a quick look it really seems to be well written. Except that I
was hoping also for at least some pieces of code that makes that
stuff to work. Do You have any
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 23:09:57 -0400
Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
Keep in mind
that he probably has to do the same digging as anyone else since you
wouldn't be asking about his own code.
I haven't talked to him in several years, mainly because I don't want
to bug him. I'm glad to
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:40:06 +0300
Alex Joni alex.j...@robcon.ro wrote:
Last emc1 version was 1.2.0-rc1 iirc,
you can still find the CVS tree for emc1 here:
http://emc.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/emc/emc/
Thanks Alex!
I've been doing some research into copyright law to determine if
Michael
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:32:22 -0400
Kenneth Lerman kenneth.ler...@se-ltd.com wrote:
Am I correct that an undivided interest means that any of the joint
authors can license the work to others without the permission of the
other authors?
Yes. From the reading I did, I believe that the author
If anyone wants to rebut, dispute, or otherwise challenge my analysis
or conclusions about the copyright status of Linuxcnc, it would be
great if you could do so some time in the next two weeks or so. If you
need more time to compose your arguments, just post a short e-mail to
the list saying so!
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:01:39 -0400
Dave e...@dc9.tzo.com wrote:
If a company or individual does not follow the existing licensing,
how will the licensing be enforced?
It would be up to the copyright holder (which is going to be the
author(s)) to hire a lawyer and sue to enforce their rights.
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:38:37 -0500
Tom Easterday tom-...@bgp.nu wrote:
So you are saying I shouldn't use the rip script? Why wouldn't run
in place work? -Tom
Do this:
1. Remove all linuxcnc* and emc2* packages.
2. Add these two APT source lines to your repository list:
deb
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 22:48:49 -0500
Tom Easterday tom-...@bgp.nu wrote:
Michael,
I recall seeing a message from you a while back saying you had given
up on raspberry pi (I'm paraphrasing) but I can't seem to locate that
in my mail at the moment. I was curious why it was you abandoned it?
Was
What cross compiler did you folks use? Was it the 'official' one at
http://www.raspberrypi.org/downloads or did you make your own using
ct-ng, or something else?
Thanks,
Matt
--
Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
Buy
I ask, because it would be easier for me if someone had already done
this, rather than me having to do the actual work :) Anyone got one of
these? I figure it should be called hal_rpiport...
Thanks,
Matt
--
Everyone
Can anyone recommend a motherboard that will run the standard 10.04 CD
install of linuxcnc? Latency-test results need to be respectable, but
software stepping ability is not a requirement.
1. This must be a motherboard I can buy today, new, with at least one
standard PCI slot.
2. Graphics can be
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:57:07 +0400
Alexey Starikovskiy aysta...@gmail.com wrote:
Celeron G550 2-core, 2.6GHz.
ASUS P8H61-M LX2 R2.0 mATX
2x2Gb RAM DDR3 PC3-10600 -- no swap
in BIOS turn off C1e, C3 and C6
no isolcpus=1 shows 5600 max jitter
with isolcpus=1 -- 2400.
Thank You! I have a
, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Matt Shaver m...@mattshaver.com
wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:57:07 +0400
Alexey Starikovskiy aysta...@gmail.com wrote:
Celeron G550 2-core, 2.6GHz.
ASUS P8H61-M LX2 R2.0 mATX
2x2Gb RAM DDR3 PC3-10600 -- no swap
in BIOS turn off C1e, C3 and C6
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:19:53 +0100
Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
I think we should have the option to log everything, and through a
singel channel;
I don't usually comment on this kind of stuff, because I don't know
that much about it. Nevertheless, at the risk of exposing my
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:11:10 +0400
Alexey Starikovskiy aysta...@gmail.com wrote:
Linux f1200 2.6.32-122-rtai #rtai SMP Tue Jul 27 12:44:07 CDT 2010
i686 GNU/Linux -- it's the standard kernel from Live CD.
Ordering one today!
I wonder what's going on with these things...
Thanks!
Matt
1. I checked out hostmot2-firmware to try out the build.
2. I have ISE 10.1 Serice Pack 3 installed at /opt/Xilinx/.
3. I run 'make' and get quite a ways (an hour+), some bitfiles even
built, and then it stops with:
./pin.py SV24_144 x20_1000 fw/3x20-1/SV24.PIN.tmp
# tempdir /tmp/hm2fQc9g4
#
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:10:00 -0700
Sebastian Kuzminsky s...@highlab.com wrote:
On 02/27/2013 07:25 PM, Matt Shaver wrote:
What am I doing wrong?
The 3x20 uses an FPGA that's too fancy for version 10 of ISE, you
need version 13 or better.
OK, I also have 14.4 installed in /opt/Xilinx. I
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:07:06 -0800 (PST)
Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com wrote:
It should be noted that while ISE versions 9 and 10 may build Spartan
3 bitfiles, there is a fair chance that they will not work, so its
best to use the lastest for Spartan 3 and
I'm going to get through the
concurrent SMTP connections;
please try again later
And now, on with the show...
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:33:29 +
David Armstrong dave...@outlook.com wrote:
On 28/02/13 02:25, Matt Shaver wrote:
What am I doing wrong?
Matt,
which
A fellow on -users said 2.5.2 was released without any announcement on
the lists. Whoever did the release: Check your e-mail for a bounced
e-mail to the lists. I've been having problems sending mail to
-developers lately, so maybe your announcement got bounced back to you!
Thanks,
Matt
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 10:35:21 -0700
Sebastian Kuzminsky s...@highlab.com wrote:
On 3/4/13 09:48 , Matt Shaver wrote:
A fellow on -users said 2.5.2 was released without any announcement
on the lists.
The announcement went out this morning:
http://article.gmane.org
On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 16:14:12 +
andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there scope for a HAL-to-keysccan userspace cmponent, is this even
possible?
1. The HAL component would accept so-many row bits and so-many column
bits as address inputs to a character ROM.
2. The ROM would be so-many
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 17:06:32 +
andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 March 2013 16:32, Daniel Rogge dro...@tormach.com wrote:
A simple example:
The hal gearchange component allows people to select different
scales for speed commands. Without persistence the gearchange.sel
pin
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 14:06:14 -0500
Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
Now, separate item, but same subject, the .var and .txt files.
If you will send me your .ini, and any .hal files (and .xml files if
using pyvcp) that you are using for your setup, I'll take a look at
these issues.
Thanks,
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 12:16:39 -0600
Daniel Rogge dro...@tormach.com wrote:
Redis seems like the winner to me, but I
didn't perceive a groundswell of support for redis the last time it
came up on the list.
Sometimes people express their support of an idea simply by not
complaining about it.
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 00:18:07 +0100
Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
An extremely valuable non-technical contribution to this whole effort
would be to tackle the licensing issue with an angle to results in a
realistic timeframe, and I would really appreciate if somebody else
could
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 06:39:25 +0100
Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
Am 08.03.2013 um 04:06 schrieb Matt Shaver:
4. According to this page:
http://www.zeromq.org/area:licensing
they say:
***
Static linking exception
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 11:59:44 +
andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
As a first step, what should I license my files as?
This is very good of you to offer! In my own opinion, the two rational
choices are:
1. GPL Version 2 OR LATER
2. Public Domain
These provide maximum flexibility, and the
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 17:30:52 -0600
Chris Radek ch...@timeguy.com wrote:
I guess I am wondering which set of assumptions is more likely to be
correct, and I'm looking for evidence about that.
I'll go out on a limb here and say that only Paul is likely to be
unwilling. I base this belief on my
contribute them back upstream under the terms of your LGPLv3
licensing.
So, are we allowed to use zeromq in this way?
Thanks,
Matt Shaver
--
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
Wave(TM
The Official Response:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Matt Shaver m...@mattshaver.com wrote:
I have asked the ZeroMQ steward, Pieter Hintjens, wrt to
compatibility of a GPL2only project and ZMQ, and his answer was a
straight
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 08:06:28 +0100
Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
I vaguely remember the question, it was from Michael Haberler on IRC,
but I seem to remember there was more to it than just calling the
library, and I don't have the IRC logs to check.
To be clear: you can use libzmq
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 01:19:31 -0500
John Kasunich jmkasun...@fastmail.fm wrote:
If at any point a chunk of code was public domain, it seems to
me that the authors as of that point in time gave up all rights
to it, including the right to object to re-licensing. I would say
we only need to
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 23:25:39 -0600
John Morris j...@zultron.com wrote:
Pieter's not right about this. LCNC is GPLv2 ONLY, and libzmq is
LPGLv3. This compatibility matrix shows the combo is invalid:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility
The trouble is that the
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 08:01:24 -0600
EBo e...@sandien.com wrote:
Looks like we need to email EFF or GNU for a determination. Matt
what you say is that 0MQ allows linking to anything, but GPLv2
requires that anything linked must then convey GPLv2, then GPL is the
problem and LCNC cannot use 0MQ
On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 22:17:32 +0100
Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
I have identified a small piece of code which could take on an
important function in HAL/RTAPI. If it were integrated, it would
become part of the HAL API.
That code is currently GPL2only.
The author has
P.S. We are bound by the warranty, anti-tivoization, patent, and
other terms of the (L)GPLv3 if we use 0MQ.
Wait! Stop right here! I wrote the above quoted text, as an
afterthought to a post I made earlier in this thread. Now that I
consider it again, this may not be the case. Since the
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:56:47 -0400
Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
I know the history of the development of LCNC. I don't want to rehash
why things are the way they are now. I just want to see them get
better as we move forward.
I was just fixing to spend a lot of time trying to
If I spend one more minute thinking or writing about copyright and
licensing issues I'm going to give myself a brain tumor, so I'd like to
do something useful for a change :)
GP Orcullo has got a project (PICnc) where he attaches a PIC32
auxiliary processor to linuxcnc on a Raspberry Pi through
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 14:38:33 -0600
Sebastian Kuzminsky s...@highlab.com wrote:
Matt Shaver m...@mattshaver.com wrote:
Is anyone else working on hostmot2 over spi? If not, does anyone have
any advise or pointers on how to go about this?
My best guess is to look at the difference between
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 16:29:10 -0500
Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
I think the best way would be to make the PRU do the SPI or
some other serial protocol. The Pi also has a PRU, right?
AFAIK, the PRU is TI only. The RPi has SPI hardware, but looking at the
PICnc code it seems that
This is a somewhat old thread, but I thought I'd finish it by telling
you what was actually wrong :)
If you are trying to boot over a SATA interface, and you get errors
like:
ALERT! /dev/disks/by-uuid/a-big-hex-number-string does not exist.
Dropping to a shell.
Go into the BIOS settings and
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:01:52 -0500
Stuart Stevenson stus...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a reminder about the week of June 17th. Give me an idea if you
think you may come to Wichita that weekend. It would be nice to have
an idea of how many could be here. I will set up for however many
wish to be
Will this cause us any problems? Everything I read about this is long
on announcement and short on details I can use. :)
Thanks,
Matt
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 18:38:07 +
From: SourceForge.net Team nore...@sourceforge.net
To: m...@mattshaver.com
Subject: SourceForge
On Sun, 05 May 2013 14:47:33 -0700
dave dengv...@charter.net wrote:
I've heard another version of the above quote. May you live in
interesting times. That could be either a curse or a blessing. ;-)
May you live in interesting times, May you come to the attention of
those in authority, and May
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2013-March/000169.html
Nothing spectacular will happen today, but I thought the occasion
deserved mention. Since 10.04 Server has two more years left for
official support, I wonder if there is a way to make the update
mechanism think we are all
On Fri, 17 May 2013 08:50:36 +0200
Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
If anybody wonders about the above: I am super-pissed about the
utterly unprofessional behavior of the past board on the issue.
For a background on how the board was created, see:
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 19:02:42 -0400
Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
On Thursday 06 June 2013 18:55:24 EBo did opine:
rockhopper?
Yeah EBo, it draws logic diagrams of what you have wired up in
your .hal files.
The really funny thing about this is that the hal file visualization
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:08:00 +0200
Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
If somebody wants to build on this, I would be happy to cooperate - I
do lack the Javascript skills to build something meaningful beyond
the 'hello world' level, and it isnt my main focus either.
Peter Jensen will be
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 21:49:19 -0400
Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
That would be something that I had cobbled up, but then bypassed,
with the net input probably still hooked up, so 2 or 3 modules are
there, and are being fed data, but the output isn't being used
anymore. That sort of
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 12:45:37 -0500
Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
Matt Shaver wrote:
MH wrote me recently to ask if I had fixed the licensing problem
yet... ಠ_ಠ
...
Michael actually asked if you'd FIXED the licensing issue?
That can't be true.
Well, maybe he didn't exactly say
On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 18:28:28 +
Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com wrote:
And I don't think having a relatively closed door discussion about
these broad questions should be done in Wichita. Whichta would be
great for figuring out the details of HOW we will do what we have
decided.
I
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 20:01:45 -0500
Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
David Bagby wrote:
These same source files also contain comments that claim the
contents of the file are licensed under a GPL license. Counsel
tells me those comments are at best wishful thinking. For better or
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:13:00 -0400
Kenneth Lerman kenneth.ler...@se-ltd.com wrote:
3 -- So you believe that LinuxCNC should be actively promoted or that
it should be left alone to exist in peace?
I don't think it needs TV commercials or anything like that :) I think
if a company sold machine
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:54:26 +0100
andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
The basic image is standard LinuxCNC, he just changed a caption. I
don't know if anyone claims ownership of the chips logo.
IIRC, Chips our mascot, and cousin to
Tux ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tux ) was created by Rab
0. I really want all this copyright/licensing stuff resolved, then
buried so deep I never have to see it again.
1. I also want it resolved in a way that maximally protects what we
have with minimum effort on our part, especially with almost no effort
on my part :) The solution must also age well,
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:45:23 +0800
Paul Kelly t...@caswa.com wrote:
2.A Could you not just make (and document) every effort to contact the
existing authors with an If you object to this new licensing
arrangement (which is fundamentally a holier than thou, close to
public domain approach) then
In another thread:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:53:11 -0400
Dave e...@dc9.tzo.com wrote:
I suspect that LinuxCNC code has already been stolen, we just aren't
entirely aware of it. There are some closed source embedded CNC
systems out there that
have stated that they have some NIST code in
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:27:24 +0200
Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
The question I would have is: how relevant is that comparison - and
the case you cite - anywhere relevant to 'inhibiting use of LinuxCNC'?
I think Dave's point was that we've only experienced one brush with
the law
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:16:42 +0100
andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/sVUHBjKMHtNWN3LdpZOEj9MTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/G_KMzBhurtN_xhzhEnrLydMTjNZETYmyPJy0liipFm0?feat=directlink
What's the IC? I can't
Over the last few days I've been writing stuff here and reading other
people's stuff. I've been rolling all this stuff around in my mind with
the intention of figuring out what solution I would propose for the
copyright/licensing issue, and what sort of plan I could make for
things to do at the
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:44:57 -0400
Matt Shaver m...@mattshaver.com wrote:
I HAVE TO GET UP EARLY, SO I'LL CONTINUE THIS TOMORROW WITH DETAILS ON
HOW I THINK WE SHOULD HANDLE THE MORE SERIOUS THREAT DESCRIBED IN #2A
ABOVE. ALSO, I WILL PREDICT THE FUTURE.
So, this is where I left off the other
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:40:06 -0600
Sebastian Kuzminsky s...@highlab.com wrote:
We have this (slightly out of date, and doesn't cover all the info
Matt listed):
http://www.linuxcnc.org/docs/2.5/html/code/Code_Notes.html#_architecture_overview
This, but at multiple complexity levels. We need
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:12:58 -0500
Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
I took a quick look around, and I couldn't find anything that looked
like EMC source, but it might be there in a compressed file.
I've been rooting around for a couple3 hours and have the start of a
small pile, all
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:10:21 -0400
Eric Keller eekel...@psu.edu wrote:
tl;dr, all of it anyway.
Brevity: Not my strong suit.
Didn't you put together a list of files with
non-conforming licenses recently?
That might have been Michael Haberler. I think I remember the e-mail
you're talking
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:16:23 -0600
EBo e...@sandien.com wrote:
I just hope the processes does not burn you to a crisp.
This is a worry, but Seb seems to handle stress in a healthy way so I
think he'll be OK.
One of the few things I would like to see kept in and taken seriously
is
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:57:50 -0500
TJoseph Powderly tjt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/25/2013 12:08 AM, Jon Elson wrote:
So, now the question is, what do I do with them?
maybe you matt can compare notes
I've got a bunch of historical stuff and so does Jon, and probably
others do as well.
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 04:44:52 -0600
EBo e...@sandien.com wrote:
out of curiosity, why has Ray's name come up? Is he one of the
people who will not consider relicensing so we can get it straight?
I thought the only real problem child was Paul.
I think it's just plain curiosity. I'm sure Ray
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:16:51 -0500
John Morris j...@zultron.com wrote:
On 06/26/2013 01:12 PM, John Morris wrote:
Sounds like these are the git repos to go with.
This is really good! Anything that is a pull from Sourceforge is
covered by this. I guess the only source I need to look at
Jun 2013 09:01:00 -0400
Matt Shaver m...@mattshaver.com wrote:
I hope we announced this sufficiently in advance, but there's a
meeting on IRC now (Saturday the 29th of June, 2013 -
4:00pmGMT/9:00amEST). Come help us argue! :)
Thanks,
Matt
I hope we announced this sufficiently in advance, but there's a meeting
on IRC now (Saturday the 29th of June, 2013 - 4:00pmGMT/9:00amEST).
Come help us argue! :)
Thanks,
Matt
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 21:34:43 -0500
Charles Steinkuehler char...@steinkuehler.net wrote:
IMHO, there really needs to be a Sid branch of LinuxCNC that is
GUARANTEED to break your machine and kill the machine operator (anyone
in the field actually using this on real equipment deserves what they
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 18:15:54 -0500
Charles Steinkuehler char...@steinkuehler.net wrote:
So what do I think needs to change? Well, let's start with what
exists now, which I see as:
Tier 1) Anointed LinuxCNC developers with push access to
git.linuxcnc.org.
...
Tier 2) People who have
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:36:25 +0300
Alex Joni alex.j...@robcon.ro wrote:
1. pages can be renamed, deleted or whatnot. for that you need wiki
admin access (I think the board and a couple more people have that
access). 2. regarding upload:
- we can do one-off's quite easily, just mail me or
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 13:15:55 -0400
Ian McMahon imcma...@prototechnical.com wrote:
however it shakes out, there needs to be some clear direction on the
best practices for managing development on branches and forks, how
pull requests and merges should be done, who can and will review and
merge
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 22:09:21 +0200
Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
Am 01.07.2013 um 16:20 schrieb EBo e...@sandien.com:
hat raises a question though how deeply you want
Python to get into LinuxCNC.
No, it does not; a key/value pair-based API does not imply any
language.
You
On Mon, 1 Jul 2013 13:22:17 +0100
andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 July 2013 13:17, Stuart Stevenson stus...@gmail.com wrote:
Will the toolID be alphanumeric or any other symbology?
Yes :-)
You would want to avoid employing:
http://xkcd.com/327/
Some real world applications:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 16:32:34 -0400
Ian McMahon imcma...@prototechnical.com wrote:
Beautiful!
On Jul 2, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Chris Radek ch...@timeguy.com wrote:
I had
not done this on ours, but I have now; thanks for the reminder.
See, the system does work, at least sometimes :)
Thanks,
On Sat, 6 Jul 2013 20:23:12 +
Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com wrote:
I guess it really comes down to at what performance machine does jerk
limitation show real benefits ?
I would guess that almost all machines _we_ deal with would benefit
from jerk limiting. A machine that might
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:44:15 -0500
Sebastian Kuzminsky s...@highlab.com wrote:
* Once all these features are in or have been postponed to 2.7, I'll
make a 2.6 release branch and immediately make a first official
pre-release. Hopefully this will happen in the first half of July.
...
*
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:46:00 +0200
Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
As a base for builds right now, the rtos-master-v0 branch is ok and
I'll make sure it doesnt break - just note there will be major change
coming shortly
I'm trying to build this branch, and upon running the
Thanks you guys!
Sam called it correctly: I was missing the 'libboost-serialization-dev'
package. I was able to get the configure script to run to the end
without installing 'libboost-thread-dev', but Seb's test indicated that
I needed that package and a whole bunch more, mostly concerned (I
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:34:29 -0400
Tom Easterday tom-...@bgp.nu wrote:
I did the install and rebooted (no RealTek ethernet) but it comes up
with a login prompt, no GUI. I put the output of dmesg here:
http://pastebin.com/GzQHt4L5
Is there something here that tells me why it isn't launching
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 08:58 +, paul_c wrote:
Quartus does not qualify as a major component, nor is it free, neither is
it's output - Please read Altera's TC.
If we're in trouble, so is the GNU Radio project. As an example, if you
download their latest version and look in the archive file
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 19:12 -0600, Chris Radek wrote:
What is your point exactly?
I think I have found out. While reading Slashdot, one of my favorite
ways to waste time, I came upon this:
http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/08/11/28/2339242.shtml
which points to this article, which is a good
Consider the following program:
G1X1F10
G1X0F10
(G43)
M2
GUI is AXIS and two HAL meters are displayed, one looking at
halui.program.is-idle, and the other at halui.mode.is-auto.
When the program is initially opened the mode changes briefly to auto
while the program is verified. When the program
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 12:55 -0500, Jon Elson wrote:
Ahh, some new news! Torsten Koschorrek, the rtai ARM maintainer, has
volunteered to do an rtai port for the Cortex-A8!
But, he is tied up right now, and won't be able to dig into it until
next month. Still, that actually sounds pretty
At the urging of Alex Chris on IRC, I performed these same procedures
with tkemc and xemc. It works essentially the same way, except these
older guis don't make any effort to do intelligent mode switching. Now
that I've seen it work with the simpler guis, I'm sure it works as
intended. I stand
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 14:33 -0400, Dale Grover wrote:
But, just to be clear, it's all Matt's fault. Somehow.
Isn't everything?
Jon Elson wrote:
Oh, the beagle
is almost entirely
1.8 V signalling, especially directly connecting to the expansion
connector, at least according to my reading.
I'd just like to know that what I've observed in this bug report:
http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2841156
isn't just another of my all too frequent hallucinations, or the product
of my misconfiguration.
Thanks,
Matt
This fpga image was made for me by Peter at Mesa a while back. I used it
successfully for a while, then built a 4 axis machine and discovered
that stepgen3 indeed had two step pins and no dir pin. Peter fixed it
and sent me an updated .bit file. Recently I've been using the file
distributed with
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 23:05 -0600, Chris Radek wrote:
I don't see a problem here (yay).
That's good! I just want keep the roaming zombie hordes outside the
fence...
Thanks,
Matt
--
Return on Information:
Google
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
