By the way:
According to Charle’s law and the consequence of the
third law of thermodynamics as the thermodynamic temperature
of a system approaches absolute zero the volume of particles
approaches zero too. It means the particles must have flat forms.
They must have geometrical form of a circl
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, March 10, 2013 10:39:50 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Craig Weinberg
>> wrote:
>> > sorry, that was the wrong link: http://s33light.org/post/44836667412 is
>> > the
>> > right one
>>
>> Wha
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 10:39:50 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Craig Weinberg
> >
> wrote:
> > sorry, that was the wrong link: http://s33light.org/post/44836667412 is
> the
> > right one
>
> What you don't address in that list is the specific criticism I
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> sorry, that was the wrong link: http://s33light.org/post/44836667412 is the
> right one
What you don't address in that list is the specific criticism I have made:
1. According to physics as we know it, everything in the universe
follows me
sorry, that was the wrong link: http://s33light.org/post/44836667412 is the
right one
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 9:35:37 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Craig Weinberg
> >
> wrote:
>
> >> And you're confusing its complexity with magic.
> >
> >
> > Magic is the
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 9:35:37 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Craig Weinberg
> >
> wrote:
>
> >> And you're confusing its complexity with magic.
> >
> >
> > Magic is the official go-to straw man of the pseudoskeptic. It just
> means 'I
> > have no argum
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 9:33:52 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Craig Weinberg
> >
> wrote:
>
> >> That would mean it is impossible to have
> >> voluntary control of one's actions independently of physics.
> >
> >
> > No, it means that physics must support
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>> And you're confusing its complexity with magic.
>
>
> Magic is the official go-to straw man of the pseudoskeptic. It just means 'I
> have no argument so you must be stupid.'
I don't think you understand the word "magic". You seem to thin
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>> That would mean it is impossible to have
>> voluntary control of one's actions independently of physics.
>
>
> No, it means that physics must support voluntary control of one's actions.
>
>>
>> Now you
>> are saying the opposite.
>
>
> No
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 8:19:21 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>
> On 3/10/2013 5:08 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, March 10, 2013 7:59:11 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Craig Weinberg
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sunday, March 10, 2013 12:16:06 A
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 8:11:25 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Craig Weinberg
> >
> wrote:
>
> > No, that would only make sense if people had control of their own
> actions
> > independently of your idea of physics. Punishing stones who roll down a
> hill
On 3/10/2013 5:08 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 7:59:11 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Craig Weinberg >
wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, March 10, 2013 12:16:06 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>>
>> On 3/9/2013 7:38 PM, Craig Weinberg
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 8:06:39 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>
> On 3/10/2013 4:57 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, March 10, 2013 5:51:35 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>>
>> On 3/10/2013 1:08 PM, spudb...@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> Question- I also thought determinism mean't that you could pr
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> No, that would only make sense if people had control of their own actions
> independently of your idea of physics. Punishing stones who roll down a hill
> is not going to prevent similar rollings from happening in the future. You
> do under
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 7:59:11 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Craig Weinberg
> >
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sunday, March 10, 2013 12:16:06 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/9/2013 7:38 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> A person can resist thei
On 3/10/2013 4:57 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 5:51:35 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 3/10/2013 1:08 PM, spudb...@aol.com wrote:
Question- I also thought determinism mean't that you could predict where
and when,
a particle could move. But that Werner Heisenber
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, March 10, 2013 12:16:06 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>>
>> On 3/9/2013 7:38 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>>
>> A person can resist their both their environment and genetic programming,
>>
>>
>> And you know this how?
>
>
>
> Because
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 5:51:35 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
>
> On 3/10/2013 1:08 PM, spudb...@aol.com wrote:
>
> Question- I also thought determinism mean't that you could predict where
> and when, a particle could move. But that Werner Heisenberg, said that you
> could determine, on, but ne
On 3/10/2013 1:08 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Question- I also thought determinism mean't that you could predict where and when, a
particle could move. But that Werner Heisenberg, said that you could determine, on, but
never the other. Would you say that the universe is predictable and Heisen
On 3/10/2013 5:41 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 10 Mar 2013, at 09:31, Stephen P. King wrote:
OK, what generates or requires the stratification into levels?
To ask a machine about herself (like in self-duplication experiences),
you need to represent the machine in the language available t
Question- I also thought determinism mean't that you could predict where and
when, a particle could move. But that Werner Heisenberg, said that you could
determine, on, but never the other. Would you say that the universe is
predictable and Heisenberg might be wrong?
Thanks.
Mitch
Everythi
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 4:51:56 PM UTC+2, advanced...@list.ru wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 4:48:10 PM UTC+2, advanced...@list.ru wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 3:33:28 PM UTC+2, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/5/2013 6:23 AM, advanced...@list.ru wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 3/10/2013 1:13 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
If there are some day machines among us which behave just like humans and they engage in
criminal behaviour should they be destroyed? Will there be at least some sort of process
whereby it is determined if the machine is guilty or not, or would an
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 11:57:16 AM UTC-4, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 Craig Weinberg >wrote:
>
> > What I am saying though is that even a perfect correlation does not mean
>> direct causation. Everyone has a brain and a heart, but that doesn't mean
>> the brain causes the heart
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 12:43:38 PM UTC-4, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 Craig Weinberg >wrote:
>
> Everyone except free will deniers know exactly what free will is.
>
>
> I am NOT a "free will" denier anymore than I am a burp denier, and I can
> assure you I don't know what "free
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 Craig Weinberg wrote:
Everyone except free will deniers know exactly what free will is.
I am NOT a "free will" denier anymore than I am a burp denier, and I can
assure you I don't know what "free will" is supposed to mean and neither do
you.
> > It needs no description un
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 Craig Weinberg wrote:
> What I am saying though is that even a perfect correlation does not mean
> direct causation. Everyone has a brain and a heart, but that doesn't mean
> the brain causes the heart.
>
Up to now whenever we observe a fully functioning human brain we also
o
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 11:35:31 AM UTC-4, spudb...@aol.com wrote:
>
> Moreover, some people appear to hang tough with life, and do not commit
> suicide, despite the intolerable conditions of their life. Which is
> something of a puzzle, I suppose. Some people do and some people don't. So
>
Moreover, some people appear to hang tough with life, and do not commit
suicide, despite the intolerable conditions of their life. Which is something
of a puzzle, I suppose. Some people do and some people don't. So maybe its a
biological condition that makes us hang in there?
-Original M
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 12:13:55 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
> On 3/9/2013 6:23 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> An automatic pilot only controls the plane to the extent that it extends
> human intentions to control the plane. The automatic pilot can just as
> easily be set to crash the plane
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 12:16:06 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
> On 3/9/2013 7:38 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> A person can resist their both their environment and genetic programming,
>
>
> And you know this how?
>
Because identical twins can intentionally lead very different lives. We can
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 4:33:43 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 10 Mar 2013, at 01:48, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, March 9, 2013 7:26:25 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>>
>> On 3/9/2013 4:06 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, March 9, 2013 6:30:53 PM UTC-5, sta
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 12:10:04 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
> On 3/9/2013 5:53 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, March 9, 2013 8:13:38 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>>
>> On 3/9/2013 4:48 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, March 9, 2013 7:26:25 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
Occam's Razor, Vacuum and the Scheme of the primary conditions of
existence.
==.
Vacuum is a Negative Euclidean space (-2D) so called Pseudo-
Euclidean space.
It is the simplest reference frame - like the Euclidean space
( 2D).
Now I will put a virtual - ideal particle in this -
On 10 Mar 2013, at 11:26, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 3/10/2013 5:41 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 10 Mar 2013, at 09:31, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 3/10/2013 4:02 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 09 Mar 2013, at 21:37, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 3/9/2013 6:57 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 08 Mar
On 3/10/2013 5:41 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 10 Mar 2013, at 09:31, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 3/10/2013 4:02 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 09 Mar 2013, at 21:37, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 3/9/2013 6:57 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 08 Mar 2013, at 13:58, Stephen P. King wrote (to Alberto Co
On 10 Mar 2013, at 09:31, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 3/10/2013 4:02 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 09 Mar 2013, at 21:37, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 3/9/2013 6:57 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 08 Mar 2013, at 13:58, Stephen P. King wrote (to Alberto
Corona):
We are machines, very sophisticat
On 10 Mar 2013, at 01:48, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, March 9, 2013 7:26:25 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 3/9/2013 4:06 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, March 9, 2013 6:30:53 PM UTC-5, stathisp wrote:
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Craig Weinberg
wrote:
>> They are not powe
On 3/10/2013 4:02 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 09 Mar 2013, at 21:37, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 3/9/2013 6:57 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 08 Mar 2013, at 13:58, Stephen P. King wrote (to Alberto Corona):
We are machines, very sophisticated, but machines nonetheless and
doubly so!
I don't
On 09 Mar 2013, at 21:37, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 3/9/2013 6:57 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 08 Mar 2013, at 13:58, Stephen P. King wrote (to Alberto Corona):
We are machines, very sophisticated, but machines nonetheless and
doubly so!
I don't think we know that.
Hi Bruno,
Of cour
40 matches
Mail list logo
