On 8/5/2013 6:21 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
It allows annoys me how christians justify all the suffering and
overall shittiness of existence with: ah, but that is necessary
because God wanted us to have free will.
He apparently also wanted us to have leukemia, AIDS, plague, tsunamis, volcanoes, m
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 01:46:44AM +, chris peck wrote:
> Hello Dr. Standish
>
> If I may play devil's advocate for a post it seems to me that the question
> over duration required for an optimized system to evolve is only a minor
> aspect of the argument presented in this paper.
>
> More s
Hello Dr. Standish
If I may play devil's advocate for a post it seems to me that the question over
duration required for an optimized system to evolve is only a minor aspect of
the argument presented in this paper.
More seriously it concerns the mechanics of such an evolution.
To use a comput
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:35 PM, John Clark wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Telmo Menezes
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> > if one is to believe in a god that created everything, then one also
>>> > has to believe that this
My question is serious. I know that Roger was atheist liberal guy which
was dependent on antidepressive drugs and in a certain moment he became
conservative very active at least in this list. I want to know when why and
how. You somekind something
2013/8/5 chris peck
> Hi Alby
>
> Roger is pr
Science labs are creating XNAs (or xeno-nucleic acids) some of which
(anhydrohexitol nucleic acid ) can be run through directed evolution and fold
into biologically useful forms. Life on earth uses DNA (now after billions of
years of evolution); however life likely first originated using much si
I will bite on this, because unlike the usual rubbish Roger spouts,
this is more on topic.
Fortunately, it doesn't stand up to criticism.
The argument is that because the standard genetic code is well
optimised against error correction, and because changes to the code
will be highly disruptive, i
If one has to disprove the best of sciences, which appears to be evolutionary
adaptation, in order to defend one's religion, then there must be something
wrong about the religion. Or at least one's understanding of it. There's no
need to beat down Darwin, in order to believe in God.
-Ori
In such a case where tci's are not indicated, and ssri's the same, the ancient
but improved upon use of ECT needs to be considered-but only if it actually
works.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Clough
To: theoretical_physics ;
theoretical_physics_board ; -
mindbr...@yahoogroups.com ;
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:35 PM, John Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>
>
>> > if one is to believe in a god that created everything, then one also
>> has to believe that this god
>> was malicious enough to plant an incredible amount of false evidence: the
>> f
Presenting the complexity of getting to DNA directly from a chemical soup is
barking up the wrong tree as life probably evolved after it had developed auto
catalyzing peptides through a phase of RNA based life. The origins of life most
likely used some -- as yet unkown -- simpler information rep
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
> > if one is to believe in a god that created everything, then one also has
> to believe that this god
> was malicious enough to plant an incredible amount of false evidence: the
> fossil record,
Yes, but that's not the only reason God woul
Clever Robot!
On Monday, August 5, 2013 12:41:21 PM UTC-4, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Craig Weinberg
>
> > wrote:
>
> > in some respects, Roger seems like a shadow version of myself
>
>
> Does he also engage in astrology and numerology?
>
> John K Clark
>
--
You
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 5:30 PM, John Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
>
>> > Serious proof of why the theory of evolution is wrong.
>> The irreducible complexity of DNA. See attached.
>
>
> You put no effort into defending your Juvenile ideas so I see no reason
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> in some respects, Roger seems like a shadow version of myself
Does he also engage in astrology and numerology?
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsub
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
> Serious proof of why the theory of evolution is wrong.
> The irreducible complexity of DNA. See attached.
>
You put no effort into defending your Juvenile ideas so I see no reason why
I should put any effort into attacking them.
John K C
Hi Alby
Roger is pro-drugs in the thread below you dozy dipstick. ;)
Its the liberal who is arguing for soft headed psycotherapy. its the
pharmaceutical company vs. The lilly livered liberal script.
Get with the program you silly sausage!
--- Original Message ---
From: "Alberto G. Corona"
Se
Really?! You need proof?
Try:
http://everything-list.105.n7.nabble.com/Not-to-worry-about-global-warming-We-re-long-overdue-for-an-ice-age-starting-iimmediately-td39038.html
http://everything-list.105.n7.nabble.com/Please-read-me-td39055.html
http://everything-list.105.n7.nabble.com/Think-of-t
Hi person from a totally different forum,
I'm just going to post my response to you here in this reading list, even
though it has no bearing on anything that they usually (or at least used
to, before I came along) talk about here, but subtly suggests that if
someone keeps bugging me, I might ki
A wise man once said (perhaps it was me, I don't know, I wrote it down but
lost it during my last blackout): "BWAH! GET YOUR HANDS OFF MY WALLET YOU
DIRTY FILCHER!"
Bacon sure is good. And you know what else is good? Leibniz. But when bacon
is cooking, I don't smell it, I only smell deliciousn
Hi Roger,
When did you stopped being a depressed, drug dependent, liberal and became
an hyperactive conservative?
2013/8/5 Roger Clough
>
> Sorry I forgot to put in the linK ;
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15699293
>
>
> >Hi Chaotic Inflation
> >
> >There is indeed a positive associat
Dominic Statham is a creationist.
http://creation.com/dominic-statham
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
> Serious proof of why the theory of evolution is wrong.
>
> The irreducible complexity of DNA. See attached.
>
>
> Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
> See my Leib
Hi Chaotic Inflation
More liberal so-called "science." These are the nut-jobs that
gave us CO2 as the cause of global warming.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
- Receiving the following content -
From:
Sorry I forgot to put in the linK ;
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15699293
>Hi Chaotic Inflation
>
>There is indeed a positive association between TCAs and suicide,
>(how strong it doesn't say) but otherwise there is a negative association.
>I wouldn't be surprised however, if the
Hi Chaotic Inflation
There is indeed a positive association between TCAs and suicide,
(how strong it doesn't say) but otherwise there is a negative association.
I wouldn't be surprised however, if there was a positive association for ALL
antidepressants,
as they don't work perfectly anyway.
25 matches
Mail list logo