On 09 May 2014, at 02:22, LizR wrote:
On 9 May 2014 05:07, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 08 May 2014, at 00:35, LizR wrote:
(By the way I think Max Tegmark does a good job of explaining what
this means in his book, even if he doesn't get to the reversal. He
says you need to assume a "capsule th
On 9 May 2014 14:06, John Ross wrote:
> I am a patent attorney. During the past 13 years I have documented my
> theory at eight times in its development by filing patent applications
> attempting to patent process for modeling things like electrons. My
> applications have been repeatedly reject
I am a patent attorney. During the past 13 years I have documented my theory
at eight times in its development by filing patent applications attempting to
patent process for modeling things like electrons. My applications have been
repeatedly rejected by the USPTO. However, they have in the p
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 06:03:49PM -0700, John Ross wrote:
> My theory does not violate conservation of mass-energy. It does not deal
> with Lepton number. How do you know neutrinos have a Lepton number of 1?
> How do you know neutrinos exists? Have you ever seen one? I don’t believe
> neut
So anyway, what is your reasoning? So far you have only supplied blanket
statements such as "A tronnie is a point particle with a charge of plus e
or minus e.". What premises did you start from, and what logical steps have
led you to think the world is built in the way described by your theory?
--
Thanks for your thoughts.
A tronnie is a point particle with a charge of plus e or minus e. This
means that each tronnie is a source of the Coulomb force. The Coulomb force
travels at the speed of light. Tronnies attract unlike tronnies and repel
like tronnies because of their charge of e.
On 9 May 2014 13:05, meekerdb wrote:
> On 5/8/2014 5:22 PM, LizR wrote:
>
> On 9 May 2014 05:07, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>>
>> On 08 May 2014, at 00:35, LizR wrote:
>> (By the way I think Max Tegmark does a good job of explaining what this
>> means in his book, even if he doesn't get to the re
Ah - do you mean that a collision of three entrons gives rise to a
positon-electron pair creation?
How does that describe the observed positron-electron pair creation
from a pair of photons? Are photons composed of 3 tronnies as well?
Cheers
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 05:32:46PM -0700, John Ross wr
On 9 May 2014 13:15, John Ross wrote:
> Of course there is gravity. Gravity is produce in Black Holes which
> consume a portion of its galaxy to produce proton-antiproton annihilations
> which releases the neutrino entrons in both particles. These neutrino
> entrons ultimately exit the Black Ho
On 9 May 2014 13:03, John Ross wrote:
> My understanding is that current scientific thinking has our Universe
> expanding to 40 % of its current size in a very short time period. This
> sounds like something was traveling faster than the speed of light. My
> book contains a good explanation for
Of course there is gravity. Gravity is produce in Black Holes which consume a
portion of its galaxy to produce proton-antiproton annihilations which releases
the neutrino entrons in both particles. These neutrino entrons ultimately exit
the Black Holes to provide the gravity holding the galaxy
On 5/8/2014 5:22 PM, LizR wrote:
On 9 May 2014 05:07, Bruno Marchal mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be>> wrote:
On 08 May 2014, at 00:35, LizR wrote:
(By the way I think Max Tegmark does a good job of explaining what this
means in his
book, even if he doesn't get to the reversal. He says you
My theory does not violate conservation of mass-energy. It does not deal with
Lepton number. How do you know neutrinos have a Lepton number of 1? How do
you know neutrinos exists? Have you ever seen one? I don’t believe neutrinos
exist. I have never seen proof that they exist. Do you have
So anyway, what is your reasoning? What premises and logical steps led you
to think the world is built this way?
On 9 May 2014 12:39, John Ross wrote:
> A 928 MeV photon is a very high energy photon. It is off the scale of
> every chart I have ever seen of the electric magnetic spectrum. Why
A 928 MeV photon is a very high energy photon. It is off the scale of every
chart I have ever seen of the electric magnetic spectrum. Why don’t you send
me your chart showing your 500 GeV photon.
John R.
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com]
Three entrons are comprised of a total of six tronnies. An electron and a
positron together comprise six tronnnies.
The electron and the positron are each comprised of three tronnies. I could
have been more precise.
John R
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
On 9 May 2014 05:07, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 08 May 2014, at 00:35, LizR wrote:
> (By the way I think Max Tegmark does a good job of explaining what this
> means in his book, even if he doesn't get to the reversal. He says you need
> to assume a "capsule theory of memory" and talks about obse
...or if that's God, barking in the quad.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group,
On 5/8/2014 2:51 PM, LizR wrote:
Why does this sort of thing never work for me? It's almost like a higher power is
determined to stop me. OK, let's try again...
(Or does God lie awake at nights wondering where HE came from?)
Q: What's a dyslexic agnostic insomniac?
A: Someone who lies awa
I'd just like to check that this isn't an elaborate hoax. (You aren't Edgar
Owen in disguise, I hope?)
I think you need to start your explanation from whatever basic principles
you started from, and explain how you reached your conclusions. Just saying
"the universe works THIS way" and expecting e
Why does this sort of thing never work for me? It's almost like a higher
power is determined to stop me. OK, let's try again...
(Or does God lie awake at nights wondering where HE came from?)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group
On 08 May 2014, at 17:46, John Ross wrote:
I have math to prove that the integrated Coulomb forces between the
two tronnies in an entron, one +e and one -e, traveling in a circle
at (pi/2)c exactly cancel in the diametrical direction. The entron
can have any size from 0.9339 X 10-18 m to
On 08 May 2014, at 18:52, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/8/2014 6:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 May 2014, at 17:39, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-05-07 17:20 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal :
On 07 May 2014, at 11:41, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-05-07 11:13 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal :
On 06 May 201
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 9:56:44 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 07 May 2014, at 21:55, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 6, 2014 8:53:54 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 05 May 2014, at 21:38, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, May 5, 2014 10:26:27 AM UTC-4, Brun
JR: The Coulomb force also provides the gravity holding galaxies together.
RR: What, there is not even gravity in your theory?
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:56 PM, John Ross wrote:
> There is nothing wrong with the standard model and relativity theories.
> The question is are they perfect? The othe
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:25 PM, John Ross wrote:
> The neutrino photon disappears in the course of pair production.
>
First of all there is no such thing as a " neutrino photon". Second of all
one photon all by itself never turns into a electron and a positron, you
need 2 photons or a photon int
The neutrino photon disappears in the course of pair production. When the
positron created in pair production combines with an electron and they are
annihilated a neutrino photon is released in the process. So there is
conservation of mass-energy. Also there are six tronnies in the three phot
On 08 May 2014, at 00:35, LizR wrote:
On 6 May 2014 06:54, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Craig, Liz, Brent and/or anyone interested,
Again, it is just an attempt. Take it easy. I have to train myself,
and a bit yourself.
You might tell me if this helps, if only a little bit.
OK...
*** (it is als
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 11:45:32 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Craig Weinberg
>
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, May 8, 2014 9:40:58 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>>>
>>>
There is nothing wrong with the standard model and relativity theories. The
question is are they perfect? The other question is: Is there a better theory?
Congratulations to you for looking at my summary at Amazon.com. I assume you
saw my quote from Stephen Hawking’s Book, The Theory o
On 5/8/2014 6:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 07 May 2014, at 17:39, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-05-07 17:20 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be>>:
On 07 May 2014, at 11:41, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-05-07 11:13 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be>>
On 07 May 2014, at 21:55, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, May 6, 2014 8:53:54 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 05 May 2014, at 21:38, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, May 5, 2014 10:26:27 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Then you can study how to define sequence in that theory.
Only bec
On 07 May 2014, at 17:39, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-05-07 17:20 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal :
On 07 May 2014, at 11:41, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-05-07 11:13 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal :
On 06 May 2014, at 20:22, ghib...@gmail.com wrote:
But you do not ever make a hard predic
(sorry if you get that mail twice. problem mails, coming from the
provider now. This was answered thursday morning)
On 07 May 2014, at 17:39, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-05-07 17:20 GMT+02:00 Bruno Marchal :
On 07 May 2014, at 11:41, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2014-05-07 11:13 GMT+02:00
The neutrino entron disappears in pair production, but it reappears in
annihilation. There is no violation of conservation of energy!
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 8:09 PM
To: everything-list@g
To answer your question: A neutrino photon is a neutrino entron traveling in
a circle at a speed of 2c and forward at a speed of c; just like every other
photon is an entron traveling in a circle at a speed of 2c and forward at a
speed of c.
The electrons, positrons, protons alpha particles are ju
I have math to prove that the integrated Coulomb forces between the two
tronnies in an entron, one +e and one –e, traveling in a circle at (pi/2)c
exactly cancel in the diametrical direction. The entron can have any size from
0.9339 X 10-18 m to a few centimeters. My entrons are the basic ma
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, May 8, 2014 9:40:58 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>>
>>
>>> In this -single universe- context, the fine tuning of the physical
>>> constants are miracles
On Thursday, May 8, 2014 9:40:58 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Alberto G. Corona
>
> > wrote:
>
>
>> In this -single universe- context, the fine tuning of the physical
>> constants are miracles by the way, so the hypothesis is true.
>>
>
> I tend to
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:18 PM, John Ross wrote:
> I must say however that I am not aware of any portion of my theory that
> is at odds with observation.
>
Then I can only conclude that you're not aware of much, especially
elementary physics. You say "my theory does not include the old fashion
n
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
> Any theory that stand over non intelligent axioms has to accept an
> infinity of multiverses, That may be refined, taking into account
> information=0 etc, but I will not go further on that.
>
I would say that the anthropic principle all
Any theory that stand over non intelligent axioms has to accept an infinity
of multiverses, That may be refined, taking into account information=0
etc, but I will not go further on that.
That multiverse must include among other things the universes with gods ,
and the universes with goods that h
What if God is a Boltzmann Brain? He is likely not, but what they heck, it's a
shot at looking at the issue from another angle. Another thought, is thing of
the Big Mind (shrug) as doing the multiverse using the Schrodinger universal
wave function, and allow me to use hugh evertt the 3rd's inte
> On 8 May 2014, at 3:09 pm, LizR wrote:
>
> As hopefully the above will demonstrate, if I managed to upload the picture...
Apparently not.
Kim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop recei
44 matches
Mail list logo
