Need to back level a service pack on my nt4.0 sp6a exchange system.. Need
to go back to SP5 on NT4.0.
Is there a simple and easy way to do this? Didn't make copies of the files
whe we went to 6a. Why! When I
restoer my exchange server priv pub I get alot of database problems since
my
Not an answer to your question, but maybe useful?
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q224977
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backing off a Service Pack
I have a user in our Virginia office who cannot get into his email. When
he tries to resolve his name, he gets the error message the Exchange
Address Book cannot resolve his name. I've tried recreating his mailbox,
I've tried renaming his alias, nothing has worked. I even tried to get
him to go
I've designed a form based off of the standard Message (IPM.Note) form. I
have added both a custom large and small icon. But when I use the form, the
icon DOES NOT show up; it is still the usual 'envelope' icon.
What am I doing wrong?!?!
--Omar
Omar A.
Thanks, atleast it give me something to work with...
Ron
-Original Message-
From: O'Conner, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backing off a Service Pack
Not an answer to your question, but maybe useful?
Hi there
what is a .idx and .ldx file?
Kim
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They're for querying the MS index server.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT idx
Hi there
what is a .idx and .ldx file?
Kim
Hi all
My boss was asking a question I'm not too sure about. If the virus is being
stripped, how is it able to open Windows Media Player??
I can't seem to find an answer with either McAfee or Symantec.
Thanks
Russell
_
List
try the virus removal tool on his PC !!!
-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 April, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: W32 Klez - how does it open windows media player
Hi all
My boss was asking a question I'm not too sure about. If
The payload may be stripped, but the exploit is still contained in the HTML
code of the e-mail. The media player loads, but there is nothing to run.
You need to apply the Microsoft patch for IE that removes the vulnerability.
--jim
-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL
Yes. Hire Daniel.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT idx
the pagefile.sys is about 550 MB, is there a way to make that smaller?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis
the pagefile.sys is about 550 MB, is there a way to make that smaller?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 April, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT idx
They're for querying the MS index server.
-Original Message-
From:
Can I delete those files (I have a list of about two years... I urgently
need more space on that server...
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 April, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT idx
They're for querying the MS index server.
Hi
There is a problem where i am at of users can attach and read other
users email. They don't have Domain Admin rights(some of them do as far as
workgroup managers). Is there a way to fix this.
Thanks
_
List posting FAQ:
Yes.
more answers will require more info.
--steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email Accounts
Hi
There is a problem where i am at of users can attach and
If you upgraded exchange 5.5 to exchange 2000, you may have an issue with the everyone
group having read rights. You need to use ADSI edit to change the right at the
topmost container, so that it isn't inherited by your entire organization.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What Exchange rights do these users have? Do they by chance have user
rights to the mailbox? Have they been given delegate rights by the mailbox
owner?
Do any of these users have Site Service account rights to the Private
Information store? Can they read everyone's mail or only select users?
As you will notice the virus only opens on windows media player 7. To stop
the html imbedded code from opening windows media player you can do two
things.
1. go to internet options and put your security on high.
2. you can go to windows media player 7 options then go to extensions tab
and
What did the system admin say?
- Original Message -
From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:57 AM
Subject: RE: OT idx
the pagefile.sys is about 550 MB, is there a way to make that smaller?
-Original
Good question? Guess it wouldn't be a problem.. It is however from my 1st
server in the site - guess I would just install ex 5.5 and say it's a new
site with the same site name - rebuild my site connector with the other
site. Seems easy!! Do you see any problems with doing it that way?
Just
For some reason your form is becoming a one-off form. You either
1. didn't publish the form to a public folder or organization forms library
2. are doing some creative coding on the form that causes it to become a
one-off form
3. are changing properties of the form while you're sending it that
Why not write a vbscript using CDO?
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Brett Wesoloski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 5:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: e-mail to draft box
Well lets say outlook2K. With using the shell32 it uses the default
we are using exchange5.5., and they do not have service account rights and
yes they can read everyones email, and they don't have user rights to
other peoples mailbox.
_
List posting FAQ:
Oh, but they do.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Email Accounts
we are using exchange5.5., and they do not have service account rights and
yes they can read everyones
If I am not mistaken the problem you're having might very well be down to
the fact that your using a Native Windows 2000 or exchange 2000
environment. You made it native which means its not compatible with
down-leve systems. Hence, why it aint connecting.
-Original Message-
From: Mark
Do you have a preferred tool for monitoring bandwidth usage?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:34 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Min Bandwidth requirements for E5.5 Clients
My rule
Hi all,
We're using Exch 2K and Outlook 2002 with SP2.
We have incoming mail sifted into public folders based on the email
address people are writing to. Those people are then supposed to get an
auto reply when the email hits the public folder. Various people in the
company would be able to
Here's a better idea: get the patch from MS that fixes the vulnerability -
see Q290108.
James Winzenz, MCSE, A+
Associate Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:41 AM
To:
MRTG
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Min Bandwidth requirements for E5.5 Clients
Do you have a preferred tool for monitoring bandwidth usage?
-Original Message-
In Exchange admin, do Tools:Options:Permissions and check the top two boxes.
Get properties on a user and go to the Permissions tab. What accounts show
here with what rights?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 22,
Where is the rule written? I'm guessing your using a combo of client side
and PF rules
- Original Message -
From: Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 7:18 PM
Subject: Auto replies using Rules in Folder Assistant
Hi all,
I have 4 routing groups. 2 are pure 5.5 servers. 1 is mixed. 1 is pure
exch2k. Should I set routing group connectors up to all groups from the
pure exch2k group?
Thanks.
_
List posting FAQ:
You are mistaken - we have already discussed that Native mode has nothing to
do with it.
-
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Abdi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Are you using a template to reply?
From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2002/04/22 Mon AM 11:05:52 EDT
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Auto replies using Rules in Folder Assistant
Where is the rule written? I'm guessing your using a combo of client side
and
My exchange server is also a BDC and is the only one left in my W2K
environment. It is keeping me from
going to native mode. Anyone ever use a product called UPROMOTE to
un-promote a bdc to a member server?
This is the 1st server in my exchange site, so I can just replace it - guess
I could
They certainly do have service account rights. There is no other way
for it to work
Check your group memberships in the domain
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:51 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Don't use a product like Upromote in a production environment.
Upgrade or rebuild.
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:27 AM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Going Native for W2K
Subject: Going
Once I upgrade it, then I can can go native mode. But, I will need to
replace it with newer hardware as I continue to move to E2K. Guess as long
as it is the last server (ex 5.5 server)
I replace - I'll not have a problem...
Anyone have any problems when they did the upgrade option for a w2k
I'd beg to differ, if they are getting into everyone's mailbox, they DO HAVE
site service persmissions.Better check those permissions again.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: Email
Hi
Well you was right , they did have site dervice permissions, come to
find out some one has changed the rights a week ago, and used an
administrative account and we found out who the administrator wa. Thank
everyone for your feedback.
Hi there
Thanks very much for all the valuable input. I appreciate it.
Here's the interesting thing:
This lists the problem for IE 5.x. I have IE 6 and the problem still
occured!! Oh well
Thanks
Russell
-Original Message-
From: James Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Tener?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Email Accounts
Hi
Well you was right , they did have site dervice permissions, come to
find out some one has changed the rights a
According to the new edition of Woody's Office Watch IE 6 can have this
vulnerability if you run Win 98 or upgraded to IE6 with minimal option.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Now, if I may...
When this was first suggested as the only likely possibility you said it
couldn't be right.
Something I learned a long time ago: if I'm asking questions I'm not in the
right place to be questioning the answers.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Sounds like a plan!
- Original Message -
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:42 AM
Subject: RE: Backing off a Service Pack
Good question? Guess it wouldn't be a problem.. It is however from my
1st
nope wasnt me
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 12:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Accounts
Tener?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002
Interesting...
I ran the full IE 6, and I'm running Windows 2000. I give up.
Thanks for your assistance
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W32 Klez - how does it open
Like Stephen said, I wouldn't go the UPROMOTE route. Instead, build a
windows 2000 member server in the NT 4 domain and install Exchange 5.5 ,
make it the second server in the site. Use the Ed Crowley move server
method and then follow the steps to remove the first server from the site.
Matt
I had him try to access OWA from another PC. I don't know how that went,
since I finally got him through OWA on his PC. Yes, it's a name
resolution problem for the Outlook client.
I've reinstalled Outlook, I've deleted the profiles he had listed and
tried to manully create a new one, I've
We have those problems from time to time at the university and it
usually turns out to be network or profile issues. Since you have
recreated his profile, try to build him a profile on another box and try
it there.
You need to know if OWA works for him or not (assuming it works for
everyone
What do you expect from someone who posts to a technical forum as Jazzy11
Daniel??
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Email Accounts
Now, if I may...
When this was first
Actually running in a windows 2000 environment - all my other servers have
been upgrade and this is the only server keeping me from going to Native
mode. Since, I need to be in native mode to
ensure that the permissions, DL's and public folders are OK when I add my
exchange 2000 server.
Ron
U... I expect his friend to be FreshPrice11
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:20 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: Email Accounts
Subject: RE: Email Accounts
What do you expect from someone who
Oh my.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT idx
the pagefile.sys is about 550 MB, is there a way to make that smaller?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Levis [mailto:[EMAIL
Lori.Hunter? Like that's your real name...
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 2:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Accounts
What do you expect from someone who posts to a technical
forum as Jazzy11
Bah!
Install another (member) server as Win2k and then migrate to E2k
Then remove the old E5.5 server
Not as easy as it sounds, but probably your best route given what you
are describing
I'll never do an inplace upgrade to E2k unless I have no other
option And I will always have another
Oh, everyone knows that you use WinZip to do that!
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:23 PM
Posted To: Exchange Discussion List
Conversation: OT idx
Subject: RE: OT idx
Oh my.
-Original Message-
From: Kim
I usually just rename those files, r they important?
Yours truly,
Freshprince11
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT idx
Oh, everyone knows that you use WinZip to do that!
I suppose that it isn't real in the Platonic sense wherein all things are
but representations of an unseen ideal rather like shadows on the wall, but
Lori a mere shadow? Clearly Erik needs a trip to the Ask the Experts
booth at the next MEC.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka
Or a trip to the bar with the rest of us...
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 14:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Accounts
I suppose that it isn't real in the Platonic sense wherein all things are
but
Actually I've had great success with Fdisk.
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mynhier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 2:35 PM
Subject: RE: OT idx
Oh, everyone knows that you use WinZip to do that!
-Original Message-
Do they serve beer there?
And it's spelled Axe. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 2:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Accounts
I suppose that it isn't real in the Platonic sense wherein
all
Or trip on the way out of the bar like the rest of us...
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Accounts
Or a trip to the bar with the rest of us...
-Original Message-
Is it possible to get a list of all established SMTP connections. Our
q-mail server was getting dropped connections and I wasn't able to get a
reason why exchange was dropping them.
Info: NT 4.0 SP 6a, Exchange 5.5 SP4
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
Okay, guys I need some help here, an e-mail was just forward to me from one
of my HelpDesk guys. An internal user was sent an e-mail from another
internal user, but the From line doesn't show the Exchange name. it shows
the SMTP address, and the first part of the smtp address. In the sent line
Why are you convinced that something is wrong?
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 12:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Accounts
Okay, guys I need some help here, an e-mail was just forward to me from one
of my
Because of the fact that this is now running rampant through my exchange
site. It appears an outside site has been sending this crap all day.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Do you have relaying turned off?
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
e-mail disclaimer
I was having problems where I couldn't get external mail so currently have
it set up that way. It appears to be a virus problem, we have been infected
by another domain.
-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:12 PM
To: Exchange
Ah, well your first note did not hint at that.
So, it sounds like mail is being sent using a valid smtp string, and that
perhaps the address line is not the to field but oen of the two copy fields.
Most such things are not attacks, but rather accidents. This sounds like an
automailer script
maybe its the worm_klez.g virus sending out as these people.
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Email Accounts
Ah, well your first note did not hint at that.
So, it sounds like
Okay, a user of mine received a message from another user with the title
below.
Hi,Bbarrow,japanese girl VS playboy
It automatically tries to download something, but it says the site doesn't
work. Has anyone heard of this, and if so what kind of virus is it.
Chris Callan
My bet is on the playboy
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 3:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus Question
Okay, a user of mine received a message from another user with the title
below.
Hi,Bbarrow,japanese girl VS
WORM_KLEZ.G
http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_KLEZ.G
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus Question
Okay, a user of mine received
Better question. Why is the user trying to open this at all??
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 1:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Virus Question
Okay, a user of mine received a message from another user with the
Hi
Can Diskeeper defrag an exchange server or not ?
Must we exlude or not the exchange database Folder ?
I heard opposites answers to that... From MS and from IT's also
I would like to install Diskeeper on my next installation and was wondering
if it can help the server running faster, if I
NO!!! NEVER run any DEFAG on anything EXCHANGE.. Period. It runs it's
own defrag online.
--Kevinm TSSSBE, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
The second SMTP address, which is actually the address used by incoming messages to
Custom Recipients, should go in the field, Secondary-Proxy-Addresses. The external
address, to which messages will be relayed, goes where the regular SMTP address would
normally be.
-Peter
-Original
Hi
I am testing the migration to Exchange 2k from 5.5 in a test suite.
I have Server1 which is the AD root. Server2 has Exchange5.5 SP4 installed.
We have already migrated our users to W2k using ADMT, but still using
Exch5.5.
In my test suite I installed ADC off the E2k CD on Server2.
Hi all,
I just installed a new EX5.5 server and the store.exe will NOT use all
available memmory. :-(
Config: IBM box with 3 CPU, 3GB RAM, RAID1 for c:\, (os) RAID1 for
d:\(swap), RAID1 for e:\ (logs) and RAID5 for f:\ (db).
More than 1000 users. I have the /3GB switch in boot.ini. Store.exe
store.exe will use the lesser of all available memory and all the memory it
needs.
Give it time. :o)
William
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Store.exe memmory usage
Hi all,
I
I did. Over the last week I moved over 500 users to this box and the memory
use was steady at 900MB.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 7:30 PM
Subject: RE: Store.exe memmory usage
Did you run the Optimizer on it? After moving so many, you defiently should.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Store.exe memmory usage
I did. Over the last week I moved over 500
Yes, I did and planning to do it again in 10 minutes.
/Peter
- Original Message -
From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 7:46 PM
Subject: RE: Store.exe memmory usage
Did you run the Optimizer on it? After
It uses the amount it needs.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 6:27 PM
Subject: Store.exe memmory usage
Hi all,
I just installed a new EX5.5 server and the store.exe will NOT use all
Let's get this straight once and for all...
Diskeeper does a file-level defrag of the hard-drive. It does not touch what
is inside the files, just gathers the fragments together.
Exchange databases do get fragmented, but _internally_ to their structure.
Diskeeper will not touch that
Daniel (thanks)
Ok so we don't defrag Ex Database
Do you still use Diskeeper on servers you install to speed up the server ?
JF
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 8:11 PM
Subject: Re:
Daniel,
Correct as always, however.
You can shut down the exchange services (which obviously affects Exchange
availability) and perform a Diskeeper defrag on the volumes if the exchange
databases are shared with other files. This will organise the files in a
contiguous manner, including the
Thanks Glen...Good point
but can Diskeeper do a good job to try to defrag an on line exchange
server ?
Not all ex server have their database on a stand alone partition or disk.
Sometime this list is like MS exam, we're supposed everyone are dealing with
10 servers, 2000 users etc ;-)
A lot
I always try to answer with an eye towards availability and give an answer,
if possible, in that context. ;)
If you do need to use the spindle for something other than Exchange, use it
for infrequently-accessed-but-needed files, preferably ones that won't grow
much, if at all. If you do this
Are there any hotfixes or patches recommended for Win2k running Exchange
2000 Sp2?
Leo
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
Yes. Every single one for which you are experiences the symptoms outlined
in the related Q article.
William
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 6:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: What hotfixes/patches after Sp2?
Are there any
William, thanks for your reply but what I am looking for is a list of post
Exchange SP2 patches that may need applying regardless of whether we are
seeing any errors. For example security patches that plug holes that we
may have and don't know about etc.
Leo
Hi Everyone,
I've just added a new server to an Exchange 5.5 site and am getting
the following error message (below). I've got Service pack 4 on both servers
and everything looks OK at face value. Mind you I'm no Exchange guru.
The server referred to in the message is the original Exchange
Mapi clients can only see one top level Public folder.
The question that strike me as interesting is how does the MAPI user get
to see any replicated public folders that are from another top level
public folder then ?
Leo
_
List
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/BestConfig.as
p
Steve Evans
Computing Services
SDSU Foundation
619 594-0653
-Original Message-
From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 8:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: What
Coulda swore I answered this last week. Archives no workee?
In x.400 parlance a bind is the process whereby two MTAs exchange security
information. Basically it's a login failure.Same site and same domain?
- Original Message -
From: Tony McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
97 matches
Mail list logo
