Looks like someone's volunteering to demonstrate the effects of MAILSTORM...
-Original Message-
From: Troels Majlandt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 15:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SV: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics AGAIN MORE SPAM
AGAIN
Looks like someone's volunteering to demonstrate the effects of MAILSTORM...
-Original Message-
From: Troels Majlandt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 15:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SV: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics AGAIN MORE SPAM
AGAIN
However, if you absolutely must persist with this bloody stupid way of doing
things, here's a reghack for the server that'll do what you need it to do.
It was originally pointed to me by the below Mr. Webb's lovely wife... :)
Oh, the text below says HKLM. Put it in HKCU as well, same tree path.
Good to see the standards here are the same as always.
-Original Message-
From: vex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 15:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Scheduled service shutdowns?
Greetings,
2K Server, Exchange Server 5.5SP4.
I'm trying to figure out
Observation:
Messages in my Exch-Swynk folder since 2003-01-15: 8278
Posts from Ben Winzenz, mostly answering questions: 68
Posts from Mitchell Lawrence, just attacking Ben: 4
'nuff said.
-Original Message-
From: Lawrence, Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21,
We care because you're a time wasting, freebie wanting, idiot.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 August 2003 10:17
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
Thanks Tony for your advice.
Why do you
That is a clear indication that you at least need to learn to read the
bloody help file.
Gary
PS: No, in your case, the longer, the better. The lights may be on, but
there is definately nobody home.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 August
guy..probably some geek, nerd with no friends!
LOL
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
We care because you're a time wasting
: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 10:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
We care because you're a time wasting, freebie wanting, idiot.
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL
by being
the best at a computer software.
Get a life.looser boy!!!
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
We can debate my geek, nerd
at a computer software.
Get a life.looser boy!!!
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 11:28 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server
We can debate my geek, nerd or friends status some
Breeze? Is that one of your ships?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:32 AM
To: Exchange
Um...
The problem with doing this, as I said below - is that Cisco's UM
doesn't support secondary authentication, so I do what I'd originally
planned, which is, make a secondary mailbox for voice and just have
people attach to it; it has to be the primary account people are
logged in as,
No Gary, we are not talking about Bahama Breeze.
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni
fied Messaging
Um...
The problem
differently in your environment?
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco
Uni fied Messaging
Um...
The problem with doing this, as I
It's called research. You'll notice that he also posts under his own
name...
-Original Message-
From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 6:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters
Oh man, you must keep that RFC
-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 July 2003 04:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
(Can't resist - it's a 4-node cluster, with a passive same-scale server as
part of the mix g).
Which is 4,000 per node... Sounding reasonable to me so
(Can't resist - it's a 4-node cluster, with a passive same-scale server as
part of the mix g).
Which is 4,000 per node... Sounding reasonable to me so far...
Oh, and if anyone's wondering if it's real world or Microsoft/HP playing
- yes, I'm seriously considering (and have the budget to back
per the slides. 4-1-2. Not 5-1-2.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger,
Gary
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
OK, I'll try it another way
But better yet, don't ? Don't we get enough garbage in emails as it is,
without having HTML logos shoved down our throats on (presumably) every
message?
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 08:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Yes, thanks. I even know how to read a FAQ and search with google.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 16:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 default signature for all email mailboxes
Anyone know how to make a
The TechEd PPT was 4-1-2; other than that, concur.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Clustering... is it worth it?
Definitely Active/Passive.
The 8-node cluster I mentioned it
+1+2 8
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Clustering... is it worth it?
The TechEd PPT was 4-1-2; other than that, concur.
-Original Message
I was hoping to set it up and move a couple mailboxes over to it to start
playing with it.
Uh huh... Yeah. We ordinarily call that a lab.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:59 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange
If the machine isn't a laptop, there's no real reason for Offline Folders
anyway
Disagree. All of my power users where I am now, and every other
customer job I've worked on, has OST's setup for desktops. Allows a server
to be pulled with less impact on them (it does happen from time to
Let me think of an appropriate response: get stuffed. Your analogy is
inane and irrelevant.
I'm describing a real-world situation - he's lost the server a couple of
times; he's never lost data. Why should he spend the extra cash for a
backup solution that he wouldn't use? [1]
[1] Disclaimer:
They're supposed to be that size. Look it up (Technet)
Take a complete, Exchange backup. That'll get rid of them. Look it up.
(FAQ)
Delete stuff. The stores are the stores are the stores...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24,
Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this
sort of thing.
Depends on jurisdiction.
-Original Message-
From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 07:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Before you start looking at your users mail
Email content
Sure does but I'd rather have someone elses butt on the line than mine,
especially if 'm doing it for them anyway. I'm intrigued - where is phone
tapping legal?
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 June 2003 12:39
To: Exchange Discussions
The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them
is a different thing altogether.
Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of
it depends.
-Original Message-
From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003
:55
To: Exchange Discussions
I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of
anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal?
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51
To: Exchange Discussions
. Give me an example of
anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal?
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Monitor Email content
The emails might be the companies property
way you can tell whether
you are being asked to do something which you should do without contravening
your terms of employment.
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 June 2003 15:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Monitor Email content
Florida
: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:19
To: Exchange Discussions
I've just spent the last couple of months doing this so I guess it's all
still buzzing round. Apologies. We also elected for minimum HR and line
manager approval.
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23
user knows about it. That's the only way
you can tell whether you are being asked to do something which you
should do without contravening your terms of employment.
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 June 2003 15:57
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Monitor Email content
Um, whereas I'm considering studying law now just for the hell of
it...
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23
Best is a variable concept. Stand behind them and watch what they send
and receive could be a valid answer.
What have you looked into so far?
-Original Message-
From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 6:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I have been
The delete key works wonders.
-Original Message-
From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 13:34
To: Exchange Discussions
I'm curious... How do you keep the size of the mailboxes down?
-Original Message-
From: Public Folder: Exchange
UTC's French. GMT'll do g
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 17:45
To: Exchange Discussions
I thought they were in UTC.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked
.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IIS
Um, no, but thanks for playing. He's talking about OUTBOUND NDR's, not
where internal notifications go...
-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 14:57
To: Exchange Discussions
You can configure NDR' from the IMS Properties.. Look
Yeah, that was me...
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 10:12
To: Exchange Discussions
I didn't get to attend because of the Kansas Budget Crisis, but I can still
bet that the #1 thing overheard was:'
Where's the Beer?
Bob
You have to be THIS tall to ride the...
Oh, wait - wrong thread :)
-Original Message-
From: Van Hooser, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 5:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
But does it come with Scharff in box?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From:
Roger posted a perfectly valid solution approach - have you tried that, or
are you so blinded by your presumption that you've found a bug?
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules
I can't get rules after it to work. - well, that is kinda the point of
that particular rule option.
-Original Message-
From: Scoles, Damian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 16:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rules Wizard Issue
Tried this and it makes
Google is your friend... Search phrases like 'SEC Compiant email' aren't
that hard to conjure.
OK, I'll play nice:
http://www.tumbleweed.com/en/industries/financial_services/
http://www.optical.com/
You could probably configure http://www.ixos.com or http://www.kvault.com to
meet the needs as
Don't confuse the synchronisation of offline files with the synchronisation
of an OST to an Exchange store. He was having problems with the former.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 13:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re:
better than you! ;o)
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 10:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
If you'd like to burn any other part of you
PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Hummert, you incompetent little piece of pond scum, did it occur to you to
actually run a real google search, such as rbl email
The prophet of http://www.goatse.cx/hello.jpg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Hummert, you incompetent little piece of pond scum
Hummert, you incompetent little piece of pond scum, did it occur to you to
actually run a real google search, such as rbl email definition? Comes
up on the first page you arrogant little pillow muncher. See? You want to
throw shit around on the list? There's plenty of folk that can come on out
To the why should I show part - have you read the FAQ, or is that beneath
you, brainfart?
Shouldn't everyone check the web and the MS KB...? Why yes, yes they
should you moron, that's why it's in the freakin' FAQ! Oh, wait... That
presumes that you're competent enough to read the FSCKING
Yes, they were.
But they didn't learn by being public incompetents.
-Original Message-
From: Bryon Barkley [mailto:lablvr;cox.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 21:06
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Here Here Gregory! I couldn't said it better myself. Some people
That's OK, buddy. You just sit around and let other people do your job for
you. we don't have the time to learn everything there is to know about
Exchange administration. Yeah, I'm a big fan of begging, bludging, and
otherwise taking advantage of other people's time, skills and knowledge.
Change their passwords?
OK, I'll play nice - Q295067, 262902, 190433, 236909 or 238444. You figure
out which one is right - I don't want to.
Observations: You know it was asked recently, but you don't have messages
you could have searched? Or the archives? And, while I can draw an
assumption
Just as well. If there was, your sorry little ass would be at the top of
any do not employ, do not assist and do not associate with lists that
might not allegedly exist.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 15:18
To:
Got education? Learn the difference between u and you.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 16:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: custom NDR?
Got money ? Get MS to consult for u.
-Original Message-
From:
I suspect you'll find that (a) Ed knows more than your tiny little mind can
comprehend, and (b) had you tested and then posted the results of those
tests, you'd get far more responsive answers, instead of which you sit back
and expect others to do your work for them, and then attempt to
, dead on target. Rapier wit.
I rate this answer at 5 pink sundresses. Well done, Gary. What are your
plans for following up on this critical success?
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 10:43
Yep.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 17:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MEC early registration
Looks like maybe not as many people registered yet as they had hoped?
Anyone one of the first 1000 to get a
No, we prefer to call it incompetence.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 18:10
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How to configure SMTP/POP for home users
Don't smoke, don't drink, don't do drugs. Maybe it's the heat.
Awww, shit, Aristotle doesn't like the tone of the list. I guess I'll have
to leave now, and read one of those lists that I pay for. Oh...
waidaminnit
Prat.
-Original Message-
From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 21:05
To: Exchange
was such a foreign concept to
him, the idea of a DL with no recipients as a solution to bouncing mail is
hardly a self-apparent one. When I first lit upon the concept, I must say I
was quite startled by its simplicity.
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
Per 1, that kinda goes to the original purpose of this list. You were kinda
expected to know that stuff before you showed up here. But that's clearly
shot to hell.
Per 3, bullshit.
Per 4, Not relevant to the conversation.
It pains me to defend Woodruff given his previous (lack of)
Great... not even noon on Monday and we've got a winner already for I
can't read the manual or the help files...
-Original Message-
From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 11:16
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re Outlook2K
Hi all,
I noticed on
Discussions
Subject: RE: Re Outlook2K
Is this really necessary?
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 June 2002 11:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re Outlook2K
Great... not even noon on Monday and we've got a winner already for I
can't read
be judgement enough for you.
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 June 2002 12:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re Outlook2K
I felt so, yes. Was it really necessary for you to post to several thousand
admins about (a) an Outlook issue which
coughbullshit/cough
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 15:56
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Re Outlook2K
But, Martin, that is NOT the way it worked in earlier versions of Outlook.
You would get repeated OOO
Hotmail is also about to pull the POP3 service for their free users.
G.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 17:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: slightly OT - Outlook and IE
I still like Yahoo, especially when I'm away and
.
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Of course it is - what's to stop me removing your disclaimer before I send
it onwards to someone else, and then challenging you to PROVE
we do.
Besides which, I don't enjoy being publicly flogged. Agreeing with you is
the best way to avoid that.
Darcy
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
See
But very little that is discussed after you've got that CD won't already
have been discussed at some point in the archives, which you will then have
the ability to search. And the information that isn't in the archives,
well, you'll have your current subscription to the list to refer to, and
The more succinct version of what I just said. Note to self: go practice
terseness...
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 17:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Searching the archives
Duh! That's sort of the nature of
a) Refer to EdC's standard reply about behavioral problems and technological
solutions.
b) Expand the security log. 10Mb Pah! Get a copy of Event Log Monitor
or similar, and use that for your reporting.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
If you don't like it, ask for your money back. What other list servers do
is irrelevant. The way this list works is the way it works. And it's
worked pretty damn well in various forms for several years now.
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
is void if it is legally found to be a pyramid scheme. Can I
play dumb or somehow exempt because of my disclaimer? I don't think so. In
fact, I think the disclaimer is tantamount to a confession.
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06
If you mean HIPAA, would you care to quote the parts about disclaimers?
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 20:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
We are going to start putting disclaimers on emails
Archives.
-Original Message-
From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 21:41
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: How to prevent end users from using Outlook personal folders pst
Subject says it all. I know I can remove the mspst32.dll. But is there
Um, Jon? You posted your experience the other day. I don't think you get
to comment on large enterprises and 4 or 5 nine's with only 1 to 3
servers in a site... You missed it, but I was being sarcastic when I asked
for your experience with storage management. Your response kinda proved my
The Backup Agent works fine. I use it everyday. You just haven't
configured it properly. Useful to you? Probably not, but as valid a
comment as your initial pointless and gratuitous comment about Microsoft.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
The idea of you constantly referring to hippa doesn't make me happy.
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 22:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
I don't think it would hold up either I'm just doing what
the disclaimer is tantamount to a confession.
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers
Not casting aspersions, and it may already be known to the list, but
Elizabeth
to town.
-Original Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 5:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A mistake was made...
If mailbox deletion fails, try FDISK on the server, see if that helps.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim
Not casting aspersions, and it may already be known to the list, but
Elizabeth should probably have disclaimered (sorry g) her message with a
comment about Clearswift's involvement with MIMEsweeper.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth Farrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
tryingreallyhardtobepolite
The archives. Read the archives. PLEASE read the archives.
G.
/polite,ish
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 06:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email Archiving
I am currently testing
It's just a thought, but did it occur to you to actually look at the fscking
MEC website? And perchance at where the hotels are in relation to the
conference center? Or even the part of the clearly totally irrelevant page
where it STATES that shuttles will be available from some of the hotels
Very elegantly put, nice one. I'm borrowing that one, to apply to someone
I know later...
G.
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 18:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook appointments on Exchange
The reasons why
Hire someone with more than half a clue to administer your messaging
environment.
Hell, you never know, they might even be able to search Technet.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 20:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A
Jon,
Space management and server growth is something that I'm very interested in,
as it has a very real effect on my day to day management strategies. I'm
vaguely familiar with Roger and the work he's done (something to do with
mergers and acquisitions for Peregrine, I believe) and I was
And you thought that sharing that would be good because?
Go and put your tongue back in the light socket, there's a good boy.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 20:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: This is a screwed up
If mailbox deletion fails, try FDISK on the server, see if that helps.
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 21:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A mistake was made...
If it is offensive and you don't want users reading
Clue one: If you want to change the subject, change the fscking subject
line. eh?
Clue two: http://relays.osirusoft.com
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 22:32
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Where is
Message-
From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 2:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: This is a screwed up
And you thought that sharing that would be good because?
Go and put your tongue back in the light socket, there's a good boy.
-Original
Mostly that you're an idiot, a troll, or both.
-Original Message-
From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 June 2002 02:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: kinda OT - RAID on the exchange server
All right what does argle mean?
--Felicity
Argle.
- Original
The POLITEST response I can think of is go and use Google.
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 21:33
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Iam looking for information on:
1. Messaging
That'd be worth reading. I'm _still_ nicking odd quotes from you when I
need to compare messaging to dial-tone availability :)
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 00:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Messaging
So what?
Care to be a LITTLE bit more specific in your request? Or should we resort
to the crystal fscking balls and voodoo dances to try and work out what the
hell you're prattling on about?
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29,
Uh huh... that in the end would be what we suggested yesterday, then! :)
-Original Message-
From: Niki Blowfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 09:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Securing Outlook
Robert,
Yes, thats exactly what I was looking for.
Oh, I dunno - useful ammunition if anyone wants to comment on whether or not
EDS should be used for an outsourcing gig. It's going into _my_ save
file.
G.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 17:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Help of the sort you clearly need is only available from licensed
practitioners.
ERROR: ID-10-T.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 18:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: Mr. Coffee's Office up for grabs on Monday
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
