a problem), but do not leave them
there, or your
event logs will become VERY large. By doing so you can gather more
information not normally seen.
I hope this helps.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Smith, Ronni
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent
I have posted before about my issue with several public folders not getting
replicated (or not flipping the bit to indicate they have replicated
perhaps?) properly from my old server to my new server as I try to complete
a much too elongated ECMSM server upgrade. I have only gotten responses from
Hmm, sounds like you have configured it correctly. You have removed the
mailboxes right? Not just restricted their send/receive or something? I'm
not sure what would happen in that case.
I only have the one server (and it is an Exchange 5.5 machine), so I don't
know if it is related to the
server.
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Does anyone know how to get rid of unwanted emails?
Hmm, sounds like you have configured it correctly. You have
removed
server.
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 2:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Does anyone know how to get rid of unwanted emails?
Hmm, sounds like you have configured it correctly. You have
I think you misread/misunderstood. You want to list all the e-mail addresses
that you want to go poof as alternate internet addresses _for_ the DL. The
dl has no addresses in it. So when it is expanded it expands to nothing.
Hence the black hole.
Ronni
*
In
I have a similar error message appearing about my Exchange 5.5 server but
mine says 1753 instead of 1722. And thus far I am unable to determine if I
am really having problems with the RPC endpoint mapper or why I am having
them. However, I found a number of hits for 1722 while trying to find the
I'm pretty sure I have shot myself in the foot and so first up let me
acknowledge my stupidity. I'm hoping that someone can suggest the best way
to recover...
I am moving our single Exchange server to a new machine using the ECMSM[1].
I am moving from Exchange 5.5 on NT4 to Exchange 5.5 on
I think he means the console that pushes the updates out to the client
machines.
If so, I found this on Trend's site which seems to be saying maybe but we
don't promise anything and here is how to fix one error you get when
installing
Well, over the weekend I did a bunch of work it may turn out I didn't need
to do. The user had told me he did not have the IM support turned on when
what he really meant was that he did not remember turning it on. But he did
not actually look even though I told him where to look while he was on
with 5.5 server - long
Apply SP4
Run Performance Optimizer.
Ensure that IM Messaging thingy is turned off in Tools/Options.
This only effects one user?
- Original Message -
From: Smith, Ronni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3
Trying to be thorough but then it gets long - sorry. I hope I have included
all the information needed. And not too much unnecessary info.
I have an on-the-lan user (Outlook XP on Windows 2000 all current hotfixes
and service packs as of yesterday morning anyway, Exchange 5.5 SP3+ some
hotfixes)
-
From: Smith, Ronni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:42 PM
Subject: Outlook slow to communicate with 5.5 server - long
Trying to be thorough but then it gets long - sorry. I hope I have
included
all the information needed
Discussions
Subject: Re: Outlook slow to communicate with 5.5 server - long
Apply SP4
Run Performance Optimizer.
Ensure that IM Messaging thingy is turned off in
Tools/Options. This only
effects one user?
- Original Message -
From: Smith, Ronni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
In the 11/99 Technet package there was a Service Packs CD which was an
Outlook 2000 install CD for Exchange 5.5 if that helps any.
Ronni
-Original Message-
From: Mike Strock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 7:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook
I have a series of tests that I run manually to test the relaying. I got it
from one of the testing websites a couple of years ago. I can't recall which
one. It ran about 10 or 12 different tests I think. One of which would not
produce the 550 relay prohibited thing when run against Exchange 5.5
approach,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 February 2003 22:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook over VPN - MTU issue? - problems with Q301337 fix?
We are a one Exchange 5.5 server shop. A few months ago I began the process
We are a one Exchange 5.5 server shop. A few months ago I began the process
of moving us to a new server. New hardware, new name, following Ed's Move
Server Method which I have already done once without issue on NT4 to NT4.
This time we moved to Windows 2000 for the new server's OS. New server is
When I move from one server to another I find that comparing the public
folder resources at the server level gave me that warm fuzzy feeling. Easily
done with save window contents and Excel. I can spot right away any folder
that hasn't fully replicated yet.
And I always leave the old machine up
Use public folders with permissions set so that only the approved users can
access the folders and only the service account can change access? Use a
separate server to host these public folders and use a different account for
the service account than any other account on your network giving the
Speaking from experience, if you build any room, server or not, with no
windows (the glass kind) make sure you have some sort of emergency lighting
in it for when the power goes out. Your UPSes' status lights will not
provide enough light for you to find your way out of the room unless it is
very
Those who were having Trend Scanmail successfully catch this by using
attachment screening could you please reply with which version engine etc.
you are using? My Scanmail did not catch it in spite of my having *.scr in
my attachment extensions to block list. It still didn't with *.*.scr either.
1) I think you can't really make anything bulletproof but Microsoft has a
security tool that sets perms for an IIS server running OWA to minimize
risk. Search for the IIS security tool or something like that.
2) Yes you can run OWA on a different server. I do that. I have a cheapo
ex-desktop
evil. We're basically a Microsoft
environment here so since I have to use IIS for the web
server I may as well
install OWA on it as well. Do I just install the OWA
component from SP4? Any
other Exchange components required?
Regards
Tony
-Original Message-
From: Smith, Ronni
That reminds me... I think you want to remove the b in bonus in the
third example below since I am pretty sure Tom meant onus even if he
didn't type it. Or even more likely, he did type it correctly and a
spell-checker along the way did what they are best at.
Ronni
-Original Message-
I'm in although the amount of $ I could contribute is quite limited. I only
have about 25 users and only about 5 of them get that much junk so the
company doesn't see it as much of a priority compared to other things. Like
getting the server room its own A/C. A point on which I have to say I
In the FAQ under PST=BAD reason 7 is Messages take up more space in a PST
than in an Exchange store. I seem to be finding that that is true but I am
finding some of them taking up something like 4 times as much space which
seems overboard to me. Others only seem to be increasing by about 30% not
I wouldn't doubt that needing 512MB min paging space might be true for
Windows 2000 but, for what it is worth, for those still running on NT4 - I
used to run Exchange 5.5 SP3 on a Pentium 180 with 192MB ram running NT4
SP6a with the paging file set to 384 max and min with about 25 very heavy
Start netscape messenger and in the inbox view edit menu preferences
mailnewsgroups and finally click messages and on the form that appears
under message wrapping put a checkbox in the box next to wrap incoming
messages to window width
Disclaimer not the exact text I don't have netscape on this
We use distribution lists for things kinda sorta like that. But they use it
for additional things as well which only work on a distribution list basis.
Plus, we are a very small company so the GAL is very small. We preface all
distribution lists with a particular set of characters so they are all
You build a special webserver just for the OWA. At least that is what I did
in the same situation. You don't let your web host anywhere near it
(possibly, unless they are significantly more knowledgable than you about
Windows and IIS and security). You don't put anything else on it and you
harden
Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA setup
Do you have any links with instructions for doing
this...since you have
already done it yourself?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Smith, Ronni
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 3:27 PM
Here's a guess: The boss wants to check the senders to make sure he isn't
tossing mail from anyone he knows before he empties his deleted items folder
(if he ever does - he may not realize he can/should etc) and no one has
shown him how to set the view to by sender in deleted items.
Ronni
Hello all,
We are looking at getting Trend's E-Manager content filter as an add on to
our Scanmail a/v product to start screening out spam. If you have or are
using E-Manager for Scanmail could you let me know if you would recommend
for or against it and if there are any caveats I need to be
Hence my last question as to the amount of time spent pulling the good mail
out of the filtered mail. I am already aware of many of the pitfalls of
content filtering. Anything I didn't already know I learned through an
experiment with the Outlook rules which resulted in noticible amounts of my
Well, that was my first thought the first time it happened since it was a
moved T1 in a new location for us but it seemed to me that that didn't stand
up under examination. Since there were NDRs going out from the postmaster,
one of which showed up in the logs once I had turned them up showing
I've twice now seen a mysterious hiatus in outgoing SMTP mail and I am
wondering if anyone has seen it before and especially if anyone knows why it
happened/happens and how to make it not happen again. I have re-read the faq
and see nothing that addresses this. I have searched technet and the
Back in the old days at my old job we still didn't have e-mail[1] so we
couldn't forge messages. But if you left your terminal unlocked you ran the
risk of one or more nasty things happening to you (and this was just the
other users mind you).
Your files were all moved to some other directory so
I have read (somewhere - can't remember where) that there is a scam spam
going around. If anyone wishes to donate to firefighter relief funds here is
a site http://www.firehouse.com/ with links to an official fund (url
passed on by the wife of a firefighter not in NY so I am assuming that is
the
39 matches
Mail list logo
