Enable autoreplies ot the internet or use a server side script instead of a
rule. The latter being more preferable in my mind.
-Original Message-
From: Melissa Burgess [mailto:mburgess;hrtransit.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 9:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Need
== Maine School and Library Network
==University of Maine System
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 6:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
User error.
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:alex.gonzalez;handleman.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Calendar events
I have a user who is using Outlook XP SP2 who went to make a
change to add users to a meeting
Note the URL is an internal URL only... So to read the doc I had to first
hack into their network.
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:AWILKES;bordersgroupinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: not just confidential..
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:Ken.Hatley;bankofamerica.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: DL information
Is there a way to export the owner? I have to associate an
owner with all of the DLs.
Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Ok please explain.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
97.25% of mail admins
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of
Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
97.25% of mail admins are too stupid to understand what an
RBL actually is/does. I
PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
Are you going to trust (l)[EMAIL PROTECTED] to tell you who is
and isn't a spammer? How about that psycho guy you saw
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: RBL's
www.google.com?
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net]
Sent: Wednesday
That puts you in the distinct minority of posters then. Join the elite few
by showing your work and you too can have a gold star next to your name.
Seriously, if you've tried something and it didn't work then you should
include that information so those trying to help you don't cover old ground.
Post the exact ndr pls.
-Original Message-
From: Sean Brandt [mailto:sean.brandt;lonelyplanet.com]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 5:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: 550 Relaying Denied
I have an exchange server that has domain_a as it's
default address. I have a
Er... Eseutil /r? Probably not a point I'd be at before being on the phone
with PSS or having done a boatload more torubleshooting than is evidenced
here. Restore from your last good backup and replay the transaction logs.
-Original Message-
From: Niko
Add them all to the To line and remove the ones they don't need. Or hack the
outlib(?) dll to add the functionality back.
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:RPILLAI;dancona.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Contacts view:
Hmm.. I've never had that problem. How does one get that problem?
Looks like a lot of Exchange admins are having similar
problems with users deleting folders.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Exchange knows not of any domain concept which would apply to the moving of
mailboxes.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
Give a man a fish, he owes you one fish.
Teach a man to fish, you give up your monopoly on fisheries.
-Original Message
Given enough $ there's a tool to do everything.
-Original Message-
From: Uso [mailto:usofwd;gmx.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K: automatic address list creation
Hi,
is there a way to create a hierarchal address list view
Change the display name format to last name, first name.
-Original Message-
From: Todd Boynton [mailto:tboynton;maine.edu]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Address Book Listings
When a user is creating new mail and clicks on To... to
You could use a custom preview pane extension instead of the built in one.
As mentioned in the article, the use of vbscript is a non-factor in the
Outlook 2002 version of the preview pane. Or you could simply implement the
workaround mentioned in the article.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales
Short answer? Yes.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
EMS: Disaster Continuity for Mission Critical Messaging
-Original Message-
From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood;ipplc.com]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:48 AM
To: Exchange
query.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
Shh.. I'm watchin the Chippendales. -- Jennifer Baker (1/2/2002)
They're so cute in that episode when they try to steal all of the acorns,
then end up knocking over the christmas tree on top of Donald Duck
www.mail-resources.com | web links | server | archival
-Original Message-
From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:mhutchins;amr-corp.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:08 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Message tracking
Can anyone recommend a solution? My company wants to keep
Microsoft word can open a variety of file types.
-Original Message-
From: Bravo, Liliana [mailto:L.BRAVO;CGIAR.ORG]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 7:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sace document in Outlook Express with Microsoft Word
Importance: High
Hi Friends,
Paitence grasshopper. How long are you waiting to allow it to run?
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 9:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Recipient Updae Policy
I just finished setting up a new Exchange
I build my address lists based on common attributes across all objects...
The problem you are running into I believe (I looked at the problem briefly
when you first posted) is that the LDAP query you wind up creating is a
series of 'ands'and you need an 'or' for the DL objects to be included.
www.mail-resources.com | web links | server | archival I believe.
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000 internet eMail archiving
Hi
My customer havee
Outlook.
-Original Message-
From: Khoi Nguyen
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 10/15/2002 9:25 AM
Subject: viewer of PST
Sensitivity: Private
Hi exchangers,
Does anyone know of a utility that will allow a user to view their pst
off line without importing it into your current mailbox to
Not exactly.
-Original Message-
From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K question
Hi There
Interesting that you should ask this question - I had the
same question come up recently.
You might want to invest in the new Hotmail grammar checker first. ;*
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Eventid.net $$$
I just noticed that www.eventid.net now has a fee
question
Hi there
OOppsss... Where did I error?
Thanks
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 12:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K question
Not exactly.
-Original Message
Am I missing something? What does eventid.net provide that TechNet and Deja
don't 10x over? I used it once or twice just out of curiosity (but didn't
inhale), and found it to be less than useful.
-Original Message-
From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October
That is wrong in what sense? I agree that Dale is wrong, but does Mailkeeper
have to do with whether or not a PST file can be opened from a CD? As long
as you're correcting facts, by all means do correct them; don't leave us
hanging.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht
To: Exchange
I love theories.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 9:32 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
No, according to the theory you can get more users on
Active/Active
MEC Typical Exchange environment.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Views on Exchange Active Active clustering
Perhaps it would be better if you educated that customer
Plenty of ways to do it, but via Outlook straight from the box is not one of
them.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Natkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 12:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Permissions to modify mailbox information
So the
Why would you think A, 'disabling circular logging' would be the correct
answer?
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E2K question
Answer pelase. I think it's A.
Your
Hmm... Works for me.
-Original Message-
From: Stephens, Tara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Phonelist
I found the code on CDOLive for making a phonelist from the
GAL, but it doesn't work with E2K. Is
Not true at all.
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server migration
Thanks guys. But I learned we have to have AD installed
before we can go to E2K. True?
Regards,
Bulk add from Excel... www.cdolive.com or spend a few minutes modifying the
create user enabled mailbox object at www.swinc.com. I have a version I use,
but it's never been tested outside my lab and would likely cause the planet
to implode if released.
-Original Message-
From:
]] On Behalf Of
Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server migration
Not true at all.
-Original Message-
From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:55 PM
Subject: RE: E2K question
Why would you think A, 'disabling circular logging' would be the
correct answer?
-Original Message-
From
Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Server migration
It's not true. He
with an ASP solution.
That doesn't take away your 'meanness'. Which is one of your
best traits.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Chris Scharff
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
The turbo geek version has a couple of more features, but depends on the
needs. (As does most everything)
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: someone was looking for a
Delegates.
-Original Message-
From: Julian Brunt
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 10/4/2002 7:46 AM
Subject: Multiple People recieving Meeting Requests
All
I am confused:
I send a meeting request to 1 user and 3 receive the
invitation.
I have just tested sending to the same user from
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Policy issue
It's unlikely that you or the system itself has the ability
to delete mail in accordance with a well written retention
in E2K if I was
allowed to. And yes I know it's my job, but I sure the heck
don't want to spend a week or more manually going through our
IS with a lawyer looking over my shoulder.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October
Someone tried to send e-mail using authenticated relay and the
authentication failed. Are you seeing a slew of these?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC Error - Again
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again
I've seen two, there may have been three, of these. Not ongoing.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:31 AM
Downloaded via POP3? Held in a local PST file? Is it retrievable via deleted
items retention?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 12:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Missing INBOXES
We are using Exchange
Netscape being the server product rather than the client.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC Error - Again
That IP address belongs in Korea. Do you have anyone
POP environment as in users only connect via POP3? Is the customer currently
running 5.5? Do they have AD in place?
-Original Message-
From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Installing
be that
Exchange in general isn't appropriate for their needs.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
-Original Message-
From: Vans Evers, Frank W. SAIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Check the FAQ.
-Original Message-
From: Gunanathan, Amir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange with 2 email address
Hi,
We have a single Exchange 5.5 (ent) with SP3 on NT 4.0 with
SP6a. I would like
Sounds like a job for a network load balancer.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 6:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Advanced SMTP outbound management
Hi,
Does anyone know of an add for Exchange 2000 that
Test it and see?
-Original Message-
From: Eric Goforth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Free/Busy Question
And the answer would be?
Eric J. Goforth
-Original Message-
From: Clishe, Jason
Microsoft Exchange 2000 Infrastructure Design
ISBN: 182451
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ADC Connector
I believe this may have been covered close to a zillion
Send him to groups.yahoo.com?
-Original Message-
From: Eric Goforth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Large Mailing List
OK, this is going to sound really stupid. Don't shoot the IT
Puppet. I have a
Not what, but who. I am the most reliable content filter for Exchange. For
only $375k (plus 125k annual maint) I'll come filter your mail.
-Original Message-
From: Cooke, Brian
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 10/1/2002 8:52 AM
Subject: Content Filtering
Hi all,
I just had a quick
There's a Q article which describes how to do this for E2K[1], for Exchange
5.5, a 3rd party product would be required.
[1] The Q article itself describes 1 particular scenario. Other more complex
scenarios would require adaptation of the code.
-Original Message-
From: wade robinson
Well, you've also munged the headers sufficiently so as to make
troubleshooting neigh unto impossible. However if x.x.x.x corresponds to
bigbird1.cubist.com or bigbird3.terragenco.uk, your issue would appear to be
unrelated to Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Steve I [mailto:[EMAIL
SIS is maintained per database, not per server. So in moving users between
databases SIS is maintained on a per database basis. When, how and where you
should opt for additional servers, databases or storage groups is not a
universal formula which can be applied unilaterally. Based on the
IS
above 70G? The IS is on EMC. The server is very very strong
and acts very fast
Thanks for your time!
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:32 PM
Subject: RE: IS 70GB
Fine, great you're on a beta. Discuss it somewhere else. Perhaps in the
private newsgroups specifically designed for the subject? Jeez.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 10:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
The mailbox doesn't appear where?
-Original Message-
From: Helen Best [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox not created
Hi all
I am running W2000, SP3 with Ex2000, SP2.
After a few teething
It's best to break any encountered problem down to its fundamental
components and have TechNet handy.
-Original Message-
From: Derek Soppitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 7:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: synchronizing
I would appreciate
Windows 2000 domains have nothing to do with DNS domains. My forest name
doesn't match any DNS domain I receive SMTP mail for. Configure your
recipient policies (and DNS) as needed to receive mail for a particular
domain.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Multiple mailboxes 1 domain
Right Chris. I misread the question.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:26 PM
Subject: RE: Multiple
http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_BUGBEAR
.A
-Original Message-
From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly
I haven't seen it yet
What's their base search? What errors do they receive?
-Original Message-
From: Gagrani, Kishore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: LDAP Issues
Hi,
We moved from Win-NT 4 / Exchange 5.5 SP4 to Win2K (mixed
Depends on the migration process being used.
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 8:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Conversion
Is there a process in the migration is there a tool or
anything that clears up
The SMTP address the users receive is based on the recipient policy that
applies to that user. Recipient policies can be modified in the ESM.
-Original Message-
From: Berepoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
The one that isn't RFC Compliant for this particular issue.
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MIME and Exchange
Most other mail servers can send mail to Exchange
Friggin Lyris.
I rarely tell anyone to shut their pie hole (Unless it's Andy
David). Instead you shoudl ask him to document his argument
in detail so you can consider it. At the moment, his
assertion is too vague to consider as valid or not.
-Original Message-
From: Edwards,
The received stamp is handled by the Exchange server, the sent by the
client... So it sounds like
-Original Message-
From: MS Exchange Mailing List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: GMT time zone stamp
have to ask
What is Friggin Lyris?
Thanks
Russell
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Message rejected
Friggin Lyris.
I rarely tell anyone to shut
User error?
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: The dreaded POP3
exch5.5 sp4 with post hf's
client OE4
Company bought software, uses only pop3. No way to change
Yes, you can buy MSDN support incidents in a similar way to PSS incidents.
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: support for developers
I know there is PSS for help from MS,
Exchange 5.5 SP4.
Sorry to post this again. Maybe someone new has some information.
Well the system that processes the @UC.EDU aliases for the
University finally took a big hit. Its a VMS system running
PMDF and is run in a different department. We've been asked
to look at
After killing people who ask the same question for the n hundredth time this
year, I'm usually too tired to prevent spam. :^*
-Original Message-
From: Williams Scott CTR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: POLL
Can you manually retrieve mail via POP3? If so, then yopu're asking the
wrong group what's up with your 3rd party software. If you can't manually
retrieve your mail via POP3, you'll have an error message which will help us
to help you.
Off to the pub now to drink my lunch.
-Original
no idea what you are talking about since you've completely oversnipped
please pardon me while I head back to the pub for a nother pint or twelve.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Oh, you were using the wrong username format? That one's covered in the FAQ
as well. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT)
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/25/2002 2:21 PM
Subject: RE: The dreaded POP3
Ok. Found the answer.
In outlook express, tools - accounts - account name -
That's no rumor Ed.
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Hotmail problems?
Rumor has it they're reserving their connections for Spammers.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Out of curiosity, what is the fascination with whether hotmail works or not?
Do people actually use hotmail accounts for receiving mail they'd want to
read? The mind boggles.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 11:32 AM
To:
The email address is SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 12:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: malformed address
We received the following NDR, noting an error 553,
malformed
How are they having trouble? Your problem description seems to indicate that
they get in just fine. Color me confused.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Householder
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 9/23/2002 7:31 AM
Subject: OWA Exchange 2000
Hello Everyone.
I'm using Exchange 2000 SP3
this before. The
client is running Windows 98 SE with IE 6.0
Thanks
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 9:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA Exchange 2000
How
Not aware of any limit or recommendation for one.
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Maximum number of email addresses in a single container??
On an Exchange 5.5 server,
www.mail-resources.com web links | server | archival
-Original Message-
From: Peter Orlowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 5:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Email Archival tools
I have a user asking me if there is a group archival tool
www.antivirus.com Read up on Klez, then worry if you'd like. It's certainly
not an Exchange security breach.
-Original Message-
From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Security
Read RFC2821 and RFC2822.
-Original Message-
From: Rama Arumugam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 10:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange Security Breach
What do you mean by someone else's machine or someone used my
boss's
www.mail-resources.com | web links | server | directory management
-Original Message-
From: Bare, Ronald A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 2:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Tools for Maintaining Active Directory
We need to add a large
At $vbc I organized them through dictatorial decree.
--
Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE
EMS Sales Engineer
MessageOne
512.652.4500 x-244
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
who
authenticate. Then a custom recipient setup and the delivery
options for that user pointing to it. Seemed like a no brainer to me.
e-
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 4:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
IIRC OS doesn't matter, but Exchange version and SP/hotfix do.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Vantine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mailbox Recovery
In the past I have I have used server to restore a
Does the cause related in Q323671 apply anyway?
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
Hi,
No -- Just one 2000 server to another. Both
What version of Outlook is installed on the box doing the import?
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
No, I just checked and the PSTs are
Well, it certainly won't work without it. ;0 Outlook and exmerge could also
be installed on a non-exchange server.
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge fails
The item is being converted to plain text en route, the solution would be
for it not to be converted... The problem might exist on your side if you've
specified that mail to this domain be sent in plain text only. Or the user
may have an option set to send to this recipient in plain text. You
Is the list up Mr. List monitor?
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
Post a question, don't send just a test..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
901 - 1000 of 2387 matches
Mail list logo
