SBS 4.5 to SBS 2003
Hi, Does anyone know if the in place upgrade of SBS 4.5 to SBS 2003 uses Exmerge(don't really want this as the SIS will be lost and the database would go over 16GB) or does it action a proper database to database upgrade? the documentation just seems to dodge exactly how it's going to deal with the exchange part. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (06) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K services stopping
What version of Groupshield and are you using ESE scanning? -Original Message- From: Alastair Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 November 2003 17:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K services stopping Last week I posting to this list about SMTP between our current E2K server and newly installed (into the same organisation and routing group) E2K3 cluster. That problem is that when sending from an E2K mailbox via MAPI or OWA the message appears to be queued for the E2K3 cluster and leave that queue, but no evidence of it is ever seen on the E2K3 cluster and eventually it reappears back in the E2K server's queue. What does work, however, is telneting on port 25 from the E2K server to the E2K3 cluster and conducting the SMTP dialogue at that level. Microsoft is now investigating this problem. However this posting relates to the following. Yesterday, as part of our attempts to resolve the SMTP issue we installed and ran Winroute and Netmon on the E2K server. (This server has run without problems for well over a year and a half. It is uptodate with windows and exchange service packs and patches. Groupshield antivirus dat files are updated daily.) Subsequently the Information store on the server has started to stop for no apparent reason (the system log says - The Microsoft exchange information store service terminated unexpectedly - id 7031 ( which was of little help). After the first occurrence we removed Netmon and after a further occurrence rebooted the server. The problem persisted. We also had an additional (worse?) problem. Whereas with the above problem the information store could be manually restarted, with the latest problem various services stopped functioning, (smtp, www, IISadmin etc) although the Services display indicated they were still running. Attempting to stop or start them failed and resulted in the message - Error 1053: The service did not respond to the start or control request in a timely fashion. Rebooting was the only way to get the services running again. Any advice only how to restore the stability of the E2K server would be appreciated. Thanks. Alastair Morrison IT Services Strathclyde University UK - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Strathclyde University Glasgow UK _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: C2C archiving software
David, Looked at this product but didn't like the idea of swapping my Priv database over to a Pub database, just moves the problem around in Exchange. Legacy Email I believe should be removed to improve Exchange times, but keep user transparent access. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Haber, David J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 October 2003 13:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: C2C archiving software Anybody using C2C Archive One for email archiving? I'd like to get some opinions about this product. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (gfd) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: A CHALLENGE to the List
Ditto from the United Kingdom Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 September 2003 23:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: A CHALLENGE to the List I see the 10 to 12 looks like its gone, but I would be happy to accept your challenge should you want a non-USA review of your book. regards Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20/09/2003 8:23:27 a.m. Well, it appears that a number of individuals from this list have chosen to engage in childish and cowardly ad hominem attacks on myself and Achieving Process Profitability: Building the IT Profit Center without ever even reading a single page of it. I have been in contact with Amazon.com so these reviews will be removed in the near future. I could take this opportunity to opine about how unprofessional, unfair, childish and cowardly this is, but instead I offer this challenge: I will send you a copy of my Achieving Process Profitability at my own expense for you to review. All that I ask in return is that you actually read Achieving Process Profitability and post an honest, impartial review of it's contents, not your personal prejudices, to Amazon.com and this list. I will only respond to indivuals that publicly accept my challenge on this list, just respond to this message and then privately email me your name and address. I have a limited supply of books so I will accept the first 10-12 responses to this challenge. All fair-minded individuals will accept this challenge and the rest of the pompous bags of gas will be exposed for what they are. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and SAN
Dan, Hey, you run a tight ship then (65GB / 16,000+ mailboxes) ;-) Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Daniel Foerst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 September 2003 05:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange and SAN I run 2 Exchange 2000 Enterprise servers on an HP EVA2 SAN. Each server has a 65GB IS right now and a 2GB Public IS. 16,000+ mailboxes total. I have seen no issues since migrating from our 5.5 environment 1 month ago to 2000 and moving away from direct attached SCSI disk environment. The big difference I have notice is that backups are faster because our Tape Unit is attached to the SAN as well and can be shared by both servers. -dan foerst _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security
Yeah, I remember them in my mainframe days, we used them for our remote access. Like'em, I thought they sold out. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 September 2003 22:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security I couldn't tell you. Our dialup consists of dialing to what essentially is a world-wide ISP, then firing up a Nortel VPN client. The Nortel client is apparently pretty tightly integrated with SecurID - I'm assuming it uses the native SecurID API for authentication. I remember in the old days, when we used Shivas[1] for remote access we had the same problem. The Shivas were limited to using Tacacs to talk to SecurID. Tacacs didn't have provisions for querying the user for more information (next token, new PIN, etc), so these features didn't work. Then Shiva added Tacacs+, which DID allow for querying the user, and life was good. You will need to look at what protocol your authentication mechanism is using to talk to SecurID and see if you can come up with something that supports querying the user. [1] Anyone remember Shiva? I'm constantly amazed at how a company could literally own the remote access market, then manage to lose everything in such a short period of time. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security Ken / Roger, I know it's OT, but I have a quick question for you two. We don't have a VPN option here, but we have ~50 users using the tokens for dial-in. Occasionally, their tokens will get out of sync and of course, lock them out after three successive tries. As Ken indicated, if the user is two codes ahead or behind, it will put your token in Next-Token mode and is supposed to prompt you onscreen. However, our users never see the Next-Token notification on their end. Why? Is it because they are using Win9x/ME on their end or is it because of something on the server end? Server is NT 4 SP6a in an NT4 domain. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security It really is a cool system. We're currently using it for VPN access and front ending OWA, and we're playing with it and some Cisco Aironet wireless devices - requiring SecurID authentication before you get onto the wireless network. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security I've not examined the system for several years (I'm just a happy user now, not and admin), but at least at one time SecurID would accept the current code (of course),one code behind or one ahead for a total window of 3 minutes as Roger notes. If the gadget's clock had drifted to more than one minute off, and you were TWO codes ahead or behind, the system would additionally prompt for the NEXT code displayed to make sure you were you, and it would update the stored time offset for your gadget. Pretty slick system. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security Actually, you've got the system down correctly. However, the slack time is +/- 1 minute, so you really get 3 minutes per code. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security Forgive me for arguing, but I believe the time alloted for guessing that third factor is even less than indicated below. Of course, by token, I am referring to what RSA calls a keyfob. Is that what you are referring to as well? Here is what I understand to be the process, from reading the manuals we have: 1. Upon issuance to the user, you synch the token/keyfob with the the RSA server DB. 2. A 6-digit code displays for 1 minute on the token. 3. If used for authentication within that 1 minute period, it is time-stamped as to when you entered the Passcode (PIN + code) and has an additional 1 minute latency period. Meaning that if you dial-up and enter your passcode, 30-seconds into the code, you
RE: Problem with OOO messages
Alex, His OOO rule is corrupt, use the admin clean mailbox and enter OOFRULES in the custom clean, (there is a Q article Q223391 which refers to the reverse IE sends every time look for that). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Alex Alborzfard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 August 2003 16:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem with OOO messages EX 5.5, SP4 - NT4 SP6 Out of office message works for one user but not for at another user. Both users are on the same server, but in different recipient containsers. Any ideas why? Thanks --Alex Alborzfard Exchange Admin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (gfd) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
We use 3. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 5:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3 Layers of Virus protection. I was curious how many have 3 layers of protection for their email systems. My current assignment has me at a place where they are comfortable with desktop and a set of SMTP servers doing virus and spam. Desktop is Symantec and Trend on the SMTP servers. My gut feeling is to also protect the IS stores too. How many have 3 levels. _ bGet MSN 8/b and help protect your children with advanced parental controls. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (gfd) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
We use Netbackup, thankfully it's not my responsibility, so the backup team do BLB's for their sins to our masters. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 August 2003 20:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup Software for Exchange 2000 Hello All. What kind of backup software do you use for Exchange 2000? Need to do brick levels too. I know...management wants the brick levelstried talking them out of it. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sychronization logs
Tony, I sad to say that we still use Outlook 2000 as our client and when using it with 5.5 it generates a log if it's successful or not. Don't know when it is connected to Ex 2000. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 August 2003 05:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sychronization logs My recollection is that it puts a log there only if there is a problem. Can't say for sure, though, because I'm running Outlook 2003 now. It puts log messages for problems only in the Sync Issues folder. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Helping others with Exchange for over a twentieth of a century. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 5:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sychronization logs Although this is more of an Outlook question I will through this out. Environment is E2K SP3 with user workstations using W2K Professional with SP3 and Office 2000 SP1. Many user use Outlook 2000 in offline mode. This is fine as all do not have hi-speed access. The problem is the synch. logs do not always show up in the deleted items. I thought they write to a log and place it in the deleted items everytime it runs even though there may be no changes made? Question is what is the rules for a log file to be placed in the deleted items. The only way I can get one there is to create a new OST. _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (gfd) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Permission Issue?
Missy, I would agree with you as the Exchange server would not update the NT account permission on the IS until the 2 hour replication cycle has initiate (unless of course you have change the reg entry down to 5min or something). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 July 2003 18:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Permission Issue? My understanding (which may well be flawed, but hey, this is my very own understanding, ya know?) is that Exchange doesn't really care about this. But if you're seeing evidence to the contrary, I could well be wrong. - Original Message - From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 1:01 PM Subject: RE: Permission Issue? Missy, In an NT 4.0 domain environment? I have the same environment as Scott has. Ex5.5 SP4 on a Win2000 SP2 machine, running in an NT 4.0 domain. The only difference is that they are using VPN...we are not at this time. However, we use one of our Help Desk temps occasionally to break up the boredom. We flip his network account between enabled and disabled every 20 minutes or so, for an hour or two, and depending on where the DC's are in their 15-minute refresh cycle, it can take as little as a minute for him to be locked out of everything. When he is locked out, the system asks him to put in his name and password every time he tries to send an e-mail and then subsequently denies his request. It also locks him out of any network connectivity. It does let him continue to use his workstation though. Scott...the only thing I can think of, is that you have changed the default refresh value for the DC's from 15 minutes to over an hour. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Permission Issue? My understanding is that an open session remains open and that disabling the account will not impact that session. -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Permission Issue? Somehow this user was able to send out an e-mail an hour after his account was disabled. I checked my VPN log and he logged on before he was fired but didn't log off until 3 hours after he was canned (and his account disabled). I was st00pid in assuming that the manager at that location would physically remove him from his PC. If you're saying no, that this is not possible, how else could he have done it? Nope. But if you really want to be doubly sure, go modify his account and put yourself as the only account on the mailbox with permissions and set the Send/Receive limit to zero. -Original Message- From: Scott Force [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 6:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Permission Issue? Windows NT4.0/6a domain running Exchange 5.5/4 single site. User is primary windows NT account for his mailbox. User gets fired, I disable his NT account. If the user was connected through a VPN at 10:00AM and had his Outlook XP client open, then at 11:00AM I disabled his account and he never closed the application or disconnected from his VPN connection, would he still be able to send e-mail? TIA, Scott _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of
RE: Perrmission denied??
Tony, I assume when the PF is hidden and the user tries to send as he does not get the 'from' address to underline? normally you cannot send to an hidden GAL entry for example unless you specify something like the SMTP address and you cannot send as it will not resolve to the name and confirm that you have send rights. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2003 17:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Perrmission denied?? Forgot. E2K SP3 One single PF store , From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Perrmission denied?? Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:41:39 -0400 I have a user that is a owner of a public folder and he has send as and send on behalf permissions. The send as was added later but was decided to keep the send on behalf, as it wouldn't hurt anything. The PF mail address is hidden from the GAL. Receives mail fine. But when the user goes to send as he gets you do not have permissions. However if I unhide the PF mail address from the GAL he can send as just fine no errors. Is this a bug. Do I need to remove the send on behalf for it to function in the hidden mode. _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP
Bill, This will only stop the basic user (minesweeper for example will open multiple level zip file to scan or/and block certain attachments) because if you password protect the zipno can do and in it comes (assuming zips are allowed in). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 June 2003 16:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rec on Blocking Files types contain in ZIP I need something that can block specified file types contained in ZIP files.. i.e. if a say EXE...etc.. has been ZIP into a file attachment on an e-mail I need to block it.. Alas...my Trend suite does NOT! (disappointingvery!) rec's from anyone??? please FYI: presently exch55sp4. But I prefer a gateway type thingy..but on the box would do also. yes I requested Trend to add the feature..but no guarantees they will...sigh...bummer... thanks! bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virtual Memory error
Brian, Recently someone had the same issues as you and the following was posted here - Here is something from Marc Stanton (Microsoft) Here is a useful checklist for VM problems that should be able to help solve your problems 1. Check whether this is Win2K Server or Advanced Server. If it's Server, then make sure that the /3GB switch is not in the boot.ini. If this is Advanced Server and there is more than 1Gb of physical RAM installed, ensure that /3GB does appear in the boot.ini 2. Look at the app log.are you seeing 9582 warnings (i.e. 32Mb block available) or 9582 errors (i.e. 16Mb block available). 3. Are the 9582's being accompanied by other out of memory errors such as 12800 events. If so, then you probably have users calling up the support desk asking why their mail isn't working. If user experience is good, then the 9582 may be relatively benign, but should still be investigated for possible action. 4. Look at the MSExchangeIS | VM Largest Block Size perfmon counter .I find this is the best counter to try figure out if something is wrong. You can look at this in realtime to get some data, but if you want to spot trends and figure out if memory is being released, then log this counter for 1 min intervals and collect about 18-24 hours worth. Look at the 'Minimum' value to see what the dip is. Don't worry if this value appears to be low, our own E2K servers at Microsoft were running at 55Mb as the largest block size. 5. Be aware that other store-related processes like virus scanning can tip the threshold. For example, at one customer, by enabling MDB scanning, the VM block would dip below 32Mb and thus the 9582's were generated. However, we only dipped slightly under 32Mb and user perf was absolutely fine. Additionally, during the night, the VM block would grow and the 9582's would stop. This is a classic example of a benign 9582 .as long as user perf is good and the VM block grows again during quiet times. 6. Unfortunately, some scenarios will dictate that you need to do something to get rid of the 9582's .pulling the MDB scanner off (if running) will probably do the trick, but this is a band-aid, not the solution. First of all, you really need to make sure that the server is running Exchange SP3. At various customers, we saw massive VM improvements once SP3 was applied. If you're running on a cluster, also make sure that Q315771 is installed. You'll also want to get the latest scsiport.sys driver install. The version which comes with Win2K SP2 is known to fragment VM (see Q311901 for more details) 7. If you're still seeing 9582's then you need to perform a reg tweak. This tweak is okay as long as there is a decent amount of RAM available in the server. Look at Memory | Available Bytes .if you have more than a couple hundred megs, then you're fine. This is the parameter that ITG runs with: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\HeapDeCommitFreeBlockThreshold=262144 8. At this stage, things should be on the up. For example, by doing all the above, a customer was able to re-enable MDB scanning and still only dip to 348Mb as the VM Largest Block. If you're still seeing issues, then you're either dealing with a heavily loaded system, or a leaky application. If you suspect a leaky app, take a look at Process | Private Bytes | Store to see if this is growing over a period of time. If you suspect the system is overloaded, then there should be other giveaways (such as high CPU utilization). 9. If the 9582's have still not disappeared, then take a look at your Physical Disk | Disk Queue Lengths for database and log drives (you'll need diskperf -y to get these stats). The disk queue length should never be consistently above the number of spindles in the array. You will of course see peaks, and these can range into the low hundreds, but this is fine. If disk queue lengths are up into 300+ and beyond pretty consistently then you have a disk bottleneck somewhere. If you determine that the disk is good, then you can lower the ESE buffer from 850 to 800Mb and get some more VM to play with This is the msExchESEParamCacheSizeMax value that is outlined in the Quick Tuning Guide. Note: Many customers with large systems actually up this value from 0.85Gb to 1.2Gb to get additional perf, however if you're VM bound, then it's much better to lower the value. 10. If after all this, things are still looking bad, you need to find other ways of reducing VM consumption. For example, what is the SG / MDB configuration? A customer having massive VM problems had 4 Storage Groups hosting a total of 8 databases. We got that down to 3 storage groups and they went away .sometimes the fourth will tip the server over the edge. This is certainly true for Exchange 2000 SP2 and under. SP3 this is not as big of deal 11. If all else fails, you will need to get a VADUMP (E2K reskit) on the store and contact PSS
RE: Message Headers
Check on the users Email account and see who has NT access and 'send as' permission set and it will be one of those. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 June 2003 15:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message Headers I have a few users that are using Outlook 2002. What they are doing is adding the From field in Outlook and sending mail as someone else instead of them. They click on new message and then they go to the view on the toolbar and then they select the From Field. I s there a way that i can tell what user is sending the message? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 11 Reply to All
Outlook will reply to you if you have your external address it has been sent to and it doesn't 'know' your the same person until exchange receive the request by which time it's to late and it sends it to you. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 13:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook 11 Reply to All although after some more observation it only seems to happen when I do a REPLY TO ALL from an external email address . . . - Original Message - From: Diane Poremsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:32 PM Subject: RE: Outlook 11 Reply to All Do you have more than one account in your profile? If so, it's because outlook has a problem knowing who you are - it's a problem in older versions too. -Original Message- I have notice lately that when I do a reply to all I am now included in the reply to all . . . . Anyone noticed this? I know it is beta, but thought perhaps someone else had seen this? Reviewing GFI Mail Essentials v8 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The spam that gets through
Neil, Where did you work with Liam? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 July 2003 16:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The spam that gets through I've just shaken my head and sighed at today's OOF messages I've got. :-) Including Liam Murphy at HP who I used to work with. Hi Liam! Neil -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: 08 July 2003 16:47 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: The spam that gets through Subject: RE: The spam that gets through I usually shake my head then kind of sigh. -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The spam that gets through Quick question following a vigourous debate here: How do people out in list-land handle spam which gets past the spam filters? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: additional display name?
Well we are able to access the GAL with the folder assistant (we do this for married people etc) -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2003 18:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: additional display name? But can the PF Folder assistant still access the GAL? Strikes me that it shouldn't be able to, much like Inbox Assistant/Rules Wizard rules can't. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 12:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: additional display name? True, you cannot forward out of the company unless you set up a CR, but internal email is OK to forward with the folder assistant. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2003 12:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: additional display name? PF's can't forward mail out, they can only receive mail, at least not without some coding. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: additional display name? IMHO Or you could instead create a PF that directs all email to the recipients renamed Emailbox and have the PF display the old maiden name in brackets (if you wish) Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2003 18:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: additional display name? We do that too.. Forgot to include it. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: additional display name? Additionally, we create a new SMTP addy for their married name, set it as the reply to address and leave the old one. That way, people can still reply to her old e-mails and at some point, they will start to see the new display name. I.E. Paula J Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) now becomes Paula J Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED] AND [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Works for us...YMMV. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: additional display name? We traditionally change the user to the married name (at their request, of course) then add in parenthesis their maiden name: Paula Jones (Smith) Tends to work well. The only way to do what you want would be to create a second mailbox and set the main mailbox as an alternate recipient. That's pretty kludgy to me. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: additional display name? Does anyone know of a way to have both a maiden name and married name appear as distinct display names in the OAB, yet have them both point to the same account? E2ksp3 Thanks, Gordon ___NOTICE_ This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract
RE: Archiving software
David, We use KVS and I piloted IXOS (over year ago now though), happy to supply any info required. Cheers Paul -Original Message- From: Haber, David J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 June 2003 14:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Archiving software I'm evaluating archiving software from EAS, KVS and IXOS. If anyone has any hands-on experience with any of these products please contact me offline. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Archiving Solutions
Carmila, ON the KVS front it just adds 'stubs' in place of the emails and it is the client that does the redirection retrieval. So no change at the Exchange end. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2003 19:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Archiving Solutions Thanks for the replies. Does anyone actually have first hand experience using these things? My major concern is in the area of disaster recovery. How easy/hard is it to restore exchange with these 3rd party solutions? I'm concerned about introducing an SQL server into the picture. Exchange is complicated enough and I'm squirmish about maintaining a SQL server at the same time. Thanks, Carmila -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 6:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions KVS and AttachStor are technologies worth looking at. www.mail-resources.com has a number of other 3rd party tools listed in the web links | server | archival section I believe. -Original Message- From: Carmila Fresco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:02 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Archiving Solutions Subject: Archiving Solutions Does anyone have any experience with archiving solutions like veritas storage migrator for exchange? We currently do not impose hard limits on our users due to a lot of regulations that we need to comply with. We have users who have mailboxes close to 3GB. On one exchange server that has 180 users, the total size of the store is already at a 110GB. I'm interested to know what solutions you have in place to keep down the size of user's mailboxes. Thanks, Carmila This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email message may contain information that is confidential and proprietary to Babcock Brown or a third party. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy the original and any copies of the original message. Babcock Brown takes measures to protect the content of its communications. However, Babcock Brown cannot guarantee that email messages will not be intercepted by third parties or that email messages will be free of errors or viruses. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Searching User Mailboxes
Well KVS will index right up to phrases if you really want it too and archive off the Email journaling system. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2003 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Searching User Mailboxes Thanks for the suggestions. I will check them out. One person suggested OnTrack's product which looks really intriguing as well as its ability to do bricked restore from non-bricked backups. Licensing blows though. You have to license ALL mailboxes. Resource mailboxes too. And we easily have about 200 conference rooms and pieces of equipment with mailboxes. Thanks! My first drag to boot too! Thanks for a great party. Beer and cookies. Umm ;) Chris (The other white meat) - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:14 AM Subject: RE: Searching User Mailboxes Check out both Sherpa Software and KVS. For companies for which potential litigation is a problem and extended retention policies make more sense than trying to restore x hundred tapes for compliance, I think KVS is probably a better long term solution. Sherpa is probably better for companies with shorter retention policies (generally) IMO. OT: Congrats on the fastest drag time. :) -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 8:25 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Searching User Mailboxes Subject: Searching User Mailboxes Does anyone know of a product that will crawl and index mailboxes on Exchange 5.5? I know Sharepoint and Index Server will do Public Folders, but I haven't heard of anything that will do mailboxes. Mainly, I am thinking, as there is no account that has permissions on all mailboxes by default . . . We are being subpoena for all emails from X years past dealing with X subject . . . Anyone know of one? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: additional display name?
True, you cannot forward out of the company unless you set up a CR, but internal email is OK to forward with the folder assistant. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2003 12:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: additional display name? PF's can't forward mail out, they can only receive mail, at least not without some coding. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: additional display name? IMHO Or you could instead create a PF that directs all email to the recipients renamed Emailbox and have the PF display the old maiden name in brackets (if you wish) Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2003 18:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: additional display name? We do that too.. Forgot to include it. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: additional display name? Additionally, we create a new SMTP addy for their married name, set it as the reply to address and leave the old one. That way, people can still reply to her old e-mails and at some point, they will start to see the new display name. I.E. Paula J Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) now becomes Paula J Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED] AND [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Works for us...YMMV. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: additional display name? We traditionally change the user to the married name (at their request, of course) then add in parenthesis their maiden name: Paula Jones (Smith) Tends to work well. The only way to do what you want would be to create a second mailbox and set the main mailbox as an alternate recipient. That's pretty kludgy to me. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: additional display name? Does anyone know of a way to have both a maiden name and married name appear as distinct display names in the OAB, yet have them both point to the same account? E2ksp3 Thanks, Gordon ___NOTICE_ This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract. ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin
RE: additional display name?
IMHO Or you could instead create a PF that directs all email to the recipients renamed Emailbox and have the PF display the old maiden name in brackets (if you wish) Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 June 2003 18:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: additional display name? We do that too.. Forgot to include it. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: additional display name? Additionally, we create a new SMTP addy for their married name, set it as the reply to address and leave the old one. That way, people can still reply to her old e-mails and at some point, they will start to see the new display name. I.E. Paula J Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) now becomes Paula J Jones ([EMAIL PROTECTED] AND [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Works for us...YMMV. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 4:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: additional display name? We traditionally change the user to the married name (at their request, of course) then add in parenthesis their maiden name: Paula Jones (Smith) Tends to work well. The only way to do what you want would be to create a second mailbox and set the main mailbox as an alternate recipient. That's pretty kludgy to me. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Morrison, Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: additional display name? Does anyone know of a way to have both a maiden name and married name appear as distinct display names in the OAB, yet have them both point to the same account? E2ksp3 Thanks, Gordon ___NOTICE_ This electronic mail transmission contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and then destroy the message. Opinions, conclusions, and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Bain Company shall be understood to be neither given nor endorsed by the Company. When addressed to Bain clients, any information contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions in the governing client contract. ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This
RE: Tracking and auditing Exchange administrators
Jason,
By default the Exchange admin cannot read Emails (same as GroupWise), only
if he has implemented the Q article on how to get round this security. I
would say to set it back so they cannot go into emails.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message-
From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 June 2003 19:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Tracking and auditing Exchange administrators
I have a client that is in the middle of a Groupwise to Exchange 2000
migration. They were a bit unsettled at the discovery that an Exchange
admin can grant himself permission to read anyone's mail (something that
is completely impossible in Groupwise, short of changing the users'
password). They want to know how they can audit whether an admin has
modified the ACL on a mailbox store to grant himself access to anyones
mailbox. I know, I know, you should be able to trust your
administrators, but this is a law firm and it's important that there's a
paper trail.
I've done some testing and come up with the following results. I wanted
to run this by the group to see if anyone can confirm or deny that I'm
using the most appropriate method to perform the auditing.
I've set the local policy on the Exchange server to audit process
tracking and privelege use. I then went into ESM and gave an account
full access to a mailbox store, including send as and receive as rights.
I checked the security logs and found the following 3 events (I actually
found more than 3 events that appeared to be generated when I modified
the permissions, but these 3 seemed most relevant):
Event Type: Success Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category: Privilege Use
Event ID: 577
Date: 6/3/2003
Time: 11:08:06 AM
User: DOMAIN\User
Computer: SERVER
Description:
Privileged Service Called:
Server: Security
Service:-
Primary User Name: User
Primary Domain: DOMAIN
Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x29E68)
Client User Name: -
Client Domain: -
Client Logon ID:-
Privileges: SeIncreaseBasePriorityPrivilege
Event Type: Success Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category: Privilege Use
Event ID: 577
Date: 6/3/2003
Time: 11:08:06 AM
User: DOMAIN\User
Computer: SERVER
Description:
Privileged Service Called:
Server: Security
Service:-
Primary User Name: User
Primary Domain: DOMAIN
Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x29E68)
Client User Name: -
Client Domain: -
Client Logon ID:-
Privileges: SeIncreaseBasePriorityPrivilege
-
Event Type: Success Audit
Event Source: Security
Event Category: Object Access
Event ID: 565
Date: 6/3/2003
Time: 11:08:25 AM
User: DOMAIN\User
Computer: SERVER
Description:
Object Open:
Object Server: Microsoft Exchange
Object Type:Microsoft Exchange Database
Object Name:/o=ORG/ou=First Administrative
Group/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=SERVER/cn=Microsoft Private MDB
New Handle ID: 0
Operation ID: {0,227067}
Process ID: 1636
Primary User Name: SERVER$
Primary Domain: DOMAIN
Primary Logon ID: (0x0,0x3E7)
Client User Name: User
Client Domain: DOMAIN
Client Logon ID:(0x0,0x29E68)
AccessesUnknown specific access (bit 8)
Privileges -
Properties:
Unknown specific access (bit 8)
%{d0780592-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{d74a8762-22b9-11d3-aa62-00c04f8eedd8}
%{d74a8774-2289-11d3-aa62-00c04f8eedd8}
%{cf899a6a-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{cffe6da4-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{cfc7978e-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{d03a086e-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{d74a875e-22b9-11d3-aa62-00c04f8eedd8}
%{cf4b9d46-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{cf0b3dc8-afe6-11d2-aa04-00c04f8eedd8}
%{d74a8766-22b9-11d3-aa62-00c04f8eedd8}
%{d74a8769-22b9-11d3-aa62-00c04f8eedd8}
%{d74a876f-22b9-11d3-aa62-00c04f8eedd8}
-
Does this behavior seem correct? It appears that there's multiple
entries that need to be tracked in order to tell the whole story: Event
ID 577 signifies that privileges have been modified, and then event ID
565 lists the objects that were accessed at the time the privileges were
modified. Not
RE: Archiving Solutions
C2C have active folders at a reasonable price? -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 May 2003 14:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Archiving Solutions Ok, so I know that pst = bad. What can I use for archiving purposes then? I have had a look around but I am totally budget constrained so I imagine that something like EAS (http://www.exchangearchivesolution.com/) is out the question as I bet it costs £££ - similarly commvault et al. Does anyone know of a low cost solution if users want to save email? I am currently researching Microsoft Exchange Server Archiving Agent (EAA) Has anyone used this? Any good? Reading http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7920pg=1show=640 makes me think that this isn't really what I'm after which is some way of users keeping messages in their mailboxes or some other central repository without going over their limit. Disk space is a problem at the moment and I have no money to spend. Anyone got any ideas? Or do I just tell the users to like it or lump it? Site: SBS 2000 sp1 with Exchange 2000 sp3 / windows 2000 sp3 Thanks Rob Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to display the folder...
Err, I though that article Q179065 'Changes to Primary Windows NT account Mailbox Do Not Take Effect' was the workaround (reg change)? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 April 2003 19:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... And it should be reconfigurable. Two hours makes Exchange 5.5 unmanageable. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Unable to display the folder... I didn't see anyone mention that this interval is configurable and covered in the FAQ. But both are true. On 4/1/03 9:42, Smith Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should have thought to Stop/Start the services... Thanks for being kind to a dunce. Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... To force you to restart the services whenever you change something... :-) PS: that means that if you can't wait 2 hours, restarting exchange services will sync the DS and IS, setting the permissions. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April 01, 2003 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... Is there a reason this feature was built-in? Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unable to display the folder... You need to wait a couple of hours for it to actually take. -Original Message- From: Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, We have a E55SP3 running Outlook2K clients. When we changed the Primary NT Account on one of the mailboxes, we have started receiving this error: Unable to display the folder. You do not have permission to log on. Is there a refresh or synchronize that needs to be performed? This is really driving us crazy here. TechNet is a little vague on this issue... Thanks, Joseph Smith Network Administrator Perlos, Inc. 5201 Alliance Gateway Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729 Work: 817-224-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrea Coppini +356 79 ANDREA (263732) [EMAIL PROTECTED] EMPOWER PEOPLE - THE WORLD IN YOUR HAND iWG (iWORLD GROUP) is a global e-mobile company creating, building and growing new businesses. iWG founders are pioneers in creating multi-billion dollar mobile and Internet businesses in Europe, Asia and the US. The Global Partners include the shareholders Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Hikari Tsushin, McCaw, PaineWebber/UBS, The Dolphins' Trust, Perikles Trust and the iAA Advisory Network. www.iWG.info www.countryprofiler.com/iWG Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Moruk buna kesin bak!
Who's a naughty little porn sender, I say stike him off a immediately -Original Message- From: Hakan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 March 2003 22:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moruk buna kesin bak! html head meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=windows-1254 meta name=GENERATOR content=Microsoft FrontPage 4.0 meta name=ProgId content=FrontPage.Editor.Document titleNew Page 1/title /head body bgcolor=#FF00FF text=#00 link=#00 vlink=#00 alink=#00 !-- ImageReady Slices (Dizayn Rulz.psd) -- div align=centerfont color=#FFstrongSADECE BUGUNLUGUNE CANLi /strong/font/div table align=center border=0 cellPadding=0 cellSpacing=0 tbody tr tdimg height=1 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/spacer.gif; width=328/td tdimg height=1 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/spacer.gif; width=1/td tdimg height=1 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/spacer.gif; width=303/td /tr tr tdimg border=0 height=328 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/index_01.gif; useMap=#Map width=328/td td colSpan=2img border=0 height=328 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/index_02.gif; useMap=#Map2 width=304/td /tr tr td colSpan=2img border=0 height=313 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/index_03.gif; useMap=#Map4 width=329/td tdimg border=0 height=313 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/index_04.gif; useMap=#Map3 width=303/td /tr /tbody /table !-- End ImageReady Slices -- div align=center !-- Title: Bizimkizlar.com -- !-- URL: http://www.bizimkizlar.com -- /div div align=center map name=Map area coords=225,92,297,128 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT area coords=217,209,320,288 href=# shape=RECT area coords=318,98,332,127 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT/mapmap name=Map2 area coords=0,98,68,127 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT area coords=83,97,157,129 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT area coords=179,91,253,123 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT area coords=18,209,123,286 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT area coords=142,209,244,286 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT/mapmap name=Map3 area coords=7, 9, 72, 142 http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=101, 17, 167, 117 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=183, 17, 249, 114 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=199, 178, 249, 253http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=126, 178, 180, 256 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=28,157,99,252 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=0, 155, 12, 250 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT /mapmap name=Map4 area coords=267,153,330,249 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=188,146,250,257 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=99,152,173,258 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=220,64,310,136 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=96,64,198,136 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT/map /div /body /html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moruk buna kesin bak!
Just go to the site that is first listed for the space.gif file!! -Original Message- From: K J Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 March 2003 15:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Moruk buna kesin bak! How do you know it's porn? All I can see is some links to exe files which I'm not exactly likely to click. +++ Kathy http://www.vendetta.co.uk DNRC Minister for Useful but Irritating Information and Trivia +++ - Original Message - From: Hurst, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 2:16 PM Subject: RE: Moruk buna kesin bak! Who's a naughty little porn sender, I say stike him off a immediately -Original Message- From: Hakan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 March 2003 22:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moruk buna kesin bak! html head meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=windows-1254 meta name=GENERATOR content=Microsoft FrontPage 4.0 meta name=ProgId content=FrontPage.Editor.Document titleNew Page 1/title /head body bgcolor=#FF00FF text=#00 link=#00 vlink=#00 alink=#00 !-- ImageReady Slices (Dizayn Rulz.psd) -- div align=centerfont color=#FFstrongSADECE BUGUNLUGUNE CANLi /strong/font/div table align=center border=0 cellPadding=0 cellSpacing=0 tbody tr tdimg height=1 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/spacer.gif; width=328/td tdimg height=1 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/spacer.gif; width=1/td tdimg height=1 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/spacer.gif; width=303/td /tr tr tdimg border=0 height=328 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/index_01.gif; useMap=#Map width=328/td td colSpan=2img border=0 height=328 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/index_02.gif; useMap=#Map2 width=304/td /tr tr td colSpan=2img border=0 height=313 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/index_03.gif; useMap=#Map4 width=329/td tdimg border=0 height=313 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/index_04.gif; useMap=#Map3 width=303/td /tr /tbody /table !-- End ImageReady Slices -- div align=center !-- Title: Bizimkizlar.com -- !-- URL: http://www.bizimkizlar.com -- /div div align=center map name=Map area coords=225,92,297,128 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT area coords=217,209,320,288 href=# shape=RECT area coords=318,98,332,127 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT/mapmap name=Map2 area coords=0,98,68,127 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT area coords=83,97,157,129 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT area coords=179,91,253,123 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT area coords=18,209,123,286 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT area coords=142,209,244,286 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT/mapmap name=Map3 area coords=7, 9, 72, 142 http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=101, 17, 167, 117 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=183, 17, 249, 114 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=199, 178, 249, 253http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=126, 178, 180, 256 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=28,157,99,252 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=0, 155, 12, 250 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT /mapmap name=Map4 area coords=267,153,330,249 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=188,146,250,257 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=99,152,173,258 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=220,64,310,136 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=96,64,198,136 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT/map /div /body /html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views
RE: Moruk buna kesin bak!
And no, there is no way am I going to run there perverted EXE's -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 March 2003 15:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moruk buna kesin bak! Just go to the site that is first listed for the space.gif file!! -Original Message- From: K J Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31 March 2003 15:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Moruk buna kesin bak! How do you know it's porn? All I can see is some links to exe files which I'm not exactly likely to click. +++ Kathy http://www.vendetta.co.uk DNRC Minister for Useful but Irritating Information and Trivia +++ - Original Message - From: Hurst, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 2:16 PM Subject: RE: Moruk buna kesin bak! Who's a naughty little porn sender, I say stike him off a immediately -Original Message- From: Hakan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 March 2003 22:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moruk buna kesin bak! html head meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=windows-1254 meta name=GENERATOR content=Microsoft FrontPage 4.0 meta name=ProgId content=FrontPage.Editor.Document titleNew Page 1/title /head body bgcolor=#FF00FF text=#00 link=#00 vlink=#00 alink=#00 !-- ImageReady Slices (Dizayn Rulz.psd) -- div align=centerfont color=#FFstrongSADECE BUGUNLUGUNE CANLi /strong/font/div table align=center border=0 cellPadding=0 cellSpacing=0 tbody tr tdimg height=1 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/spacer.gif; width=328/td tdimg height=1 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/spacer.gif; width=1/td tdimg height=1 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/spacer.gif; width=303/td /tr tr tdimg border=0 height=328 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/index_01.gif; useMap=#Map width=328/td td colSpan=2img border=0 height=328 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/index_02.gif; useMap=#Map2 width=304/td /tr tr td colSpan=2img border=0 height=313 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/index_03.gif; useMap=#Map4 width=329/td tdimg border=0 height=313 src=http://www.kizarkadasim.com/index_04.gif; useMap=#Map3 width=303/td /tr /tbody /table !-- End ImageReady Slices -- div align=center !-- Title: Bizimkizlar.com -- !-- URL: http://www.bizimkizlar.com -- /div div align=center map name=Map area coords=225,92,297,128 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT area coords=217,209,320,288 href=# shape=RECT area coords=318,98,332,127 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT/mapmap name=Map2 area coords=0,98,68,127 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT area coords=83,97,157,129 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT area coords=179,91,253,123 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT area coords=18,209,123,286 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT area coords=142,209,244,286 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/2117/canlicanli.exe; shape=RECT/mapmap name=Map3 area coords=7, 9, 72, 142 http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=101, 17, 167, 117 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=183, 17, 249, 114 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=199, 178, 249, 253http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=126, 178, 180, 256 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=28,157,99,252 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=0, 155, 12, 250 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT /mapmap name=Map4 area coords=267,153,330,249 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=188,146,250,257 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=99,152,173,258 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=220,64,310,136 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT area coords=96,64,198,136 href=http://64.239.44.20/dialers/1074/pelin.exe; shape=RECT/map /div /body /html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential
Microsoft Zero Admin kit
Hi, Is anyone else have any problems downloading the NT4 ZAK? PLEASE NOTE we can access the page http://www.microsoft.com/ntworkstation/downloads/Recommended/Featured/NTZAK. asp but cannot then when selecting the 'download now' button which brings up the page http://www.microsoft.com/ntworkstation/downloads/bin/zak/zak.exe which is where the 'page not found' is generated from (IE try going to this page not NTZAK.asp page). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Encryption Solutions for Exchange 5.5
Kevin, Implement the Exchange 5.5 own encryption system KMS, if it's for your own Outlook users?(doesn't work for strangers). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Kevin Bachelder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 March 2003 14:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption Solutions for Exchange 5.5 Hi all, We are a small company using Exchange 5.5 and our company has several doctors and medical groups who are clients. With the new HIPAA regulations regarding patient information privacy going into effect soon we may need to encrypt our outbound email messages so that they can only be read by the intended recipient. Can anyone recommend products or solutions we could use to accomplish this? Thanks in advance, Kevin -- Kevin Bachelder Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer - Windows NT 4.0 (MCSE) Microsoft Certified Professional - Windows 2000 (MCP) Citrix Certified Administrator (CCA) CompTIA A+ Certified Computer Repair Technician (A+) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations.....
I would say it depends on the company, as my last place we had 15 Exch Admins just for the UK, god know how many more in the US Europe, Asia. Each of different levels and responsibilities for different areas of Exchange (backup, external, interconnection with notes, basic admin, security/encryption, hardware/OS), so I would have thought it depends on the site structure if they would need to know. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 March 2003 00:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations. Hell, many Exchange administrators aren't involved with e-mail judging from the SMTP and DNS questions I see! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations. No kidding. But then again, not all Windows sysadmins are involved with email -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Erik L. Vesneski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations. Well they should - mail uses it. Erik L. Vesneski Sr. Systems Specialist www.pmigroup.com Ph#: 925-685-6161 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 5:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations. I find as a group (and this is a gross generalization), Windows sysadmins don't know crap about DNS. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Lum, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations. The same way some of us are NT/W2K Network Administrators without completely understanding DNS. It happens, and then it becomes learn or leave. Dave Lum - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sr. Network Specialist - Textron Financial 503-675-5510 -Original Message- From: Wendel, Jesse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 13:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SPAM blockin software recommendations. I never understood how anyone could be a mail admin without REALLY understanding DNS. Which I do. That isn't meant as a dig at you, Roger, or at anyone else. I mean it just as I said it. And yes - you're correct; if your dns is messed up, neither sendmail or qmail is going work, for sure. DNS and mail MX and reverse lookup Screw up? Mail flow stops. Have a good weekend everyone. May your pager and cell phone remain silent. Jesse Wendel Sr. Technical Systems Analyst Primary Messaging/DNS Administrator www.pse.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of
RE: exchange 2000
Richard, Search MS for the Q article on how to allow the admin full access, as the Admin doesn't by default have permissions to access the email boxes on 2000. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 March 2003 15:30 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exchange 2000 Hello, I just upgraded our server from windows nt with exchange 5.5 to windows 2000 serv with exchange 2000. I have two questions so maybe you guys could help me before i go out and buy a book this afternoon. Does anyone know how to have the administrator account access everyones maybox from outlook. For example if i log into my workstation as administrator and set the profile to any user in outlook and open it, it should open like it did in exchange 5.5. Second question I have two public folders that recieve alot of email and I set it up in exchange 5.5 to delete items older than 5 days. I cant find out where to configure this in exchange 2000. Thanks Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HIdden Mailboxes
John, Create it add it to the users outlook, then hide it. User will be able to access it but no one will 'see' it in the GAL. Cheers Paul -Original Message- From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 March 2003 14:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HIdden Mailboxes Exchange 5.5 - SP4 W2K - SP3 I guess it's not possible to hide a mailbox and still be able to access it by another user?? How do you handle a situation where, for example, you are replacing an employee so you are going to have a mailbox set up to receive responses to an advertisement. But you don't want that mailbox to be visible to the rest of the users since they will most likely figure out what's going on?? Thanks, John Orban System Administrator The Country School www.countryschool.org _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook on Win XP SP1 can't connect to Exchange server
What OS is the Exch? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 February 2003 21:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook on Win XP SP1 can't connect to Exchange server I have a customer who has been connecting to our Exchange servers just fine with MAPI Outlook, across the Internet. They have been receiving new PCs from Dell that are already preconfigured with Windows XP SP1. And for some reason users on those PCs cannot connect to Exchange anymore. I asked him to check the XP's built-in firewall. He says it is disabled. I did an RPC Ping test with him. From old PCs RPC Ping worked fine. But it failed on the new XP SP1 PCs. What else could there be wrong with XP SP1 that would kill RPCs? Thanks for any ideas! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Files zipped when sent out
Carine, C2C have a product that does that(can't remember the name) but have a look on their site www.c2c.com Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Carine Lim, Sr.SystEng, SCSM/NSB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 February 2003 04:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Files zipped when sent out Hello Everyone, May I know which 3rd party software (that works well with Exchange) which will automatically zip files when sent out.! Thank you Cheers! Carine Safeguard your company with cost-effective disaster recovery services. Find out more at http://www.scs.com.my/proService9.asp or contact us at 03 - 79565800 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Antivirus for exchange..follow-up
Danny, Do not scan the logs (dir,stores) directories. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Nunez, Danny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 February 2003 17:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Antivirus for exchange..follow-up One a similar subject. NT 4.0 sp6a, Exchange 5.5 sp4 (?) with OWA on the server box. Besides AV for the Exchange, I also have an AV software scanning the disks and scanning disk accesses. I have excluded pub.mdb, priv.mdb and the pagefile from the AV scan. My question: Is there anything else I should exclude from the scan? Say log files or MTA directories? I have not heard performance complaints from the users (the box is not overloaded by any stretch of the imagination) but do not want to cause trouble with the smooth operation of the box. Any suggestion or advice is greatly appreciated. TIA Danny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mustafa E. Senyuz Sent: 20 February 2003 10:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Antivirus for exchange Hi, I'm trying to find a good antivirus solution for exchange. I checked out Norton AV for Exchange, McCafee and TrendMicro's antivirus for exchange. TrendMicro's seems good. Which one do you advice? Or is there any better product? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Flusing log files - almost out of space
Pat, You need to check the header info (/mk) to see up to which log files have been committed and remove the ones before only. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Pat Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 February 2003 16:03 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Flusing log files - almost out of space NT 4 SP6 (I think) Ex 5.5 SP4 - single org, site, server One problem led to many others. Drive with the log files (also the system drive) ran low on space, so the MTA stopped. I cleared some stuff off the drive to get up to 150MB. MTA started, and it's working. The disk space problem also caused BENT to not run correctly because it couldn't write the catalog to the disk (space was down to 7MB when I got there on Monday). I believe that this caused the Exchange logs to not get flushed. The logs now comprise 3GB of space (and growing). One successful backup has run since, but again, the logs aren't flushed. My question is (to refresh my memory)... Can I stop Exchange, copy the logs to another drive for archiving, then kill the originals, and restart Exchange? If I recall, it should recreate new log files, correct? (I'm making the assumption that the transactions in the logs are committed). It looks like the drive that the store is on has plenty of space (including enough to defrag the store, etc). All services are running fine. But obviously, I need to clear those logs, and want to make sure it's how I remember it. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trend AV problem
Hi, Anybody come across the problem with Trend Scanmail vers 3.51 or 3.52, not able to duplicate the AV package to the server AND update the server selection. We have a server that gets the package from Trend WWW site and update it's own AV and have the rest of the servers get their updates from this. IE When selecting to update the server only - it works. When selecting to 'duplicate the package' onto this server - it works. When selecting to update and 'duplicate the package', it duplicates the package BUT does not run it's own update. Here in the UK you have to go through your dealer for problems and at the moment they are just getting me to go through hoops unnecessarily (IE check proxy settings, run without 'duplicate package' selected to see it works IE they haven't listened to my explanation). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
Paul, I normally install the Exchange 5.0 client on my Windows 2000 servers that require MAPI. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 OK, well AFAIK Outlook is the only mapi client for 2000, so I guess that equates to don't have a mapi client installed on the server? I'm struggling to think of a reason we'd need one, it just struck me as the sort of thing that might crop up further down the line... I've also just mailed Trend to get their take on Scanmail mapi/avapi vs. Scanmail ESE - I believe there are still potential Microsoft support issues with ESE scanners? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] One thing you do not want to do is install Outlook on your Exchange server due to possible MAPI conflict between Outlook and Exchange server version. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Hmm.. I only sent that once - hope this one doesn't appear twice as well! One thing just occurred to me. What's the consensus on having a Mapi client installed on the Exchange server? It's the sort of thing that I could imagine might be required at some point down the line, so I'm wondering if it would be better to install it prior to installing Exchange? Presumably Outlook is the only Windows 2000 Mapi client as Windows 2000 doesn't come with the old slim line Exchange Client AFAIK? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings Sent: 13 February 2003 12:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] I'm probably being a little paranoid here, but I want to get this right first time :-) I'm adding two new boxes into our Exchange 5.5 SP4 site to migrate the existing boxes off onto (thanks Ed for the SMM). The new servers are Windows 2000 SP3 member servers with the following: Terminal Services in Remote Admin mode IIS removed IE6 SP1 installed Relevant Critical Updates Exchange service account in local admins group Installed MBSA to keep up with patches etc.. Installed Dell Openmanage hardware monitoring.. These are dedicated Exchange boxes, the only additional third party software will be Trend Scanmail and a Rightfax connector on one of the boxes. Right now I think I'm ready to stick the Exchange CD in and get going, but I guess better safe than sorry - can anyone think of anything obvious that I've forgotten? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed
RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000
Paul, It is either available on 5.0 CD or Select CD's (could be elsewhere) but that's where I get mine. If haven't got it wait until after 18:00 GMT then you will ;-) Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 Thanks Paul - do you know if that's downloadable (legitimately)? I remember looking for it a while back and I just couldn't find it anywhere. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 024 7635 5378, Fax: 024 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 February 2003 13:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing 5.5 on Windows 2000 [bcc] Paul, I normally install the Exchange 5.0 client on my Windows 2000 servers that require MAPI. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas BLB
Maybe it now uses the same technology as Ontrack and their recovery product for Exchange mailboxes? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 February 2003 19:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas BLB Nothing is impossible Erik, but like you I'm dubious. I'd certainly want to see this claim proven over a long period of time before I'd let their BLB solution in the same room as one of my servers let alone installed. And lets face it, if you run with the latest and greatest versions of exchange and stick to good practice on deleted item / mailbox retention there ain't that much reason to miss BLBs. Rob -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon 10/02/2003 18:56 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: RE: Veritas BLB I'd be wary of the claim that a BLB solution retains/supports SIS. Methinks they are mutually exclusive. Check the FAQ/Archives for the various and correct arguments against BLB of any type. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Veritas BLB Internet.com said this got rejected. So I'll try again. I just got done installing Veritas 9, the upgrade gagged so I spent 3 = hours on the phone with veritas fixing everything. They are so backed up that = any call more than a few minutes immediately goes to upper level tech = support. The guy mentioned how much better 9 is and mentioned that it can do BLB pretty well now. The support SIS etc. Anyone have any input on this? I already have read the BLBs are bad stuff. But I'm interested to see = what people have say. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] .+--xm ,)r(ື \bွ!￶ 0 六zǚ1r̬:.˛ m隊[hy\z[,)rɄZZvh'+-i٢2ȞG( ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Luckily he didn't work in Slough then?[1] [1] More UK humour. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 February 2003 12:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects Wow, 116 ish posts on this crock of sh1t. Anyway, Mr Muir deserves some compensation for having to work in Luton [1] [1] UK joke... Rob MCSE + a, b, c thru to I MVPE A+ CNNE BA (hons) A-levels GCSE's This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange2003
Allison, You probably mentioned 'Microsoft' 'catch' 'Charge' '$' in the same sentence ;-) Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 January 2003 12:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange2003 Thanks, Tom. I realized that I sounded like a newb asking that, but I only recently began administering Windows and so never ordered anything from them. What did I say to offend the content filter at [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. Place = Exchange Discussions; ; ; Exchange Discussions Sender = Allison M. Wittstock Subject = Re: Exchange2003 Delivery Time = January 30, 2003 (Thursday) 06:44:31 Policy = Sexual Discrimination Action on this mail = Quarantine message Warning message from administrator: Sender, Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail. On Thursday 30 January 2003 05:12 pm, Alverson, Tom wrote: No catch, no survey. I just had to pay for the shipping (about $10 ??) with a credit card. Not sure if they ship everywhere. Check it out at: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/evaluation/ti/beta.asp where you can download Exchange 2003 but not Outlook http://microsoft.order-5.com/exchangetitaniumbeta/routing.asp?type=1 Link on the above page to order the CD with both exchange2003 and outlook 11 (link is not working right now). Tom -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange2003 Do you know if they will ship anywhere in the world? I am in Berlin. Also, is there a catch? Like having to fill out a survey, and if you don't they will charge you $100? On Thursday 30 January 2003 03:11 pm, you wrote: I just got an email that my free CD shipped yesterday with an Airborne tracking number. Tom -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 Nope that is one you have to wait for on the CD. Bxstxrds -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable forwarding, but allowing users to send emails to outs ide of a company...
Brian, There is no real point as the user just inserts the original email into a new email and sends it. Unless you just want to make it a tadge more difficult to send existing emails out? Cheers Paul Hurst Senior Email Analyst -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Disable forwarding, but allowing users to send emails to outside of a company... Hello. Exchange 5.5 SP4 with Outlook 2000 and 2002 users environment. I understand that there's an option to disable automatic replies and autofowarding in IMS. However, does anyone know if there's an option to allow users to send new emails to other SMTP servers, but do not allow forwarding (manually) e-mails to other SMTP servers? I guess it really doesn't make sense to me, but can anyone explain if it's true? Is it an Outlook function (I have been using Outlook since Outlook 97 days, but I don't remember find this feature.)? The reason I am asking is that one of Director used to work in a company that disabled forwarding, but allow users to send new e-mails and he is wondering why we are not doing it. Thank you in advance, Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN
You can always try Veritas other backup product Netbackup? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2003 14:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN That's not entirely true. Having used ArkenServer and BackupExec on the same hardware, BuEX was 2-3 times faster doing Exchange backups, from the same servers to the same hardware. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Bendall, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN Surely the choice of backup device will have a greater effect on backup performance than the software. Backing up to a local drive is going to be faster than sending it across the network to a centralised DAT device. SDLT devices are faster than DLT, etc., etc. In addition you need to compromise between backup speed and restore speed. We have a dedicated backup LAN to SDLT and LTO robots, the backup is streamlined across tape drives, while backup is fast restore times are becoming a problem. Regards, Paul -Original Message- From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2003 14:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN NT Backup is BE Lite. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Weatherly, Rob Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 7:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN Does NTBackup backup exchange faster than BE would I am just curious because I am looking for a way to improve our exchange backups (E2K, W2K, and BE 8.6) Rob Weatherly -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN BackupExec works really well, but let me suggest an alternative. Run NTBackup and backup Exchange to a disk file, then back that file up with a normal file backup from NetBackup. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Walbert, Bryan (Bryan) % [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup solution for Exchange 2000 on an EMC SAN What backup/restore solutions are recommended for a large Exchange 2000 cluster running on an EMC SAN. We have been running netbackup for our Exchange 5.5 environment, and have been quite dissatisfied with its performance. Bryan Walbert agere systems Wintel Architecture, Engineering and Standards MS Exchange/Windows Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 610 712 5874 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. -- _ List posting FAQ:
RE: The SEC is killing me.
Rick, KVS vault can archive the Journal automatically as it is placed in there, so you don't build a massive Journal email size. Then use KVS with its indexing feature to fully searchable emails (including inside attachments). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2003 00:32 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. Google is your friend... Search phrases like 'SEC Compiant email' aren't that hard to conjure. OK, I'll play nice: http://www.tumbleweed.com/en/industries/financial_services/ http://www.optical.com/ You could probably configure http://www.ixos.com or http://www.kvault.com to meet the needs as well. Gary -Original Message- From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 19:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. That was also discussed as a solution but here is why we said no to that one: In one scenario the SEC requested all e-mails from 7 individuals relating to insider trading from a specific period of 7 days. Now if we utilized the Back-up scenario we would have had to do 3 different restores (because the users were spread across 3 different sites and then exmerge the data into 7 different PST'sbut what if we have some smart users here and not only did they delete the message but the removed it from the deleted items retention? A backup won't catch that.Not so far fetched. The Journal is mutch easier to manage from our perspective its just difficult to search. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The SEC is killing me. Just have a 90-day backup tape retention policy. - Original Message - From: Clemens, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:05 PM Subject: The SEC is killing me. Mixed Exchange 5.5 SP4 / Exchange 2000 SP3 100% Active Directory 100% Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4 Our Legal and Security department wants us to provide the ability to access every e-mail the company sends or receives for a period of 90 days to satisfy certain SEC requirements. The original plan was to Journal everything into a mailbox using an Exchange 5.5 server. It worked in so far as all the mail went to the mailbox...but...After it got over 100 messages outlook didn't do a very good job searching it. So we moved the Journal to Exchange 2000 and are Indexing it. With 50 messages so far Outlook searches it pretty fast. So far so good. I guess my questions iswhat is everyone else out there doing to satisfy SEC requirements for Electronic Documents Retention? Is there a better way? Or Better Software? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: The SEC is killing me.
Craig, You remembered Smartware and Smartware II (or was that Smartware plus a bit), like that product as it was one of the first. Earned me £££'s doing macros work. Loved it for that. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2003 01:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The SEC is killing me. This will not help you with your SEC problem. It's just a musing and is merely to suggest that no audit technique is fool proof. I think that any system that you can design, a clever person can get around. Let me suggest a scenario from back in the days when I was working on virus delivery techniques and counter measures. The key to this particular almost impossible to detect nefarious message delivery technique would be to send a message to an external mailbox that had a client running against it with in-box rules enabled. The client could parse the message and execute a script or even an external program that would generate another message, which could be sent to any smtp address (or in the case of a virus, do nefarious things on its own local network). So let's say I send a one word message to my home mailbox that says hi. That could trigger a script that sends a message to tell someone to sell. Another script triggered by dinner tonight could trigger a script that generates the buy message. You get the idea. The offending message itself can be as simple or complex but apparently harmless cipher that you could imagine. It could even be embedded in a pattern that looks like I'm sending a daily (or better yet, apparently random and occasional) note commenting on tonight's menu, with an if message text contains filter at the other end. A hindered word note that contained the phrase rare steak could be the trigger. The to address is not that of the ultimate recipient, and the instruction in a form that you could detect is beyond the reach of your archives and searches. There reality is, that you simply cannot filter for this sort of thing in your archives. You can find someone that is being stupid or careless, but not someone that is cunning and deliberate. The extent to which variations on this technique can be used is frightening. Consider what a batch file on a DOS machine could do, in terms of generating an Assembly language program by having VB Script simply write stings from an Excel or Word document to a text file. The VB Script does not even have to travel with the Office document, but can simply be running on the machine on the receiving end. Such a trigger can be hidden behind layer upon layer of isolating techniques. The initial trigger instruction does not have to be sent via SMTP. A FAX to something like a SatisFAXtion modem or a call to an IVR system listening for a specific DMTF sequence that would not be recorded by your phone system can do it. A web site can do it. Web mail to your home smtp address can do it. A cellular call . . . You get the idea. Every link will leave some tracks, but those tracks can be incomplete and look very harmless. Back in the 80's before Microsoft Office became the dominant office suite, there was a product called Smartware by a small company in Lenexa, Kansas that was later purchased by Informix and destroyed. Smartware had the equivalent of VBA in all of its modules, and it had a communications module. The second version of the package even had PEEK and POKE instructions. Imagine what you could do with that today in and administrative security context on a Win2K machine in an Internet world. Nedry (a transposition of nerdy) is still out there. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The SEC is killing me. There are a number of archival solutions out there. Some of them are listed at www.mail-resources.com in addition to the ones Gary mentioned. Contact me offline, I might have some other ideas. On 1/15/03 17:05, Clemens, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mixed Exchange 5.5 SP4 / Exchange 2000 SP3 100% Active Directory 100% Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4 Our Legal and Security department wants us to provide the ability to access every e-mail the company sends or receives for a period of 90 days to satisfy certain SEC requirements. The original plan was to Journal everything into a mailbox using an Exchange 5.5 server. It worked in so far as all the mail went to the mailbox...but...After it got over 100 messages outlook didn't do a very good job searching it. So we moved the Journal to Exchange 2000 and are Indexing it. With 50 messages so far Outlook searches it pretty fast. So far so good. I guess my questions iswhat is everyone else out there doing to satisfy SEC requirements for Electronic Documents Retention? Is there a better way? Or Better Software?
RE: Customizing the uncustomizable
I don't know if the developers one is the same but I found one in RLtools.exe package. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Lentz, Wayne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2003 19:47 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable Resource Hacker could probably do it. http://www.users.on.net/johnson/resourcehacker/ -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable MCS only. -Original Message- From: Walden H. Leverich III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable Is RLQuickED a MCS-provided only tool, or something publically available. A quick Google on RLQuickED didn't turn up anything. -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -Original Message- From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable We worked with MCS and they provided me with the RLQuickED utility. It was not intuitive to use and took me about 2 hours of playing with the utility to understand how it worked. Afterwards I was able to modify the dll change text and add additional paragraphs that made better sense and was customized for our environment. We have not had any problems, and this dll is used on all 4 of our exchange 2000 servers in production. Jason Qualcomm, Inc. -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 6:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable The nasty bit is where it then goes on and suggests moving items to your PST file which is something most of us are trying to avoid at all costs! I've tried out the RLQuikED tool to edit the dll which contains this message in the past following an old posting on this list (in a test lab), but it's not something I would ever consider using in production. MCS or someone like Chris Scharff are one solution to edit the actual message. However a simpler possibly cheaper solution might be to simply script some automatic message when your monitoring/reporting software detects a mailbox over a certain size. Mark -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 January 2003 14:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Customizing the uncustomizable What's so hard to understand about, you're over your limit, please reduce the size of your mailbox. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:17 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Customizing the uncustomizable Subject: Customizing the uncustomizable Does the hard-coded 'mailbox limits warning' message (my description) unique to a specific file? If so, perhaps I could hex-edit the darn thing to say something more meaningful.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ??
The newer version of BE (8 onwards) you can backup to disc. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2003 18:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ntbackup vs. Veritas for Exch 5.5 D/R ?? Our old exchange box is running NT4 and exchange 5.5 with veritas backup exec 7.3 (and the exchange addon). I have just set up a new server with win2k server and exchange 5.5 and I am considering just using ntbackup for D/R (disaster recovery). I understand the adavantages of the Veritas backup database for file backup and recovery, but in the case of recovering an exchange server I'm not sure what extra I am getting from veritas. One thing that ntbackup will do that I have not been able to do with Veritas is backup to a file. With Ntbackup, I can do a full backup to another hard drive and then another second complete backup to a tape every night. I can still have the tapes offsite etc, but now also have a much faster restore off of another hard drive. Tom Alverson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help!!!
Vanessa, You are using the same server in the site to view the object (if you go to a n other server it m8ight not have the update yet and you are trying to view the old object). Cheers Paul (just down the road from you, Brooklands) Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2003 09:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Help!!! I deleted a user's mailbox and recreated it (they had deleted all mail I have .pst file for recovery from backup) The object appears on the server on which it was created on but if I click on it it says the object cannot be found, this may be because replication has not completed It has been like this now for 18 hours!! What to do, Ex5.5 sp4 etc. thanks Vanessa Watkins Network Manager Royal Holloway, University of London Tel: 01784 443728 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email
I would clearing down the rules for that mailbox (via 'OOFRULES') incase there is a corruption within the rules area for that mailbox and then try again. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 January 2003 16:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email I have the exact same rule for another mailbox that works properly. I have also tried to create this rule from different clients, so I assume the problem is server side. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:28 PM Posted To: MS Exchange Mailing List Conversation: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email Subject: RE: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email Then pursue the second option...or the rules are too complex and try simplifying your rule. -Original Message- From: MS Exchange Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Trouble with creating a rule in Outlook to forward email Using Outlook 2k connecting to Exchange 5.5 I am trying to set a rule to forward all email to a different external email. The error message says: Changes to the rule could not be saved. There is not enough memory or the rules are too complex. Try deleting some rules This is the only rule I have and my email box is empty. Any ideas? Found nothing on Technet or Google search. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem
Harold, JFYI The file Brian is referring to is a 'patch' EXE that runs and implements the holidays, so therefore not requiring any imports etc; Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: WAISEL, HAROLD B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2003 14:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem Here are some instructions I wrote that we posted for our users (you need to add the Outlook.txt file). There is also a separate article, Q197415, that tells you how to update shared calendars in Public Folders. 1. Save this file to the following location on your PC (right click on the file and choose Save As): c:\program files\microsoft office\office\1033 NOTE: Click YES if you receive the message The file OUTLOOK.TXT already exists. Do you want to replace the existing file? 2. From your Inbox, click on the menu bar and choose Tools, Options, Calendar Options, Add Holidays. 3. Click on the Calendar Options... button 4. Click on the Add Holidays... button 5. Check the boxes for the holidays in the countries you want added to your calendar. Click OK. This will add holidays from 2003-2006. **THIS IS ONLY FOR YOUR PERSONAL CALENDARS, NOT FOR SHARED CALENDARS IN PUBLIC FOLDERS*** -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 8:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem This message was sent back in mid December, but I thought I send another email with updated info about Outlook 2000 Holiday patch from Microsoft. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=7d4d9017-8d4e-4 963-8ba7-d2e91d491f5eDisplayLang=en Above patch will add Holidays 'till 2007 to Outlook 2000 clients. Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ken Cornetet Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem Find your outlook.txt file and manually add the missing holidays. Then, go back to outlook and re-add holidays. -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem Hi, When any of our users add holidays in Outlook 2000, it adds them just fine for 2002 but not 2003. It's like they aren't reoccurring. We are running Exchange 2000 and have about 750 users. I have tried changing the computer clock to 2003 and then adding holidays but they still only populate 2002. I can't seem to find any KB articles on this. Has anyone seen this behavior? Thanks, Aaron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Holiday additions.
Robert, use the method explained in the 'Holidays in Outlook 2000 Problem' current thread (Outlook.txt file) Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 January 2003 15:15 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Holiday additions. Exchange 5.5, NT 4.0, Outlook 98. Is there any way to add company Holidays to everybody's Outlook Calendar in the organization? Thanks. Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: some messages to the deleted items
Tia, I have seen this with a rule that has gone corrupt and moves certain messages (that when viewing the text should not be affected) since the code that does the moving does not reflect the text rule you see. I have found only way to find which one is to disable one by one to find the corrupt one. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Microsoft Exchange List Server [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 January 2003 19:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: some messages to the deleted items MSX5.5+SP4 Outlook2002/Outlook2000 we have received two reports form differents users that *two* incoming messages do not show up in the inbox but arrived directly to the deleted items, the clients have no outlook rules to do that. wehave noticed that the messages were *high importance* ones, we can not duplicate the issue (even after sending high importance messages back) Have you seen this before? any ideas? tia -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or suppo rt
Bill, In the UK you now cannot speak directly with Trend Tech support anymore, you have to go through a distributor :-( Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 December 2002 21:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: could use opinions on Trend or Symantec product and or support Would anyone be will to give me their 2 cent on Trends Support? Why... I am considering moving to trends products or Symantec products (from another vendor to remain name less) It seems Trend gets good talk here...but Ive been testing it some (not all at this point yet) Ive had an occasion where the scan product missed a IRC Trojan... where Symantec detected it. Ive talked to trend two days ago and as of yet no response...another call to them a while ago did not leave me with the warm fuzzies... so opinions of either of the above products would be welcome. Exch55, NT4/ W2K, desktop the whole suite thingy' thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Legato
Tony, Have you tried Netbackup from Veritas? (I assume by Veritas you were referring to there BE product). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 December 2002 16:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Legato Then is it like more like Tivoli? I have used CA, Veritas, HP SureStore, and Palindrome (Seagate). I have touched Tivoli but just doing restore/recovery for Exchange. Tivoli has so much to it than the other it seems. - Original Message - From: Ken Cornetet [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 10:54 AM Subject: RE: Legato We use Legato here for backing up pretty much everything. It can be infuriating when it doesn't work and their tech support is lousy. On the other hand, if Legato says something is backed up, you can rest assured you can recover it if need be. Their BSM (business suite modules) for Exchange seem to work just fine - I've only encountered one problem which you can avoid by making sure you have the latest Legato server software. One thing to watch for: don't run clients that are newer than the server version - that isn't support and can get you in trouble. Clients older than the server are OK. Legato is solid and flexible, but it is also complicated. If you are going to be the primary Legato person, expect a LARGE learning curve. You may want to consider contracting out support to a third party - particularly if using a complex tape jukebox. Above all, TEST TEST TEST! -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 4:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Legato I have been asked to work with Legato for backing up of Exchange 5.5 and 2000 and also Window Servers. Anything that is a gotcha that I should look out for. It will be my first time using this software. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eoo.log files
Jeff, What dates do these files start from? if your backup say ran last night and you have transactions logs a lot older than when the backup started to run then it is not clearing them down. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Jeffery Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 December 2002 17:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eoo.log files I use Achserve exchange agent to backup this server but it is not clearing out these files, as i type there are 12 gig of these files. I know that I can set exchange to send this files to bigger drive. But they are not going away, like they are suppose to. -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eoo.log files Holy Cow! Don't delete these files! Use NTBACKUP to backup Exchange and the files with *automagically* disappear. -Kevin -Original Message- From: Jeffery Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, December 05, 2002 8:42 AM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: eseutil Subject: eoo.log files My exchange server is creating a series of log files in the MDBData dir. These files are 5mg files and are taking up a lot of space on the server. I know that I can delete these file and exchange will still work. I cannot find a way to make exchange stop logging this series on files. any help would be nice. Example log file name: EA3E.log Thanks, Jeff _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine
A bit like asking the similarities of plasma and CRT, they do similar jobs but have definite different dis/advantages. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Steven Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 December 2002 15:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine I think you'll find anti-BE sentiment is kinda rare around these parts. I suppose you meant just did *not* cut it which is surprising as its handling a 150+ server environment here very well, and I can't recall the last time a fellow sysadmin stated a dislike for the product. On the flipside, I'm showing my ignorance by noting that I'd never heard of commvault galaxy and spectra logic until now :) What features did you find compelling over BE? s -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine We updated allright, we tossed the product. For a 60 server site backup exec just did cut it. We run CommVault galaxy with a spectra logic library now, easy living. -Original Message- From: Mustafa Ibrahim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 5:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine Sorry Hansen, but not according to my NT4 SP6a with Exchange 5.5/SP4 and Backup Exec 8.0. It is idle at 0% when no backup is running with all services running as per normal. I personally don't see why an idle backup software engine should take up 50% of CPU usage when in fact it isn't doing much at all. Perhaps you need an update fix from veritas. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 December 2002 20:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Backup Exec Engine Speaking from past experience, yes. -Original Message- From: Johnny Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Veritas Backup Exec Engine Hi all, Is it normal for the bengine.exe to be taking 50% CPU usage when no backups are running? Johnny _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't delete email
Hey try Daz (soap powder in the UK) it suppose to SHIFT most stubborn of stains/stuff. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 27 November 2002 19:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can't delete email Nope. Didn't try that.it worked by doing shift + del. Thanks -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can't delete email Does it show up in OWA? And did you try deleting it through OWA? Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can't delete email I have an email which one of my users received from Omaha Steaks which cannot be deleted.Get an unknown error when trying to delete. I cannot find the message on my Server, message tracking is turned on. Exchange 2000 sp3. Any ideas? TIA Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP
Tony, What make is it BO, Pink or something even more up or down market? and I agree with you about belts (my last one I forgot to unclip it so it sketched :-( Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 November 2002 20:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP I still enjoy my turntable. Some people when they come over are in awe that they still exist. It's even manual. Although finding belts for it is getting tough. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:38 PM Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP Both. Home offices all over the place. We are a music distributor. These people are the ones that stock the shelves at your local Kmart or Walmart with music. They are in the store all day long stocking shelves so they don't have connectivity. Thank you, Alex Gonzalez Senior Systems Administrator Handleman Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] (248) 362-4400 Ext. 4914 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Who sends them all this stuff? Is it the home office, or is it a number of people all over the place? -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP Actually they don't check their email all day. They just download the days mail and read that till the next day. We are trying to implement wireless cards so that they can always check mail. Right now its too inconsistent for our reps. They stock CD's at stores and there is too much RF in many for it to work. Plus there isn't enough 3G coverage yet nationally. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Lets see 800 users 40 incoming lines. Assume each person checks his email 8 times a day and stays on for 20 minutes. Twenty people per line. There are 3600 minutes in a day. Eight accesses, times twenty people, times 20 minutes per call comes out to 3200. Wow I would like to see that phone bill. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:38 PM Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP Still waiting for you to provide a shining example of how I ought to be doing it by tackling all of those hard technical questions with gusto and aplomb. But as usual it seems you're much more inclined to engage in silly banter or name calling. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Wow.Chris being a total jerk again. Come on tell me something new :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gonzalez, Alex Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 11:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Command Switch or 3rd Party software for Send/Recieve on OXP Your being a total jerk about this question. I don't see what isn't technical about this question. It wasn't a question of what our people do, its how to automate our systems so they don't have to do as much manual work and bill for it. Daniel Chenault hit the nail on the head. It is creating a technical solution for a non technical problem. Isn't that what technology does? I apologize if I didn't give enough detail. These users are all on dialup and receive large emails with large attachments (pictures mainly) all day. When they go to synchronize their inbox it can take up to 2 hours for all the mail to download. The company doesn't want them billing for the time it takes to sit in front of their laptops waiting for it to download. They would rather schedule it at night and just have the rep read it while they are in the field the next day. As far as the question goes here is a refresher: Does anyone know of a command switch for Outlook.exe in Outlook XP that I could create a scheduled task that would open Outlook and perform a Send/Receive and then close Outlook? Or is there any third party software that would do this. Remember this is Outlook XP and the security is different. All you had to do was post back if you knew something. You don't have to be rude about it. Whether the user is awake or asleep is irrelevant all I needed to know is if you knew of anything. Maybe you don't know what a command switch is? I don't know. All I am looking for is
RE: Problems with default message in OOA
Leema, Use MS article Q223391, even though it refers to the reverse situation, it will work in correcting this problem. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: MSExchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 November 2002 18:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems with default message in OOA We are using Exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Windows 2000 Sp2. The Out of Office Assistant for one of our users will not send out the default message she supplies when she turns it on. Our IMS is configured to disallow OOA messages to the internet, but the message does not even get sent to people in our Exchange environment. If she turns on the OOA and anyone sends her a message for the first time since the OOA is turned on, the OOA reply is not sent back. I set up a rule within the OOA to reply to all messages with a specific template, turned on the OOA and sent a note to her from my account. I got the message configured in the OOA rule, but still didn't get the default message. I looked at article 297281 in the knowledge base, but that doesn't apply here (she doesn't have an alternate recipient enabled.) Has anyone seen this before? -- Leema Lallmamode Arizona State University _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: losts mails
Or if you don't want to add it as a second mailbox, just set off the web page view from properties. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 November 2002 12:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: losts mails Something else I have seen recently is that the presence of emails at the top level of the mailbox. The only way I know to find these is to log into the users mailbox asa secondary mailbox to your own. Then select his Mailbox listing in your Folder list view (the middle column). If you see some emails on the right hand side then the mystery is solved except how they got there in the first place. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Nikki Peterson Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 15:09 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: losts mails Yes, but assume that he has another machine at home that he VPN's in with, his Outlook at home is set to use OST, but no sync happens because it takes too long. Now he has worked with his OST at home, logged off, and didn't sync back up to the server. He gets to work, and none of his sent are in sent, none of his new mail is in the inbox... I'm bracedShoot Nikki OST settings wouldn't be at issue unless the user deleted the items while offline, and I think he might know he did that. OST synchronizes and doesn't move messages. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nikki Peterson Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: losts mails Check for OST sync settings (or could another machine be involved, then look for some messages in other OST), PST delivery (If more than one machine is involved), Auto Archive settings, Rule Wizard set to move, In options, Save my sent with the original...(not in Sent) Just off the top of my head... Nikki Check that a rule (client or server) didn't move or delete the messages. Check that a view isn't being applied that may filter the messages. Another test: Send a message to the user with an easily identifiable subject (like Andy and Shania in the server room) and then use the Advanced Find (Tools menu, Advanced Find) feature to locate it. Make sure you are searching from the top folder of the mailbox and that you are searching all subfolders. * * Erik Sojka, MOS, MCSE * * Asst. VP, Technology Services * * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * -Original Message- From: Albert Charron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: losts mails Hi all. I have a user complaining that he losts some of his e-mails from his Inbox if a lost email was a e-mail that he replied, he lost the copy from his sent items as well. I don't know how to track the problem. Any hints about this? Thank you. Albert Charron Trisotech Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination
RE: Stuck emails
Doug, Does the user have a Internet Email account setup on his Profile. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 November 2002 13:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Stuck emails I have a weird one for you. We have one user who's emails stick in his outbox. This is just for external emails. I thought it was because he is on a laptop and was having connection problems to the exchange server. That was not the case; I logged in as this user on our terminal server, and set up a new instance of outlook. This verified his account to the server, and yet any external email would sit in his outbox. None of the other 25 users are having this problem. The only other odd thing I can not is that there are 49 messages in the inbound messages awaiting delivery queue that I can't delete and don't show up in the insdatain folder. I am sure I haven't provided enough info, but would be happy to. Exchange 5.5ent on WinNT 4.0 sp6. Any help or pointers in the right directions would be appreciated. ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Keystone Petroleum Equipment, Ltd. 981 Trindle Road West Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 ^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^~-~^ Doug Kassay - Operations Specialist Phone 717-697-1651 Fax 717-697-8591 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: EDU Migration Question
Set the 'expiry time' parameter on the Email? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Fay, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 November 2002 18:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: EDU Migration Question I'm preparing a design to migrate campus students from Sendmail to E2K. One of the clients objectives is to achieve like functionality for the following task: To search for specific messages by subject and/or sender and delete them. The scenario being that Faculty or Network staff has sent out notices over some time period and students have been away for an extended period and not checked their mail. These messages have accumulated and the Network staff wants to remove these messages. Today this is performed on the Unix Host. And yes, mailbox size warnings and limits will be implemented. Can this same functionality be achieved on the Exchange Server without a 3rd party tool? I don't believe Mailbox Manager is a solution since it is based on age limits. My client does not want to delete unread messages older than xx days arbitrarily. Mark Fay [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.fay.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
Tony, Look at Q314917. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: 15 November 2002 16:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation Andy David, You just got a 1019 error! What are you going to do now? I'm calling PSS! -Original Message- From: Tony Nguyen [mailto:TNguyen;jetproducts.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Online Defragmentation I have just this on the Event Viewer. What should I do? Event ID: 184 Source: ESE97 Description: MSExchangeIS ((353) ) Online defragmentation of database 'D:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB' terminated prematurely after encountering unexpected error -1019. Everything is still working fine. I found some thing like this on technet, but it have the unexpected error -1018 Any info is helpful Thank Tony Nguyen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook drops first address in TO: line
Possibly, have you checked that it happens on this Outlook only, and if so have you checked if he has set 'use comma as the address separator'. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Jerry J. [mailto:jjones;telemanager.net] Sent: 13 November 2002 22:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook drops first address in TO: line Have a user that when he types in more than 2 addresses in the TO: line it drops the first address. Did a test that had 4 seperate addresses that all come to me. The first address did disappear and the e-mail never arrived to that mailbox. This only happens with multiple addresses. If he sends an e-mail to that first mailbox alone it arrives fine. So not matter what the first address is, when 3 or more addresses are present the 1st one gets dropped every time. Anyone seen this before? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Domain Trusts and Exchange Accounts
Erik, Yes, we have that setup here. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Erik Vesneski [mailto:erik;epicentric.com] Sent: 14 November 2002 14:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Domain Trusts and Exchange Accounts Hi, If you have two domains and they fully trust each other can an NT account in domain a be mapped to an exchange account in domain b? Regards, Erik L. Vesneski Director - Information Technology www.epicentric.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
How long do you reckon before one of these companies due an AV company from block their 'legal' (choke) SPAM, as the spy ware companies did! Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:jacob.busby;hants.gov.uk] Sent: 13 November 2002 12:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up It clearly isn't a virus, but it might not be stretching things too much to call it a worm. It's really the delivery method that's different, along with the attempt to make it vaguely legal. But there's a big difference between legal and ethical. Personally I'd just block the users looking the the affected URLs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus heads up
due (dodgy finder here) I meant SUE -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:Paul.Hurst;eu.sony.com] Sent: 13 November 2002 13:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up How long do you reckon before one of these companies due an AV company from block their 'legal' (choke) SPAM, as the spy ware companies did! Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:jacob.busby;hants.gov.uk] Sent: 13 November 2002 12:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus heads up It clearly isn't a virus, but it might not be stretching things too much to call it a worm. It's really the delivery method that's different, along with the attempt to make it vaguely legal. But there's a big difference between legal and ethical. Personally I'd just block the users looking the the affected URLs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: No more free/busy data?
Korff, By design the free and busy only show complete months at a time it does not roll forward on each day (IE if you have three months it will only show to the end of the month). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: 13 November 2002 13:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Well that was the first place I looked. Mine is set to 2 months, surely. However, I am one of the few individuals who has free/busy data available until the end of time (sometime in 4051 apparently). Why am I an exception (and no, I'm not making the appointment to check this)? There are other exceptions too but their free/busy is set to two months also. Why the discrepancy? Is it always the 1st of the month? I would have guessed that if today were the 13th (and so it is!) that free/busy data would be available until Jan 13, 2003. Is there any way to effect a corporate policy on this enforce it? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:nate.couch;eds.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 07:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: No more free/busy data? Check their settings under Tools - Options - Calendar Options - Free/Busy Options. -Original Message- From: Yanek Korff [mailto:yanek;cigital.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: No more free/busy data? I noticed something odd today and I'm wondering why this is the case. When a user goes into their calendar and tries to set an appointment for anytime after Jan 1, 2003, the calendar displays No Information. Starting exactly on Jan 1, 2003. Mind you there are exceptions... SOME users have regular grey squares ad infinitum. What's going on here? -Yanek. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
Ed, JFYI It would seem in the EU that soon it might be a legal requirement for companies to retain email forever, to stop the old 'well we have a policy that says deleted old emails so you can't sue us for a dodgy email' excuse. A whole new meaning to point 2 for us. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: 07 November 2002 19:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' I have a few reasons that an archival system might not be appropriate. 1. Cost. 2. Retention policies. These systems are in opposition to many companies' legal departments' opinions that all e-mail older than a certain age must be destroyed. I'm not arguing that these policies are valid (I think they almost always are wrong-headed) but that they exist and have to be followed when so dictated by corporate management. 3. Need. Plenty of organizations simply don't need them. Enlightened database sizing and retention policies can obviate such a requirement in many cases. Myself, I would prefer spending funds on improved backup systems rather than an archival system if each achieves the same end goal of allowing users to store more data. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' I have ony found one solution to this type of problem and it is called an Email Archival system. I have no idea why this type of a solution is not more popular. It gets the information out of the Exchange stores and off user's hard drives and onto permanent storage on CD's or DVD's. The systems they have now integrate quite well with Exchange, provide advanced security capabilities and include full-text searching capabilities. And users can access the systems via a web browser. Why more people do not use these systems is anyone's guess. Apparently most email admins out there are content with draconian storage policies or catering to users like poor Russell who is personally buring CD's. It can all be automated and you can have the best of all worlds. Email Archival systems folks, they have been around for a long time and work quite well. I recommend them to nearly every client that I work for because there is so much business knowledge in email that it is almost criminal the way some companies blast it from their systems after only a week or two. If they actually understood and appreciated the amount of knowledge and business process information that they were losing, they would never do such an incredibly stupid thing. And Craig, I have to disagree with you about user provided storage. Individuals have consistently proven that they simply cannot store, organize and process large amounts of data. If I received as much snail mail as email, my entire house would be full of unorganized stacks of crap. Proper storage of business information should reside on business systems, not on personally provided storage. Centralization and automation of storage is incredibly more efficient and productive than individual users storing their own information. Tongue out of cheek - this is a product design problem of course. Give me one good reason for Exchange being in the storage or data management business. How it ought to work in a world with Active Directories and Distributed File System overlays to NTFS is that a mailbox should be a pointer to user provided storage. Who provides your snail mail box? It's not the post office, unless you are renting a PO Box. Normal delivery is to storage that you provide, structure and manage. Why does Exchange deliver primarily to message stores? Because of a lack of sufficient protocols and customer demand to do it right. If your customer thinks your service is inadequate, your customer is not wrong. As someone earlier in this thread said so eloquently (if misguidedly) duh! -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:retts;harman.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 8:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' Hi there I have the same issue here. People have PST files that are well over a gig, and we had one person go over the 2 gig limit. No matter what we tell them, they insist that they need a mailbox over a gig. I limit them to a max of 300 megs, no matter how much crying they do. I just don't know what to do. I have told people once their PSTs hit 600 megs, then I'll transfer it to my machine and burn them a CD rom. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 6:56 AM
RE: Outlook Issue
Yes, When the original email placed into the PST didn't originate from Exchange email address system. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:John.Bowles;celera.com] Sent: 07 November 2002 19:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook Issue All, Has anyone seen that when a use replies to a message from a personal folder that the message hangs in the Outbox? If anyone has any insight on how they resolved this problem please let me know. Backend: Using E2K SP3 Client: Outlook 2K Thank you, __ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Default sender in Public Folder posts
Roger, I assume you are refering to send to unique emails addresses, as the PF 'folder assistant' will allow you to reply/forward or reply with template. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: 08 November 2002 12:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Default sender in Public Folder posts Public folders, with the exception of those with scripts associated to them, never send mail - they only receive. The Exchange model is that the primary mailbox is the default sending address, unless specifically told otherwise (through the from: field). I believe it is possible to do what you want to do with a custom form in the public folder, but I've not even looked at that stuff in years. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Sean Winters [mailto:sean.winters;ibertech.com] Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Default sender in Public Folder posts We have a SMTP address associated with a public folder - no big deal. The thing is, we need for replies generated from posts to this folder to have a pre-set From: field of the actual SMTP address of the Public Folder. I know that users can manually change the From field but is there (easy) way to make this automagic? Thanks! Sean _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using a PST for 'overflow'
If you do think of going KVault, wait till V4 (with offline vault is available as it's only in beta at the moment). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:Andy.Webb;swinc.com] Sent: 06 November 2002 16:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' I think you'd benefit more from something like kvault that moved the data out to nearline or offline storage, but left it within the Exchange environment. It will result in far less usage of drive space, is easily backed up and will result in fewer support calls. There are several Exchange Archiving products out there. None are particularly cheap, but then what's the total organizational cost of how you're managing it today? IT is supposed to be a facilitator of whatever the business does to make money. In general individual users do not have the skill or regimentation to be their own librarians. That's why in many large companies there is one, though not in nearly enough companies. IT should be helping the users apply the data retention, categorization, and retrievability policies defined by the librarian. Any mucking about with mailbox limits is a treatment of a symptom, not the root causes. I do understand that servers must be maintained at a recoverable level as defined by formal or informal SLA's. I just don't believe that pushing data that people deem valuable into unrecoverable and widely dispersed storage media is the right way to maintain the SLA. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 === ---Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] Posted At: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 8:26 AM Posted To: Microsoft Exchange Conversation: Using a PST for 'overflow' Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' We've been forced into restricting mailboxes as everyones being moved to a central server. Most users are having no problems getting their mailboxes down to 25-50mb, some much lower, a handful much higher. I'm finding it easiest to set some limits on the IS, then override that on individual mailboxes, as required, the MD for instance has a 500mb mailbox, after 2 CD's worth of archiving :-O What I've been saying to users is delete everything you can, anything older than 2 months that you need to keep put into a subfolder, then I go round and export these folders to PSTs, and dump them in their user folders on their local file servers, meaning they're included in the backups on their local servers, but the backup and disk space burden is removed from the Exchange server. I test the PSTs before deleting the originals, but I've seen nothing bigger than about 4-500mb. With enforced limits user will have to keep things in order, and we'll have to look at ongoing archiving in the method described above. 99% aren't aware of PST's, which is probably a good thing, though its added to my workload -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] Sent: 06 November 2002 13:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' I do. They don't know they can save them up on their home folder. They know I don't back up the workstations, but most think that you only can save PSTs on local drives ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 07:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' Why the hard line approach? I never said I made the backup of the PST, that's why one has a facilities department...I also didn't say that I found that mail particularly important, the user wants to keep it, so why not let him/her? They know not to come to me regarding items in PST files. Give the user a bit of slack here David. Sander -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:discussions;entrysecurity.com] Sent: 06 November 2002 01:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' No, just inform them of the 'No PST Backup' policy. I don't back up PSTs. Period. Either its in their mailbox or it is not that important. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sander Van Butzelaar Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 05:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using a PST for 'overflow' I have a couple of users who do the same thing. They don't want to delete old mail (for whatever reason) and I can't keep extending their mailbox sizes. So they move to PST. Be aware of the risks here! Make a periodic backup of that PST as hard drives are prone to failure. Sander -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange
RE: Distribution List
Someone has set the 'hide from address book' setting on the DL? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:Thomas.Smith;pittsburgh.af.mil] Sent: 06 November 2002 18:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Distribution List I have some users who can't see inside a distrbution list. When they are in outlook and go to the distrbution list, they can se the list ,but not the people in them. any ideas thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Offline Address Book Sync Failure.
Luke, You haven't mentioned it but have you looked at Q179346 to see if it solves your problem? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 1:59 AM Subject: Offline Address Book Sync Failure. The problem as it stands now is that our Exchange Server cant generate an offline address book for the GAL and our users cant download the address book to their laptops. This is an MSX 5.5 server and is the only one servicing this site. The workstations are a mixture of Windows based OS and Outlook clients, whilst the server is NT4 SP6a. I have already tried the steps in MS Knowledgebase articles Q235898 and Q243155 but nothing mentioned in there made any difference to our situation. The exact sequence of events is: Client tries to download address book from Outlook 97, 98 or 2000. They recieve the error An error occurred while opening the Microsoft Exchange offline address book files on the Microsoft Exchange Server. See your administrator. This is then followed by the error Unable to download the Offline Address Book. The Microsoft Exchange Address Book could not be accessed. From the client point of view, thats where things stop. In accordance with one of the mentioned articles, I then try to create a new offline address book, selecting only the tiniest of recipients containers (at one stage we created a brand new container for testing, of course we have also tested the entire GAL). When I hit GENERATE ALL, the process fails stating: An error occurred while generating the offline Address Book. To view details, see the application event log in the Windows NT Event Viewer on the offline Address Book Server. Microsoft Exchange Administrator ID no. c1031662 Checking the Event Log reveals Event ID: 5004 Description: Generation of the offline Address Book is complete. Result: An error occurred. Another article describes putting OAB Version 2 and Offline Address Book in the folders on this information store list. We have checked the instances and both of these folders are located on the Public Information Store of the server. We have experienced a similar situation previously, but it was in a multiple server exchange site. I believe the resolution there was the total removal of Offline Address Book and then re-installing it. (I THINK that was the solution anyway). Can anyone shed some light on what might be causing this and more importantly, what will fix it? Many thanks, Luke _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Offline Address Book Sync Failure.
Does the event log on the server confirm that the offline generation has completed OK? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:msxmailinglist;ena.com.au] Sent: 29 October 2002 06:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Offline Address Book Sync Failure. The problem as it stands now is that our Exchange Server cant generate an offline address book for the GAL and our users cant download the address book to their laptops. This is an MSX 5.5 server and is the only one servicing this site. The workstations are a mixture of Windows based OS and Outlook clients, whilst the server is NT4 SP6a. I have already tried the steps in MS Knowledgebase articles Q235898 and Q243155 but nothing mentioned in there made any difference to our situation. The exact sequence of events is: Client tries to download address book from Outlook 97, 98 or 2000. They recieve the error An error occurred while opening the Microsoft Exchange offline address book files on the Microsoft Exchange Server. See your administrator. This is then followed by the error Unable to download the Offline Address Book. The Microsoft Exchange Address Book could not be accessed. From the client point of view, thats where things stop. In accordance with one of the mentioned articles, I then try to create a new offline address book, selecting only the tiniest of recipients containers (at one stage we created a brand new container for testing, of course we have also tested the entire GAL). When I hit GENERATE ALL, the process fails stating: An error occurred while generating the offline Address Book. To view details, see the application event log in the Windows NT Event Viewer on the offline Address Book Server. Microsoft Exchange Administrator ID no. c1031662 Checking the Event Log reveals Event ID: 5004 Description: Generation of the offline Address Book is complete. Result: An error occurred. Another article describes putting OAB Version 2 and Offline Address Book in the folders on this information store list. We have checked the instances and both of these folders are located on the Public Information Store of the server. We have experienced a similar situation previously, but it was in a multiple server exchange site. I believe the resolution there was the total removal of Offline Address Book and then re-installing it. (I THINK that was the solution anyway). Can anyone shed some light on what might be causing this and more importantly, what will fix it? Many thanks, Luke _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Viewing labels on a calendar in a Public Folder
I think you find that colouring of apps only came in on OL2002 (doesn't always work). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: William E. Grever [mailto:wgrever;crcm.med.wayne.edu] Sent: 28 October 2002 19:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Viewing labels on a calendar in a Public Folder Greetings All, We have a moderated Public Folder containing a Calendar for scheduling departmental employee vacation time. The Moderator has set up custom-defined labels such as green for Lisa and yellow for Tim etc., (it's a small department). The color coding shows up fine on the moderator's workstation in Outlook 2002, and the custom label definitions are available for everyone to choose from. However, the actual color coding/labeling is not seen by other viewers of the Calendar in the Public Folder. Is there a way to set the labels so all viewers of the public folder calendar will automatically see the colored labels? Exchange 5.5 SP3, most clients are OL 2000, or OL 2002. Thanks, Will Grever _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing Mail Servers
Vincent, Actually we have two different domains in one of our Exchange sites and we can 'move mailbox' OK (there is a trust though between the two) between the servers. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:avallone;ibiquity.com] Sent: 22 October 2002 18:10 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Is it safe to assume that you are unable to move mailboxes from one Exchange server in one domain to another Exchange box in a different domain? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers You need not do anything for that to work, but it works only for Outlook with MAPI, and only when you move mailboxes using the Admin or System Manager tools, not Exmerge. POP3, IMAP4 or OWA won't automatically update profiles. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Vincent Avallone Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Do I have to DO anything for that to work? It doesn't seem to work. Do I have to disable the old account? Should I reread Ed's method? My original server is using Associated Accounts to the new domain. -Original Message- From: Chris King [mailto:Cking;whitneyhawks.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers As long as the original server is still online it should tell the client that the mailbox is now homed on the other server, and the client's profile will be updated accordingly. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-311248;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Vincent Avallone Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers The new server is on another domain. 2. Bring up a new Windows 2000 server in the same AD domain as the existing server. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers If you followed Ed's Method it will. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:avallone;ibiquity.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Really? I don't think 2000 will change the profile on the fly. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:Dale.Edwards;AmericanTower.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers I think Exchange is intuitive enough to change the servername automagically, if you are talking about changing it in the profile for the User on their machines. At least Exchange 5.5 was intuitive enough to know that if I moved Users from Server A to Server B, the User did not have to do anything. The servername in the profile got changed on the fly. If I am way off the actual topic, I apologize. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Changing Mail Servers Just thought of this one. If you moved people from one server to another then you will most likely have to touch each workstation. - Original Message - From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:07 PM Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Yes I can what? How should I change the name? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Changing Mail Servers Yes you can. As long as all your workstations are the same. But you should have done it so it would have been transparent to the users. - Original Message - From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:49 AM Subject: Changing Mail Servers Thanks to all your help, my new Exchange 2000 email server is up and running pretty smoothly so far. When it is time to go live, what are your suggestion on how to change the server name on my clients? I thought there may be a registry entry that I can use regini with and change it, but I haven't been able to find it yet. There is the option of asking users to do it themselves. I am trying to avoid visiting each user. Any ideas would be helpful. Thanks -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Public Folder Anti-Delete Permission
Chris, The reference is too multi-site PF's that have PF's from different sites owning the different sub-folders as the PF tree grows. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:chris_scharff;messageone.com] Sent: 22 October 2002 23:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Anti-Delete Permission Hmm.. I've never had that problem. How does one get that problem? Looks like a lot of Exchange admins are having similar problems with users deleting folders. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automated PF...
James, Set the IMS to block the PF from allowing to send external? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt;bhi-erc.com] Sent: 21 October 2002 22:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automated PF... I think I have slightly different problem than I have seen here before: 1. Exchange 5.5 SP4, running on a Win2k SP2 server, in an NT 4.0 domain. 2. Created a PF for our internal users, so that they could drag and drop their SPAM into, for further perusal by me, for blocking purposes. 3. Wanted to be polite and let them know (after dragging and dropping an item to the folder), that their contribution had been received. I set up the rule on the PF to fire off for every e-mail dragged into the folder. 4. It has had one unfortunate side effect. When dragging and dropping into the folder, the rule looks at the From... address and fires off to that address...exactly what I DON'T want it doing, because it fires off to the spammer. But as with most users, the process of copying and pasting Internet Headers into a new e-mail and sending to this folder is too difficult or time consuming for them. :::sheesh!::: And of course, forwarding the e-mail to the PF wipes out all the Internet Header info. So... Q1: I know this sounds stupid, but is there any way to get the rule to fire off to the inbox of the person that is actually doing the dragging and dropping? Q2: If not, does anyone know of a solution to my problem, short of delete and forget? I'd like to purchase a copy of SurfControl, but the $60k pricetag was a little spendy for my boss, even at a government site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shutting Down 5.5
Chris, This was used in the old versions of 5.5 (I think before SP3) as Exchange did not shut down in the correct order when requested by NT and therefore took a loo time (E.G. tried to shutdown the services in the wrong order and hence some at the same time, etc; until it got to IS which would shutdown, then it went round in the top and did the same thing again and again until it finally shut everything down). Now we have SP3 it is not necessary. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 October 2002 19:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shutting Down 5.5 I have seen arguments both ways and am interested in the list's perspective. My predecessor here has it drilled into everyone that you have to use his batch script to stop Exchange services in a certain order. I know the info store stopping cleanly is the biggest one you want. Has anyone seen or use something like this to shut down the services in a certain order vs. letting NT take them down in the dependency order upon shutdown? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Shutting Down 5.5
Daniel, How come then you could shutdown a server quicker by specifying the shutdown order of the services in a batch file (as requested here) then shutting down SA? if that was the case then the batch file would make no difference. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 15 October 2002 14:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shutting Down 5.5 That was not the cause of the shutdown; the dependencies make sure of the correct order. It had to do with the IS and how it was flushing buffers which was addressed, finally, in SP3. -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 2:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Shutting Down 5.5 Chris, This was used in the old versions of 5.5 (I think before SP3) as Exchange did not shut down in the correct order when requested by NT and therefore took a loo time (E.G. tried to shutdown the services in the wrong order and hence some at the same time, etc; until it got to IS which would shutdown, then it went round in the top and did the same thing again and again until it finally shut everything down). Now we have SP3 it is not necessary. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 October 2002 19:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Shutting Down 5.5 I have seen arguments both ways and am interested in the list's perspective. My predecessor here has it drilled into everyone that you have to use his batch script to stop Exchange services in a certain order. I know the info store stopping cleanly is the biggest one you want. Has anyone seen or use something like this to shut down the services in a certain order vs. letting NT take them down in the dependency order upon shutdown? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DAT FILES IN EXCHANGE 5.5.
Daniel, You're a card ;-). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net] Sent: 10 October 2002 16:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DAT FILES IN EXCHANGE 5.5. Sure, go right ahead. -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:Thomas.Smith;pittsburgh.af.mil] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DAT FILES IN EXCHANGE 5.5. Hi Can the .dat files in the MTA folder be deleted? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2
Russell, That's probably the problem they had (Group + Web)Shield, but they weren't going to let us know that ;-) Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 October 2002 17:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Hi there There are two issues that we ran into with Webshield: 1) Webshield would suddenly hold all of our emails and corrupt them. When we called NAI they said they don't recommend install groupshield and webshield on the same server. 2) Out of the box, Webshield is set to relay. The only way I figured this out was to stop webshield and then have my servers checked by all the anti spam companies (ORDB.org, etc). After calling NAI and really hammering the tech on the other line, he finally admitted that the product does relay. In the setup manual, there is a section that explains how to set webshield to accept mail from servers within your company. However, the instructions tell you it is not really necessary to do this. The instructions lie. The tech told me the instructions are not clear. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: Jason Rader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Couldn't figure out what caused 2 of our Exchange servers to crash until reading this thread. We are about to install Webshield though. What problems have you experienced? Thanks, Jason From: Etts, Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:40:43 -0400 We're using Groupshield here with no issues. Webshield, however uugghhh Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 3:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 We use McAfee for the desktop/server file coverage, and yes ePO does make the firewall/anti-virus control so much easier. But for Exchange, Trend is our favorite no problems since I've been here unlike some of our sister divisions who have had fun with Groupshield :-). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Jeremy I. Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 October 2002 21:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 I haven't had any problems with Groupshield either. Maybe not because it is great, but the fact that it gives you the ability to use the Blackstone list - which has protected us from every virus that has come up lately. I love Epolicy and would recommend it to anyone. Centralized, hierarchical control of all of you virus apps, saves me hours every week and every outbreak. -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Here is a MS KB article on it: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;q319011; -Mike -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Elaborate: I called McAfee about the product once for help with a problem, they charged us for the help then transferred us. The next guy that came on the phone said that the product was no longer supported. We had tons of problems with it, service was always stopping, updates we slow coming when compared to other products, tons of technical problem. we dumped it. We are running Symantec no, no problems. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 Can someone elaborate? We've been using it for 2 years and never had any problems. We're about to renew our subscription (not sure if we did already), as well as installing the management console (they call it e-policy orchestrator nowadays..) on a new server If it's so crap, we'll consider switching... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 October 2002 8:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 That will eventually change. They you will come back to the good side. -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: McAfee GroupShield 5.2 We use McAfee throughout... Never had any problems (apart from constantly trying to remember if it's called McAffee or McAfee or McAffe).. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2002 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions
RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox
Fiona, Don't go for the Veritas IDR solution. I have just installed it and we are using it because it given to us by Veritas with netbackup. All it does is an automated Windows NT/2000 MS install and at the end runs a GUI program to do a restore. A total waste of time to install a OS (about a hour or so) just to have it overwritten with the restore. There new replaement software they have just bought off another compkany called 'bare metal restore' seems to be a MUCH MUCH better product. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Glenn Corbett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 October 2002 12:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Fioon, call you Veritas representative and ask for an evaluation copy of the IDR (strange that there isnt an eval version, they have evals of all the other options). I've used both, and the Veritas solution is superior in every way to Arcserve (at least once CA got hold of it). Glenn - Original Message - From: Fioon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:57 PM Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Hi Ed Crowley, You've got so much experience, would you like to have a few comment on ArcServe Veritas ? I've tested on the ArcServe 's DR on a testing server,it's work fine. Would like to test on Veritas, but unfortunately they dont provided any DR evaluation copy, so i can't evaluate on that. I wonder how good is Veritas's IDR. I've heared so many bad comments of ArcServe here, which make me confuse . .. worry. Now i'm can only test on the Veritas Normal Backup. Your advice is highly appreciately Thanks Fion -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox BLB = Brick Level Backup, or backup of individual mailboxes. SMR = I am guessing that this is Single Mailbox Restore. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fioon Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 9:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Hei, Recently have interested in Veritas, but quite new. May i know what is BLB SMR guys referring to ? Thanks -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 1:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Thank you very much. Fortunately, I'm not using BLB. I'll proceed with my SMR. If I can't get it back through agents tab, I'll try the decoder and/or mdbvue . I'll let you know how I made out. Thanks again, Louise -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 5:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox It's been quite a while when I was playing with this stuff and I remember that it is not trivial. Let's see what I can remember... The Exchange 5.5 Scripting agent script itself is stored as a hidden item in the folder it is applied to (in your case: the particular mailbox on Server A). Another second config item, also hidden, is created on the server the script is supposed to be executed (in your case Server B) in the system folder Event_Config (or similar - can't remember the correct name unfortunately). So, if you just want to get the script code back then try to restore the whole mailbox store on a recovery server [1] and use either a debugging tool [2] or try to connect with Outlook and see if you can get it via the Agents tab. [1] Note that if you use BLB [3] you might not be able to restore Scripting Agents. Only if you use an Exchange backup aware product to do a full IS backup/restore you have a chance. [2] Either MicroEye ScriptDorector (http://www.microeye.com/scriptdirector) or the Microsoft Agent Editor (used to be in the Exchange 5.5 SDK or BackOffice Resource Kit 4.5) or plain mdbvu32.exe (comes with Exchange on the setup CD). But the latter needs to be used CAREFULLY. [3] BLB = Brick Level Backup like it is offered with ArcServe, Veritas and other backup software. Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 8:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recovering an Event Script from a Mailbox Hi all, I'm hoping you can assist me in just how to recover an event script that is associated with a particular mailbox. It seems the script just disappeared and the developer did not have a copy. The mailbox sits on server A and the script was
RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
No from Veritas it's their enterprise product. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2002 02:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Are u saying Netbackup from CA ? -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 10:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Try Netbackup works on Unix or NT. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2002 03:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backing up Exchange 5.5 I was exposed recently to TSM Tivoli. I did about a 20-30 plus restores half of those from scratch. Nothing but net. Pardon the pun. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 6:36 AM Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Try HP OmniBack II. Don't know the price but works just great. -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 It's BrightStor , same under CA .. Is ArcServe 2000 really that bad ? I've just tried, and it turned out not too bad. On the middle of discussing want to purchase or not !! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Brightwhore? Same crap. New name. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fioon Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 I've download the BE trial copy , but it can't run. Funny, hang on Self Extract. Download again, same thing happened again. Any opinion on new ArcServe2000 BrightStore for the Disaster Recovery on Exchange 5.5 Issue ? Fin -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Yes, as a google search would have shown. - Original Message - From: Fioon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:09 AM Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Hi, May i know which third party are you guys talking about on this Backup Exec ? It's Veritas ?? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5
Try Netbackup works on Unix or NT. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 October 2002 03:33 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backing up Exchange 5.5 I was exposed recently to TSM Tivoli. I did about a 20-30 plus restores half of those from scratch. Nothing but net. Pardon the pun. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 6:36 AM Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Try HP OmniBack II. Don't know the price but works just great. -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 9:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 It's BrightStor , same under CA .. Is ArcServe 2000 really that bad ? I've just tried, and it turned out not too bad. On the middle of discussing want to purchase or not !! -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Brightwhore? Same crap. New name. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fioon Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 I've download the BE trial copy , but it can't run. Funny, hang on Self Extract. Download again, same thing happened again. Any opinion on new ArcServe2000 BrightStore for the Disaster Recovery on Exchange 5.5 Issue ? Fin -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Yes, as a google search would have shown. - Original Message - From: Fioon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:09 AM Subject: RE: Backing up Exchange 5.5 Hi, May i know which third party are you guys talking about on this Backup Exec ? It's Veritas ?? Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New Exchange Server
Andrea, I do believe though he said that... 'I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. ' IE he had it on Raid 1 and it still failed (don't know why probably because of a problem with the Raid1 hardware/BIOS or it was the ID0 drive in the mirror? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Andrea Coppini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 15:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Picture this: Your single (let's say IDE) pagefile drive fails, so your system crashes. You run down to your store or computer shop to buy a new drive (system still down) You install the disk in another machine (since Exchange might not start up without page drive) (system still down) You partition/format the drive (system still down) You install the new IDE disk in your exchange server (system still down) You start up Exchange. If you can afford all that downtime, go ahead and use a single drive. But now let's look at RAID1 swap: One of your swap disks fail.. Raid1 is broken so machine keeps running on one disk You take the bad disk Offline and pull it out You stroll and whistle your way down to your store or computer shop to get a new disk, maybe even have a couple of doughnuts on the way... You insert the new disk in your exchange server. run the RAID tools, rebuild the RAID. Pat yourself on the back for 0% downtime. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server If it happened once it will probably happen again. I see no big benefit of putting page file on RAID. If I had a limited number of drive bays, I would rather have a separate RAID1 for transaction logs and a separate RAID5 for informations store database files; and if no more drive array bays are available for the page file volume - I would stick an IDE or SCSI drive in the CD-ROM bay or some other available space and connect it to the onboard controller and achieve better performance instead of perceived reliability. -Original Message- From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 9:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server So because you once had a problem with RAID that caused it to stop working must mean that it's always unreliable for everyone else every time? Robert Moir IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue 0 0 rows returned -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2002 13:53 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Do you need me to explain it all in small details? I had an Exchange server. Page file was on a separate RAID1 volume. RAID1 broke. Server crashed with a blue screen. Having the page file on RAID1 did not necessarily make it more reliable. Might as well have had the page file on a single drive. Why did I write this? Because I was answering someone else's remark Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. Ok now? Can I go? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What does that have to do with Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Well once I had a broken RAID1 on the page file volume. RAID did not save me. The server blue-screened. The RAID1 was physical. How about that for reliability? -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 7:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server Why? Placing the pagefile on a separate drive sacrifices reliability for performance. This is not normally a choice I would make on a production server. Dennis Depp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server I would still try to find a way to put page file on a separate drive. Check if you can get a single IDE or SCSI drive and stick it somewhere inside the server. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New Exchange Server What's vitally important is to keep the logs on a
RE: IS 70GB and growing....
Mark, It also depends on your SIS ration at the moment, if it's 1:1 then there will be no SIS to break (unlikely though). You would have to run the report on your database to know though. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2002 21:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Hi. I think I am missing something. As far as I understand, if I install second exchange server in the site, I will get a new priv.edb. If I move mailbox to that server, I will loose SIS between servers. So, if a message is sent to 4 mailbox's on one server, and 9 mailboxes on second server, I will have 2 instance of the same message. Am I right? Thanks! - Original Message - From: Couch, Nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 1:55 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I vote for two servers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Great Cthulhu Jones Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 20:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Who cares about it, though? If you need two servers, you need two servers. If not, buy more hard drives. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing If I recall correctly, using the Move Mailbox utility retains SIS. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 30 September 2002 6:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IS 70GB and growing Hi guys. I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The IS is over 73GB (total of 500 users). I am thinking whether it is the right move to split this box into two servers. The main problem is that I will loose SIS... On the other hand, I will have two smaller databases. I am sure some of you had this scenario in the past. I would like to hear your opinions. In case it is important, the IS is going to be moved to EMC box in 3 months (part of storage project). I am mostly intersted hearing from happy users with such big IS (are there?!) Thanks! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doubles of all Outlookfolders
Allison, When Exmerging you should use the PC with the version of Outlook of that language (here we have to use Japanese Outlook). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 10:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Doubles of all Outlookfolders Hello, So I used Exmerge exported all of my user's data and re-imported them on the new server. Worked fine. Except... I went to my users' PCs and opened their Outlooks (v2000) and tested that everything was OK (I only have 8 users so this wasn't a big deal, and I needed to set a registery key on their machines anyway). There was however 1 laptop user who had his machine at home, so I couldn't login to his machine and test his mailbox. So, I opened it on a workstation (running Office 2000 English version), saw everything was OK, and logged out. I didn't notice double objects, though. This morning he says he has doubles of all of the Outlook folders: contacts, calendar, notes, etc. One has the English name and the other is the German name. All new emails are going in the Inbox (and not into the Posteingang were all of the old mails are), and users trying to read his Kalender see only his Calendar, which of course, is empty. How do I fix it? Can he safely copy the old data into the English folders and then delete the German ones? Thankfully the user does not care which language the folders display. Both Exchange servers are Exchange 2000 (German) Client is Outlook 2000 (German) with Windows 98 (German) Regards, Allison Wittstock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doubles of all Outlookfolders
P.S. the calendars that has been newly created is NOT the same as the original one in Outlook (you will be able to delete the new one whilst in Outlook you will NOT be able to delete the German one) , so I would keep his German Calendar/tasks and journal folders as these have 'special' connection with automated procedures in Outlook (like appointment notifications, etc;). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 11:31 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Doubles of all Outlookfolders Allison, When Exmerging you should use the PC with the version of Outlook of that language (here we have to use Japanese Outlook). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 10:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Doubles of all Outlookfolders Hello, So I used Exmerge exported all of my user's data and re-imported them on the new server. Worked fine. Except... I went to my users' PCs and opened their Outlooks (v2000) and tested that everything was OK (I only have 8 users so this wasn't a big deal, and I needed to set a registery key on their machines anyway). There was however 1 laptop user who had his machine at home, so I couldn't login to his machine and test his mailbox. So, I opened it on a workstation (running Office 2000 English version), saw everything was OK, and logged out. I didn't notice double objects, though. This morning he says he has doubles of all of the Outlook folders: contacts, calendar, notes, etc. One has the English name and the other is the German name. All new emails are going in the Inbox (and not into the Posteingang were all of the old mails are), and users trying to read his Kalender see only his Calendar, which of course, is empty. How do I fix it? Can he safely copy the old data into the English folders and then delete the German ones? Thankfully the user does not care which language the folders display. Both Exchange servers are Exchange 2000 (German) Client is Outlook 2000 (German) with Windows 98 (German) Regards, Allison Wittstock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Doubles of all Outlookfolders
Allison, Looks like you have it the other way round then he uses an English client (IE you should use the same exmerge client as the user, in this case English) and that's why you can't delete the English but you can delete the German version. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 12:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Doubles of all Outlookfolders Hallo Paul, The 2 machines that I used Exmerge on were both German. It was the Outlook client that was in English -- I just wanted to open his mailbox to verify that #1 he could login and #2 his data was there. Allison On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, you wrote: Allison, When Exmerging you should use the PC with the version of Outlook of that language (here we have to use Japanese Outlook). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 September 2002 10:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Doubles of all Outlookfolders Hello, So I used Exmerge exported all of my user's data and re-imported them on the new server. Worked fine. Except... I went to my users' PCs and opened their Outlooks (v2000) and tested that everything was OK (I only have 8 users so this wasn't a big deal, and I needed to set a registery key on their machines anyway). There was however 1 laptop user who had his machine at home, so I couldn't login to his machine and test his mailbox. So, I opened it on a workstation (running Office 2000 English version), saw everything was OK, and logged out. I didn't notice double objects, though. This morning he says he has doubles of all of the Outlook folders: contacts, calendar, notes, etc. One has the English name and the other is the German name. All new emails are going in the Inbox (and not into the Posteingang were all of the old mails are), and users trying to read his Kalender see only his Calendar, which of course, is empty. How do I fix it? Can he safely copy the old data into the English folders and then delete the German ones? Thankfully the user does not care which language the folders display. Both Exchange servers are Exchange 2000 (German) Client is Outlook 2000 (German) with Windows 98 (German) Regards, Allison Wittstock _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (6) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Are Deleted Items Logged?..etc
Ed, Are you repeating yourself again ;-) (that's 4 I've counted) or are you just getting your own back on the people that post there question more than once!! Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 September 2002 06:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Are Deleted Items Logged?..etc Of course it is logged in the transaction log, but I know of no way to make any use of that fact. Edgar J. Crowley Jr. Technical Consultant Windows Messaging Platforms Practice hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 7:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Are Deleted Items Logged?..etc Q: When a user delete's items in OL/Exch does the Exchange system log this action? Does it log that fact that a user would then empty the deleted items? Does it log the fact that the items where recovered from the retention? What log's might I look at for this info? Exch55sp4 NT4sp6a Yes..issue in management... thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (05) ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: *groan* PST Files
Jon, IMHO Don't go down that route, before I joined here they went for that, now we have uses that get corrupt PST's because they are knocking around the 1.84GB limit, they make copies of the PST (one for March, then another in June with 10% more email). All it does is move the problem of space onto either a non-secure desktop/laptop or fill up a file server. I would just make sure that the server is of reasonable spec and KEEP it on exchange where it belongs (since you have no money to archive it). ALSO see FAQ why PST=BAD. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Exchange.ListServe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 September 2002 10:02 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: *groan* PST Files Hi. Standard Version of EX5.5, SP4. 200+ users. We are looking at educating users in not storing everything in their email, but storing in either a .pst or .ost. Money is an issue, my company won't pay for us to upgrade to 5.5 Enterprise or Exchange 2K, so there's no option IMO other than educate the packrats, and set up an archiving solution. I've also read the arguments in the FAQ, but wonder what other folks in a similar situation would do, with regard to archiving. Currently our priv.edb is 13.9 GB, while the pub.edb is 226MB, so would archiving essential emails on Public folders be a reasonable idea? Some of our client handlers need to keep archives for some of our clients, in case of compliance issues. Jon * DISCLAIMER Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the Company. This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. It may contain material protected by attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the IT department by telephone on +44 (0)117 311 8555 or via email to [EMAIL PROTECTED], including a copy of this message. Please then delete this email and destroy any copies of it. * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Chaos
You might also want to set folder visible tick box off under contributor (if the emails are confidential). Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Leo Ballester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 September 2002 19:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Chaos You have to set default as contributor... -Original Message- From: McCready, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Chaos Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT 4.0 SP6a. OK. I have several Public Folders setup which people are having a problem sending E-mail to. Here is the error message I am receiving. The message could not be delivered because you do not have create permissions on this folder or it is only available to folder owners at this time The default permissions on this Public Folder are set to NONE. Now, if I change those permissions to AUTHOR, the Public Folder accepts E-mails without any problems. However, the issue is, that some of these folders have sensitive data, and I don't want the entire organizaion having accessing to them. Is there any way to allow the mail to be delivered to the Public Folder and still restrict who has access to it? Thanks in advance! Robert _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Slow performance
Can you confirm that running the client on the server is slow? IE eliminating the network. Cheers Paul Toothbrushes are like standards, everybody wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 23:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Don't do diskkeeper against your store. The rest of your disk stats look to be OK. Maybe someone else can give you better advice about what perfmon items to look for to help track down the issue. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance The store is on a 135gig raid 5 partition.. 64gigs is used with 70.7 gigs free.. both pub and priv are on this drive. The drives are brand new drives and the database is also new. We just migrated the users over to this server about four weeks ago. I have not run diskkeeper on it though. Ram = 1.5 gigs.. page file is 2gigs on the C drive. Wilson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance What kind of shape is your drive in? Have you run diskkeeper on it to check for fragmentation problems, and/or could you be running short of space? How does your page file compare to your RAM? David -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 1:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance Thanks. I ran perfmon but it seems to show that the HDD is being heavily used. There is a lot of information in the calendars and quite a few people use it heavily. I'll keep poking around, this just gets so frustrating when everyone is screaming in your ear that email is down. Wilson -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 11:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance We have the same problem but we have narrowed it down to a network issue. Run perfmon on the interface and check the kb's. Our server was running at like 15% but the nic was running at like 80 and killing the box. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Slow performance How much Ram do you have? Also is there a ton of info in your calander that people access at the same time? -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Slow performance Exch 2k sp2 on win2k sp2 machine (with 150 users) The machine is a Compaq DL380 hooked up to a Compaq SAN. The store drives are 5*32 gig (Raid 5) and the log and index files are on a mirrored 32 gig partition. Calendar and folder switching is very slow. Takes about 45 seconds to switch to a different folder or to access the calendar. Dismissing a calendar event can lock up outlook for several minutes. The log files and indexes are on separate drives but anything else I can do to speed this up a bit? If you can point me in the right direction, it would be very helpful. Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: urgent backup problem
Rob, I use my exch admin on XP no probs (other than the normal moving of mapi32.dll file). Cheers Paul Toothbrushes are like standards, everybody wants one but not yours. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem OK, continuing on this theme then, can I install exch admin onto an XP machine - I'm aware that it can be installed onto nt4 ws and w2k but xp? Searched technet/ archives and google but no answer yet. - oh yeah and I've also tried and tested it but... this leads me to my second prob: only got exch on sbs 4 and sbs4.5 upgrade disks and it didn't let me install as not sbs. Anyone know of a workaround? At present, I've set the serviecs to stop, then the xp machine backs up relevant files to it's disk and services re-start. Then the IS maintainance kicks in. Is this the best I'm going to get? thanks Rob -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 17:21 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Routeone Administrator Subject: RE: urgent backup problem In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job to do an Exchange backup to the disk. Installing the admin program makes NT Backup Exchange aware Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and easier and more reliable than copying the files manually Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: urgent backup problem hi all, can anyone help me with the following scenario: sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4 tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it. However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent backup of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning and also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy the relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive. However, I don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy or should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non existent... Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you very much Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: urgent backup problem
Rob, Usually you are running Outlook on the same PC, this has a different Mapi32.dll and is a version that the exch admin prog does not like. So when installing rename the Outlook one, install then make sure that the exch admin dll is copied to the bin directory it is installed to and then rename the Outlook one back. I don't know off hand where you are going to get a installable copy of the admin or what all the files it requires (there is a few as I have tried to help a friend in your position, told him in the end to get hold of a old MS select CD and install from there and patch it). Cheers Paul -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 15:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem Thanks Paul, sounds good - but rather than trying to run the install (cos I can't) does anyone know if I can copy the files across and which ones I need? And what do you mean about moving the mapi32.dll? cheers Rob -Original Message- From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem Rob, I use my exch admin on XP no probs (other than the normal moving of mapi32.dll file). Cheers Paul Toothbrushes are like standards, everybody wants one but not yours. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 September 2002 14:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: urgent backup problem OK, continuing on this theme then, can I install exch admin onto an XP machine - I'm aware that it can be installed onto nt4 ws and w2k but xp? Searched technet/ archives and google but no answer yet. - oh yeah and I've also tried and tested it but... this leads me to my second prob: only got exch on sbs 4 and sbs4.5 upgrade disks and it didn't let me install as not sbs. Anyone know of a workaround? At present, I've set the serviecs to stop, then the xp machine backs up relevant files to it's disk and services re-start. Then the IS maintainance kicks in. Is this the best I'm going to get? thanks Rob -Original Message- From: Chris Quinn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 17:21 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Routeone Administrator Subject: RE: urgent backup problem In a similar situation, I installed Exchange admin on a Win 2000 machine with a large, almost empty, hard disk, then set up a Windows backup job to do an Exchange backup to the disk. Installing the admin program makes NT Backup Exchange aware Not as good as doing a tape backup, but better than nothing at all, and easier and more reliable than copying the files manually Chris Quinn IT Manager Blue Planet Aquarium -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: urgent backup problem hi all, can anyone help me with the following scenario: sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4 tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it. However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been no decent backup of exchange data. i've re-read the wp on disaster and recovery planning and also the wp on disaster recovery which was kind of useful but as have no tape drive or hot spare then I've decided to stop the services and copy the relevant files (*.edb/ *.dir/ *.log/etc) to a network drive. However, I don't think I've got the syntax right for xcopy (would include it but haven't got it with me) and also I scheduled it to run at 23.00 but had error saying did not start - not sure why yet. Should I be using xcopy or should I use plain copy? Has anyone got any tips or syntax for copy - my programming skills (yes even for batch files) are virtually non existent... Am I missing anything? Could anyone replying cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] thank you very much Rob Support Analyst T.K.C. Sales Ltd. 5 Ashmead Industrial Estate Keynsham Bristol BS31 1TZ UK Tel: 0870 870 0150 ext 302 intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives
