Just to add to this thread. If you do implement SSL on the back-end, it
can cause a bit of a config headache in the future if you want to add
OMA and ActiveSync. Basically, with SSL present, you cannot simply use
the default configuration for ActiveSync and OMA - new virtual
directories must be
Agreed on that. When I give customers the overall choices, i.e. spread
users randomly across databases and reduce risks to common groups of
users if a database fails, or group certain types of users together on
the same database based on the need to collaborate and therefore improve
SIS, they
Shirley you can't be serious?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
[MVP]
Posted At: 07 January 2004 16:54
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Internet Mail Issues
Subject: RE: Internet Mail Issues
Who is Shirley
Does OWA work on the back-end server only?
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M2web
Posted At: 22 December 2003 21:39
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: HTTP error 404 and OWA
Subject: HTTP error 404 and OWA
I have a
I think Ed's answer was appropriate given the amount of information you
gave out in your first post.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Posted At: 22 December 2003 15:22
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation:
Definitely. On an Exchange server with more than 1GB RAM, Advanced
Server is recommended so you can apply the /3GB switch to boot.ini.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atkinson, Miles
Posted At: 05 December 2003 09:16
Posted To:
You mean you want to know what the minimum space requirement is before
the Exchange services shut down, like the Exchange 5.5 MTA shuts down
where there's 10MB or less disk space? I don't know what they are for
Exchange 2000. :-(
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why install W2k3 first if that renders Exchange 2000 useless?!
I was using Outlook 2003 first, as were some others in the office here.
We in-placed upgraded to Exchange 2003. Windows 2003 is being applied
this weekend. Clients can go any time really, but the best features
will be had when on
It's an incredibly uneventful procedure.
1. Take a backup.
2. Insert CD - run setup and choose to reinstall.
3. Apply service pack.
Pretty boring stuff really.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith
Posted At: 12 November
The 16GB limit applies to the size of the EDB and STM files added
together.
Also, see this:
http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/09/temporarily_inc.html
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith
Posted At: 11 November
No.
I've covered some of the basic rules here:
http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/upgrading_to_ex.html
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Finnesey
Posted At: 03 November 2003 03:18
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
This is the first one, if you mean by first the admin exam, and
second the design exam.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Posted At: 03 November 2003 14:08
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Exchange
It depends entirely on your business needs; that's why you normally get
loads of different answers to this sort of question. There's no right
or wrong answer.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Schaible
Posted At: 03 November 2003
GWART! :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 28 October 2003 20:39
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Exch 5.5 Routing Question
Subject: Re: Exch 5.5 Routing Question
I believe the Qwart file takes care of that in 5.5 which
Log on Locally is no longer required for OWA. This change came with
E2k.
As for your problem, see this:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=327843
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Microsoft Exchange List Server
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 24 October 2003 23:47
Posted To: Swynk
Download the Migration Guide. I wrote about LCS documents here:
http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/10/live_communicat.html
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Bailey, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 28 October 2003 17:35
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Really? I thought it rolled.
-Original Message-
From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 29 October 2003 13:43
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Tumbleweed
Subject: RE: Tumbleweed
Tumbleweed rocks.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Sollars
In the Front-End Toplogy guide whitepaper from Microsoft on Exchange
*2000*, that's the recommended approach.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 21 October 2003 22:25
Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Upgrade 2000 to 2003
Make sure you make the changes in Exchange System Manager, and not IIS
Manager, otherwise they'll be overwritten by a sub-process of the System
Attendant called DS2MB.
As for the red icons, that's a benign error:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=259373
Neil
-Original Message-
From:
MOM will do most of this for you, but you may also want to consider an
additional product like Promodag Reports or MessageStats from Quest.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 12 September 2003 14:55
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Does this fit the bill?
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=327378
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 15 August 2003 14:44
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Storage limts not working
Subject: Storage limts not working
Exchange
If you had an E2k3 back-end server without an E2k3 front-end server, it
wouldn't be supported. That's no.3 in the list here:
http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/exchange_2000_2.html
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 06
Ah, that old chestnut! Use a column 'secondary-proxy-addresses'. See
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=148339
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Wood, Harriet [CCS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 12 August 2003 11:44
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Secondary smtp
Administrative
Group? Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
If you had an E2k3 back-end server without an E2k3 front-end server, it
wouldn't be supported. That's
: Upgrade of FE to E2K3
They don't have to be in place upgrades correct? We can bring in a new
Exchange 2003 FE server into the Admin Group and then remove the old?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:23 AM
To: Exchange
Indeed. I knocked up a script to remind me weekly of the size of
Badmail, and I've put it up here:
http://hellomate.typepad.com/exchange/2003/07/dealing_with_ba.html
It wouldn't be too difficult to make it automatically delete the
contents, too.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff,
If you right-click the actual queue and bring up the properties, what
does the status say?
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Jason Rader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 04 August 2003 14:35
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Messages stuck in queue
Subject: Messages stuck in
: RE: Messages stuck in queue
The handle is invalid
Jason
From: Neil Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Messages stuck in queue
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:49:53 +0100
If you right-click the actual queue
Also, if you restart the SMTP VS or reboot, do things improve?
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson
Posted At: 04 August 2003 15:05
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Messages stuck in queue
Subject: RE: Messages stuck in queue
Hmmm...not an easy to troubleshoot
know
what they say.
Jason
From: Neil Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Messages stuck in queue
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:09:38 +0100
Also, if you restart the SMTP VS or reboot, do things improve?
Neil
Feel sorry for my last employers, who were local government. They're
still running Lotus Notes. Names witheld to protect the guilty.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 31 July 2003 16:16
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Upgrade
I fancy trying this over-invoicing of old contracts technique; a few
carefully-maniuplated funds wouldn't go amiss. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 31 July 2003 16:46
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL
Subject:
how many organisations are still running NT 3.51 or MS Mail?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 July 2003 16:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions
Feel sorry for my last employers, who were local government. They're
still
Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions
Meh.
Whatever does the job.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 July 2003 16:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Upgrade Questions
We had a customer request MSMail support late last year. We all ran for
cover.
Neil
4 commons ways RUS can break are below. They may not all be appropriate
to you, but I've cut pasted them from a word doc of mine. :-)
1) RUS configuration references a deleted DC or E2K server, or the
servers defined in RUS configuration are flakey at best. Browse both
entries and choose
I've gone as far as disabling services and rebooting sometimes.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Clemens, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 25 July 2003 16:20
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Error Loading SP4 on Exchange 2000
Subject: RE: Error Loading SP4 on Exchange
No, not 'always'. The key thing is to make sure the online maint window
is outside of your backup window, otherwise the backup process will halt
the maintenance. 01:00 - 07:00 is ok. If the window is larger than is
required by the process, multiple runs of the maintenance take place.
Check your
Get it from PSS; that's where I got mine. It'll be free, too.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Joe Haines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 18 July 2003 15:49
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: corrupted calendar
Subject: corrupted calendar
Anybody know where i can download
Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 11:55 AM Posted To: Exchange
Discussion List
Conversation: The spam that gets through
Subject: RE: The spam that gets through
If it gets past the database of known spam
That all sounds very familiar! :-)
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 09 July 2003 12:39
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: The spam that gets through
Subject: RE: The spam that gets through
We still do that seat of the pants. We
Promodag is good, as is MessageStats from Quest (www.quest.com)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Mark Condron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 09 July 2003 13:51
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Exchange 2k log reporting
Subject: Exchange 2k log reporting
All,
I would
The Yahoo Groups Outlook list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Neil
-Original Message-
From: The BOYZ from BHUTAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 09 July 2003 09:17
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: OT - MS Outlook mailing list
Subject: OT - MS Outlook mailing list
Does anyone know
If it gets past the database of known spam (we use SurfControl), then it
also undergoes a keyword scan. Sometimes this blocks legitimate mail,
which is a PITA. I've removed myself from the keyword scanning, as I
was spending more time getting messgaes released than I was dealing with
spam. It
I've just shaken my head and sighed at today's OOF messages I've got.
:-)
Including Liam Murphy at HP who I used to work with. Hi Liam!
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 08 July 2003 16:47
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation:
Sure we do, but sometimes it's nice to have some info on setting up the
lab. :-)
Mike - just run the ExDeploy utility supplied on the E2k3 CD - it covers
step-by-step several scenarios of installation, including deploying an
additional E2k3 server.
Neil
-Original Message-
From:
If OOF isn't working at all for this user, it could be that this user's
OOF message is corrupt. Try the following:
The OOF message is a hidden entry in the user's mailbox. The Out of
Office Assistant creates a set of two rules in the Inbox subtree.
The first contains a Message Class of
Put all ben.com and bill.com users in separate groups, then use Delivery
Restrictions on each SMTP Connector. Should do the trick.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Pike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 20 June 2003 14:53
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: SMTP
More of a script than a reg hack...
It's a part of my standard E2k server build!
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=305145
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 13 June 2003 17:08
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: E2K machine services
Four common ways the RUS can break:
These are the most common ways that the RUS can break:
1) RUS configuration references a deleted DC or E2K server, or the
servers defined in RUS configuration are flakey at best. Browse both
entries and choose alternates, if available.
2) Inheritable
checked all of this. I don't get any errors in the application log
except the one mentioned. Everything is set to maximum logging. I'm
stuck.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Four common ways
The last I heard, mainstream support for 5.5 ends on Dec 31st 2003, so
that may be a good enough reason. You should have stuck with MSMail -
no need for that expensive Exchange rubbish! :-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 09 June 2003
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 09 June 2003 15:56
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: RUS problems
Subject: RE: RUS problems
Nope Not yet. I am going to reboot tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto
Indeed. However, Lotus Notes has a fabulous solution to this problem,
as Notes can prevent messages from being forwarded on, etc. To invoke
this solution, you simply click the 'Enable Bull$hit Security'[1] tick
box.
Neil
[1] To coin an Ed C phrase
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir
Depends on what error you see in the queue. The normal one here is
'network error during host resolution' or something like that. Try
doing an nslookup, and manually connecting via port 25 to the
destination server.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL
AFAIK, yes, since you're using E2k. If you were 5.5, then no.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 04 June 2003 15:50
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Outlook XP Licensing
Subject: Outlook XP Licensing
When you purchase sufficient
Indeed. The technical explanation I'd seen was that code that modifies the contents
of messages in transport, as in the case of a disclaimer, can corrupt the STM if the
mail is submitted on the server using DAV, and not, say, other methods such as MAPI,
SMTP, and X.400.
Neil
-Original
Not to mention that there's a limit of around 850 entries for the filter
list. This is an AD limit.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: David Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 28 May 2003 14:39
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Filtering
Subject: Re: Filtering
adding
Nice, but Avi's using Exchange 2000 since he mentioned 'Exchange System
Manager' ;-)
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 28 May 2003 15:12
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Filtering
Subject: RE: Filtering
Avi,
1.
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Filtering
Subject: RE: Filtering
But can you just copy paste to it as well?
I don't code, even a little bit, nor do I ever care to.
Avi
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 8:46 AM
They're no longer held in the registry; they're held in Active
Directory.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 28 May 2003 16:44
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Filtering
Subject: RE: Filtering
However...Jim McBee (the
It's simply a multi-valued attribute in AD; it's fairly easy to write
code to import/export this - check out the link below as an example.
http://www.cdolive.net/download/Exchange2000MessageFilterList.zip
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted
Without SSL, it will be just port 80. Straight into the internal
network? WOW!
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Dubyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 04 April 2003 11:34
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Aaaaggg - What ports for OWA through only 1
I thought Exchange 2000 supported online backup of the KMS.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 26 March 2003 15:25
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Quick question re backup
Subject: RE: Quick question re backup
Do not back up M:
I did just reply on the MS newsgroups on this, but I'll reply here as
well. You cannot rename an Exchange server, so your options are to
rebuild the server with a new name, or put in a 3rd party relay that
offers the chance to say HELO using a different name.
Neil
-Original Message-
Message-
From: Neil Hobson
Posted At: 24 March 2003 15:00
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Renaming E2K server
Subject: RE: Renaming E2K server
I did just reply on the MS newsgroups on this, but I'll reply here as
well. You cannot rename an Exchange server, so your options
Contact me offlist, as I've a MS utility to do this for you.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: 19 March 2003 15:43
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Migrating Contacts from Lotus Notes
Subject: Migrating Contacts from Lotus
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=195519
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Bennett, Warren Mr 5 SIG CMD
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 14 February 2003 15:13
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Crashed exchange transaction log file partition
Subject: Crashed exchange
Not that I'm aware of. But how would the Notes feature stop me
re-typing the message and sending that?
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Norris Carden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 14 February 2003 17:15
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Ex2k v. Notes R5 question
Admins are denied access to all mailboxes by default in Exchange 2000.
For workarounds, see:
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=262054
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 10 February 2003 14:37
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation:
Just follow this:
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/MF009.html
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 27 January 2003 15:57
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Blocking users from Internet mail
Subject: Blocking users from Internet
the instructions in this article, then the users without
Internet email won't be able to use OWA. You'd have to create a new HTTP
virtual directory for them that handles the fake smtp address that you
use.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday
A virus? Nah, that's the information stores on servers mailing each
other. Has anyone made any replication frequency changes for the public
stores recently? Or perhaps someone has dumped a load of data into a
public folder that replicates everywhere? Or added new replicas?
Neil
Not that I've heard of. From 325316:
There is no difference between running forestprep from the service pack
and running it from the installation CD-ROM.
I'd be interested to know otherwise.
Different kettle of fish for the ADC, though.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad
Have you tried the /resetfolders switch?
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Watkins V [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 08 January 2003 15:49
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: User Deleted inbox
Subject: User Deleted inbox
Dear all
A user has somehow deleted his inbox
Download it
-Original Message-
From: Charles Marriott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 08 January 2003 16:21
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
DL it?
-Original Message-
From:
I learn a new acronym nearly every day now! www.acronymfinder.com is my
friend. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 08 January 2003 16:22
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
Subject: RE:
available
Or change the properties of the CD you burned to use UTF instead of
joliet filesystem.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Titanium Beta 2 publicly available
Download
Not that I know of, because they're a client thing.
If you're really desperate for such a feature, you may want to upgrade
to E2k and implement a store synchronous event sink, such as:
http://www.ivasoft.biz/rrr.html
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Furman, Morris [mailto:[EMAIL
That would really add up over 10,000 years. Should give him time for
Titanium to be released.
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 20 December 2002 17:03
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Slow Mailbox Size Limit Change
Subject:
Too much information.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 19 December 2002 17:15
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Online Defragmentation
Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation
That's ok I'm not wearing underwear today
Indeed. I believe that things like things can be caused by scanning the M: drive
(there's a tech article from MS somewhere).
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Boynton, Todd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 18 December 2002 15:30
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation:
I would. You don't have to do a -fix straight away, either. I've seen
quite a few posts over the years to do with fixing 1025s with isinteg.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Thompson, Elizabeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 16 December 2002 13:58
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
In my experience, you need to let the store play 'catch-up', e.g. you
set the limit to 10 days, and the oldest message is only 9 days old. If
you've got a message 11 days old in the folder, it won't get deleted.
At least, that was my 5.5 experience. Worth a try.
Neil
-Original
By 'ghosted out' do you mean just a white icon? If so, that's how they
normally look.
The process for removing them that I perform is to use the 5.5 admin
program on the E2k server, connecting to the server running SRS. You
then delete the 5.5 server from the site as you'd normally do. Is
Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 11:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5 Servers
By 'ghosted out' do you mean just a white icon? If so, that's
, it's been well over a month. And they are still resident in the
ESM.
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday
information, click
http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp.
__
John Bowles
Exchange Administrator
Enterprise Support Engineering
Celera Genomics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002
I believe it to be the 'msExchPoliciesIncluded' attribute.
I think a zero value means the check box is not selected, but you'll see
that when it is activated, it has the IDs of the policies included.
Don't forget to try on a test system first!
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Paul X.
John Westworth at Microsoft has written a useful utility to do this.
It's on the Migration Tools Resources CD available from MS, but
contact me offlist if you'd like a copy.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Haber, David J. [mailto:David.Haber;vtmednet.org]
Posted At: 04 November 2002
Probably because the message is waiting to hit the expiration timeout
value set in the SMTP VS.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 16 October 2002 14:31
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: a wish
Subject: SMTP retry queues
I've moved quite a few organisations from 5.5 to 2000, and I've stuck
with the ADC and the move-mailbox method. This has also included some
dodgy 5.5 installations.
Clean up the 5.5 install before the migration; delete unwanted
connectors, mailboxes, public folders, etc. Also, as part of the
Check out:
http://victori.hypermart.net/unisent.html
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 24 September 2002 12:34
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: changing location of sent item in outlook 2000
Subject: changing location of sent
Right-click the public folder / Properties / Outlook Address Book tab /
tick the Show this folder as an email address book box.
When they compose a new message and click To... they'll be able to
select the public folder as an address book from the drop-down list.
Neil
-Original
You mean like disabling the creation of top-level public folders?
Look at:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q256131
Neil
- Original Message -
From: Busby, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:33 PM
5Mb was quite large in MSMail days! :-)
Looks rather small these days, IMHO.
Neil
- Original Message -
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 4:45 PM
Subject: RE: need ammo
IIRC, the 5MB limit comes
Internet Mail Service / Connections tab / Time-outs button.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 30 August 2002 00:56
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Undeliverable
Subject: Undeliverable
Hi Everyone,
One of our staff has
Yes, as you'll need to do this before removing the ADC. Check out the
article below for further info.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q272314
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 30 August 2002 13:16
Posted To:
Or you'll be so big you'll get your own personal zip code. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 28 August 2002 12:24
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Exchange Service Providing
Subject: RE: Exchange Service Providing
If I dont
You could still log into his mailbox using your client - just give
yourself rights to the mailbox.
Alternatively, you could try getting the user to open the message with
OWA.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 27 August 2002 11:10
Posted
'Remote' is a custom recipient, so it looks as if you've already created
this object. Have you checked to see if it's hidden?
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Greg Heywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 27 August 2002 11:33
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: Remote
1 - 100 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
