---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/27/2013 11:44 AM, bobpriced@... mailto:bobpriced@... wrote:
Richard Macro (#39)
How's the book coming?
You've been reading it, Bob, or maybe not. Go figure.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bbv5B71KmkA
On 12/28/2013 12:22 PM, bobpri...@yahoo.com wrote:
/Richard Macro (#39)/
//
/How's the book coming?/
You've been reading it, Bob, or maybe not. Go figure.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bbv5B71KmkA
You are supposed to read the messages here BEFORE you post your
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/28/2013 12:22 PM, bobpriced@... mailto:bobpriced@... wrote:
Richard Macro (#39)
How's the book coming?
You've been reading it, Bob, or maybe not. Go figure.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bbv5B71KmkA
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams wrote:
There's no way that Barry is more distraught about Robin than you are
about Barry. In fact, I'd say your a thousand-fold more distraught
about
Barry - in fact, about seventeen years worth of distraught. 1996 -
2013.
Now that's
Apparently Judy took me seriously. LoL!
On 12/26/2013 6:04 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he
says is to be taken seriously.*
Ooopsie, somebody's buttons got pushed again. Go figure.
Good work, Barry!
*/You
On 12/26/2013 10:58 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
Did that monkey hurt you as it was clawing its way out of your ass,
Retardo?
What are you doing inside my ass, Annie?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams wrote:
On 12/26/2013 6:04 PM, authfriend@... wrote:
*As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he
says is to be taken seriously.*
Apparently Judy took me seriously. LoL!
Even those who don't much like
It looks like Judy took Richard seriously. LoL!
On 12/26/2013 11:15 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be
taken seriously. *
There's no way that Barry is more distraught about Robin than you
are about Barry. In fact, I'd
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, turquoiseb@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams wrote:
There's no way that Barry is more distraught about Robin than you are
about Barry. In fact, I'd say your a thousand-fold more distraught about
Barry - in fact,
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/26/2013 10:58 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
Did that monkey hurt you as it was clawing its way out of your ass, Retardo?
What are you doing inside my ass, Annie?
Did I ever tell you I love to be
On 12/27/2013 3:53 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
*/I knew basically nothing about him, his silly posturing back in the
day being long after my time in the TMO. So pretty much the only
things I had to judge him by were his posts. And the posts, from Day
One, were insane. Stark, raving bonkers. I don't
This is such deep and elaborate fantasy from Barry that there's no real way to
address it. It's a function of how threatened he was by Robin. Barry's response
to feeling threatened has always been to go to insane extremes to demonize the
person who threatens him, no matter how far from reality
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/27/2013 3:53 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
I knew basically nothing about him, his silly posturing back in the day being
long after my time in the TMO. So pretty much the only things I had to judge
him by were his posts. And the
On 12/27/2013 7:50 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
*As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he
says is to be taken seriously.*
Apparently Judy took me seriously. LoL!
*/Even those who don't much like Richard have to admit that this is
funny. :-/*
Well, I thought so too. In
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be taken
seriously.
Especially this post. What it amounts to is Richard trying to tell as many
lies as he can come up with. He seems to be in competition with Barry in this
regard.
This is the sort of thing that
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/26/2013 12:55 PM, obbajeeba wrote:
Posting limits are for complainers.
Parodies are for posers.
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/368333
Richard, I thought it was pretty funny too and thanks for the insights about
Judy's online history. Sort of helps me understand her better. In fact, I found
a lot of your posts this morning very insightful about people. I also like how
you can be gentle about it.
But what happened to Ann?!
Another button got pushed today - good work, Barry!
On 12/27/2013 9:14 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*This is such deep and elaborate fantasy from Barry that there's no
real way to address it. It's a function of how threatened he was by
Robin. Barry's response to feeling threatened has
Richard, I thought it was pretty funny too and thanks for the insights about
Judy's online history. Sort of helps me understand her better.
They weren't insights, Share, they were things Richard made up. As you know,
as Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
Nobody claimed you were a writer. Writers, write - ankle-biters, bite.
Richard, something to consider before you bend over:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjLzjW5JW5I
On 12/26/2013 1:44 PM,
It sure looks like Judy is taking me seriously. Not sure if that's a
good thing or not. Go figure.
On 12/27/2013 9:40 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be
taken seriously. *
*
*
*Especially this post. What it amounts to is
On 12/27/2013 10:44 AM, bobpri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Richard, something to consider before you bend over:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjLzjW5JW5I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjLzjW5JW5I%0A
Bob, let's try to focus on the topic and not get lost in the abstract. I
already told you - I'm not
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
There's no way that Barry is more distraught about Robin than you are about
Barry. In fact, I'd say your a thousand-fold more distraught about Barry - in
fact, about seventeen years worth of distraught. 1996 - 2013. Now that's
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, sharelong60@... wrote:
snip
As for Bob, I guess I just don't get the British sense of humor. Go figure!
We need more cowbell:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ix7jqxXQ2I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ix7jqxXQ2I
On Friday, December 27,
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
snip I'm not gay.
Richard Macro (#39)
How's the book coming?
On 12/27/2013 11:44 AM, bobpri...@yahoo.com wrote:
/Richard Macro (#39)/
//
/How's the book coming?/
You've been reading it, Bob, or maybe not. Go figure.
On 12/27/2013 10:21 AM, Share Long wrote:
Richard, I thought it was pretty funny too and thanks for the insights
about Judy's online history.
So, let's review what we know about Ms Stein: According to her
autobiography, Judy lives near a beach in New Jersey and is a
self-employed professional
Stuff in red is not true.
So, let's review what we know about Ms Stein: According to her
autobiography, Judy lives near a beach in New Jersey and is a
self-employed professional editor working out of a home office on a
Windows PC running Microsoft Word as her personal productivity tool.
Ahem. Let's hear what the self-proclaimed resident expert on everything
said about posting limits back during the period when they were being
debated as a way to get HER and two other idiots to stop making 100-150
posts per week and STFU:
If anybody thinks Barry would be so insistently--
and
I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just
fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline
and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn
well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people.
---In
I am just a humble meditator. I could help moderate this. I have shoveled a
lot of shit in my lifetime. I am going to go out right now by dawn's early
light before going to the morning Dome meditation to shovel some shit. I feel
that by by life's fullest and long experience that I could be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or
lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they
should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do
simple shit you can damn well do
Brings up an interesting question: why don't Judy and Ann filter out Richard?
And me and turq and feste and whoever else is on their unacceptable list. And
if they don't want to delete those posts, it's simple enough to create a Maybe
Read Later folder. I now have over 50 posts in my Maybe Read
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
Brings up an interesting question: why don't Judy and Ann filter out
Richard? And me and turq and feste and whoever else is on their
unacceptable list.
Especially if, *as they claim*, neither they nor anyone else here takes
what any of us
Hooray!!! I am always in favor of self-sufficiency, especially when it comes to
something as extraneous and just for fun, as a web forum. Even if I post 10,000
posts next week, no will miss a meal or lose a loved one. This issue in terms
of stuff that matters, falls way down near the bottom of
On 12/26/2013 6:19 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
*/If anyone on it has gone over 75 posts, the moderator just blocks
their address and bans them from posting, FOREVER. /*
Apparently you failed to realize that anyone can post here even if they
are banned, just by altering their alias. But, thanks for
I'm not sure how you filter out a particular person's posts when you're
reading on the Web site. If you're picking and choosing only a few posts to
read of the traffic generally, as Barry claims he does, then working from
Message View is the way to go. But if you're going from post to post via
In the case of Judy, she's probably busy creating macros. But,
seriously, if she isn't using Mozilla Thunderbird, she probably doesn't
even know ho to set a filter in Yahoo Mail, even if she wanted to. It
looks like she can't even figure out NEO and Yahoo Mail. Go figure.
But for someone with
On 12/26/2013 6:51 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
*/Thanks again for the Christmas present, Richard. :-)/*
Judy is the gift that keeps on giving. I'm not sure I could do without
her. I told her years ago Please don't feed it. But she completely
ignored my plea. So, now that I'm free, you can put money
Let Buck moderate
In a message dated 12/25/2013 11:36:41 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
pundits...@gmail.com writes:
On 12/25/2013 10:26 PM, _authfriend@yahoo.com_
(mailto:authfri...@yahoo.com) wrote:
But something really does have to be done about Richard.
Here's something you could
On 12/26/2013 7:33 AM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com wrote:
As for Richard's postings, they all look the same to me - nothing
differentiates one from another, so, no offense, please, but I don't
think I have read one in months.
No offense, but none of my posts were addressed to you anyway.
On 12/26/2013 8:25 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*In any case, as I go through the posts, I've always skipped quickly
past Richard's. These days I /do/ have to scan them briefly since he's
into telling lies about me, and not all of them are instantly
discernible as such by others. I need to
A whole truckload more dishonesty from Barry:
Ahem. Let's hear what the self-proclaimed resident expert on everything
said about posting limits back during the period when they were being debated
as a way to get HER and two other idiots to stop making 100-150 posts per week
and STFU:
If
Sez Barry, knowing I didn't ask for posting limits, I pointed out to Ann that
we weren't going to get them (as Alex has confirmed). As he also knows, the
posting limits were not invented just for me by any means.
The sign of a chronic, compulsive stalker-liar is that he isn't selective in
More lies from the wimp:
Brings up an interesting question: why don't Judy and Ann filter out
Richard? And me and turq and feste and whoever else is on their unacceptable
list.
Especially if, *as they claim*, neither they nor anyone else here takes
what any of us says seriously.
The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual
immaturity. It's like needing training wheels or diapers to be on
the Internet.
On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com wrote:
I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or
lazy to just fucking
That's pretty damned funny Richard. I don't mean to be an enabler, but I'm
gonna come out of hiding for this one.
It's a wonder you and Buck can even turn on a computer let alone read
FFL. Maybe 15 lifetimes from now Buck will be ready to moderate a
Yahoo Group.:-D
On 12/26/2013 06:36 AM, wle...@aol.com wrote:
Let Buck moderate
In a message dated 12/25/2013 11:36:41 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
Gee, Bhairitu, Barry was extremely fond of the posting limits. You don't mean
to suggest he's spiritually immature, do you?
The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual immaturity. It's
like needing training wheels or diapers to be on the Internet.
On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Gee, Bhairitu, Barry was extremely fond of the posting limits. You
don't mean to suggest he's spiritually immature, do you?
As Bhairitu is probably aware, Barry was fond of the posting limits
because Judy was not. They *were*, after all, created
I have always been opposed to posting limits because they display a lack
of maturity and ability to use the Internet. I only created the post
count script because people weren't even adult enough to maintain their
own count. And like I often said to Alex, if he were to mention to the
Yahoo
Gee, Bhairitu, Barry was extremely fond of the posting limits. You don't
mean to suggest he's spiritually immature, do you?
As Bhairitu is probably aware, Barry was fond of the posting limits because
Judy was not.
This is one of the very few true things Barry has said in this
Ooopsie, somebody's buttons got pushed again. Go figure. Good work, Barry!
On 12/26/2013 10:14 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
A whole truckload more dishonesty from Barry:
*/ Ahem. Let's hear what the self-proclaimed resident expert on
everything said about posting limits back during the
Maybe Barry was posting a parody. Judy is easily the target of a parody,
as Robin demonstrated. Apparently Judy will fall for any parody, even
one by Robin that looks like the truth. Go figure.
Everyone knows that Judy was the top poster around here for years - she
can't resist posting some
Posting limits are for complainers.
On 12/26/2013 10:38 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*the only posts Richard were making were the ones stalking Ann and me*
You need to stop the lying, Ms Stein. For the record, Judy has been
stalking me for over a decade. The proof is in the archives. I came over
here long before Judy, to try
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Ooopsie, somebody's buttons got pushed again. Go figure. Good work,
Barry!
You reminded me how easy it is TO push her buttons, so I figured I'd add
to your work. :-)
The most fascinating thing about it all, from a psychological
It's also a sure sign of defeat in a fair debate. Judy wants this forum
to look like the laughing stock of Yahoo Groups. Otherwise she'd be
posting something interesting to read instead of wasting time posting
snarky messages all day and into the night. She used to be the top
poster, but now
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be
taken seriously.
Maybe Barry was posting a parody. Judy is easily the target of a parody, as
Robin demonstrated. Apparently Judy will fall for any parody, even one by Robin
that looks like the truth. Go
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be
taken seriously.
The only posts Richard were making were the ones stalking Ann and me You
need to stop the lying, Ms Stein. For the record, Judy has been stalking me for
over a decade. The proof is in the
More, um, wishful thinking from Barry. ;-)
The most fascinating thing about it all, from a psychological point of
view, is that Judy actually thinks she's winning. So does Ann. But then, both
of them are so clueless that they climbed all over themselves to see who could
kiss Robin's ass the
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be
taken seriously.
It's also a sure sign of defeat in a fair debate. Judy wants this forum to
look like the laughing stock of Yahoo Groups. Otherwise she'd be posting
something interesting to read instead of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams wrote:
It's also a sure sign of defeat in a fair debate. Judy wants this
forum
to look like the laughing stock of Yahoo Groups. Otherwise she'd be
posting something interesting to read instead of wasting time posting
snarky messages
Oooopsie! Never claimed to be a writer.
It's also a sure sign of defeat in a fair debate. Judy wants this forum
to look like the laughing stock of Yahoo Groups. Otherwise she'd be
posting something interesting to read instead of wasting time posting
snarky messages all day and into
Of course FFL is NOT a debate group. It's a chat group. Maybe that is
some folks first mistake: discussion groups on the Internet are NOT
debate groups. Otherwise this would be FFD or Fairfield Debates. :-D
On 12/26/2013 11:17 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
It's also a sure sign of defeat
While I do not think posting will be reimposed, I liked the 50 post limit. But
I would give Richard an extra 50 per week as a bonus for his accomplishment.
Oh, nonsense, Bhairitu. There's no such rigid distinction as you suggest.
Sometimes discussions involve debates, sometimes not. There have always been
debates on FFL.
Of course FFL is NOT a debate group. It's a chat group. Maybe that is some
folks first mistake: discussion groups on the
My question Buck, is what is 'quite fair enforcing a posting limit'? All you
have to do is make sure nobody posted over a specified limit, and lock them out
for the specified penalty. It is mechanical, fairness is not involved. From
your past statements here one can conclude you have more
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:
More, um, wishful thinking from Barry. ;-)
The most fascinating thing about it all, from a psychological point of
view, is that Judy actually thinks she's winning. So does Ann. But then, both
of them are so clueless that they
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote:
My question Buck, is what is 'quite fair enforcing a posting limit'? All you
have to do is make sure nobody posted over a specified limit, and lock them out
for the specified penalty. It is mechanical, fairness is not involved.
Barry stopped dialoguing long ago with people who he knew had seen through him.
He's terribly intimidated by intelligent people.
Poor Barry was wildly, insanely jealous of Robin. Still is. Brings him up
at every opportunity even long after he's left. I've never seen Barry so
distraught by a
Perhaps you got sidetracked here on your way to this site:
http://www.debate.org/
On 12/26/2013 01:11 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*Oh, nonsense, Bhairitu. There's no such rigid distinction as you
suggest. Sometimes discussions involve debates, sometimes not. There
have always been
On 12/26/2013 12:55 PM, obbajeeba wrote:
Posting limits are for complainers.
Parodies are for posers.
On 12/26/2013 1:05 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Ooopsie, somebody's buttons got pushed again. Go figure. Good work,
Barry!
*/You reminded me how easy it is TO push her buttons, so I figured I'd
add to your work. :-)
The most fascinating thing about it all, from a psychological point of
view, is
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be
taken seriously.
Ooopsie, somebody's buttons got pushed again. Go figure. Good work, Barry!
You reminded me how easy it is TO push her buttons, so I figured I'd add to
your work. :-)
The most fascinating
There's no way that Barry is more distraught about Robin than you are
about Barry. In fact, I'd say your a thousand-fold more distraught about
Barry - in fact, about seventeen years worth of distraught. 1996 - 2013.
Now that's being distraught!
On 12/26/2013 1:26 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com
Nobody claimed you were a writer. Writers, write - ankle-biters, bite.
On 12/26/2013 1:44 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*Oooopsie! Never claimed to be a writer.*
It's also a sure sign of defeat in a fair debate. Judy wants this forum
to look like the laughing stock of Yahoo
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:
On 12/26/2013 1:05 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Ooopsie, somebody's buttons got pushed again. Go figure. Good work, Barry!
You reminded me how easy it is TO push her buttons, so I figured I'd add to
your work. :-)
The most
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186, nothing he says is to be taken
seriously.
There's no way that Barry is more distraught about Robin than you are about
Barry. In fact, I'd say your a thousand-fold more distraught about Barry - in
fact, about seventeen years worth of distraught.
I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit.
However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex
is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read
the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has
On 12/25/2013 10:26 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
But something really does have to be done about Richard.
Here's something you could do: STFU about Richard.
shempmcgurk wrote:
Just as I thought.
Judy is an alien with 50 fingers.
I was looking at my FFL file in Thunderbird and thought that I might
write a little utility to report the number of posts during a specific
week. My FFL folder holds a little more than a week back then
autodeletes so I
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Bhairitu
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 2:01 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
shempmcgurk wrote:
Just as I thought.
Judy is an alien with 50 fingers.
I was looking
Rick Archer wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Bhairitu
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 2:01 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
shempmcgurk wrote:
Just as I thought.
Judy is an alien
-Original Message-
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bhairitu
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 9:21 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
I finished up a preliminary version that filters and counts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Judy 53
Lawson 65
I'll cut Judy some slack because she is always
conscientious and my count may be off slightly.
I made 50 posts by my hand count.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
snip
Judy 53
Lawson 65
I'll cut Judy some slack because she is always
conscientious and my count may be off slightly.
I made 50 posts by
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
I have special dispensation.
I'm on a mission from God.
Well, I do think that we can all agree that you are special.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
I have special dispensation.
I'm on a mission from God.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kirk, Shemp, and Richard Williams went over slightly last week. I'm not
going to bust them because I went over the week before, without
realizing
it. So I owe them one.
Interesting logic. Another might have concluded
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
Kirk, Shemp, and Richard Williams went over slightly last week.
I'm not
going to bust them because I went over the week before, without
realizing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope. Back to 50/week as of midnight central tonight.
(snip)
Thank you, Rick !
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By my count Judy's at 170 and Barry at 117 for the week. My count may
be inflated because I've been getting duplicates of some posts via
email.
Same old, same old.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
By my count Judy's at 170 and Barry at 117 for the week. My count may
be inflated because I've been getting duplicates of some posts via
TOTALLY INCORRECT COUNT ! ! !
I AM LESS THAN 20 POSTS THIS WEEKUntil this post (which doesn't
count ! ! ! )
OffWorld
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done but might not know it:
Jim F 37
New Morning 35
Getting Close:
Off
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of off_world_beings
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 8:48 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
TOTALLY INCORRECT COUNT ! ! !
I AM LESS THAN 20 POSTS THIS WEEKUntil
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done but might not know it:
New Morning 35
Thanks Rick. The yahoo search shows me only at 28. I am fine going
with your count. But I am surprised that Yahoo could be off by so much.
I assume you have checked
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of new.morning
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:18 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
--- In HYPERLINK
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.comFairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please remind me of what the limit is. Thanks,
35 post limit per week.
You go girl !
OffWorld
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you Lurk.
You're welcome.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I believe that meditation is (or can be) a good thing, I have
some question about the effects of many people meditating together.
I understand the theory of why the 1% should work, but that's just a
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
