It is common knowledge that poetry lovers have been frustrated
by the fact that no poet has chosen to express Jewish themes
and feelings in the haiku style (three unrhymed lines of five,
seven, and five syllables respectively). Filling this gap in poetic
iterature, David M. Bader has recently
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey do me a favor since you're in Paris. I have this favorite French rock
group called Noir Desir. They are probably the only good French hard
I used to make love in the broom closet at the bottom near the
pottery class.
So that's what that bad smell was. Was that you mastebating again in
the broom closet?
OffWorld
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and
Wow, that is so brilliant. His answers are just perfection. I'd love
to juxtapost that with that with the more recent Larry King interview.
Another classic.
Thanks for posting it.
OffWorld
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Llundrub wrote:
On every single application I have ever filled out for TMO
it
asked
if I had used any other techniques. We all
I love his movies. But the guy is a nut job.
Is this the best we can do?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, benjaminccollins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
July 20, 2005 -- IF you think Tom Cruise is wild about Scientology
and Madonna is crazy about Kabbalah, eccentric filmmaker David
Lynch
The real catch would be to get a copy of the BBC Malcolm Muggeridge
interview of MMY...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/audiointerviews/profilepages/maharishi1.sh
tml
Does anyone know where I can easily access the Larry King interview
with Maharishi?
OffWorld
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Llundrub wrote:
On every single application I have ever filled out for TMO
it
asked
if I had used any other techniques. We all
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does anyone know where I can easily access the Larry King interview
with Maharishi?
OffWorld
How this for a quick reply?
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0205/12/lklw.00.html
To subscribe, send a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The real catch would be to get a copy of the BBC Malcolm Muggeridge
interview of MMY...
Not long before Malcolm Muggeridge died he was asked who the most
memorable person he interviewed was for him. He said
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just so I understand, Lawson, you visited other teachers
and noted so when asked in course applications?
And you were admitted to
I find his movies to be very disturbing, to say the
least. Do you think anyone in the TMO has actually sat
down and watched his movies? Blue Velvet, Ereaserhead,
now there are two sattvic movies, ah?
--- shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I love his movies. But the guy is a nut job.
Is
It always had a slight moldy smell to it.
--- Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So the LC is gone now huh?
Yup. It's now an empty building site.
I liked it. I used to make love in the broom
closet at the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One of my friends has been meditating for about 30 years. He wanted
to be a TM-Teacher in the 70ths and worked as staff in Seelisberg to
accomplish that. His brother went over to another Organisation as a
On Jul 21, 2005, at 2:16 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
It is common knowledge that poetry lovers have been frustrated
by the fact that no poet has chosen to express Jewish themes
and feelings in the haiku style (three unrhymed lines of five,
seven, and five syllables respectively). Filling this gap
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find his movies to be very disturbing, to say the
least. Do you think anyone in the TMO has actually sat
down and watched his movies? Blue Velvet, Ereaserhead,
now there are two sattvic movies, ah?
On the other
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the yogic ability to tell others' states of consciousness, like
Rick
and me?
Yes.
*lol* Now that *IS* funny! :-D
Oh come on Rory, quit beating Off.
*lol* Nice pun. Unfortunately, I have to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 21, 2005, at 2:16 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
It is common knowledge that poetry lovers have been frustrated
by the fact that no poet has chosen to express Jewish themes
and feelings in the haiku style (three unrhymed
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
IMO it is Ok even if Maharishi and the TMO feel that it
isn't.
They have their logic.
I think you need to answer the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If it's confession time I visited Krishnamurti in about 1984 in
England, but he was older than Maharishi so its ok.
TURQ B wrote:
I think, Off, that I'm beginning to get a handle on when you
world peace once dreamed of
pundits soon arrival soon
when sat yug may come
chiropractors loved
the thin foamed days when you
bottomed out in pain
channeling off ramp
left path to listen to a
mediocre ghost
My P K session
stress released nervous system
then maxed out my card
remember S C
eye
I'll look around, but for the next month
or so I'm not in Parisbut down in the south of France. Such groups
aren't as popular here because it isn't trendy down here to be depressed
and self-important. That's more of a Paris thing.
:-)-Not true, I first heard of them in Aix.
To
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Everything you are talking about here, Off, is *learned behavior*,
not some eternal grand truth. You were TAUGHT that the know-
ledge of TM and of enlightenment was so fragile that it had to
be protected with
So that's what that bad smell was. Was that you
mastebating again in the broom closet?OffWorld---Smell is in
the nose.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
YAHOO!
Sorry to ramble, but there are days when the weirdassthings that
spiritual traditions do to its followers just blowmy mind.
UncYour incredulity is mere smugness of an inner fanaticism
with your own boundaries. Whether truer or more open than others, it's still a
cage. Here I threw you
More seriously, I don't know the group,
probably won't everbecause 1) as you said French and rock 'n roll just don't
mix,and 2) Bertrand Cantat managed to murder an actress I likedwho had
all the looks and talent he doesn't seem to have. :-)Anyway, it didn't
inspire me to want to find out
On Jul 21, 2005, at 8:50 AM, authfriend wrote:
The trouble with this analysis is that it's
all black-and-white, no shades of gray.
One of the problems with cult-like thinking is that it often only sees
in black and white. With the program or off the program. Purity or
impurity. Right
In one sense, hearing stories like this is a bit
liberating,because you can't even resent the idiots who did thisor have
any ill wishes towards them. Any ill-wishing would be completely
redundant and useless. To be able to think like this, and justify this
kind of action, thepeople
I think my friend is more enlightened than most of us. He meditates
TM regular, he is very devoted to the Ved and he encourage people to
start with TM. He has tried several times to apply for the TM-Sidhi-
course, they don't even bother to answer him, and still he has no
bitterness and anger.
They have their logic. I think you need to answer the question I
asked several posts back about keeping the purity of the teachiing.I
have to ask myself this question: If there was littleattempt to keep the
purity of the teaching by being careful whatgets interjected and absorbed in
to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll look around, but for the next month or so I'm not in Paris
but down in the south of France. Such groups aren't as
popular here because it isn't trendy down here to be
depressed and self-important. That's more
--Ken Wilber
Just another wuss who justifies believing he's right about things. :-)
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
I like David Lynch and I'm happy
that he found the desire to promote meditation. Maybe something will come of it.
Whether that is the case or not is probably based on how open he is to the roots
of the Movement and the range of the experiences of those who have created it,
as opposed to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to ramble, but there are days when the weirdass
things that spiritual traditions do to its followers just blow
my mind.
Unc
Your incredulity is mere smugness of an inner fanaticism with your
own
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find his movies to be very disturbing, to say the
least. Do you think anyone in the TMO has actually sat
down and watched his movies? Blue Velvet, Ereaserhead,
now there are two sattvic movies, ah?
Strangely easy
I've seen everything he's ever
done. Eraserhead is actually inspiring if you can grasp the surreal sense
of it. The person in the cold world gets warmth and light from the room
radiator. In the end he falls in.
- Original Message -
From: Peter
Sutphen
To:
off_world_beings wrote:
I think you need to answer the question
I asked several posts back about keeping
the purity of the teaching.
Yes, this is the Big Question. Around here, people
seem to have answered it in a number of ways:
1. No one I know wants to fiddle with the basic
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More seriously, I don't know the group, probably won't ever
because 1) as you said French and rock 'n roll just don't mix,
and 2) Bertrand Cantat managed to murder an actress I liked
who had all the looks and talent he
The trouble with this analysis is that
it's all black-and-white, no shades of gray.One of the problems
with cult-like thinking is that it often only sees in black and white. With
the program or off the program. Purity or impurity. Right technique or wrong
technique.Therefore when people
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In one sense, hearing stories like this is a bit liberating,
because you can't even resent the idiots who did this
or have any ill wishes towards them. Any ill-wishing
would be completely redundant and useless. To
I was fucking with you, dude. I know the group, and their
music.I think both are mediocre beyond belief, and thought that
longbefore the drug-addled leader of the band decided to beat hismovie
star girlfriend into a bloody pulp. I was trying to avoid saying so,
since you seem to like
That doesn't mean that I don't like you,
merely that I don't likethis particular group, and thus am not likely to be
able to recommendany group that is somewhat similar. Shoulda just said
so at the start...Right, just should have said so.
Simple. I appreciate that. Thanks for the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is one Nobel Prize
so much to ask from a child
after all I've done?
Good thing I'd swallowed my coffee before I read this.:-)
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
off_world_beings wrote:
I think you need to answer the question
I asked several posts back about keeping
the purity of the teaching.
Yes, this is the Big Question. Around here, people
seem to have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--Ken Wilber
Just another wuss who justifies believing he's right about
things. :-)
Try actually reading what he said, instead
of what you would like him to have said so
that you could continue to believe you're
you can't even resent the idiots who did thisor have any ill
wishes towards them.
-Because they actually weren't idiots.
Thinking that people are idiots is really just idiotic. Because on the one
hand there are no "people" at all. There are individuals. And on the other
to lump all
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
off_world_beings wrote:
I think you need to answer the question
I asked several posts back about keeping
the purity of the teaching.
Yes, this is the Big Question. Around here, people
seem to have
A valid point. I spent the day yesterday with a priest
friendwho was showing me around the parts of the Palais des Papesin
Avignon that the tourists can't get to. This involved the
secretpassages that the Popes used to get to their mistresses' roomsand
down to the torture chambers, where
On Jul 21, 2004, at 10:04 AM, Llundrub wrote:
---Actually your reification of 'cult-like' thinking takes place upon some assumed superior conceptual framework where 'cult-like' has some meaning. However, viewing the situation without labels one would immediately see that there is no TMO at all,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 21, 2005, at 8:50 AM, authfriend wrote:
The trouble with this analysis is that it's
all black-and-white, no shades of gray.
One of the problems with cult-like thinking is that it often only
sees in black and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you can't even resent the idiots who did this
or have any ill wishes towards them.
-Because they actually weren't idiots. Thinking that people are idiots
is
really just idiotic. Because on the one hand there
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
If the pure technique you wish to protect were
doing its job and offering its practitioners a suitable
pace of spiritual growth, how many people would be
even *interested* in seeing other teachers?
Suitable pace by
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A valid point. I spent the day yesterday with a priest friend
who was showing me around the parts of the Palais des Papes
in Avignon that the tourists can't get to. This involved the secret
passages that the Popes used
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
If the pure technique you wish to protect were
doing its job and offering its practitioners a
suitable
pace of spiritual growth, how many people would be
even
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think my friend is more enlightened than most of us. He meditates
TM regular, he is very devoted to the Ved and he encourage people to
start with TM. He has tried several times to apply for the TM-Sidhi-
course, they
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4703853.stm
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
*
The idea that the TMO couldn't evolve into the same self satisfied
and self
righteous institution as the Church is bogus because TMO is already
many
millions of light years ahead in terms of numbers and basic
influence than
Jesus was during his life. There is no certainty, but there is a
These quotes reminded me of different topics and people on FFL.
The game is, see what person(s) or topics flash to mind as you read
each quote (purely for entertainment purposes only)
A witty saying proves nothing.
I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord,
make my
off_world_beings wrote:
I think you need to answer the question
I asked several posts back about keeping
the purity of the teaching.
Patrick Gillam wrote:
Yes, this is the Big Question. Around here, people
seem to have answered it in a number of ways:
Judy Stein
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
IMO it is Ok even if Maharishi and the TMO feel that
I've heard another interpretation, of this notion, which Maharishi is
expressing, and that is:
The Soul Energy is above one's head, animates the body, from above
(Heaven); enters and radiates through the crown chakra..
Flying Sidhi, draws the soul energy down into the body(earth)ie:
bringing
What exactly is purity of the teaching? Go to see 5 different
Maharishi Jyotishis and you'll get 5 different readings using 5
different approaches, but if a jyotishi trained at maharishi jyotish
courses and using his training faithfully decides to stop giving the
right % of his revenues to the
---I'm not sure what is the difference between so-called established
religion and cults.
The difference ultimately between the TM movement, and the rest, is
that Maharishi believes that his teaching, which he received from
Guru Dev, was and is an evlivenment of the basis of all religions or
---Actually
your reification of 'cult-like' thinking takes place upon some assumed
superior conceptual framework where 'cult-like' has some meaning.
However, viewing the situation without labels one would immediately see that
there is no TMO at all, there are many diifferent
I'm
not a Buddhist per se, by the way. I'm not anything in particular per
se. Buddhism has for me the most resonance I've found in a major
spiritual path, but that's the extent of it.There is dogma in traditional
Buddhism I don't believe fora minute, never will, and won't ever feel bad
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lupidus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think my friend is more enlightened than most of us. He meditates
TM regular, he is very devoted to the Ved and he encourage people to
--This was lifted from: Path's to God, and the Language of
Nature...Which can be linked @:
http://vinyasi.mayashastra.org/essays/coorespondence/
The path of tamas, the death of death itself (the path of Shiva,
which is freedom from the wheel of necessity, or rebirths, and
freedom from
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One response that I did not list in my earlier post might be this:
5. I cannot say what is ultimate truth, nor will I take the word
of others for what is truth. Hence I cannot say whether the
purity of TM is
If the pure technique you wish to protect were
doing its job and offering its practitioners a
suitable
pace of spiritual growth, how many people would be
even *interested* in seeing other teachers?
Suitable pace by whose standard? Who decides
what is and is not suitable, and
recently relieved oftheir duties, initiations are pretty much dead,
enrollments at mum andother tmo institutions have been in decline for awhile
-- and all thisdecline while the founder is still alive. What will
happen when theprime source of inspiration in the tmo is gone and it's left
On Jul 21, 2004, at 12:46 PM, Llundrub wrote:
I don't think I ever used the words evil or hatred.
Selective memory perhaps?
The honest fact is that you have never really seen through my words to their essence which is the relativity of conceptualization in general.
Never? Seems you and
Moreover you're constantly putting on more makeup.
Constantly? How would you know? Could you quote me?
Maybe I was sitting here naked the whole time.
Nothing personal, but if we ever get into a discussion
I'm gonna stick with the mental image of you wearing
makeup, rather than the one of
On Jul 21, 2005, at 1:32 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Nothing personal, but if we ever get into a discussion
I'm gonna stick with the mental image of you wearing
makeup, rather than the one of you sitting there naked. :-)
And I do appreciate that. :-)
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL
Thats a onesided story. Obviously
the TMO must have strong reasons for not wanting him on the
course.And those reasons are valid, simply because the TMO has
them?---Like he isn't a 6.9 version enlightened synchophant of the 6th
ray, but a mere 2.4 verson quasi-awakened acolyte of the
I have heard you talk "about" various esoteric Buddhist topics, but
honestly from my perspective you seem to miss the points much of the time--and I
know lamas have told you this as well. Interesting concepts if that's what your
into (and I certainly respect your right to do that if you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What exactly is purity of the teaching? Go to see 5 different
Maharishi Jyotishis and you'll get 5 different readings using 5
different approaches, but if a jyotishi trained at maharishi jyotish
courses and using
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not saying that TMO will survive, but I think that if you think that it
cannot
survive and even grow then you're overlooking the basic irrational nature of
humans and the ability for memes to spread like chicken pox
While looking for somethign else, I stumbled
across the list below. It dovetails with a discussion
in another thread, so I thought I'd post it for the
Chick Power types in the crowd.
found at http://tinyurl.com/94b6u
108 Female Siddhas, Dakinis, Yoginis and Tantric Adepts
Recently a famous
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If the pure technique you wish to protect were
doing its job and offering its practitioners a
suitable
pace of spiritual growth, how many people would be
even *interested* in seeing other teachers?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've read one or two people here describe themselves
as tantrics. What do you mean when you say that?
No hidden agenda. Just want tantra defined by someone
who might be able to put it in context for me.
On Jul 21, 2004, at 1:37 PM, Llundrub wrote:
It's just part of the way I was trained but more importantly because it is something I find useful and practical.
What is? I don't get what youre refering to.
Checking ones motivation, ones own underlying motivation.
Therefore when
I've read one or two people here describe themselves
as tantrics. What do you mean when you say that?
No hidden agenda. Just want tantra defined by someone
who might be able to put it in context for me.
Thanks.
- Patrick Gillam
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've read one or two people here describe themselves
as tantrics. What do you mean when you say that?
No hidden agenda. Just want tantra defined by someone
who might be able to put it in context for me.
Patrick Gillam wrote:
I've read one or two people here describe themselves
as tantrics. What do you mean when you say that?
No hidden agenda. Just want tantra defined by someone
who might be able to put it in context for me.
Thanks.
- Patrick Gillam
It's often hard to put tantra into
--- Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've read one or two people here describe themselves
as tantrics. What do you mean when you say that?
No hidden agenda. Just want tantra defined by
someone
who might be able to put it in context for me.
Thanks.
- Patrick Gillam
TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've read one or two people here describe themselves
as tantrics. What do you mean when you say that?
No hidden agenda. Just want tantra defined by someone
who might be able to put it in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you haven't practice a real tantric sadhana, have you?
Sure I have, in the past. Mantras, yantras, formal
practices, direct transmission from the guru, the
whole bit. But that was then, this is now.
What you
L B Shriver wrote:
The Knowledge have actually been compromised
by the University. For example, the principle of
innocence in practice absolutely foundational
as far as I'm concernedwas completely trashed
by the practice of grading students on their
performance in the Domes, where
That was good writing Unc.
-My take. Tantrics are like TMers who
eschew any conventional notion of path or intermediary. Thus, if you have the
impulse to worship Mother Divine, you need not ask permission. They are not
necessarily TMers, but TMers can be tantrics. The basic notion
That's not what I said.
"I have heard you talk "about" various esoteric Buddhist topics, but honestly
from my perspective you seem to miss the points much of the time--and I know
lamas have told you this as well." is what I said.
But this isn't so. What esoteric
thing and what lama
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That was good writing Unc.
Just a rap, but thanks.
-My take. Tantrics are like TMers who eschew any conventional notion
of path or intermediary. Thus, if you have the impulse to worship Mother
Divine, you need not
OriginalMessage---
To:
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
From:
"Robert Gimbel" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's Methodology.
Seems to me, that everything goes in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not what I said. I have heard you talk about various
esoteric Buddhist topics, but honestly from my perspective you seem to
miss the points much of the time--and I know lamas have told you this
as well. is what I
-There is much resistance to light by the dark; or you could say,
between lower vibrations and higher vibrations; Spiritually means:
resistance of the ego to letting go.
Like the ego, which has to relinquish it's power and control, when
confronted by Being, or spiritual experience; certain
--There is a much light in the darkest valley; the light within...
By the same token, there is dark also, in high places...
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
There is just as
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Gillam
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 2:26 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Purity of the teaching (was Honest
answers)
L B Shriver wrote: The Knowledge have actually been
compromised by the University. For
---I agree with you: seems like you have to push the personal
envelope, and get out of the ego to experience Unity...
Another way to think of it, is that we all have to find our
own Christ Consciousness or Maharishi Consciousness or Buddah
Consciousness and so on...in order to complete our
TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you haven't practice a real tantric sadhana, have you?
Sure I have, in the past. Mantras, yantras, formal
practices, direct transmission from the guru, the
whole bit. But that was then,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--There is a much light in the darkest valley; the light within...
By the same token, there is dark also, in high places...
Sometimes the road leads through dark places
Sometimes the darkness is your friend
--- Bruce
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
