--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has nothing to do with rules per se but those activities that
will
support enlightened activity and realization. The vows are there
for
a reason, they are not just arbitrary. We might not like the
gaudy
sign that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and intentions
may help one be more sesnsitive. For example, thinking, It sounds
like he MAY be mad at something. Just in case, I will be careful not
to use
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'll try again, briefly. To laugh *at* someone is,
virtually by definition, an attack. Confirming that
one is laughing *at* somebody is therefore equivalent
to stating one's intention, so no minds need to be
read.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, why bother with what often/usually is perceived as an
attack, and then criticize for saying that's an attack?
I don't believe I
http://www.uibk.ac.at/c/cb/cb26/heim/theorie_raumfahrt/hqtforspacepropph
ysicsaip2005.pdf
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
Spare egg writes:
Of course, Barry has never denied his intent to laugh AT people.
Rather he has embraced and defended it. Seems a not very difficult
job of mind-reading to assume something, comment on that assumption,
and get CONFIRMATION of that assumption and therefore to continue to
assume
TorquiseB writes: snipped
It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.
The laughter is going to win. The clinging
to self is going to lose. That's just the
way the world works.
Tom T:
Of course and that is the real joke. No laughing at them, laughing at
the clinging to the idea that can not
Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
TorquiseB writes:
Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself
for once. What you *meant* by Let's focus on
substance was Let's all talk about what *I* want
to talk about, in the pseudointellectual way I like
to talk
On Jan 12, 2006, at 9:50 PM, Patrick Gillam wrote: I mean ultimately if you cannot perceive your consort as pure vision, i.e. as the Deity, the result is NOT going to be enlightenment. Vaj, I'm going to have to ask you to elaborate on this a bit. I can see how seeing one's lover as the
On Jan 13, 2006, at 3:15 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has nothing to do with rules per se but those activities that will support enlightened activity and realization. The vows are there for a reason, they are not just
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TorquiseB writes: snipped
It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.
The laughter is going to win. The clinging
to self is going to lose. That's just the
way the world works.
Tom T:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome to high voltage cause--effect. :-)
And welcome to being limited by what you choose to believe. :-)
IME the vows represent a transcendental morality, that is they
reflect important elements that can help or
On Jan 13, 2006, at 8:02 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Welcome to high voltage cause--effect. :-) And welcome to being limited by what you choose to believe. :-) IME the vows represent a transcendental morality, that is they reflect
Unattributed. From another list.WHAT are the Vedic creationists saying? They deny that different species of living beings, including humans, have evolved, or risen up, from simpler organisms, as Darwin claims. Instead, they claim that all species, including humans, have "devolved", or come down,
Full story at:http://www.flonnet.com/fl2301/stories/20060127003309700.htmOn Jan 13, 2006, at 8:20 AM, Vaj wrote: Unattributed. From another list.WHAT are the Vedic creationists saying? They deny that different species of living beings, including humans, have evolved, or risen up, from simpler
--- Vaj wrote:
Vaj wrote:
I mean ultimately if you cannot perceive your consort as pure
vision, i.e. as the Deity, the result is NOT going to be
enlightenment.
Without breaking any vows I think it's safe to say that since you
need to perfect the generation stage before perfecting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2. Is having an ellipsis hurled at you an attack?
No,
On Jan 13, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:--- Vaj wrote: Vaj wrote: I mean ultimately if you cannot perceive your consort as pure vision, i.e. as the Deity, the result is NOT going to be enlightenment. Without breaking any vows I think it's safe to say that since you need to perfect
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just received a catalog in the mail from MAPI. It sells organic
cotton clothing and
bedding and the brand is called Raam Raj clothing. In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://www.milliondollarhomepage.com/
Yeah, this got written up in Wired and other places.
It's just a Web page with a million pixels,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I believe that Barry has indicated that he believes that laughing
AT is good for the person being laughed at, or something along
those lines. He's even implied that he WAS attacking, but won't
quite own up to it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'll try again, briefly. To laugh *at* someone is,
virtually by definition, an attack. Confirming that
one is laughing *at* somebody is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
IME the vows represent a transcendental morality,
What's a transcendental morality? Seems like a
contradiction in terms, the transcendent being
beyond all distinctions, at least by any definition
I've ever encountered.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TorquiseB writes: snipped
It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.
The laughter is going to win. The
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Laughing at someone is always an attack,
virtually by definition. As I've noted
several times, however, that doesn't mean
that the person laughed at *feels* attacked.
You're conflating the perspective of the
attacker
On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:03 AM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip IME the vows represent a transcendental morality, What's a "transcendental morality"? Seems like a contradiction in terms, the transcendent being beyond all distinctions, at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Laughing at someone is always an attack,
virtually by definition. As I've noted
several times, however, that doesn't mean
that the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:03 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
IME the vows represent a transcendental morality,
What's a transcendental morality? Seems
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and intentions
may help one be more sesnsitive. For example, thinking, It sounds
On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:14 AM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:03 AM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip IME the vows represent a transcendental morality, What's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'll try again, briefly. To laugh *at* someone is,
virtually by definition, an attack. Confirming that
one is laughing *at* somebody is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I think it its a bogus term and concept. I have no desire to become
enlightened. (Think about it, desiring enlightenment is a
contradiction of terms.)
snip
OK, well thanks for clearing that up.
And as to your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just received a catalog in the mail from MAPI. It sells
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
TorquiseB writes:
Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself
for once. What you *meant* by Let's focus on
substance
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TorquiseB writes: snipped
It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.
The laughter is going to win. The
OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and
intentions may help one be more sesnsitive. For example,
thinking, It sounds like he MAY be mad at something. Just
in case, I will be careful not to use ambiguous language,
in case, I will be careful not or jokes that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:14 AM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
IME the vows represent a transcendental morality,
What's a transcendental morality? Seems like a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I think it its a bogus term and concept. I have no desire to become
enlightened. (Think about it, desiring enlightenment is a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and
intentions may help one be more sesnsitive. For example,
thinking, It sounds like he MAY be mad at something. Just
in case, I will be careful not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and
intentions may help one be more sesnsitive. For example,
thinking, It sounds like he MAY be mad at something. Just
in case, I will be careful not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's really funny for me right now is how everything is flipped
upside down and inside out. I have zero formal training in
self-inquiry, and asking myself who am I used to result in
nothing
but frustration and an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I think it its a bogus term and concept. I
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
TorquiseB writes:
Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself
for once. What you *meant* by Let's focus on
On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:35 AM, authfriend wrote:I don't believe you addressed my question.I have. Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be "transcendental," by definition--unless you're using a very different definition of the transcendent than any I've ever seen. Jnana is transcendental.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/9/06 7:29:33 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This guy needs to get back on his medication.
Sal
On Jan 8, 2006, at 9:21 PM, dhamiltony2k5 wrote:
FWD:
paste
Dear
When the TMO first started selling auyer vedic
products about 20 years ago, the first product they
sold was a rasayana called, Maharishi 1. Does
anybody know what it was made of? I know it contained
amalaki, but it also had other herbs in it. I found it
to to be very powerful. You used to mix it
MAPI phone people may be able to answer your question, because we'd have to know what they renamed it. Was that the liquid one with sugar in it? If so, I'm certain they still make that.Anyone who attended the original physicians course with Chopra will have the original lists (where many of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip great rap
So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who
have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether
it helps him or not, though...
I suspect it has the opposite
Sent recently by a Japanese friend:
Report: Yoga Stir Tempers in Norway Prison
-
Wednesday, August 3, 2005
(08-03) 13:07 PDT OSLO, Norway (AP) --
A Norwegian prison has stopped giving yoga sessions to inmates after finding
that some
of the prisoners became more aggressive and agitated, a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
TorquiseB writes:
Dude, why don't you try
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just surprised to see a TM-related item without pictures of
MMY. Perhaps MAPI has
been selling things without the photos for some time, but I never
noticed if they have.
Except for a small print return address
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip great rap
So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who
have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't
Mom, Myra Shimp Leedis stronger-- Happier etc.but its just now a short time remaining we believe however the cd's have helped . THANKS for bringing them there purchase for me us. .. I note I had the Amma group do thing for Mom as well just before she rapidly became physicly better. THANKS Tom
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,3605,1685534,00.html
Whats up doc?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:35 AM, authfriend wrote:
I don't believe you addressed my question.
I have.
Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be
transcendental, by definition--unless you're
using a very different
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we
who have
Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether
I seem to recall in SBAL(?) Maharishi commented on
psycho-analysis saying something like:
It's criminal to remind a man of his past.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
I think Maharishi 2 was the liquid one. Not as good as
Maha 1. I don't think they still sell Maharishi 1, but
I'll give MAPI a call.
--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MAPI phone people may be able to answer your
question, because we'd
have to know what they renamed it. Was that the
liquid
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip So, the same with akashanon. The more he
On Jan 13, 2006, at 12:03 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:35 AM, authfriend wrote: I don't believe you addressed my question. I have. Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be "transcendental," by
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
Oh, I thought Tom said we are all one. Are you contradicting
him? Or just not walking your talk?
What makes you think that one person's experiences,
even the experiences of enlightenment, have anything
to do with anyone else's? I make no such assumption.
Tom has had his own experiences, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip great rap
So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who
have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip great rap
So, the same with akashanon.
Jim Flanegin:
So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who have
Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether it
helps him or not, though...
Tom T:
Darn Jim you weren't supposed to tell him. He is such a perfect mirror
of how it used to be that is not hard to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
TorquiseB writes:
Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself
for once. What you *meant* by Let's focus on
substance
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, I thought Tom said we are all one. Are you contradicting
him? Or just not walking your talk?
What makes you think that one person's experiences,
even the experiences of enlightenment, have anything
to do with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The cool thing about akashanon's constant parrying and challenging
is that it strengthens the Awakening experience of those who are
challenged.
Its like this dude I encountered in the post office the other day,
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Flanegin:
So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who have
Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether it
helps him or not, though...
Tom T:
Darn
On Jan 13, 2006, at 11:08 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:So, the same with akashanon. He actually prefers "Akashic Moose".
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
Mahafuckyas. Now THAT cracked me right up!
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we
who have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know
whether it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The first is that I am
*immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own
experiences of enlightenment
But apparently not the There is no me-versus-them,
we-are-all one-experience...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 13, 2006, at 12:03 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:35 AM, authfriend wrote:
I don't believe you addressed my question.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
The first is that I am
*immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own
experiences of enlightenment
But apparently not the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Oh, I thought Tom said we are all one. Are you contradicting
him? Or just not walking your talk?
What makes you think that one person's experiences,
even the experiences of enlightenment, have anything
to do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
The first is that I am
*immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own
experiences of enlightenment
But apparently not the
On Jan 13, 2006, at 1:29 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 13, 2006, at 12:03 PM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:35 AM, authfriend wrote: I don't believe you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
I ever sought, any experience that could in any way be
descried as there is no me-vs-them, we are all one.
I suspect that this description has almost nothing to
do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
Mahafuckyas. Now THAT cracked me right
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
I ever sought, any experience that could in any way be
descried as there is no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
The first is that I am
*immensely* grateful that,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 13, 2006, at 1:29 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 13, 2006, at 12:03 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oxymoronic
eight morons? I have just counted five so far. :)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
I ever
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
I ever
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 13, 2006, at 11:08 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:
So, the same with akashanon.
He actually prefers Akashic Moose.
for dessert?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
A couple of question for you:
1. what is the natural dynamic being expressed as the result of the
above?
2. what is the
South-African Model Gang-Raped in Mumbai, India NDTV Correspondent Mumbai, December
31A 27-year-old South African model, who had come to Indias glamour capital in September to make a career in Bollywood, was allegedly gangraped by two people in a city hotel.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
A couple of question for you:
1.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
South-African Model Gang-Raped in Mumbai, India
Dude, in the future, please keep this shit to yourself. Thanks.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Râja Nader Râm, Jan 12th 2006:
His Divine Holiness Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
Wow. In both of those titles, only one word (the
family name, Nader or Mahesh) is not made up.
What is it about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Is Awakening something to be believed in? Does what
you believe in have anything to do with becoming
enlightened?
Yes, you must absolutely believe in the fact that you can and will
gain enlightenment, no matter
on 1/13/06 4:11 PM, jim_flanegin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
South-African Model Gang-Raped in Mumbai, India
Dude, in the future, please keep this shit to yourself. Thanks.
Jason, in case you're not aware,
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
