jstein wrote:
Barry. Read the context. This had to do with
something Rory said. I had to give some of
the backstory, or the connection wouldn't
have made any sense.
I'm sorry it embarrasses you, but them's
the breaks, I'm afraid.
It's almost always about Barry.
hetu-dvayaM hi cittasya vaasanaa ca samiiraNaH.
tayor vinaSTa ekasmiMs tad dvaav api vinashyataH.
tayor aadau **samiirasya jayaM** kuryaan naraH sadaa!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I heard SSRS use these very words.
I've often found that the highest practices are often the most simple
practices.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, martyboi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
I heard SSRS use these very words.
MMY says much the same thing, of course.
I've often found that the highest practices are often the most
simple
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I see her quite differently, now that my own anger/hurt/
blame around the TMO has been healed. Essentially in this
bodymind of awareness, she's a Dharmapala of practically
perfect diamond-mind!
Needless, perhaps,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a very odd resonance to it, however,
that Rory will probably find of interest.
A couple of years ago on alt.m.t, Barry took
to referring to me not by name but as the
pig. That was amusing, to say the least.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
There's a very odd resonance to it, however,
that Rory will probably find of interest.
A couple of years ago on alt.m.t, Barry took
to referring
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless, perhaps, to say, I'm thoroughly
enjoying this discussion. ;-)
There's a very odd resonance to it, however,
that Rory will probably find of interest.
I did, Judy; many thanks! A few additional comments
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Check out the link, Rory. Then click on the
Back button on the left of the page to see
what it's an image of (if you don't recognize
it).
I had discovered it while surfing one day
and thought it seemed a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not necessarily a good thing to confuse future-self and present-
self.
See, this was part of the Awakening for me -- That Awakening to
viscerally realize That is the container of time and space, of the
illusion of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
It's not necessarily a good thing to confuse future-self and
present- self.
See, this was part of the Awakening for me
I was thinking the it would be fun
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
It's not necessarily a good thing to confuse future-self and
present-
self.
See, this was part of the Awakening for me -- That Awakening to
viscerally
On Jun 7, 2007, at 9:19 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not my experience of non-proliferation of karmic winds at
all,
although your description was very colorful.
Thank you. I did not go into detail yet again on early
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing to keep in mind, particularly in a technique administered
to thousands or millions of people without personalized
instruction:
Let's just say that what you are saying is true. What is your
alternative? You have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
One thing to keep in mind, particularly in a technique administered
to thousands or millions of people without personalized
instruction:
Let's
On Jun 8, 2007, at 10:35 AM, boo_lives wrote:
Here is my theory on spiritual practice: Because we do it by
ourselves, like many other actions, like sleeping, waking,
breathing,
etc. it should be as simple and easy to learn and do as possible. In
my experience and reflection, that is how
--Right! Vaj's Guru, Norbu Rinpoche is not a great teaching Guru.
He only has a few hundred disciples and his best technique is
the Dance of the Vajra a type of dance done on top of a mandala to
the accompanyment of various Tibetan instruments.
Basically, Vaj reminds me of those Christian
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing to keep in mind, particularly in a technique
administered
to thousands or millions of people without personalized
instruction:
I don't know where you're getting this from; I certainly received all
the
--- Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know where you're getting this from; I
certainly received all
the personalized instruction I needed -- both
externally and (when
ready) internally. Did you not get the instruction
to leave when it
was time? :-)
Ha! The most difficult
On Jun 8, 2007, at 4:10 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing to keep in mind, particularly in a technique
administered
to thousands or millions of people without personalized
instruction:
I don't know where you're getting this
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not everyone is as fortunate as we have been Rory.
I did not get that instruction. I just knew it was...and left.
Yes, that's what I mean about getting that instruction. Much of
the really good stuff is on that level of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Great expression, though I'd like to add that the awakened hearts
of
others who don't participate actively in any spiritual practice or
meditation also find the Self friendly and blissful and attractive
and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you're likely skrying a future self of your own
intentionality, not necessarily her own.
Only insofar as everyone is my past-present-futureself. That
particular dharma holds no real futurebliss for this-individual me,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
Great expression, though I'd like to add that the awakened
hearts
of
others who don't participate actively in any spiritual practice
or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim: Let's just say that what you are saying is true. What is your
alternative? You have been at this same message for years, and
yet
never propose a workable alternative.
Jimbo! It sounds like you've not been listening!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
I think you're likely skrying a future self of your own
intentionality, not necessarily her own.
Only insofar as everyone is my past-present-futureself.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an important technique and taught in many of the higher
yogas
of both Hindu and Buddhist tantra.
It is not taught in TM or the TMSP. snip
It has been an automatic *result* of the TM/TMSP (and in the pathless
path
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an important technique and taught in many of the higher yogas
of both Hindu and Buddhist tantra.
It is not taught in TM or the TMSP.
I'm very pleased you understand this concept as many TM'ers are poorly
educated
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
This is an important technique and taught in many of the higher
yogas
of both Hindu and Buddhist tantra.
It is not taught in TM or the TMSP. snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
This is an important technique and taught in many of the higher
yogas
of both Hindu and Buddhist tantra.
It is not taught in TM or the TMSP. snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
This is an important technique and taught in many of the higher
yogas
of both Hindu and Buddhist tantra.
It is not taught in TM or the TMSP.
I'm
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be interesting if you could share your experience
here...vis-a-vis this subject of prana.
My experience has been that Prana is like the covering of the Bodily
Light; the more it is effortlessly surrendered into
On Jun 7, 2007, at 1:04 PM, BillyG. wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an important technique and taught in many of the higher
yogas
of both Hindu and Buddhist tantra.
It is not taught in TM or the TMSP.
I'm very pleased you understand
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
This is an important technique and taught in many of the higher
yogas
of both Hindu and Buddhist tantra.
It is not taught in TM or the TMSP. snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- BillyG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The prana is the vitality of the physical body and
the vehicle of the
soul (jivatman) which enables it to communicate with
the world, it's
not the soul per-se but the vehicle
On Jun 7, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
This is an important technique and taught in many of the higher
yogas
of both Hindu and Buddhist tantra.
It is not taught in TM or the TMSP. snip
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 7, 2007, at 1:10 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
This is an important technique and taught in many of the
higher
yogas
of both Hindu and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not my experience of non-proliferation of karmic winds at
all,
although your description was very colorful.
Thank you. I did not go into detail yet again on early experiences of
refinement/cessation of breath and the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, *its* real signs are indeed unmistakable once realized; the
Self
alone recognizes the Self. Oddly enough, no one else does, I find :-)
*L*L*L*
Great expression, though I'd like to add that the awakened hearts of
39 matches
Mail list logo
