off_world_beings wrote:
Your hero Bush is acting like a vermin caught in a corner.
Apparently the vermin caught in a corner are all the Democrats who are
now attempting to weasel their way out of taking responsibility for
their vote to go to war in Iraq. In my opinion, the heros are those
who
feste37 wrote:
Wouldn't you sooner have an atheist in charge than
this religious nut?
The U.S. economy is on the verge of booming again and we are winning
the war against the terrorists, but the fact that you haven't posted
any good news has already diminished what's left of your
feste37 wrote:
Wouldn't you sooner have an atheist in charge than
this religious nut?
The U.S. economy is on the verge of booming again and we are winning
the war against the terrorists, but the fact that you haven't posted
any good news has already diminished what's left of your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
off_world_beings wrote:
Your hero Bush is acting like a vermin caught in a corner.
Apparently the vermin caught in a corner are all the Democrats who
are
now attempting to weasel their way out of taking
shempmcgurk wrote:
What Judy and the rest of the Left don't seem to understand is that
a very large chunk of fence-sitters and undecided's get pushed into
the Bush/Republican camp each and every time a Cindy Sheehan or a
Michael Moore or an Al Franken open up their big yaps and speak
In a message dated 11/29/05 10:08:02 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, Reaganomics was such a failure that Bush Senior had to raise
taxes in order to offset some of the damage. Taxes will again have to be
raised to cope with the disaster that G. W. Bush's
In a message dated 11/30/05 8:30:05 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They
grew the economy causing even more revenue to be collected
in the long run.Prove it.
I don't have the stats for JFK but nobody disputes that JFK's
tax cuts stimulated the economy, causing
When Reagan took office government revenues were around 500 billion a
year , give or take about 50 billion. Before taxes were raised again the
economy had expanded and revenues increased to about 1 trillion during
the Reagan administration.
After his tax cuts, the country went into
Discussing politics is like
discussing Playboy Playmates.
- Original Message -
From: tazarmfune
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 9:39 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Where is Mr. M.DIXON?
When Reagan took office government
revenues were
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tazarmfune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When Reagan took office government revenues were around 500 billion a
year , give or take about 50 billion. Before taxes were raised again
the
economy had expanded and revenues increased to about 1 trillion
during
In a message dated 11/30/05 10:40:23 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steady growth? What reality are you living
in?Steady job losses for over 4 years.Only modern president to
have a net job losses in a term.
Yes steady growth, ranging from 3 to 4 % most of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/30/05 8:30:05 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They grew the economy causing even
more revenue
to be collected in the long run.
Prove it.
I don't have the stats
: [FairfieldLife] Re: Where is Mr. M.DIXON?
When Reagan took office government revenues were around 500
billion a
year , give or take about 50 billion. Before taxes were raised
again the
economy had expanded and revenues increased to about 1 trillion
during
the Reagan
In a message dated 11/30/05 12:02:42 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You
still haven't proven it. You didn't even prove it for JFK and Reagan,
whose tax cuts were far greater, percentage-wise, than Bush's. Also, over
what time-period were these previous tax
In a message dated 11/30/05 12:02:42 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You
still haven't proven it. You didn't even prove it for JFK and Reagan,
whose tax cuts were far greater, percentage-wise, than Bush's. Also, over
what time-period were these previous tax
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/30/05 12:02:42 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You still haven't proven it. You didn't even prove it for JFK and
Reagan, whose tax cuts were far greater, percentage-wise, than
TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Discussing politics is like discussing Playboy Playmates.
But you haven't *really* walked the Tantric path
until you've discussed politics *with* a Playboy
playmate. :-) I had the opportunity to do
: [FairfieldLife] Re: Where is Mr. M.DIXON?
When Reagan took office government revenues were around 500
billion a
year , give or take about 50 billion. Before taxes were raised
again the
economy had expanded and revenues increased to about 1
trillion
during
the Reagan
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/30/05 12:02:42 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You still haven't proven it. You didn't even prove it for JFK and
Reagan, whose tax cuts were far greater, percentage-wise, than
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/30/05 12:02:42 P.M. Central Standard
Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You still haven't proven it. You didn't even prove
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When Bush needs him?
Your hero Bush is acting like a vermin caught in a corner.
OffWorld
A review of the pre-9/11 presidential agenda indicates that as a
central
administration theme, W wanted to
Here are excerpts from an upcoming New Yorker article. Wouldn't you
sooner have an atheist in charge than this religious nut?
UP IN THE AIR
Where is the Iraq war headed next?
by SEYMOUR M. HERSH
Issue of 2005-12-05
A key element of the drawdown plans, not mentioned in the President's public
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/28/05 10:09:35 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When Bush needs him?
Your hero Bush is acting like a vermin caught in a corner.
OffWorld
He is? Has there ever been a time
In a message dated 11/29/05 9:49:29 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The
Curse of Cindy Sheehan triggered it.
Judy , you really think Cindy Sheehan has been a curse on
Bush? Honestly? I think Cindy Sheehan is a blessing on Bush. She is an extremist
and never
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/29/05 9:49:29 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Curse of Cindy Sheehan triggered it.
Judy , you really think Cindy Sheehan has been a curse on Bush?
Honestly? I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
terrorists hoping to prove Bush was wrong. As Rush Limbaugh has put
it for so many
years, Anything bad for America is Good news for the Democrats and
anything
good for America is usually bad for the Democrats.
So
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/29/05 9:49:29 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Curse of Cindy Sheehan triggered it.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/29/05 9:49:29 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Curse of Cindy Sheehan triggered it.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I think the public quite frankly is confused by the rhetoric
coming from the left that has attached their wagon to a victory by
the terrorists hoping to prove Bush was wrong.
http://tinyurl.com/aeeon
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/29/05 9:49:29 A.M. Central Standard
Time,
In a message dated 11/29/05 2:37:48 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As Rush
Limbaugh has put it for so many years, Anything bad for
America is Good news for the Democrats and anything good
for America is usually bad for the Democrats.So when
Clinton was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
No, the point is this, when Bush became President and put his
policies in effect, the Democrats resisted them so aggressively
predicting doom and gloom at every turn, that if the policies
succeeded, it made the Democrats
In a message dated 11/29/05 7:19:14 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You
mean, because we warned that Bush would be badfor the country before he
became president, we mustnot have had the interests of the country at
heart?
No, but he was elected and democrats
Democrats can make Bush look like a genius???
Miracle of miracles
I meanhim and his cronies cant
even do that.
Thats power dudetrue power!
Ha-ha
No, but he was elected and democrats have
no interest in seeing his policies work. When they do, it only proves
them
In a message dated 11/29/05 8:05:04 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Democrats can make
Bush look like a genius???
Miracle of
miracles
I mean…him and his
cronies can’t even do that….
That’s power
dude…true power! Ha-ha
Remember how Democrats
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/29/05 7:19:14 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You mean, because we warned that Bush would be bad
for the country before he became president, we must
not have had the interests
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/29/05 8:05:04 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Democrats can make Bush look like a genius???
Miracle of miracles
I meanâ¦him and his cronies canât even do thatâ¦.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
terrorists hoping to prove Bush was wrong. As Rush Limbaugh has
put
it for so many
years, Anything bad for America is Good news for the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I think the public quite frankly is confused by the rhetoric
coming from the left that has attached their wagon to a victory by
the terrorists
Actually, Reaganomics was such a failure that Bush Senior had to raise taxes
in order to offset some of the damage. Taxes will again have to be raised to
cope with the disaster that G. W. Bush's policies have led to.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/29/05 7:19:14 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You mean, because we warned that Bush would be bad
for the country before he became president, we must
not have had the interests
42 matches
Mail list logo
