--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It has nothing to do with rules per se but those activities that
will
> support enlightened activity and realization. The vows are there
for
> a reason, they are not just arbitrary. We might not like the
gaudy
> sign
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and intentions
> may help one be more sesnsitive. For example, thinking, "It sounds
> like he MAY be mad at something. Just in case, I will be careful not
> to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I'll try again, briefly. To laugh *at* someone is,
> virtually by definition, an attack. Confirming that
> one is laughing *at* somebody is therefore equivalent
> to stating one's intention, so no minds need to be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > But, why bother with what often/usually is perceived as an
> > attack, and then criticize for saying "that's an attack?"
>
> I don'
http://www.uibk.ac.at/c/cb/cb26/heim/theorie_raumfahrt/hqtforspacepropph
ysicsaip2005.pdf
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWol
Spare egg writes:
Of course, Barry has never denied his intent to laugh AT people.
Rather he has embraced and defended it. Seems a not very difficult
job of mind-reading to assume something, comment on that assumption,
and get CONFIRMATION of that assumption and therefore to continue to
assume
TorquiseB writes: snipped
It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.
The laughter is going to win. The clinging
to self is going to lose. That's just the
way the world works.
Tom T:
Of course and that is the real joke. No laughing at them, laughing at
the clinging to the idea that can not b
Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
TorquiseB writes:
Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself
for once. What you *meant* by "Let's focus on
substance" was "Let's all talk about what *I* want
to talk about, in the pseudointellectual way I like
to talk ab
On Jan 12, 2006, at 9:50 PM, Patrick Gillam wrote: I mean ultimately if you cannot perceive your consort as pure vision, i.e. as the Deity, the result is NOT going to be enlightenment. Vaj, I'm going to have to ask you to elaborate on this a bit. I can see how seeing one's lover as the De
On Jan 13, 2006, at 3:15 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It has nothing to do with rules per se but those activities that will support enlightened activity and realization. The vows are there for a reason, they are not just arbitrar
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TorquiseB writes: snipped
> It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.
>
> The laughter is going to win. The clinging
> to self is going to lose. That's just the
> way the world works.
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Welcome to high voltage cause-&-effect. :-)
> >
> > And welcome to being limited by what you choose to believe. :-)
>
> IME the vows represent a transcendental morality, that is they
> reflect important elements th
On Jan 13, 2006, at 8:02 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Welcome to high voltage cause-&-effect. :-) And welcome to being limited by what you choose to believe. :-) IME the vows represent a transcendental morality, that is they refle
Unattributed. From another list.WHAT are the Vedic creationists saying? They deny that different species of living beings, including humans, have evolved, or risen up, from simpler organisms, as Darwin claims. Instead, they claim that all species, including humans, have "devolved", or come down,
Full story at:http://www.flonnet.com/fl2301/stories/20060127003309700.htmOn Jan 13, 2006, at 8:20 AM, Vaj wrote: Unattributed. From another list.WHAT are the Vedic creationists saying? They deny that different species of living beings, including humans, have evolved, or risen up, from simpler org
--- Vaj wrote:
>
> >> Vaj wrote:
> >> I mean ultimately if you cannot perceive your consort as pure
> >> vision, i.e. as the Deity, the result is NOT going to be
> >> enlightenment.
> >>
>
> Without breaking any vows I think it's safe to say that since you
> need to perfect the generation stage
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > 2. Is having an ellipsis hurled at you
On Jan 13, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:--- Vaj wrote: Vaj wrote: I mean ultimately if you cannot perceive your consort as pure vision, i.e. as the Deity, the result is NOT going to be enlightenment. Without breaking any vows I think it's safe to say that since you need to perfect
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I just received a catalog in the mail from MAPI. It sells organic
> cotton clothing and
> > bedding and the brand is called Raam
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > http://www.milliondollarhomepage.com/
>
> Yeah, this got written up in Wired and other places.
> It's just a Web page with a mil
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe that Barry has indicated that he believes that laughing
> AT is good for the person being laughed at, or something along
> those lines. He's even implied that he WAS attacking, but won't
> quite own up to it e
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I'll try again, briefly. To laugh *at* someone is,
> > virtually by definition, an attack. Confirming that
> > one is laughing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IME the vows represent a transcendental morality,
What's a "transcendental morality"? Seems like a
contradiction in terms, the transcendent being
beyond all distinctions, at least by any definition
I've ever encountered.
th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In
> FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > TorquiseB writes: snipped
> > It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.
> >
> > The laughter is going to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Laughing at someone is always an attack,
> virtually by definition. As I've noted
> several times, however, that doesn't mean
> that the person laughed at *feels* attacked.
> You're conflating the perspective of the
On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:03 AM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IME the vows represent a transcendental morality, What's a "transcendental morality"? Seems like a contradiction in terms, the transcendent being beyond all distinctions, at leas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > Laughing at someone is always an attack,
> > virtually by definition. As I've noted
> > several times, however, that doesn't mean
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:03 AM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> IME the vows represent a transcendental morality,
> >>
> >
> > What's a "transcendent
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and intentions
> > may help one be more sesnsitive. For example, thinking,
On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:14 AM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:03 AM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IME the vows represent a transcendental morality, What's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I'll try again, briefly. To laugh *at* someone is,
> > virtually by definition, an attack. Confirming that
> > one is laughing *
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I think it its a bogus term and concept. I have no desire to become
> "enlightened". (Think about it, desiring "enlightenment" is a
> contradiction of terms.)
OK, well thanks for clearing that up.
And as to your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I just received a catalog in the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
>
> TorquiseB writes:
> Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself
> for once. What you *meant* by "Let's focus on
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In
> FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > TorquiseB writes: snipped
> > It's ALL very funny, in a weird sort of way.
> >
> > The laughter is going to
> > > OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and
> > > intentions may help one be more sesnsitive. For example,
> > > thinking, "It sounds like he MAY be mad at something. Just
> > > in case, I will be careful not to use ambiguous language,
> > > in case, I will be careful not or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:14 AM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IME the vows represent a transcendental morality,
> >>>
> >>> What's a "transcendental mora
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I think it its a bogus term and concept. I have no desire to become
> > "enlightened". (Think about it, desiring "enlightenme
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and
> > > > intentions may help one be more sesnsitive. For example,
> > > > thinking, "It sounds like he MAY be mad at something. Just
> > > > in case, I wi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > > > OTOT, a working set of hypotheses of a persons moods and
> > > > intentions may help one be more sesnsitive. For example,
> > > > thinking, "It sounds like he MAY be mad at something. Just
> > > > in case, I w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What's really funny for me right now is how everything is flipped
> upside down and inside out. I have zero formal training in
> self-inquiry, and asking myself "who am I" used to result in
nothing
> but frustrat
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think it its a bogus ter
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
>
> TorquiseB writes:
> Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself
> for once. What you *meant* by "Let's focus on
On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:35 AM, authfriend wrote:I don't believe you addressed my question.I have. Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be "transcendental," by definition--unless you're using a very different definition of the transcendent than any I've ever seen. Jnana is transcendental.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 1/9/06 7:29:33 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> This guy needs to get back on his medication.
>
> Sal
>
>
> On Jan 8, 2006, at 9:21 PM, dhamiltony2k5 wrote:
>
> > FWD:
> >
When the TMO first started selling auyer vedic
products about 20 years ago, the first product they
sold was a rasayana called, "Maharishi 1". Does
anybody know what it was made of? I know it contained
amalaki, but it also had other herbs in it. I found it
to to be very powerful. You used to mix it
MAPI phone people may be able to answer your question, because we'd have to know what they renamed it. Was that the liquid one with sugar in it? If so, I'm certain they still make that.Anyone who attended the original physicians course with Chopra will have the original lists (where many of the r
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who
> have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether
> it helps him or not, though...
I suspect it has the opposite effect, bu
Sent recently by a Japanese friend:
Report: Yoga Stir Tempers in Norway Prison
-
Wednesday, August 3, 2005
(08-03) 13:07 PDT OSLO, Norway (AP) --
A Norwegian prison has stopped giving yoga sessions to inmates after finding
that some
of the prisoners became more aggressive and agitated, a ne
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In
> FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
> >
> > TorquiseB writes:
> > Du
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was just surprised to see a TM-related item without pictures of
MMY. Perhaps MAPI has
> been selling things without the photos for some time, but I never
noticed if they have.
> Except for a small print return
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who
> > have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I d
Mom, Myra Shimp Leed is stronger-- Happier etc. but its just now a short time remaining we believe however the cd's have helped . THANKS for bringing them & there purchase for me us. .. I note I had the Amma group do thing for Mom as well just before & she rapidly became physicly better. THANK
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/story/0,3605,1685534,00.html
Whats up doc?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://us.click.yahoo.com/lMct6A/Vp3LAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
-
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:35 AM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > I don't believe you addressed my question.
>
> I have.
>
> >
> > Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be
> > "transcendental," by definition--unless you're
> > us
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we
who have
> > Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know
I seem to recall in SBAL(?) Maharishi commented on
psycho-analysis saying something like:
It's criminal to remind a man of his past.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
http://u
I think Maharishi 2 was the liquid one. Not as good as
Maha 1. I don't think they still sell Maharishi 1, but
I'll give MAPI a call.
--- Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MAPI phone people may be able to answer your
> question, because we'd
> have to know what they renamed it. Was that the
> liq
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > So, the same with akashanon. The
On Jan 13, 2006, at 12:03 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:35 AM, authfriend wrote: I don't believe you addressed my question. I have. Distinctions, no matter how fine, cannot be "transcendental," by definition-
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yaho
> Oh, I thought Tom said we are all one. Are you contradicting
> him? Or just not walking your talk?
What makes you think that one person's experiences,
even the experiences of enlightenment, have anything
to do with anyone else's? I make no such assumption.
Tom has had his own experiences, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who
> > have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > So, the same with
Jim Flanegin:
So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who have
Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether it
helps him or not, though...
Tom T:
Darn Jim you weren't supposed to tell him. He is such a perfect mirror
of how it used to be that is not hard to r
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
"tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Akashanon writes: I have said, 'hey guys, lets focus on substance.'
>
> TorquiseB writes:
> Dude, why don't you try being honest with yourself
> for once. What you *meant* by "Let's focus on
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Oh, I thought Tom said we are all one. Are you contradicting
> > him? Or just not walking your talk?
>
> What makes you think that one person's experiences,
> even the experiences of enlightenment, have anything
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> The cool thing about akashanon's constant parrying and challenging
> is that it strengthens the Awakening experience of those who are
> challenged.
>
> Its like this dude I encountered in the post office the ot
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jim Flanegin:
> So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we who have
> Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't know whether it
> helps him or not, though...
>
> Tom
On Jan 13, 2006, at 11:08 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:So, the same with akashanon. He actually prefers "Akashic Moose".
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
> mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
"Mahafuckyas. Now THAT cracked me right up!
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > So, the same with akashanon. The more he challenges what we
> who have Awakened express, the stronger it gets. I don't k
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first is that I am
> *immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own
> experiences of enlightenment
But apparently not the "There is no me-versus-them,
we-are-all one"-experience...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 13, 2006, at 12:03 PM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:35 AM, authfriend wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> I don't believe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The first is that I am
> > *immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own
> > experiences of enlightenment
>
> But appare
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > Oh, I thought Tom said we are all one. Are you contradicting
> > him? Or just not walking your talk?
>
> What makes you think that one person's experiences,
> even the experiences of enlightenment, have anything
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroup
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > The first is that I am
> > *immensely* grateful that, unlike them, I have had my own
> > experiences of enlightenment
>
> But apparen
On Jan 13, 2006, at 1:29 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 13, 2006, at 12:03 PM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 13, 2006, at 10:35 AM, authfriend wrote: I don't believe y
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
> I ever sought, any experience that could in any way be
> descried as "there is no me-vs-them, we are all one."
>
> I suspect that this description has almost nothing t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
> > mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
>
> "Mahafuckyas. Now THAT
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > But as it turns out I have neither had, nor have
> > I ever sought, any experience that could in any way be
> > descried as "there is n
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > The first is that I am
> > > *immensely* grat
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 13, 2006, at 1:29 PM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jan 13, 2006, at 12:03 PM, authfriend wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> --- In FairfieldL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"oxymoronic"
eight morons? I have just counted five so far. :)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > But as it turns out I have neither had, nor h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, a_non_moose_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > But as it turns out I have neither had, nor hav
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 13, 2006, at 11:08 AM, jim_flanegin wrote:
>
> > So, the same with akashanon.
>
> He actually prefers "Akashic Moose".
>
for dessert?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Jo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
> mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
>
A couple of question for you:
1. what is the natural dynamic being expressed as the result of the
above?
2. what
South-African Model Gang-Raped in Mumbai, India NDTV Correspondent Mumbai, December
31A 27-year-old South African model, who had come to Indias glamour capital in September to make a career in Bollywood, was allegedly gangraped by two people in a city hotel.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Never a dull moment in MahaRicky's Yahoovad Gita, where the
> > mahafuckyas flow fast and furious.
> >
> A couple of questio
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Never a dull moment in MahaR
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Never a dull moment in Mah
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> South-African Model Gang-Raped in Mumbai, India
>
Dude, in the future, please keep this shit to yourself. Thanks.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---
TurquoiseB wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>
>>Râja Nader Râm, Jan 12th 2006:
>>
>>His Divine Holiness Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
>>
>>
>
>Wow. In both of those titles, only one word (the
>family name, Nader or Mahesh) is not made up.
>W
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Is Awakening something to be "believed in"? Does what
> you believe in have anything to do with becoming
> enlightened?
Yes, you must absolutely believe in the fact that you can and will
gain enlightenment, no matt
on 1/13/06 4:11 PM, jim_flanegin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> South-African Model Gang-Raped in Mumbai, India
>>
> Dude, in the future, please keep this shit to yourself. Thanks.
Jason, in case you're no
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo