[Finale] Measure number regions bug

Hi all, Working in FinWin2011. I've got a piece with several measure number regions, including a few bars that are excluded from numbering -- either through measure attributes, or because they sit in between defined regions. I'm finding that when I do something like change a key signature or

Re: [Finale] Measure number regions bug

This bug is related to the “include in measure numbering” measure attribute, not the measure number regions. This affects many tools, so what I suggest is to NOT unclick “include in measure numbering” until you are ready to format and print. Christopher > On Nov 17, 2015, at 6:47 PM, Aaron

Re: [Finale] Measure number regions bug

The fix is to change display measure numbers to "actual" instead of "defined" within the preferences. Let me know if you have any further questions. Steve > On Nov 17, 2015, at 5:45 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote: > > Hi all, > > Working in FinWin2011. I've got a piece with

Re: [Finale] Measure number regions bug

Thanks to all -- not ideal solutions, but at least they let me get my work done. Aaron. On 11/17/2015 6:54 PM, Christopher Smith wrote: > This bug is related to the “include in measure numbering” measure > attribute, not the measure number regions. This affects many tools, so what I >

[Finale] Fw: Key tool bug [Incident: 140421-000311]

Problem NOT solved in FM2014b Klaus - Forwarded Message - From: MakeMusic Customer Support makemu...@mailwc.custhelp.com To: yorkmaster...@yahoo.com Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 9:10 AM Subject: Key tool bug [Incident: 140421-000311] Key tool bug Has your issue been

Re: [Finale] Bill Duncan Font bug in 2012 - now fixed

in order to edit them stops at #255. I'm a bit confused here. I understand the fact that the 2012 FAN editor doesn't support characters above 255, and that's a bug in Finale 2012 (since they didn't expand the editor to allow the Unicode range). But characters occupying slots 257 and 259 would

Re: [Finale] Bill Duncan Font bug in 2012

are in spaces 257 and 259, and the grid that Finale shows where such things can be accessed in order to edit them stops at #255. I'm a bit confused here. I understand the fact that the 2012 FAN editor doesn't support characters above 255, and that's a bug in Finale 2012 (since they didn't

Re: [Finale] Bill Duncan Font bug in 2012

stops at #255. I'm a bit confused here. I understand the fact that the 2012 FAN editor doesn't support characters above 255, and that's a bug in Finale 2012 (since they didn't expand the editor to allow the Unicode range). But characters occupying slots 257 and 259 would NOT be possible

Re: [Finale] Bill Duncan Font bug in 2012

...@comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2011 2:37 PM To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: Re: [Finale] Bill Duncan Font bug in 2012 Dear Jari, In order to explore this discrepancy, I opened Finale 2011 and looked for the problem symbols in the FAN editor. Lo and behold, they appear in slots 213 and 218

Re: [Finale] Bill Duncan Font bug in 2012

From: finale-boun...@shsu.edu [finale-boun...@shsu.edu] On Behalf Of Chuck Israels [cisra...@comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2011 2:37 PM To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: Re: [Finale] Bill Duncan Font bug in 2012 Dear Jari, In order to explore this discrepancy

[Finale] Bill Duncan Font bug in 2012

There are two essential (to me) symbols in Bill Duncan's fonts for which one cannot adjust the FAN files, because the symbols (the small and large slashes for rhythmic notation) are in slots that are currently not supported in Finale 2012. The symbols are in spaces 257 and 259, and the grid

Re: [Finale] Bill Duncan Font bug in 2012

I haven't seen any major issues with the articulations font and 2012 finale. Some really old files that seem to use the BDFont (maestro) were messed up for me. Did you manually move all the FAN files into the Finale 2012 folders? Sent from my iSomething -- Eric Dannewitz Musician/Polymath/Evil

Re: [Finale] Bill Duncan Font bug in 2012

Hi Eric, Yes, the appropriate FAN files have been moved into the right place, but there is a real bug, acknowledged by MM. I have had a message from them that the right people at MM are working on it, so I am hopeful. Thanks, Chuck Sent from my iPhone On Oct 14, 2011, at 8:16 AM, Eric

[Finale] Is this a bug? (Fin08 WinXP)

Enter a single note in speedy, switch to a different open running program window (alt-tab or click on different window), switch back to Finale, enter the next single note in the measure, it creates two notes (a chord instead of just the single note you enter) comprised of the note you just entered

Re: [Finale] Is this a bug? (Fin08 WinXP)

toronado...@gmail.com wrote: Enter a single note in speedy, switch to a different open running program window (alt-tab or click on different window), switch back to Finale, enter the next single note in the measure, it creates two notes (a chord instead of just the single note you enter)

Re: [Finale] Is this a bug? (Fin08 WinXP)

On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Noel Stoutenburg mjol...@ticnet.comwrote: toronado...@gmail.com wrote: Enter a single note in speedy, switch to a different open running program window (alt-tab or click on different window), switch back to Finale, enter the next single note in the measure,

Re: [Finale] Is this a bug? (Fin08 WinXP)

toronado...@gmail.com wrote: Finale 2008a, Windows XP Home Sorry, you had it in the subject line, and for some reason I missed it. I'm not sure why this is happening. As long as I've been using Finale, the default behavior has been to advance the cursor to the next position after

[Finale] Speedy Enharmonic Flip bug is back and sneakier now in Chromatic Tranposition

That goddamned 9 enharmonic flip bug was never properly fixed in Speedy. It reaches out and screws things up from beyond the grave like an ancient Sumerian curse. Here's how to do it: Open a new file using the Setup Wizard. Add Bb clarinet. Leave everything else blank or default. Switch

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

Richard Smith wrote: John Howell wrote: I do hate the automatic justification feature, but I seem to be the only one who does. [snip] But, I suggest working with the auto justification for a while first. Once you get a feel for what it's doing, you'll feel like you are in control again

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

On 14.03.2008 dhbailey wrote: I like the page layout features in Sibelius a bit better than Finale's, but only by a small margin. I hate the auto-justification aspect of either program (the space systems evenly feature of Finale), preferring to be in control of the entire page myself. I

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

At 12:52 PM -0400 3/11/08, Darcy James Argue wrote: Hi Johannes, So far, I only have one client who insists on Sibelius, so I am still learning the ropes. (I used to be pretty good with SIb 1.4, but obviously a lot has changed since then!) I will definitely post about my experience with Sib

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

John Howell wrote: I do hate the automatic justification feature, but I seem to be the only one who does. Filtering seems to be a majorly useful feature, but I haven't figured it out either. It's like anything else: What you use regularly you learn to use efficiently. What you

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

I will admit that slurs in Sibelius 5 do need improvement. Especially ties over system breaks and grabbing certain areas of the arc for adjusting. I can never find those little handles. But in the time I've been working in S5, I spend WAY LESS time mucking around adjusting slurs than I

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

At 8:04 AM -0700 3/12/08, ThomaStudios wrote: I will admit that slurs in Sibelius 5 do need improvement. Especially ties over system breaks and grabbing certain areas of the arc for adjusting. I can never find those little handles. As far as I can tell, you can grab them anyplace along the

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

John, My issues with ties over system breaks are that if you move one side, say the end of a system, the other half at the beginning of the system also moves, dependent on the first half. Same is true for moving the 2nd half. They don't seem to be independent of one another. The manual

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

As far as I can tell, Sibelius slurs have just three control points -- in other words, you can only adjust the distance of the tips from the noteheads and the size of the arc. You can't really adjust the contour of the arc at all. This is. Not. Acceptable. Finale's slurs have five control

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

On Mar 12, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote: As far as I can tell, Sibelius slurs have just three control points -- in other words, you can only adjust the distance of the tips from the noteheads and the size of the arc. You can't really adjust the contour of the arc at all. This

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

Darcy, I don't know this problem, so I can't help to solve it. But here's another way to edit the text that might work better: select it (by single click) and type F2 to get the text caret. Andrew On 11/03/2008, Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Yes, I know I should

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

Darcy James Argue wrote: Hi all, Yes, I know I should actually join the Sibelius list and ask it over there, but I haven't gotten around to doing so yet, and the Sib users here are, so far, very knowledgeable and helpful, so... I am having a recurring problem with Sibelius where it will

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

On 10 Mar 2008 at 23:58, Darcy James Argue wrote: I am having a recurring problem with Sibelius where it will periodically refuse to allow me to edit text. Double-clicking on a bit of expression, technique, or title text normally brings up the insertion point, but instead what happens

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

Hi Darcy, I don't have the answer, however, since you seem to be using Sibelius now, I'd love to hear your experience and in depth comparison. Johannes -- http://www.musikmanufaktur.com http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de ___ Finale mailing list

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

At 11:58 PM -0400 3/10/08, Darcy James Argue wrote: Hi all, Yes, I know I should actually join the Sibelius list and ask it over there, but I haven't gotten around to doing so yet, and the Sib users here are, so far, very knowledgeable and helpful, so... I am having a recurring problem with

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

Hi Johannes, So far, I only have one client who insists on Sibelius, so I am still learning the ropes. (I used to be pretty good with SIb 1.4, but obviously a lot has changed since then!) I will definitely post about my experience with Sib once I have a better handle on the program. So

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

Just another passing question on Sib. 5 (OS 10.4.11), I want to change (edit) note heads from normal to diamonds for a Handbell score. I followed the instructions (in the Edit Note heads dialog box), I think, but so far, can not get them to change. Anyone else with the issue or solutions?

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

Dean M. Estabrook wrote: Just another passing question on Sib. 5 (OS 10.4.11), I want to change (edit) note heads from normal to diamonds for a Handbell score. I followed the instructions (in the Edit Note heads dialog box), I think, but so far, can not get them to change. Anyone else with

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

Darcy, This pretty much parallels my experience with Sibelius 5. I started using it last October for simple student-related projects, and then in January for my first professional job. And most of that initial time was saying things like 'wow, that's really easy'; 'how simple it that'

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

Good question. They are normal, and I couldn't edit them anyway. However, just by snooping around the help doc, I came across a paragraph much earlier in the info inre changing note heads, not editing them. So, as instructed, I went through the Properties Window, where, in fact, it is

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

You can change notehead from the Properties panel, very easily. You can even make new notehead shapes and they appear in this window instantly. HTH. J D Thomas ThomaStudios On Mar 11, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote: Just another passing question on Sib. 5 (OS 10.4.11), I

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

I wouldn't go so far as saying Sibelius's deficiencies are no big deal -- to name just one issue, the inability to get consistent positioning for straight gliss lines (they cannot be reliably copied, and manually adjusting them is an incredible pain -- and it's just a LINE, fercrissakes,

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

Thanks. Yeah, I sort of stumbled upon that process. Works fine. Dean On Mar 11, 2008, at 11:04 AM, ThomaStudios wrote: You can change notehead from the Properties panel, very easily. You can even make new notehead shapes and they appear in this window instantly. HTH. J D Thomas

Re: [Finale] TAN: Annoying Sibelius bug

Hi Darcy, I don't have any help for your text problem, but you should post that to the Sibelius List, http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sibelius-list/ Daniel Spreadbury from Sibelius monitors that list and knows every bug and other intimate detail of Sibelius. He also prefers to work on a

Re: [Finale] FinMac2008 - duplicate expressions bug

Darcy James Argue / 07.9.16 / 4:44 PM wrote: In FinMac2008, in the Expression Selection dialog box, clicking Duplicate creates TWO duplicate copies. I can't reproduce this, but then FinMac2k8 seems to suffer from a lot of intermittent problems. -- - Hiro Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music,

Re: [Finale] FinMac2008 - duplicate expressions bug

This also happens in 2k7. Hard to reproduce 100% of the time. Quitting Finale and then restarting SOMETIMES cures the problem for a little while. Steve Darcy James Argue / 07.9.16 / 4:44 PM wrote: In FinMac2008, in the Expression Selection dialog box, clicking Duplicate creates TWO

Re: [Finale] FinMac2008 - duplicate expressions bug

Actually, now that you mention it, I sometimes get two things happening as if I clicked a box twice, especially in my browser, Firefox. I attributed it to a dirty mouse button that was giving me two clicks when I only thought I clicked once. That might be it. christopher On 17-Sep-07, at

Re: [Finale] FinMac2008 - duplicate expressions bug

On 17-Sep-07, at 1:43 PM, A-NO-NE Music wrote: Darcy James Argue / 07.9.16 / 4:44 PM wrote: In FinMac2008, in the Expression Selection dialog box, clicking Duplicate creates TWO duplicate copies. I can't reproduce this, but then FinMac2k8 seems to suffer from a lot of intermittent

Re: [Finale] FinMac2008 - duplicate expressions bug

Hey Chris, Nope, this is definitely a Finale bug. I (inadvertently) fixed it by moving the bottom expression in my list up one position. I should mention that when I was getting the duplicate expressions, they would appear just *above* the bottom item in the Expression Selection box

Re: [Finale] FinMac2008 - duplicate expressions bug

I've seen it as well in FinMac 2k7. I think it went away in a different file or after restarting. Did you happen to use TGTools to reorder the list? I thought that might have something to do with it. -Randolph Peters Hey Chris, Nope, this is definitely a Finale bug. I (inadvertently) fixed

Re: [Finale] FinMac2008 - duplicate expressions bug

the list? I thought that might have something to do with it. -Randolph Peters Hey Chris, Nope, this is definitely a Finale bug. I (inadvertently) fixed it by moving the bottom expression in my list up one position. I should mention that when I was getting the duplicate expressions

[Finale] FinMac2008 - duplicate expressions bug

In FinMac2008, in the Expression Selection dialog box, clicking Duplicate creates TWO duplicate copies. Cheers, - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooklyn, NY ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Re: [Finale] 2k8 page layout bug update

On Aug 14, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Chuck Israels wrote: I'm not sure - I think this method might avoid the problem. An 85 evpu staff height equals an 88% reduction. I could try that. When I get a chance to experiment, I'll report back. Communication with the MM support person suggested that

[Finale] 2k8 page layout bug

There is a bug in the 2008 page format for parts dialog. If you define a staff reduction (I use 88%) and then set a distance between staves for parts, each part in succession has that distance further reduced. The placement for the top staff remains correct. Only the between staff

RE: [Finale] 2k8 page layout bug

Gee, thanks, Chuck... ;-) From: Chuck Israels Sent: Tue 14-Aug-07 12:46 To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: [Finale] 2k8 page layout bug There is a bug in the 2008 page format for parts dialog. If you define a staff reduction (I use 88%) and then set a distance between staves for parts, each

Re: [Finale] 2k8 page layout bug

:46 To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: [Finale] 2k8 page layout bug There is a bug in the 2008 page format for parts dialog. If you define a staff reduction (I use 88%) and then set a distance between staves for parts, each part in succession has that distance further reduced. The placement

Re: [Finale] 2k8 page layout bug

Hey Chuck, Just to eliminate the obvious -- you don't have Space Systems Evenly checked by any chance? Cheers, - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooklyn, NY On 14 Aug 2007, at 12:46 PM, Chuck Israels wrote: There is a bug in the 2008 page format for parts dialog. If you define a staff

Re: [Finale] 2k8 page layout bug

Hi Darcy, No, that's not the issue. And it's just crazy. On a big band chart I am now working on, some parts have the defined distance (240 evpus), and others have 88 evpus, or 36 evpus. Makes no sense to me, and MM support could only relate it to the fact that there is a staff

Re: [Finale] 2k8 page layout bug

Does it still happen if you use Staff Height instead of Scale System? Cheers, - Darcy - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brooklyn, NY On 14 Aug 2007, at 3:23 PM, Chuck Israels wrote: Hi Darcy, No, that's not the issue. And it's just crazy. On a big band chart I am now working on, some parts have

RE: [Finale] 2k8 page layout bug

. On the other hand Richard Yates -Original Message- From: Chuck Israels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 12:24 PM To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: Re: [Finale] 2k8 page layout bug Hi Darcy, No, that's not the issue. And it's just crazy. On a big band chart I

[Finale] known audio playback bug in Finale 2008

Just an FYI note. I recently updated to Finale 2008 for my Intel Mac. I sent the following bug report to MakeMusic: After updating to Finale 2007 (I described my system) I find I no longer have right channel audio output in several situations within Finale. I do have full left and

Re: [Finale] known audio playback bug in Finale 2008

Bob Shuster / 2007/07/30 / 01:55 PM wrote: After updating to Finale 2007 (I described my system) I find I no longer have right channel audio output in several situations within Finale. You mean 2008. I have reported it here as soon as 2008 came out, and MM! has acknowledged the bug. The bug

RE: [Finale] known audio playback bug in Finale 2008

I assume CA=Core Audio, so this is a Mac-only issue, yes? Jim From: A-NO-NE Music Sent: Mon 30-Jul-07 14:44 To: finale@shsu.edu Subject: Re: [Finale] known audio playback bug in Finale 2008 Bob Shuster / 2007/07/30 / 01:55 PM wrote: After updating to Finale 2007 (I described my system) I

Re: [Finale] known audio playback bug in Finale 2008

Williams, Jim / 2007/07/30 / 04:49 PM wrote: I assume CA=Core Audio, so this is a Mac-only issue, yes? Yes. Sorry about that. -- - Hiro Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA http://a-no-ne.com http://anonemusic.com ___ Finale mailing list

Re: [Finale] Is this a bug?

On 22.06.2007 Andrew Stiller wrote: But you don't have to make this choice! To exclude a measure from numbering, simply end the numbering region before it and start a new one after it. I do this all the time. Yes, that's what I did over years, but the new method is infinitely simpler to

Re: [Finale] Is this a bug?

On 22.06.2007 Christopher Smith wrote: 1) did you ever check the box in Measure Attributes do not include in measure numbering? Don't use this, as it causes lots of weird things to happen, like edits affect more than one measure at a time. Double-click the measure with the Measure Tool to

Re: [Finale] Is this a bug?

On Jun 22, 2007, at 2:03 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote: On 22.06.2007 Christopher Smith wrote: 1) did you ever check the box in Measure Attributes do not include in measure numbering? Don't use this, as it causes lots of weird things to happen, like edits affect more than one measure at a time.

[Finale] Is this a bug?

Hi Christopher, Thanks for your answer. As to your questions, I never touched the box in Measures Attributes and I did not create a mirror. I know I need to cancel the pizz. marking with an arco marking, but this cannot explain this phenomenon because otherwise the first and the third notes

Re: [Finale] Is this a bug?

On Jun 22, 2007, at 1:37 PM, Will Denayer wrote: Hi Christopher, Thanks for your answer. As to your questions, I never touched the box in Measures Attributes and I did not create a mirror. I know I need to cancel the pizz. marking with an arco marking, but this cannot explain this

[Finale] Is this a bug?

Hello, I was playing with the articulation tool, 3 measures in 4/4, all quarter notes for violin KS. I put a pluck symbol above the second and the fourth note of the first measure to see if the playback would be right. It is, but the programme plays the second and the fourth note of the

Re: [Finale] Is this a bug?

On Jun 21, 2007, at 7:08 PM, Will Denayer wrote: Hello, I was playing with the articulation tool, 3 measures in 4/4, all quarter notes for violin KS. I put a pluck symbol above the second and the fourth note of the first measure to see if the playback would be right. It is, but the

Re: [Finale] Is this a bug?

On Jun 21, 2007, at 9:07 PM, Christopher Smith wrote: On Jun 21, 2007, at 7:08 PM, Will Denayer wrote: Hello, I was playing with the articulation tool, 3 measures in 4/4, all quarter notes for violin KS. I put a pluck symbol above the second and the fourth note of the first measure to

[Finale] This IS a bug!

I'm sure this really is a bug! See Below. Cheers K in OZ Keith Helgesen. image001.gif___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

[Finale] explode music enharmonic bug (F07)

mac F2007c can anyone confirm this? create a chord of C#-Eb in one measure and in the following measure C#-D#. hit opt-9 (enharmonic alteration) on the second chord and explode to 2 staves, 1 note per staff. C# and Eb appear in the 1st measure BUT in the 2nd it is C# and ***Db*** it

Re: [Finale] explode music enharmonic bug (F07)

shirling neueweise wrote: mac F2007c can anyone confirm this? create a chord of C#-Eb in one measure and in the following measure C#-D#. hit opt-9 (enharmonic alteration) on the second chord and explode to 2 staves, 1 note per staff. C# and Eb appear in the 1st measure BUT in the 2nd it is

Re: [Finale] explode music enharmonic bug (F07)

On May 20, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Randolph Peters wrote: shirling neueweise wrote: mac F2007c can anyone confirm this? create a chord of C#-Eb in one measure and in the following measure C#-D#. hit opt-9 (enharmonic alteration) on the second chord and explode to 2 staves, 1 note per staff.

Re: [Finale] explode music enharmonic bug (F07)

i also tried to set to single pitch and it doesn't work properly on these notes! krap. -- shirling neueweise ... new music publishers mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :.../ http://newmusicnotation.com ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu

RE: [Finale] Re: smart shape bug?

: [Finale] Re: smart shape bug? i would expect that if finale was aware of the bug in 2006 it would have been fixed for 2007. but i expect too much sometimes. Fisher, Allen afisher at makemusic.com This sounds familiar, there was an issue with SmartShapes in Finale 2006

[Finale] Re: smart shape bug?

i would expect that if finale was aware of the bug in 2006 it would have been fixed for 2007. but i expect too much sometimes. Fisher, Allen afisher at makemusic.com This sounds familiar, there was an issue with SmartShapes in Finale 2006 that was solved by loading a Doc options library

Re: [Finale] Re: smart shape bug?

At 12:14 PM 12/15/2006, shirling neueweise wrote: i would expect that if finale was aware of the bug in 2006 it would have been fixed for 2007. Hahahahahaha.. Aaron. ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo

Re: [Finale] smart shape macro bug

Randolph Peters wrote: Can anyone confirm if this is a bug? In Finale 2007 (Mac) we can no longer make macros for smart shapes. There are some predefined ones, but the user manual says we can make our own. (NOT!) I don't remember ever being able to make macros for SmartShapes. (WinFin

Re: [Finale] smart shape macro bug

It's an unbelievable time-saver, especially in some music, like with piano pedalling, or smart shape intensive scores. Le 06-10-15 à 08:12, dhbailey a écrit : I don't remember ever being able to make macros for SmartShapes. (WinFin) ___

Re: [Finale] smart shape macro bug

On 15.10.2006 dhbailey wrote: I don't remember ever being able to make macros for SmartShapes. (WinFin) I believe we are talking about metatools, not macros. Johannes -- http://www.musikmanufaktur.com http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de ___ Finale

Re: [Finale] smart shape macro bug

Eric, I don't know if the kinds of things you need are in Bill Duncan's custom smart shapes. I use only a few of them, but it might be worth a look, if you use these things a lot. For instance, there's a combined ped...* that stretches and shrinks as spacings change. Chuck On Oct

Re: [Finale] smart shape macro bug

dhbailey wrote: I don't remember ever being able to make macros for SmartShapes. (WinFin) I should have used the word metatool instead of macro. The OLM says the following (pg. 21-3): To Program a Smart Shape metatool You can assign a number or letter to any Smart Shape that exists in

[Finale] smart shape macro bug

Can anyone confirm if this is a bug? In Finale 2007 (Mac) we can no longer make macros for smart shapes. There are some predefined ones, but the user manual says we can make our own. (NOT!) Thanks for checking. -Randolph Peters ___ Finale mailing

[Finale] smart shape macro bug

Can anyone confirm if this is a bug? In Finale 2007 (Mac) we can no longer make macros for smart shapes. There are some predefined ones, but the user manual says we can make our own. (NOT!) Thanks for checking. -Randolph Peters (For some unexplained reason this message was blank the last

Re: [Finale] smart shape macro bug

anyone confirm if this is a bug? In Finale 2007 (Mac) we can no longer make macros for smart shapes. There are some predefined ones, but the user manual says we can make our own. (NOT!) Thanks for checking. -Randolph Peters ___ Finale mailing list

Re: [Finale] smart shape macro bug

and renamed it 2007 before using the new version? see this thread: http://tinyurl.com/yzlruv using a freshly created preference file solved the problem for me. Le 06-10-14 à 19:59, Randolph Peters a écrit : Can anyone confirm if this is a bug? In Finale 2007 (Mac) we can no longer make macros

[Finale] Special Part Extraction-bug?

Hi everyone!One thing in Finale 2007 is giving a great deal of cold feet at the moment:I'm trying to adjust to work with linked parts. However;I want to be able to have my old "express"-method; "Special Part Extraction" at hand when needed (especially for Big Band scores where I can

[Finale] 2k7 stem connection bug?

Please confirm: Go to Document Options/Stems/Use Stem Connections/Stem Connections I cannot get Create or Edit to work. Oh gurus and mavens, please check this for me for lo, methinks there is a scary bug! Thanks, Chuck Chuck Israels 230 North Garden Terrace Bellingham, WA 98225-5836

Re: [Finale] 2k7 stem connection bug?

At 08:04 PM 8/21/2006, Chuck Israels wrote: Go to Document Options/Stems/Use Stem Connections/Stem Connections I cannot get Create or Edit to work. Works for me on Win. Aaron. ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu

Re: [Finale] 2k7 stem connection bug?

Thanks Aaron, Maybe it's a Mac version bug. Mac users please check. Thanks, Chuck On Aug 21, 2006, at 5:40 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote: At 08:04 PM 8/21/2006, Chuck Israels wrote: Go to Document Options/Stems/Use Stem Connections/Stem Connections I cannot get Create or Edit to work.

Re: [Finale] 2k7 stem connection bug?

Chuck Israels / 2006/08/21 / 08:53 PM wrote: Thanks Aaron, Maybe it's a Mac version bug. Mac users please check. Yes, Chuck. I can confirm. It isn't working. Good catch. -- - Hiro Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA http://a-no-ne.com http://anonemusic.com

RE: [Finale] First Finale 2006b bug?

@shsu.edu Subject: Re: [Finale] First Finale 2006b bug? It is possible that it behaves this way with indepedant time signature on. Have you tried that? Le 05-12-13 à 21:53, Simon Troup a écrit : Hi Eric Can't reproduce that here at all. Eric Dussault Finale 2006b for Mac PowerMac G5 Dual 1.8

Re: [Finale] First Finale 2006b bug?

Le 05-12-14 à 11:28, Fisher, Allen a écrit :I just created a file with four staves, all set to independent time sig and it works fine. Éric, I'd suggest sending this in to support... Thanks Allen, already done. Eric Dussault ___ Finale mailing list

[Finale] First Finale 2006b bug?

First test with Finale 2006b and an important bug! Really, it's the first thing I did when I opened 2006b. Just wanted to test the Time signature tool improvement and apply a time signature to a measure with an existing document (a copy of it of course). Nothing happens and I am at the end

Re: [Finale] First Finale 2006b bug?

First test with Finale 2006b and an important bug! Really, it's the first thing I did when I opened 2006b. Just wanted to test the Time signature tool improvement and apply a time signature to a measure with an existing document (a copy of it of course). Nothing happens and I am at the end

Re: [Finale] First Finale 2006b bug?

PowerMac G5 Dual 1.8 GHz 1GB Ram Le 05-12-13 à 21:42, Éric Dussault a écrit : First test with Finale 2006b and an important bug! Really, it's the first thing I did when I opened 2006b. Just wanted to test the Time signature tool improvement and apply a time signature to a measure with an existing

Re: [Finale] First Finale 2006b bug?

 La Note Bleue wrote:First test with Finale 2006b and an important bug! Really, it's the first thing I did when I opened 2006b. Just wanted to test the Time signature tool improvement and apply a time signature to a measure with an existing document (a copy of it of course). Nothing happens and I

Re: [Finale] First Finale 2006b bug?

It is possible that it behaves this way with indepedant time signature on.Have you tried that?Le 05-12-13 à 21:53, Simon Troup a écrit :Hi Eric Can't reproduce that here at all. Eric DussaultFinale 2006b for MacPowerMac G5 Dual 1.8 GHz1GB Ram ___

Re: [Finale] First Finale 2006b bug?

Le 05-12-13 à 22:00, Éric Dussault a écrit :It works fine for me too with a normal setting with no independant time signatures.I rarely use this feature, but when I need it, it has to work reliably.Le 05-12-13 à 21:53, Simon Troup a écrit :Hi EricCan't reproduce that here at all. Eric

  1   2   3   >