Dear Arturo,
Thank you very much for responding to my post (nobody else did not reacted
to the UCLA finding).
Even more thanks for directing me to the Neuroskeptic blog - the real
discussion about the UCLA finding took place only there.
You are incorrect stating that the "paper about
Dear all,
My name - Emanuel - in a literal translation means "God with us".
Despite of that, for the purpose of our current discussion, I would like to
mention:
The external observer, which provide us with the needed semantic information
used (as a reference) for physical information
Dear Sung, Dear FIS colleagues,
Greeting Sung's arguments in regard of information duality challenge, I had
no intention to depart from our current ongoing schedule - the discourse on
the John Torday's New Year Lecture. (That is why I am not responding and
will not respond to your comments).
d for years, albeit under more
historically rooted names: Physical and Semantic information [1]. Never
mind, what is crucially important here is that the duality of information
becomes publicly recognized and accepted by FIS community.
I salute to Sungchul's suggestion!
Best regards, Em
Dear Pedro, Dear Fises,
I apologize, as usual, for intervening in your respected discussion. But in
my humble understanding, the genotype-phenotype-sociotype triad is simply a
list of behavioral forms (or types). Evidently, they all are endorsed and
inspired by the information that is in
nkovic [mailto:gordana.dodig-crnko...@chalmers.se]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 12:17 PM
To: Emanuel Diamant
Cc: markburgin
Subject: INVITATION TO WORLD SCIENTIFIC VOLUME ON THE STUDY OF INFORMATION
Dear Emanuel,
As a result of Gothenburg meeting of the International Society for the
cannot be falsifiable as the
hypothesis of gravitional waves, but they may be discussed rationnally as
starting points for principles and definitions of information.
Cordialement. M. Godron
Le 06/10/2017 à 18:26, Emanuel Diamant a écrit :
Dear FISers,
I have heartily welcomed Pedros initiative to
Dear FISers,
I have heartily welcomed Pedro's initiative to work out some principles of
information definition quest. But the upsetting discussion unrolled around
the issue pushes me to restrain my support for the Pedro's proposal. The
problem (in my understanding) is that FIS discussants are
Dear Pedro, Dear FIS Colleagues,
I heartily welcome Pedro's attempt to discipline our discussion on
Principles that underpin our engagement with information studies. After all,
the prime and most important purpose of our discussions is to find out the
right and the all-embracing definition
pipermail/fis/2016-June/001039.html). And finally:
"(there is an) urgent need to move away from entropy towards algorithmic
information" (http://sciforum.net/conference/IS4SI-2017/isis-ICPI%202017).
I hope these unfriendly winds will not mak
Dear Pedro,
Dear FIS colleagues,
Because our current discussion (dubbed "Scientific Communication", announced
by Pedro at Sept. 22, 2016) has deviated from its original purpose and
shifted to our main and most relevant point of interest "What is
information", I dare to remind you about my
Dear Hector,
I am very impressed by your letter to Joe Brener. You are absolutely right
when you say that Shannon's information is obsolete and is of limited use.
But you are wrong saying that (it) "should not even be mentioned any longer
in serious discussions about information". As far
like when I begin to preach and to teach FIS people that the
Sun is rising on the East.
Okay, I agree, and accept, and obey his constraints. For that reason, I will
shut up with my comments.
My best and kind regards to all of you,
Yours, Emanuel Diamant.
___
Fis mailing list
Fis@listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
2015 2:38 PM
To: Günther Witzany
Cc: Emanuel Diamant; fa...@howardbloom.net; 'fis'
Subject: Re: Information is a linguistic description of structures
Dear FISers and all,
I include below another response to Immanuel post (from Guenther). I think
he has penned an excellent response--my only addition i
Dear FIS colleagues,
As a newcomer to FIS, I feel myself very uncomfortable when I have to
interrupt the ongoing discourse with something that looks for me quite
natural but is lacking in our current public dialog. What I have in mind is
that in every discussion or argument exchange, first of
Diamant.
From: Jerry LR Chandler [mailto:jerry_lr_chand...@me.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 8:42 PM
To: Emanuel Diamant
Subject: Re: [Fis] FIS newcomer
Dear Emanuel:
Thanks for posting your views on Research Gate.
Interesting perspective, but... the essence
,
Emanuel Diamant.
___
Fis mailing list
Fis@listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
17 matches
Mail list logo
