Dear Arturo,
Thank you very much for responding to my post (nobody else did not reacted
to the UCLA finding).
Even more thanks for directing me to the Neuroskeptic blog - the real
discussion about the UCLA finding took place only there.
You are incorrect stating that the "paper about mem
Dear FIS Colleagues,
For most of the time, I restrain myself from taking part in the FIS
discussions - we speak different languages and adhere to different
principles. My paper invited for publication in MDPI Informatics Special
Issue: Selected Papers from the ISIS Summit Vienna 2015 has been d
Dear all,
My name - Emanuel - in a literal translation means "God with us".
Despite of that, for the purpose of our current discussion, I would like to
mention:
The external observer, which provide us with the needed semantic information
used (as a reference) for physical information interpr
Dear Sung, Dear FIS colleagues,
Greeting Sung's arguments in regard of information duality challenge, I had
no intention to depart from our current ongoing schedule - the discourse on
the John Torday's New Year Lecture. (That is why I am not responding and
will not respond to your comments).
orward for years, albeit under more
historically rooted names: Physical and Semantic information [1]. Never
mind, what is crucially important here is that the duality of information
becomes publicly recognized and accepted by FIS community.
I salute to Sungchul's suggestion!
Best regard
Dear Pedro, Dear Fises,
I apologize, as usual, for intervening in your respected discussion. But in
my humble understanding, the genotype-phenotype-sociotype triad is simply a
list of behavioral forms (or types). Evidently, they all are endorsed and
inspired by the information that is in the
nkovic [mailto:gordana.dodig-crnko...@chalmers.se]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 12:17 PM
To: Emanuel Diamant
Cc: markburgin
Subject: INVITATION TO WORLD SCIENTIFIC VOLUME ON THE STUDY OF INFORMATION
Dear Emanuel,
As a result of Gothenburg meeting of the International Society for the
nnot be falsifiable as the
hypothesis of gravitional waves, but they may be discussed rationnally as
starting points for principles and definitions of information.
Cordialement. M. Godron
Le 06/10/2017 à 18:26, Emanuel Diamant a écrit :
Dear FISers,
I have heartily welcomed Pedros initiative to
Dear FISers,
I have heartily welcomed Pedro's initiative to work out some principles of
information definition quest. But the upsetting discussion unrolled around
the issue pushes me to restrain my support for the Pedro's proposal. The
problem (in my understanding) is that FIS discussants are
Dear Pedro, Dear FIS Colleagues,
I heartily welcome Pedro's attempt to discipline our discussion on
Principles that underpin our engagement with information studies. After all,
the prime and most important purpose of our discussions is to find out the
right and the all-embracing definition
unizar.es/pipermail/fis/2016-June/001039.html). And finally:
"(there is an) urgent need to move away from entropy towards algorithmic
information" (http://sciforum.net/conference/IS4SI-2017/isis-ICPI%202017).
I hope these unfriendly winds wi
678243
Emanuel Diamant, Computational Intelligence: are you crazy? Since when has
intelligence become computational?
Conference: 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (IEEE
SSCI2016), December 2016, Athens, Greece.
--
Dear Pedro,
Dear FIS colleagues,
Because our current discussion (dubbed "Scientific Communication", announced
by Pedro at Sept. 22, 2016) has deviated from its original purpose and
shifted to our main and most relevant point of interest "What is
information", I dare to remind you about my per
Dear Hector,
I am very impressed by your letter to Joe Brener. You are absolutely right
when you say that Shannon's information is obsolete and is of limited use.
But you are wrong saying that (it) "should not even be mentioned any longer
in serious discussions about information". As far as
res?
Pedro does not like when I begin to preach and to teach FIS people that the
Sun is rising on the East.
Okay, I agree, and accept, and obey his constraints. For that reason, I will
shut up with my comments.
My best and kind regards to all of you,
Yours, Emanuel Diamant.
___
Fis mailing list
Fis@listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
e the
issue is still interested for some FIS partakers).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291352419_The_brain_is_processing_i
nformation_not_data_Does_anybody_knows_about_that
Best regards,
Emanuel Diamant.
___
Fis mailing list
Fis@l
, September 25, 2015 2:38 PM
To: Günther Witzany
Cc: Emanuel Diamant; fa...@howardbloom.net; 'fis'
Subject: Re: Information is a linguistic description of structures
Dear FISers and all,
I include below another response to Immanuel post (from Guenther). I think
he has penned an excellent res
Dear FIS colleagues,
As a newcomer to FIS, I feel myself very uncomfortable when I have to
interrupt the ongoing discourse with something that looks for me quite
natural but is lacking in our current public dialog. What I have in mind is
that in every discussion or argument exchange, first of a
(and other mainstream FIS contributors) obey and adhere to.
I am a newcomer to FIS and I do not intend to preach in the others’ temple. But
Prof. Kun Wu is one of the founding fathers of the Philosophy of Information.
Therefore, it would be wise for you to be in an agreement with his postula
an agreement with
his postulates.
Best regards,
Emanuel Diamant.
From: Jerry LR Chandler [mailto:jerry_lr_chand...@me.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 8:42 PM
To: Emanuel Diamant
Subject: Re: [Fis] FIS newcomer
Dear Emanuel:
Thanks for posting your views on Res
,
Emanuel Diamant.
___
Fis mailing list
Fis@listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
21 matches
Mail list logo
