Josh Babcock wrote:
Well, the B-29 doesn't really have any correct JSBSim config at all, so
you might as well just ignore that entry. I don't think I will ever get
the polar data for the Boeing wing, so it will probably not happen in
the future either.
Are you sure:
Hi Jeehyeon,
I have the feeling you think I'm one of the MacOS developers, but
unfortunately I'm not. You would be best off directing the question to
the developers mailinglist.
Erik
Jeehyeon Eom wrote:
Hi,
first of all, I am enthusiastic fan of FlightGear, and I appreciate for
your
Olaf Flebbe
Please use the OpenAL Distribution from creative, not the cygwin one.
Since it is necessary to do some changes I have a a zip for you:
http://www.oflebbe.de/oflebbe/FlightGear/AL.zip
For other pitfalls http://www.oflebbe.de/oflebbe/FlightGear/index.html
Please either use
I'm trying to compile FlightGear 0.9.10-pre3 on my PowerBook, but the installation of simgear fails while "make" with following error messages: if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../simgear -I../.. -I/FlightGear/include -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -MT visual_enviro.o -MD -MP -MF
Hello,
this is now going to be the third release in a row that relies on PLIB
CVS, I find this is a bit unsatisfactory. On the other side people are
waiting endlessly to get patches incorporated into PLIB.
I herewith propose to put a copy of PLIB into the SimGear tree after
the release is out, to
Unfortunately, I discovered that submodels no longer work. I downloaded
Fred's binary of -0.9.10-pre3 this morning, and they no longer work there
either. So far as I can see, they are still working under Cygwin as of last
night.
Do you have a test case ? What should I do to exhibit the
* Frederic Bouvier -- Thursday 06 April 2006 12:09:
Unfortunately, I discovered that submodels no longer work.
Do you have a test case ? What should I do to exhibit the problem ?
The most important submodels are without any doubt the bo105's Gatling
style guns M134. :-]
$ fgfs
Fred
Unfortunately, I discovered that submodels no longer work. I downloaded
Fred's binary of -0.9.10-pre3 this morning, and they no longer work
there
either. So far as I can see, they are still working under Cygwin as of
last
night.
Do you have a test case ? What should I do to
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 09:21:33 + (UTC)
Martin Spott wrote:
Hello,
this is now going to be the third release in a row that relies on PLIB
CVS, I find this is a bit unsatisfactory. On the other side people are
waiting endlessly to get patches incorporated into PLIB.
I herewith propose to
On Thursday 06 April 2006 10:21, Martin Spott wrote:
this is now going to be the third release in a row that relies on PLIB
CVS, I find this is a bit unsatisfactory.
I've been building CVS with plib-1.8.4 (the last release) for ages with no
particular problems, so I'm not sure it's true to say
AJ MacLeod
On Thursday 06 April 2006 10:21, Martin Spott wrote:
this is now going to be the third release in a row that relies on PLIB
CVS, I find this is a bit unsatisfactory.
I've been building CVS with plib-1.8.4 (the last release) for ages with no
particular problems, so I'm not sure
As some of you have already noticed, the source/data tarballs for
FlightGear-v0.9.10 are now available. Fred has already made a windows
binary available, so I'm going to try to get the web site updated and
push out an official announcement today.
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson
* Curtis L. Olson -- Thursday 06 April 2006 15:08:
Huh!?! I've been building with plib-v1.8.4 happily without any
problems. Officially we depend on v1.8.4. If there's something in
plib-cvs that we could benefit from, then we should encourage those guys
to do another release.
I would
syd sandy wrote:
Hi all , just discovered a problem with the aircraft downloads from
the website while trying to solve a problem for Steve , who downloaded
my Citation Bravo and reported errors.
The Bravo , and several others of mine rely on instruments in the
Instrument-3d folder , but
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
I would *really* like to switch to a new plib version (and make this
a requirement), because ...
- several pu.h widgets are depreciated, and are now in puAux, where they
are actually maintained. (It's quite embarrassing if one has to submit
bugfixes for obsolete
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Huh!?! I've been building with plib-v1.8.4 happily without any
problems. Officially we depend on v1.8.4. If there's something in
plib-cvs that we could benefit from, then we should encourage those guys
to do another release.
Several patches and improvements went
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
I don't think we gain much from forking plib. *If* we have people
interested in working on plib, those can as well ask for plib
write access. (The texture compression was IMHO not advertized
well, so I'm not really surprised that it was ignored.)
Forgive me my
* Curtis L. Olson -- Thursday 06 April 2006 16:11:
In the past, when we've lobbied the plib people for a new release,
they've been very forth coming. Has anyone asked them to consider
rolling out a new release?
Yes, Martin has. Shortly before the 0.9.9 release, and Steve's response
was
On Thursday 06 April 2006 15:32, Stefan Seifert wrote:
Forgive me my ignorance, I have only tested the first posted version of
the patch. Is compression with this patch optional? Using the patch was
no problem with my ATI card (although it didn't help much), but results
were just ugly after I
* Stefan Seifert -- Thursday 06 April 2006 16:32:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
The texture compression was IMHO not advertized well, so I'm not
really surprised that it was ignored.)
Forgive me my ignorance, I have only tested the first posted version of
the patch. Is compression with this
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Lee Elliott wrote:
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 10:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Are there anyone else interested in lighter than air flight
for FlightGear/JSBSim?
Comments and suggestions are welcome!
There is a balloon fdm in FlightGear but the last time I
Howdy everyone,
As far as the super 737 goes, it indeed looks like the FDM is getting bad info
from FG, but I don't know details as I haven't looked into it. As I wrote to
Jon, I suspect sea-level atmosphere numbers are being sent.
How high can a 737-300 go? Nobody knows. Even though the
The air-ground.nas system assumes that the airplane starts on the ground. I
used this assumption to simplify things because air-ground.nas was my first
attempt at Nasal system programming. In order to get the spoilers working
right for an in-flight start you might need to disable
On Thursday 06 April 2006 15:07, Vivian Meazza wrote:
I think that this provides a sensible migration route to OSG, if that is
the way we are going, otherwise it seems a good proposal in its own right.
Apart
True,
I have most of that parts of ssg that are required by flightgear simgear
Hi,
I too had some delays - mainly due to
house guests cutting down my computer
time ;=))
Thanks for the addition of config.h-msvc8
to CVS. I wonder why it was not called
either just config.h-msvc, since it WORKS
with ALL version of MSVC, or at least
config.h-msvc6, as it WAS called before ...
I'll look into it, maybe i can make those plots for you using a vortex panel method on the profile of the airfoil.
I'll keep you posted.
Julien
On Thursday 06 April 2006 10:50, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Melchior FRANZ -- Wednesday 05 April 2006 07:51:
* Lee Elliott -- Tuesday 04 April 2006 22:49:
There also seem to be some quirks in the way that the A/P
gui handles things - if you already have an A/P mode
engaged but didn't set
Andy Ross wrote:
[redirecting to flightgear-devel]
If audio is required, then this ought to be tied to turbulence also,
or maybe to instantaneous acceleration changes (a delta of more than
YYY m/s^2 over the last 0.XX seconds triggers the start of a whump
sound).
I have been thinking about
28 matches
Mail list logo
