Peter B. West wrote:
This step seems to have some problems. I have just gone through the
cycle of building locally, checking the changes into HEAD, getting
forrestbot to refresh, checking the just-constucted site, and then
getting forrestbot to publish. I had problems on the live site that
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 01:56:04AM +1000, Peter B. West wrote:
Victor Mote wrote:
My understanding is as follows:
1. The refresh button on the http://forrestbot.cocoondev.org site will
take the contents at cvs.apache.org/cvs/xml-fop as input, and generate the
web site. That is what is
Jeremias,
Forrest CVS. I modified forrest.build.xml in my xml-forrest tree to get
it to locate the .js files. I haven't tried a cvs up on forrest because
of warnings that things might be a bit unstable ATM.
Peter
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Peter,
which one is broken, forrest CVS or fop CVS?
--
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 05:30:47PM +1000, Peter B. West wrote:
Victor,
There's a slight problem here. My files can only be built successfully
with a mod to forrest.build.xml that copies the contents of
resources/scripts into context. If forrestbot is building off CVS with
a slightly
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 08:03:42PM +1100, Jeff Turner wrote:
...
Instead of modifying Forrest, if you copy the *.js files from resources/*
to content/*, so you have:
[xml-fop ~/src/documentation/content]$ find . -name codedisplay.js
./design/alt.design/properties/codedisplay.js
Jeff Turner wrote:
Then the only broken files are:
- [broken page] pdf-security.html -
- [broken page] dev/output.html -
The attached patch fixes these two.
Thanks very much. I have just committed these changes. I will probably be
regenerating the site later in the day.
Victor Mote
Victor,
I'll make and commit the changes that Jeff recommended. We can then use
the bot output or out own forrest run to generate the site. It still
has to be committed and the leve site updated by hand, as I understand
things.
Peter
Victor Mote wrote:
Peter B. West wrote:
...
I just took
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 10:04:58PM -0700, Victor Mote wrote:
Peter B. West wrote:
That should be, ...still has to be committed. The 6-hourly script
will presumably update from the website CVS.
Peter B. West wrote:
Victor,
I'll make and commit the changes that Jeff recommended.
Keiron Liddle wrote:
Peter, Keiron: how is the web site updated? I thought there was a
cron job every few hours?
Currently it only updates the site here:
http://forrestbot.cocoondev.com (seems to
be down at the moment)
From this site you can update the main site by entering the correct
Victor,
There's a slight problem here. My files can only be built successfully
with a mod to forrest.build.xml that copies the contents of
resources/scripts into context. If forrestbot is building off CVS with
a slightly elderly version (and I understand the current CVS is going to
be a
Peter B. West wrote:
Keiron Liddle wrote:
Peter, Keiron: how is the web site updated? I thought there was a
cron job every few hours?
Currently it only updates the site here:
http://forrestbot.cocoondev.com (seems to
be down at the moment)
From this site you can update the main
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
If there is anything you need reworked, just let me know.
No problem apart from the surprise.
I wrote up something in pdfencryption.xml, checked in in HEAD (not
the maintenance branch). If you (or someone else) would proofread
it, in order to spare others the trouble...
Peter, Keiron: how is the web site updated? I thought there was a
cron job every few hours?
Currently it only updates the site here: http://forrestbot.cocoondev.com (seems to
be down at the moment)
From this site you can update the main site by entering the correct
name/password, I'll send
Keiron Liddle wrote:
Peter, Keiron: how is the web site updated? I thought there was a
cron job every few hours?
Currently it only updates the site here: http://forrestbot.cocoondev.com (seems to
be down at the moment)
From this site you can update the main site by entering the correct
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Add jce-jdk13-118.jar (for 1.3.x) to %JAVA_HOME%\jre\lib\ext and add
security.provider.6=org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider
to %JAVA_HOME%\jre\lib\security\java.security in the appropriate section.
This should work. This is how it is done to support any
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Add jce-jdk13-118.jar (for 1.3.x) to %JAVA_HOME%\jre\lib\ext and add
security.provider.6=org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider
to %JAVA_HOME%\jre\lib\security\java.security in the appropriate section.
This should work
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Thanks... if there are any issues or work that is needed, I'm MORE than
happy to help.
I got the JDK 1.3 compatibility now.
However, while testing the encryption I'm getting
Cannot find any provider supporting RC4
The JCE doc for JDK1.4 at
Would you prefer a direct use of the bouncycastle crypto or modification to
the build that tests the JDK?
Pat
-Original Message-
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 5:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
J.Pietschmann wrote
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Thanks... if there are any issues or work that is needed, I'm MORE than
happy to help.
I got the JDK 1.3 compatibility now.
However, while testing the encryption I'm getting
Cannot find any provider supporting RC4
The JCE
Hey,
Has anybody looked at this? It's been two weeks since I submitted it and I
have not heard anything. Did I miss something? I'd like to get this included
before the code base changes and I have to reimplement by hand.
Pat Lankswert
-Original Message-
From: Patrick C. Lankswert
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Has anybody looked at this?
Yes. I'm currently in the process of integrating the stuff.
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks... if there are any issues or work that is needed, I'm MORE than
happy to help.
Pat
-Original Message-
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Has anybody
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Has anybody looked at this?
Yes. I'm currently in the process of integrating the stuff.
I'll have to do some more test, in particular for JDK1.3 compatibility
(no javax.crypto there).
Commit deferred to next Friday.
J.Pietschmann
From: Patrick C. Lankswert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, it does not seem to support the CVS diff command. When I select
diff, it gives me a visual comparison. I assume that CVS diff is like the
UN*X command line diff for use with patch... can anybody help.
Unfortunately, I am on a Windows
Chris,
Thanks...
Pat
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 5:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Encryption
From: Patrick C. Lankswert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, it does not seem to support the CVS diff command. When
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Hi Patrick
On 10.02.2003 06:17:26 Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Ok... with two separate weekends of the stomach flu in my house, it took a
little longer than I had hoped. However, I have a working copy of the V1
R2
encryption with support for user and owner passwords
Hi Patrick
On 10.02.2003 06:17:26 Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
Ok... with two separate weekends of the stomach flu in my house, it took a
little longer than I had hoped. However, I have a working copy of the V1 R2
encryption with support for user and owner passwords, print, copy, content
edit
: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Hi Patrick
Because still noone has started working on it? :-) It's one of the most
requested features. On the other side, iText seems to work for those who
want
2:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
Hi Patrick
That's great news! I'll be glad to help testing and integrating.
But one question: Why would you want to implement RC4 yourself? Wouldn't
it be better if we used (for example) bouncycastle.org's implementation
for that? They have
Jeremias,
Thanks for the reply. Outside of clean up, I have working code. It is
limited since only PDF 1.3 is supported by FOP and I am currently using a
The redesign code generates PDF 1.4 (which currently is used in a completely
backwards/forwards compatible way).
How does the
Hi Patrick
That's great news! I'll be glad to help testing and integrating.
But one question: Why would you want to implement RC4 yourself? Wouldn't
it be better if we used (for example) bouncycastle.org's implementation
for that? They have an MIT licence which is compatible with the APL
AFAIK.
Hi Patrick
Because still noone has started working on it? :-) It's one of the most
requested features. On the other side, iText seems to work for those who
want to add encryption.
Would you like to help? We can use all the help we can get.
On 09.01.2003 07:34:09 Patrick C. Lankswert wrote:
I
To apply encryption to FOP generated PDF files we post process the files
with a command line tool called pdcat from a PDF tools set available from
http://pdf.glance.ch.
If you are looking for an all Java solution I believe iText from
http://www.lowagie.com/iText/ also allows encryption (but no
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:17 PM
Subject: RE: Encryption
To apply encryption to FOP generated PDF files we post process the files
with a command line tool called pdcat from a PDF tools set available from
http://pdf.glance.ch.
If you are looking for an all
. Bitton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2002 10:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Encryption
I quickly looked at iText, and that is not a XSL-FO - PDF engine.
RenderX's XEP Java app does do encryption, but they are not a viable option
for us. Where in the FOP process could we
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:51 PM
Subject: RE: Encryption
David,
You are correct both solutions are post processing type solutions, ie. it
is
an additional step after the XSL-FO - PDF conversion. I am pretty certain
FOP, in its current version, cannot do it. The question for you
36 matches
Mail list logo
