cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo/expr PropertyParser.java

pbwest 2002/10/09 20:27:01 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo/expr Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design PropertyParser.java Log: Allow IntegerType PropertyValues as arguments to parseAdditiveExpr() and parseUnaryExpr(). Restructure parseMultiplicativeExpr() to include

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/fo FOAttributes.java

pbwest 2002/10/09 20:16:12 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/fo Tag: FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design FOAttributes.java Log: Remove xmlns attributes before processing. Delete Attributes object from event after processing. Revision ChangesPath No

Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP

Patrick, It remains to be seen how the 1.4 BIDI handling can be integrated with FOP's layout, and how BIDI processing can be gracefully declined for users not running 1.4. As Unicode and i18n are your strengths, I think your input on this would be very valuable. Perhaps Oleg is already cons

Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP

Oleg, Thanks for this. I just had a look at java.text.Bidi, and was led inexorably into java.awt.font, and from there back to bedrock - java.lang.Character. It's Wonderland in there, and I haven't had time to digest it, but it looks as though all of the attributes from the Unicode character

Re: New Developer Suggestion

J.Pietschmann wrote: ... > > For working on HEAD, pick an area: > - layout core > - a renderer > - the font subsystem > - API and configuration > - parsing and property resolution Don't pick this one. There is definitely a lot of work going on in this area, which will at least be relevant to

Re: documentation

Christian Geisert wrote: > Ok. IMHO the next step should be the migration of the current docs > to forrest (Joerg?) Migration to forrest DTDs. I seem to have lost track of recent changes, and I'm still unwilling to force everyone to use forrest, which includes Cocoon, simply to build the docs, wh

Re: New Developer Suggestion

Sauyet, Scott (OTS-HAR) wrote: >>So what I was hoping for is a suggestion for something that I can work >>on that might be useful, but not critical to any immediate plans, >>ideally something that overlaps little with currently active portions of >>the project. > > > There were no replies yes

Re: documentation

Victor Mote schrieb: > FOP Developers: > > I submitted a patch (through Bugzilla, for trunk) that fixes some problems > in the pdfdoc build. I realize that Joerg is doing some work in that area as > well, and I don't mean to step on any of that, but I am not sure exactly > what that work involves

Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP

- Message d'origine - De : "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envoyé : 9 oct. 2002 17:27 Objet : Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP > patrick andries wrote: > >>There are also various code points assigned > >>to ligatures and presentation forms, for example U+FB0

Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP

patrick andries wrote: >>There are also various code points assigned >>to ligatures and presentation forms, for example U+FB01, which >>could be used in the FO source (at the risk of confusing >>hyphenation, spell checkers and others). > Not a good idea, these code points are deprecated. Ligature

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13464] - part of word missing when broken across pages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13464] - part of word missing when broken across pages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Where to start for an RTF renderer (was: New Developer Suggestion)

Hi Scott, On Wednesday 09 October 2002 17:15, Sauyet, Scott (OTS-HAR) wrote: >. . . > So is integrating other renderers something that the group > would eventually like to do? >. . . Yes, we've been talking about structure-based renderers (like RTF and MIF) vs. layout-based ones (PDF being the

Fw: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP

- Message d'origine - De : "Victor Mote" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envoyé : 9 oct. 2002 15:39 Objet : RE: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP > Patrick Andries wrote: > > > (*) Does anaybody know how glyphs variants and ligatures (see the > > substitution feature in Opentype

Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP

- Message d'origine - De : "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envoyé : 9 oct. 2002 15:30 Objet : Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP > patrick andries wrote: > > (*) Does anaybody know how glyphs variants and ligatures (see the > > substitution feature in Openty

RE: New Developer Suggestion

Sauyet, Scott wrote: > Does anyone have a suggestion about something I could look at fixing / > enhancing which is not mission-critical, but which might give me a chance > to look at a fair bit of the code? There are some documents in the trunk docs/design directory that have a list of things th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13464] - part of word missing when broken across pages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

RE: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP

Patrick Andries wrote: > (*) Does anaybody know how glyphs variants and ligatures (see the > substitution feature in Opentype) should be selected from fo ? I believe > there is currently no such mechanism. Should we wait until another version > of XSL-FO? Extensions ? If I understand the OpenTyp

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6243] - NullPointerException when attribute flow-name is missing

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8698] - NullPointerException when trying to render FO file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6243] - NullPointerException when attribute flow-name is missing

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13433] - PS rendering crashes with a run-time exception, "No such method"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/org/apache/fop/render/ps PSRenderer.java

pietsch 2002/10/09 12:30:21 Modified:src/org/apache/fop/render/ps Tag: fop-0_20_2-maintain PSRenderer.java Log: Fixed sloppy passing of StringBuffer which causes problems if debug information is generated. PR:13433 Submitted by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] R

Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP

patrick andries wrote: > (*) Does anaybody know how glyphs variants and ligatures (see the > substitution feature in Opentype) should be selected from fo ? I believe > there is currently no such mechanism. Should we wait until another version of > XSL-FO? Extensions ? IIRC the spec mentions i

Re: Progress report on FOP 1.0 ?

patrick andries wrote: > When last updated, on the 10th of June 2002, it was stated that the > development effort is roughly 35% towards a developers release. > > May I ask, four months later, if the baby is growing well ? Well, some important parts have been done but it is still perhaps 39% or

Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP

- Message d'origine - De : "Oleg Tkachenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > patrick andries wrote: > > Good, no need to help thus. > I didn't say that! Volunteers are desperately needed, they are blood of fop > project, so if you are willing - you are welcome. Look at today's "New > Developer Sug

Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP

patrick andries wrote: > Good, no need to help thus. I didn't say that! Volunteers are desperately needed, they are blood of fop project, so if you are willing - you are welcome. Look at today's "New Developer Suggestion" thread, for example. -- Oleg Tkachenko eXperanto team Multiconn Internat

Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP

Good, no need to help thus. - Message d'origine - De : "Oleg Tkachenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envoyé : 9 oct. 2002 13:51 Objet : Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP > patrick andries wrote: > > I'm willing to help (slowly) implementing the bidi support > > (contextua

Off-Topic Gripe (WAS:RE: New Developer Suggestion)

I think "struggling" might be understating it, at least for me. Kull Wahad! Why does the work come in faster than time? I think I smell the secret to hyperspace here... -Original Message- From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 2:07 PM To: [E

Re: New Developer Suggestion

Hi Scott Your offer is highly appreciated even if the feedback to your initial mail was a bit sparse. :-) We're all struggling for time to work on FOP and gladly take any helping hand. On 09.10.2002 17:15:21 Sauyet, Scott (OTS-HAR) wrote: > > = Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> = Scot

Re: Fw: Arabic characters and FOP

patrick andries wrote: > I'm willing to help (slowly) implementing the bidi support > (contextualisation and bidi algorithms). Is someone else busy doing it ? Is > the time ripe to do so ? Implementation of bidi algorithm itself is not a problem as java has already bidi support since jdk1.3 (it's

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13464] New: - part of word missing when broken across pages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: FO WYSIWYG-Editor Project launched @ Sourceforge

patrick andries wrote: >>>where do I sign-up!? >> >>People, don't take it wrong, but you know, it's *fop*-dev list actually :) > Well, where should they go ? http://sourceforge.net/projects/prettypress I presume. It's now different project with own maillists etc. -- Oleg Tkachenko eXperanto t

Re: FO WYSIWYG-Editor Project launched @ Sourceforge

- Message d'origine - De : "Oleg Tkachenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envoyé : 9 oct. 2002 12:53 Objet : Re: FO WYSIWYG-Editor Project launched @ Sourceforge > Mark Malone wrote: > > where do I sign-up!? > People, don't take it wrong, but you know, it's *fop*-dev list

Re: FO WYSIWYG-Editor Project launched @ Sourceforge

Mark Malone wrote: > where do I sign-up!? People, don't take it wrong, but you know, it's *fop*-dev list actually :) -- Oleg Tkachenko eXperanto team Multiconn International, Israel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: FO WYSIWYG-Editor Project launched @ Sourceforge

where do I sign-up!? -M On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, at 09:03 AM, Vaidya, Raghavendra (CORP, GEITC) wrote: > I am jumping straight in...let me know how to gt into the project and > start > contributing > > -Original Message- > From: Marc D. Migge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: We

Fw: Arabic characters and FOP

I'm willing to help (slowly) implementing the bidi support (contextualisation and bidi algorithms). Is someone else busy doing it ? Is the time ripe to do so ? > > - Message d'origine - > > De : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > (See attached file: example.fo) > > (See attached file: fo

RE: FO WYSIWYG-Editor Project launched @ Sourceforge

I am jumping straight in...let me know how to gt into the project and start contributing -Original Message- From: Marc D. Migge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FO WYSIWYG-Editor Pr

RE: fonts

Jeremias Maerki wrote: > I'm talking mainly about font metrics at the moment. There are several > areas to the whole discussion though: > - font metrics (has an effect on the layout/appearance) > - available fonts (different font types and sources, different quality > of information) > - font e

RE: New Developer Suggestion

> = Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> = Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Does anyone have a suggestion about something I could look at fixing / >> enhancing which is not mission-critical, but which might give me a chance >> to look at a fair bit of the code? > The integration of jfor

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4002] - TTFReader unable to handle 3 of 9 Barcode font

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

FO WYSIWYG-Editor Project launched @ Sourceforge

Hi, I wanted to let you know that I successfully registered a FO-editor-project at Sourceforge yesterday. I'm _not_ trying to compete with Paul's ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I just thought there might have been some problems with his registration. My request was approved within 4 hours. I have alr

Bug handling survey - Tree based models

Hello FOP contributors, I am conducting a survey about the way bugs are handled in open source software projects. The survey includes questions that can be answered by developers,testers, bug fixers, project managers, and owners of defect databases. It is only and only for research purposes and

Re: New Developer Suggestion

Hi Scott, On Wednesday 09 October 2002 16:20, Sauyet, Scott (OTS-HAR) wrote: > Does anyone have a suggestion about something I could look at fixing / > enhancing which is not mission-critical, but which might give me a chance > to look at a fair bit of the code? The integration of jfor (www.jfor

RE: New Developer Suggestion

Me: > So what I was hoping for is a suggestion for something that I can work > on that might be useful, but not critical to any immediate plans, > ideally something that overlaps little with currently active portions of > the project. There were no replies yesterday. Does anyone have a sugge

Progress report on FOP 1.0 ?

When last updated, on the 10th of June 2002, it was stated that the development effort is roughly 35% towards a developers release. May I ask, four months later, if the baby is growing well ? P. Andries - To unsubscribe, e-m

Extensions to make PPoint like presentations

Hello, here is an interesting link: http://www-sp.iti.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/software/ppower4/ It seems that the pdf format allows also to create some interesting effects usefull when doing presentations. Take a look at the examples in that link. It would be interesting to add the capacity of

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13450] - FOP0.20.4 embedded rendering throws exception

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

AW: BARCODE

Why not a fast, flexible and reliable solution? 3 things are needed: o Java routines to calculate barcode rectangles and label areas depending from barcode type and its parameters. Possibly such routines are freely available. Otherwise: give me the specs, I will write the code (the nowadays popul

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13451] New: - rendering of SVG with "strokeSVGText" = false causes exception

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12630] - resizing images

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13450] New: - FOP0.20.4 embedded rendering throws exception

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b