Re: Integration of TIFFRenderer in FOP

Send an e-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be sure to use the e-mail address from which you subscribed. On Mar 8, 2005, at 4:03 PM, vivek gupta wrote: How to leave this group. Please help me to unsubscribe. --- "Peter B. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Renaud Richardet wrote: Oleg, I'm currently workin

Re: Integration of TIFFRenderer in FOP

On Mar 8, 2005, at 7:23 AM, Renaud Richardet wrote: I think it would be a good idea to integrate your TIFFRenderer, as you propose in [2]. Would you like to integrate it yourself? Otherwise I would like to do it. I think that would be great! Just be careful when you do, that the output isn't res

Re: Skype-conference on page-breaking?

I'd be happy to 'participate' although I don't have a skype acct yet. I don't know what I can offer, but I'm here to help! Cheers! On Mar 1, 2005, at 2:31 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Maybe I could hook you into a Skype conference by using SkypeOut. It's pretty cheap to call to the Netherlands. Ac

Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/flow TableBody.java

On Feb 24, 2005, at 10:21 PM, Glen Mazza wrote: --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have nothing more to say about this. I want to spend my time on more productive things now. Jeremias, I'm going to veto (-1) your change. I would like the content model restored to the XSL standard and

Re: Renaming the AWT Renderer to Java2D Renderer

On Feb 23, 2005, at 3:51 PM, Glen Mazza wrote: I know...sad thing is, you're the closest committer to me and California is thousands of miles away! (We can meet halfway though...perhaps Pittsburgh would be good... ;) Glen With my luck, we'd still be on opposite sides of the continent! Would that

Re: Renaming the AWT Renderer to Java2D Renderer

On Feb 23, 2005, at 7:28 AM, Victor Mote wrote: Renaud Richardet wrote: Your note sounded hard to me. My apologies to you and the other members of the team. In the future i'll use standard English. Please do not take my writing style as a sign of misrespect, as this was NOT my intention. This style

Re: Renaming the AWT Renderer to Java2D Renderer

On Feb 22, 2005, at 8:16 AM, Glen Mazza wrote: --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now that we've got someone who will work on the AWT Renderer I'd like to know if someone is against renaming the AWT Renderer to Java2D Renderer. "AWT Renderer" has a rich history within FOP, it's a popula

Re: Renaming the AWT Renderer to Java2D Renderer

On Feb 21, 2005, at 11:03 PM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: So here are the proposed changes: - Package org.apache.fop.render.awt becomes org.apache.fop.render.java2d - AWTRenderer.java becomes Java2DRenderer.java (AWT*.java -> Java2D*.java) I think the viewer subpackage can stay as is under the renamed

Re: another nose for the grindstone

On Feb 21, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Renaud Richardet wrote: bonjour fop-devs Salut! Bienvenue! i would like to work on the awt renderer. Mark (or someone else) , are you working on it? i checked out the code from FOP 0.20.5. is it the latest maintenance version? thanks, renaud Actually, the fop-0.20.5 c

Re: need to update team page

len Mazza wrote: Thanks for updating the site, and also thanks for teaching us how to fish here. I will do this next time I need an update to occur. Glen --- The Web Maestro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 11, 2005, at 12:30 PM, Glen Mazza wrote: Clay, I have a favor to ask--when you have

Re: need to update team page

On Feb 11, 2005, at 12:30 PM, Glen Mazza wrote: Clay, I have a favor to ask--when you have the chance, would you please republish the FOP team page with my recent changes? Much appreciated! I've updated the FOP Team page (HTML & PDF). FYI (and FMI), the quick and dirty way to generate a new page (

Re: need to update team page

sure... (dusting off forrest knowledge...) On Feb 11, 2005, at 12:30 PM, Glen Mazza wrote: Clay, I have a favor to ask--when you have the chance, would you please republish the FOP team page with my recent changes? Much appreciated! Thanks, Glen Web Maestro Clay -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

Re: Page breaking [was: Markers added to the wrong page]

On Feb 7, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Victor Mote wrote: The Web Maestro wrote: I don't know how the spec deals with this, but I doubt the spec cares which algorithm is used. That said, would it be a good idea to determine which algorithm to use based on something in userconfig.xml or something? I

Re: Page breaking [was: Markers added to the wrong page]

On Feb 7, 2005, at 7:21 AM, Luca Furini wrote: Finn Bock wrote: Using your description as a jumping point, here is my ideas for page breaking. I suppose it is even more pie-in-the-sky since I haven't yet written anything about it. As I have been doing a few experiments about page breaking, I'm happ

Glad you're still here! (was Re: Start using *-position traits?)

COMPLETELY OT... On Feb 4, 2005, at 9:04 AM, Victor Mote wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: I don't share his opinion on point 3 because whenever we have a change in reference-orientation we also have a new reference-area which establishes a new coordinate system. So I don't think it will be complicate

Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/test/layoutengine/testcases normal-breaking2.xml

On Feb 2, 2005, at 2:14 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: No, it don't think so. That bug happens in getNextBreakPoss() while mine happens in addAdreas(). I thought it was called addAndreas(to,,list-of-folks,to,send,big,thanks) ;-) Web Maestro Clay -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -

Re: FOP status

Ilya, NOTE: This message does not reflect a decision of the FOP Development Team. Rather it is my own thoughts on the subject. If there are any mistakes or inaccuracies in my thinking or reasoning, I hope the FOP Team will let us know. My goal is to give Ilya and other an answer on this importa

Re: block-containers with BPD set

We can't unsubscribe you. To unsubscribe, you need to send an e-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Maestro Clay On Jan 26, 2005, at 1:16 PM, Feifei Lu wrote: please remove my email address in this list. Thanks. --- Victor Mote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: In either case it seem

Re: Background images

On Jan 20, 2005, at 2:19 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Team, I'm going to implement background images as one of my next steps. I found that even in 1.1 WD there's no way to scale the background image. Should we skip that or should we define our own properties? Maybe Glen wants to talk to the WG about

Re: Another Future User Reporting In

On Jan 17, 2005, at 8:46 AM, Paul Hill wrote: Web Maestro Clay, You can add my name to the list of people who intend to use FOP as part of a larger product/service... FOP has a perfectly positioned functionally to meet the needs of may application developers We are very interested in you

Re: Stability Question

Charles, I believe this is more a question for [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED] to subscribe), but... On Jan 17, 2005, at 8:30 AM, Charles Griswold wrote: I've considering embedding FOP is a product I'm developing. How stable and complete is the puppy? One of my clients found it stable enough

Re: marketing Defoe

Peter, FWIW, I was shocked by the tone of your statement as well. Not so much by any misleading or such. Rather, it was more in the way that I'm shocked by the manner that, in the US companies can discuss differences with other products in their advertisements. Had you also 'advertised' FOray i

Re: Unsubscribe

We can't do it for you. You have to do it yourself. Instructions are here: http://xml.apache.org/fop/dev/index.html#mail-fop-dev But all you need to do, is send an e-mail here *from the e-mail address with which you subscribed* (presumably [EMAIL PROTECTED]): [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Jan 13, 2005

Re: New year -> update copyright years

I've updated the copyright years for http://xml.apache.org/fop/ but I noticed a different glitch in my xmlgraphics logo. It says xmlgraphics, but it shows xml.apache.org/ (ahem! now who can I blame this on? ;-)). Anyway, I'll fix that little one soon... Also, the "Group" link is still to Apache

Re: Merry Christmas everyone!

On Dec 23, 2004, at 11:56 AM, Glen Mazza wrote: Merry Christmas! Buon Natale! Vrolijk Kerstfeest! Glædelig Jul! Froehliche Weihnachten! Zalig Kerstfeest!/Joyeux Noël! (OK, think I got everybody... ;-) Regards, Glen Thanks Glen! And (just to be complete...): Happy Chanukah! Happy Kwanzaa! Happy Win

Re: replace extension bookmarks with XSL 1.1 ones?

sounds good to me... +1 On Dec 12, 2004, at 8:01 AM, Glen Mazza wrote: Team, Silly confirmation question here -- is the 1.1 XSL Spec's fo:bookmark-tree, fo:bookmark, and fo:bookmark-title [1] basically the same thing as our fox:bookmarks, fox:outline, and fox:title, respectively? (i.e., they're f

Re: Unnecessary zipping and backups?

On Nov 25, 2004, at 2:56 AM, Christian Geisert wrote: The Web Maestro wrote: [..] On a similar note, I am 'contemplating' committing the xml-fop/build/ folder ('built' by apache-forrest-0.6). My reasoning for this is two-fold: 1. it contains the FOP web site (which I

Re: Good news: Jeremias has been elected as an ASF member!

On Dec 1, 2004, at 2:48 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi FOP people, I have the great pleasure to announce that Jeremias Maerki has been elected as an ASF member at the last member's meeting during ApacheCon. Congratulations Jeremias! And to ASF as well! Jeremias is a hard-worker, and ASF is fo

Re: FOP Web site updated

On Nov 28, 2004, at 2:10 PM, bearklaw wrote: Minor bug for you. On the Resources page, "Other products" section, the links for FOray and Defoe are backwards. Clicking on Defoe takes you to the FOray home, and vice-versa. BTW, should issues like this be sent to this list, posted in Bugzilla, s

Re: Preview for a general XSL-FO processing API

This all sounds great to me. I like the sound of it very much. As for the javadocs stuff, there's ongoing discussion on the Forrest DEV list[1] which discusses 'RAW' files (the category in which Javadocs fall). Since that isn't ready yet, perhaps we'll have to go for some other javadocs imp

Re: For our American readers...

On Nov 25, 2004, at 9:09 AM, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: Happy Thanksgiving! (--that is the 25th, right? :-P) Greetz, Andreas I would consider it not just for Americans, but I also give thanks for the entire FOP community which gives so much, and takes so little! Cheers! Web Maestro Clay -- <[EMAI

Re: Unnecessary zipping and backups?

On Nov 24, 2004, at 5:19 PM, Peter B. West wrote: Clay, Let me say, Clay, thank you *very*, *very* much for taking care of the alt-design tab. Have I drawn your attention to the fact that I am *very happy* that you have taken care of this? (I have thanked Clay personally out-of-band for his wor

Re: Unnecessary zipping and backups?

On Nov 24, 2004, at 1:39 PM, The Web Maestro wrote: On Nov 24, 2004, at 1:16 PM, Glen Mazza wrote: Also, the output on minotaur should be viewable via ViewCVS anyway, correct? (We were doing manual updates to the website to fix the breadcrumb issue--we went through ViewCVS to find the correct

Re: foundation page updated

On Nov 24, 2004, at 1:36 PM, Glen Mazza wrote: XML Graphics is now listed on the foundation page, thanks to David Crossley/Forrest Team: http://www.apache.org/foundation Glen Looks like the listed us, but didn't add us to the links in the site nav. In addition, does it make sense to add XML Graphi

Re: Unnecessary zipping and backups?

On Nov 24, 2004, at 1:16 PM, Glen Mazza wrote: For #1) Wouldn't we have to keep doing that whenever a change is made to the website as a result? I'm concerned with it falling out of sync with the production website. True, and this is a significant concern. Whomever updated the web site would have

Re: Unnecessary zipping and backups?

On Nov 24, 2004, at 11:52 AM, The Web Maestro wrote: On a similar note, I am 'contemplating' committing the xml-fop/build/ folder ('built' by apache-forrest-0.6). My reasoning for this is two-fold: 1. it contains the FOP web site (which I've spent a significant amount

Re: Unnecessary zipping and backups?

Yeah, Glen... On Nov 23, 2004, at 8:18 PM, Glen Mazza wrote: Clay, I'm noticing a lot of .zips and .bak backup files in our cvs directories [1] -- this seems unnecessary and a bit messy for a version control system, as everyone who "cvs checkout"s or "cvs updates" is now downloading these files.

Re: Adding competing products to FOP Resources page

On Nov 22, 2004, at 5:56 PM, Victor Mote wrote: Clay Leeds wrote: I'm contemplating adding the following products to the FOP Resources page: - FOray - Defoe ...while I'm at it, I might as well add: - RenderX - XEP - AntennaHouse - XSL Formatter Thanks for doing that Clay. I think this will be good