Hello!
Martijn Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > One motivation behind #207 is that with the current registration
> > proceudre, some portlets such as the Calendar will be available in every
> > new portlet column. An alternative way to handle this issue is by using
> > PLIP to #205 regist
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007, at 9:23 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
I can't seem to find what the exact deadline is for PLIPs; midnight is
mentioned, but in what timezone would that be? :-)
i'd say without explicit specification GMT applies.
it's up to the current team, of course, but
On Dec 14, 2007, at 10:20 PM, Tom Lazar wrote:
On 14.12.2007, at 21:18, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I want to propose PLIP 220: http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/220
+1
+1 from me, too. and btw, happy birthday, tom!! :)
andi
--
zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Dec 14, 2007, at 9:56 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Speaking of Timezone, did anyone write a PLIP about user-configurable
timezones
i didn't have a look at all the plips out there, but no such plip has
been submitted for plone 3.1 at least. so far, that is.
I've been meaning to write this
On Dec 14, 2007, at 9:23 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
I can't seem to find what the exact deadline is for PLIPs; midnight is
mentioned, but in what timezone would that be? :-)
i'd say without explicit specification GMT applies.
andi
--
zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Dec 14, 2007 9:18 PM, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to propose PLIP 220: http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/220
+1 from me.
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.p
On 14.12.2007, at 21:18, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I want to propose PLIP 220: http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/
220
+1
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things
simple.
_
On Dec 14, 2007 6:23 PM, Martijn Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't seem to find what the exact deadline is for PLIPs; midnight is
> mentioned, but in what timezone would that be? :-)
Speaking of Timezone, did anyone write a PLIP about user-configurable
timezones? I've been meaning to wr
I can't seem to find what the exact deadline is for PLIPs; midnight is
mentioned, but in what timezone would that be? :-)
--
Martijn Pieters
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framewor
I want to propose PLIP 220: http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/220
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
___
Framework-Team maili
I want to propose PLIP 219: New site search implementation
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/219
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
On Dec 14, 2007 10:12 AM, Florian Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:00:43 +0100, Alec Mitchell
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 14, 2007 5:36 AM, Florian Schulze
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:37:14 +0100, Alec Mitchell
> >> <[EMAIL P
Florian Schulze wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:03:03 +0100, Balazs Ree
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Framework Team,
we submitted the following plip:
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/215
We suggest to use the following new kss package versions for Plone 3.1:
kss.core
New ks
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:00:43 +0100, Alec Mitchell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 5:36 AM, Florian Schulze
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:37:14 +0100, Alec Mitchell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2007 9:27 AM, Florian Schulze
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On 14/12/2007, Alec Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2007 7:56 AM, Malthe Borch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > so, while i also like the idea, i'm not too sure if plone should ship
> > > with it. i'd agree with martin we should discuss and think this through
> > > a little furthe
On Dec 14, 2007 8:44 AM, Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Alec Mitchell wrote:
> > Hi framework team members,
>
> hi framework team pioneer,
>
> > A couple more PLIPs to keep you guys busy:
>
> thank you very much. :)
>
> > Adapterized local role lookup (bor
On Dec 14, 2007 5:36 AM, Florian Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:37:14 +0100, Alec Mitchell
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 12, 2007 9:27 AM, Florian Schulze
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi Framework Team!
> >>
> >>
> >> This is the other PLIP I want to
On Dec 14, 2007 7:56 AM, Malthe Borch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > so, while i also like the idea, i'm not too sure if plone should ship
> > with it. i'd agree with martin we should discuss and think this through
> > a little further. nevertheless, i don't see why the plip wouldn't be
> > accep
On Dec 14, 2007 9:11 AM, Alec Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adapterized local role lookup (borg.localrole):
> http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/208
>
> Adapterized workflow lookup:
> http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/217
Thanks for the great PLIPs :-)
+1 on both from me.
--
On Dec 14, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Alec Mitchell wrote:
Hi framework team members,
hi framework team pioneer,
A couple more PLIPs to keep you guys busy:
thank you very much. :)
Adapterized local role lookup (borg.localrole):
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/208
also very nicely written
so, while i also like the idea, i'm not too sure if plone should ship
with it. i'd agree with martin we should discuss and think this through
a little further. nevertheless, i don't see why the plip wouldn't be
acceptable, so +1 on that.
True. I say, let's think of z3c.jbot as inspiration an
On Dec 14, 2007 1:50 AM, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Malthe Borch wrote:
> > If this belongs in Plone, then it's pretty much ready for inclusion.
> >
> >http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/216
>
> I do quite like this approach. I think it brings back some of the
> "convention
On Dec 14, 2007, at 1:50 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Malthe Borch wrote:
If this belongs in Plone, then it's pretty much ready for inclusion.
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/216
customerize on the fs, so to say, nice! :)
My only concern would be whether this ties us into an implementat
On Dec 14, 2007, at 3:19 PM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007, at 3:45 PM, George Lee wrote:
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/207
btw, i've just rejected plip 206, as this obviously was an
(unfinished) duplicate of 207. maybe it should better be deleted, so
it won't appear in
On Dec 14, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007 3:45 PM, George Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've submitted two PLIPs for Plone 3.1 --
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/205
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/207
Excellent PLIPs, well written, thanks. +1 on both
On Dec 13, 2007, at 6:23 PM, George Lee wrote:
Despite this, I actually think it would be best
to explicitly register portlets like the calendar portlet for
IColumn and
IDashboard rather than relying on the current convention -- that if
a portlet is
registered for None, it appears in all por
On Dec 13, 2007, at 3:45 PM, George Lee wrote:
Hi,
hi george,
I've submitted two PLIPs for Plone 3.1 --
thanks.
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/205
+1 provided the new `getAddableTypes` can — like you suggested —
handle both singletons and tuples, so that no migration code is
On Dec 13, 2007 3:45 PM, George Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've submitted two PLIPs for Plone 3.1 --
> http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/205
> http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/207
Excellent PLIPs, well written, thanks. +1 on both from me.
> One motivation behind #207 is that
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:37:14 +0100, Alec Mitchell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 12, 2007 9:27 AM, Florian Schulze
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Framework Team!
This is the other PLIP I want to propose besides #213. Martijn did all
the
hard work for it already.
http://plone.org/prod
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
[..]
The configlet would benefit all Plone installations, not just the
unified installer, so we should treat it separately.
true, +1. raphael, could you quickly write that up?
I would prefer if someone else could do that, sorry.
I'm in the middle of an important work
On Dec 14, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
A bit unrelated, but should we maybe try to enhance our upgrade
story in
a way that we list required and optional steps in it and provide the
user with a way to select/deselect the optional steps?
i like the idea.
For cssQuery that won't
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Martijn Pieters wrote:
>> On Dec 13, 2007 5:13 PM, Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> so, +1 from me, provided we're gonna have the wrapper for cssQuery and
>>> an easy way to switch back to the old implementation and the original
>>> cssQuery in cas
On Dec 14, 2007, at 1:28 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 12:23 PM, Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And while we are at this:
Maybe we should add some information to the setup
configlet where we show the ZOPEHOME and such.
How about adding the path to the Python that's
used
On Dec 13, 2007 10:03 AM, Balazs Ree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/215
Having already talked with Balazs about what's in 1.4 in Napels, I'll
give this my +1 as well.
> About this last issue I have a particular question. If I do all this,
> still two things w
On Dec 13, 2007, at 1:19 PM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007, at 6:19 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
1. http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/184 - Ship additional
portlets
+1 as this is purely add-on functionality and contains no risks
other than maybe confusing users if done in a non-in
On Dec 14, 2007 12:23 PM, Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And while we are at this:
> > Maybe we should add some information to the setup
> > configlet where we show the ZOPEHOME and such.
> > How about adding the path to the Python that's
> > used and the egg directories etc.
>
> +1
On Dec 14, 2007, at 9:20 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Alec Mitchell wrote:
Yes, but that's something we should be trying to fix (with better
compression on the RR ot KSS side, or just by encouraging people to
enable mod_deflate on their apache setup). People are going to want
KSS-base
On Dec 14, 2007, at 8:53 AM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
What's more: I als tohink this is the only sane
way to support egg-based, third-party add-ons.
exactly, loads of people could test blobs and report bugs that way,
for example... ;)
And while we are at this:
Maybe we should add some informati
On Dec 13, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Balazs Ree wrote:
Dear Framework Team,
we submitted the following plip:
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/215
after talking to balazs about the changes between the current version
(1.2.4) and the new one (1.4), mostly clarifying what happened to 1.3
— th
Previously Alec Mitchell wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2007 12:02 AM, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Previously Alec Mitchell wrote:
> > > On Dec 12, 2007 9:27 AM, Florian Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi Framework Team!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This is the other PLIP I want to p
On Dec 14, 2007 12:02 AM, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Previously Alec Mitchell wrote:
> > On Dec 12, 2007 9:27 AM, Florian Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi Framework Team!
> > >
> > >
> > > This is the other PLIP I want to propose besides #213. Martijn did all the
> > >
Hi framework team members,
A couple more PLIPs to keep you guys busy:
Adapterized local role lookup (borg.localrole):
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/208
Adapterized workflow lookup:
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/217
Feedback appreciated.
Alec
___
Previously Martijn Pieters wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2007 5:13 PM, Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > so, +1 from me, provided we're gonna have the wrapper for cssQuery and
> > an easy way to switch back to the old implementation and the original
> > cssQuery in case anybody needs those...
Previously Alec Mitchell wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2007 9:27 AM, Florian Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Framework Team!
> >
> >
> > This is the other PLIP I want to propose besides #213. Martijn did all the
> > hard work for it already.
> >
> > http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/212
>
>
44 matches
Mail list logo
