Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
Actually, I didn't start this. Someone else brought up the idea.
...and quickly decided it was not worthwhile.
Yes, the developers do a good job of repressing
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 April 2000 at 9:39:10 +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Sunday, 23 April 2000 at 10:07:38 +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Greg Lehey wrote:
In the last few days, my remote serial
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Try buildworld on one machine and installworld on all of your production
boxes.. installworld only takes 10-20 minutes to run on my crappy IDE
disks.
Yes, that's what I'm doing now - so far the best method. But still
requires having N+1 boxes
On 26-Apr-00 Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Yes, that's what I'm doing now - so far the best method. But still
requires having N+1 boxes (which is not a concern for me, but for someone
having e.g. 2 boxes in production this represents 1/3 increment), plus
topology allowing for using NFS mounts.
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 09:33:46AM +0200, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Try buildworld on one machine and installworld on all of your production
boxes.. installworld only takes 10-20 minutes to run on my crappy IDE
disks.
Yes, that's what I'm doing now - so far the best method. But still
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, you wrote:
Any further discussion from you on this point that doesn't include code
is totally and completely without value. You haven't proven the value of
your suggestion to _anyone's_ satisfaction, so no one is going to do it
for you. So if you're not willing to
At 2:22 PM -0600 2000/4/25, Nate Williams wrote:
I consider you a very small minority. A user who is not a developer,
but who could be a developer. The amount of work it would take to
support your needs is way too much work, and it would only benefit
1-2% of the user base. Does this
At 1:32 PM -0700 2000/4/25, Matthew Hunt wrote:
Maintaining a CVS repository is necessary only if you are working
on the code, so your proposal would only affect devlopers, not Joe
User. Normal users do not maintain copies of the repository and do
not have a frequent need to examine
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 09:33:46AM +0200, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Try buildworld on one machine and installworld on all of your production
boxes.. installworld only takes 10-20 minutes to run on my crappy IDE
disks.
Yes, that's what I'm
Hi,
I've already submitted this crash report earlier but it seems that developers
in -current list are too busy discussing whether Matt allowed to commit his SMP
work into 4.0 to pay attention to "ordinary" panic reports :-(. Following is
slightly simplified course of actions which is known to
Does anyone know of a tutorial or more detailed instructions on how to use
NAT and IP masquerading in 3.4? I can configure it so that it is running
and working with IP firewall within the box no problem, but as far as
dolling out local IPs to the rest of the workstations or even building a
Hi,
After a (very) quick look at the source it looks like there's a missing
cdevsw_remove() missing from the MOD_UNLOAD/MOD_SHUTDOWN event handling
I haven't time to test it, but try this:
*** vn.c.oldWed Apr 26 16:23:03 2000
--- vn.cWed Apr 26 16:24:06 2000
***
***
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 12:24:59PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
Maintaining a CVS repository is necessary only if you are working
on the code, so your proposal would only affect devlopers, not Joe
User. Normal users do not maintain copies of the repository and do
not have a frequent
Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
You are correct that I "haven't proven" yet. Much of this is because the
audience doesn't relate to the problem because they don't see themselves
directly impacted by it. However, they are paying for it every time they use
cvsup or cvs.
"Frankly, my dear, I
At 8:50 AM -0700 2000/4/26, Matthew Hunt wrote:
In any case where somebody says "Y'all should do such-and-such"
without ponying up the code himself, we should be thinking about
whether the benefit to the users will "pay for" the time it takes
us to do it.
Sounds like a
Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, you wrote:
Any further discussion from you on this point that doesn't include code
is totally and completely without value.
You are correct that I "haven't proven" yet.
. . .
I'll sit back and wait...
To Unsubscribe: send
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 06:11:23PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
I am only guessing, but the way I read the original proposal
(which Richard has been advocating much more strongly than the person
who originally proposed it) sounded to me like it would benefit
anyone and everyone that
Sorry, I think that fix is incomplete (though it'll prolly stop the
crashes). I think there should be a destroy_dev() call for each created
device in the MOD_UNLOAD case also.
I'll make a patch and send-pr it once I get back to my home machine,
unless someone more experienced feels the need to do
Any getting these too?
ild-tools
cd /usr/src/bin/sh; make build-tools
cc -O -pipe -DSHELL -I. -I/usr/src/bin/sh -Wall -Wformat -c
/usr/src/bin/sh/mkinit.c
cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
Only people with dodgy memory or cache (probably memory).
--
Brian
Umm- doubt it, but I'll check. This system has been fine for the last 18
months and runs everything else just peachy.
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Brian Somers wrote:
Any getting these too?
ild-tools
cd /usr/src/bin/sh; make build-tools
cc -O -pipe -DSHELL -I. -I/usr/src/bin/sh -Wall
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
I've got this trap for several times and I really want to know what's
causing this. The first time was about a year ago and after no answer
I've not bothered to send out more questions about it. Anyway, several
people report it time-to-time, so it's
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 04:25:46PM +0100, Peter Edwards (local) wrote:
How about send-pr ing this stuff?
Wilko
Hi,
After a (very) quick look at the source it looks like there's a missing
cdevsw_remove() missing from the MOD_UNLOAD/MOD_SHUTDOWN event handling
I haven't time
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Matthew Jacob wrote:
Umm- doubt it, but I'll check. This system has been fine for the last 18
months and runs everything else just peachy.
Sudden SIGSEGVs are almost always the result of failed memory. The fact
that the machine worked fine for 18 months doesn't mean
Any getting these too?
ild-tools
cd /usr/src/bin/sh; make build-tools
cc -O -pipe -DSHELL -I. -I/usr/src/bin/sh -Wall -Wformat -c
/usr/src/bin/sh/mkinit.c
cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
Only people with dodgy memory or cache (probably memory).
Or
The linux emulation patch has been committed to -current, you must
recompile your linux emulation kld.
This patch will be MFC'd to 4.x on Friday.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
I often notice processes hanging forever on exit's ttywait when TCP
connection dropped. Here is a patch I plan to commit which restrict
waiting for output drain by 3 minutes. Any comments, improvements or
objections?
--- kern_exit.c.bak Sun Apr 16 23:35:55 2000
+++ kern_exit.c Thu Apr 27
:I often notice processes hanging forever on exit's ttywait when TCP
:connection dropped. Here is a patch I plan to commit which restrict
:waiting for output drain by 3 minutes. Any comments, improvements or
:objections?
:
:--- kern_exit.c.bakSun Apr 16 23:35:55 2000
:+++ kern_exit.c
Hi Jason,
This is really a -questions question, not a -current question.
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Jason Mitchell wrote:
Does anyone know of a tutorial or more detailed instructions on how to use
NAT and IP masquerading in 3.4?
"IP masquerading" is what the linux people call NAT. They are the
Thanks to all who mentioned failing memory- I don't think this was the case.
Installing a new source tree on a local directory instead of building on
top of NFS mounted /usr/src worked for me.
It's not clear what to make of this.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 02:22:47PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:I often notice processes hanging forever on exit's ttywait when TCP
I think this is a good idea. I've seen processes stuck in ttywait
forever too, usually when I'm using cu and the remote end is spewing
all sorts
There is a number of places this may occurse and all of them have no timeout
by default. F.e. if some terminal shell hangs in exit's ttywait, comsat
hangs on ttywrite and lots of comsats appearse after several hours. Alternative
solution will be adding
tp-t_timeout = 180 * hz;
On Wednesday, 26 April 2000 at 11:50:11 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
New patch at: http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/sys_kernel_h.patch
This patch removes 67 unneeded instances of #include sys/kernel.h
Comments, tests and reviews please.
Have you checked that there are no references which are
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 12:27:22PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
Why would "The Project" have to do anything? We've already established
this is of minority appeal,
Have we? Really? We have established that this is of minority
It seems to me that the typical assumption is that if
On 26-Apr-00 Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, you wrote:
Any further discussion from you on this point that doesn't include code
is totally and completely without value. You haven't proven the value of
your suggestion to _anyone's_ satisfaction, so no one is going to do
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, you wrote:
*Bzzzt*. Wrong. You only get the old history during the intial cvsup.
And since the most recent revisions are stored at the beginning of an RCS
file, you don't pay for this on cvs operations except for 'cvs log' and
other operations dealing with the
On 27-Apr-00 Richard Wackerbarth wrote:
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, you wrote:
*Bzzzt*. Wrong. You only get the old history during the intial cvsup.
And since the most recent revisions are stored at the beginning of an RCS
file, you don't pay for this on cvs operations except for 'cvs log' and
In message Pine.BSF.4.21.0004251617200.303-10@localhost Dave Belfer-Shevett
writes:
: Vendor ID AEI0218 (0x1802a904), Serial Number 0x01234567
You'll have to add this ID to the list of IDs in the pcic driver for
4.0. I'll try to do this when I get back if you can wait. And if you
can't
Haven't seen any discussion for quite some time. The Linux people seem to be
getting into a lather about it as well. Rehashing the issues like device
persistence, et cetera.
Is anyone doodling around with a sysctlfs?
Stephen
--
The views expressed above are not those of PGS
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Greg Lehey writes:
On Wednesday, 26 April 2000 at 11:50:11 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
New patch at: http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/sys_kernel_h.patch
This patch removes 67 unneeded instances of #include sys/kernel.h
Comments, tests and reviews please.
Have
Hi,
I've been idly watching this thread and decided to check
a few numbers Is it truly worth pruning?
I mirror the freebsd repository, mail archives, and
www site locally:
size 1.9Gig.
time 4:48minabout 2/5 gig per minute
ie: it takes about 5 minutes for the
On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Ron Klinkien wrote:
Any getting these too?
ild-tools
cd /usr/src/bin/sh; make build-tools
cc -O -pipe -DSHELL -I. -I/usr/src/bin/sh -Wall -Wformat -c
/usr/src/bin/sh/mkinit.c
cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
Only people with
Hi,
Today, we tried to create a 5Gig mfs. It turns out this is
not such a good idea. It turns out that support is basically
limited to an int. Extracts from some of the appropriate files
show some of the problems...
newfs.c:
int fssize; /* file system size */
42 matches
Mail list logo
