Re: CURRENT, usr/src on git, howto "mergemaster"?

On 04/01/2021 12:29, David Wolfskill wrote: Caveat: Since the switch, I have yet to encounter a case where I needed to merge a change in (e.g., because of a newly-created user, or there was a commit to /etc/crontab or /etc/newsyslog.conf). I may find things rather "more interesting" when that h

Re: what 3rd party boot mgr is required to boot multiple freebsd versions?

On 17/03/2020 12:58, Florian Limberger wrote: > On 16.03.20 23:33, Chris wrote: > >> For the record. I'm *only* using FreeBSD in this situation. I >> only mentioned Windows above, for the use of it's boot manager. > > If you only use FreeBSD, and also use ZFS, you might find beadm[1] > interestin

Re: Pkg repository is broken...

On 07/03/2020 22:38, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> This was only an issue on the "latest" branch. If you don't alter >> "/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf", you'll get packages from the "quarterly" >> branch, which fortunately wasn't affected. > No, this isn't necessarily correct. I have never modified this

Re: pkg: Cannot open /dev/null:No such file or directory

On 04/06/2019 06:32, O. Hartmann wrote: > As far as I know,, the package installation is performed via "chroot'ed" > environment and somehow /dev/null is out of a sudden not accessible anymore > while pkg tries to delegate some output to /dev/null. Assuming you're chroot'd to /chroot, then: m

Re: New vm-image size is much smaller than previos

On 03/05/2019 17:10, David Boyd wrote: The vm-image for 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20190503-r347033.vmdk is only 4.0 GB in size. Previous images were about 31.0 GB. This smaller image doesn't leave much room to add packages and other customizations. Yes, the V

Re: Sharing compiled builds between multiple 12-CURRENT boxes.

On 19/08/2018 01:55, Shane Ambler wrote: >> I run 12-CURRENT on few machines, some more powerful that other (all >> of them x86_64, march varies). > You can use freebsd-update by setting up your own update server > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/freebsd-update-server freebsd-upgrade(8)

Base FreeBSD-lld package dependency problems...

Here's a little glitch with packaged base I stumbled upon. On a freshly pkg upgrade'd 12-current machine, I see: codling:/usr/home/matthew:# pkg info -dr FreeBSD-lld-12.0.s20180609030436 FreeBSD-lld-12.0.s20180609030436 Depends on : FreeBSD-runtime-12.0.s20180609030436 So, no depende

Re: Newbie q [repost]

On 01/10/2017 13:22, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: > I've a uname-a : STABLE-11 that svn's to 12-HEAD and will not buildworld > despite > 'make cleanworld ' and '/bin/rm -rf /usr/obj/usr' both... and src.conf and > make.conf removed from /etc. > ... > libmap.conf problem? > u

Re: Critique this plan?

On 2017/07/20 11:22, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: > It seems I've a brick wall [too many ports to use pkg effectively ] -- [ > 3551 ] > and too many need ' pkg lock ' in ' v11 ' for ino64 fixes, 12.0-CURRENT, and > quite a few > others fail to build from ports, either compiler, so are also 'pkg lock

Re: Ports not building due to release not supported

On 13/04/2017 21:50, mmu...@xtra.co.nz wrote: > I am unable to build ports as I am getting the error message – > Ports Collection support for your FreeBSD version has ended, and no ports are > guaranteed to build on this system. Please upgrade to a supported release. > > But my version is > FreeB

Re: Log spam: Limiting * response from 1 to 200 packets/sec

On 2016/12/13 15:43, Michael Butler wrote: > On 12/13/16 10:29, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >> Somebody is most likely port scanning your machines. I see this all the >> time on boxes connected to the internet. > > As are mine. I wouldn't mind so much if the message contained sufficient > useful inf

Re: CURRENT: pkg broken on r309320

On 2016/11/30 12:14, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:10:31PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 2016/11/30 10:14, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> revert r309314 the issue is there: >>> >>> The ports tree defines PKG_CMD as pkg register b

Re: CURRENT: pkg broken on r309320

On 2016/11/30 10:14, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > revert r309314 the issue is there: > > The ports tree defines PKG_CMD as pkg register but now bsd.own.mk predefines > it > to simply pkg. > > There is a collision there. > Pointy hat to me. I'll revert that commit. Matthew signatur

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] HEADS-UP: OpenSSH DSA keys are deprecated in 12.0 and 11.0

On 09/08/2016 03:23, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: > Will/could there be some kind of UPDATING announcement re which files > explicitly to switch out/remove/replace/checkfor etc the deprecated > lines and precisely the steps to replace with new or some other > suitable action? Action required for both the

Re: HEADS-UP: OpenSSH DSA keys are deprecated in 12.0 and 11.0

On 08/05/16 03:09, Glen Barber wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 01:59:18AM +, Glen Barber wrote: >> This is a heads-up that OpenSSH keys are deprecated upstream by OpenSSH, >> and will be deprecated effective 11.0-RELEASE (and preceeding RCs). >> > > Stupid editor mistake. OpenSSH DSA keys ar

Re: Oversight in /etc/defaults/rc.conf

On 07/12/16 13:27, Glen Barber wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 07:17:19AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> I just upgraded my main machine to 11-STABLE. Things are mostly working >> fine -- however I did notice that the new iovctl rc script is apparently >> enabled by defaul

Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE

On 07/12/16 06:48, Kevin Oberman wrote: > In case people are not aware of it, Russian law now requires ALL encrypted > traffic must either be accessible by the FSB or that the private keys must > be available to the FSB. I have always assumed that GOST has a hidden > vulnerability/backdoor that the

Oversight in /etc/defaults/rc.conf

I just upgraded my main machine to 11-STABLE. Things are mostly working fine -- however I did notice that the new iovctl rc script is apparently enabled by default. That seems like a trivial omission: Index: etc/defaults/rc.conf ===

Re: [CFT] ypldap testing against OpenLDAP and Microsoft Active Directory

On 09/06/2016 18:34, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > There is still value to ypldap as it is now, and getting feedback from > users (especially Active Directory) would be very useful. > If someone could document a configuration which uses IPSEC or OpenSSH > forwarding, that would be nice. > > In future,

Re: why 100 packages are evil

On 23/04/2016 17:19, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message , Lyndon > Neren > berg writes: > >> With freebsd-update, an announcement comes out that says 'update'!. So we >> do. Move from 10.2-p11 to 10.2-p12. There is a very clear track record >> of why and how this happened. > >

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

On 04/20/16 10:48, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > While number of packages don't see outside internal -- this is > irrelevant. > After possibility of update individual package -- nuber of packages is > impotant. > Take fresh 11.0. Before 11.1 update only kernel. What you system have? > 11.0? 11.1-RC3

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

On 20/04/2016 06:12, Daniel Eischen wrote: > [And it really bothers me that FreeBSD 'pkg list' behaves > like 'pkg files' or similar should. It seems intuitive > that 'pkg list' should list the packages, not all the files > in all the packages.] 'pkg list' is one of the aliases defined in the

Re: zfsboot patch for /usr

On 10/03/2016 01:02, Freddie Cash wrote: > Set mountpoint=none if you just want to create the parent dataset without > actually using it for storage. Then you can set properties on it, and child > datasets will inherit then. Like pool/usr/local Usually, you want the mountpoint to be one of the inh

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

On 03/02/16 23:54, Glen Barber wrote: > Also note (as repeated below), running 'pkg delete -a' will implicitly > remove base system packages after they are installed. This has the potential for many feet to be shot, given that up to now, 'pkg delete -a' would always leave you with a viable system.

Re: "libssl.so.8" not found

On 14/12/2015 07:18, Matthias Apitz wrote: > I don't know why pkg 1.6.2 was produced with this recent libssl.so.8; it > should have been done more conservative, IMHO pkg(8) for HEAD just gets built against whatever is in recent HEAD. Even though it can lead to problems like this when a shlib ABI v

Re: pkg does not update the repo catalogue

On 12/07/15 11:42, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Maybe I wasn't clear enough. I copied only the packages to the new > system (my netbook) some weeks ago, and created the catalogue with > > # pkg repo /usr/PKGDIR.20150726 > > and installed the packages; Today I built 8 packages more, copied them > over

Re: pkg does not update the repo catalogue

On 12/07/15 11:04, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Now 'pkg -vv' shows only myrepo; the 'pkg upgrade -f' ended up with > reinstallation of all ~1000 packages; Ooops. 'pkg upgrade -f' says 'reinstall everything' -- which was an error on my part. I meant to type 'pkg update -f' which only refreshes the rep

Re: pkg does not update the repo catalogue

On 12/07/15 08:50, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hello, > > This is with 11-CURRENT and ports from July this year; I have the > packages which I build with poudriere on some other host in a dir > /usr/PKGDIR.20150726 and added 8 new packages there, the total number is > now 1691: > > # ls *.txz | eg

Re: Segmentation fault running ntpd

On 10/30/15 09:32, Franco Fichtner wrote: > Well, it’s on stable/10 since September 16 and somebody reported that > this particular branch would not trigger the crash along with HEAD, > but any 10.x would. Can’t find the reference right now though. That was me, amongst others. There are threads

Re: r286615: /usr/libexec/ftpd broken!

On 08/14/15 12:45, O. Hartmann wrote: > Man page "ftpusers(5)" states, that an entry "username allow" will allow > access > to ftpd. But every user listed in /etc/ftpusers is denied access, no matter > whether there is "allow" appended to the entry or not! This is strange. > Whenever I delete a us

Re: Proposal: make portsnap generate INDEX-${OSREL:R} only by default

On 08/07/15 09:40, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Of course, if you're using custom options, then the ports tree you the ports *INDEX* D'Oh! Matthew signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Proposal: make portsnap generate INDEX-${OSREL:R} only by default

On 08/07/15 05:11, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Isn't rebuilding the index useful for people running STABLE? I assume that > I need a current index to get useful output from "pkg version -vL=". I am > probably a bit unusual in that I keep a current ports tre on a STABLE > system, but there are a couple o

Re: "broken" symbolic links in /usr/lib

On 29/07/2015 05:48, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > Gary Palmer wrote: > >> As best that I can recall, the permissions of the directory underneath >> the mount point has been causing problems like this for as long as I've been >> using FreeBSD, which is over 20 years at this point. It's certainly >

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] pkg 1.3.0 out!

On 23/07/2014 19:38, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I think one bullet was a bit mangled in French->English translation, > though. What does "The unicity of a package is not anymore origin" mean? I > have a couple of guesses, but I am not really sure. Ithink the best > translations would be "The unicity of

Re: 11.0-CURRENT #1 r267422: OpenLDAP fails to startup out of the blue after buildworld

On 12/06/2014 22:37, Steven Hartland wrote: > According to that useless "suggestion" to restore from backup, I > restored the configuration and the users from backups. slapadd works > fine. But then starting the server fails again. What user ID did you use to run slapadd as? It's a common mistake

Re: portmaster/pkg still populating /var/db/pkg/

On 04/05/2014 09:46, Marc UBM wrote: > After my last port rebuild (libxml, libxcb, etc.) I realized that > portmaster is still populating /var/db/pkg with the old db scheme (i.e. > one directory for each port). At the same time, local.sqlite exists and > is up to date (I can query the db via pkg ju

Re: gptzfsboot problem on HP P410i Smart Array

On 09/04/2014 22:52, Rainer Duffner wrote: > And no, as the server is in a remote datacenter, an USB-stick is not an > option. > > It’s slow enough booting via a virtual USB-image over iLO... Uh... it only has to read the kernel+modules from the USB stick one time while booting. Otherwise, ther

Re: gptzfsboot problem on HP P410i Smart Array

On 09/04/2014 22:17, Rainer Duffner wrote: > Hi, > > I found this old thread…. > > I can’t boot FreeBSD 10 installed with zfsroot on a DL380G7 (P410i > controller). > I tried the installer and I tried installing with mfsbsd10se. > System has 48GB RAM. > > Is there a PR for this? > > > Now, I’

Re: docbook and old package management

On 18/02/2014 18:16, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:31:15 pm Michael Butler wrote: >> Seems the old package management went EOL *way* before September .. none >> of the docbook ports install now :-( >> >> [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 183 packages >> found (-1 +0

Re: PACKAGESITE spam

On 22/12/2013 16:08, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 22/12/2013 14:55, olli hauer wrote: >> What I agree is having it would be nice to have dedicated syslog >> (like yum.log) instead /var/log/messages since this is already >> spammed by most every process. > > Add

Re: PACKAGESITE spam

On 22/12/2013 14:55, olli hauer wrote: > What I agree is having it would be nice to have dedicated syslog > (like yum.log) instead /var/log/messages since this is already > spammed by most every process. Add something like this to /etc/syslog.conf: !pkg *.* /var/log/pkg.log C

Re: problems with pkg2ng

On 29/11/2013 02:02, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > in the near past, when I update ports repository via svn, I always use > pkg2ng to upgrade (or update?) the database, but today I can not do it. Uh? pkg2ng is a one time thing. Its only use is when converting a system that had previously used

Re: pkg(1) ipv6 address not listening

On 22/11/2013 07:19, Stanisław Halik wrote: > Hey, > > On Fri November 22 2013 07:15:00 Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> pkg(1) doesn't like ipv6 from two different subnets: >>> | ^C15720: connect(6,{ AF_INET6 [2001:41c8:112:8300::50:1]:80 },28) ERR#4 >>

Re: pkg(1) ipv6 address not listening

On 22/11/2013 01:58, Stanisław Halik wrote: > Hey, > > pkg(1) doesn't like ipv6 from two different subnets: > > | ^C15720: connect(6,{ AF_INET6 [2001:41c8:112:8300::50:1]:80 },28) ERR#4 > 'Interrupted system call' > > It's up fine, just not listening. Could you fix it, please? pkg(8) works fin

Re: cron(8) improvement

On 08/11/2013 04:51, Allan Jude wrote: > My use case is puppet etc, not ports/packages, so I'll leave the policy > about packages up to portsmgr@, I just want a less sloppy way to manage > crontabs with my orchestration system (and feature parity with Linux) There's two questions here: 1) Shou

Re: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng

On 02/11/2013 11:37, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> On 02/11/2013 10:15, Matthias Andree wrote: >>> I understand from Eric's pist that the issue is that through his >>> limiting proxies, the SRV are not available at all so he does not even >>> get to the point where he could get the pkgN.nyi.freebs

Re: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng

On 02/11/2013 10:15, Matthias Andree wrote: > I understand from Eric's pist that the issue is that through his > limiting proxies, the SRV are not available at all so he does not even > get to the point where he could get the pkgN.nyi.freebsd.org > name back. That doe

Re: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng

On 02/11/2013 01:55, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > This kind of proxy configuration is not uncommon. It would be awesome > if this would Just Work. It would remove an impediment to adoption, > which is especially important in the kind of environments that have this > kind of proxy configuration. > > S

Re: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng

On 31/10/2013 21:38, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 10/31/2013 4:25 PM, Eric Camachat wrote: >> > Same result, neither pkg+http:// nor http+pkg:// worked with proxy server. >> > > Top-posting kills babies > > pkg+http is NOT supported in 1.1 and as I said, changes nothing. Also the request that pkg(8

Re: Official FreeBSD Binary Packages now available for pkgng

On 31/10/2013 21:04, Allan Jude wrote: > I wonder if the http+pkg:// protocol can solve this, likely will require > a patch to fetch to implement the logic to do the dns lookup and make > the proxies request for the real hostname It's pkg+http:// or pkg+https:// or pkg+ssh:// or -- well, you get t

Re: Hang with nvidia-driver

On 13/08/2013 19:37, Alex wrote: > Hi. I just upgraded to revision 254271 and am experiencing a hang when slim > starts. The monitor goes blank (no signal) and the fans increase in speed, > suggesting high CPU usage. I have a GeForce GT 440. As suggested on the > forums, I tried setting "machdep.di

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

On 14/07/2013 11:12, Teske, Devin wrote: > Interesting. I notice that (while looking ahead to see a prefix: of > /usr/local in the +MANIFEST), the tarball itself has files that include > /usr/local in their path. Yes -- we consider the $PREFIX to be 'baked into' the package at compile time. You

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

On 14/07/2013 06:48, Teske, Devin wrote: > Question: Where can I learn more about the actual format of what's in > the new tarballs? This is going to be important not for bsdconfig, > but $work (we have our own build platform; I'm going to have to > rewrite it from mastering PLIST files to masterin

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

On 14/07/2013 04:18, Teske, Devin wrote: > ASIDE: For efficiency, I will actually need three things: (1) a list > of all packages (2) their descriptions and (3) their run-time dependencies. That would be the repository catalogue, which you can download by 'pkg update' (or it will happen automatic

Re: BSD sleep

On 29/05/2013 05:59, Michael Sierchio wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Joshua Isom wrote: > > >> You think it's trivial until you read this: >> >> http://infiniteundo.com/post/**25326999628/falsehoods-** >> programmers-believe-about-time

Re: Light humour

On 29/04/2013 10:40, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Daniel Kalchev wrote: >> >> On Apr 29, 2013, at 2:37 AM, Diane Bruce wrote: >> >>> http://www.softpanorama.org/Copyright/License_classification/social_roots_of_GPL.shtml >> >> By any measure a very good one. Could use some editing of course to make it

Re: [HEADS UP] pkgng binary packages regression in 1.0.9. Fixed in 1.0.9_1

On 20/03/2013 15:20, Matthias Gamsjager wrote: >> Due to the security incident, there are still no official FreeBSD >> packages. >> > > > Do you know what the status is on that issue? Unchanged so far. No official pkgng packages yet. However, an end to the wait is apparently in sight. There

Re: using multiple interfaces for same Network Card

On 12/03/2013 10:41, Yasir hussan wrote: > Thanks for notic but all the elebration was for make alias on one interface > but i want to have multiple interface, i can no where that some one would > have tring to creating new interfaces and using them, or may be i am > missing something, just send it

Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng

On 21/10/2012 10:33, Alex Keda wrote: > I try use it on my home server. > In make conf, I have >> > WITHOUT_X11=yes >> > NO_GUI=yes > I run pkg2ng, set mirror in pkg.conf > and, run > pkg upgrade -y > > It update some packages, and install ~20 new packages, named x* > > How I can say "It's s

Re: pkgng | portmaster

On 15/10/2012 18:13, Darrel wrote: > Hello, > > Concerning the new pkg system, I reckon that my port updates can take a > drought. > > Would it be best to deinstall portmaster for now? Portmaster typically > updates itself, but this might be a special case. > > Currently, my postmaster run ends

Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng

On 10/10/2012 23:20, Vincent Hoffman wrote: >> That's if you were to patch an already installed copy of portmaster. >> > The patch is designed to be placed in >> > >> > ${PORTSDIR}/ports-mgmt/portmaster/files/ >> > >> > so it would be applied as part of the normal process of building the >> > portm

Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng

On 10/10/2012 19:35, Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 10.10.2012 19:14, schrieb Matthew Seaman: >> On 10/10/2012 15:07, O. Hartmann wrote: >>> Is ports-mgmt/portmaster now dealing with pkgng? >> >> Not yet. bdrewery has taken over the portmaster port and pkgng >> rela

Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng

On 10/10/2012 15:07, O. Hartmann wrote: > Is ports-mgmt/portmaster now dealing with pkgng? Not yet. bdrewery has taken over the portmaster port and pkgng related updates are expected in the near future. Until then, you still need to follow the instructions here: https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/b

Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng

On 10/10/2012 17:43, Bruce Cran wrote: > On 10/10/2012 17:31, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Yes there is http://pkg.FreeBSD.org (no website in there no need to >> try to there) which will point you to pkgbeta.freebsd.org where some >> packages resides. > > On my systems pkg.freebsd.org doesn't seem

Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng

On 10/10/2012 16:52, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: > I read UPDATING, but I'm still not sure what this means when I use > ports and not packages. It means that if you're a user of HEAD, and you don't opt out by setting WITHOUT_PKGNG=yes in make.conf, then: * the next time you use the ports, ports-

Re: pkg (aka pkgng) 1.0 released

On 09/07/12 12:54, Matthew Seaman wrote: > It may also be possible to replicate what portupdate has done and use > geolocation based services to steer end users to a nearby repository > site automatically. D'Oh! I meant portsnap of course.

Re: pkg (aka pkgng) 1.0 released

On 09/07/12 12:30, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 06/09/2012 18:44, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 06/09/2012 16:37, Ivan Voras wrote: > >>> Hi, >>> >>> It looks like the pkg port installs pkg.conf.sample with the line: >>> >>> PACKAGESITE :

Re: pkg (aka pkgng) 1.0 released

On 06/09/2012 16:37, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 30/08/2012 16:19, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Since Julien Laffaye and I started pkgng lots of things has happened and >> here we >> are now. >> >> After 2 years of development (first commit "Tue Sep 7 2010"), more than 2000 >> commits, 43

Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap

On 02/09/2012 08:16, Doug Barton wrote: > On 09/01/2012 23:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> As rebuilding the repo database is something you'ld do routinely anyhow >> as part of normal maintenance > > Errr ... what? Why would this be true? Doesn't pkg keep the rep

Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap

On 02/09/2012 01:04, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Will new versions of pkgng support old packages? > > Some folks maintain their own package repositories and > will get rather grumpy if an update to pkgng requires them > to rebuild their entire repository. There's a distinction between the format of pkg

Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap

On 01/09/2012 18:43, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > In this scenario the ports tree needs to keep support for older releases, > but that's a consequence of the fact that there's only one ports tree for > all releases. Somewhere in between the ports and the various releases there > has to be some form enca

Re: Script to set/unset "automatic" status in PKGNG database

On 30/08/2012 22:44, John Nielsen wrote: > After dialog(1) exits the script has a list of packages to mark as > automatic. Is there a non-SQL way to efficiently get the inverse? > I.e. the set { all_packages - new_automatic_package_list } ? Use pkg query - it is really quite powerful. This shows

Re: portmaster and pkgng

On 23/07/2012 10:31, Hartmann, O. wrote: > portmaster now is not recognizing anymore the format of the /var/db/pkg > folder - for those considered the knowledged no surprise, for me simply > the indication that portmaster usage isn't usable as usual. You need to patch portmaster separately from in

Re: portmaster and pkgng

On 23/07/2012 09:43, Hartmann, O. wrote: > I'd like to try pkgng with portmaster. I see that "pkg2ng" is involving > the directory /var/db/pkg, so this implies that there may implications > also for usage with ports-mgmt/portmaster. portmaster is supposed to be > the tool completely dependend on s

Re: [HEADSUP & CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule

On 16/07/2012 05:22, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > It's one of reason why I do not agree to remove the shared library > version from the LIB_DEPENDS, so that way in future someone can add > support in the package to check on shared library version then prevent > package to install because it's not ABI

Re: [HEADSUP & CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule

On 16/07/2012 04:32, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2012-Jul-12 10:01:10 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> What is pkg >> --- >> pkg is a new package manager for FreeBSD. It is designed as a replacement for >> the pkg_* tools, and as a full featured binary package manager. > > A couple of spe

Re: [HEADSUP & CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule

On 13/07/2012 13:14, Fbsd8 wrote: > What I want to know is this new pkg system going to remove the > requirement of having the complete ports tree on my system? > > What I am looking for in an port system, is to install a port and any > files needed for the parent port and its dependents to automa

Re: PORTS_MODULES fix

On 09/06/2012 18:26, Chris Rees wrote: > On 9 June 2012 18:15, Doug Barton wrote: >> I have recently tried the PORTS_MODULES knob, and found a problem. The >> ports tree searches for some dependencies by finding a binary in PATH, >> and that fails since by default /usr/local/ isn't there. The atta

Re: UFS+J panics on HEAD

On 24/05/2012 00:05, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:58:48PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: >> > While it might be a shame to see FFS go by the wayside are there any >> > big reasons why you would rather stick with FFS instead of moving >> > to ZFS with all the benefits that brings?

Re: UFS+J panics on HEAD

On 24/05/2012 00:05, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:58:48PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: >> > While it might be a shame to see FFS go by the wayside are there any >> > big reasons why you would rather stick with FFS instead of moving >> > to ZFS with all the benefits that brings?

Re: [RFC] Un-staticise the toolchain

On 26/04/2012 20:01, Chris Rees wrote: > hydra# cd /usr/ports && time make MAKE=~crees/bin/make-static index > > Generating INDEX-9 - please wait.. Done. > 729.770u 120.841s 7:45.10 182.8%920+2676k 5251+116484io 7750pf+0w > > hydra# time make MAKE=~crees/bin/make-dynamic index > > Genera

Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run?

On 31/03/2012 03:05, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > P.S. I am somewhat unconvinced by this: > http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/RunDirectory Those who do not understand /var are condemned to reinvent it? -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey signature.as

Re: ABI/architecture identification for packages

On 19/03/2012 22:04, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 06:01:23PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> In order to identify architectures I need to find a uniq id for every >>> possibilities (for pkgng) >>> >>

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On 19/12/2011 08:27, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Here is one problem: we have choice from three items: > > (1) Make FreeBSD looks good on benchmarks by "fixing" FreeBSD > > (2) Make FreeBSD looks good on benchmarks by "fixing" Phoronix > (communication with them, convincing, that they benchamrks a

Re: FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 Available...

On 18/11/2011 10:53, Thomas Mueller wrote: > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_9 > > Am I screwed, am I OK, or do I simply have to rerun csup with RELENG_9_0 > instead of RELENG_9 ? Not screwed, but you'll be running 9.0-PRERELEASE rather than 9.0-RC2. If you want to switch to the 9.0-RELEASE bra

Re: Upgrade from source to RC1: problems with /etc : lost users and dbus

On 28/10/2011 11:05, Thomas Mueller wrote: > I still can't login as any nonroot user, even though I see the lines > in /etc/master.passwd, which I copied back from backup, and if I > startx as root, there is no response to keyboard or mouse. pwd_mkdb -p /etc/master.passwd Cheers,

Re: subversion-freebsd dependencies

On 06/10/2011 11:34, Andre Oppermann wrote: > On a newly installed development machine I installed subversion-freebsd > from ports and ended up with a huge dependency chain. Eventually I got > the usual gnu-hell (auto-*, lib*), but also python27, tcl-8.5, perl-5.12 > and m4. This is a bit too much.

Re: FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 or 3?

On 28/09/2011 10:28, Thomas Mueller wrote: > I looked at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ > > and found a BETA3 but only for some platforms not including i386 and amd64, > but that was yesterday. > > I looked later during the day and found the BETA3 for i386 and amd64. Yup. The stab

Re: ZFS V28

On 16/04/2011 00:26, George Kontostanos wrote: > http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/stable-8-zfsv28-20110317.patch.xz >> >> This patch failes at sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/sysmacros.h which i >> think should just be deleted. I tried deleting this file and then >> building produces s

Re: tzsetup disregards setting TZ to UTC

On 28/03/2011 12:08, Matthias Andree wrote: > Perhaps the installer should instead: > > display CMOS and system time, and ask which one of them is correct, and > offer a third option to actually correct the timezone or time if neither > is correct. > > That's much easier to grasp. ... and a 4th

Re: why panic(9) ?

On 12/01/2011 16:23, Erik wrote: > On one of my first linux desktops, I had a screensaver which displayed > rotated dumpscreens of all kinds of different Operation systems. Apple, > Basic, linux and BSOD.. (come to think about it BSD was not included) > I once had someone commiserate with me on h

Re: [Call for Tests] PAT issue on Apple hardware

On 22/11/2010 05:55, Matthew Seaman wrote: > lucid-nonsense:/:# zfs snapshot -r zr...@20101122-0549 > lucid-nonsense:/:# cd /.zfs/snapshot/20101122-0549 > /.zfs/snapshot/20101122-0549: Not a directory. > I can't reproduce this. False alarm. Sorry for the noise

Re: [Call for Tests] PAT issue on Apple hardware

On 21/11/2010 23:16, army.of.root wrote: > On 10\11\19 19:54, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> On Tuesday 16 November 2010 03:30 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >>> On Monday 15 November 2010 08:36 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: Often times I hear complaints like "my Mac hangs after upgrading to 8.1" or "snapshot CD

Re: /tmp and swap space

On 29/07/2010 16:35, gahn wrote: > is it possible to create /tmp directory under swap space? under > solaris, it is automatically created under swap unless one specifically > instructs the system not to do so.. Yes, this is certainly possible. Just add: tmpmfs="YES" tmpsize="32m" to /etc

Re: periodic script in base system to run csup

On 17/07/2010 24:04:38, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Alex Kozlov writes: > >> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 04:27:39PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >>> Em 2010.07.16. 16:23, Alex Kozlov escreveu: On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 03:58:33PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: Thousands pc simultaneously try t

Re: Regression in GSSAPI/libxh509 linking? [PR bin/147175]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/07/2010 23:26:03, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 06.07.2010, 21:00 Uhr, schrieb Matthew Seaman: > >> On 06/07/2010 15:14:28, Andrew Reilly wrote: >>> So: how should I "fix" this, properly, on my -current system? Is

Re: Regression in GSSAPI/libxh509 linking? [PR bin/147175]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/07/2010 15:14:28, Andrew Reilly wrote: > So: how should I "fix" this, properly, on my -current system? Is it > as simple as installing heimdal from ports? I can't remove openssl-1.0: > that has 191 ports listed in its REQUIRED_BY file. Rebuild t

Re: [TESTING]: ClangBSD branch needs testing before the import to HEAD

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 31/05/2010 16:03:07, Daniel Eischen wrote: > Is clangBSD able to support all our architectures? Does it > cross build for powerpc, mips, etc? Has it made a ports run > and does it successfully build and run most of our ports on > Tier-1 archs, and

Re: ports and PBIs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/04/2010 05:59:34, Robert Noland wrote: > On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 15:18 +0100, Bruce Simpson wrote: >> On 04/10/10 02:31, Julian Elischer wrote: >>> >>> Alfred Perlstein , Matt at ix systems Kris (Mr PBI), some >>> others and I, felt that these idea

Re: named (bind) in jail does not start

On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:23:48PM +0100, Axel S. Gruner wrote: > > Hi. > > I have configured named in jail (FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p10). > If i want to start named in the jail > > /usr/sbin/named > > i get this error message: > > opensocket_f: bind([0.0.0.0].53): Address already in use > > Ok

  1   2   >