Hello list,
Do we have already a tool equivalent to libux's ethtool?
Or does anybody here tried the linux's ethtool?
Thanks,
Elan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
Hello list,
Do we have already a tool equivalent to libux's ethtool?
Or does anybody here tried the linux's ethtool?
Thanks,
Elan
What specifically are you trying to accomplish?
Tuc
___
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:54:36 +0200
Antonio Évora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically it seems that it cant found /usr/local/bin/X because in fact
it doesnt exist. I would like to know which port/s do I have to
install for avoiding the meta port of xorg 7.2 which would install a
lot of things
Hi everybody,
I'm experiencing a minor problem with xfce4 - can't enable
reboot/shutdown options in the menu.
I had the following lines in my sudoers file (I used the second one):
1)
%groupnameALL = NOPASSWD:/usr/local/libexec/xfsm-shutdown-helper
2)
ALIAS_NAME ALL = (ALL) NOPASSWD:
Hi,
pid 96087 (conftest), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
I've been googling around and people say its usually a hardware
problem or memory. I've done memtest86+ on all of them and it returned
fine. (I know it doesn't mean there isn't a problem), HDD SMART is all
good. But I've been
Andriy Babiy wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm experiencing a minor problem with xfce4 - can't enable
reboot/shutdown options in the menu.
I had the following lines in my sudoers file (I used the second one):
1)
%groupnameALL = NOPASSWD:/usr/local/libexec/xfsm-shutdown-helper
2)
ALIAS_NAME ALL =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Elan marikit wrote:
Do we have already a tool equivalent to libux's ethtool?
ifconfig(8). In FreeBSD it's a lot more capable than in Linux.
Cheers,
Matthew
- --
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David N wrote:
pid 96087 (conftest), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
Are the conftest core dumps anything to worry about?
Actually, these are deliberate. GNU autoconf will engineer a SEGV
in a piece of test code in order to test
Hello my name is Chris McDonald
I am seeking out possible link partners that our visitors would be
interesting in visiting.
I've found your website (http://www.pl.freebsd.org/) to be a very good fit
for our visitors.
I would like to go ahead and add your link to our website, but before I do,
I
Hello,
When I went for FreeBSD, I chose the minimal distribution and as a result
do not have man pages. I would like to install them but when I specify an
fpt server (via sysinstall) I get:
Unable to transfer the manpages distribution from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org.
This is 6.2-RELEASE-p6 #4. I
On 2007-07-23 11:12, Zbigniew Szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
When I went for FreeBSD, I chose the minimal distribution and as a result
do not have man pages. I would like to install them but when I specify an
fpt server (via sysinstall) I get:
Unable to transfer the manpages
Hi,
When I went for FreeBSD, I chose the minimal distribution and as a
result
do not have man pages. I would like to install them but when I specify
an
fpt server (via sysinstall) I get:
Unable to transfer the manpages distribution from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org.
This is 6.2-RELEASE-p6 #4.
On 2007-07-23 11:31, Zbigniew Szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I went for FreeBSD, I chose the minimal distribution and as a
result do not have man pages. I would like to install them but when
I specify an fpt server (via sysinstall) I get:
Unable to transfer the manpages distribution
Dear Giorgos,
Thanks for your answer. You probably did not read my post. I do this
via sysinstall and it fails.
Ah, I apologize for that. You are right, of course; I misread at least
part of the original post. I obviously need more coffee before I am
fully aware of the reality around me
On 2007-07-23 12:26, Zbigniew Szalbot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/6.2-RELEASE/manpages/
[4] Run the 'install.sh' script as root:
Need to chmod it to have appropriate permissions but thank you! I now
enjoy man pages for all the default tools
In Mplayers makefile it says 'Wants Gnome' - does this mean that making it
would drag in all the gnome libs etc ? I was hoping for a text / cli mode
dvd player would work under X ? Also, does anyone know of a FreeBSd
version of MyBashBurn ? Thanks !
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 04:54:36 +0200
Antonio Évora [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I also ask you... when I
installed XFCE and GDM, Shouldnt have their dependencies already
installed the basics of xorg so I could run the X?
I'm not sure that they should, you might be building an application
server,
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:09:51 +0100 (BST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In Mplayers makefile it says 'Wants Gnome' - does this mean that
making it would drag in all the gnome libs etc ?
No it doesn't. It's more a matter co-ordinating with gnome.
___
Gary Kline schrieb:
Apologies for the triple postings, but this is general enough
for the -questions list and aimed at the gnome list. It
includes a query for the KDE list.
I just opened a konsole, the KDE-hacked xterm, IIRC. I had the
BEL set to system bell
On 23/07/07, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
David N wrote:
pid 96087 (conftest), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
Are the conftest core dumps anything to worry about?
Actually, these are deliberate. GNU autoconf will
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:07:43 -0400
Michael Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
A partner and I recently purchased a dedicated FreeBSD box. We're
currently using Plesk (blech!) to manage client domains and such.
I'm curious though as to what the best (most manageable) setup/
Florent Thoumie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yuri Pankov wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 02:21:09AM -0700, Dino Vliet wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm having problems with my monitor on freebsd. The vesa driver uses
1024X768 while the monitor is capable of doing 1680x1050.
Observed here as well:
I'm not totally opposed to what comes up in X if you start with no
.xinitrc, but it's a tad ugly. I'd ideally like to have a nifty
window manager, like one of those new 3d ones, but I find no point in
running kde/gnome/xfce - I launch everything (firefox, etc.) from a
prompt anyway. So howto? I
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:49:40AM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Gary Kline schrieb:
Apologies for the triple postings, but this is general enough
for the -questions list and aimed at the gnome list. It
includes a query for the KDE list.
I just opened a konsole, the
Hi,
I'm following the directions to upgrade Xorg (REALLY I AM, PROMISE!)
and I'm seeing this fly by my screen :
/usr/local/bin/bdftopcf -t lubR12-ISO8859-13.bdf | gzip
lubR12-ISO8859-13.pcf.gz
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1: Undefined symbol
serverClient
On Jul 22, 2007, at 9:04 PM, Olivier Nicole wrote:
With some delay, several answers together.
Very good. :-)
For the example I gave, I am of course authoritative.
Are you? Depending on which servers I query, I either get an
NXDOMAIN, an answer with no authoritative nameservers listed, or
Hi,
I'm following the directions to upgrade Xorg (REALLY I AM, PROMISE!)
and I'm seeing this fly by my screen :
/usr/local/bin/bdftopcf -t lubR12-ISO8859-13.bdf | gzip
lubR12-ISO8859-13.pcf.gz
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1: Undefined symbol
serverClient
oug wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Boudjema wrote:
Bonjour,
Please excuses,
my english is bad, so i will explain in french my problem if this is
not understood;
i have a problem to install x window. my hope is to install kde. but
without x, i am stopped; when i do pkg_add -r xorg, the response
Now i have the version 7.02 of xorg. when i do Xorg -config
/root/xorg.config, i have as response: could not read default font
fixed. what does it mean? what i must do?
I wonder if you might be having part of a problem I'm sure to
expect to have... Do this for me please to see if you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/23/07, Steve Franks wrote:
I'm not totally opposed to what comes up in X if you start with no
.xinitrc, but it's a tad ugly. I'd ideally like to have a nifty
window manager, like one of those new 3d ones, but I find no point in
running
So I got a copy of boot-only 6.2 onto cd and went back into the bios and
changed a few options:
LBA mode: off
Multi-sector transfers: auto
Fast PIO: auto
32 bit transfer mode: on
Ultra DMA: auto
then ran the 6.2 install using dangerously dedicated which went fine and
then on reboot now it comes
Dear folks,
whenever I try to attach gdb to my firefox settings because I'm expecting
firefox to be the source of my stability problems (I always find a gnash.core
and a firefox.core file in my home directory) I get the following error message:
gdb --quiet
(gdb) attach 11808
Attaching to
I have the Freebsd 6.2 version.
I got a problem installing from my DVD ROM drive, and I found a patch in
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/111084 .
I wonder if I could try this patch to solve my problem.
What may I do to get a FreeBSD with this patch working?
I need get the source
Hello RW
Am Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 10:16:50PM +0100 RW schrieb:
I read UPDATING and did all the steps described there.
No, you didn't because /usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries/Makefile contains
a little test to make sure you have read UPDATING.
No, it's not correct. I followed the steps from
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
snip
himinbjorg# ldd work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf
work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf:
libXfont.so.1 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1 (0x2808)
libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x280e6000)
WHY when the cc step is stating -L/usr/local/lib is it bring the
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:22:52 +0200
Martin Schweizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello RW
Am Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 10:16:50PM +0100 RW schrieb:
I read UPDATING and did all the steps described there.
No, you didn't because /usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries/Makefile
contains a little test to
Hi,
I run mldonkey (mlnet+gui) on freebsd 6.2 and found it takes up a lot of
CPU resources. Is this a common thing or just me. Also, is there something
else, e.g. amule, xmule that runs a little lighters on the system?? thank
you!!
TFC
___
At 02:06 PM 7/23/2007, John Clement wrote:
So I got a copy of boot-only 6.2 onto cd and went back into the bios and
changed a few options:
LBA mode: off
Multi-sector transfers: auto
Fast PIO: auto
32 bit transfer mode: on
Ultra DMA: auto
then ran the 6.2 install using dangerously dedicated
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:44:17 -0400
Tsu-Fan Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I run mldonkey (mlnet+gui) on freebsd 6.2 and found it takes up a
lot of CPU resources.
What happens if you shut down the gui. The good thing about mldonkey is
that most of the time you don't need it.
Hi there,
might somebody be able to recommend a good XML repository that keeps
files in XML format but still viewable, uploadable, downloadable, and
searchable via a web front-end?
Cheers,
Noah
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Tsu-Fan Cheng writes:
I run mldonkey (mlnet+gui) on freebsd 6.2 and found it takes
up a lot of CPU resources. Is this a common thing or just
me. Also, is there something else, e.g. amule, xmule that
runs a little lighters on the system?? thank you!!
From top a
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:44:17PM -0400, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
Hi,
I run mldonkey (mlnet+gui) on freebsd 6.2 and found it takes up a lot of
CPU resources. Is this a common thing or just me.
I run mlnet 2.8.7 *without* the GUI on 6.2 on a 533MHz VIA C3 (hardly a
powerhorse) and it consumes
i see. After running just the mlnet_real itself, the app doesnt consume so
much power anymore. So the gui is the real problem here, huh?? any attempt
to improve this??
ciao,
TFC
On 7/23/07, Danny Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:44:17PM -0400, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
Hi,
just browser the port directory and discovered that firefox 3.0 is in the
system, before i upgrade to that, would like to know if *everything* works
fine with this version, especially the flash plugin, thank you !!
TFC
___
On 7/23/07, Tsu-Fan Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
just browser the port directory and discovered that firefox 3.0 is in
the
system, before i upgrade to that, would like to know if *everything* works
fine with this version, especially the flash plugin, thank you !!
TFC
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 07:53:14PM -0300, Anton Galitch wrote:
On 7/23/07, Tsu-Fan Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
just browser the port directory and discovered that firefox 3.0 is in
the
system, before i upgrade to that, would like to know if *everything* works
fine with this
On 23/07/07, Tsu-Fan Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
just browser the port directory and discovered that firefox 3.0 is in the
system, before i upgrade to that, would like to know if *everything* works
fine with this version, especially the flash plugin, thank you !!
It compiles and
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
snip
himinbjorg# ldd work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf
work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf:
libXfont.so.1 = /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1 (0x2808)
libc.so.5 = /lib/libc.so.5 (0x280e6000)
WHY when the cc step is stating -L/usr/local/lib is it bring the
I got Firefox 3.0 Alpha 7 / 2.0.0.5 / 1.5.0.12
No problem so far ...
Thanks
Troy
http://dominor.com
*
*On 7/23/07, Tsu-Fan Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
just browser the port directory and discovered that firefox 3.0 is in
the
system, before i upgrade to that, would like to know if
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/
Troy
http://primoris.com
On 7/23/07, Anton Galitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/23/07, Tsu-Fan Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
just browser the port directory and discovered that firefox 3.0 is in
the
system,
sorry, i didnt notice that its the devel version. I just saw it in the
freebsd.org/ports page. anyhow, I initial attempt was to find a alternative
browser to firefox. On windows, there are avant, k-meleon and such, they are
pretty good and fast compared to ff/IE. I wonder if there is any such
I better try avant, k-meleon ,, I am not very happy with FF/IE.. They are
slow.. They use a lot of resources..
Thanks
http://dominor.net
On 7/23/07, Tsu-Fan Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry, i didnt notice that its the devel version. I just saw it in the
freebsd.org/ports page.
hi,
just found out that i have some mount process that cant be killed. I was
trying to mount a digital photo frame but failed, I issued mount_msdos
/dev/da0 /mnt on console. After seeing it not returned, I login from
another console and killed the previous login. Now the mount process is
still
Here's a followup, so anyone checking the archives
will know what to do... (and if it helps the group
overall, even better)
Much thanks to those who tried to help. As I was
running a Pentium on an Intel board, it never
occurred to me to even look at the amd64 variant,
until I realized the one
Tsu-Fan Cheng writes:
i see. After running just the mlnet_real itself, the app doesnt
consume so much power anymore. So the gui is the real problem
here, huh?? any attempt to improve this??
For this, you will probably hace to talk to the developers
On 23/07/07, Steve Franks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not totally opposed to what comes up in X if you start with no
.xinitrc, but it's a tad ugly. I'd ideally like to have a nifty
window manager, like one of those new 3d ones,
3d?! My VR goggles, when I jack into the global
net, only give
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:11:38 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It compiles and runs here (6.2 7 i386), although
almost none of the extensions or plugins want to
run on it.
you can disable the version check for the extensions - they may still not run
(they may even crash ffox!
also good to keep in mind, that if you're going to be rebuilding the world and
updating that minimal install to -STABLE or RELEASE-p[latest], that you'll be
installing the man pages along with the updated world as well.
cheers,
--
Jonathan Horne
http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote:
hi,
just found out that i have some mount process that cant be killed. I
was
trying to mount a digital photo frame but failed, I issued mount_msdos
/dev/da0 /mnt on console. After seeing it not returned, I login from
another console and killed the previous login. Now the
Hello All,
I do have problem when I tried to access the file kernel file GENEREIC
I did as follows but following error cames so could please any body
answer me waht is exactly the problem
ns2# /cdrom/5.5-RELEASE/src/install.sh all
Extracting sources into /usr/src...
Extracting source
60 matches
Mail list logo
