[EMAIL PROTECTED] пишет:
On 20/01/2008, Celso Viana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/1/20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 19/01/2008, Celso Viana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. . .
1 error
*** Error code 2
1 error
*** Error code 2
...What can be wrong?
Did you compile with -j ?
--
--
Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to compile and install xorg and gnome via metaports on a
machine, making packages out of the entire process, including
dependencies. My goal is to have a tarball that i can take to other
machines, extract it and do a pkg_add * and have xorg and gnome
Nerius Landys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to figure out how a port makefile configures, makes, makes
install from a source tarball.
You'd better look at /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk for port specifics
The port I'm interested in in particular is /usr/ports/x11/Terminal; I have
it built
Hi Oliver,
Olivier Nicole wrote:
How do I use the above script for my machine which I access remotely by SSH.
Yuck. I could email you a list of 1000 random strings?
I could send it to you as Perl script, so you could generate 500
passwords in one run, or you call the web page enough number
Hello,
I noticed that pflog is not being written to.
$ l /var/log/pflog
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 60 Jan 22 00:00 /var/log/pflog
However, the process running pflogd runs as _pflogd. Does this mean I
should chown the log file with user _pflogd?
_pflogd248 0.0 0.2 1632 1056 ?? S
On Monday 21 January 2008 22:00:33 perlcat wrote:
Trying to access a vpn using ssh on 6.2 - STABLE. Haven't found an
answer anywhere, and so I must be totally missing the right questions to
ask or configurations to look at.
This problem is consistent regardless of port chosen or access
http://www.spamsuite.com/node/351
jest first step to criminalize unix at all
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
In host implementation, if I manually configure global ipv6 address via
ifconfig command then those addresses are not persistent after making the
interface DOWN and again UP, which is not the case for IPv4 addresses. Is
this an intentional behavior that all ipv6 address needs to be removed
In host implementation, if I manually configure global ipv6 address via
ifconfig command then those addresses are not persistent after making the
interface DOWN and again UP, which is not the case for IPv4 addresses. Is
this an intentional behavior that all ipv6 address needs to be removed from
Schiz0 wrote:
Can someone help me either solve the bootloader problem, or just how
to get into single user mode?
If, instead of the pretty, numbered boot loader menu, you get the old
4.x style 'Hit [Enter] to boot immediately' autoboot prompt, hit any key
other than enter, then type 'boot
I'm having troubles updating my buildworld and i've had troubles
narrowing it down on google.
My question is:
Is there any way i could update the system in the state it is now?
(Preferably without reinstalling the entire system from scratch.)
PS. I've heard about freebsd-update but never got
Hi,
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
http://www.spamsuite.com/node/351
jest first step to criminalize unix at all
first step?
Many Unix tools are considered illegal by German law since last summer.
Erich
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi again,
Following the suggestion of Ulrich. The paths change
and I have more problems with x11, the path without
changing without lang is
sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin
with lang
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Orwell should just change title from 1984 to 2010-15
Maybe it's just me, but this whole thing kinda feels like somebody
walking around the house naked and then suing an innocent passer-by
for seeing them naked.
Oh my, this is so ridiculous...
Alphons
--
VISTA -
On Jan 21, 2008 10:08 PM, Bob Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/21/08, Schiz0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 1:38 PM, Schiz0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Now, I'm even in a bigger hole. My power died this weekend, and I
guess the / partition has some errors on it, so it is
On Jan 21, 2008 10:08 PM, Bob Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/21/08, Schiz0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 1:38 PM, Schiz0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Now, I'm even in a bigger hole. My power died this weekend, and I
guess the / partition has some errors on it, so it is
jest first step to criminalize unix at all
first step?
Many Unix tools are considered illegal by German law since last summer.
could you mail me more about it ?
it's as stupid as considering knives to be illegal. yes i can kill with
knife, but i don't do this, and need it to slice a
Is this behavior exists from the beginning of KAME integration or available
in latest freebsd code? Because I was using a box which derives its ipv6
code from KAME project and the behavior was different from this. Also, in a
host which uses Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update
This should go to -chat.
Living just outside of Fargo, I find this interesting. I guess I better
not telnet to service ports to make sure HTTP/SMTP/IMAP/IPOP servers
are running.
Admininstratively, the Zone transfers should be restricted to secondary
peers. If a person constructed the walls of
Sten Daniel Soersdal wrote:
I'm having troubles updating my buildworld and i've had troubles
narrowing it down on google.
My question is:
Is there any way i could update the system in the state it is now?
(Preferably without reinstalling the entire system from scratch.)
PS. I've heard about
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Orwell should just change title from 1984 to 2010-15
Maybe it's just me, but this whole thing kinda feels like somebody
walking around the house naked and then suing an innocent passer-by
for seeing them naked.
Oh my, this is so ridiculous...
no it is EXACTLY like
Bill Moran wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but this whole thing kinda feels like somebody
walking around the house naked and then suing an innocent passer-by
for seeing them naked.
no it is EXACTLY like that!
Not quite. Seeing somebody naked because they're stupid enough to run
around the house
$ ssh -X -N -L 127.0.0.3:13390:192.168.1.44:3390 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
bind: Can't assign requested address
channel_setup_fwd_listener: cannot listen to port: 13390
Could not request local forwarding.
Ofcourse it fails, you are trying to bind to address
Living just outside of Fargo, I find this interesting. I guess I better
not telnet to service ports to make sure HTTP/SMTP/IMAP/IPOP servers
are running.
it looks like slowly microsoft is doing their work - to change internet
to webbrowsing with everything else forbidden.
Admininstratively,
In response to Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Orwell should just change title from 1984 to 2010-15
Maybe it's just me, but this whole thing kinda feels like somebody
walking around the house naked and then suing an innocent passer-by
for seeing them naked.
On Tuesday 22 January 2008 10:01:49 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Orwell should just change title from 1984 to 2010-15
Maybe it's just me, but this whole thing kinda feels like somebody
walking around the house naked and then suing an innocent passer-by
for seeing them
Hi
check google:
http://www.google.com/search?q=illegale+hackertoolsbtnG=Searchhl=en
The problem will be that the repsective articles will all be in German.
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
jest first step to criminalize unix at all
first step?
Many Unix tools are considered illegal by German law
Hello,
2008/1/22, Rakhesh Sasidharan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I noticed that pflog is not being written to.
$ l /var/log/pflog
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 60 Jan 22 00:00 /var/log/pflog
However, the process running pflogd runs as _pflogd. Does this mean I
should chown the log file with
I noticed that pflog is not being written to.
$ l /var/log/pflog
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 60 Jan 22 00:00 /var/log/pflog
However, the process running pflogd runs as _pflogd. Does this mean I
should chown the log file with user _pflogd?
I don't think so. Had a look at my machine,
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
2008/1/22, Rakhesh Sasidharan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I noticed that pflog is not being written to.
$ l /var/log/pflog
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 60 Jan 22 00:00 /var/log/pflog
However, the process running pflogd runs as _pflogd. Does this mean I
should chown the
In response to Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:03:27 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.spamsuite.com/node/351
jest first step to criminalize unix at all
No really. This case involved an individual who was accessing and
acquiring
Hello,
2008/1/22, Rakhesh Sasidharan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
2008/1/22, Rakhesh Sasidharan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I noticed that pflog is not being written to.
$ l /var/log/pflog
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 60 Jan 22 00:00 /var/log/pflog
However, the
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:03:27 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.spamsuite.com/node/351
jest first step to criminalize unix at all
No really. This case involved an individual who was accessing and
acquiring information using falsified credentials for an apparent
Gerard wrote:
It is not the 'tool' that is being addressed here; but rather, what the
individual did with it.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. Ritz's behavior in conducting a zone transfer was unauthorized within
the meaning of the North Dakota Computer Crime Law.
Alphons
--
VISTA - Viruses
Gerard wrote:
While that may seem slightly harsh, at least for a first offense, it
does point up the fact that people like Ritz are a blight upon the
legitimate computer users community.
Agreed. But upon looking at something like this...
4. Ritz frequently accomplished his access to Sierra's
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:44:37 +
Alphons \Fonz\ van Werven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gerard wrote:
It is not the 'tool' that is being addressed here; but rather, what
the individual did with it.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. Ritz's behavior in conducting a zone transfer was unauthorized
--On Tuesday, January 22, 2008 13:03:27 +0100 Wojciech Puchar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.spamsuite.com/node/351
jest first step to criminalize unix at all
___
We aren't criminals, but *he* is.
--
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior
Dear Sir,
i'm actually a student in an IT school (Epitech) and i would like to
organise a Discovery day.
I would like people to discover the FreeBSD products.
Can i organise something and can i speak with a french people which will
can help me?
Thank you
Julien
/quote
While that may seem slightly harsh, at least for a first offense, it
does point up the fact that people like Ritz are a blight upon the
legitimate computer users community.
what about all these idiots in courts and goverments we all pay huge taxes
for?
Dear Sir,
i'm actually a student in an IT school (Epitech) and i would like to organise
a Discovery day.
I would like people to discover the FreeBSD products.
Can i organise something and can i speak with a french people which will can
help me?
of course. come on and do it.
iH,
apache13 segfaults/coredump on FreeBSD 7-RC with php mhash extension
enabled, works fine on 6.3 [several boxes, fresh install 6 and 7].
[with or without latest cvsup RELENG_7 build/install world/kernel]
apache13
php-5.2.5
mhash-0.9.9
php5-mhash-5.2.5
[ and all the other
Hi guys,
Just trying to make sendmail work locally only.And by that i mean, i
dont want sendmail to be able to relay or send mail to any other machine
except for localhost
How can i do this? I mean is there a way on rc.conf or i need to touch the
cf??
Thanks in advance and cheers,
On Jan 22, 2008 4:25 PM, Agus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
Just trying to make sendmail work locally only.And by that i mean, i
dont want sendmail to be able to relay or send mail to any other machine
except for localhost
How can i do this? I mean is there a way on rc.conf or i
Hello,
Anyone used mfsbsd to do remote install of a dedicated server with
success?
Summary:
A dedicated server has FreeBSD 6.x running with / as the entire
partition of the entire disk. Hoping to find a solution to do reinstall
remotely.
depenguinator seems incompatible with the current
Agus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just trying to make sendmail work locally only.And by that i mean, i
dont want sendmail to be able to relay or send mail to any other machine
except for localhost
How can i do this? I mean is there a way on rc.conf or i need to touch the
cf??
This is
Anyone used mfsbsd to do remote install of a dedicated server with
success?
Summary:
A dedicated server has FreeBSD 6.x running with / as the entire
partition of the entire disk. Hoping to find a solution to do reinstall
remotely.
it is already running freebsd? no need any extra tool to
Hi,
What is currently the best way to attach and detach umass-devices
automatically?
Bye
Oliver
--
Oliver PETER, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ# 113969174
Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away.
The Queen is their slave.
pgp6dOGpuYMWL.pgp
Description: PGP
Quoting Oliver Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
What is currently the best way to attach and detach umass-devices
automatically?
Bye
Oliver
--
Oliver PETER, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ# 113969174
Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away.
The Queen is their
Maybe I missed something critical, but I just decided to give 7.0rc1 a
shot, did a standard x-user install on a fresh system (older 1.3GHz
laptop), went smoothly, but startx reports (EE) Failed to load module
mouse (modules does not exist, 0), (and kbd, and radeon) which
seems a tad strange. If
On Jan 22, 2008 3:56 PM, Steve Franks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I missed something critical, but I just decided to give 7.0rc1 a
shot, did a standard x-user install on a fresh system (older 1.3GHz
laptop), went smoothly, but startx reports (EE) Failed to load module
mouse (modules does
Quoting Steve Franks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe I missed something critical, but I just decided to give 7.0rc1 a
shot, did a standard x-user install on a fresh system (older 1.3GHz
laptop), went smoothly, but startx reports (EE) Failed to load module
mouse (modules does not exist, 0), (and kbd,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 03:00:45PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
jest first step to criminalize unix at all
first step?
Many Unix tools are considered illegal by German law since last summer.
could you mail me more about it ?
it's as stupid as considering knives to be illegal. yes i
On Jan 22, 2008 4:02 PM, David Alanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Steve Franks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe I missed something critical, but I just decided to give 7.0rc1 a
shot, did a standard x-user install on a fresh system (older 1.3GHz
laptop), went smoothly, but startx reports (EE)
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:02:13 -0600
David Alanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Steve Franks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Maybe I missed something critical, but I just decided to give 7.0rc1 a
shot, did a standard x-user install on a fresh system (older 1.3GHz
laptop), went smoothly, but startx
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, David Alanis wrote:
Quoting Oliver Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
What is currently the best way to attach and detach umass-devices
automatically?
Bye
Oliver
--
Oliver PETER, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ# 113969174
Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away.
On Tuesday 22 January 2008 06:13:17 pm Chris Hill wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, David Alanis wrote:
Quoting Oliver Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
What is currently the best way to attach and detach umass-devices
automatically?
Bye
Oliver
--
Oliver PETER, email: [EMAIL
On 2008-01-22 16:28, Schiz0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 22, 2008 4:25 PM, Agus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
Just trying to make sendmail work locally only.And by that i
mean, i dont want sendmail to be able to relay or send mail to any
other machine except for localhost
How
2008/1/22, Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2008-01-22 16:28, Schiz0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 22, 2008 4:25 PM, Agus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
Just trying to make sendmail work locally only.And by that i
mean, i dont want sendmail to be able to relay or send mail
Hi,
We've received a server containing 3Ware 9650SE controller
with 4 ports and
it comes with 4 WD7500AYYS drives with the following drive
parameters of LBA
1465149168 (sectors?). I'm using FBSD 7.0 RC-1 which provides
the necessary
drivers for that controller card. The array is
Newbie question here.
I've followed the installation instructions in the book FreeBSD 6
Unleashed and (finally) gotten it installed. Now I proceed to the
setting up of X, where the book says to log in as root, and type Xorg
-configure . I do that and get a response something like
On Monday 21 January 2008 02:49:22 pm Paul Procacci wrote:
Do you have any partitions mounted with noexec?
I just got a very similar problem and it was due to me having /tmp mounted
with noexec.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 01:49:11PM -0500, Joe Demeny wrote:
After building world and kernel,
I get the infamous Xlib: extension XFree86-DRI missing on display
:0.0 error on my new system (7.0rc1). I've put dri glx in
xorg.conf (7.3), to no avail.
Relevant dmesg:
...
drm0: ATI Radeon RS100 Mobility U1 on vgapci0
info: [drm] AGP at 0xe400 64MB
info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.25.0
I'll try again to submit a question. Please see the attached.
Jerry
Attachment is a copy of the message.
---BeginMessage---
Newbie question here.
I've followed the installation instructions in the book FreeBSD 6
Unleashed and (finally) gotten it installed. Now I
Hi,
I need to know which is the latest stable FreeBSD release(6.2 ?) and
does it goes well with Dell 2950 ?
Thanks
Navneet
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
I noticed that pflog is not being written to.
$ l /var/log/pflog
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 60 Jan 22 00:00 /var/log/pflog
However, the process running pflogd runs as _pflogd. Does this mean I
should chown the log file with user _pflogd?
Also, just noticed now that my /var/log/pflog file
Hi,
can you check with the downloadable handbook what the currently
recommended procedure to setup X is.
Books tend to be outdated.
If I remember right then the current version of X starts just fine
without any configuration file.
We also would need the program versions to help you a bit
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 10:11 +0530, navneet Upadhyay wrote:
Hi,
I need to know which is the latest stable FreeBSD release(6.2 ?) and
does it goes well with Dell 2950 ?
Did you check the list archives?
With 6.2:
- Make sure you get revision 2 of the unit
- bce(4) onboard is not
Jerry Breazeale wrote:
Subject:
Xorg config
From:
Jerry Breazeale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:41:40 +
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC:
Newbie question here.
I've followed
I need to know which is the latest stable FreeBSD release(6.2 ?) and
does it goes well with Dell 2950 ?
6.3 should be the latest stable.
And yes about the 2950, with the bellow remarks (I asked the same
question one month ago, check fro the tread about dell Power Edge
2950).
Olivier
And yes about the 2950, with the bellow remarks (I asked the same
question one month ago, check fro the tread about dell Power Edge
2950).
Time for a FreeBSD-PowerEdge Wiki.
~BAS
Olivier
Make sure that you get a Revision 2 (R2). We had some serious stability
On 22 Jan 2008, at 21:41, Jerry Breazeale wrote:
Newbie question here.
I've followed the installation instructions in the book FreeBSD 6
Unleashed and (finally) gotten it installed. Now I proceed to the
setting up of X, where the book says to log in as root, and type
Xorg
I just setup a server running FreeBSD 6.3. After the install I made some
housekeeping changes, installed some ports ... so far so good, no problems.
Rebooted the server and still no problems. After installing quagga
(/usr/ports/net/quagga) is when I started having problems. The server got
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Schmehl
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:25 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS?
--On Tuesday, January 22, 2008 13:03:27 +0100 Wojciech Puchar
[EMAIL
Hello
I've installed 6.3 on my machine with gnome2 and the lock screen
function does not work with the standard install of GNOME2, is there
some feature to install to make this available ?
Thanks a lot.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I've followed the installation instructions in the book FreeBSD 6
Unleashed and (finally) gotten it installed. Now I proceed to the
setting up of X, where the book says to log in as root, and type Xorg
-configure . I do that and get a response something like Xorg command
not known.
Anyone used mfsbsd to do remote install of a dedicated server with
success?
Summary:
A dedicated server has FreeBSD 6.x running with / as the entire
partition of the entire disk. Hoping to find a solution to do
reinstall
remotely.
it is already running freebsd? no need any
I don't know why you didn't succeed in installing 'xorg-server' during your
installation if that was indeed your intent.
Read the Handbook section on installing X if you want to try installing or
configuring X post-install:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x11.html
77 matches
Mail list logo
