I'm running FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE and I want to keep track on when
it's updated so that I can upgrade. I'm on the freebsd-announce list but
I'm not sure if it's the right list to follow for this purpose.
/Leslie
___
freebsd-questions
I'm running FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE and I want to keep
track on when
it's updated so that I can upgrade. I'm on the
freebsd-announce list but
I'm not sure if it's the right list to follow for
this purpose.
/Leslie
you will be surprised how often the code is getting modified
Leslie Jensen wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE and I want to keep track on when
it's updated so that I can upgrade. I'm on the freebsd-announce list but
I'm not sure if it's the right list to follow for this purpose.
/Leslie
At the moment there hasn't been a RELENG_7_1 tag laid
On Monday 29 September 2008 13:47:45 Leslie Jensen wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE and I want to keep track on when
it's updated so that I can upgrade. I'm on the freebsd-announce list but
I'm not sure if it's the right list to follow for this purpose.
/Leslie
If your intention
Mel skrev:
On Monday 29 September 2008 13:47:45 Leslie Jensen wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE and I want to keep track on when
it's updated so that I can upgrade. I'm on the freebsd-announce list but
I'm not sure if it's the right list to follow for this purpose.
/Leslie
If your
On Monday 29 September 2008 17:06:56 Leslie Jensen wrote:
Mel skrev:
On Monday 29 September 2008 13:47:45 Leslie Jensen wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE and I want to keep track on when
it's updated so that I can upgrade. I'm on the freebsd-announce list but
I'm not sure
Mel skrev:
On Monday 29 September 2008 17:06:56 Leslie Jensen wrote:
Mel skrev:
On Monday 29 September 2008 13:47:45 Leslie Jensen wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE and I want to keep track on when
it's updated so that I can upgrade. I'm on the freebsd-announce list but
I'm
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Original Message
From: chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 11:16:51 PM
Subject: getting off mailing list
Hi,
HP! under my mailing address [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am
Hi,
HP! under my mailing address [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am on a
mailing list. HOW DO I GET OFF IT
Thanks
Chris
Black George
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
HP! under my mailing address [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am on a
mailing list. HOW DO I GET OFF IT
Read the bottom of the email, it says:
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
chris wrote:
Hi,
HP! under my mailing address [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am on
a mailing list. HOW DO I GET OFF IT
Thanks
Chris
Black George
Try visiting http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
___
freebsd-questions
into the management page, I marked to receive my own posts
and nothing.
I get all the posts to all the lists except mine.
Am i being blocked?
Could anyone just simply reply this post?
Thanks,
Mario Lobo
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
marked the option to receive my own posts but I
never get them .. and if I remember correctly, some else has noticed that too
and made a comment about it on this list some time ago ...
As far as your mail goes: they do make their way into the list :)
Regards
--
Blessings
Gonzalo Nemmi
, there are too many people and listserves involved, so it is
not manageable.
Bob McConnell
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gonzalo Nemmi
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 12:36 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is the list getting
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:20:22 -0300 (ART)
Mario Lobo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mario Lobo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Is the list getting my e-mails?
Hi;
Forgive for this test.
Recently I changed my domain to another ISP.
Since then, I have been unable to post
On Friday 22 August 2008 14:17:00 Gerard wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:20:22 -0300 (ART)
Mario Lobo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mario Lobo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Is the list getting my e-mails?
Hi;
Forgive for this test.
Recently I changed my domain to another ISP
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aloha Mario,
Read your post here in Hawaii...
Does the isp give you a fixed address? Or maybe
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 22:52 -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On August 18, 2008 10:13:54 PM -0500 Jeffrey Goldberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 18, 2008, at 9:03 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I know I'm missing the obvious. I want to use an IP list to
generate an ip+hostname list. IOW, I
@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know I'm missing the obvious. I want to use an IP list to generate an
ip+hostname list. IOW, I want to go from this:
x.x.x.x
y.y.y.y
to this;
x.x.x.x foo.domain.tld
y.y..y.y bar.domain.tld
What's the best/easiest way to do this?
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior Information
--On August 19, 2008 12:44:05 PM +1000 Fraser Tweedale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 09:03:36PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I know I'm missing the obvious. I want to use an IP list to generate
an ip+hostname list. IOW, I want to go from this:
x.x.x.x
y.y.y.y
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 09:03:36PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I know I'm missing the obvious. I want to use an IP list to generate an
ip+hostname list. IOW, I want to go from this:
x.x.x.x
y.y.y.y
to this;
x.x.x.x foo.domain.tld
y.y..y.y bar.domain.tld
What's the best/easiest
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:05:18PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On August 19, 2008 12:44:05 PM +1000 Fraser Tweedale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 09:03:36PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I know I'm missing the obvious. I want to use an IP list to generate
an ip
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:18:07PM -0500, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Aug 18, 2008, at 10:13 PM, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
==
#!/bin/sh
while read LINE
do
echo $LINE `dig +short -x $LINE`
done
===
You'll want to
.
-j
--
Jeffrey Goldberghttp://www.goldmark.org/jeff/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 18, 2008, at 9:03 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I know I'm missing the obvious. I want to use an IP list to
generate an ip+hostname list. IOW, I want to go from this:
x.x.x.x
y.y.y.y
to this;
x.x.x.x foo.domain.tld
y.y..y.y bar.domain.tld
What's the best/easiest way to do
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:03:36 -0500
Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know I'm missing the obvious. I want to use an IP list to generate
an ip+hostname list. IOW, I want to go from this:
x.x.x.x
y.y.y.y
to this;
x.x.x.x foo.domain.tld
y.y..y.y bar.domain.tld
What's the best
--On August 18, 2008 10:13:54 PM -0500 Jeffrey Goldberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 18, 2008, at 9:03 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I know I'm missing the obvious. I want to use an IP list to
generate an ip+hostname list. IOW, I want to go from this:
x.x.x.x
y.y.y.y
to this;
x.x.x.x
Hi Everybody:
Simple question, if I want to know if a cpu X is on a particular
package is there an easy way to list this? Normally my understanding
is on most machines, every other LAPIC id is on the same package. So
0,2,4,6 would be on one package and 1,3,5,7 would be on another (say
in a 2
headers of individual messages, but this shows
that your message hit the digest without attachment, and others report
no attachment seen in list mail either, as this reply by Paul shows:
Here is a message which has been signed.
There's no sig attached, so it's getting stripped off somewhere
: Problems opening mail on this list
--On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 15:32:45 -0600 Chad Perrin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 03:34:59PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 16:23:32 -0400 Andrew Berry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10-Jun-08, at 1:07 PM, Paul
Ian Smith wrote:
However, what normally happens to attachments to questions@, at least to
digests, is that they get stripped with a note pointing to the original
attachment, as this subsequent message from Chad illustrates:
Which makes sense - attachments don't clog up the list, and people
Here is a message signed with Thunderbird 2 on Windows (ugh...).
--Andrew
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
and not
those of my employer.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S/MIME#Caveats,
either is an acceptable mime type. So I guess I should email the list
admins and ask them to allow that mime type, since they are allowing
signatures anyways on the list.
--Andrew
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
message, I do not have control over which
mail agent I use. That is dictated by the company's IT group. It may
soon be further downgraded to Office 2007, if the rumors I hear are
correct.
Bob McConnell
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
I have gotten several messages on this list from an Andrew Barry which
Lookout cannot open. The error message is Can't open this item. Your
Digital ID name can not be found by the underlying security system. Can
anyone tell me what is causing this?
Thank you,
Bob McConnell
On 10-Jun-08, at 11:37 AM, Bob McConnell wrote:
I have gotten several messages on this list from an Andrew Barry which
Lookout cannot open. The error message is Can't open this item. Your
Digital ID name can not be found by the underlying security system.
Can
anyone tell me what is causing
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:37:48 -0400
Bob McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have gotten several messages on this list from an Andrew Barry which
Lookout cannot open.
I don't see any posts with that name in this list. Could they be spam?
___
freebsd
--On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:37:48 -0400 Bob McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have gotten several messages on this list from an Andrew Barry which
Lookout cannot open. The error message is Can't open this item. Your
Digital ID name can not be found by the underlying security system. Can
of
your messages, so their SPAM filter appears to be blocking you.
Bob McConnell
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 11:50 AM
To: Bob McConnell
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Problems opening mail on this list
On 10-Jun
be getting
mangled by the listserve. Another reply said they have never seen any of
your messages, so their SPAM filter appears to be blocking you.
The message that Andrew sent in response to you did not have a digital
signature on it. I don't know if that means it was stripped by the list
On 10-Jun-08, at 1:07 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
The message that Andrew sent in response to you did not have a
digital signature on it. I don't know if that means it was stripped
by the list software or he didn't sign the message.
I disabled signing when sending that message, just so my
On 10-Jun-08, at 11:49 AM, RW wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:37:48 -0400
Bob McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have gotten several messages on this list from an Andrew Barry
which
Lookout cannot open.
I don't see any posts with that name in this list. Could they be spam?
Typo on my
On 10-Jun-08, at 1:07 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Andrew, maybe you could send a signed message, state in the body
that it was signed, and then I can look at the headers and tell you
what's going on.
Here is a message which has been signed.
--Andrew
opinions are my own and not
those of my employer.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 03:34:59PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 16:23:32 -0400 Andrew Berry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10-Jun-08, at 1:07 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Andrew, maybe you could send a signed message, state in the body
that it was signed, and then I can
.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--On Tuesday, June 10, 2008 15:32:45 -0600 Chad Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My PGP signatures seem to come through just fine, however.
Here's a test of my sig.
--
Paul Schmehl
As if it wasn't already obvious,
my opinions are my own and not
those of my employer.
Hi FreeBSD users
I am searching for something similar to Red Hat's rpm -q -l package
and Debian's dpkg -L package.
cheers
Simon
--
XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:35:01 +0200
From: Simon Jolle
Subject: list files in FreeBSD ports tree package
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi FreeBSD users
I am searching for something similar to Red Hat's rpm -q -l
@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
even if the zfs module is loaded I get the error message:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ kldstat | grep zfs
71 0xfcc1c000 80ee8zfs.ko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ zfs list
internal error: failed to initialize ZFS library
Anyway thx for the info.. At least now I know why it should not work
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 01:41:28PM -0500, Mark Kane wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008, at 15:13:16 +0200, Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi all,
is it normal that I can't do a 'zfs list' ( for example ) as non-root
user ?
$ zfs list
internal error: failed to initialize ZFS library
I think
What is the best way to have a list that only certain users are able to
send to?
That sounds like you're getting into a full blown mailing0list package. I
set up the minimalist port for a small list last year. Small very easy
to config. I think it has the restriction you
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 15:07:31 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Lock down the all-staff email list? sendmail, alias, majordomo?
brad davison wrote:
What is the best way to have a list that only certain users are able to
send
have disabled the alias, since I didn't know if there was a way to restrict
who can send to aliases, but is there a good way to have a list of users that
either a) doesn't give the list name in the email, or B) a list program like
majordomo or something that I can keep people from using who
didn't like, so now I have to restrict
who can send to it.
or B) a list program like majordomo or something that I can keep
people from using who isn't 'the boss'?
That is the option I recommend. Look at the mailman port. Mailman is
a very nice (though not perfect) mailing list management
that someone
didn't like, so now I have to restrict who can send to it.
I have disabled the alias, since I didn't know if there was a way to restrict
who can send to aliases, but is there a good way to have a list of users that
either a) doesn't give the list name in the email, or B) a list
before the message is queued. If there is a
match you can accept, reject, redirect, or many other things.
OTOH if only a few people are allowed to send to all-staff then maybe it
would be best to manually maintain a mail list in their personal address
books?
Another way to deal with it would
brad davison wrote:
What is the best way to have a list that only certain users are able to send to?
That sounds like you're getting into a full blown mailing0list package. I set up the
minimalist port for a small list last year. Small very easy to config. I
think it has the restriction
At 2008-05-19T15:23:30Z, brad davison wrote:
What is the best way to have a list that only certain users are able
to send to?
You can use Majordomo, and set the parameter `restrict_post' in
`listname.config':
restrict_post = listname.allowed
where `listname.allowed' is a file containing
Hi all,
is it normal that I can't do a 'zfs list' ( for example ) as non-root
user ?
$ zfs list
internal error: failed to initialize ZFS library
I think there is really a use case for use some zfs commands as non-root
user..
Thx
Norman
___
freebsd
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008, at 15:13:16 +0200, Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi all,
is it normal that I can't do a 'zfs list' ( for example ) as non-root
user ?
$ zfs list
internal error: failed to initialize ZFS library
I think there is really a use case for use some zfs commands as
non-root user
the FreeBSD mailing lists through the gmane newserver:
news.gmane.org. I find it very useful for lists I only rarely read -
particularly for lists related to ports. Most list will accept posts
through the server.
You still need a valid email address to post though - the first post
made through the news
can access the FreeBSD mailing lists through the gmane newserver:
news.gmane.org. I find it very useful for lists I only rarely read -
particularly for lists related to ports. Most list will accept posts
through the server.
You still need a valid email address to post though - the first post
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 11:54:00PM +0100, Tore Lund wrote:
[snip]
I request that this misunderstood piece of etiquette is revised. If
someone has the brains to find this list as well as the brains to use
FreeBSD at all, they also have the brains to come back here to look
of view. There are several others though.
a) What was your point in saying that?
b) Not really. It's a list of reasons and the reasons are factual,
not opinion. While the overall conclusion is opinion, the article
is factual and informative in nature.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 11:54:00PM +0100, Tore Lund wrote:
Jonathan McKeown wrote:
[snip]
As regards copying the original recipients, this list specifically requests
it: check the regular posting titled ``how to get best results from
freebsd-questions'', particularly para VII.6.
I
?
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
That is one man's point of view. There are several others though.
a) What was your point in saying that?
Because I believe it, why else?
b) Not really. It's a list of reasons and the reasons are factual,
not opinion. While
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 10:19:11 +0100, Tore Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 11:54:00PM +0100, Tore Lund wrote:
[snip]
I request that this misunderstood piece of etiquette is revised. If
someone has the brains to find this list as well as the brains
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
[snip]
We don't accept email only from lurkers. The mailing list is also
advertized as the official place to ask questions in CD-ROMs provided by
vendors, in our documentation, on magazines, conferences, and so on.
The normal thing on all other forums that I have
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:53:54 +0100, Tore Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
[snip]
We don't accept email only from lurkers. The mailing list is also
advertized as the official place to ask questions in CD-ROMs provided by
vendors, in our documentation, on magazines
list of issues that are more vital than
this detail that we are discussing in this thread.
Given that the project is run almost entirely by volunteers,
I suppose some disconnects are inevitable. One example: it's
considered very important for questions@ to be newbie-friendly,
to the point
Da Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fair enough, but is it necessary on all the lists for freebsd?
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:35:57AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
This may have been suggested or discussed before, but is there a reason
why the reply-to on this list isn't the list itself instead of the
person who posted? Ie reply-to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Yes. It is the usual way of doing
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 08:30:28 -0400
Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Da Rock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fair enough, but is it necessary on all the lists for freebsd?
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
That is one man's point of view. There are several others though.
--
Jonathan McKeown wrote:
[snip]
As regards copying the original recipients, this list specifically requests
it: check the regular posting titled ``how to get best results from
freebsd-questions'', particularly para VII.6.
I think you mean para VI.6. The gist of that paragraph is a wish
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 11:54:00PM +0100, Tore Lund wrote:
Jonathan McKeown wrote:
[snip]
As regards copying the original recipients, this list specifically requests
it: check the regular posting titled ``how to get best results from
freebsd-questions'', particularly para VII.6.
I
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Tore Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I request that this misunderstood piece of etiquette is revised. If
someone has the brains to find this list as well as the brains to use
FreeBSD at all, they also have the brains to come back here to look
Dmitry RCL Rekman writes:
I actually did the mistake of subscribing to mailing list,
because I did not know that I would be able to post (and receive
answers) without being subscribed. That resulted in a few tens of
messages not related to the subject I posted about on the very
first
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 20:07:57 -0400
Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dmitry RCL Rekman writes:
I actually did the mistake of subscribing to mailing list,
because I did not know that I would be able to post (and receive
answers) without being subscribed. That resulted in a few tens
This may have been suggested or discussed before, but is there a reason
why the reply-to on this list isn't the list itself instead of the
person who posted? Ie reply-to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Curious...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:35:57AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
This may have been suggested or discussed before, but is there a reason
why the reply-to on this list isn't the list itself instead of the
person who posted? Ie reply-to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Because many people who ask
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 02:58 +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:35:57AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
This may have been suggested or discussed before, but is there a reason
why the reply-to on this list isn't the list itself instead of the
person who posted? Ie reply
Da Rock writes:
Because many people who ask questions here are not subscribed to the
list and thus would not see any answers that were sent only to the list.
Well that certainly explains it, but it does surprise me. I thought
you'd have to subscribe to post.
I believe
--On March 22, 2008 1:10:40 PM +1000 Da Rock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 02:58 +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:35:57AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
This may have been suggested or discussed before, but is there a
reason why the reply-to on this list isn't
before, but is there a
reason why the reply-to on this list isn't the list itself instead of
the person who posted? Ie reply-to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Because many people who ask questions here are not subscribed to the
list and thus would not see any answers that were sent only
---BeginMessage---
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 23:24 -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Da Rock writes:
Because many people who ask questions here are not subscribed to the
list and thus would not see any answers that were sent only to the list.
Well that certainly explains it, but it does
:
This may have been suggested or discussed before, but is there a
reason why the reply-to on this list isn't the list itself instead
of the person who posted? Ie reply-to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Because many people who ask questions here are not subscribed to the
list
Perhaps I missed it somewhere in the man page, but is there a way to
list files with their permission bits displayed as numeric (octal, as
in chmod(1)), instead of symbolic? Something like:
ls -lF -imaginaryFlag
0755 4 Modulok Modulok 512 Dec 17 18:39 dir1/
0644 1 Modulok Modulok
Perhaps I missed it somewhere in the man page, but is there a way to
list files with their permission bits displayed as numeric (octal, as
in chmod(1)), instead of symbolic? Something like:
ls -lF -imaginaryFlag
0755 4 Modulok Modulok 512 Dec 17 18:39 dir1/
0644 1 Modulok Modulok 101786
Modulok wrote:
Perhaps I missed it somewhere in the man page, but is there a way to
list files with their permission bits displayed as numeric (octal, as
in chmod(1)), instead of symbolic? Something like:
ls -lF -imaginaryFlag
0755 4 Modulok Modulok 512 Dec 17 18:39 dir1/
0644 1 Modulok
On 15/03/2008, Modulok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps I missed it somewhere in the man page, but is there a way to
list files with their permission bits displayed as numeric (octal, as
in chmod(1)), instead of symbolic? Something like:
ls -lF -imaginaryFlag
0755 4 Modulok Modulok
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Hello,
which list is best for me to post a Lock Order Reversal which is related the
ral driver?
What about DevFS?
the box was running CURRENT until it was branched for RELENG_7 which was
running code from September 2007 fine until I updated to todays code
401 - 500 of 1395 matches
Mail list logo
