Hi Damien,
What I don't understand is that if I already are on 15.4 and there is an
update to 15.4.1 I have to perform always a 'portupgrade -fr perl' to
have this work?
Normally this only goes for 15.3 to 15.4 (full version upgrade) or do I
miss something here?
Thanks for your help
Jos
So true. I have processed as you suggested and will follow that + the
UPDATING suggestion as well in future.
Just got on wrong track that this scenario should be used with 5.14 to
5.14.x as well.
FYI:
After running
sa-update -D
sa-update --nogpg
spamassassin --lint -D
freshclam
I got at the
So true. I have processed as you suggested and will follow that + the
UPDATING suggestion as well in future.
Just got on wrong track that this scenario should be used with 5.14 to
5.14.x as well.
FYI:
After running
sa-update -D
sa-update --nogpg
spamassassin --lint -D
freshclam
I got at the
On 6/23/11 3:51 PM, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
I have updated my Perl version yesterday but now my Spamd doesn't work
anymore.
Can someone hint me how to solve this?
thanks,
Jos Chrispijn
Pls see output:
Can't locate Net/DNS.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0
On 23/06/2011 14:55, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
I have updated my Perl version yesterday but now my Spamd doesn't work
anymore.
Can someone hint me how to solve this?
You need to reinstall all perl modules if you upgrade perl from 5.10.x
or 5.12.x to 5.14.1. This is explained in UPDATING.
If you
On 23 Jun 2011, at 21:37, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
wrote:
On 23/06/2011 14:55, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
I have updated my Perl version yesterday but now my Spamd doesn't work
anymore.
Can someone hint me how to solve this?
You need to reinstall all perl modules if you
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:42:51 + (UTC)
AN a...@neu.net wrote:
I just setup a new mailserver on 8-stable using sendmail with
Spamassassin and ClamAv. Spam is being identified correctly, but it
is being delivered to users inbox. Would someone please suggest some
good documentation to
2010/11/17 AN a...@neu.net:
I just setup a new mailserver on 8-stable using sendmail with Spamassassin
and ClamAv. Spam is being identified correctly, but it is being delivered
to users inbox. Would someone please suggest some good documentation to
configure mail marked as spam to a
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
Hi,
Since the update of SpamAssassin to 3.3.0, spamd doesn't start anymore and
exits with an error:
child process [x] exited or timed out without signaling production of a
PID file: exit 25 at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 2544.
It seems that
Matthew Seaman wrote:
I'll add your patches and post an updated shar later on.
Done.
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
Alternatively, if someone were sufficiently motived they could put
together an SA utilities port that installs a number of maintenance
scripts which a user can enable.
This sounds like a very good idea to me. As far as I can see, there's only
one script required,
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 06:19:55 -0500
Jerry ges...@yahoo.com wrote:
There is an apparent bug in 'spamassassin' regarding 2010 e-mails. The
full story is available here:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/.
There is also a discussion of it on SlashDot:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
Alternatively, if someone were sufficiently motived they could put
together an SA utilities port that installs a number of maintenance
scripts which a user can enable.
This sounds like a very good idea to me. As far as I can see, there's only
On Jan 3, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
There's a .shar of the new port at:
http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/sa-utils.shar
Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs, I'll
send-pr(1) in a week or so.
Thanks for doing that. It looks great to me. I just
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:10:19 +
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs,
I'll send-pr(1) in a week or so.
You have:
: ${daily_sa_compile=YES}
sa-compile is installed by the SA port, but it requires
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:10:19 +
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs,
I'll send-pr(1) in a week or so.
You have:
: ${daily_sa_compile=YES}
sa-compile is installed by the SA port, but it requires
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
On Jan 3, 2010, at 2:10 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
There's a .shar of the new port at:
http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/sa-utils.shar
Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs, I'll
send-pr(1) in a week or so.
Thanks for doing that. It looks
Matt Emmerton wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:10:19 +
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
Comments, critique are welcome. Unless there are any killer bugs,
I'll send-pr(1) in a week or so.
You have:
: ${daily_sa_compile=YES}
sa-compile is installed by the SA port, but
Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
How do I know if I am running sa-update? When installing SpamAssassin
from ports I was prompted as to whether I wanted to do this (I said
yes), but I don't see anything about it in any crontab I can find
nor in /etc/periodic or /usr/local/etc/periodic.
You need some
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:15:25 +
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
However, neither of these have been accepted by the
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin port maintainer.
It's not really a one-size fits all problem - it depends on which
channels you use and whether you want sa-compile
On Jan 2, 2010, at 8:45 AM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:15:25 +
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
However, neither of these have been accepted by the
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin port maintainer.
It's not really a one-size fits all problem - it depends on which
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:05:54 -0600
Jeffrey Goldberg jeff...@goldmark.org wrote:
There is discussion on the SA mailing list, and it is likely that
some fix will be in with the next batch of rule updates for those who
use sa-update.
It's already available in sa-update.
On Jan 1, 2010, at 5:19 PM, RW wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:05:54 -0600
Jeffrey Goldberg jeff...@goldmark.org wrote:
it is likely that
some fix will be in with the next batch of rule updates for those who
use sa-update.
It's already available in sa-update.
Great.
How do I know if I
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 18:05:59 -0600
Jeffrey Goldberg jeff...@goldmark.org wrote:
How do I know if I am running sa-update? When installing
SpamAssassin from ports I was prompted as to whether I wanted to do
this (I said yes), but I don't see anything about it in any crontab
I can find nor in
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 06:40:37AM +, Marwan Sultan typed:
lastly, what format is used in the whitelist? is it similar
to what i have in /etc/mail/access?
Well, I never change the whitelist, my openwebmail generates the data
Automaticaly.
You will not need to touch the file, as
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:30:47 +
Marwan Sultan dead_l...@hotmail.com wrote:
Gary,
Its an old problem with /root/.spamassassin
I dunt know why spamassassin still have it by default :(
I spent a day or so to figure it out.. however,
If you run spamd as root it will
Gary,
Its an old problem with /root/.spamassassin
I dunt know why spamassassin still have it by default :(
I spent a day or so to figure it out.. however,
in your local.cf
add the lines
auto_whitelist_path /var/spool/spamd/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist
bayes_path
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 02:30:47AM +, Marwan Sultan wrote:
Gary,
Its an old problem with /root/.spamassassin
I dunt know why spamassassin still have it by default :(
I spent a day or so to figure it out.. however,
i think everyone uwho uses spamassassim would be
Hi Gary,
just to be complete++, :-), you mean
/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
, is this correct??
Yes, You are 100% Correct :)
would you check my tying to see if i've made any mistakes?
Again, Correct :)
another question: are these the same perms, 0755, as before
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:21:53 -0800,
Andrew Moran snee...@mac.com said:
A Thank you for your suggestion. I'll try compiling Perl and it's
A dependencies without using PERL_MALLOC.
I've had similar memory problems using Hyperestraier to index
collections exceeding 1,000,000 documents.
On Mar 3, 2009, at 12:31 PM, Mel wrote:
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 07:26:02 Andrew Moran wrote:
Ok sadly that didn't seem to do much:
celebrian# cat /boot/loader.conf
kern.maxdsiz=8G
kern.defdsiz=4G
celebrian#
Can you show limits -H -d?
[r...@celebrian ~]# limits -H -d
Resource limits
On Monday 02 March 2009 16:21:53 Andrew Moran wrote:
What's even weirder is that the process gets that far. Did you play
with
kern.maxdsiz loader tuneable?
If so, set it lower, so you can at least have the machine in a
usable state at
all times. 4G should be enough for any process and
In Mar 3, 2009, at 7:40 AM, Mel wrote:
On Monday 02 March 2009 16:21:53 Andrew Moran wrote:
What's even weirder is that the process gets that far. Did you play
with
kern.maxdsiz loader tuneable?
If so, set it lower, so you can at least have the machine in a
usable state at
all times. 4G
On Mar 3, 2009, at 8:01 AM, Andrew Moran wrote:
In Mar 3, 2009, at 7:40 AM, Mel wrote:
On Monday 02 March 2009 16:21:53 Andrew Moran wrote:
What's even weirder is that the process gets that far. Did you play
with
kern.maxdsiz loader tuneable?
If so, set it lower, so you can at least have
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 07:26:02 Andrew Moran wrote:
On Mar 3, 2009, at 8:01 AM, Andrew Moran wrote:
In Mar 3, 2009, at 7:40 AM, Mel wrote:
On Monday 02 March 2009 16:21:53 Andrew Moran wrote:
What's even weirder is that the process gets that far. Did you play
with
kern.maxdsiz loader
Andrew Moran wrote:
[...]
Has anyone heard of this? Or any pointers on what I can do to figure
out what is causing it?
Your advice is much appreciated.
As an alternative:
You could try mail/mimedefang. It calls spamassassin to evaluate an
e-mail but without having it running all the
On Sunday 01 March 2009 19:23:33 Andrew Moran wrote:
Hey guys,
After having lots of problems with memory and 7.1/ZFS, I first
switched everything to 64-bit (amd64), and then I had a new problem,
so I eventually gave up and switched back to UFS (saying on amd64
distro/ports), but I'm still
On Mar 2, 2009, at 3:39 PM, Mel wrote:
This is hard to debug, but I'd first toggle the PERL_MALLOC option
in the
configuration dialog for the perl port. If this doesn't solve the
problem,
then you'd have to get a ktrace to get some indication of what is
allocating
the memory.
Thank
thnx Philip, your config will help in my current setup.
--- On Wed, 7/23/08, Philip M. Gollucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Philip M. Gollucci [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spamassassin very slow
To: James Tanis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date
Hi James,
I remove spamc on .procmailrc and I can see lots of improvements!
Thanx,
alyd
--- On Wed, 7/23/08, James Tanis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: James Tanis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Spamassassin very slow
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 11:07 AM
lyd mc
That says you are driving spamd into swapping. The two canonical
reasons for SpamAssassin to be really slow are dead BL sites or
overrunning memory and going into heavy swapping. You made a
change to reduce the amount of swapping. Hence you probably have
too many children at any one time.
Modify
Thanks edwin. I better watch those dns rbl feature..
Regards,
alyd
--- On Wed, 7/23/08, Edwin Groothuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Edwin Groothuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Spamassassin very slow
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Cc: lyd mc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, July 23, 2008,
: Re: Spamassassin very slow
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 11:08 AM
lyd mc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What causes spamassassin to slow?
Here is my config:
snippet from sendmail.mc
.. cut ..
I have .procmailrc in every home directory of my
lyd mc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What causes spamassassin to slow?
Here is my config:
snippet from sendmail.mc
.. cut ..
I have .procmailrc in every home directory of my mail users and it goes
like
this:
So if I'm understanding you correctly.. your calling spamc from a sendmail
milter
James Tanis wrote:
lyd mc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What causes spamassassin to slow?
Here is my config:
snippet from sendmail.mc
.. cut ..
I have .procmailrc in every home directory of my mail users and it goes
like
this:
The following setup by the front line mx's (2 of them) for
At 12:12 PM 4/11/2008, Eric Melville wrote:
I've got a very plain and standard sendmail configuration running on a
machine as a primary mail exchanger. After years of running without any
kind of automated spam filtering, it's just gotten too poor and I have
to turn to rejecting mail.
I
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 09:45:10PM +0100, Martin Schweizer typed:
Hello
I get allways the following message in /var/log/maillog:
Jan 31 17:21:36 acsvfbsd02 spamd[53289]: spamd: connection from
localhost.sample.ch [127.0.0.1] at port 64026
Jan 31 17:21:36 acsvfbsd02 spamd[53289]: spamd:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Pluta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see, I disabled bayes and awl in spamassassin, and updated amavisd-new
from ports. I have a different problem. Mail I am sending out is being
thrown away because it's being flagged as spam. I'm stumped, it never
I see, I disabled bayes and awl in spamassassin, and updated
amavisd-new
from ports. I have a different problem. Mail I am sending out is
being
thrown away because it's being flagged as spam. I'm stumped, it
never did
this before.
From memory, you can tell amavis which are your networks, so
The directive above tells postfix to add information into
headers that tell Amavis the mail was sent by someone who was
authenticated by the system and thus trusted.
I expect that the above mentionned headers cannot be forged. Else that
would be a nice way for spam to avoid filtering.
The directive above tells postfix to add information into
headers that tell Amavis the mail was sent by someone who was
authenticated by the system and thus trusted.
I expect that the above mentionned headers cannot be forged. Else
that
would be a nice way for spam to avoid filtering.
IMHO mail gateway isn't the point of checking whether machines inside
are virus free or not. There should be other practises used on
workstations ensuring that the inside environment is virus free at any
given moment.
There should be. But there are also users that decide to use their own
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Reko Turja wrote:
IMHO mail gateway isn't the point of checking whether machines inside are
virus free or not. There should be other practises used on workstations
ensuring that the inside environment is virus free at any given moment.
It's impossible to guarantee that
Peter Pluta wrote:
How can I enable spamassasssin RBL's. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1, postfix,
amavisd-new, and spamassassin with razor. I'm getting many spams that
shouldn't be getting thru with RBL's. I havent been able to find anything
useful on Google that can explain how to get RBL working with
Mikhail Goriachev-2 wrote:
Peter Pluta wrote:
How can I enable spamassasssin RBL's. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1, postfix,
amavisd-new, and spamassassin with razor. I'm getting many spams that
shouldn't be getting thru with RBL's. I havent been able to find anything
useful on Google that can
Peter Pluta wrote:
Mikhail Goriachev-2 wrote:
Peter Pluta wrote:
How can I enable spamassasssin RBL's. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1, postfix,
amavisd-new, and spamassassin with razor. I'm getting many spams that
shouldn't be getting thru with RBL's. I havent been able to find anything
useful on
Christopher Hilton wrote:
Peter Pluta wrote:
Mikhail Goriachev-2 wrote:
Peter Pluta wrote:
How can I enable spamassasssin RBL's. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1, postfix,
amavisd-new, and spamassassin with razor. I'm getting many spams that
shouldn't be getting thru with RBL's. I havent been
How can I enable spamassasssin RBL's. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1, postfix,
amavisd-new, and spamassassin with razor. I'm getting many spams that
shouldn't be getting thru with RBL's. I havent been able to find anything
useful on Google that can explain how to get RBL working with spamassassin.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2007-05-22 06:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have installed Spamaassassin along with amavisd-new to filter spam, but
I don't think it is working. I am getting a bunch of spam and spamassassin
is not tagging it as spam. I have the score set at
What MTA are you using?
Postfix
What method are you using to forward messages
between the MTA and amavisd-new?
This is part of the main.cf
smtp-amavis unix - - y - 2 smtp
-o smtp_data_done_timeout=1200
-o smtp_send_xforward_command=yes
-o
I have installed Spamaassassin along with amavisd-new to filter spam, but
I don't think it is working. I am getting a bunch of spam and spamassassin
is not tagging it as spam. I have the score set at 3.0. It worked before
on my old box but when I installed it on a new box using the same
Start spamd with -D (debug) on both servers to see where and how
spamassassin is configuring itself. Chances are there is some subtle
configuration variation that is causing this behavior. It's easy for this
to happen given the fact that spamassassin reads through a number of
directories for
Derrick wrote:
I'm confused as to why on box #1 I have in /etc/rc.conf:
spamd_enable=YES
spamd_flags=-c -u spamd -H /var/spool/spamd -m 10
And spamd is writing to /var/spool/spamd/.spamassassin
on box #2 and #3, I have the exact same settings yet I see:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Derrick wrote:
I'm confused as to why on box #1 I have in /etc/rc.conf:
spamd_enable=YES
spamd_flags=-c -u spamd -H /var/spool/spamd -m 10
And spamd is writing to /var/spool/spamd/.spamassassin
on box #2 and #3, I have the exact same
On 12/22/06, Beech Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just set up spamassassin on one of my servers. Everything appears to be
working properly, except I'm seeing this error in the maillog:
Dec 22 08:49:57 pinnacle spamd[25077]: spamd: could not create INET socket on
127.0.0.1:783: Permission
I'd suggest asking the Spamassassin mailing lists...
justins wrote:
I`ve installed spamassassin rules on my sentmailserver and i am trying
to filter my mail in order to pick out some spam.
The spamd process is running only it doesn`t add anything to my mail
heather so procmail can`t forward
On 9/18/06, justins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I`ve installed spamassassin rules on my sentmailserver and i am trying to
filter my mail in order to pick out some spam.
The spamd process is running only it doesn`t add anything to my mail
heather so procmail can`t forward it to the caughtspam
justins wrote:
I`ve installed spamassassin rules on my sentmailserver and i am trying
to filter my mail in order to pick out some spam.
The spamd process is running only it doesn`t add anything to my mail
heather so procmail can`t forward it to the caughtspam folder.
How do i start
From: justins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I`ve installed spamassassin rules on my sentmailserver and i am trying to
filter my mail in order to pick out some spam.
The spamd process is running only it doesn`t add anything to my mail
heather so procmail can`t forward it to the caughtspam folder.
How do
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As I think I only went from perl 5.6 to 5.8, I'm surprised that so much would
be out of date. Good to know though. Do the other scripting languages have
this kind of support? Python?
Even among scripting languages, perl is unique in its
On 27/03/06 Lowell Gilbert said:
Even among scripting languages, perl is unique in its pathological
lack of backward compatibility. The FreeBSD maintainers do a nice job
of limiting the pain, but you *do* have to follow their directions.
Python's worse. :(
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 10:18:41PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to build spamassassin from ports.
So, I go to /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin and make.
=== Checking if devel/p5-Test-Harness already installed
=== p5-Test-Harness-2.56 is already
On 26/03/06 Matthew Seaman said:
Did you run the perl-after-upgrade script with the '-f' flag so it
actually does anything? This symptom occurs when the pkg system
thinks a package is installed (because there's an entry in
/var/db/pkgs) but perl can't find the corresponding module, because
On 26/03/06 Matthew Seaman said:
Did you run the perl-after-upgrade script with the '-f' flag so it
actually does anything? This symptom occurs when the pkg system
thinks a package is installed (because there's an entry in
/var/db/pkgs) but perl can't find the corresponding module, because
Hello Michael,
* Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [26-03-06 08:19]:
Nope, I didn't do that. How would I know to do that? :)
reading /usr/ports/UPDATING :)
Best regards,
Matthias
pgpOvxufzBn0e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 08:30:04AM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
As I think I only went from perl 5.6 to 5.8, I'm surprised that so
much would be out of date.
That's actually quite a change, as Perl 5.6.2 dates from, I think,
November 2003, while Perl 5.8.8 was released February 2006.
--
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I just installed the latest SpamAssassin port and noticed it had
country-specific spam filtering as well as spf and ssl support. Does anyone
have a howto on getting all this going with an mta in a production
environment? I'm not looking for anything
Having said that, I don't think that's what you want to do. It sounds like
you
upgraded Spamassassin without upgrading Razor2. I don't think Razor2 gets
upgraded automatically when you upgrade Spamassassin because it's optional. I
would try upgrading the Razor2 port to the latest version.
David Banning wrote:
Having said that, I don't think that's what you want to do. It sounds like you
upgraded Spamassassin without upgrading Razor2. I don't think Razor2 gets
upgraded automatically when you upgrade Spamassassin because it's optional. I
would try upgrading the Razor2 port to the
On Friday 27 January 2006 02:00 am, David Banning wrote:
While spamassassin is executing I am getting this error;
Can't locate Razor2/Client/Agent.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 ../lib
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7/BSDPAN /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/mach
You can't run spamassassin as root (see your
configuration).
Well, it fall back to nobody user, because you don't
specify anything.
The problem is that the working directory is in root
dir (/root)
Well, spamassassin running in nobody try to write in
root directory ! It's forbidden
Edit you conf
pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 2703 flags S
keep state
Yes, here I have:
pass in log first quick proto tcp from x.x.x.x to any port = 2703 flags S keep
state group 200
Olivier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 01/04/05 08:59 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt sat at the `puter and typed:
SNIP
The only problem with doing this is that you have to completely
receive the e-mail message before SA can check it against the
blacklists.
We do the blacklist checks at the MTA level and turn them off in SA.
As a
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
Use with care. Some spam rbls are overly zealous, and often block out
whole netblocks just because one IP has been reported as an offender.
And all dialup networks. Which can lead to the bizarre situation that
if you're relaying through your mail server from a dialup IP,
On 01/04/05 05:17 PM, Matthias Buelow sat at the `puter and typed:
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
Use with care. Some spam rbls are overly zealous, and often block out
whole netblocks just because one IP has been reported as an offender.
And all dialup networks. Which can lead to the bizarre
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Louis LeBlanc
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 9:09 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin-Milter accuracy...
On 01/04/05 05:17 PM, Matthias Buelow sat at the `puter and typed
Eric
you'll prob need to retrain the bayes filters ( or a good starter at
www.fsl.com/support).
also alot of rules from the www.rulesemporium.com/rules.html can be useful.
Might want to look at some of the RBL.s and esp the URI rbl provided
by surbl.org and built into SA3.x
Could ask on the
On 01/03/05 08:34 PM, Martin Hepworth sat at the `puter and typed:
Eric
you'll prob need to retrain the bayes filters ( or a good starter at
www.fsl.com/support).
also alot of rules from the www.rulesemporium.com/rules.html can be useful.
I believe that's actually
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 10:16:58AM -0500, Rohit Kumar Mehta typed:
Hi Toomas I have this same problem Amavisd-new and SA 3.0.
I think the problem is that SA is invoked through amavisd (not spamc or
spamassassin).
I hope I do not have to make all my local changes through amavisd.conf.
Please
Chris Sechiatano wrote:
Hi,
I just converted my RedHat box to BSD 5.2.1 and installed Spamassassin with
Sendmail and Procmail. This is the same configuration I had on the RedHat
machine, but Spamassassin seems to not catch as much spam as it did before.
I get so much more junk in my inbox and
Hi,
I just converted my RedHat box to BSD 5.2.1 and installed Spamassassin
with
Sendmail and Procmail. This is the same configuration I had on the RedHat
machine, but Spamassassin seems to not catch as much spam as it did
before.
I get so much more junk in my inbox and they only get one
I had a quick question regarding this.
If I use sa-learn as root, does it learn just
for the root account or on a system wide basis.
Thanks
RR
-Original Message-
From: Rafi Jacoby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 1:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
It is possible the default install on RedHat has a lower 'score'
necessary for it to be flagged as spam. You can set this in the
configuration file.
Eric F Crist
President
AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc
(612) 998-3588
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
In the last episode (Jun 14), Rajamani, Rajarajan (Rajarajan) said:
I have installed the spamassassin milter and the clam av milter ports
and have made the following changes to the freebsd.mc file.
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin', `S=local:/var/run/spamass-milter.sock,
Since I use fetchmail/fetchyahoo/gotmail to retreive my
ISP/yahoo/hotmail accounts (where I get most spam), the mails
delivered to my mbox are not scanned by either clamd or spamd. I
checked that these tools are having the appropriate switches to
forward the pop'd mails to my account
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Rajamani, Rajarajan (Rajarajan) wrote:
I have installed the spamassassin milter and the clam av milter ports
and have made the following changes to the freebsd.mc file.
INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin', `S=local:/var/run/spamass-milter.sock,
F=,T=C:15m;S:4m;R:4m;E:10m')
Think I got it.
Not that I claim I know what I'm doing, but at last I got it somewhat working.
It's now filtering my Test Spam messages and ONLY those, to the desired
Spamfolder :-), but I doubt it's filtering on the number of stars as I
wants it to do.
What I did was the following steps :
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 12:31:25PM -0500, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Question...Is anyone else running amavisd-new with spamassassin from
ports?
Just started about a week ago, with dual-Sendmail setup + SA and
ClamAV.
If so, where/how should I be updating or altering the spamassassin
In the last episode (Mar 09), Pat said:
I was wondering exactly what the scope is on sa-learn.
what i mean by this is:
if i run sa-learn as root, does it get applied to the
global spam-assassin ruleset or only for my user?
do all my users need to run sa-learn on their spam/ham
files or
Yes, it required an upgrade to Perl5.6 to fix it in my case ... in my
case, it was with amavisd ... it has something to do with
Sys::Hostname::hostname() in Perl5.005 :(
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Mike Oliveri wrote:
Hi all,
I've recently upgraded both Exim (to 4.30) and SpamAssassin (to 2.63) on
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
