-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Warren Liddell wrote:
Up untill now i have been using XFree86 and being as it is basically no
longer updated or maintained, so im wishing to know the basic most
easiest way to change over from XFree to Xorg
If you're still running XFree86
After upgrading Xorg from 6.8 to 7.2, I got the following error when I start X.
(EE) Failed to load module xtt (module does not exist, 0 )
(EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0 )
(EE) Failed to load module module (module does not exist, 0 )
(EE) Failed to load module kbd
Xihong Yin wrote:
After upgrading Xorg from 6.8 to 7.2, I got the following error when I start
X.
(EE) Failed to load module xtt (module does not exist, 0 )
(EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0 )
(EE) Failed to load module module (module does not exist, 0 )
(EE) Failed
At 06:33 PM 9/06/2007, Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Warren Liddell wrote:
Up untill now i have been using XFree86 and being as it is basically no
longer updated or maintained, so im wishing to know the basic most
easiest way to change over from XFree
upgrading Xorg from 6.8 to 7.2, I got the following error when I
start X.
(EE) Failed to load module xtt (module does not exist, 0 )
(EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0 )
(EE) Failed to load module module (module does not exist, 0 )
(EE) Failed to load module kbd (module
On 09/06/07, Xihong Yin [EMAIL PROTECTED] top-posted:
Thank you for answering my question.
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Xihong Yin wrote:
After upgrading Xorg from 6.8 to 7.2, I got the following error when I
start X.
(EE) Failed to load module xtt (module does not exist
On 09/06/07, Mark Stout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 10:30 PM
To: Mark Stout
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE
On 08/06/07, Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 7:32 PM
To: Mark Stout
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE
On 09/06/07, Mark Stout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09/06/07, Xihong Yin [EMAIL PROTECTED] top-posted:
Thank you for answering my question.
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
Xihong Yin wrote:
After upgrading Xorg from 6.8 to 7.2, I got the following error
when I start X.
(EE) Failed to load
Hello,
I recently upgraded from 5.4-RELEASE to 6.2-STABLE. Now I'm having problems
with the TCP stack. I suspect its because of code differences. I may have
some older 5.4 code that was used during the build world process. For
example, here's a partial ifconfig -a output
fxp0:
On 08/06/07, Mark Stout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I recently upgraded from 5.4-RELEASE to 6.2-STABLE. Now I'm having problems
with the TCP stack. I suspect its because of code differences. I may have
some older 5.4 code that was used during the build world process. For
example, here's
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 9:12 PM
To: Mark Stout
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE
On 08/06/07, Mark Stout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I
On 08/06/07, Mark Stout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd prefer to remain at 6.2-STABLE but I can't find where the problem is
with these IP errors. I'm figuring I've got a mixed code and that's the
root cause but I'm not sure.
Did you remove your object directories before
starting the build?
Any help with this would be greatly appreciated. I'm following the UPDATING
file in /usr/ports, I'm trying to upgrade to Xorg 7.2.0 things were
running smoothly up until pkgdb -F reachded xdriinfo-1.0.1_1, here is the
output..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports]# pkgdb -F
--- Checking the package
On Tue, 22 May 2007 15:40:18 +0200
Christopher Prance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for XDRIINFO... yes
checking for library containing glXGetProcAddressARB... no
configure: error: cannot find GL library - make sure Mesa or other OpenGL
On 5/22/07, Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2007 15:40:18 +0200
Christopher Prance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for XDRIINFO... yes
checking for library containing glXGetProcAddressARB... no
configure:
On 5/22/07, Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry mate, dont have the asnwer but i'd try retrying the whole process now
that libGL has been installed...often something in the spaghetti of
dependencies gets fixed once you fix one little problem... it's been working
for me most of
El martes 22 de mayo a las 17:06:55 CEST, Christopher Prance escribió:
On 5/22/07, Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=== Building for mesa-demos-6.5.3_1
gmake[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/graphics/mesa-demos/work/Mesa-6.5.3/progs/demos'
cc -I../../include -fPIC -pedantic
. There is a
lot of interesting stuff there, but nothing about an audit group that
should be present (at least a search for audit group returned no
hits).
What is this error talking about? Which section of the UPDATING file
should I read and follow to correct this? I read, When upgrading
from one
to correct this? I read, When upgrading
from one major version to another it is generally best to upgrade to
the latest code in the currently installed branch first, then do an
upgrade to the new branch. Does this refer to an upgrade from, say,
5.1 to 6.2, or does this apply to 6.0 to 6.2 as well
On 5/18/07, Mikhail Goriachev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Falanga wrote:
You really must read the following (or at least skim through):
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html
and
/usr/src/Makefile
All correct instructions are in there and you
Andrew Falanga wrote:
On 5/18/07, Mikhail Goriachev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Falanga wrote:
You really must read the following (or at least skim through):
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html
and
/usr/src/Makefile
All correct instructions
On Fri, 18 May 2007 17:54:41 +0200, Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ok, I'm reading through the web link you sent. I see in section
23.4.1 the steps are:
# make buildworld
# make buildkernel
# make installkernel
# reboot
reboot to single user mode that is
# mergemaster -p
# make
Andrew Falanga wrote:
On 5/18/07, Mikhail Goriachev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Falanga wrote:
You really must read the following (or at least skim through):
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html
and
/usr/src/Makefile
All correct instructions
On 5/18/07, Andreas Rudisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 18 May 2007 17:54:41 +0200, Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In /usr/src/UPDATING you can find.
20060204:
The 'audit' group was added to support the new auditing
functionality
in the base system. Be sure to
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:38:31 -0400 quoth Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:30:20PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr
Scott Bennett wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:38:31 -0400 quoth Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Please note that I posted the first two items merely to inform the
readership of the existence of the problems. I only hoped for assistance
on the third problem.
Now, given that you are
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 11:30:20PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:13:40 -0400 Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
I've encountered three annoying problems since doing the upgrade from
6.1-RELEASE to 6.2-RELEASE using the upgrade option when booting from the
installation CD. This is on a Dell Inspiron XPS (3.4 GHz P4 w/HTT enabled
and 1 GB of memory).
1) The ports and packages subsystems are as
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:51:50PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
I've encountered three annoying problems since doing the upgrade from
6.1-RELEASE to 6.2-RELEASE using the upgrade option when booting from the
installation CD. This is on a Dell Inspiron XPS (3.4 GHz P4 w/HTT enabled
and 1
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:13:40 -0400 Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
--BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu,
choose to redirect my SMTP directly to my mail server- NOT A GOOD
IDEA.
So I see there are two methods of upgrading - sysinstall or makeworld- what
would be the optimal choice for someone with limited experience in the BSD
world-
Thanks
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information
mail-
lest I choose to redirect my SMTP directly to my mail server- NOT A GOOD
IDEA.
So I see there are two methods of upgrading - sysinstall or makeworld- what
would be the optimal choice for someone with limited experience in the BSD
world-
Thanks
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 11:02 AM
To: Jean-Paul Natola; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: UPGRADing from 5.4- Sysinstall or makeworld
The difference is a binary upgrade using sysinstall booting a later version
CD or using cvsup and a source install. Both should work fine for your
/usr/ports/UPDATING
/usr/ports/mail/dspam/files/UPDATING
/usr/ports/mail/dspam-devel/files/UPDATING
--
From: Derek Ragona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 11:02 AM
To: Jean-Paul Natola; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: UPGRADing from 5.4- Sysinstall
:02 AM
To: Jean-Paul Natola; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: UPGRADing from 5.4- Sysinstall or makeworld
The difference is a binary upgrade using sysinstall booting a later
version
CD or using cvsup and a source install. Both should work fine for
your
setup. If you want to go
I tried to upgrade vim, and I get a lot of these.
=== Cleaning for vim-7.0.214
= 7.0.189 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/vim.
= Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.0/.
7.0.189 100% of 2290 B 1487 kBps
= 7.0.190
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
I tried to upgrade vim, and I get a lot of these.
=== Cleaning for vim-7.0.214
= 7.0.189 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/vim.
= Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.0/.
7.0.189 100% of
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 09:40:09 Michael P. Soulier wrote:
I tried to upgrade vim, and I get a lot of these.
...
The number on the left just keeps going up and it just keeps spinning
it wheels.
Any suggestions?
As you have most likely noticed by now, it stopped at 7.0.214, which is
the
On 27/03/07 Kevin Brunelle said:
As you have most likely noticed by now, it stopped at 7.0.214, which is
the minor version of vim. Actually it's a patch version. vim applies a
series of patches to the original source instead of constantly releasing a
large file including all the source.
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've got ~770 ports install--many|most depencencies. Doesn't
-a rebuilt *everything*? If not, I've been sadly
mis-understanding the man page.
-a makes sure that everything is up-to-date, but it doesn't rebuild
ports that are already
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi people,
A day or three ago somebody posted a neat upgrade script
(or snippet of) using a shell for loop and pkg_version.
I was going to save, thought I saved it to ~/Mail/freebsd.
Can't find it. Anybody knw which post
-a get it?
I've got ~770 ports install--many|most depencencies. Doesn't
-a rebuilt *everything*? If not, I've been sadly
mis-understanding the man page.
On my fastest FBSD box I'd like to custom build all the ports
that need upgrading. Turn them
Hi people,
A day or three ago somebody posted a neat upgrade script
(or snippet of) using a shell for loop and pkg_version.
I was going to save, thought I saved it to ~/Mail/freebsd.
Can't find it. Anybody knw which post I'm thinking of?
It was
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 02:52:57PM -0700, Kent Stewart wrote:
On Saturday 17 March 2007 13:55, Gary Kline wrote:
Is there a set of switches that portupgrade will use to upgrade
(from src) _only_ the ports that need rebuilding? I'm guessing
not because it's either -arp or else
Is there a set of switches that portupgrade will use to upgrade
(from src) _only_ the ports that need rebuilding? I'm guessing
not because it's either -arp or else portupgrade exits without
doing anything!
My aim is to build every package just once here
On Saturday 17 March 2007 13:55, Gary Kline wrote:
Is there a set of switches that portupgrade will use to upgrade
(from src) _only_ the ports that need rebuilding? I'm guessing
not because it's either -arp or else portupgrade exits without
doing anything!
My
Taking this thread a little further since it is right in line with my todo
list for tonight. I currently have 6.1 installed on a Supermicro machine
with two ata drives. There has been a major bug that causes frequent kernel
panics which started at 6.0. The following build options seemed to help
What is the _easiest_ way to upgrade from a FreeBSD 6.1-stable install to a
6.2-stable install? I can't run freebsd-update because it doesn't know about
-stable, and I'd prefer to avoid doing a buildworld because of the time.
Any suggestions?
___
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:24:50 -0700 Don O'Neil wrote:
What is the _easiest_ way to upgrade from a FreeBSD 6.1-stable install to a
6.2-stable install? I can't run freebsd-update because it doesn't know about
-stable, and I'd prefer to avoid doing a buildworld because of the time.
Any
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 01:46, Rico Secada wrote:
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:33:02 +
dgmm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 26 February 2007 05:32, Rico Secada wrote:
Since I upgraded KDE to 3.5.5 Quanta+ always freezes when I try to
start it up. It doesn't do anything. No errors,
On Monday 26 February 2007 05:32, Rico Secada wrote:
Since I upgraded KDE to 3.5.5 Quanta+ always freezes when I try to start it
up. It doesn't do anything. No errors, just a freeze, and a CPU usage of
97%.
Has anyone else experienced problems with Quanta+ since KDE 3.5.5?
No, as I've not
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:33:02 +
dgmm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 26 February 2007 05:32, Rico Secada wrote:
Since I upgraded KDE to 3.5.5 Quanta+ always freezes when I try to start it
up. It doesn't do anything. No errors, just a freeze, and a CPU usage of
97%.
Has anyone
Hi
Since I upgraded KDE to 3.5.5 Quanta+ always freezes when I try to start it up.
It doesn't do anything. No errors, just a freeze, and a CPU usage of 97%.
Has anyone else experienced problems with Quanta+ since KDE 3.5.5?
Best regards.
Rico
___
Running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE .. ran CVSUP Today so all my ports/src is all up to
date.
No matter what i try i cant get the new version of Azureus to compile .. any
ideas/suggestions would be appreciated.
==
[javac] symbol : method
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 04:29:41PM +1000, Warren Liddell wrote:
Running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE .. ran CVSUP Today so all my ports/src is all up
to
date.
No matter what i try i cant get the new version of Azureus to compile .. any
ideas/suggestions would be appreciated.
Yes, it seems to be
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 04:29:41PM +1000, Warren Liddell wrote:
Running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE .. ran CVSUP Today so all my ports/src is all up
to
date.
No matter what i try i cant get the new version of Azureus to compile .. any
ideas/suggestions would be appreciated.
==
Running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE .. ran CVSUP Today so all my ports/src is all up to
date.
No matter what i try i cant get the new version of Azureus to compile .. any
ideas/suggestions would be appreciated.
==
[javac] symbol : method
Warren Liddell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE .. ran CVSUP Today so all my ports/src is all up
to
date.
No matter what i try i cant get the new version of Azureus to compile .. any
ideas/suggestions would be appreciated.
==
[javac] symbol :
Running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE .. ran CVSUP Today so all my ports/src is all up to
date.
No matter what i try i cant get the new version of Azureus to compile .. any
ideas/suggestions would be appreciated.
==
[javac] symbol : method
Warren Liddell writes:
Running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE
BUILD FAILED
Worked for me - running -CURRENT - within the last week.
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Robert Huff wrote:
Warren Liddell writes:
Running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE
BUILD FAILED
Worked for me - running -CURRENT - within the last week.
Robert Huff
From pkg_tree:
azureus-2.5.0.0_2
|\__ libdrm-2.0.2
|\__ pkg-config-0.21
|\__
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 06:59:25 -0800
Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From pkg_tree:
azureus-2.5.0.0_2
Latest version in ports is Azureus 2.5.0.4. I just did a portupgrade
yesterday including Azureus without problems.
Andreas
--
GnuPG key : 0x2A573565 |
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Andreas Rudisch wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 06:59:25 -0800
Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From pkg_tree:
azureus-2.5.0.0_2
Latest version in ports is Azureus 2.5.0.4. I just did a portupgrade
yesterday including Azureus without problems.
Andreas
--
GnuPG key
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 00:59, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Robert Huff wrote:
Warren Liddell writes:
Running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE
BUILD FAILED
Worked for me - running -CURRENT - within the last week.
Robert Huff
From pkg_tree:
Running FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE
==
[javac] symbol : method setSortColumn(org.eclipse.swt.widgets.TableColumn)
[javac] location: class org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Table
[javac]
table.setSortColumn(tc);
[javac]
John Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say:
There's a PR open for this with a working patch:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/108322
Download it and apply it in the ports/sysutils/xfce4-battery-plugin
directory then rebuild the port. It fixed the problem for me. I'm
Hi all,
I'm having a hard time upgrading xfce4 on a FreeBSD 6.1 box. I've
tried portupgrade first, but as it bumped into a boatload of errors I
eventually had to resort to upgrade individual packages. This left me
with a mix of packages of xfce versions 4.2 and 4.4, and a build
failure in xfce4
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Markus Hoenicka wrote:
I'm having a hard time upgrading xfce4 on a FreeBSD 6.1 box. I've
tried portupgrade first, but as it bumped into a boatload of errors I
eventually had to resort to upgrade individual packages. This left me
with a mix of packages of xfce versions 4.2
On Saturday 27 January 2007 11:21, Warren Block wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Markus Hoenicka wrote:
I'm having a hard time upgrading xfce4 on a FreeBSD 6.1 box. I've
tried portupgrade first, but as it bumped into a boatload of errors I
eventually had to resort to upgrade individual packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Warren Block wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Markus Hoenicka wrote:
I'm having a hard time upgrading xfce4 on a FreeBSD 6.1 box. I've
tried portupgrade first, but as it bumped into a boatload of errors I
eventually had to resort to upgrade
John Nielsen writes:
I second Warren's endorsement of the upgrade. :)
Now that I managed to get it up and running, I fully agree with both
of you :-)
BTW turns out I had an old version of libxfcegui4.so in /usr/X11R6/lib
which screwed up the build. After removing this library with its
Markus Hoenicka writes:
There's one thing broken though: After the upgrade, panel plugins fail
to display correct values. The battery monitor claims the battery of
my laptop is at 0%. The network monitor plugin also sees the traffic
at 0 kbyte/s no matter what I do. The volume plugin
On 2007-01-27 09:21, Warren Block [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pkg_delete or make deinstall everything xfce\* and libxfce\*, then
just install /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce4.
This is what I did on my laptop too.
From what I've seen so far, xfce4.4 is definitely worth it.
Totally worth it :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Hoenicka wrote:
Now that I managed to get it up and running, I fully agree with both
of you :-)
As expected :).
There's one thing broken though: After the upgrade, panel plugins fail
to display correct values. The battery monitor claims
On Saturday 27 January 2007 18:48, Markus Hoenicka wrote:
Markus Hoenicka writes:
There's one thing broken though: After the upgrade, panel plugins fail
to display correct values. The battery monitor claims the battery of
my laptop is at 0%. The network monitor plugin also sees the
With the EOL of FreeBSD 4.X coming close, I'm in the process of
upgrading to 6.2. According to
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/migration-guide.html#UPGRADE
Probably the most straightforward approach is that of ``backup
everything, reformat, reinstall, and restore user data''.
However
Diomidis Spinellis wrote:
Am I missing any obvious files
or directories I should copy over?
I didn't notice your SSH server keys on the list.
KDK
--
Reflections on Ice-Breaking
Candy
Is dandy
But liquor
Is quicker.
-- Ogden Nash
On 1/20/07, Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amarendra Godbole wrote:
Fetching metadata index... done.
Fetching 1 metadata patches. done.
Applying metadata patches... done.
Fetching 1 metadata files... failed.
Is this because of a connectivity issue on my end, or some issue with
Hello,
Today I have tried to upgrade my FBSD 6.1-stable release to 6.2. All went
well up to the point when I had to use mergemaster -cv.
It was my first encounter with mergemaster and I was a bit unsure what to
do with files in /etc. For some that I know I have not customized, I
pressed i for
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:15:24 +0100 (CET) Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
My question is what I messed up? Was this something during mergemaster
phase? If not, then what else could have gone wrong?
Yes, you probably messed up there.
Mergemaster shows you - I'll call them suggestions - for the config
On Saturday 20 January 2007 20:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terrific waste of bandwidth.
*shrug* i dont see it that way. i see it as insurance that when i build
kernels for 15 machines, they are all getting the cleanest sources possible,
with absolutely nothing left over from a previous
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 08:29:52 -0600 Jonathan Horne wrote:
Terrific waste of bandwidth.
*shrug* i dont see it that way. i see it as insurance that when i build
kernels for 15 machines, they are all getting the cleanest sources possible,
with absolutely nothing left over from a previous
Jonathan Horne wrote:
On Saturday 20 January 2007 20:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terrific waste of bandwidth.
*shrug* i dont see it that way. i see it as insurance that when i build
kernels for 15 machines, they are all getting the cleanest sources possible,
with absolutely nothing left
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:45:36AM -0500, Jeff Royle wrote:
Jonathan Horne wrote:
On Saturday 20 January 2007 20:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terrific waste of bandwidth.
*shrug* i dont see it that way. i see it as insurance that when i build
kernels for 15 machines,
they are all getting
Hello,
I am looking at this link:
http://mikestammer.com/dokuwiki/bsd:updateos
Would you think I am safe running these instructions to update 6.1 stable
to 6.2?
My one question is about this:
make clean;make cleanworld
Can they be used at one go? Or should I issue make clean and then make
On Saturday 20 January 2007 12:39, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
I am looking at this link:
http://mikestammer.com/dokuwiki/bsd:updateos
Would you think I am safe running these instructions to update 6.1 stable
to 6.2?
My one question is about this:
make clean;make cleanworld
Can
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
Hello,
I am looking at this link:
http://mikestammer.com/dokuwiki/bsd:updateos
Would you think I am safe running these instructions to update 6.1 stable
to 6.2?
My one question is about this:
make clean;make cleanworld
Can they be used at one go? Or should I
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:25:16 -0600 Jonathan Horne wrote:
usually, i:
rm -rf /usr/src/* /usr/obj/*
and then just cvsup a whole new set of sources. i then buildworld and
buildkernel as laid out in the handbook:
You do of course know that by doing that you also erase your custom
Christian Baer wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:25:16 -0600 Jonathan Horne wrote:
usually, i:
rm -rf /usr/src/* /usr/obj/*
and then just cvsup a whole new set of sources. i then buildworld and
buildkernel as laid out in the handbook:
You do of course know that by doing that you also erase
On Saturday 20 January 2007 15:40, Daniel A. wrote:
Christian Baer wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:25:16 -0600 Jonathan Horne wrote:
usually, i:
rm -rf /usr/src/* /usr/obj/*
and then just cvsup a whole new set of sources. i then buildworld and
buildkernel as laid out in the handbook:
On 20/01/07, Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rm -rf /usr/src/* /usr/obj/*
and then just cvsup a whole new set of sources.
Terrific waste of bandwidth.
--
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Amarendra Godbole wrote:
Fetching metadata index... done.
Fetching 1 metadata patches. done.
Applying metadata patches... done.
Fetching 1 metadata files... failed.
Is this because of a connectivity issue on my end, or some issue with
update1.freebsd.org? I don't see any connectivity
Hi,
I run 6.1-RELEASE, and am trying to upgrade it to 6.2-RELEASE using
the freebsd-update.sh script, and the instructions provided here:
http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2006-11-26-freebsd-6.1-to-6.2-binary-upgrade.html,
without success!
The script hits sporadic problems fetching files. For
I would like to perform the same update , but I would like to know how to
rollback if this has failed as it happened here.
We should be able to rollback to exact current state. Do you have an idea
Thanks
Dak
On 1/17/07, Amarendra Godbole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I run 6.1-RELEASE, and
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 23:24:56 +0200
Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-01-14 15:35, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[copious snippage]
2. Cd /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf which contains the file MYKERNEL
No it doesn't. CVSup
Hi folks,
from different sources I have written my steps to
compile a new kernel upgrade to the latest sources.
Can anyone have a look into them and tell me if I
won't run into troubles or if there are better ways to
achieve the same?
Upgrade procedure to the newest freebsd kernel and
userland.
From: Dino Vliet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 9:56 PM
Subject: advice on compiling a new kernel upgrading to the latest
sources
Hi folks,
from different sources I have written my steps to
compile a new kernel upgrade to the latest
On 2007-01-14 11:56, Dino Vliet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
from different sources I have written my steps to compile a new kernel
upgrade to the latest sources.
Your instructions, however, are different from what /usr/src/UPDATING
contains.
Please, make *sure* you read
Dino Vliet wrote:
Hi folks,
from different sources I have written my steps to
compile a new kernel upgrade to the latest sources.
Can anyone have a look into them and tell me if I
won't run into troubles or if there are better ways to
achieve the same?
Upgrade procedure to the newest freebsd
801 - 900 of 1952 matches
Mail list logo
