Where can one find an Apple USB to Phone connector? An internet search didn't
produce anything.
I (forgive me Nanny) have a new Mac Mini that I'd love to be able to fax from
through my modem.
Thanks,
George
On Sep 9, 2009, at 9/9/09 - 11:22 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at
On Dec 1, 2009, at 3:12 PM, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
Where can one find an Apple USB to Phone connector? An internet
search didn't produce anything.
I (forgive me Nanny) have a new Mac Mini that I'd love to be able to
fax from through my modem.
US Robotics sells one:
Thanks, Bruce. Man, they think a lot of them.
George
On Dec 1, 2009, at 12/1/09 - 4:19 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Dec 1, 2009, at 3:12 PM, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
Where can one find an Apple USB to Phone connector? An internet
search didn't produce anything.
I (forgive me Nanny)
On Dec 1, 2009, at 5:12 PM, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
Where can one find an Apple USB to Phone connector? An internet
search didn't produce anything.
I (forgive me Nanny) have a new Mac Mini that I'd love to be able
to fax from through my modem.
Thanks,
George
Do you have a USB
Bill Connelly wrote:
My insurance company hasn't discovered https I guess, so they require
info FAXed to them.
After creating some kind of pre-paper-like document on my Mac, can I
FAX it over the internet using some hidden capability of OS X? or
maybe NeoOffice? some other app for OS
On Sep 10, 2009, at 3:35 AM, Charles Lenington wrote:
Bill Connelly wrote:
My insurance company hasn't discovered https I guess, so they require
info FAXed to them.
After creating some kind of pre-paper-like document on my Mac, can I
FAX it over the internet using some hidden capability
At 12:37 AM -0400 9/10/09, Bill Connelly wrote:
I think the difference between the Fax PDF and an e-mailed PDF is that
it doesn't sit on someone's Server, where someone could possibly get a
copy of it (is that even possible???).
It goes directly to hard copy via their fax printer. Make sense?
From: Bill Connelly billycarm...@verizon.net
Subject: Re: FAX from a Mac under OS X 10.5.7?
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2009, 6:42 PM
On Sep 9, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Bill Connelly wrote:
Guess I need
On Sep 10, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Jonas Lopez wrote:
I may be a little slow here, but are you connecting the phone line
that provides DSL without a filter to the builtin modem or not OR is
this some special way the DSL line (the only one I have connected to
the computer) is now sending
At 13:03 -0700 9/10/09, Jonas Lopez wrote:
From: Bill Connelly billycarm...@verizon.net
Subject: Re: FAX from a Mac under OS X 10.5.7?
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2009, 6:42 PM
On Sep 9, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:57 AM
At 13:14 -0700 9/10/09, Bruce Johnson wrote:
I hate that the cable and phone companies
promulgated the misnomer 'modem' to refer to what is actually a
router, it makes thing like this confusing as heck.
MODEM stands for modulator / demodulator.
The DSL modem demodulates asynchronous
Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Sep 10, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Jonas Lopez wrote:
I may be a little slow here, but are you connecting the phone line
that provides DSL without a filter to the builtin modem or not OR is
this some special way the DSL line (the only one I have connected to
the
Doug McNutt wrote:
FAX using a modem, my G4 has one built in, goes out in the form of quadrature
modulated (QAM) 1400 Hz carrier on a normal telephone line. Dual tone
multifrequency (DTMF) is used for dialing the number but not for data
transmission.
Both the QAM and the DTMF are well
My insurance company hasn't discovered https I guess, so they require
info FAXed to them.
After creating some kind of pre-paper-like document on my Mac, can I
FAX it over the internet using some hidden capability of OS X? or
maybe NeoOffice? some other app for OS X on a G4?
Maybe my
On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:15 AM, Bill Connelly wrote:
My insurance company hasn't discovered https I guess, so they require
info FAXed to them.
After creating some kind of pre-paper-like document on my Mac, can I
FAX it over the internet using some hidden capability of OS X? or
maybe
it!' invite that went out for
today...new iPods?? )
Otherwise there are commercial email-to-fax gateways, such as efax.com
Thanks.
My DA had its modem removed when the eBay Seller upgraded it to a Dual
533, but my Yikes! (10.4.11) and QS 2002 Dual 1GHz (10.5.7) both have
their modems.
Guess I
There are a couple listed in this article:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/171435/19_free_web_services_that_keep_saving_you_money.html?tk=nl_dnx_t_crawl
I dropped my land line so I need to take note of this as well.
Previously I would fax from the computer.
I have only tried efax as an
On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Bill Connelly wrote:
Guess I need to temporarily bypass the DSL connection, hook up the
modem, and FAX away using OS Xs pdf to fax capability before/after
creating a pdf ... thanks.
No you shouldn't need to bypass the DSL connection to do this...the
modem is
On Sep 9, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Bill Connelly wrote:
Guess I need to temporarily bypass the DSL connection, hook up the
modem, and FAX away using OS Xs pdf to fax capability before/after
creating a pdf ... thanks.
No you shouldn't need to
At 9:42 PM -0400 9/9/09, Bill Connelly wrote:
Thanks All.
Worked like a charm from my Yikes! OCd 450MHz under Tiger 10.4.11.
TextEdit Print Fax PDF after creating an Address Book entry.
Take That The Hartford in Lexington, KY!
I love how they tell you they have to take a fax as it's more
On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:47 PM, diane wrote:
At 9:42 PM -0400 9/9/09, Bill Connelly wrote:
Thanks All.
Worked like a charm from my Yikes! OCd 450MHz under Tiger 10.4.11.
TextEdit Print Fax PDF after creating an Address Book entry.
Take That The Hartford in Lexington, KY!
I love how
10.5.7 on it?
On Aug 7, 11:10 pm, ll mlitwin3...@att.net wrote:
Will there be a problem? I just had this computer upgraded from
733 to 933 and added ram to total 1.3.I don't have 10.5 dvds to
reinstall if there is a major problem.
Yes, you should -- some time later. There is always a risk
On 8/6/09 12:18 PM, Dan wrote:
Many people like Thunderbird
And I'm one of those people who even think T-bird beta is better than
mail.app. Try it!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a
group for
At 7:45 AM -0700 8/8/2009, Al Poulin wrote:
On Aug 7, 11:10 pm, ll mlitwin3...@att.net wrote:
Will there be a problem? I just had this computer upgraded from
733 to 933 and added ram to total 1.3.I don't have 10.5 dvds to
reinstall if there is a major problem.
Yes, you should -- some
On Aug 6, 2009, at 1:51 AM, Kyle Hansen wrote:
Mail is a flawed application. I see it start crashing when the
mailbox gets
to be a gig or so. I highly recommend to my tech clients not to use
it and
get a real mail app. Not the freebie. You get what you pay
for...cept for
Firefox.
At 11:50 AM -0400 8/6/2009, Stanton Mitrany wrote:
On Aug 6, 2009, at 1:51 AM, Kyle Hansen wrote:
Mail is a flawed application.
But getting better as time goes by.
What real mail app would you recommend?
If you keep your mailboxes reasonable, Mail should work fine.
Many people like
2009/8/4 Dan dantear...@gmail.com:
At 10:14 PM -0400 8/3/2009, Stanton Mitrany wrote:
the Dock's Mail icon bouncing attracted my attention. I clicked on
it and was informed that (or something like this) directory is
broken. To fix it, you need to quit Mail.
Hate it when that happens.
I
On Aug 4, 3:30 pm, Dan dantear...@gmail.com wrote:
Backup ~/Library/Mail -- just in case.
Move ~/Library/Mail/Envelope Index to your desktop.
Launch Mail and let it re-index things.
That Envelope Index is a sqlite database that gets corrupted easily.
I like Dan's answer better than
At 5:08 PM +0100 8/5/2009, Liam Proven wrote:
2009/8/4 Dan dantear...@gmail.com:
Personally, I would never let any inbox grow to over a few hundred
messages. Organize things - Mail supports folders with multiple
mailboxes.
That seems a bit much!
I have hundreds of folders inside
On 8/5/09 7:17 PM, Dan dantear...@gmail.com Broadcast into the ether:
I didn't say per folder. I said the INBOX in APPLE MAIL (which is
the application we're discussing).
Subsequent folders / mailboxes can be gigantic. It's the INBOX
that's critical -- it's got multiple threads writing
On 8/3/09 8:14 PM, Stanton Mitrany wrote:
Does it sound as if my mail database is irretrievable?
If you do find your database, move to Thunderbird. Actually, why not
give it a try to recover your database?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
At 10:14 PM -0400 8/3/2009, Stanton Mitrany wrote:
the Dock's Mail icon bouncing attracted my attention. I clicked on
it and was informed that (or something like this) directory is
broken. To fix it, you need to quit Mail.
Hate it when that happens.
I obeyed, and then re-launched Mail. I was
Opinions interspersed below;
On Aug 3, 2009, at 10:14 PM, Stanton Mitrany wrote:
Hi folks,
While momentarily attending something on Safari, the Dock's Mail
icon bouncing attracted my attention. I clicked on it and was
informed that (or something like this) directory is broken. To fix
Hi folks,
While momentarily attending something on Safari, the Dock's Mail icon bouncing
attracted my attention. I clicked on it and was informed that (or something
like this) directory is broken. To fix it, you need to quit Mail.
I obeyed, and then re-launched Mail. I was confronted with
I seem to have successfully CCC 3.2.1 Clone/Installed Leopard 10.5.7
on my DA Dual 533. It is an original QS 2002 Dual 1GHz installation
and upgrade, cloned over my Network.
My newly adopted DA has a 896MB RAM, a Geforce4 MX Mac Edition video
card, and a 500GB Seagate ATA off a Sonnet Trio
On Jun 14, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Bill Connelly wrote:
Comments welcomed. For starters, will I possibly wear out the 533
Dual cpu?
CPUs do not wear out. They do suffer from overheat, however.
If you install the heat sink correctly, and the fan is in good
condition, you will never in your
Has anyone run Rember 0.3.4b (2007) successfully under 10.5.7?
I just tried once and got a kp on trying to run using Quit all
applications, Quit Finder Preferences ...
Maybe I should go the applejack Memtest route?
Bill Connelly
artsite: http://mysite.verizon.net/moonstoneartstudio
myspace
On Jun 8, 2009, at 7:36 AM, George R. Hozendorf wrote:
On Jun 7, 2009, at 7:32 PM, insightinmind wrote:
10.5.7 seems to be running ok now with my 9 Steps outlined
earlier ... sort of modeled after that 12-Steps How to Debug kp's in
OS X thing someone shared awhile back ...
Bill, please
://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list/browse_thread/thread/
dce5dc5470e66063/6365129f0cf421ab#
... let's see, it starts out as:
To try and resolve my Upgrade to 10.5.7 issues, I have since done
this, and am currently claiming success: ...
and is my Jun 7 entry in this thread.
Its basically using
On Jun 7, 2009, at 7:31 PM, PeterH wrote:
On Jun 7, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Kyle Hansen wrote:
FWIW ... manually dowloading the 10.5.7 combo update directly from
Apple's site worked perfectly on every Mack or Hack which I have.
Whereas, automatically downloading the model-specific update
Download the 10.5.7 combo updater. INSTALL. Even if you have upgraded.
That will resolve all OS issues. I did it on this laptop just a few mins
ago. Then go get updated drivers for your 3rd party stuff and/or reinstall.
Kyle Hansen (in the livingroom
Kyle Hansen wrote:
On 6/6/09 11:02 AM, Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu Broadcast
into the ether:
On Jun 6, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Bill Connelly wrote:
They recommend use of Repair Permissions to cleanup a system prior to
installing their drivers, and then one after installing them.
On Jun 7, 2009, at 2:03 AM, Clark Martin wrote:
Is it JUST Apples files or anything using THE Installer and leaving
Receipts files, I would think it's the latter.
You're correct, it's the latter. For example, Flash Player always
installs files with alternate permissions, and Disk
On Jun 7, 2009, at 2:38 AM, Kyle Hansen wrote:
Download the 10.5.7 combo updater. INSTALL. Even if you have
upgraded.
That will resolve all OS issues. I did it on this laptop just a
few mins
ago. Then go get updated drivers for your 3rd party stuff and/or
reinstall.
That's
On Jun 7, 2009, at 1:03 AM, Clark Martin wrote:
It just shows they don't know what is happening inside
So, what's really is happening inside of a Permission Repair order?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's
On Jun 7, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Kyle Hansen wrote:
FWIW ... manually dowloading the 10.5.7 combo update directly from
Apple's site worked perfectly on every Mack or Hack which I have.
Whereas, automatically downloading the model-specific update, through
Software Update ..., failed in EVERY
On Jun 7, 2009, at 5:45 PM, Kyle Hansen wrote:
On 6/7/09 7:48 AM, insightinmind billycarm...@verizon.net
Broadcast into
the ether:
That's actually what I did ... used the 10.5.7 Combo updater on my
working 10.5.6 OS X.
Did you download it from Apple's site or did you use the software
On Jun 5, 12:44 pm, insightinmind billycarm...@verizon.net wrote:
After replacing my 10.5.6, and doing some file repairs and removal of
a flaky USB2 card, I am ready to try again with the 10.5.7 update on
my QS 2002 Dual 1GHz.
Any 10.5.7 Combo Up(to)date Comments?
On three machines
On Jun 6, 2009, at 12:04 PM, Al Poulin wrote:
On Jun 5, 12:44 pm, insightinmind billycarm...@verizon.net wrote:
After replacing my 10.5.6, and doing some file repairs and removal of
a flaky USB2 card, I am ready to try again with the 10.5.7 update on
my QS 2002 Dual 1GHz.
Any 10.5.7
On Jun 6, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Bill Connelly wrote:
They recommend use of Repair Permissions to cleanup a system prior to
installing their drivers, and then one after installing them. Really
seems like they're admitting to faulty systems programming on their
part ... not keeping up with
in their /
Library/Receipts bom files.
So ... when someone does a Combo update like 10.5.7, and the
resulting system acts as I described above in my hijacking of this
thread, what gives? (bluescreen freeze, and kps when trying to access
the Dock early in a Startup (mds seems to be running, too
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Bruce Johnson
john...@pharmacy.arizona.eduwrote:
On Jun 6, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Bill Connelly wrote:
They recommend use of Repair Permissions to cleanup a system prior to
installing their drivers, and then one after installing them. Really
seems like
On 6/6/09 11:02 AM, Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu Broadcast
into the ether:
On Jun 6, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Bill Connelly wrote:
They recommend use of Repair Permissions to cleanup a system prior to
installing their drivers, and then one after installing them. Really
seems like
Technician. I to it for a living. Bruce
is right.
As he almost always isdidn't I get you with 1 wrong answer? Or
semi-wrong?
Kyle Hansen
To try and resolve my Upgrade to 10.5.7 issues, I have since done
this, and am currently claiming success:
1. Manually/otherwise Uninstall M-Audio
On Jun 5, 2009, at 9:44 AM, insightinmind wrote:
Any 10.5.7 Combo Up(to)date Comments?
Works properly on my Macks and my Hacks.
Installed on my Hacks first, and the Combo Updater was indeed
required, but none of the other steps were (two executions of
permissions repairs and use of Safe
On May 24, 2009, at 9:00 PM, Herbert Goodfriend wrote:
I received the following advice in the latest TechRestore e-mail
bulletin (which they apparently obtained from MacFixit):
Since the 10.5.7 update was released, we have had a number of systems
come in for repair with related problems
On May 24, 2009, at 8:29 PM, Meghrouni Vince wrote:
Thank you, did attempt. 10.5.6 HD too unstable to complete download.
Ok, so your backup AND your updated disks are unstable.
This is NEW information, and indicates that the problems with 10.5.7
may not be related to 10.5.7
Will do - thank you!
On May 23, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Kris Tilford wrote:
On May 23, 2009, at 5:45 PM, Meghrouni Vince wrote:
Downloaded 10.5.7 and installed. Starts up, apps, volumes and files
appear on desktop, spotlight indexing in process. Goes to blue
screen. Finder starts up again
:
Downloaded 10.5.7 and installed. Starts up, apps, volumes and files
appear on desktop, spotlight indexing in process. Goes to blue
screen. Finder starts up again, repeats process again and again.
Help.
Try Safe Boot by holding the Shift key at startup. If it starts
normally, reboot
I was wrong about that - for some reason it started up on 10.5.6,
which is the system on my backup volume. This is nuts.
On May 23, 2009, at 4:29 PM, Kris Tilford wrote:
On May 23, 2009, at 5:45 PM, Meghrouni Vince wrote:
Downloaded 10.5.7 and installed. Starts up, apps, volumes
need, I've installed a larger HD, cloned the contents
of the original HD onto the larger one and have been using the larger
one to operate. I downloaded the 10.5.7 upgrade and installed it on
the larger HD, which had been 10.5.6. 10.5.6 remains on the smaller,
original HD.
After installing
, the one with 10.5.7 and same exactly the
same thing happened.
What the bleep is going on here? Anybody know?
Are you saying that you're booting in 10.5.6 from the drive you
thought you installed the 10.5.7 upgrade on?
Something happened during the update procedure.
What I would do
disc in prefs, making
sure to
choose the proper volume, the one with 10.5.7 and same exactly the
same thing happened.
What the bleep is going on here? Anybody know?
Are you saying that you're booting in 10.5.6 from the drive you
thought you installed the 10.5.7 upgrade on?
It sounds
10.5.6 is on one hard drive. 10.5.6 is on another. 10.5.7 boots, but
gets stuck in a loop - once it's fully up, after a minute, it goes
to blue screen, and then quickly to up, then a minute goes by, then
it goes to blue screen and repeats the process.
But, if you boot it and zap the pram
Nope. I can boot from the drive that 10.5.7 is installed on. But it
only lasts for one minute and goes to blue screen, then comes up again
quickly, then goes to blue screen again and repeats it until you force
quit. Once it actually worked for awhile inexplicably but next time
On May 24, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Meghrouni Vince wrote:
Dumb question: Where do I get the combo update? I downloaded mine by
choosing Software Update in the apple pull down menu.
(not dumb ... its seems hidden to me)
Currently its located at:
I received the following advice in the latest TechRestore e-mail
bulletin (which they apparently obtained from MacFixit):
Since the 10.5.7 update was released, we have had a number of systems
come in for repair with related problems. I'm sorry to say that I
even got stung with this one
On May 24, 2009, at 3:56 PM, Meghrouni Vince wrote:
Dumb question: Where do I get the combo update? I downloaded mine by
choosing Software Update in the apple pull down menu.
Go to Apple's website, and you'll ind it under Support Downloads.
--
Bruce Johnson
U of Az College of Pharmacy
Thank you, did attempt. 10.5.6 HD too unstable to complete download.
On May 24, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On May 24, 2009, at 3:56 PM, Meghrouni Vince wrote:
Dumb question: Where do I get the combo update? I downloaded mine
by
choosing Software Update in the apple pull
Downloaded 10.5.7 and installed. Starts up, apps, volumes and files
appear on desktop, spotlight indexing in process. Goes to blue
screen. Finder starts up again, repeats process again and again.
Help.
Vince Meghrouni
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
On May 23, 2009, at 5:45 PM, Meghrouni Vince wrote:
Downloaded 10.5.7 and installed. Starts up, apps, volumes and files
appear on desktop, spotlight indexing in process. Goes to blue
screen. Finder starts up again, repeats process again and again.
Help.
Try Safe Boot by holding
On May 14, 3:19 pm, Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu
wrote:
On May 14, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Steve R wrote:
At 9:01 AM -0700 5/14/09, Bruce Johnson posted:
1st Gen Intel iMac, hung on the reboot, then rebooted a second time
after I booted it in safe mode, but it's looking ok now.
At 3:21 PM -0500 5/13/2009, Kris Tilford wrote:
On May 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Dan wrote:
At 1:48 AM -0500 5/13/09, Kris Tilford wrote:
After installing, I ran Repair Permissions again.
Took nearly 1 hour! Really slow! Many wrong permissions!
That's not normal at all. Do a repair disk
QS 2002 Dual 1GHz w/ replacement mobo.
Update from 10.5.6 went well after manual download of non-Combo
package ...
~6-7 minutes installation time, and 2 auto Restarts.
Xbench 1.3 may have dropped ~1% overall score.
Bill Connelly
artsite: http://mysite.verizon.net/moonstoneartstudio
myspace:
1st Gen Intel iMac, hung on the reboot, then rebooted a second time
after I booted it in safe mode, but it's looking ok now.
Weird.
--
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group
Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs
iBook G4, 1.33ghz, 1.25gb ram. No extras, except for Menu Meters.
Initial reboot took about 10 minutes, followed by a bootloader kernal
panic. Crossed my fingers, powered down, booted again and all has been
well since.
Did see a lot of failed updates at work yesterday though.
m
On May
At 9:01 AM -0700 5/14/09, Bruce Johnson posted:
1st Gen Intel iMac, hung on the reboot, then rebooted a second time
after I booted it in safe mode, but it's looking ok now.
Weird.
My neighbour updated the same machine last night via Software Update
and experienced the exact same thing.
On May 14, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Steve R wrote:
At 9:01 AM -0700 5/14/09, Bruce Johnson posted:
1st Gen Intel iMac, hung on the reboot, then rebooted a second time
after I booted it in safe mode, but it's looking ok now.
Weird.
My neighbour updated the same machine last night via Software
I'm having trouble with the Webkit nightly build of Safari, it hangs
then crashes trying to open. Safari 4 public beta has an update to be
installed after the 10.5.7 update and that seems to work just fine. If
you are running the Safari 4 public beta you should run software
update after
I'm having trouble even connecting via Software Update. It sat
spinning its Aqua Bar for an hour ...
Could have changing my mobo affected my SLA connectivity? I didn't
think Apple was so saavy/picky.
I see the upgrades on the Apple site ... I have 10.5.6 on my QS
2002 ... is the Combo the
Powerbook 1.33 Mhz 12 inch G4 a little bit long install and a little bit
long first start but ok.
2009/5/13 Bill Connelly billycarm...@verizon.net
I'm having trouble even connecting via Software Update. It sat
spinning its Aqua Bar for an hour ...
Could have changing my mobo affected my SLA
, or Akamai, because Apple has
Akamai servers all over the place to load balance.
I see the upgrades on the Apple site ... I have 10.5.6 on my QS
2002 ... is the Combo the way to go?
No, you're going from 10.5.6 to 10.5.7 you'll want the regular update,
not the combo.
You only need the combo
Just checked on my work DA running 10.4.11 and there is a Security
Update also available for 10.4.
77.3 MB, and downloading now, says 6 minutes, but we are on a low end
dsl here.
Len
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
On May 12, 2009, at 11:48 PM, Kris Tilford wrote:
No problem with Software Update on my dual 2.3 GHz G5 for the 466MB
version.
As expected, there were some surprises ... some VERY RUDE
surprises ... with the latest, and possibly the last update to 10.5,
10.5.7.
At least in the one Hack
with
10.5, 10.4, 10.3 Server and 10.3, had the update from 10.5.6 to
10.5.7 installed today, perfectly, from the very large Combo Update
(which had been separately downloaded and written to a DVD), and
10.4.11 had the security update applied, perfectly as well.
10.4.11 is this computer's
At 1:48 AM -0500 5/13/09, Kris Tilford wrote:
No problem with Software Update on my dual 2.3 GHz G5 for the 466MB
version.
I ran Disk UtilityRepair Permissions before installing the 10.5.7
update, nothing wrong.
After installing, I ran Repair Permissions again.
Took nearly 1 hour! Really
On May 13, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Bill Connelly wrote:
I'm having trouble even connecting via Software Update. It sat
spinning its Aqua Bar for an hour ...
Could have changing my mobo affected my SLA connectivity? I didn't
think Apple was so saavy/picky.
I see the upgrades on the Apple site
Update went well on my QS. No problems at all.
Peter M.
Sent with my mobile device
-Original Message-
From: Amanda Ward amanda.w...@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 11:28:27
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Anyone update to 10.5.7 yet?
On May 13, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Bill
On May 13, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Amanda Ward wrote:
One odd change noted... the icon for the Energy Saver Preference Pane
changed from an incandescent bulb to a compact fluorescent bulb on my
iMac, but not on the Powerbook!?
Is the iMac an Intel system? That prefs pane may have been only
On May 13, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On May 13, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Amanda Ward wrote:
One odd change noted... the icon for the Energy Saver Preference Pane
changed from an incandescent bulb to a compact fluorescent bulb on my
iMac, but not on the Powerbook!?
Is the iMac
is quad-booted with
10.5, 10.4, 10.3 Server and 10.3, had the update from 10.5.6 to
10.5.7 installed today, perfectly, from the very large Combo Update
(which had been separately downloaded and written to a DVD), and
10.4.11 had the security update applied, perfectly as well.
10.4.11
On May 13, 2009, at 12:52 PM, Dan wrote:
At 1:48 AM -0500 5/13/09, Kris Tilford wrote:
After installing, I ran Repair Permissions again.
Took nearly 1 hour! Really slow! Many wrong permissions!
That's not normal at all. Do a repair disk on that volume.
I did verify disk beforehand, it
-booted with
10.5, 10.4, 10.3 Server and 10.3, had the update from 10.5.6 to
10.5.7 installed today, perfectly, from the very large Combo Update
(which had been separately downloaded and written to a DVD), and
10.4.11 had the security update applied, perfectly as well.
10.4.11
On May 13, 2009, at 2:11 PM, Baha Ata wrote:
uptade was clean... just installation and restart after it was
slow... but
now my G4 Powerbook become so slow... anyone have same problem or
feeling...
responsiviness gone... what i need to do... it is getting hotter i
guess too
Check to
On May 13, 2009, at 1:39 PM, Peter wrote:
Update went well on my QS. No problems at all.
Peter M.
Sent with my mobile device
No problem with update, dual 1.8/5gb ram
Bequette Jeff
jbeque...@tconl.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
Mine says 4-6 hours, must be a huge demand.
Just a message from Doug...
http://groups.google.com/group/hq-a + A home for the Hackintosh
community.
To subscribe to the HQ-A group, send email to hq-a
+subscr...@googlegroups.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Doug Burton slu...@embarqmail.com wrote:
Mine says 4-6 hours, must be a huge demand.
I just downloaded and installed the update on my Nehalem Mac Pro
8-core, and the 449mb download and install went smoothly. I was really
looking forward to this update because a
On May 12, 2009, at 2:27 PM, Doug Burton wrote:
Mine says 4-6 hours, must be a huge demand.
I think Apple's servers are getting hammered. It just failed
downloading twice for me, which is a first.
Oddly mine (for an Intel iMac 1st gen) was 449 MB, not 256 MB.
--
Bruce Johnson
University
On May 12, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 2:27 PM, Doug Burton wrote:
Mine says 4-6 hours, must be a huge demand.
I think Apple's servers are getting hammered. It just failed
downloading twice for me, which is a first.
Oddly mine (for an Intel iMac 1st
Bruce Johnson wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 2:27 PM, Doug Burton wrote:
Mine says 4-6 hours, must be a huge demand.
I think Apple's servers are getting hammered. It just failed
downloading twice for me, which is a first.
Oddly mine (for an Intel iMac 1st gen) was 449 MB, not 256
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
