>From reading these suggestions, it sounds like if you're very low
budget, start with a Digital Audio and then wait for G5's to get
cheaper. On the other hand, if you have the money (and perhaps the
workload to justify it), the G5's are worth a serious look instead.
--~--~-~--~~---
On 20/12/2008, at 4:11 PM, MIKO .. wrote:
>
> I'm using Leopard.
>
> I'm probably spacing out but- why don't I always see an Outbox or
> Drafts folder? I've seen the drafts folder come and go, but never (or
> rarely) the outbox- and I know I'm sending a large zip file right now-
> so whewre can
On Dec 19, 2008, at 8:14 PM, Mike Baker wrote:
>
> Your best bet is to get a 256 MB RAM module and replace the 128 MB
> RAM module with it, or if you have four RAM slots, add another 128
> MB RAM module. I just took the RAM in my G$ Sawtooth from 896 RAM
> to 1.5 GB RAM. It has four slots,
> Hi! Yeah, I see it but I could have sworn my machine passed the
> requirements. I checked them again and again.
>
>
> Intel iMac 2.4gHz Core 2 Duo
> 1GB RAM, 250GB Hard Drive, OS 10.5.5
>
This machine was not mentioned in the original post. CS4 should
install in an intel iMac.
One thing I noti
>From reading these suggestions, it sounds like if you're very low
budget, start with a Digital Audio and then wait for G5's to get
cheaper. On the other hand, if you have the money (and perhaps the
workload to justify it), the G5's are worth a serious look instead.
--~--~-~--~~---
Hi! Yeah, I see it but I could have sworn my machine passed the
requirements. I checked them again and again.
But oh well.
Anne Keller Smith
Down to Earth Web Design
G4 Quicksilver 733mHz Tower
896 MB RAM, 40 GB hard drive, OS 10.4.11
Intel iMac 2.4gHz Core 2 Duo
1GB RAM, 250GB Hard Drive, O
I'm using Leopard.
I'm probably spacing out but- why don't I always see an Outbox or
Drafts folder? I've seen the drafts folder come and go, but never (or
rarely) the outbox- and I know I'm sending a large zip file right now-
so whewre can I easily go to see the file on its way out?
I'm a
> Trying to install Adobe CS. I thought I was all ready, have 896 MB of
> RAM.
>
> It sez here (http://www.adobe.com/products/creativesuite/design/
> systemreqs/?promoid=DRHWP)
> "1GB of RAM or more recommended" so why won't the Installer let me
> install?
CS4 doesn't work on your Quicksilver.
Keeping it relatively brief: my Sonnet Tango FW/USB no longer danced/
played well with the others under 10.5.4 (also projecting to 10.5.5
and 10.5.6) ... maybe its age ... maybe 10.5.4(5,6) // USB/FW ... now
finishing up Steve's suggested Nuke & Pave back to 10.5.4, using my
original nvidi
On Dec 19, 11:25 am, Vic wrote:
> On Dec 18, 12:25 pm, nestamicky wrote:
>
> > And by best I mean, which of these G4 Desktop-Sawtooth, DA, etc is best
> > to get for optimum upgrade? I have a Sawtooth now, but feel as though I
> > could put some money on and upgrade a better machine in this li
Your best bet is to get a 256 MB RAM module and replace the 128 MB RAM module
with it, or if you have four RAM slots, add another 128 MB RAM module. I just
took the RAM in my G$ Sawtooth from 896 RAM to 1.5 GB RAM. It has four slots,
so the first two slots are 512 MB RAM modules and the last tw
My Reply follows quote. On 19/12/2008 17:02 earth...@ptd.net said:
>Hi -
>
>Trying to install Adobe CS. I thought I was all ready, have 896 MB of
>RAM.
>
>It sez here (http://www.adobe.com/products/creativesuite/design/
>systemreqs/?promoid=DRHWP)
> "1GB of RAM or more recommended" so why w
I got my G4 733 mHz Quicksilver in early 2002 when they stopped
making it for $1399.
It is still going strong for the most part, and hasn't needed out of
warranty repairs,
all I have shelled out has been for 2 OS upgrades, Jaguar and Tiger.
So ... do the math. This is one affordable machine.
Hi -
Trying to install Adobe CS. I thought I was all ready, have 896 MB of
RAM.
It sez here (http://www.adobe.com/products/creativesuite/design/
systemreqs/?promoid=DRHWP)
"1GB of RAM or more recommended" so why won't the Installer let me
install?
It doesn't say "required."
Any workarou
On Dec 19, 2008, at 6:37 PM, John Callahan wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2008, at 11:46 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Yeah!! Yeah!! I know what you mean, but it buggs me to hear "Tax
>> deductable", when in fact "It's an INCOME deduction" when calculating
>> tax liability.
>>
>> Say what
On Dec 18, 2008, at 11:46 PM, Charles Davis wrote:
>>
>>
>>
> Yeah!! Yeah!! I know what you mean, but it buggs me to hear "Tax
> deductable", when in fact "It's an INCOME deduction" when calculating
> tax liability.
>
> Say what you mean, and Mean what you say. And don't let the mentally
> lazy
On Dec 19, 2008, at 12:40 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
> ?? If you're doing the kinds of stuff you do with computers than need
> multiple video cards and lots of high=speed internal storage, you more
> than likely need the added power of a Mac Pro anyway.
No kidding ! need a Mac Pro! And yet I don
In 1995 I paid $1,000 for my IIci 240MB HDD, 32MB RAM, Daystar
Turbo601/66 accelerator card, 10 BaseT ethernet, and 14" apple
monitor. I added a Supermac thunder/24 video card and a PAS 16 Audio
card. (those cost me $100)Sold my powerbook 180 to pay for it, as
I recall I still had mo
On Dec 19, 2008, at 1:03 PM, MIKO .. wrote:
> I
> remember that I had a Quadra 605 and I was definitely not rich when I
> bought that-
That's the same costs as an iMac 20" today, $1300.
About right; They were the continuation of the LC series, for 'Low
Cost"...the Mac II for the rest of us
At 12:03 PM -0800 12/19/2008, MIKO .. wrote:
>On Dec 19, 2008, at 7:58 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
>
>> Also, never, ever forget that you have to compare historical prices in
>> a constant dollar fashion.
>
>Actually, gulp- I just never realized that they used to cost so much new!
Ah, those were t
On Dec 19, 2008, at 7:58 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
> Also, never, ever forget that you have to compare historical prices in
> a constant dollar fashion.
Actually, gulp- I just never realized that they used to cost so much
new! Despite that though I have never understood why they are simply
m
On Dec 18, 12:25 pm, nestamicky wrote:
> And by best I mean, which of these G4 Desktop-Sawtooth, DA, etc is best
> to get for optimum upgrade? I have a Sawtooth now, but feel as though I
> could put some money on and upgrade a better machine in this line. So,
> which one is best for money, upgr
On Dec 19, 2008, at 4:31 AM, Ted Treen wrote (well, MIKO wrote the
quoted part):
>>
>> The problem is that it was not always- and is only recently- their
>> business model! There used to be affordable G4 towers with extra
>> drive bays and slots and such and now all we've got, before investin
Charles Davis wrote:
>
> On Dec 18, 2008, at 10:36 PM, James E. Therrault wrote:
>
>
>>John Callahan wrote:
>>
Profit margins include all expenses.
JT
>>>
>>>
>>>Would someone make note of the fact that operating costs which
>>>include R&D are deductibles when it comes to Stat
For under $500 you can pick up a dual 1.8 GHz G5. They are air cooled,
don't have the coolant leak problems of later models. The bus speed is
about 6x faster than any G4, they can hold up to 5 hard drives and 4
GB RAM, the components are easy to get to. They have much better
cooling than G4s. My l
MIKO .. wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2008, at 2:57 AM, Ted Treen wrote:
>
>
>> If Apple's business model works for them - and it certainly appears
>> to -
>> then it's better for all of us if they continue to thrive, and not go
>> belly-up like so many other companies who have tried too hard to be
>
On Dec 19, 2008, at 2:57 AM, Ted Treen wrote:
> If Apple's business model works for them - and it certainly appears
> to -
> then it's better for all of us if they continue to thrive, and not go
> belly-up like so many other companies who have tried too hard to be
> all
> things to all men. H
MIKO .. wrote:
>>
>
> OK, really, who cares about arguiing over "claims"?
>
> Can I buy a cheap Mac-compatible machine with the power of a Mc Pro or
> not? I'll NEVER be able "justify" affording the $3000+ for a
> barebones Mac Pro! Suze Orman already DENIED me. LOL
>
Yes. I'll NEVER be able
>
OK, really, who cares about arguiing over "claims"?
Can I buy a cheap Mac-compatible machine with the power of a Mc Pro or
not? I'll NEVER be able "justify" affording the $3000+ for a
barebones Mac Pro! Suze Orman already DENIED me. LOL
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~---
From: insightinmind
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, 18 December, 2008 8:28:54 PM
Subject: Re: Anyone know anything about IOPCI2PCIBridge issues?
On Dec 18, 2008, at 2:15 PM, nestamicky wrote:
insightinmind wrote:
On Dec 18, 2008, at 10:51
From: Dan
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, 18 December, 2008 3:56:53 PM
Subject: Re: TOPIC: Apple & Psystar Why it came to be
At 10:44 PM + 12/17/2008, Ted Treen wrote:
>Wallace Adrian D'Alessio wrote:
> > What many here have said for a lo
31 matches
Mail list logo
